On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Michael Peel
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
# Press releases. When there's an upcoming significant press release from a
> Wikimedia organisation, then it should be good practice to share it with
> the other movement partners prior to its release, so that they are aware of
> it,
Thanks for sharing!
Emily Blanchard
Talent Acquisition Team
Wikimedia Foundation
eblanchard@wikimedia. org
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home
Become a Contributor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse
Join Us: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Work_with_us
Developers Join t
Hi Itzik! The videographer was Alfonso González, who works in one of the
sponsors of the event, Astrolabio media agency. They will upload sooner a
copy of the video to Commons and I'm asking now about the model of the used
DSLR camera.
2013/4/3 Itzik Edri
> Hi Salvador, thanks for sharing this
This is very nice!
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Markus Glaser wrote:
> Nice one! Thanks for sharing this.
> Markus
>
> Am 03.04.2013 22:00, schrieb Salvador A:
>
> Hi folks!
>>
>> I just wanna share with you a nice video made by one of our cultural
>> partners (Atrolabio). Is about our chapt
Charles,
I'd very much like to see such a session at Wikimedia conf. Just today
we had a situation in wca where it was not clear where relevant
information about a topic is to be found.
Ziko proposed a session on "Communications internally and within the
movement - reaching the right people
Nice one! Thanks for sharing this.
Markus
Am 03.04.2013 22:00, schrieb Salvador A:
Hi folks!
I just wanna share with you a nice video made by one of our cultural
partners (Atrolabio). Is about our chapter last Edit-a-thon in Mexico, the
first in the city of Puebla. You can watch our chapter pre
Hi Salvador, thanks for sharing this video with us. Looks great. Who was
the videographer? with which camera?
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Salvador A wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> I just wanna share with you a nice video made by one of our cultural
> partners (Atrolabio). Is about our chapter last
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Michael Peel wrote:
>
>
> On 3 Apr 2013, at 19:46, Sue Gardner wrote:
>
> > On 3 April 2013 03:34, Michael Peel
> wrote:
> >> So, rather than close the internal wiki, I'd like to propose a radical
> redesign and repurposing of it. Is there the interest and willi
Hi folks!
I just wanna share with you a nice video made by one of our cultural
partners (Atrolabio). Is about our chapter last Edit-a-thon in Mexico, the
first in the city of Puebla. You can watch our chapter president Iván
Martínez and two board members: Carmen Alcazar and Gustavo Sandoval giving
On 3 Apr 2013, at 19:46, Sue Gardner wrote:
> On 3 April 2013 03:34, Michael Peel wrote:
>> So, rather than close the internal wiki, I'd like to propose a radical
>> redesign and repurposing of it. Is there the interest and willingness in the
>> WMF and the chapters to share such information
> On 3 April 2013 03:34, Michael Peel
> wrote:
>> So, rather than close the internal wiki, I'd like to propose a radical
>> redesign and repurposing of it. Is there the interest and willingness
>> in the WMF and the chapters to share such information with each other?
>
> I'd argue against this. Fr
On 3 April 2013 03:34, Michael Peel wrote:
> So, rather than close the internal wiki, I'd like to propose a radical
> redesign and repurposing of it. Is there the interest and willingness in the
> WMF and the chapters to share such information with each other?
I'd argue against this. From the p
This back and forth is tangential to Mike's proposal. Maybe make it a
separate thread?
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
On Apr 3, 2013 3:43 PM, "Federico Leva (Nemo)" wrote:
>
>> But you knew the basis on which internal access is determined and that
>> hasn't changed.
>
>
> Not true. It changed.
Membership is still determined according to the WMF board's resolution from
2006. How long ago were you on there?
__
Thomas Dalton, 03/04/2013 16:03:
On Apr 3, 2013 12:27 PM, "Federico Leva (Nemo)" mailto:nemow...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> May be, or may be not. (Members of internalwiki change constantly, so
e.g. there's no way I could know who has had access to what I wrote
there 5 years ago. I don't remember b
Why are these emails going to Wikimedia-l? They aren't really of interest
to anyone outside Australia...
On Apr 3, 2013 1:09 PM, "Craig Franklin" wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am delighted to advise that we've now locked in the meeting room at the
> Customs House Library in the centre of Sydney for Sund
On Apr 3, 2013 12:27 PM, "Federico Leva (Nemo)" wrote:
>
> May be, or may be not. (Members of internalwiki change constantly, so
e.g. there's no way I could know who has had access to what I wrote there 5
years ago. I don't remember being consulted about every new user created
there after I got my
Pierre-Selim,
in addition to the email you quote below, I sent out a Doodle request on
23.3 and a reminder on 27.3 on chapters-l. I assume all council members
are reading chapters-l and I want to keep organisational stuff off
wikimedia-l. WCA related mails are tagged with [wca] in the mail sub
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Mathieu Stumpf
wrote:
>
> Sorry for the noise, but I didn't know where to post this. Please point me
> any place more appropriate for this kind of topic if you know one.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Lua_scripting is generally a good
place, as is https://en.w
Dear all,
I'm quite astonished we've planned a meeting without informing all the
council members. The only information I've recieved about this meeting was
this email.
I'm not sure how we can improve but our processes seems quite broken to me.
2013/3/28 Markus Glaser
> Dear WCA and friends,
>
Craig Franklin, 03/04/2013 14:18:
I must confess, I have access to two of those "general" private wikis but
very seldom use them all, which probably indicates that in their current
form they don't serve much purpose. So bravo to Michael for raising the
issue to see if we can squeeze some more fu
I must confess, I have access to two of those "general" private wikis but
very seldom use them all, which probably indicates that in their current
form they don't serve much purpose. So bravo to Michael for raising the
issue to see if we can squeeze some more function out of them! I'm
intruiged b
Hi All,
I am delighted to advise that we've now locked in the meeting room at the
Customs House Library in the centre of Sydney for Sunday's session. If
you're free on the day, please feel free to drop by between 11 and 4 for a
chat.
The library is located just opposite Circular Quay rail statio
Le 2013-04-03 12:34, Michael Peel a écrit :
# Agreements, particularly those with global impact, and/or where
they affect more than one Wikimedia organisation. Part of the recent
Monmouthpedia/Gibraltarpedia situation was caused by a lack of
transparency about who had signed what agreements, and
Thomas Dalton, 03/04/2013 13:12:
On Apr 3, 2013 12:07 PM, "Federico Leva (Nemo)" wrote:
Second technical note: a merge from a private wiki to another is very
simple, because you don't have to check for confidentiality
That's not true. Just because it is private doesn't mean it is restricted
t
On Apr 3, 2013 12:07 PM, "Federico Leva (Nemo)" wrote:
> Second technical note: a merge from a private wiki to another is very
simple, because you don't have to check for confidentiality
That's not true. Just because it is private doesn't mean it is restricted
to the same people.
Things on a pri
Michael Peel, 03/04/2013 12:43:
Thanks Nemo - that's a very useful link. It's good to see that there's a number of
"merge w/ internal" comments/suggestions there, which would make a lot of sense
to me.
Disclaimer: I didn't add those notes. :)
Second technical note: a merge from a private wik
Thanks Mike,
I'm very much in favor of a redesign, with a reset of internal subscribers.
What about a session during wikimedia conf in Milan about improving tools for
communication within the movement partners?
Charles
Le 3 avr. 2013 à 12:34, Michael Peel a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> There's cur
On Apr 3, 2013 11:34 AM, "Michael Peel"
wrote:
>
> # Agreements, particularly those with global impact, and/or where they
affect more than one Wikimedia organisation. Part of the recent
Monmouthpedia/Gibraltarpedia situation was caused by a lack of transparency
about who had signed what agreements
On 3 Apr 2013, at 12:40, "Federico Leva (Nemo)" wrote:
> FYI, list of private wikis:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_wikis#Private_wikis
> There are 27 private wikis hosted by the WMF, of which 15 for WMF internal
> organisation (including committees) and 3 for more general Wikimed
FYI, list of private wikis:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_wikis#Private_wikis
There are 27 private wikis hosted by the WMF, of which 15 for WMF
internal organisation (including committees) and 3 for more general
Wikimedia matters.
Nemo
_
Hi all,
There's currently a proposal on the internal mailing list to close it, as well
as the internal wiki. Although I don't disagree with closing the internal-l
mailing list (it's definitely served its time), I would like us to collectively
reconsider using the internal wiki.
There is inform
32 matches
Mail list logo
