Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-input-evdev 2.0.99.2

2008-10-27 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:20:55AM +0100, Søren Hauberg wrote: > Yes, not knowing [a, b] at server startup is indeed the real problem. > If we want to support run-time calibration, then it simply won't be > possible to fix these parameters at startup. From what I understand, > it is only the driver

Re: keysymdef.h has wrong implies symbol?

2008-10-27 Thread James Cloos
> "Peter" == Peter Hutterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter> well, that's the issue with the whole thing (Erik and me Peter> discussed that a bit): Peter> keysymdef.h states that XK_implies is U+21D2 RIGHTWARDS DOUBLE Peter> ARROW. in mathematics, this is the usual symbol for "implies". Pe

Re: Issue with uncommon pointing device.

2008-10-27 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 01:23:03PM -0400, Drew Ogle wrote: > (II) 3Dconnexion SpaceNavigator: Found x and y relative axes > (WW) 3Dconnexion SpaceNavigator: Don't know how to use device that probably just means that it doesn't expose buttons. what's the output of evtest when you point it at the de

RE: xorg Digest, Vol 39, Issue 95

2008-10-27 Thread Bridgman, John
>>fgrlx won't build on current kernels. End of discussion. Corbin is talking about the NDA repository where we are working on open source driver support in parallel with the IP review. We tried doing a review and release on the documentation for the new engine, but after two failed attempts decid

Issue with uncommon pointing device.

2008-10-27 Thread Drew Ogle
I have a uncommon pointing device - a 3Dconnexion SpaceNavigator. Using Fedora 10's 1.5.2, evdev it recognizes it, but isn't sure what to do with the device. (II) 3Dconnexion SpaceNavigator: Found x and y relative axes (WW) 3Dconnexion SpaceNavigator: Don't know how to use device being the opera

Re: modular: Changes to 'master'

2008-10-27 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 27 October 2008, Corbin Simpson wrote: >Miles Bader wrote: >> Corbin Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> radeon doesn't just have r5xx, r6xx, and r7xx support grafted on, as you >>> imply. The support is provided through AtomBIOS, and the acceleration >>> for the r5xx chipsets is near

RE: RFC: HAL probing for VMware vmmouse device

2008-10-27 Thread Philip Langdale
Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Yeah, that looks better to me. Do you actually need to do the probing in > that case, or are there VMWare systems that will expose a PS/2 mouse > port and not allow you to run vmmouse against it? Yes, the active check is required - it's possible to configure a VM with th

Intel Xorg driver with GLSL freez system

2008-10-27 Thread Mateusz Kaduk
Hi, I have debian with xorg 1.5.2 and master mesa/libdrm/intel which I use with EXA and GEM enabled kernel from Eric. I installed nexuiz apt-get install nexuiz and game crash system when I run it with enabled GLSL. Can someone check it ? It also can be downloaded from http://downloads.sourceforge.

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Add XF86XK_Suspend and XF86XK_Hibernate keysym defs.

2008-10-27 Thread Alan Coopersmith
I thought that since we were X.Org, not XFree86, we were going to stop defining new keysyms with XF86 and stop using the vendor space, since we can just define them in the standard space, as the X Standards Body. -alan- Peter Hutterer wrote: > At the moment, we have the following keysyms

Re: RFC: HAL probing for VMware vmmouse device

2008-10-27 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:35:39AM -0700, Philip Langdale wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > No it wasn't, I'm just blind. I think a better way of doing this would > > be to make the callout conditional on there being a PCI device with the > > vmware subsystem. Probing for a vmware mouse on e

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.5.0

2008-10-27 Thread samuel
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:41 PM, samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 18:33 +0200, samuel wrote: >>> I've tried this driver now. doesn't seem to work here... gives me a >>> fatal error and leaves my co

Re: RFC: HAL probing for VMware vmmouse device

2008-10-27 Thread Philip Langdale
Matthew Garrett wrote: > > No it wasn't, I'm just blind. I think a better way of doing this would > be to make the callout conditional on there being a PCI device with the > vmware subsystem. Probing for a vmware mouse on every system that has a > PS/2 port seems excessive. Something more like th

Re: modular: Changes to 'master'

2008-10-27 Thread Corbin Simpson
Miles Bader wrote: > Corbin Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> radeon doesn't just have r5xx, r6xx, and r7xx support grafted on, as you >> imply. The support is provided through AtomBIOS, and the acceleration >> for the r5xx chipsets is nearly identical to the r4xx, with the sole >> exception o

Re: modular: Changes to 'master'

2008-10-27 Thread Miles Bader
Corbin Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > radeon doesn't just have r5xx, r6xx, and r7xx support grafted on, as you > imply. The support is provided through AtomBIOS, and the acceleration > for the r5xx chipsets is nearly identical to the r4xx, with the sole > exception of the programmable fragme

Re: RFC: HAL probing for VMware vmmouse device

2008-10-27 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:50:42AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Hmm. The fdi seemed to be missing? No it wasn't, I'm just blind. I think a better way of doing this would be to make the callout conditional on there being a PCI device with the vmware subsystem. Probing for a vmware mouse on ev

Re: RFC: HAL probing for VMware vmmouse device

2008-10-27 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 05:33:33PM -0700, Philip Langdale wrote: > The mouse appears as a regular PS/2 mouse and detecting that it's the > special vmmouse > a is done completely out of band; we can't change how this works for > compatibility reasons > so I've got to make do. There's no possibil

Re: keysymdef.h has wrong implies symbol?

2008-10-27 Thread Simos Xenitellis
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Erik Streb del Toro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Hutterer schrieb am 27.10.2008 05:41: >> >> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 02:22:03AM -0400, James Cloos wrote: "Peter" == Peter Hutterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>> Peter> diff --git a/src/xl

Re: Failed to download some packages of X11R7.4

2008-10-27 Thread Andrew Haninger
2008/10/27 Wolfgang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > bitmap-1.0.3.tar.bz2 > libX11-1.1.5.tar.bz2 > libXScrnSaver-1.1.3.tar.bz2 > libXfont-1.3.3.tar.bz2 You'll find these files in /pub/individual/lib/ and /pub/individual/app I ran into this problem, too when mgetting /everything. Maybe the li

Failed to download some packages of X11R7.4

2008-10-27 Thread Wolfgang
- Original Message - From: "Wolfgang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 5:43 PM Subject: Failed to download some packages of X11R7.4 > Hi, > I'm sorry to send this messages to all, but I don't know who can help me:) > As the X11R7.4 released, I try to download the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-input-evdev 2.0.99.2

2008-10-27 Thread Colin Guthrie
Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 01:42:31PM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: >> Well they didn't appear to come up I'll have a look and see if I can >> get more info. Not being able to log in to debug it due to lack of >> keyboard meant I didn't really research/probe as much as I sh

libdrm 2.4: Resume from suspend: Error waiting for fence

2008-10-27 Thread Colin Guthrie
Hi, Waiting for stolen goods is always dodgy :p I got this in my xorg.log when resuming from suspend. The xserver then restarted: intel_bufmgr_fake.c:392: Error waiting for fence: Device or resource busy. I don't see anything in the gitlog that could address this but then I'm not convinced t

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-input-evdev 2.0.99.2

2008-10-27 Thread Søren Hauberg
2008/10/27 Peter Hutterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:44:24AM +0100, Søren Hauberg wrote: >> Just a quick thought: double-scaling means we transform one coordinate >> from [a, b] to [c, d] in the driver, and then from [c, d] to [e, f] in >> the server, right? Here [a, b] is de

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-input-evdev 2.0.99.2

2008-10-27 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:44:24AM +0100, Søren Hauberg wrote: > Just a quick thought: double-scaling means we transform one coordinate > from [a, b] to [c, d] in the driver, and then from [c, d] to [e, f] in > the server, right? Here [a, b] is determined by the hardware. What if > we choose [c, d]

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-input-evdev 2.0.99.2

2008-10-27 Thread Søren Hauberg
2008/10/26 Simon Thum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Søren Hauberg wrote: >> issue is keeping the code fairly clean. I imagine that the solution >> you suggest will be fairly complicated, in which case I don't think it >> would be worth the slight performance gain. But perhaps my priorities >> aren't in pl