What are the issues with your Barracuda?
John
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> On 2009-07-13 20:08, Don Grossman wrote:
>
>> It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
>> are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
>> box that after several attempts to
We still love (and beat the heck out of) can-it from Roaring Penguin.
http://www.roaringpenguin.com/
On 12/30/2009 2:58 PM, Michael Baird wrote:
> We have a mailfoundry, no failures in the 1.5 years it's served as a
> gateway, plus no per domain/user fees. Development seems to have stalled
> on
We have a mailfoundry, no failures in the 1.5 years it's served as a
gateway, plus no per domain/user fees. Development seems to have stalled
on it though, no new OS releases in a year. It is cost effective,
reliable and flexible and easily managed, coming from the
MailScanner/Spamassassin worl
On 2009-07-13 20:08, Don Grossman wrote:
> It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
> are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
> box that after several attempts to work with Barracuda can not be
> resolved.
I tend to use a mix of:
- clamav-m
We're running the setup (Postfix, SA, amavisd-new, FuzzyOCR) except
with Cyrus instead of dbmail. Works great.
--
Blake Covarrubias
On Jul 20, 2009, at 6:37 AM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
>
> I've been running Postfix, amavisd-new, spamassassin, dbmail for many
> years and its been rock solid. I'v
@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Curtis Maurand
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 9:37 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
I've been running Postfix, amavisd-new, spamassassin, dbmail for many
years and its been rock solid.
I've been running Postfix, amavisd-new, spamassassin, dbmail for many
years and its been rock solid. I've also added fuzzyocr to spamassassin.
Marco Coelho wrote:
> We really like Postfix, courier-imap, amavisd-new (includes
> spamassassin), mailgraph, spamakazi, clam-av combo
>
> We have
We really like Postfix, courier-imap, amavisd-new (includes
spamassassin), mailgraph, spamakazi, clam-av combo
We have it sitting on a 8 way machine with raid 0+1 15K SCSI drives
with spares.
Solid.
Marco
Argon Technologies Inc.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:09 PM, John Thomas wrote:
> I kno
I know of Barracudas that the only time they get rebooted is for
firmware updates.
They can run for months without a reboot, but usually the firmware
updates have useful stuff in 3-6 months that requires a firmware upgrade.
John
Charles Wyble wrote:
> David E. Smith wrote:
>
>
>> What kind
Please see my responses inline
Jeremy Parr wrote:
> 2009/7/14 David E. Smith :
>
>> Don Grossman wrote:
>>
>>> It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
>>> are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
>>> box that after several attemp
9 18:50
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
Block people from using those sites?
Kick them off your network?
Are these end users doing this? Or do they have bot infected machines
using webmail to send spam in an automated fashion? If so then
snort+clamav
I also highly recommend Merek Mail.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Hensley"
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evalu
ject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
> I've been a huge fan of Postfix combined with Maia Mailguard
> (maiamailguard.com I think). Allows users to modify their own settings,
> white lists, blacklists, see little graphs on blocked spam for their
> specific account
David E. Smith wrote:
> What kind of problems were/are you having with your Barracudas? On the
> (exceedingly rare) occasion that ours do anything odd, rebooting them
> almost always clears it up.
One should NEVER have to reboot a mail server, outside of a kernel
upgrade (and even then one c
less-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Travis Johnson
> Sent: 14 July 2009 05:40
> To: sarn...@info-ed.com; WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
>
> The difference with Postini compared to an in-house box is Postini stops the
> incoming SPA
Scottie Arnett wrote:
> Agreed! Been using Postfix since I told Postini to take a hike. They both use
> a modified version of Postfix and related add-ons. You can make a spam
> machine out of the cheapest hardware now.
I presume you mean anti spam machine? :)
I have been doing this for ov
+1 for postfix and the mentioned add ons.
3k and it's not redundant? Good grief.
Though it's not a few hours.
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Postfix
Copy/paste from the howtos. Takes like 30 minutes.
WISPA
2009/7/14 David E. Smith :
> Don Grossman wrote:
>> It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
>> are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
>> box that after several attempts to work with Barracuda can not be
>> resolved. Barracuda is helpful bu
Don Grossman wrote:
> It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
> are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
> box that after several attempts to work with Barracuda can not be
> resolved. Barracuda is helpful but like to point at other th
gt; Behalf Of Olufemi Adalemo
> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 5:55 AM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
>
> I have rather different anti-spam requirements
> For a while now I've been looking for a solution to s
ubject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
I have rather different anti-spam requirements
For a while now I've been looking for a solution to stop users on a network
sending spam via web-based email like Hotmail, Gmail and Yahoo by scanning
the outgoing HTTP POST command on a pro
@info-ed.com; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
The difference with Postini compared to an in-house box is Postini stops the
incoming SPAM before it uses any bandwidth on our backbone. Last time I
checked (over a year ago), it was saving us 3-4Mbps of traffic
The difference with Postini compared to an in-house box is Postini
stops the incoming SPAM before it uses any bandwidth on our backbone.
Last time I checked (over a year ago), it was saving us 3-4Mbps of
traffic (24x7). I would guess now it's closer to 7-10Mbps of incoming
SPAM flow that never
I've been a huge fan of Postfix combined with Maia Mailguard
(maiamailguard.com I think). Allows users to modify their own settings,
white lists, blacklists, see little graphs on blocked spam for their
specific account in addition to allowing them to help train the system by
going through copies of
Agreed! Been using Postfix since I told Postini to take a hike. They both use a
modified version of Postfix and related add-ons. You can make a spam machine
out of the cheapest hardware now. I have been doing this for over 3 years and
have a much better customer satisfaction.
Scottie
From: "Jeremy Parr"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re-evaluating our anti-spam solution
> 2009/7/13 Jeremy Parr :
>> 2009/7/13 Don Grossman :
>>> It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solut
2009/7/13 Jeremy Parr :
> 2009/7/13 Don Grossman :
>> It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
>> are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
>> box that after several attempts to work with Barracuda can not be
>> resolved. Barracuda is helpful
2009/7/13 Don Grossman :
> It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
> are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
> box that after several attempts to work with Barracuda can not be
> resolved. Barracuda is helpful but like to point at other thi
It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
box that after several attempts to work with Barracuda can not be
resolved. Barracuda is helpful but like to point at other things like
DNS and unrelate
29 matches
Mail list logo