I did similarly. This add on report is being run by my script 3 minutes after
midnight generating a report for midnight. It is on a 4 RPI Zero, better to not
run out too at midnight. Clumsy but it works.
Now I have a very good numerical description of minimums and maximums in last 7
and last 3
For people in need of switching USB power to Fine Offset should it be
needed, I have a news I did not find is published.
There is another switchable USB hub that is currently available. Plus, it
is one of the quite rare hubs not backfeeding power to the RPi (or any
other device) controling it!
Solar Radiation, UV and Illuminance are 3 different entities, but the
following measurement:
As it can be observed, all "peaks & valleys" on the plots above are the
SAME, besides a multiplier (power of 10, or other).
1) Are Solar Rad, UV and Illuminance correlated by a multiplier?
2) Are
Ok... with Davis Vue it might be price comparable, but not with high-end
Davis models (and I do acknowledge rain to be a major been near Seattle).
And do have questioning regarding WF SolarRad, UV and Illumination as the
following.
WeatherFlow offers SolarRad, UV and Illuminance sensors, but
Solar Radiation, UV and Illuminance are 3 different entities, but the
following measurement:
As it can be observed, all "peaks & valleys" on the plots above are the
SAME, besides a multiplier (power of 10, or other).
1) Are Solar Rad, UV and Illuminance correlated by a multiplier?
2) Are
WeatherFlow offers SolarRad, UV and Illuminance sensors, but by observing
the plots underneath, it can be noticed that all "peaks & valleys" for all
3 plots to be very similar, or graphs just different by a "multiplier".
Thus, the following questioning:
1) Are SolarRad, UV index and Illumi
thank you all, I got it working in a couple of ways; i. use in-built
alarm.py ii. install extension crt: Cumulus Real-Time to get real-time
data, parse it with a bash script (sending an email or speak some alert!).
I am sharing here my work (could be useful for some noob like me!).
I couldn't c
After some "budget" PWS, I'm glad to land to WeatherFlow, which claims to
measure Solar Radiation, UV index and Illuminance. By "concept", they are
all 3 different 'entities', but as plotted, they all 3 behave the same, as
the following snapshot:
If compared, all 3 had the same "peaks and v
Solar Radiation, UV and Illuminance are 3 different entities, but the
following measurement:
As it can be observed, all "peaks & valleys" on the plots above are the
SAME, besides a multiplier (power of 10, or other).
1) Are Solar Rad, UV and Illuminance correlated by a multiplier?
2) Are
Some ago updated hardware to WeatherFlow, and happy with it. But Radiation,
UV, Illuminance measurements as the following:
By comparison, Solar Radiation, UV and Illuminance plots are "same" to
every 'peaks and valleys'
1) Solar Radiation, UV and Illuminance are different scientific
ent
WeatherFlow offers SolarRad, UV and Illuminance sensors, but by observing
the plots underneath, it can be notice that all "peaks & valleys" to be
very similar, or graphs just different by a "multiplier".
[image: plot.png]
Thus, the following questioning:
1) Are SolarRad, UV index a
Solar Radiation, UV and Illuminance are 3 different entities, but the
following measurement:
As it can be observed, all "peaks & valleys" on the plots above are the
SAME, besides a multiplier (power of 10, or other).
1) Are Solar Rad, UV and Illuminance correlated by a multiplier?
2) Are
Xant writes:
> Excerpt note from WF developer:
>
> There are actually two sensors, each tuned to a different part of the light
> spectrum, in the part we use to measure sunlight (the APDS-9200 from
> Broadcom). The APDS-9200 reports “lux” (aka “brightness”) and “uv index”
> directly (which mus
I should add (and I'll try to post each of my notes only once --
something is wrong where there are multiple copies of many of your
messages, so it would be good if you looked into and fixed that):
I make plots of solar radiation and UV from my archive, and decided to
plot them together and made u
Apologies once again if you receiving multiple copies of messages, as my
posting was been immediately deleted by GoogleGroups. Turned out, it seems
due to image plots trying to be inserted (which I previously done at no
problem). Now avoiding pics into messages. Back to main issue...
Agreed t
I just joined this great form a few days ago.
I recently plugged a Davis temperature probe into the spare VP2 UV port to
try and measure lake water temperature.
Oddly after a bit of reformatting the output seems to be tracking the lake
temperature with a negative sign as can be seen in the comm
On Friday, October 11, 2019 at 2:14:36 AM UTC-7, Pila wrote:
> Of course, the proper solution for me would be to fix it in a source code
> to achieve seamless consistent use of maxmin and minmax. Should I continue
> using it, that will have to wait until I learn Phyton. For now, I am unable
> t
On Thursday, October 10, 2019 at 4:19:55 PM UTC-7, Miste Yalmi wrote:
>
> Let me start by saying that I am new to Python, so please bear with me.
> After installing python and weewx and following the process that was laid
> out here: https://github.com/weewx/weewx/wiki/weewx-on-windows , I
> att
Your posts were not deleted. They were sent to the "moderator's folder,"
for review. I don't know why. In any case, I released them all this morning.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 6:16 AM Xant wrote:
>
> Apologies once again if you receiving multiple copies of messages, as my
> posting was been immedi
Hallo Gary,
thank you very much.
As so often you are my last hope. The last point that WeeWx 3.9.0.
introduced the new settings was the right hint. I compared my WeeWx conf
files with the newest once and I saw this was missing. I probably have made
something wrong when updating the software.
N
Hi,
Interesting project, I’ll make no comment on accuracy/usefulness (what happens
for negative temperature or temperatures off the UV scale for example), guess
some testing and development will show one way or another.
As for your questions these can be easily done, depending on exact
require
Thank you Gary
Your input is greatly appreciated.
Regards
Wade
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 5:53 PM gjr80 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Interesting project, I’ll make no comment on accuracy/usefulness (what
> happens for negative temperature or temperatures off the UV scale for
> example), guess some testing
22 matches
Mail list logo