[Bug 9761] unsupported ACPI video device
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9761 --- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 00:30 --- yes, it seems it works. The brightness keys works in console, so everything is ok. I now don't have anymore a oops in my console. What does _ADR usually provides more ? Should I contact the manufacturer to make him fixing that ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9754] Sensors not updated causing CPU to heat after suspend/hibernate - Acer Aspire 5315
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 02:26 --- Hi, I have the same problem with the same hardware. I'm running Gentoo, so I think it is not distribution-related. The problem is still there with the 2.6.24 kernel. I have something more: my acpi -V (launched in a shell) reports temperature, but it does not report battery status. I don't know how, but Gnome knows the battery charge. Before sleep/hibernate, this tool is accurate, but after it always gives the charge before sleeping/hibernating. So for me, the problem is the same with battery and temperature. Maybe !ECON... The problem is really annoying and I'm quite motivated to resolve the problem, even if I have to hack 2 or 3 lines in the kernel. I'll give you some news if I find something... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 8853] irq NN: nobody cared on ThinkPad X61T,T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8853 --- Comment #131 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 05:22 --- Thanks for pointing that out, Jan! That BIOS update doesn't come up when i enter the model ID of my Thinkpad (8932-A13) directly into the Lenovo support page, so i hadn't found it when i'd looked previously. I've applied this update and it appears to have fixed the problem. So far, bluetooth has been enabled for 45 minutes and the RHS USB ports are still working - with no kernel message about disabling interrupt. So it appears this bug is solved for the 15.4 widescreen model with IEEE 1394 - 8932-A13. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9754] Sensors not updated causing CPU to heat after suspend/hibernate - Acer Aspire 5315
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754 --- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 09:18 --- Nice to find another person with the same bug and willing to solve it. ;-) Your install can be helpful to perform tests... Maybe if you have Windows, you could try the checks about ePower Manager that I could not do. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9754] Sensors not updated causing CPU to heat after suspend/hibernate - Acer Aspire 5315
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754 --- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 06:44 --- (In reply to comment #6) Hi, ACPI does not control the fans on the Acer 5315. There are no active cooling trip points under the _TZ/_TZ01 -- the only ACPI thermal zone on the system. And there are no PNP0C0B fan devices. I'm not sure to understand. There is no direct control of the fans by ACPI, but when I rmmod the ACPI thermal module, the fans keep the state before removing it (they stay on if they were on, off if they were off) whatever the real CPU temperature. So yes, there is no direct control of the fans, but without ACPI the fans don't work at all. Did I miss something? if (!ECON) you would get a constant reading: 0xBB8 = 3000 - 300.0K - 27C Hmmm, but you're seeing 55C after resume -- is that always true no matter what temperature was upon suspend? also, if !ECON, a lot of things in the DSDT would go away eg. does /proc/acpi/battery/*/* still make sense after resume? I have a funny behaviour (hm... not really funny, just strange). Under 2.6.24, I use the new ACPI API, in /sys not in /proc. The file /sys/bus/acpi/drivers/battery/PNP0C0A:00/power_supply/BAT0/charge_now makes sense, before and after sleeping/hibernating. But the new API is labelled *Future* power /sys interface and everything is not finished: some features are still in /proc, for example thermal. /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/TZ01/temperature makes sense before sleeping/hibernating, but not after. Maybe is the new ACPI API updating the infos after sleeping in /sys but not those in /proc. Maybe it's just a coincidence, because Milan seems to be using the old API and /proc/acpi/battery is updated. Moreover, before or after sleeping, HAL is not updating my battery charge even if /sys/bus/.../battery/.../charge is updated. Gnome seems to use value, because it does not update the charge neither. If I restart HAL, the charge is updated once but never updated after. It seems to be a HAL bug, but... At least, I answered the questions I asked in #8. Well, I'm not pessimistic but it seems to be a complex problem... If anyone needs informations, I'm ready to test, report or compile anything useful, just ask. Thanks... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9772] 2.6.24-rc8 + patches: CPU hot removal while CPU is online leaves system in bad state
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772 --- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 10:27 --- Both patches seem to work as advertised. Thanks! I still need to do some stress testing, but things now look a lot better than they did. I'm not sure what the protocol here is. Do I mark the bug as fixed with CODE_FIX, or do I not do that until the patch is actually in the kernel? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 8734] several problems with Pentium M 773 on MSI-9625
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8734 --- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 12:59 --- Created an attachment (id=14640) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14640action=view) requested acpidump output of acpidump --addr 0xff810 --length 0x100 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9163] Resume form memory suspend causes about a half a minute wait
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163 --- Comment #57 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 12:13 --- In the configuration as per Comment #55, please do: # echo core /sys/power/pm_test # echo mem /sys/power/state (this will test the suspend/resume sequence with busy-waiting for 5 sec. instead of suspending) # echo mem /sys/power/state and see if you have problems after that. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9163] Resume form memory suspend causes about a half a minute wait
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163 --- Comment #56 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 11:47 --- Hi Rafael, I tried it, but had troubles after second time s2disk. Any hopes for trying the -rt patch-series? And could you suggest any debugging options that might yield useful information? By the way, I'm currently only testing whether I can reproduce the problem, I'm not testing all details as I reported in comment #52. Anyway, thanks for the suggestion :-) Please keep alerting me when you need further testing. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9167] No TZ.temp update, no fan control (64-bit only) - Acer Aspire 5720, 7720Z - Santa Rosa, T7300
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 8803] Sony Vaio Picturebook PCG-C1VE: Kernel panic - not syncinc: Fatal exception in interrupt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8803 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 8573] ACPI Exception (battery-0216): AE_SUPPORT, Extracting _BST [20070126] - Acer Aspire 1640z
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8573 --- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 16:14 --- It is called with NULL/ACPI_ALLOCATE buffer, so it is acpi_evaluate_object, who creates wrong size. Also, did you notice, that ut_initialize_buffer may shrink preallocated buffer? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9772] 2.6.24-rc8 + patches: CPU hot removal while CPU is online leaves system in bad state
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772 --- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 16:23 --- I take it back. The force-offline-processor patch doesn't seem to be working quite right yet. The processor goes offline, but the kernel never seems to invoke the _EJ0 method for the CPU object, and the ACPI0007:01 sysnode tree isn't cleaned up. Invoking the eject method again causes the command to complete, but my bash shell locks up. I'm able to start a reboot via control-alt-delete, but I get messages on the console from init that say that various pids seem to hang, and the reboot process hangs. I have to power cycle the machine. With the other patch, I can at least fix up my /sbin/hotplug script so that it always offlines the correct CPU before issuing the eject though, which is nice! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 8573] ACPI Exception (battery-0216): AE_SUPPORT, Extracting _BST [20070126] - Acer Aspire 1640z
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8573 --- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 16:03 --- I've tried to reproduce this here, no luck so far. There exists the possibility that the caller to acpi_evaluate_object is passing in an acpi_buffer object with an incorrect length. In other words, the battery driver may be reporting a pre-allocated buffer of sufficient length, but the actual buffer is smaller than reported. This could result in the buffer overflow, as the acpica code will trust the reported length of the buffer. Alexey, please take a look at what parameters are being passed to evaluate_object. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9642] no backlight on lid open starting in 2.6.23 - nx6110
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9642 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9781] kacpid uses 80% CPU - E4400/D945GCNL
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9781 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO --- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 22:51 --- Hi, Dennis From the log in comment #22 and #24 it seems that this is a problem of acpi interrupt floods, which is caused by GPE 0x1D . Will you please attach the output using the attached tool in comment #30? It will be great if you can do the test in two modes: hard reset and warm reset(first boot into Xp or vista and then into linux). Will you please do the following test after the system is booted(hard reset)? a. write 0x2000 into the 0x52C I/O port (16 bit access) b. cat /proc/interrupts interrupts_before ; dmesg dmesg_before; c. echo 0xa. echo 0x04 /sys/module/acpi/parameters/debug_layer and echo 0x0800 /sys/module/acpi/parameters/debug_level d. After the system runs about 1 minutes, cat /proc/interrupts interrupts_after and dmesg dmesg_after. At the same time please confirm whether the problem disappear. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9781] kacpid uses 80% CPU - E4400/D945GCNL
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9781 --- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 22:33 --- Created an attachment (id=14645) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14645action=view) use the attached tool to read from I/O port Hi, Dennis Will you please use the attached tool to read the following I/O port and attach the output? a. 0x504 16-bit access b. 0x50c 16-bit access c. 0x52c 16-bit access How to use the attached tool can be found in the readme. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9772] 2.6.24-rc8 + patches: CPU hot removal while CPU is online leaves system in bad state
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772 --- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-29 23:27 --- (In reply to comment #12) The processor goes offline, but the kernel never seems to invoke the _EJ0 method for the CPU object, and the ACPI0007:01 sysnode tree isn't cleaned up. Wreid, can you attach the dmesg output and tree ACPI0007:01 after eject the processor for the first time? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
