Magnus Lyckå wrote:
> At 17:54 2002-04-01 -0800, William Trenker wrote:
>
>> but a greenhorn at extending Python yet I had a
>> crude but working Python extension module for
>> SQLite up and running in 2 days
>
>
> So, we expect to see the announcement of a DB-API 2
> complient SQLite driver any
Hello!
I keep hearing people argue that ZClasse are bad, and I am curious as to why
they are.
I recall something about ZClasses and the catalog, but are there any other
"badness" with ZClasses?
/dario - curious
-
Dario Lopez-
Hi!
I guess ZClasses are not "evil" or so. But as somebody who has worked with
ZClasses for a long time and then switched to Python Products instead, I see
a lot of problems/disadvantages ZClasses have:
- Most important: It is rather hard to change the base classes with
ZClasses. In Python, you
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 11:40:36 +0200, "Joachim Werner"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi!
I agree with most of what was said before, but have a few things to
add
>- Most important: It is rather hard to change the base classes with
>ZClasses. In Python, you can do that very easily.
Or you can ado
Hello leo,
> I just put this patch up in production environment and it's been up
for
> more than 1h30m now, which for me is enough indication that it's in
fact
> the final solution to the problem.
Nice to hear. Is there any change that this patch will be included in
the next Zope Binary release?
I would really like to see a hybrid between ZClasses and the CMF's
portal_types, so that you can define methods in the Python class that
you want portal_type instances of this class to be able to overload.
I'm currently abusing the CMF portal_types' actions to "overload"
methods of these types. T
> Nice to hear. Is there any change that this patch will be included in
> the next Zope Binary release?
Well, there will be a python 2.1.3 release for this fix, so I'd imagine
that there will be a binary release from that...
> The beast is killed! Finally! :)
do I hear the sound of the next ki
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Eron Lloyd wrote:
> The problem here seems to be that you are trying to do XML-RPC communication
> with a version of Zope that doesn't support XML-RPC out of the box. You
I think most people missed the point here. I don't think Rossen
is asking for help on running zope or get
Hi,
Like other people on the list I get problems with the splitter. I checked
out latest version of Zope from cvs today, compiled wo_pcgi.py and started
Zope. Running nicely. Then I shut down Zope and copied in a Data.fs file
from Zope 2.4.3 - which by the way runs nicely on Zope 2.5.1-b1.
When
- Original Message -
From: "Petter Enholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:27
Subject: [Zope-dev] Splitter problem #3
>
> I checked the directory containing ZopeSplitter and I saw that the
> __init__.py file was empy. I copied on the one fr
> I think most people missed the point here. I don't think Rossen
> is asking for help on running zope or getting xml-rpc to work with
> it. He's observed a "security" problem: he believes the fact that
> a traceback including path names is included in the error response
> is a security exposure
Merhabalar,
Ankara Sincan Fatih'te satmak istediðim 2 adet dairem var.
1.cisi G.O.P Mahallesinde :
Kombili, PVC li, Çelik Kapýlý, Duvarlar alçýlý, Fayans kaplama, Mutfak Dolaplarý Laminant ve yeni, Metro projesine yakýn, Doðalgaz döþemesi tamam, güney cephe ve 3. kat, 3 oda bir salon..
-- Fiyatý :
I've created a proposal that details what I'm working on to improve
tracebacks for Zope 2.6. (A lot of the work is also going into Zope 3X.)
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/BetterTracebacks
Everyone who is interested in improving Zope's tracebacks, please review
the proposal and c
Dieter Maurer wrote:
>Craeg K Strong writes:
> > ...
> > The Zope protocol handler idea is interesting, and I haven't thought
> > this all the way through yet.
> > Couldbe thought of as referring to "zope://blat"
> > where the Zope protocol is the default
> > and therefore omitted?
>I do
Hi all,
My point was that Zope is revealing internal information that is believed to
be private and invisible for the Internet users.
It happens in its default (debug) installation and even after -D option is
removed from the startup script.
I try some XML-RPC requests against www.zope.org (2.3.2
That is correct, but in the CVS tree the file is empty.
I checked out from the CVS tree yesterday.
Here:
http://cvs.zope.org/~checkout~/Zope/lib/python/Products/PluginIndexes/TextIn
dex/Splitter/ZopeSplitter/
I also downloaded a tar ball for the HEAD tag, which also gives a
__init__.py which ze
16 matches
Mail list logo
