[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13661982#comment-13661982 ] Hudson commented on YARN-568: - Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #1431 (See [https://builds.

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13661964#comment-13661964 ] Hudson commented on YARN-568: - Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #1404 (See [https://builds.apach

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13661892#comment-13661892 ] Hudson commented on YARN-568: - Integrated in Hadoop-Yarn-trunk #215 (See [https://builds.apache

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13661796#comment-13661796 ] Hudson commented on YARN-568: - Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #3768 (See [https://builds.apa

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13661793#comment-13661793 ] Chris Douglas commented on YARN-568: bq. From the code in generatePreemptionMessage() th

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13661691#comment-13661691 ] Bikas Saha commented on YARN-568: - >From the code in generatePreemptionMessage() the overlap

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13654481#comment-13654481 ] Hudson commented on YARN-568: - Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #1421 (See [https://builds.

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13654437#comment-13654437 ] Hudson commented on YARN-568: - Integrated in Hadoop-Hdfs-trunk #1394 (See [https://builds.apach

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13654352#comment-13654352 ] Hudson commented on YARN-568: - Integrated in Hadoop-Yarn-trunk #205 (See [https://builds.apache

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13653249#comment-13653249 ] Hudson commented on YARN-568: - Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #3726 (See [https://builds.apa

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13653234#comment-13653234 ] Chris Douglas commented on YARN-568: +1 I committed this. Thanks Carlo and Sandy

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13652598#comment-13652598 ] Carlo Curino commented on YARN-568: --- Updated [patch for YARN-569 | https://issues.apache.

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13652548#comment-13652548 ] Carlo Curino commented on YARN-568: --- [~kkambatl] This code was originally in YARN-567 whic

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13652515#comment-13652515 ] Karthik Kambatla commented on YARN-568: --- In {{Allocation}}, the two fields fungible* d

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13651550#comment-13651550 ] Carlo Curino commented on YARN-568: --- Sandy, I ran, in a small 10 machines cluster, the FS

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13651488#comment-13651488 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-568: {color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of te

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13651457#comment-13651457 ] Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-568: - Updated patch should fix findbugs warning

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13651454#comment-13651454 ] Hadoop QA commented on YARN-568: {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of test

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13651440#comment-13651440 ] Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-568: - Posted a patch that adds "kill previously listed containe

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13651304#comment-13651304 ] Carlo Curino commented on YARN-568: --- Following a conversation with Sandy, we post a new ve

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13649591#comment-13649591 ] Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-568: - Thanks for addressing my questions, Carlo. Some response

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13649126#comment-13649126 ] Carlo Curino commented on YARN-568: --- Sandy, I agree with your summary of the FS mechanics,

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13648985#comment-13648985 ] Carlo Curino commented on YARN-568: --- Hi Sandy, thanks for the feedback! I think that if

[jira] [Commented] (YARN-568) FairScheduler: support for work-preserving preemption

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13648982#comment-13648982 ] Sandy Ryza commented on YARN-568: - Hi Carlo, I just looked over your patch. It's looking g