Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2007, at 17:42, Rocky wrote:
>
> >First off, please forgive me if this comes through twice... not sure
> >if I sent it the first time or not.
> >
> >So here's what the consensus seems to be regarding CMF and the local
> >site manager business.
>
> Hey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22 Feb 2007, at 09:03, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Hey Rocky, any progress? Haven't heard and loud yelling from Wichert
yet, but I think he's getting close to the Plone 3.0 beta by now...
I'm hoping for upcoming monday..
Merging the branch into t
The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector
(http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF).
Assigned and Open
mhammond
- "Windows DevelopmentMode penalty in CMFCore.DirectoryView",
[Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/366
yuppie
- "support di
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I'ld also love to see the yuppie-collector467 merged. It has tests and
it works for me :)
No problem. I just want to update the skins.xml files before merging the
branch.
Cheers, Yuppie
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@li
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 22 Feb 2007, at 09:03, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Hey Rocky, any progress? Haven't heard and loud yelling from Wichert
yet, but I think he's getting close to the Plone 3.0 beta by now...
I'm hoping for upcoming monday..
Merging the branch into the trunk is going to be
yuppie-3 wrote:
>
> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>>
>> On 22 Feb 2007, at 09:03, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Hey Rocky, any progress? Haven't heard and loud yelling from Wichert
yet, but I think he's getting close to the Plone 3.0 beta by now...
>>>
>>> I'm hoping for upcoming monday..
>>
>> M
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Wed Feb 21 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Thu Feb 22 12:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : CMF-1.5 Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: CMF Unit Tests
Date: Wed Feb 21 21:40:05 EST 200
On Feb 22, 8:30 am, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my opinion only: I'm sure we can release a Plone beta 1 that depends on a
> CMF alpha if that needs to be. It's not ideal, but we can synchronise a
> little later if it's impractical for everyone involved.
>
> So, Rocky - progress?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22 Feb 2007, at 11:27, yuppie wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 22 Feb 2007, at 09:03, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Hey Rocky, any progress? Haven't heard and loud yelling from
Wichert
yet, but I think he's getting close to the Plone 3.0 beta by no
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 22 Feb 2007, at 11:27, yuppie wrote:
IIRC existing CMF sites stop working with that branch. That has to be
resolved before releasing a beta.
Right, my oversight. I believe the issue can be boiled down to "the
existing CMF site needs to be turned into a Zope 3 'site'
On Feb 22, 11:06 am, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> > Right, my oversight. I believe the issue can be boiled down to "the
> > existing CMF site needs to be turned into a Zope 3 'site' and have a
> > site manager"? Or are there more issues?
>
> None I'm aware of.
There
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22 Feb 2007, at 17:02, Rocky wrote:
On Feb 22, 11:06 am, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Right, my oversight. I believe the issue can be boiled down to "the
existing CMF site needs to be turned into a Zope 3 'site' and
On Feb 22, 1:18 pm, Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess the bigger question is where the hook is that triggers the
> call if needed when an existing CMF site is encountered.
Hm? The same code that creates the portal object should call the make
site stuff (now that i've finished up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rocky wrote:
> On Feb 22, 1:18 pm, Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I guess the bigger question is where the hook is that triggers the
>> call if needed when an existing CMF site is encountered.
>
> Hm? The same code that creates the port
14 matches
Mail list logo
