[Bug 7228] Disabling ACPI is the only way to enable sound on certain Conexant-codec hda-intel platforms
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7228 --- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 01:24 --- I do not own this laptop any more. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 --- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 02:04 --- Will try later, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 350017] powersaved segfault after BIOS upgrade on Asus M2N32-SLI Deluxe
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350017
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350017#c16
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Renninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 03:49:58
MST ---
Yakui: What kind of DSDT is that, the one for the 1201 or 1503 BIOS? Using the
wrong one on the wrong BIOS is not a good idea.
Would you mind sharing your ideas and at least post the diff of your debug and
the original DSDT.
Some info about 10.3 (a lot SUSE users do not know how to compile a kernel):
- DSDT can be overridden without kernel recompilation:
http://powersave.sourceforge.net/powersave/DSDT.html
- Since 10.3 OpenSuSE kernel versions have ACPI_DEBUG=y compiled in by
default
The correct fix for the broken 1503 BIOS is this:
Compilation complete. 0 Errors, 5 Warnings, 0 Remarks, 1097 Optimizations
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dsdt/asus_bug_325995_bios_1503 diff -u DSDT.dsl
DSDT.dsl.modif
--- DSDT.dsl2008-01-14 17:57:32.094872000 +0100
+++ DSDT.dsl.modif 2008-01-15 11:32:50.497733000 +0100
@@ -17,8 +17,6 @@
*/
DefinitionBlock (DSDT.aml, DSDT, 1, NVIDIA, AWRDACPI, 0x1000)
{
-External (\_PR_.CPU0)
-
Scope (\_PR)
{
Processor (\_PR.C000, 0x00, 0x, 0x00) {}
@@ -8988,7 +8986,7 @@
Name (_PSL, Package (0x01)
{
-\_PR.CPU0
+\_PR.C000
})
Name (_TSP, 0x3C)
Name (_TC1, 0x04)
I could reproduce and get the exact stack backtrace on a totally different
machine (with passive trip point, _PSL support), by modifying the reference
returned by _PSL to something invalid (and compile it with iasl -sa -f). This
is the output of a modified Compaq 6715b where I invalidated the _PSL reference
object:
Process powersaved (pid: 3063, threadinfo 810071bea000, task
810075639790)
Stack: 8032d20e 810074db2818 810071bebe78 4d52454854584e4c
810072a9f0c0 8801434d 803389f0 0003
8100757f8000 880135c5 00100073
Call Trace:
[8032d20e] acpi_get_data+0x3e/0x6e
[803389f0] acpi_bus_get_device+0x25/0x68
[880135c5] :thermal:acpi_thermal_trip_seq_show+0x12b/0x257
[802a2482] seq_read+0x105/0x28b
[8028a2f1] vfs_read+0xcb/0x153
[8028a685] sys_read+0x45/0x6e
[80209dac] tracesys+0xdc/0xe1
My patch from comment #13 is wrong.
What we need to know is how to detect whether a handle has an invalid/undefined
type.
I try to come up with another patch...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9169] Fan not working after resume from hibernate but ok after s2ram - Toshiba Satellite U305-S5077
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9169 --- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 03:15 --- From the opensuse report, which is solved now: I think the active[0] message is related to the particular configuration of my system. In the /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/trip_points file I can see critical (S5): 110 C passive: 105 C: tc1=2 tc2=10 tsp=100 devices=CPU1 active[0]: 60 C: devices=FN00 so I assume that the active[0] message comes from here. On the other hand, I solved the problem updating to the kernel 2.6.24-rc6-git11-3. The fan worked again flawlessly. Maybe you should try this one. And be careful with udev during the update!!! You can have a look the the opensuse thread if you want more info Hope it helps -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 336538] Processor fan stops after resuming from disk
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336538 User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336538#c36 --- Comment #36 from Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 04:11:39 MST --- Can you please file a bug report on the initrd issue? We definitely need to get that fixed. Thanks a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 336538] Processor fan stops after resuming from disk
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336538 User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336538#c35 Alejandro Marino Vaquero Avilés-Casco [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Info Provider|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | --- Comment #35 from Alejandro Marino Vaquero Avilés-Casco [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 04:07:25 MST --- Good news! The kernel 2.6.24-rc6-git11-3 fixes the thermal issue. After resuming from disk, the fans are still working! Good job guys. s2ram is still a bit buggy, but I'm aware my laptop is not in the database. The only ugly point is that bug in mkinitrd, which doesn't takes into account the version of udev you're handling. So, shall we close the thread? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 350017] powersaved segfault after BIOS upgrade on Asus M2N32-SLI Deluxe
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350017 User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350017#c18 --- Comment #18 from Thomas Renninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 07:22:26 MST --- Created an attachment (id=190564) -- (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=190564) Debug patch This spits out the invalid memory for a handle if acpi_evaluate_reference is invoked on an invalid reference, e.g.: Reference handle: 4d52454854584e4c - Reference type 0 But now I expect the bug is much deeper, possibly to search here: acpi_ds_build_internal_object(..) in drivers/acpi/dispatcher/dsobject.c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9169] Fan not working after resume from hibernate but ok after s2ram - Toshiba Satellite U305-S5077
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9169 --- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 06:09 --- Tried with v2.6.24-rc7-71-gfd0b45d, no joy. BTW, my /proc/acpi/fan is void, and (0)rukbat:/usr/src/linux-2.6% cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/trip_points critical (S5): 104 C passive: 104 C: tc1=2 tc2=3 tsp=40 devices=CPU0 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 8532] RESET on poweroff if Adaptec present
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8532 --- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 10:33 --- Yes, what with Christmas and everything, compiling a kernel was least of the things on my mind. However, I have compiled without suspend and resume and it doesn't work. That is what I just said in #29. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9754] Sensors not updated causing CPU to heat after suspend/hibernate - Acer Aspire 5315
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acpi- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||et Component|Power-Thermal |Platform-Drivers Summary|Sensors not updated causing |Sensors not updated causing |CPU to heat after |CPU to heat after |suspend/hibernate on laptop |suspend/hibernate - Acer |acer aspire 5315|Aspire 5315 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 11:16 --- Both suspend and hibernate show the same stopped-fan-on-resume symptom? If that is true, it sounds more like we are restoring state when the system doesn't want us to. What happens on Windows when the platform-specific tool is not present or disabled -- does the fan behave the same way as on Linux? What if the tool is started only after the resume, does the system get better, or is it necessary for it to be running before suspend? How about if the tool is stopped after resume, does the system continue to update temperature without it? The more you can tell us about how the tool works the better chance we have of figuring out exactly why it is needed and what Linux can do about it. Obviously it would be best if Acer supported Linux running on this system, and provided the necessary life-support to make the OS run. But maybe we can find out enough about how it works to make use of this un-supported product... Please attach the output from acpidump. I'm wondering if there are WMI hooks in this box that can be used to bring it to life. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9630] PNP revert create dma performance degradation
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9630 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #14422|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 11:36 --- Created an attachment (id=14467) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14467action=view) increase PNP_MAX_PORT Thanks for trying the patch. With the 2.6.24 release being imminent, putting the ACPI motherboard driver in seems like too big a change, and it certainly seems too big for the stable series. Len put this change in 2.6.24-rc, and it should also solve the problem for you. Sorry to ask for more testing, but could you double-check that this fixes your problem? If so, this would be a reasonable change to also put in the 2.6.23-stable series. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9754] Sensors not updated causing CPU to heat after suspend/hibernate - Acer Aspire 5315
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 12:37 --- I could just try with hibernate because of a bug when returning from suspend, but on the forum it was told that suspend was leading to the same problem. I don't have any Windows on my computer so I can't test what occurs on Windows. I've asked on he Ubuntu forums for people that could do these checks and I'll give you the answers when I get them. This behavior is clearly an ugly failure from Acer and not a hardware standard in any way. I really don't favor these choices but this laptop is really common because it's very cheap. I attach the output of acpidump. erratum: the tool is named ePower Management -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9630] PNP revert create dma performance degradation
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9630 --- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 12:39 --- I just applyed A patch, there's a little problem: values submitted are not the ones inside 2.6.23.12's include/pnp.h, do I have to patch another version? 2.6.23.11-12 diff patch [...] -#define PNP_MAX_PORT 24 -#define PNP_MAX_MEM12 +#define PNP_MAX_PORT 8 +#define PNP_MAX_MEM4 [...] suggested patch [...] -#define PNP_MAX_PORT 24 +#define PNP_MAX_PORT 40 #define PNP_MAX_MEM12 [...] ? I decided to compile a 2.6.23.12 reverting this constants values as before 2.6.23.12: -#define PNP_MAX_PORT 8 -#define PNP_MAX_MEM4 +#define PNP_MAX_PORT 24 +#define PNP_MAX_MEM12 Tell me if I made a big mistake leaving PNP_MAX_PORT lower than suggested 40, or if I misunderstood something. My CPU is crunching the kernel now... I'll post the results soon. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9754] Sensors not updated causing CPU to heat after suspend/hibernate - Acer Aspire 5315
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO||7216 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 8288] acpi logs flood by processor CPU1 events
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8288 --- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 14:10 --- Alexey, Shouldn't saved be percpu for SMP case? Thanks, Venki -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9341] /proc/acpi/battery displays Incorrect voltages - Gateway 450ROG, MSI GX700
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9341 --- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 15:31 --- I am testing the patch from Comment#12 more than one week. Sometimes battery info randomly disappears in both /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/* and /sys/class/power_supply/. It can return back spontaneously in 1-60 minutes. But when the battery info exists it shows the correct values. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9630] PNP revert create dma performance degradation
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9630 --- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 15:49 --- The idea was to make PNP_MAX_PORT 40, like it currently is in 2.6.24-rc. The value has been increased a couple times recently as we've tripped over problems. I think I'll suggest that Greg KH put that change into -stable, along with another one that works around an it87 problem exposed by the larger PNP_MAX_PORT. Thanks for all your testing. Sometimes there are heisenbugs that seem to go away when we look closer :-) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9341] /proc/acpi/battery displays Incorrect voltages - Gateway 450ROG, MSI GX700
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9341 --- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 15:58 --- Could you try to comment out acpi_ec_burst_disable()? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9754] Sensors not updated causing CPU to heat after suspend/hibernate - Acer Aspire 5315
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 15:59 ---
Device (WMID) {
Name (_HID, PNP0C14)
/me wonders if ePower Management uses these WMI hooks...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9747] Oops on boot from laptop mode writing to /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/throttling
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9747 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9754] Sensors not updated causing CPU to heat after suspend/hibernate - Acer Aspire 5315
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 16:48 ---
ACPI does not control the fans on the Acer 5315.
There are no active cooling trip points under
the _TZ/_TZ01 -- the only ACPI thermal zone on the system.
And there are no PNP0C0B fan devices.
Re: the temperature reported by the ACPI thermal zone:
Method (_TMP, 0, Serialized)
{
If (ECON)
{
If (DTSE)
{
Store (DTS2, Local1)
If (LGreaterEqual (DTS1, DTS2))
{
Store (DTS1, Local1)
}
Store (Local1, \_SB.PCI0.LPC.EC0.SKTA)
Return (Add (0x0AAC, Multiply (Local1, 0x0A)))
}
}
Return (0x0BB8)
}
if (!ECON) you would get a constant reading:
0xBB8 = 3000 - 300.0K - 27C
Hmmm, but you're seeing 55C after resume -- is that always
true no matter what temperature was upon suspend?
also, if !ECON, a lot of things in the DSDT would go away
eg. does /proc/acpi/battery/*/* still make sense after resume?
Perhaps you are open to some debugging with a modified DSDT?
http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/acpi/overridingDSDT.php
Might be non-trivial, because past experience suggests
that nobody at Acer has ever run their ASL through
http://linuxfirmwarekit.org/ etc.
but first, perhaps you can poke some easy to turn knobs.
any difference booting with
acpi_osi=
or
acpi_osi=!Windows 2006
(this may effect other things, such as HPET, or video display events)
BTW, here is yet another platform-specific item in this system
that Linux doesn't know about:
Device (MIR)
{
Name (_HID, EisaId (ENE0100))
I have no idea what it is, but in Windows you'll see this device
on IRQ 4.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 350017] powersaved segfault after BIOS upgrade on Asus M2N32-SLI Deluxe
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350017
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350017#c19
--- Comment #19 from Yakui Zhao [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 18:49:16 MST ---
HI, Thomas
thanks for your work.
As you pointed that, the difference between the customed DSDT and original
DSDT is that:
DefinitionBlock (DSDT.aml, DSDT, 1, NVIDIA, AWRDACPI, 0x1000)
{
-External (\_PR_.CPU0)
-
Scope (\_PR)
{
Processor (\_PR.C000, 0x00, 0x, 0x00) {}
@@ -8988,7 +8986,7 @@
Name (_PSL, Package (0x01)
{
-\_PR.CPU0
+\_PR.C000
})
To use the customed DSDT is to confirm whether the problem is caused by the
uncorrrect reference in _PSL method. Now it seems that it is caused by the
broken BIOS. It will be more appropriate to fix this bug by BIOS update.
What you said in comment #17 is very right. After applying the patch in
bug9429 ,access to unresovled reference will cause potential problem.
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9642] no backlight on lid open starting in 2.6.23 - nx6110
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9642 --- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-15 20:06 --- Created an attachment (id=14471) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14471action=view) dmesg after close and open lid on kernel 2.6.22 I had test kernel 2.6.22 with acpi_debug, on this weekend. The lid button was working, but something on Kernel boot make ACPI failed and /proc/acpi/buttons and acpi/battery as disappeared on kernels 22 versions, with or without ACPI_DEBUG. I had used a stocked kernel, big !?, ACPI buttons and battery never had disappeared before :(, this seems somehow related with intel-viedo drive, which I had upgrade in mean time. Ah and the day before I try used one attach one monitor and work with dual head , the fn + F4 works with 22 but not in 23 , so this silence of ACPI events is not only on lid button. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9723] Convert procfs to sysfs for /proc/acpi/wakeup
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9723 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |bugs.osdl.org | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9731] 2.6.24-rc7: Deadlock when any ACPI eject sys node written
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9731 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |bugs.osdl.org | -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9730] No ACPI battery info
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9730 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9730] No ACPI battery info
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9730 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acpi- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||et -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9354] ACPI Error attaching device data
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
