[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 --- Comment #9 from Jacob Kaulike (kaul...@system76.com) --- I've just given that a try and it does fix this issue -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218867] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/acpi/acpica/dswexec.c:401:12
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218867 Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@gmx.com --- Comment #1 from Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) --- 6.1.25 is really old and unlikely to get any fixes. Is this reproducible in 6.6.31/6.9.1? -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 --- Comment #8 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- This fix was posted, can you please try it? https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/954 -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #59 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Hi Ralph, Thank you for trying the instructions. You can safely ignore the BTF related stuff, don't worry about it :). Do you have any newer kernels pre-built that you can try running on your system? -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #58 from Ralph Martin (ra...@cs.cf.ac.uk) --- Hi Diogo When I try to compile the modules following your instructions, I got Skipping BTF generation for /home/ralph/Downloads/linux-6.9.1/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_acpi.ko due to unavailability of vmlinux It was not clear if that was essential or not. I tried to fix this up, but after copying `/sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux` to corresponding position and with `dwarves` installed, building the kernel module throws an error: `/bin/sh: 1: ./tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/resolve_btfids: not found`. I see Bug#1027306: mentions this issue. I am getting further from trying out your fix it seems, rather than closer... -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218867] New: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/acpi/acpica/dswexec.c:401:12
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218867 Bug ID: 218867 Summary: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/acpi/acpica/dswexec.c:401:12 Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ACPICA-Core Assignee: acpi_acpica-c...@kernel-bugs.osdl.org Reporter: ionut_n2...@yahoo.com Regression: No [0.662597] [0.662604] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/acpi/acpica/dswexec.c:401:12 [0.662611] index -1 is out of range for type 'acpi_operand_object *[9]' [0.662615] CPU: 0 PID: 18 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.1.25-1-lowlatency #1 [0.662618] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC9i7QNX/NUC9i7QNB, BIOS QXCFL579.0034.2019.1125.1436 11/25/2019 [0.662620] Workqueue: kacpid acpi_os_execute_deferred [0.662626] Call Trace: [0.662628] [0.662630] dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x6f [0.662635] dump_stack+0x10/0x18 [0.662639] ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x3a [0.662642] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds.cold+0x46/0x4b [0.662645] acpi_ds_exec_end_op+0x943/0x950 [0.662650] acpi_ps_parse_loop+0x28e/0xa30 [0.662654] acpi_ps_parse_aml+0x226/0x5f0 [0.662657] acpi_ps_execute_method+0x172/0x3e0 [0.662661] acpi_ns_evaluate+0x2f2/0x5e0 [0.662663] acpi_ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method+0x14b/0x1d0 [0.662668] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x17/0x40 [0.662671] process_one_work+0x222/0x3f0 [0.662675] worker_thread+0x50/0x480 [0.662679] ? process_one_work+0x3f0/0x3f0 [0.662682] kthread+0xea/0x120 [0.662684] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 [0.662687] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [0.662694] [0.662695] e -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218867] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/acpi/acpica/dswexec.c:401:12
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218867 sander44 (ionut_n2...@yahoo.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Kernel Version||6.1.25 -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #57 from Ralph Martin (ra...@cs.cf.ac.uk) --- Hi Diogo I followed your instructions (I am using the current testing kernel 6.7.12), building the module with the 6.9.1 sources, disabling safe boot, and got insmod: ERROR: could not insert module drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/typec_ucsi.ko: Unknown symbol in module insmod: ERROR: could not insert module drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_acpi.ko: Unknown symbol in module when trying to insert the compiled modules. (ucsi_acpi is blacklisted at boot, but that does not sound like it is the problem so it was not unexpected that I got the following when trying to unload the existing modules rmmod: ERROR: Module ucsi_acpi is not currently loaded rmmod: ERROR: Module typec_ucsi is not currently loaded Happy to try again if there is something else I can do. Perhaps I really need to build a new kernel - time I learnt how to do that? -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #56 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Created attachment 306315 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306315=edit Fix patch -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #55 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Created attachment 306314 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306314=edit Debug patch -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #54 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Hello, The updated instructions are: - Get the kernel source from kernel.org (v6.9.1) and extract it to a folder. Download both debug.patch and fix.patch as well. - Extract the kernel tarball: tar xf linux-6.9.1.tar.xz - cd into the folder where the kernel was extracted and apply only debug.patch: git apply /path/to/debug.patch - Compile the modules with: make -C /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build M=$PWD/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ - Remove both ucsi_acpi and typec_ucsi: sudo rmmod ucsi_acpi sudo rmmod typec_ucsi - Insert the compiled versions of the modules (with all USB-C cables unplugged): sudo insmod drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/typec_ucsi.ko sudo insmod drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_acpi.ko Then follow the procedure I described in the previous instruction post to obtain the log file. When this is done - Apply fix.patch on top: git apply /path/to/fix.patch - Compile the modules with: make -C /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build M=$PWD/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ - Remove ucsi_acpi: sudo rmmod ucsi_acpi - Insert the updated version of the module (with all USB-C cables unplugged): sudo insmod drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_acpi.ko And again follow the procedure described above to get the log file. Hopefully these instructions are clear. If you need further clarification I'll be happy to help! Thanks, Diogo -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #53 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Hi Ralph, I guess the only option is to compile the kernel module from source. I'll place the patches and instructions here soon. Thanks, Diogo -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218864] HP Envy x360: Graphical corruption over time without amdgpu.sg_display=0 kernel option
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218864 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Component|BIOS|Video(DRI - non Intel) Assignee|acpi_b...@kernel-bugs.osdl. |drivers_video-dri@kernel-bu |org |gs.osdl.org Product|ACPI|Drivers -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218864] HP Envy x360: Graphical corruption over time without amdgpu.sg_display=0 kernel option
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218864 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DOCUMENTED --- Comment #1 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- For graphics bugs it's better to report them to https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues But yes if this is a Phoenix laptop you probably will need to get a BIOS upgrade. It's probably a duplicate of https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3187. You can read that for more details. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218864] HP Envy x360: Graphical corruption over time without amdgpu.sg_display=0 kernel option
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218864 Matthew (ruinairas1...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.limoncie...@amd.com, ||ruinairas1...@gmail.com -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218864] New: HP Envy x360: Graphical corruption over time without amdgpu.sg_display=0 kernel option
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218864 Bug ID: 218864 Summary: HP Envy x360: Graphical corruption over time without amdgpu.sg_display=0 kernel option Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: BIOS Assignee: acpi_b...@kernel-bugs.osdl.org Reporter: ruinairas1...@gmail.com Regression: No The screen will go white with black artifacts after a period of time that requires a reboot to fix. I believe this is a BIOS bug that will require a kernel workaround if HP does not ship out a fix. I suspect not all devices that have this issue will ever get a BIOS update so I am reporting this here for any quirks list that may be prepared. System information: Name: HP Envy x360 2-in-1 Laptop 14-fa0xxx Bios Version: F.01 Bios Date: 01/18/2024 Bios Release: 15.1 -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #52 from Ralph Martin (ra...@cs.cf.ac.uk) --- Hi Diogo, any suggestion how I can proceed beyond the error message I reported when trying to install your patched module? Thanks Ralph -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218853] ACPI: (UEFI?) Oops due to tables memmap wrong after S4 platform resume
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218853 --- Comment #1 from TJ (li...@iam.tj) --- Created attachment 306304 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306304=edit Data and analysis files Archive containing data and analysis files. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218853] New: ACPI: (UEFI?) Oops due to tables memmap wrong after S4 platform resume
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218853 Bug ID: 218853 Summary: ACPI: (UEFI?) Oops due to tables memmap wrong after S4 platform resume Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: AMD OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Config-Tables Assignee: acpi_config-tab...@kernel-bugs.osdl.org Reporter: li...@iam.tj Regression: No Subject: ACPI: (UEFI?) Oops due to tables memmap wrong after S4 platform resume Note: supporting files with complete logs, tables, and analysis are attached to the bug report (see end of text for detail). With all versions tested from v6.9 going back to v5.10 (and beyond) - mainline and Debian kernels - this issue occurs on a Lenovo E495s on doing "platform" resume from S4. An OS "shutdown" resume is not affected. This bug manifests as an Oops in acpi_cpufreq but extensive debugging reveals it is due to the ACPI tables memmap changing (some tables move 'up' by one 4K page) - we find that on resume /sys/firmware/acpi/tables/SSDT5 (containing the per-CPU performance states that acpi_cpufreq relies upon) actually contains CDAT and therefore appears corrupt: $ hexdump --length 16 -C 1-before-shutdown-hibernation/SSDT5 53 53 44 54 9c 11 00 00 01 5a 4c 45 4e 4f 56 4f |SSDT.ZLENOVO| $ hexdump --length 16 -C 4-after-resume-from-shutdown/SSDT5 43 52 41 54 10 08 00 00 01 5f 4c 45 4e 4f 56 4f |CRAT._LENOVO| [ 267.784456] acpi_cpufreq: overriding BIOS provided _PSD data [ 267.787251] ACPI: button: Power Button [PWRB] [ 267.790096] input: Lid Switch as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0C0D:00/input/input101 [ 267.791742] ACPI Error: Null stack entry at bc5560e1 (20220331/exresop-139) [ 267.792943] ACPI Error: AE_AML_INTERNAL, While resolving operands for [OpcodeName unavailable] (20220331/dswexec-431) [ 267.794270] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_PR.C003._PPC due to previous error (AE_AML_INTERNAL) (20220331/psparse-529) [ 267.795403] ACPI: \_PR_.C003: _PPC evaluation failed: AE_AML_INTERNAL [ 267.796803] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0008 [ 267.797993] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 267.799224] #PF: error_code(0x) - not-present page [ 267.800323] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 267.801382] Oops: [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [ 267.802551] CPU: 1 PID: 351 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.1.0-21-amd64 #1 Debian 6.1.90-1 [ 267.803753] Hardware name: LENOVO 20QKS0EQ0N/20QKS0EQ0N, BIOS R13ET56W(1.30 ) 03/01/2024 [ 267.804806] RIP: 0010:acpi_ex_resolve_multiple+0x2d/0x2c0 [ 267.805923] Code: 00 00 41 56 49 89 fe 41 55 49 89 d5 41 54 49 89 cc 55 53 48 89 f3 48 83 ec 18 65 48 8b 04 25 28 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 10 31 c0 <0f> b6 46 08 48 89 34 24 48 89 74 24 08 3c 0e 0f 84 28 01 00 00 3c [ 267.807081] RSP: 0018:b5ae41147958 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 267.808016] RAX: RBX: RCX: b5ae411479a8 [ 267.808978] RDX: b5ae411479a4 RSI: RDI: 8eb084d9e800 [ 267.809953] RBP: R08: b5ae411479a8 R09: 8eb08591beb0 [ 267.810071] ACPI: button: Lid Switch [LID] [ 267.811148] R10: 000f R11: b5ae41147a00 R12: b5ae411479a8 [ 267.811151] R13: b5ae411479a4 R14: 8eb084d9e800 R15: d5ae3fb35f48 [ 267.811154] FS: 7f64c7196900() GS:8eb330a4() knlGS: [ 267.815792] CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 80050033 [ 267.816957] CR2: 0008 CR3: 000100d46000 CR4: 003506e0 [ 267.818133] Call Trace: [ 267.819255] [ 267.820397] ? __die_body.cold+0x1a/0x1f [ 267.821538] ? page_fault_oops+0xd2/0x2b0 [ 267.822434] ? __alloc_pages+0x1dc/0x330 [ 267.823514] ? exc_page_fault+0x70/0x170 [ 267.824577] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 [ 267.826045] ? acpi_ex_resolve_multiple+0x2d/0x2c0 [ 267.827495] acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R+0x241/0x5a0 [ 267.828655] acpi_ds_exec_end_op+0x27e/0x510 [ 267.829865] acpi_ps_complete_final_op+0xa4/0x190 [ 267.831062] acpi_ps_parse_loop+0x2ed/0x6a0 [ 267.832320] acpi_ps_parse_aml+0x7c/0x3d0 [ 267.833382] acpi_ps_execute_method+0x13b/0x270 [ 267.834435] acpi_ns_evaluate+0x1ee/0x2d0 [ 267.835479] acpi_evaluate_object+0x149/0x2f0 [ 267.836517] acpi_evaluate_integer+0x6b/0xf0 [ 267.837544] acpi_processor_get_platform_limit+0x43/0x140 [ 267.838564] acpi_processor_register_performance+0x5d/0xd0 [ 267.839566] acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init+0x13c/0x8e0 [acpi_cpufreq] MS Windows 10 can successfully resume from S4 platform; we confirmed it was using platform mode, and S4 not S5, because a lid-open event wakes the PC. The firmware specifically supports Linux (OSI=Linux) and changelogs for firmware mention Linux support (v.130 change-log states "Fixed an issue that Linux TSC is unstable and system will hang after exit from Boot Menu" ). The diagnosis
[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 --- Comment #7 from Jacob Kaulike (kaul...@system76.com) --- Created attachment 306301 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306301=edit acpidump for ASRock WRX90 WS EVO Here's an acpidump for the WRX90 WS EVO motherboard from Pop!_OS 22.04. I had to compress it since it's ~6MB -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 --- Comment #6 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- Ah, got it. Thanks for checking. We *might* be best off reverting, but I'd like to see what Rafael and others have to say. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 --- Comment #5 from Martin Mokrejs (mmokr...@gmail.com) --- Mario, https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/30/128 that was year 2008 and my ASUS L3C/S laptop. I don't have it anymore. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 --- Comment #4 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- Jacob, Can you please add an acpidump and kernel log (from a faulty kernel without that revert) -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||suresh.b.sid...@intel.com -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 --- Comment #3 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- I CC'ed the original reporter, Martin to the bug. Martin - can you revert that on a current kernel and see if your original problem still exists? -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmokr...@gmail.com -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||robert.mo...@intel.com -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||raf...@kernel.org -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 --- Comment #2 from Jacob Kaulike (kaul...@system76.com) --- Yes, that is correct. Reverting that commit does fix this issue for us. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849
Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.limoncie...@amd.com
--- Comment #1 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
As I understand it, reverting
d410ee5109a1 ("ACPICA: avoid "Info: mapping multiple BARs. Your kernel is
fine."")
Which is the "fix" for https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14445 fixes
this issue, right?
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218849] New: ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 Bug ID: 218849 Summary: ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3 Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Power-Sleep-Wake Assignee: acpi_power-sleep-w...@kernel-bugs.osdl.org Reporter: kaul...@system76.com Regression: No Testing with Ubuntu 22.04.3 with 6.5.0 kernel, and Ubuntu 24.04 with 6.8.0 kernel, and also Pop!_OS 22.04 with the pop 6.8.0 kernel, the ASRock TRX90 WS EVO motherboard does not suspend. Instead when I attempt to suspend the display blanks, fans spin up, the board remains powered on, and the system becomes unresponsive. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218789] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: ucsi_acpi_dsm: failed to evaluate _DSM 2 in logs
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218789 Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@rjwysocki.net) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218789] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: ucsi_acpi_dsm: failed to evaluate _DSM 2 in logs
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218789 --- Comment #15 from Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@rjwysocki.net) --- Thanks for testing, much appreciated! However, note that the patch you tested has been replaced with: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/6046110.lOV4Wx5bFT@kreacher due to concerned related to the handling of some specific cases. Can you please test this one too, just to verify that it still helps? -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218829] B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218829
--- Comment #6 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
This looks like it's the EC trying to wake up the system.
Case (0x03)
{
M000 (0x3903)
M460 ("Clear SCI Status Bit02\n", Zero, Zero, Zero,
Zero, Zero, Zero)
M014 (0xFED80200, Zero, Zero, 0x20, 0x04)
If (CondRefOf (\_GPE._L02))
{
M460 ("Call \\_GPE._L02 ()\n", Zero, Zero, Zero,
Zero, Zero, Zero)
\_GPE._L02 ()
}
}
Check and make sure that your BIOS and EC firmware is up to date. If it is you
probably should report this to your vendor to investigate and explain.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218829] B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218829 --- Comment #5 from CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) --- Created attachment 306296 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306296=edit dsdt.dsl -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218829] B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218829
--- Comment #4 from CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) ---
I did a quick and dirty modification on acpica code to bypass the error and get
dsdt.dat decompiled. Hopefully it doesn't distort things significantly.
```
diff --git a/source/components/dispatcher/dswload.c
b/source/components/dispatcher/dswload.c
index ed97abb13..b2af9b40c 100644
--- a/source/components/dispatcher/dswload.c
+++ b/source/components/dispatcher/dswload.c
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ AcpiDsLoad1BeginOp (
{
/* The name already exists in this scope */
-if (Node->Flags & ANOBJ_IS_EXTERNAL)
+//if (Node->Flags & ANOBJ_IS_EXTERNAL)
{
/*
* Allow one create on an object or segment that was
```
Here is the _AEI method found in the dsdt.dsl (full file attached).
```
Method (_AEI, 0, NotSerialized) // _AEI: ACPI Event Interrupts
{
Name (BUFF, ResourceTemplate ()
{
GpioInt (Edge, ActiveLow, ExclusiveAndWake, PullNone, 0x,
"\\_SB.GPIO", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
)
{ // Pin list
0x0003
}
})
Name (BUNP, ResourceTemplate ()
{
GpioInt (Edge, ActiveHigh, ExclusiveAndWake, PullDefault,
0x1388,
"\\_SB.GPIO", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
)
{ // Pin list
0x
}
GpioInt (Level, ActiveHigh, ExclusiveAndWake, PullNone, 0x,
"\\_SB.GPIO", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
)
{ // Pin list
0x003D
}
GpioInt (Level, ActiveHigh, ExclusiveAndWake, PullNone, 0x,
"\\_SB.GPIO", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
)
{ // Pin list
0x003E
}
GpioInt (Level, ActiveHigh, ExclusiveAndWake, PullNone, 0x,
"\\_SB.GPIO", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
)
{ // Pin list
0x003A
}
GpioInt (Level, ActiveHigh, ExclusiveAndWake, PullNone, 0x,
"\\_SB.GPIO", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
)
{ // Pin list
0x003B
}
GpioInt (Edge, ActiveLow, ExclusiveAndWake, PullNone, 0x,
"\\_SB.GPIO", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
)
{ // Pin list
0x0002
}
GpioInt (Edge, ActiveLow, ExclusiveAndWake, PullNone, 0x,
"\\_SB.GPIO", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
)
{ // Pin list
0x0003
}
GpioInt (Edge, ActiveLow, ExclusiveAndWake, PullNone, 0x,
"\\_SB.GPIO", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
)
{ // Pin list
0x0009
}
})
If ((G001 == One))
{
M460 (" OEM-ASL-\\_SB.GPIO._AEI return BUNP (MS)\n", Zero,
Zero, Zero, Zero, Zero, Zero)
Return (BUNP) /* \_SB_.GPIO._AEI.BUNP */
}
Else
{
M460 (" OEM-ASL-\\_SB.GPIO._AEI return BUFF (S3)\n", Zero,
Zero, Zero, Zero, Zero, Zero)
Return (BUFF) /* \_SB_.GPIO._AEI.BUFF */
}
}
```
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218829] B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218829 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.limoncie...@amd.com --- Comment #3 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- I can't seem to decompile your DSDT. $ iasl -d dsdt.dat Intel ACPI Component Architecture ASL+ Optimizing Compiler/Disassembler version 20230628 Copyright (c) 2000 - 2023 Intel Corporation File appears to be binary: found 85251 non-ASCII characters, disassembling Binary file appears to be a valid ACPI table, disassembling Input file dsdt.dat, Length 0x72C22 (470050) bytes ACPI: DSDT 0x 072C22 (v39 ALASKA A M I01072009 INTL 20220331) Pass 1 parse of [DSDT] Firmware Error (ACPI): Failure creating named object [\_SB.PCI0.GPP7.UP00], AE_ALREADY_EXISTS (20230628/dswload-495) ACPI Error: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20230628/psobject-372) Could not parse ACPI tables, AE_ALREADY_EXISTS If you can get that decompiled then the _AEI will likely have information useful for figuring out what it matches. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217950] [Regression] S3 Sleep Mode failures since Linux 6.x on Dell Inspiron 15 5593
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217950 --- Comment #11 from The Linux kernel's regression tracker (Thorsten Leemhuis) (regressi...@leemhuis.info) --- (In reply to Arnas from comment #10) > I might be able to pull out my old NVMe with Arch for testing, it should > still boot fine. Might complicate things, *if* the NVMe device is part of the problem. > (Although I have a feeling it will make no difference) Yeah, it's unlikely, but it's worth a shot. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217950] [Regression] S3 Sleep Mode failures since Linux 6.x on Dell Inspiron 15 5593
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217950 --- Comment #10 from Arnas (arnasz...@gmail.com) --- Well, I swapped my NVMe, went from Arch+Win10 to Fedora+Win11. Since I was swapping SSDs, I also updated my Windows and swapped to Fedora as main. I might be able to pull out my old NVMe with Arch for testing, it should still boot fine. (Hopefully I can get it to boot from external SSD? I don't want to take apart my laptop again) I can try 6.9 on Fedora, will do so and report back. (Although I have a feeling it will make no difference) -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217950] [Regression] S3 Sleep Mode failures since Linux 6.x on Dell Inspiron 15 5593
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217950 --- Comment #9 from The Linux kernel's regression tracker (Thorsten Leemhuis) (regressi...@leemhuis.info) --- (In reply to Arnas from comment #7) > So, I do think this is a upstream kernel issue. Anyway, it's summer break - > is there anything you want me to do? Try at least 6.9 now; you can get it for Fedora from these repos: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Kernel_Vanilla_Repositories > I don't know if I can really roll back > anymore, since I don't have my Arch install with the old 5.x kernel. Without a bisection (https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/verify-bugs-and-bisect-regressions.html ) I guess no developer will look into this. Maybe try to compile a 5.15 kernel yourself using a .config file from the time when Fedora used such a version (might be possible to extract from old RPMs found in the build system: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8 ), with a bit of luck it will boot. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217950] [Regression] S3 Sleep Mode failures since Linux 6.x on Dell Inspiron 15 5593
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217950 --- Comment #8 from Arnas (arnasz...@gmail.com) --- Same exact issues as well in the log file after closing lid: (Attempt 1, successful sleep): May 14 08:17:30 fediron kernel: ACPI Error: Thread 3438522176 cannot release Mutex [ECMX] acquired by thread 3239915328 (20230628/exmutex-378) May 14 08:17:30 fediron kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPCB.ECDV._Q66 due to previous error (AE_AML_NOT_OWNER) (20230628/psparse-5> (Attempt 2, unsuccessful sleep): May 14 08:18:24 fediron kernel: ACPI Error: Thread 3439165440 cannot release Mutex [ECMX] acquired by thread 3411128128 (20230628/exmutex-378) May 14 08:18:24 fediron kernel: ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.LPCB.ECDV._Q66 due to previous error (AE_AML_NOT_OWNER) (20230628/psparse-5> May 14 08:18:25 fediron kernel: Non-boot CPUs are not disabled -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217950] [Regression] S3 Sleep Mode failures since Linux 6.x on Dell Inspiron 15 5593
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217950 --- Comment #7 from Arnas (arnasz...@gmail.com) --- Alright, so quick status update, I switched to Fedora Linux 40 since I needed it for a few things, and got rid of my Arch install. Current kernel is 6.8.9-300.fc40.x86_64, and annoyingly enough, this issue still occurs on the laptop, even though this is a different distro and a fresh install. So, I do think this is a upstream kernel issue. Anyway, it's summer break - is there anything you want me to do? I don't know if I can really roll back anymore, since I don't have my Arch install with the old 5.x kernel. All I can confirm rn is that latest kernel indeed has the issue, and it seems to occur on any and all Linux distros. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218829] B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218829 --- Comment #2 from CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) --- Found this https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221012221028.4817-1-mario.limoncie...@amd.com/T/ Setting gpiolib_acpi.ignore_interrupt=AMDI0030:00@3 fixes the issue. Though I still wonder what GPIO 3 does and if there is any caveat of this workaround. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218829] B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218829 CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Kernel Version||6.8.9 -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218829] B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218829 --- Comment #1 from CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) --- Created attachment 306288 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306288=edit dmesg -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218829] New: B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218829
Bug ID: 218829
Summary: B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep"
suspend
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
Hardware: AMD
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: Power-Sleep-Wake
Assignee: acpi_power-sleep-w...@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
Reporter: cuihao@gmail.com
Regression: No
Created attachment 306287
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306287=edit
acpidump
Hi, my PC wakes up immediately after suspend to RAM on Linux. I believe the
system does a full cycle of suspend / waking up, which I tell from the kernel
log and the sound / noise from the chassis.
Hardware:
- B650M AORUS ELITE AX
- AMD Ryzen 7 7700X 8-Core Processor
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (nvidia-open driver, not used for display)
I tried to disable all possible device wakeups under /sys but it doesn't work:
```
find /sys/ -type f -path '*/power/wakeup' | xargs -I{} sh -c 'echo disabled |
tee {}'
```
/sys/power/pm_wakeup_irq shows IRQ 7 wakes the system up.
I followed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162013 and a few other
sources, turned on a few debug options, including:
```
alias ddcmd='echo $* > /proc/dynamic_debug/control'
ddcmd file "drivers/pinctrl/*" +p
echo 1 > /sys/power/pm_debug_messages
```
Here are the kernel log I got during one the suspend / waking up cycle:
```
[ 1695.970527] r8169 :0b:00.0 enp11s0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow
control off
[ 1696.118462] r8169 :0b:00.0 enp11s0: Link is Down
[ 1696.318138] PM: suspend entry (deep)
[ 1696.373499] Filesystems sync: 0.055 seconds
[ 1696.577890] Freezing user space processes
[ 1696.579521] Freezing user space processes completed (elapsed 0.001 seconds)
[ 1696.579523] OOM killer disabled.
[ 1696.579524] Freezing remaining freezable tasks
[ 1696.580708] Freezing remaining freezable tasks completed (elapsed 0.001
seconds)
[ 1696.580735] printk: Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
[ 1696.636172] sd 1:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache
[ 1696.636546] ata2.00: Entering standby power mode
[ 1696.843467] amdgpu :10:00.0: [drm] REG_WAIT timeout 1us * 10 tries -
optc1_wait_for_state line:839
[ 1696.979856] amdgpu :10:00.0: [drm] REG_WAIT timeout 1us * 10 tries -
optc1_wait_for_state line:839
[ 1697.116228] amdgpu :10:00.0: [drm] REG_WAIT timeout 1us * 10 tries -
optc1_wait_for_state line:839
[ 1698.352257] PM: suspend of devices complete after 1771.335 msecs
[ 1698.352266] PM: start suspend of devices complete after 1771.558 msecs
[ 1698.353325] PM: late suspend of devices complete after 1.056 msecs
[ 1698.406152] PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 52.722 msecs
[ 1698.406156] ACPI: PM: Preparing to enter system sleep state S3
[ 1698.609679] Bluetooth: hci0: command 0x0c24 tx timeout
[ 1698.609678] Bluetooth: hci0: Opcode 0x0c24 failed: -110
[ 1698.719574] ACPI: PM: Saving platform NVS memory
[ 1698.720102] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
[ 1698.722241] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
[ 1698.724935] smpboot: CPU 2 is now offline
[ 1698.726960] smpboot: CPU 3 is now offline
[ 1698.729099] smpboot: CPU 4 is now offline
[ 1698.731128] smpboot: CPU 5 is now offline
[ 1698.733129] smpboot: CPU 6 is now offline
[ 1698.735205] smpboot: CPU 7 is now offline
[ 1698.737130] smpboot: CPU 8 is now offline
[ 1698.737735] Spectre V2 : Update user space SMT mitigation: STIBP off
[ 1698.739156] smpboot: CPU 9 is now offline
[ 1698.741135] smpboot: CPU 10 is now offline
[ 1698.742915] smpboot: CPU 11 is now offline
[ 1698.744750] smpboot: CPU 12 is now offline
[ 1698.746658] smpboot: CPU 13 is now offline
[ 1698.748377] smpboot: CPU 14 is now offline
[ 1698.750075] smpboot: CPU 15 is now offline
[ 1698.750602] Checking wakeup interrupts
[ 1698.750603] Calling kvm_suspend+0x0/0x40 [kvm]
[ 1698.750627] Calling mce_syscore_suspend+0x0/0x20
[ 1698.750630] Calling ledtrig_cpu_syscore_suspend+0x0/0x20
[ 1698.750632] Calling timekeeping_suspend+0x0/0x2f0
[ 1698.750662] Calling irq_gc_suspend+0x0/0x80
[ 1698.750664] Calling save_ioapic_entries+0x0/0xd0
[ 1698.750771] Calling i8259A_suspend+0x0/0x30
[ 1698.750782] Calling perf_ibs_suspend+0x0/0x40
[ 1698.750784] Calling amd_iommu_suspend+0x0/0x50
[ 1698.750791] Calling fw_suspend+0x0/0x20
[ 1698.750796] Calling acpi_save_bm_rld+0x0/0x30
[ 1698.750800] Calling lapic_suspend+0x0/0x1a0
[ 1698.750920] ACPI: PM: Low-level resume complete
[ 1698.750942] ACPI: PM: Restoring platform NVS memory
[ 1698.751107] Calling lapic_resume+0x0/0x220
[ 1698.801774] AMD-Vi: Virtual APIC enabled
[ 1698.801781] Calling acpi_restore_bm_rld+0x0/0x70
[ 1698.801790] Calling irqrouter_resume+0x0/0x50
[ 1698.801793] Calling amd_iommu_resume+0x0/0x40
[ 1699.002213] AMD-Vi: Virtual APIC enabled
[ 1699.002220] Calling perf_ibs_resume+0x0/0x30
[ 1699.002226] LVT offset
[Bug 218789] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: ucsi_acpi_dsm: failed to evaluate _DSM 2 in logs
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218789 --- Comment #14 from webcaptcha (webcap...@gmail.com) --- I have added logs with patch included in case you want to take a look. Thanks! -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218789] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: ucsi_acpi_dsm: failed to evaluate _DSM 2 in logs
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218789 --- Comment #13 from webcaptcha (webcap...@gmail.com) --- Created attachment 306286 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306286=edit acpi-with-patch.dump -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218789] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: ucsi_acpi_dsm: failed to evaluate _DSM 2 in logs
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218789 --- Comment #12 from webcaptcha (webcap...@gmail.com) --- Created attachment 306285 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306285=edit dmesq-with-patch-logs -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218789] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: ucsi_acpi_dsm: failed to evaluate _DSM 2 in logs
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218789 --- Comment #11 from webcaptcha (webcap...@gmail.com) --- Feel free if I need to test something specially -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218789] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: ucsi_acpi_dsm: failed to evaluate _DSM 2 in logs
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218789
--- Comment #10 from webcaptcha (webcap...@gmail.com) ---
Hi Rafael J. Wysocki
Thank you for joining.
Looks like the patch did actually help to fix errors in journalctl. Woohoo!
With the help of one guy (@loqs) from the Arch forum I was able to get a kernel
build (6.8.9) with this patch included,
source=(
https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v${pkgver%%.*}.x/${_srcname}.tar.{xz,sign}
$url/releases/download/$_srctag/linux-$_srctag.patch.zst{,.sig}
'4926735.31r3eYUQgx@kreacher.patch::https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/4926735.31r3eYUQgx@kreacher/raw'
config # the main kernel config file
With this custom Kernel I don't see errors anymore and at the first look
everything is working as it should be.
Many thanks to you folks @Rafael J. Wysocki, @Heikki Krogerus
Looking forward to see this patch in a main Kernel branch. (hope I expressed
myself correctly).
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218789] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: ucsi_acpi_dsm: failed to evaluate _DSM 2 in logs
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218789 Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@rjwysocki.net) changed: What|Removed |Added Component|USB |EC Assignee|drivers_...@kernel-bugs.ker |acpi...@kernel-bugs.osdl.or |nel.org |g Product|Drivers |ACPI -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 2148] ACPI: No IRQ known ... - using IRQ 255
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2148 Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Regression|--- |No -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #51 from Ralph Martin (ra...@cs.cf.ac.uk) --- I also tried 6.5 and 6.6 series kernels, with the same outcome. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #50 from Ralph Martin (ra...@cs.cf.ac.uk) --- OK, I used mokutil to turn off secure boot, but when I tried to insert the old version of your module I got insmod: ERROR: could not insert module ucsi_acpi_old.ko: Invalid module format and in the log module ucsi_acpi: .gnu.linkonce.this_module section size must match the kernel's built struct module size at run time uname -a reports I am running the following kernel on debian testing Linux gram 6.7.12-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.7.12-1 (2024-04-24) x86_64 GNU/Linux -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #49 from Ralph Martin (ra...@cs.cf.ac.uk) --- Model 16Z90Q-K.AD78A1 Unfortunately, I get the below trying to unload then insert your (old) module: rmmod: ERROR: Module ucsi_acpi is not currently loaded insmod: ERROR: could not insert module ucsi_acpi_old.ko: Key was rejected by service The first message is presumably because I had originally blacklisted the module. The second also resulted in the following in the dmesg window: Loading of unsigned module is rejected I guess this is because I am using secure boot. Is there anything else I can do (can I disable secure boot on a temporary basis?) -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #48 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Ok, I have submitted two versions of the kernel module: ucsi_acpi_old.ko and ucsi_acpi_fix.ko. Both of them print debug messages to dmesg. Important: These should only fix the problem for laptops with a model like xxZ90Qxx (example: 16Z90Q-); if your model does not contain the exact string Z90Q then you can skip the following for now and please let me know what your exact model number is so that I can add support for those models as well. In order to use them you need to: Download modules, place them somewhere and cd to that folder, then open a terminal on that folder and, with everything unplugged from USB-C ports, do: sudo dmesg -w // Do this in another terminal window sudo rmmod ucsi_acpi sudo insmod -f ucsi_acpi_old.ko // Insert the stock module with debug info Let it finish outputting things to dmesg and then connect something to a USB-C port, wait a few seconds and then disconnect. Collect the logs from that to a file Then: sudo rmmod ucsi_acpi sudo insmod -f ucsi_acpi_fix.ko // Insert the (hopefully) fixed module with debug info Again, let it finish outputting things to dmesg and then connect something to a USB-C port, wait a few seconds and then disconnect. Collect the logs from that to a file. Finally, sudo rmmod ucsi_acpi When all of this is done please send the files to this thread so that I can see if this is working. Thank you for testing this, it is really helpful :) -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #47 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Created attachment 306278 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306278=edit Fixed ucsi_acpi kernel module with debug prints -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #46 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Created attachment 306277 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306277=edit Stock ucsi_acpi kernel module with debug prints -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #45 from Ralph Martin (ra...@cs.cf.ac.uk) --- Hi Diogo, it would probably be easier for many of us if you could provide the module and instructions on how to use it... Thanks. Ralph -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #44 from Víctor (victor.ballester.r...@gmail.com) --- Same for me, but I don't know how I can compile the kernel by myself. I usually use zen kernel. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #43 from PinkFromTheFuture (eduardoxfurt...@gmail.com) --- Great news! But could you also provide instructions on how to easily do what you are asking us to do? I would be happy to help, but I don't have time to tinker with it too much right now. I imagine we should also disable the workarounds that we put into place? On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 8:42 AM wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 > > --- Comment #42 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- > Hello, > > I think I have a fix for this problem and would like your help in > confirming > that the fix does indeed work and to collect all of the affected models. > For > that I would really appreciate that everyone that is able to compile and > run > their own kernel tries out the patch in the link below [1] and to report > their > findings here, namely if it worked or not and the specific model of the > laptop. > I can also provide a compiled kernel module with the patch applied if that > is > more convenient. > > Thanks! > > [1]: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/5qc55gruhn4pmutiukohauki5dehba6n2k22jgvpt7i3hafkon@v2ng2a33o7vv/T/#u > > -- > You may reply to this email to add a comment. > > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #42 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Hello, I think I have a fix for this problem and would like your help in confirming that the fix does indeed work and to collect all of the affected models. For that I would really appreciate that everyone that is able to compile and run their own kernel tries out the patch in the link below [1] and to report their findings here, namely if it worked or not and the specific model of the laptop. I can also provide a compiled kernel module with the patch applied if that is more convenient. Thanks! [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/5qc55gruhn4pmutiukohauki5dehba6n2k22jgvpt7i3hafkon@v2ng2a33o7vv/T/#u -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 2148] ACPI: No IRQ known ... - using IRQ 255
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2148 jackson daws (kewav53...@rencr.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kewav53...@rencr.com --- Comment #7 from jackson daws (kewav53...@rencr.com) --- Dive into the fast-paced action of Color Tunnel 2, where quick reflexes and sharp focus are essential for mastering the ever-changing tunnels. https://colort2.netlify.app/ -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 fraz...@hotmail.it changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fraz...@hotmail.it -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Luis (lgtso...@yahoo.com.br) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lgtso...@yahoo.com.br --- Comment #88 from Luis (lgtso...@yahoo.com.br) --- I consider this problem serious, I have 2 hard drives that are lost. This error over time only increases the number of lines with this problem, until finally Busybox appears asking to build the shell, where as a lay Linux supporter I don't know what to do! I have 3 machines with Linux, and this appears on all of them from the moment they are installed. I would like to know a solution to solve this and not lose each installed disk! Is there a way to resolve this? APT UPDATE doesn't work! Is this a Mint problem?? Why do I only have this distribution? Does it also occur in Unbutu or elsewhere? Sorry for using Google Translater! -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218750] Regression: S0ix sleep broken on 13th Gen Lenovo laptops
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218750 Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwrdego...@fedoraproject.or ||g -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218767] New: Battery trip point default is design capacity of warning but should be design capacity of low
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218767 Bug ID: 218767 Summary: Battery trip point default is design capacity of warning but should be design capacity of low Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Power-Battery Assignee: acpi_power-batt...@kernel-bugs.osdl.org Reporter: snafu...@gmail.com Regression: No The default battery trip point is set to design capacity of warning: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/9d1ddab261f3e2af7c384dc02238784ce0cf9f98/drivers/acpi/battery.c#L654 There are two issues: 1. ACPI spec says design capacity of warning should trigger OS notification through the UI. It says nothing about the system doing anything or triggering sleep, so this value should be irrelevant as far as kernel behaviour is concerned. 2. Windows ignores design capacity of warning. If Windows ignores it OEMs will inevitably not test it properly. Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/component-guidelines/acpi-battery-and-power-subsystem-firmware-implementation Setting battery trip point to design capacity of low matches ACPI spec and aligns to Windows so is more likely properly tested by OEMs. Supporting point 2 is this note: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/9d1ddab261f3e2af7c384dc02238784ce0cf9f98/drivers/acpi/battery.c#L509-L510 -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218750] Regression: S0ix sleep broken on 13th Gen Lenovo laptops
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218750 Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@rjwysocki.net) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||r...@rjwysocki.net Resolution|--- |PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE --- Comment #4 from Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@rjwysocki.net) --- Patch posted: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/12427214.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher/ -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218750] Regression: S0ix sleep broken on 13th Gen Lenovo laptops
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218750
--- Comment #3 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) ---
Yup, try this. If that works I'd say, go ahead and post a patch for Rafael to
review. It's better than a revert.
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
index cd84af23f7ea..3da2f075711e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
@@ -488,21 +488,6 @@ static int lps0_device_attach(struct acpi_device *adev,
rev_id = 1;
lps0_dsm_func_mask = validate_dsm(adev->handle,
ACPI_LPS0_DSM_UUID, rev_id,
_dsm_guid);
- if (lps0_dsm_func_mask > 0 && lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft > 0)
{
- unsigned int func_mask;
-
- /*
-* Avoid evaluating the same _DSM function for two
-* different UUIDs and prioritize the MSFT one.
-*/
- func_mask = lps0_dsm_func_mask &
lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft;
- if (func_mask) {
- acpi_handle_info(adev->handle,
-"Duplicate LPS0 _DSM functions
(mask: 0x%x)\n",
-func_mask);
- lps0_dsm_func_mask &= ~func_mask;
- }
- }
}
if (lps0_dsm_func_mask < 0 && lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft < 0)
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218750] Regression: S0ix sleep broken on 13th Gen Lenovo laptops
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218750 --- Comment #2 from Mark Pearson (mpearson-len...@squebb.ca) --- Created attachment 306196 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306196=edit ACPI dump Thanks Mario for the suggestion. acpidump attached -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218750] Regression: S0ix sleep broken on 13th Gen Lenovo laptops
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218750 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.limoncie...@amd.com --- Comment #1 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- I think you should attach an acpidump from an affected system. Something notable about that commit that is different between Intel and AMD is the Intel case avoids evaluation of the same DSM with multiple UUIDs. Depending upon what the firmware actually does in the different cases perhaps that's the root of why this commit causes issues. You could try to change it to behave like the way AMD does and let it evaluate both Microsoft and Intel paths if both are present instead of prioritizing to see if this theory has any legs. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218750] New: Regression: S0ix sleep broken on 13th Gen Lenovo laptops
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218750 Bug ID: 218750 Summary: Regression: S0ix sleep broken on 13th Gen Lenovo laptops Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: Intel OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocking Priority: P3 Component: Power-Sleep-Wake Assignee: acpi_power-sleep-w...@kernel-bugs.osdl.org Reporter: mpearson-len...@squebb.ca Regression: No Hi, S0ix sleep is broken on X1 Carbon G11 and X1 Yoga G8 platforms (Raptorlake CPU). Still checking if other platforms from that generation are impacted. Bisect is pointing at: [banther@x1c11 linux]$ git bisect bad 073237281a508ac80ec025872ad7de50cfb5a28a is the first bad commit commit 073237281a508ac80ec025872ad7de50cfb5a28a Author: Rafael J. Wysocki Date: Tue Feb 6 20:33:45 2024 +0100 ACPI: PM: s2idle: Enable Low-Power S0 Idle MSFT UUID for non-AMD systems Systems based on Intel platforms that use the MSFT UUID for Low-Power S0 Idle (LPS0) have started to ship, so allow the kernel to use the MSFT UUID in the non-AMD case too, but in that case make it avoid evaluating the same _DSM function for two different UUIDs and prioritize the MSFT one. While at it, combine two MSFT _DSM function mask checks in acpi_s2idle_restore_early() so as to make it reflect the acpi_s2idle_prepare_late() flow more closely and adjust the Modern Standby entry and exit comments slightly. Non-AMD systems that do not support MSFT UUID for Low-power S0 Idle are not expected to be affected by this change in any way. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c | 37 +++-- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) I did some sanity checking and confirmed that if I force lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft = -EINVAL that S0ix works again. Can this change be reverted while we figure out how to fix this please? I'm happy to help with any testing, and can pull in Lenovo FW teams if FW level fixes are needed (with a note that those will take time, and I think this has to be reverted from 6.9 until the issue is root caused and understood). I'll note that I'm not seeing any problems on the Meteorlake system I have - so it may be platform or CPU version specific. I've not had time to confirm Thanks to Hans de Goede for notifying me of the issue in the 6.9-rc builds. Mark -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218557] Kernel regression in acpi/ec.c causing some AMD platforms to limit CPU frequency to < 544Mhz
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218557 Pedro (voidpointertonull+kernelorgbugzi...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||voidpointertonull+kernelorg ||bugzi...@gmail.com -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Dimitris (dimitris.on.li...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimitris.on.li...@gmail.com -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 --- Comment #10 from Quentin Smith (qsm...@gmail.com) --- (In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #8) > Quentin, can you try Stephen's suggestion above in comment 4 instead? > > I think that's more desirable if that works instead. To raise the limit a bit? That might fix the Framework 16, but the same problem would exist on any other laptop that has invalid limits. Why is that more desirable? In any event, it looks like Rafael's patch is queued up for 6.9. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@rjwysocki.net) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED CC||r...@rjwysocki.net Resolution|--- |PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE --- Comment #9 from Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@rjwysocki.net) --- Patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/sy4p282mb3063a002007a252337a416dec5...@sy4p282mb3063.ausp282.prod.outlook.com/ -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218545] Multiple distros crash and reboot when trying to resume from sleep/suspend on laptop
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218545 Armin Wolf (w_ar...@gmx.de) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||w_ar...@gmx.de --- Comment #1 from Armin Wolf (w_ar...@gmx.de) --- Can you check if this still happens after blacklisting "vboxdrv"? -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.limoncie...@amd.com --- Comment #8 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- Quentin, can you try Stephen's suggestion above in comment 4 instead? I think that's more desirable if that works instead. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 --- Comment #7 from Quentin Smith (qsm...@gmail.com) --- Created attachment 306063 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306063=edit Test patch for 6.8.x I tried Mario's patch from bug 218652; unfortunately it doesn't cleanly apply to 6.8.x (it looks like this code changed on master only a week ago). I made a corresponding patch for 6.8.x, and with this patch the sensors are back (though obviously the temperature thresholds are still bogus). Probably Mario's patch will work correctly on master, but I didn't want to run a true bleeding edge kernel in case other things are broken differently. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218652] acpitz sensors regression on Linux 6.7+ on Framework 16
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218652 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 218586 *** -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qsm...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- *** Bug 218652 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218652] acpitz sensors regression on Linux 6.7+ on Framework 16
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218652 Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|a...@gmx.com| -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218652] acpitz sensors regression on Linux 6.7+ on Framework 16
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218652 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.limoncie...@amd.com --- Comment #2 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- Created attachment 306058 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306058=edit possible patch Can you see if this patch helps? -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218652] acpitz sensors regression on Linux 6.7+ on Framework 16
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218652 Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@gmx.com Regression|No |Yes --- Comment #1 from Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) --- > I believe that was caused by this commit: Can you confirm reverting this commit fixes the issue for you? -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218652] acpitz sensors regression on Linux 6.7+ on Framework 16
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218652 Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r...@rjwysocki.net -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 --- Comment #5 from The Linux kernel's regression tracker (Thorsten Leemhuis) (regressi...@leemhuis.info) --- Let me at this to the regression tracker to ensure it does not fall through the cracks: #regzbot introduced: 9c8647224e9fabb765019193a #regzbot title: ACPI: thermal_lib: no ACPI Thermal Zones anymore #regzbot fix: ACPI: thermal_lib: Continue registering thermal zones even if trip points fail validation #regzbot monitor: https://lore.kernel.org/all/sy4p282mb3063ee2cc37bd0ef2318b746c5...@sy4p282mb3063.ausp282.prod.outlook.com/ -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 paul idle (pid...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pid...@gmx.com --- Comment #87 from paul idle (pid...@gmx.com) --- I'd like to report one more instance of this bug. BUT perhaps more importantly pass on a condition that seems to trigger these ACPI errors at boot time (which you may or may not realize) and which might affect your continued approach to fixing. I use an old Dell t7400 and just recently decided to activate their TPM (trusted platform module) in my bios. I had never received any of these boot ACPI errors until I activated the TPM (which uses the broadcom LAN chip for crypto key generation). Immediately after activation, the ACPI errors unique to my system were reported at boot through dmesg. Upon deactivation AND DISABLING the TPM function (there are 2 distinct steps needed) the boot time ACPI errors cease being reported. === ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU7._PCT.CFGD], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) ACPI Error: Aborting method \_PR.CPU6._PCT due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210730/psparse-529) ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU6._PCT.CFGD], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) and repeated for each core to 0 .. ACPI Error: Aborting method \_PR.CPU0._PCT due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20210730/psparse-529) ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._PCT.CFGD], AE_NOT_FOUND (20210730/psargs-330) my relevant machine info Kernel: 5.15.0-100-generic x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 11.4.0 Desktop: Cinnamon 6.0.4 tk: GTK 3.24.33 wm: muffin vt: 7 dm: LightDM 1.30.0 Distro: Linux Mint 21.3 Virginia base: Ubuntu 22.04 jammy Machine: Type: Desktop System: Dell product: Precision WorkStation T7400 v: N/A serial: Chassis: type: 7 serial: Mobo: Dell model: 0RW199 serial: BIOS: Dell v: A11 date: 04/30/2012 CPU: Info: 2x 4-core model: Intel Xeon E5450 bits: 64 type: MCP SMP smt: arch: Core Yorkfield rev: A cache: L1: 2x 256 KiB (512 KiB) L2: 2x 12 MiB (24 MiB) Speed (MHz): avg: 2693 high: 3591 min/max: 2000/3000 cores: 1: 3591 2: 2394 3: 2394 4: 2394 5: 3591 6: 2394 7: 2394 8: 2394 bogomips: 57457 Flags: ht lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 ssse3 vmx Network: Device-1: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5754 Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express vendor: Dell driver: tg3 v: kernel pcie: speed: 2.5 GT/s lanes: 1 port: N/A bus-ID: 08:00.0 chip-ID: 14e4:167a class-ID: 0200 = I hope this is useful information. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218652] New: acpitz sensors regression on Linux 6.7+ on Framework 16
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218652 Bug ID: 218652 Summary: acpitz sensors regression on Linux 6.7+ on Framework 16 Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Power-Thermal Assignee: acpi_power-ther...@kernel-bugs.osdl.org Reporter: qsm...@gmail.com Regression: No After upgrading from 6.1.78 to 6.8.1, I discovered that the `acpitz-*` sensors had gone missing. I believe that was caused by this commit: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/f04256a8f7de2c13619b636cec1109e596804229 because the kernel is now logging at boot: ``` ACPI: thermal: [Firmware Bug]: Invalid critical threshold (-274000) ACPI: thermal: [Firmware Bug]: No valid trip points! ACPI: thermal: [Firmware Bug]: Invalid critical threshold (-274000) ACPI: thermal: [Firmware Bug]: No valid trip points! ACPI: thermal: [Firmware Bug]: Invalid critical threshold (-274000) ACPI: thermal: [Firmware Bug]: No valid trip points! ACPI: thermal: [Firmware Bug]: Invalid critical threshold (-274000) ACPI: thermal: [Firmware Bug]: No valid trip points! ``` If I’m reading the laptop's DSDT correctly, the `_HOT` threshold is reported as 0x1218 (463.2 degrees) and the `_CRT` threshold is 0x12E0 (483.2 degrees). The old code would always create the thermal zones, but after that commit the kernel ignores any threshold above 448 degrees as implausibly high, and if there were no valid thresholds it ignores the whole thermal zone. Even if there are no plausible thresholds, the thermal zone should still be created so the sensor values can be read. I reported this in the Framework forum at https://community.frame.work/t/firmware-bug-acpi-table-error-causes-missing-sensors-on-linux-6-7/47767, but Mario Limonciello from AMD asked me to file an upstream bug since the commit message says "No intentional functional impact." -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218444] Lenovo Legion 9i Audio, TrackPad, Battery not detected
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218444 Andy Shevchenko (andy.shevche...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andy.shevche...@gmail.com Component|ACPICA-Core |x86-64 Assignee|acpi_acpica-core@kernel-bug |platform_x86_64@kernel-bugs |s.osdl.org |.osdl.org Product|ACPI|Platform Specific/Hardware --- Comment #16 from Andy Shevchenko (andy.shevche...@gmail.com) --- (In reply to Mateusz Kaduk from comment #15) > Follow up, apparently this TouchPad device It's not a TouchPad, it's an I²C host controller that most likely has that device (TP) being connected to. > Anyways, I am sure sure if this thread gets required attention from > developers, or anyone able to help, so maybe switching back to Lenovo forum > can get us some help? For that you need to add correct people to the list. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 patrickc...@outlook.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||patrickc...@outlook.com --- Comment #86 from patrickc...@outlook.com --- Also have this bug. Kernel: 5.15.0.91. Cpu: Intel N3530. Kubuntu 5.27.4. Dual-boot laptop with windows 10. First started seeing this with an earlier Kubuntu version but unfortunately don't know which one, it may have been since 2021 or even earlier. Also have intermittent power-offs with no warning, but don't know if that's related/relevant. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Stephen Horvath (s.horv...@outlook.com.au) changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #306004|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #4 from Stephen Horvath (s.horv...@outlook.com.au) --- Created attachment 306005 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306005=edit Raise the max temperature of ACPI trip temps to 488K (215°C) Sorry I thought I might make it a proper patch rather than a diff. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 --- Comment #3 from Stephen Horvath (s.horv...@outlook.com.au) --- Created attachment 306004 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306004=edit Raise the max temperature of ACPI trip temps to 488K (215°C) -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Stephen Horvath (s.horv...@outlook.com.au) changed: What|Removed |Added Bisected commit-id||9c8647224e9fabb765019193aa4 ||3c054a638f808 --- Comment #2 from Stephen Horvath (s.horv...@outlook.com.au) --- Hi, sorry I had a busy week. Here's the output after bisecting: ``` Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps) [9c8647224e9fabb765019193aa43c054a638f808] ACPI: thermal: Use library functions to obtain trip point temperature values ``` And after some debugging, it seems my device seems to report trip temps of 483.2K (210°C), but the kernel only checks the range 218K (-55°C) to 448K (175°C), which makes it think it's invalid. I'll attach a diff to raise the max to 488K (215°C); although I was wondering if that's enough or if maybe a value like 3276K (3003°C) would be better, since it's just below the signed 16bit limit which seems like it could be used as an invalid value on some devices. Thanks, Steve -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Frank Kruger (fkrue...@mailbox.org) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fkrue...@mailbox.org -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #1 from Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) --- Would be great if you tried to bisect: https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/bug-bisect.html -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Stephen Horvath (s.horv...@outlook.com.au) changed: What|Removed |Added Regression|No |Yes -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Stephen Horvath (s.horv...@outlook.com.au) changed: What|Removed |Added Kernel Version||6.8.0 -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218586] New: No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Bug ID: 218586 Summary: No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8 Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: AMD OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: P3 Component: Power-Thermal Assignee: acpi_power-ther...@kernel-bugs.osdl.org Reporter: s.horv...@outlook.com.au Regression: No Created attachment 305976 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=305976=edit Output of 'dmesg' on Kernel 6.8 Hi, I have a Framework 13 AMD, which had 4 detected thermal zones though ACPI, but starting with kernel 6.8 they no longer appear and the following gets printed in dmesg: ``` [0.630727] ACPI: thermal: [Firmware Bug]: Invalid critical threshold (-274000) [0.630738] ACPI: thermal: [Firmware Bug]: No valid trip points! [0.630819] ACPI: thermal: [Firmware Bug]: Invalid critical threshold (-274000) [0.630828] ACPI: thermal: [Firmware Bug]: No valid trip points! [0.630904] ACPI: thermal: [Firmware Bug]: Invalid critical threshold (-274000) [0.630913] ACPI: thermal: [Firmware Bug]: No valid trip points! [0.630991] ACPI: thermal: [Firmware Bug]: Invalid critical threshold (-274000) [0.631000] ACPI: thermal: [Firmware Bug]: No valid trip points! ``` for comparison this is 6.7.9: ``` [0.632366] ACPI: thermal: Thermal Zone [TZ00] (42 C) [0.632593] ACPI: thermal: Thermal Zone [TZ01] (41 C) [0.632773] ACPI: thermal: Thermal Zone [TZ02] (39 C) [0.632867] ACPI: thermal: Thermal Zone [TZ03] (57 C) ``` Thanks, Steve -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 218557] Kernel regression in acpi/ec.c causing some AMD platforms to limit CPU frequency to < 544Mhz
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218557 --- Comment #12 from Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) --- Framework Phoenix laptops also seem to be affected even when running Windows: https://community.frame.work/t/amd-cpu-stuck-in-low-speed-state-after-system-resume/39921 -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
