I have requested that the Board clarify WMF policy about office actions
with regard to the software features of wikis.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#Request:_clarify_policy_for_on-wiki_Office_actions
Pine
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Pine W wrote:
On 13/07/14 15:07, Milos Rancic wrote:
On Jul 13, 2014 4:20 AM, "Wil Sinclair" wrote:
Please, let us drop this subject.
Richard.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@li
Pine and all,
Please read here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Media_Viewer/June_2014_RfC#Proposal_to_reach_consistency.2Fagreement_first.2C_before_actioning_this_RfC
Gryllida.
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, at 15:03, Pine W wrote:
> This discussion has closed on English Wikipedia:
> https:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:59 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
> Wil Sinclair wrote:
>>Hi all, I've started a new wiki called Offwiki: http://offwiki.org.
>>Our community discusses potential changes to Wikipedia and its
>>Wikimedia sister projects that aren't easily discussed in forums like
>>this mailing list
As a parallel to the motion for management of staff rights on
projects, and staff account naming, proposed in the Arbcom case below,
a request for comments for the Wikimedia Commons community has been
raised today at:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Proposals#Distinguishing_W
> We have had a number (not enough!) of Wikimedia (usually Wikipedia,
> and typically English Wikipedia) discussion sites, but has there been
> any previous ones that have used mediawiki? That is, other than
> Meta.. ?
I can't answer your question about previous sites, but I can tell you
that the
Hello Fellow Wikimedians,
I am pleased to announce that New England Wikimedians’ user group website has
officially launched, and is located at ne-wikimedians.org/. I would also like
to extend a huge thanks to Wikimedia DC's Technical Infrastructure Committee
for helping make this site a possib
Hi Gryllida,
As I said on the Arbcom case page, RfCs result in changes to Wikipedia on a
regular basis despite having a small numbers of participants in each RfC,
and current English Wikipedia policy does not require a minimum number of
participants beyond what is necessary to establish consensus.