Those folks at Towerstream really like to test their gear ;-)
https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/els/reports/GenericSearchResult.cf
m?RequestTimeout=500
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
A little while back someone posted a source for 900 mhz BPF they
intended to use with a 900 Mhz MT AP. Could you post that again?
Thanks
Chris
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--
WISPA Wireless
this ? http://www.ubnt.com/cf.php4
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 7:10 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] 900 mhz BPF
A little while back someone posted a source for 900 mhz BPF
Hi Travis,
The 18, 23, and 24 (UL) GHz Dragonwave products do downshift to QPSK from
QAM; their 11 GHz product does not. I believe that this shift is already
figured into Dragonwave's uptime figures.
Your 28 mile link sounds like a good bet to me, but you might want to
analyze maximum rainfall
http://news.com.com/Justice+Department+takes+aim+at+image-sharing+sites/2100-1028_3-6163679.html?tag=nefd.lede
--
Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Serving the License-Free Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the WISP Handbook - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
Marlon Michael;
Mozaltov, Cheers, this is great news, we should work togerther more, IMHO.
Ron Wallace
-Original Message-
From: David Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 5, 2007 09:55 PM
To: ''WISPA General List''
Subject: [WISPA] Press Release: WISPA, Part-15.org concur
Hi Travis,
Just looking to venture into the world of 18GHz. We are looking at our
first link to be about 17.5 miles and I'm wondering if you could give us
more details on your 19 mile link (heights, dish size/db, throughput
speeds, fade margin, etc.)
Many thanks,
Paul.
-Original
yeah interesting quote...
Only universities and libraries would be excluded, one participant said.
There's a PR concern with including the libraries, so we're not going to
include them, the participant quoted the Justice Department as saying. We
know we're going to get a pushback, so we're not
Hi,
We are in a very dry climate (actually considered a desert climate).
Going 19 miles, we are using 4ft high performance dishes with high power
radios (+22db output) and we have 32db of fade margin. This link has
never been down in 3+ years.
Travis
Microserv
paul hendry wrote:
Hi
My understanding about 60ghz (what I remember reading anyway) is that
its good for 1000mbps data links, but MAX distance of 1Mile, since O2
(Oxygen) resonates at 60ghz. It was originally used for spy satellite to
spy satellite links (in space), since it couldn't conceivably be picked
up by any
Yeah, I noticed that too.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Rick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 4:20 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Justice Department Takes Aim at Image-Sharing Sites
yeah interesting quote...
Only
If you define an LSP that matches your SLA then MPLS
instead using SLA driven metrics like latency, jitter, and packet loss.
Good idea. Also learned today that Bridgewave can sent out Traps with
reporting 3 different link states, each indicating how close to the minimum
DB level, to help
I don't agree with all of it. But the main issues are in agreement with
what most wisps will want.
Pushing for unlicensed vs. licensed is a big leap in our direction for Moto.
laters,
marlon
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
13 matches
Mail list logo