Re: [AI] to delhi university teachers
To initiate any legal matter it is important to exhaust all the available means within system. I have given my representation not only to EOC but also to Vice chancellor, PVC, Dean of colleges of Delhi University also. I once again ask the Delhi university teachers to start this fight in their respective colleges. This struggle needs to be fought and we must win in this battle. In my college, there are 3 permanent ph teachers and all of us are serious regarding this issue of roster. On 1/9/2014 11:41 AM, Dr. Pratap Bisht wrote: EOC is not a grievance cell. - Original Message - From: Manish Sharma manish11...@gmail.com To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled. accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 9:34 PM Subject: [AI] to delhi university teachers Hello to all! This email is addressed to ph. teachers of Delhi University. As all of you must have known that there are two separate rosters are operational in Delhi University. One, 100 point roster is for ph candidates and two; 200 point roster is for SC/ST/OBC. 100 point roster which was for SC/ST, implemented in 1997 has been replaced by 200 point roster came in to effect in 2007. Eversince, 200 point roster has come in to force , administration of colleges has put 100 point roaster for ph under the carpet. Number of ad-hoc teachersin colleges has increased remarkablybut ph have not been appointedaccording to 100 point roster. Few days back , I had posted the case of my college whereteaching strength has crossed 167but only 4 ph have been appointed while it should be 6. Yesterday, I had registered my protest to EOC, university of delhi which I I am pasting below.i request all the ph teachers of delhi university to ensure proper implement ation of 100 point roster in their respective colleges so that we could record our presence in university in dignified manner. I would be happy to help , if needed. My complaint is pasted : To, Dr. Vipin Tiwari, OSD (EOC) University of Delhi, Delhi- 110007. Subject: Violation of PH roster for appointments in teaching post in Swami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi. Sir, I, Manish Sharma, Teacher-in-charge, department of History, Swami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi, hereby bring to your notice and seek necessary action in the case of violation of 100 point PH roster for appointments in teaching post in Swami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi, Delhi -- 36. This is for your information the I, Manish Sharma, received a letter from the Principal, Swami Shraddhanand College, datedinforming the schedule of selection committee to appoint ad-hoc Assistant Professor in the department of History. However, the college in violation of the legal norms had not made public the 200 point post based roster for appointment to teaching post. I duly protested this. (cf. letter to the principal dated, Annexure I, pagesof the file.) Following my protest, the 200 point roster was finally displayed on the college website in the second half of of 23/12/2013. (cf. 200 point roster for teaching post of SSN College for academic semester Jan-April 2014, Annexure II, pagesof the file.) In the less than 24 hours available to me, I perused the roster and found various discrepancies that were duly conveyed to the Principal, Swami Shraddhanand College in my note of dissent submitted before the commencement of the interview process. (cf. note of dissent, date, Annexure III, pagesof the file.) Of these one concerns your jurisdiction. As per the information provided in the 200 point roster displayed on the college website the college has a workload of more thanteaching posts. As per the Persons with disability (PWD) Equal Opportunity, Protection of rights and full participation Act (1996), the college should have appointed six teachers through PH roster i.e. through proper identification and advertisement of seats duly reserved for VH and OH candidates. As per the PH roster 1^st , 34^th , 67^th , 101^st , 134^th and 167^th post are to be reserved for PH candidates. Only four appointments have been made in the college on the PH roster till date, */in gross violation to the undertaking/* */given to the honourable High Court of Delhi, Swami Shraddhanand College has neither advertised not recruited the appropriate numbers of PH Assistant Professors./* Sir, this act of the Principal is in violation of the PWD Act (1996), as well as the undertaking that the University of Delhi and Swami Shraddhanand College gave to honourable High Court of Delhi on correct maintenance and compliance with the 100 point roster for teaching post for PH candidates. Given the severity of the violation I request you to take immediate cognizance of the matter and take necessary steps to ensure the following: 1.Correct and updated 100 point PH roster is displayed in public domain including
Re: [AI] to delhi university teachers
DEAR SIR PLEASE CONTECT ME MY NUMBER IS 09650667889 09983384448 B S CHAUHAN VH On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Manish Sharma manish11...@gmail.com wrote: To initiate any legal matter it is important to exhaust all the available means within system. I have given my representation not only to EOC but also to Vice chancellor, PVC, Dean of colleges of Delhi University also. I once again ask the Delhi university teachers to start this fight in their respective colleges. This struggle needs to be fought and we must win in this battle. In my college, there are 3 permanent ph teachers and all of us are serious regarding this issue of roster. On 1/9/2014 11:41 AM, Dr. Pratap Bisht wrote: EOC is not a grievance cell. - Original Message - From: Manish Sharma manish11...@gmail.com To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled. accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 9:34 PM Subject: [AI] to delhi university teachers Hello to all! This email is addressed to ph. teachers of Delhi University. As all of you must have known that there are two separate rosters are operational in Delhi University. One, 100 point roster is for ph candidates and two; 200 point roster is for SC/ST/OBC. 100 point roster which was for SC/ST, implemented in 1997 has been replaced by 200 point roster came in to effect in 2007. Eversince, 200 point roster has come in to force , administration of colleges has put 100 point roaster for ph under the carpet. Number of ad-hoc teachersin colleges has increased remarkablybut ph have not been appointedaccording to 100 point roster. Few days back , I had posted the case of my college whereteaching strength has crossed 167but only 4 ph have been appointed while it should be 6. Yesterday, I had registered my protest to EOC, university of delhi which I I am pasting below.i request all the ph teachers of delhi university to ensure proper implement ation of 100 point roster in their respective colleges so that we could record our presence in university in dignified manner. I would be happy to help , if needed. My complaint is pasted : To, Dr. Vipin Tiwari, OSD (EOC) University of Delhi, Delhi- 110007. Subject: Violation of PH roster for appointments in teaching post in Swami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi. Sir, I, Manish Sharma, Teacher-in-charge, department of History, Swami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi, hereby bring to your notice and seek necessary action in the case of violation of 100 point PH roster for appointments in teaching post in Swami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi, Delhi -- 36. This is for your information the I, Manish Sharma, received a letter from the Principal, Swami Shraddhanand College, datedinforming the schedule of selection committee to appoint ad-hoc Assistant Professor in the department of History. However, the college in violation of the legal norms had not made public the 200 point post based roster for appointment to teaching post. I duly protested this. (cf. letter to the principal dated, Annexure I, pagesof the file.) Following my protest, the 200 point roster was finally displayed on the college website in the second half of of 23/12/2013. (cf. 200 point roster for teaching post of SSN College for academic semester Jan-April 2014, Annexure II, pagesof the file.) In the less than 24 hours available to me, I perused the roster and found various discrepancies that were duly conveyed to the Principal, Swami Shraddhanand College in my note of dissent submitted before the commencement of the interview process. (cf. note of dissent, date, Annexure III, pagesof the file.) Of these one concerns your jurisdiction. As per the information provided in the 200 point roster displayed on the college website the college has a workload of more thanteaching posts. As per the Persons with disability (PWD) Equal Opportunity, Protection of rights and full participation Act (1996), the college should have appointed six teachers through PH roster i.e. through proper identification and advertisement of seats duly reserved for VH and OH candidates. As per the PH roster 1^st , 34^th , 67^th , 101^st , 134^th and 167^th post are to be reserved for PH candidates. Only four appointments have been made in the college on the PH roster till date, */in gross violation to the undertaking/* */given to the honourable High Court of Delhi, Swami Shraddhanand College has neither advertised not recruited the appropriate numbers of PH Assistant Professors./* Sir, this act of the Principal is in violation of the PWD Act (1996), as well as the undertaking that the University of Delhi and Swami Shraddhanand College gave to honourable High Court of Delhi on correct maintenance and compliance with the 100 point roster for teaching post for PH candidates. Given the severity of the violation I request you to take
[AI] to delhi university teachers
Hello to all! This email is addressed to ph. teachers of Delhi University. As all of you must have known that there are two separate rosters are operational in Delhi University. One, 100 point roster is for ph candidates and two; 200 point roster is for SC/ST/OBC. 100 point roster which was for SC/ST, implemented in 1997 has been replaced by 200 point roster came in to effect in 2007. Eversince, 200 point roster has come in to force , administration of colleges has put 100 point roaster for ph under the carpet. Number of ad-hoc teachersin colleges has increased remarkablybut ph have not been appointedaccording to 100 point roster. Few days back , I had posted the case of my college whereteaching strength has crossed 167but only 4 ph have been appointed while it should be 6. Yesterday, I had registered my protest to EOC, university of delhi which I I am pasting below.i request all the ph teachers of delhi university to ensure proper implement ation of 100 point roster in their respective colleges so that we could record our presence in university in dignified manner. I would be happy to help , if needed. My complaint is pasted : To, Dr. Vipin Tiwari, OSD (EOC) University of Delhi, Delhi- 110007. Subject: Violation of PH roster for appointments in teaching post in Swami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi. Sir, I, Manish Sharma, Teacher-in-charge, department of History, Swami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi, hereby bring to your notice and seek necessary action in the case of violation of 100 point PH roster for appointments in teaching post in Swami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi, Delhi -- 36. This is for your information the I, Manish Sharma, received a letter from the Principal, Swami Shraddhanand College, datedinforming the schedule of selection committee to appoint ad-hoc Assistant Professor in the department of History. However, the college in violation of the legal norms had not made public the 200 point post based roster for appointment to teaching post. I duly protested this. (cf. letter to the principal dated, Annexure I, pagesof the file.) Following my protest, the 200 point roster was finally displayed on the college website in the second half of of 23/12/2013. (cf. 200 point roster for teaching post of SSN College for academic semester Jan-April 2014, Annexure II, pagesof the file.) In the less than 24 hours available to me, I perused the roster and found various discrepancies that were duly conveyed to the Principal, Swami Shraddhanand College in my note of dissent submitted before the commencement of the interview process. (cf. note of dissent, date, Annexure III, pagesof the file.) Of these one concerns your jurisdiction. As per the information provided in the 200 point roster displayed on the college website the college has a workload of more thanteaching posts. As per the Persons with disability (PWD) Equal Opportunity, Protection of rights and full participation Act (1996), the college should have appointed six teachers through PH roster i.e. through proper identification and advertisement of seats duly reserved for VH and OH candidates. As per the PH roster 1^st , 34^th , 67^th , 101^st , 134^th and 167^th post are to be reserved for PH candidates. Only four appointments have been made in the college on the PH roster till date, */in gross violation to the undertaking/* */given to the honourable High Court of Delhi, Swami Shraddhanand College has neither advertised not recruited the appropriate numbers of PH Assistant Professors./* Sir, this act of the Principal is in violation of the PWD Act (1996), as well as the undertaking that the University of Delhi and Swami Shraddhanand College gave to honourable High Court of Delhi on correct maintenance and compliance with the 100 point roster for teaching post for PH candidates. Given the severity of the violation I request you to take immediate cognizance of the matter and take necessary steps to ensure the following: 1.Correct and updated 100 point PH roster is displayed in public domain including the websites of Swami Shraddhanand College and the University of Delhi. 2.That, PH candidates are appointed on the 1^st , 34^th , 67^th , 101^st , 134^th and 167^th posts of the PH roster. Thanking you. Sincerely yours. Manish Sharma Teacher in Charge, Department of History, Swami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110036 Time to meet up again! Register for AccessIndia Convention 2014: http://accessindia.org.in/harish/convention.htm Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change
Re: [AI] to delhi university teachers
EOC is not a grievance cell. - Original Message - From: Manish Sharma manish11...@gmail.com To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled. accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 9:34 PM Subject: [AI] to delhi university teachers Hello to all! This email is addressed to ph. teachers of Delhi University. As all of you must have known that there are two separate rosters are operational in Delhi University. One, 100 point roster is for ph candidates and two; 200 point roster is for SC/ST/OBC. 100 point roster which was for SC/ST, implemented in 1997 has been replaced by 200 point roster came in to effect in 2007. Eversince, 200 point roster has come in to force , administration of colleges has put 100 point roaster for ph under the carpet. Number of ad-hoc teachersin colleges has increased remarkablybut ph have not been appointedaccording to 100 point roster. Few days back , I had posted the case of my college whereteaching strength has crossed 167but only 4 ph have been appointed while it should be 6. Yesterday, I had registered my protest to EOC, university of delhi which I I am pasting below.i request all the ph teachers of delhi university to ensure proper implement ation of 100 point roster in their respective colleges so that we could record our presence in university in dignified manner. I would be happy to help , if needed. My complaint is pasted : To, Dr. Vipin Tiwari, OSD (EOC) University of Delhi, Delhi- 110007. Subject: Violation of PH roster for appointments in teaching post in Swami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi. Sir, I, Manish Sharma, Teacher-in-charge, department of History, Swami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi, hereby bring to your notice and seek necessary action in the case of violation of 100 point PH roster for appointments in teaching post in Swami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi, Delhi -- 36. This is for your information the I, Manish Sharma, received a letter from the Principal, Swami Shraddhanand College, datedinforming the schedule of selection committee to appoint ad-hoc Assistant Professor in the department of History. However, the college in violation of the legal norms had not made public the 200 point post based roster for appointment to teaching post. I duly protested this. (cf. letter to the principal dated, Annexure I, pagesof the file.) Following my protest, the 200 point roster was finally displayed on the college website in the second half of of 23/12/2013. (cf. 200 point roster for teaching post of SSN College for academic semester Jan-April 2014, Annexure II, pagesof the file.) In the less than 24 hours available to me, I perused the roster and found various discrepancies that were duly conveyed to the Principal, Swami Shraddhanand College in my note of dissent submitted before the commencement of the interview process. (cf. note of dissent, date, Annexure III, pagesof the file.) Of these one concerns your jurisdiction. As per the information provided in the 200 point roster displayed on the college website the college has a workload of more thanteaching posts. As per the Persons with disability (PWD) Equal Opportunity, Protection of rights and full participation Act (1996), the college should have appointed six teachers through PH roster i.e. through proper identification and advertisement of seats duly reserved for VH and OH candidates. As per the PH roster 1^st , 34^th , 67^th , 101^st , 134^th and 167^th post are to be reserved for PH candidates. Only four appointments have been made in the college on the PH roster till date, */in gross violation to the undertaking/* */given to the honourable High Court of Delhi, Swami Shraddhanand College has neither advertised not recruited the appropriate numbers of PH Assistant Professors./* Sir, this act of the Principal is in violation of the PWD Act (1996), as well as the undertaking that the University of Delhi and Swami Shraddhanand College gave to honourable High Court of Delhi on correct maintenance and compliance with the 100 point roster for teaching post for PH candidates. Given the severity of the violation I request you to take immediate cognizance of the matter and take necessary steps to ensure the following: 1.Correct and updated 100 point PH roster is displayed in public domain including the websites of Swami Shraddhanand College and the University of Delhi. 2.That, PH candidates are appointed on the 1^st , 34^th , 67^th , 101^st , 134^th and 167^th posts of the PH roster. Thanking you. Sincerely yours. Manish Sharma Teacher in Charge, Department of History, Swami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110036 Time to meet up again! Register for AccessIndia Convention 2014: http://accessindia.org.in/harish/convention.htm Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile
