Hi there,
I thought I'd also send an announcement about Morepath to the Python web sig.
Morepath is a Python web framework geared for creating modern
rich-client web applications. It uses routing to model which allows
for easy link generation and greater code reuse. It also has features
for
Hi there,
I thought this might be a nice place to bring hurry.resource to the
attention of more people.
hurry.resource is a way to package Javascript (and CSS) libraries as
Python libraries. It can be compared with client-side javascript-based
resource handling libraries such as the YUI loader.
Hey,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Sergey Schetininmal...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
In particular you should be able to assign a
component to any URL in the same sense that you
can give an object any name. You should also
be able to build relocatable URL trees which can
be mounted
Hey,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Etienne
Robillardrobillard.etie...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't care about '97, pretty much.
Those who do not learn from history are destined to repeat it. :)
I think that if this Jim guy has lots of experience then at least he
could not pretend that other
Hey,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Aaron Wattersarw1...@yahoo.com wrote:
[snip]
If python had a framework that had a simple and
straightforward organization 5 to 10 years ago I don't
think either PHP or Ruby/Rails would have ever evolved.
5 years ago would've been far too late for PHP.
Hi there,
2008/7/4 Iwan Vosloo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[snip]
A lot of the frameworks use a thread local context to solve this
problem. I'm assuming these are based on threading.local.
(See, for example:
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/05/session.html#unitofwork_contextual )
scoped_session is
Hey,
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Iwan Vosloo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 13:31 +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
scoped_session is actually, I think, a bad example, as SQLAlchemy uses
the thread id to scope things per session, not threading.local. As
long as there's a way
Hey,
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Graham Dumpleton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
In the case of code which
Donovan Preston wrote:
On May 5, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
Well, guys, I like SF.net. I understand that many of you don't. I'm
okay with that. I'm willing to bite the bullet and set things up, if
we can all come to concensus about what should be done. Should I just
Donovan Preston wrote:
[snip]
Before I reinvent the wheel of creating new mailing lists, I will
spend some time scouring weblogs and web framework project pages for
projects which are incorporating AJAX features (rails, etc). If I
find another community which is suitable, I'll suggest
Donovan Preston wrote:
[snip]
The shared brain power of a new list and web site which attracted
users from communities other than the Python community could be
valuable, as well. At the same time, we could subtly enlighten people
to the joys of Python just by exposing them to it.
Sounds
Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
I was meaning to look into Sarissa (http://sarissa.sourceforge.net/doc/) which
was mentioned somewhere at some point fairly recently. It doesn't interact
with specific server-side functionality, but we can whip that up quite
easily, can't we? ;-)
Wouldn't it be
A.M. Kuchling wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 05:01:41PM +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote:
If you spell it wrong, you either
get a broken web application with no useful traceback, or else a
monstously hideous traceback that's almost entirely useless.
This is also part of why I've never been able to
Greg Wilson wrote:
Paul Boddie wrote:
...I firmly believe in unbundling templating languages from frameworks.
But doesn't that just make more work for the poor sods who are trying to
build things? After all, they have to rebundle them, don't they?
I think there's a difference between
Hey,
Not much debate from me here on this front, just a lot of agreement.
Ian Bicking wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
[...]
One issue seems to be that Python programmers are automatically
allergic to domain specific glue languages like ZCML, especially when
they look like XML. I think
Bill Janssen wrote:
I don't know about you, but generating HTML with pure Python code can be
messy--ONE reason why we introduce templateing languages in the first
place. Often (not always) the best way to end up with XHTML is to start
with a valid or almost-valid XML document and then infuse the
16 matches
Mail list logo
