RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery

[badhusha]

I seized the domain, still the same
problem any alternative solution , The other dc have becom other fsmo but
not taking over RID role







"Robert Rutherford"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/05/2006 05:18 AM



Please respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org





To



cc



Subject
RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery








Hi,
 
Use NTDSUTIL
 
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/255504/
 
 
Cheers
Rob

Robert Rutherford

QuoStar Solutions Limited

T:    +44 (0)
8456 440 331  

F:    +44 (0) 8456 440 332  

M:    +44 (0) 7974 249 494  

E:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

W:    www.quostar.com  

 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 September 2006 13:03
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery 
 

Guys , another question 

One of My RID master is crashed before transfering of FSMO role to other
DC on the network  , is that any possiblities to make an another domain
as RID master ( backup is failed so i can not restore the failed RID master
DC now) 

Thanks in advance 






"Almeida Pinto, Jorge
de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

09/04/2006 11:18 AM






Please respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org






To




cc
 


Subject
RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master
 




 
 




also see: 
RID Master FSMO explained 
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/25/1040.aspx


cheers,jorge 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 18:11
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master 


Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID
of object created in AD 

Thanks in advance 





"joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

09/04/2006 08:36 AM






Please respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

 





To




cc
 


Subject
RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell
 




 
 





While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and
laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill
bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen
if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the
additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements
of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. 
 
I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come
through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous
relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the
question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all
and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem
helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a
bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON
TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and
asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the
previous discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated
which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want,
the list is just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if
you want and blow by them otherwise. 
 
Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list.
It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :)  There have
been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something
in the monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood
or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps
it all back on topic and of great use. 
 
  joe 
 
 
[1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment
on the quality. :) 
 
[2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize
AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering,
file server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc),
etc. Not saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but
we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD
or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples
being a question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies
for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets
them. Or a general question about DNS like what is returned in a query
or how it is managed versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work
or how its app NC replicates. 
 
-- 
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win

Re: [ActiveDir] Rid Master

[Al Mulnick]

Then I'm sure that replying to this one might give you fits of laughter if Tony doesn't beat me upside the head for it. ;-)On 9/4/06, joe <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:




Personally I think replying to that message to 
state this question was in the realm of ironic... Almost reaching 
tongue in cheek. 
 
:)
 

--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - 
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Al 
MulnickSent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:47 PMTo: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
 Re: [ActiveDir] Rid 
Master

Typically, you don't want to post a new question by replying to an older 
one and just changing the subject.  That leaves the thread information 
still intact. 
 
Role master information: 
http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/9a353810-8e3a-4023-a557-db1a686d8ec81033.mspx?mfr=true 

 
I think as you read this, you'll see how to get the rid information as 
well.  If not, please do respond and let us know. 
 
Al 
On 9/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

  Guys explain me , The functions of RID 
  master , how does i display RID of object created in AD Thanks in advance  

  


  "joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
09/04/2006 08:36 AM 

  
  

  Please respond 
  toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org 
  
  

  
  

  To
<ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org> 
  

  cc

  

  Subject
RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in 
  hell

  
  


  
While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and 
  laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit 
  the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if 
  not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the 
  additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements of the 
  quality of the joke and analysis of words.   I classify the 
  message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list 
  that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being 
  about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing 
  to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give 
  it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of 
  many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to 
  me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at 
  the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked 
  versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless 
  the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the 
  someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read 
  the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise.   Overall I would 
  hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the 
  things that make it worth reading. :)  There have been quite a few times 
  subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying 
  around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we 
  wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic 
  and of great use.      joe 
      [1] Though this was funnier than most OT 
  stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :)   [2] Versus 
  actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are 
  not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server 
  manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying 
  questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a 
  few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD 
  but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how 
  to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the 
  permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general 
  question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed 
  versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC 
  replicates.   -- O'Reilly 
  Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
     
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Craig 
  CerinoSent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: OT - RE: 
  [ActiveDir] W. in hellI have a hell of a sense of humor (as I'm sure a lot of 
  geeks he

Re: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery

[Paul Williams]




Use NTDSUTIL to seize the role(s) - 
kb255504.  Follow the steps in kb216498 to clean AD (metadata and FRS 
objects) and DNS.
 
 
--Paul

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:02 
  PM
  Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery 
  
  Guys , another 
  question One of My RID master 
  is crashed before transfering of FSMO role to other DC on the network  , 
  is that any possiblities to make an another domain as RID master ( backup is 
  failed so i can not restore the failed RID master DC now) Thanks in advance  
  


  "Almeida Pinto, Jorge 
de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
09/04/2006 11:18 AM 

  
  

  Please respond 
  toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
  

  
  

  To
 
  

  cc

  

  Subject
    RE: [ActiveDir] Rid 
  Master

  
  

also see: RID Master 
  FSMO explained http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/25/1040.aspx 
  cheers,jorge 
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 
  18:11To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: 
  [ActiveDir] Rid Master Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how 
  does i display RID of object created in AD 
  Thanks in advance 
  


  "joe" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
09/04/2006 08:36 AM 


  
  

  Please respond 
  toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

  

  
  

  To
 
  
  

  cc

  

  Subject
RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in 
  hell

  
  

While I wouldn't 
  want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the 
  same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny 
  all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen to 
  ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even 
  more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and 
  analysis of words.  I classify the message as OT with the droves of other 
  messages that come through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because 
  of a tenous relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] 
  though the question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing 
  it all and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you 
  seem helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a 
  bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC 
  but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like 
  it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous 
  discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated which no one 
  wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want, the list is 
  just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if you want and blow 
  by them otherwise.  Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and 
  casualness of the list. It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :) 
   There have been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only 
  to expose something in the monkeying around or what not based on something not 
  everyone understood or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that 
  immediately snaps it all back on topic and of great use.    
  joe   [1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value 
  judgment on the quality. :)  [2] Versus actually being AD Technology. 
  Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, 
  Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server manipulations (copying files, 
  home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying questions about all of those 
  are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas 
  that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects 
  of the tech. Examples being a question about how to do something in a GPO 
  versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO 
  objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general question about DNS like what 
  is returned in a query or how it is managed versus what records need to be in 
  DNS for AD to work or how its app NC replicates.  -- 

RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery

[Robert Rutherford]

To seize the role.

 



Rob 

Robert Rutherford 
QuoStar Solutions
Limited 

T:    +44 (0) 8456 440
331   
F:   
+44 (0) 8456 440 332   
M:   
+44 (0) 7974 249 494   
E:   
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
W:   
www.quostar.com   

  











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Rutherford
Sent: 05 September 2006 13:19
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Rid
Master recovery 



 

Hi,

 

Use NTDSUTIL

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/255504/

 

 

Cheers



Rob 

Robert Rutherford 
QuoStar Solutions
Limited 

T:    +44 (0) 8456 440
331   
F:   
+44 (0) 8456 440 332   
M:   
+44 (0) 7974 249 494   
E:   
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
W:   
www.quostar.com   

  











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 September 2006 13:03
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master
recovery 



 


Guys , another question 

One
of My RID master is crashed before transfering of FSMO role to other DC on the
network  , is that any possiblities to make an another domain as RID
master ( backup is failed so i can not restore the failed RID master DC now)


Thanks
in advance 




 
  
  "Almeida Pinto, Jorge de"
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  Sent by:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  09/04/2006
  11:18 AM 
  
   

Please respond
to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

   
  
  
  
  
  
   

To


 

   
   

cc


 

   
   

Subject
    

    RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master

   
  
   
  
   

 


 

   
  
  
  
 





also see: 
RID Master FSMO explained 
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/25/1040.aspx


cheers,jorge 







From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 18:11
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master 


Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of
object created in AD 

Thanks in advance 




 
  
  "joe"
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  09/04/2006
  08:36 AM 
  
   

Please respond
to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

   
  
  
  
  
   
  
   

To


 

   
   

cc


 

   
   

Subject


RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell

   
  
   
  
   

 


 

   
  
  
  
 






While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed
and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy
(which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it
happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional
attention even more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of
the joke and analysis of words. 
 
I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come
through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous
relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the
question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and
just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful.
If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a bit annoying.
More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone
didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like it was the
first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light.
However, unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast
majority of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will
be and you read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. 
 
Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is
one of the things that make it worth reading. :)  There have been quite a
few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the
monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew
that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on
topic and of great use. 
 
  joe 
 
 
[1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on
the quality. :) 
 
[2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD
include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering,
file server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc.
Not saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to
get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the
interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a
question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for
applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and h

RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery

[Almeida Pinto, Jorge de]

in that case you would need to seize 
it
also see:
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/01/05/373.aspx

  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 
  14:03To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: 
  [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery 
  Guys , another question 
  One of My RID master is crashed before 
  transfering of FSMO role to other DC on the network  , is that any 
  possiblities to make an another domain as RID master ( backup is failed so i 
  can not restore the failed RID master DC now) Thanks in advance  
  


  "Almeida Pinto, Jorge 
de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
09/04/2006 11:18 AM 

  
  

  Please respond 
  toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
  

  
  

  To
 
  

  cc

  

  Subject
    RE: [ActiveDir] Rid 
  Master

  
  

also see: RID Master 
  FSMO explained http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/25/1040.aspx 
  cheers,jorge 
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 
  18:11To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: 
  [ActiveDir] Rid Master Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how 
  does i display RID of object created in AD 
  Thanks in advance 
  


  "joe" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
09/04/2006 08:36 AM 


  
  

  Please respond 
  toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

  

  
  

  To
 
  
  

  cc

  

  Subject
RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in 
  hell

  
  

While I wouldn't 
  want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the 
  same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny 
  all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen to 
  ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even 
  more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and 
  analysis of words.  I classify the message as OT with the droves of other 
  messages that come through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because 
  of a tenous relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] 
  though the question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing 
  it all and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you 
  seem helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a 
  bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC 
  but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like 
  it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous 
  discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated which no one 
  wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want, the list is 
  just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if you want and blow 
  by them otherwise.  Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and 
  casualness of the list. It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :) 
   There have been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only 
  to expose something in the monkeying around or what not based on something not 
  everyone understood or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that 
  immediately snaps it all back on topic and of great use.    
  joe   [1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value 
  judgment on the quality. :)  [2] Versus actually being AD Technology. 
  Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, 
  Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server manipulations (copying files, 
  home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying questions about all of those 
  are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas 
  that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects 
  of the tech. Examples being a question about how to do something in a GPO 
  versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO 
  objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general question about DNS like what 
  is returned in a query or how it is managed versus what records need to be in 
  DNS for AD to work or how its app NC replicates.  -- O'Reilly

RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery

[Robert Rutherford]

Hi,

 

Use NTDSUTIL

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/255504/

 

 

Cheers



Rob 

Robert Rutherford 
QuoStar Solutions
Limited 

T:    +44 (0) 8456 440
331   
F:   
+44 (0) 8456 440 332   
M:   
+44 (0) 7974 249 494   
E:   
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
W:   
www.quostar.com   

  











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 September 2006 13:03
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master
recovery 



 


Guys , another question 

One
of My RID master is crashed before transfering of FSMO role to other DC on the
network  , is that any possiblities to make an another domain as RID
master ( backup is failed so i can not restore the failed RID master DC now)


Thanks
in advance 






 
  
  "Almeida Pinto, Jorge
  de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  Sent
  by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  09/04/2006 11:18 AM 
  
   

Please
respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

   
  
  
  
  
  
   

To





   
   

cc


 

   
   

Subject
    

    RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master

   
  
   
  
   

 


 

   
  
  
  
 





also see: 
RID Master FSMO explained 
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/25/1040.aspx


cheers,jorge 







From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 18:11
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master 


Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of
object created in AD 

Thanks in advance 




 
  
  "joe"
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  09/04/2006 08:36 AM 
  
   

Please
respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

   
  
  
  
  
   
  
   

To





   
   

cc


 

   
   

Subject


RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell

   
  
   
  
   

 


 

   
  
  
  
 






While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed
and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy
(which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it
happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional
attention even more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of
the joke and analysis of words. 
 
I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come
through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous
relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the
question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and
just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful.
If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a bit annoying.
More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone
didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like it was the
first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new
light. However, unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a
vast majority of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and
will be and you read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. 
 
Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is
one of the things that make it worth reading. :)  There have been quite a
few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the
monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew
that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on
topic and of great use. 
 
  joe 
 
 
[1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on
the quality. :) 
 
[2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include
but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file
server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not
saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get
quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction
with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question
about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs
or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general
question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed versus
what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC replicates. 
 
-- 
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
 
 







From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Cerino
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AM
To: ActiveDir@m

[ActiveDir] Rid Master recovery

[badhusha]

Guys , another question

One of My RID master is crashed before
transfering of FSMO role to other DC on the network  , is that any
possiblities to make an another domain as RID master ( backup is failed
so i can not restore the failed RID master DC now)

Thanks in advance 







"Almeida Pinto, Jorge
de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/04/2006 11:18 AM



Please respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org





To



cc



Subject
RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master








also see:
RID Master FSMO explained 
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/25/1040.aspx

cheers,jorge

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 18:11
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master 


Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID
of object created in AD 

Thanks in advance 






"joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
09/04/2006 08:36 AM





Please respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org






To




cc



Subject
RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell










While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and
laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill
bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen
if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the
additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements
of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. 
  
I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come
through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous
relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the
question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all
and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem
helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a
bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON
TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and
asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the
previous discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated
which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want,
the list is just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if
you want and blow by them otherwise. 
  
Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list.
It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :)  There have
been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something
in the monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood
or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps
it all back on topic and of great use. 
  
   joe

  
  
[1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment
on the quality. :) 
  
[2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize
AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering,
file server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc),
etc. Not saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but
we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD
or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples
being a question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies
for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets
them. Or a general question about DNS like what is returned in a query
or how it is managed versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work
or how its app NC replicates. 
  
-- 
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm

  
  


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Cerino
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell

I have a hell of a sense of humor (as I’m sure a lot of geeks here do)
this just isn’t the place for it when people come here for help.

  
/just sayin 
  





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Akomolafe, Deji
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 10:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell 
  
Nah.it looks more like the sender mistook this list for some other
lists. On other lists, this would have been a engendered more rapid-fire
flame war to the sender's satisfaction, even though the joke itself is
very old and has outlived its useful shelf life. 
  
I'm sure he's disappointed tha

RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master

[joe]

Personally I think replying to that message to 
state this question was in the realm of ironic... Almost reaching 
tongue in cheek. 
 
:)
 

--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al 
MulnickSent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:47 PMTo: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Rid 
Master

Typically, you don't want to post a new question by replying to an older 
one and just changing the subject.  That leaves the thread information 
still intact. 
 
Role master information: 
http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/9a353810-8e3a-4023-a557-db1a686d8ec81033.mspx?mfr=true 

 
I think as you read this, you'll see how to get the rid information as 
well.  If not, please do respond and let us know. 
 
Al 
On 9/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

  Guys explain me , The functions of RID 
  master , how does i display RID of object created in AD Thanks in advance  
  


  "joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
09/04/2006 08:36 AM 

  
  

  Please respond 
  toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org 
  
  

  
  

  To
<ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org> 
  

  cc

  

  Subject
RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in 
  hell

  
  


  
While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and 
  laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit 
  the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if 
  not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the 
  additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements of the 
  quality of the joke and analysis of words.   I classify the 
  message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list 
  that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being 
  about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing 
  to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give 
  it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of 
  many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to 
  me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at 
  the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked 
  versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless 
  the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the 
  someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read 
  the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise.   Overall I would 
  hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the 
  things that make it worth reading. :)  There have been quite a few times 
  subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying 
  around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we 
  wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic 
  and of great use.      joe 
      [1] Though this was funnier than most OT 
  stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :)   [2] Versus 
  actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are 
  not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server 
  manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying 
  questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a 
  few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD 
  but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how 
  to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the 
  permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general 
  question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed 
  versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC 
  replicates.   -- O'Reilly 
  Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm     
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Craig 
  CerinoSent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: OT - RE: 
  [ActiveDir] W. in hellI have a hell of a sense of humor (as I'm sure a lot of 
  geeks here do) this just isn't the place for it when people come here for 
  help.   /just sayin   
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of 
  Akomolafe, DejiSent

RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master

[Almeida Pinto, Jorge de]

also see:
RID Master 
FSMO explained 
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/archive/2006/05/25/1040.aspx
cheers,jorge

  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 
  18:11To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: 
  [ActiveDir] Rid Master 
  Guys explain me , The functions of 
  RID master , how does i display RID of object created in AD 
  Thanks in advance  
  
  


  "joe" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
09/04/2006 08:36 AM 

  
  

  Please respond 
  toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
  

  
  

  To
 
  

  cc

  

  Subject
RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in 
  hell

  
  

While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw 
  the email and laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook 
  autofill bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it 
  happen if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of 
  the additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements of 
  the quality of the joke and analysis of words.   I classify the 
  message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list 
  that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being 
  about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing 
  to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give 
  it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of 
  many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to 
  me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at 
  the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked 
  versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless 
  the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the 
  someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read 
  the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise.   Overall I would 
  hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the 
  things that make it worth reading. :)  There have been quite a few times 
  subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying 
  around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we 
  wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic 
  and of great use.      joe 
      [1] Though this was funnier than most OT 
  stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :)   [2] Versus 
  actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are 
  not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server 
  manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying 
  questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a 
  few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD 
  but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how 
  to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the 
  permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general 
  question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed 
  versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC 
  replicates.   -- O'Reilly 
  Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm     
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig 
  CerinoSent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AMTo: 
  ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in 
  hellI 
  have a hell of a sense of humor (as I’m sure a lot of geeks here do) this just 
  isn’t the place for it when people come here for help.   /just sayin   
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Akomolafe, DejiSent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 
  10:58 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: OT 
  - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell   Nah.it looks more like 
  the sender mistook this list for some other lists. On other lists, this would 
  have been a engendered more rapid-fire flame war to the sender's satisfaction, 
  even though the joke itself is very old and has outlived its useful shelf 
  life.   I'm sure he's disappointed that this list 

RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master

[badhusha]

Really a good stuff , Thanks for everyone








"Brian Desmond"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/04/2006 09:25 AM



Please respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org





To



cc



Subject
RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master








So, every security
principal in AD has a SID, or a Security Identifier. This uniquely identifies
the object within the scope of the domain. There are a few pieces of a
SID for a security principal in the domain – among them are the domain
SID and the RID. The domain SID identifies the domain which in SID speak
is the issuing authority for that SID – if a computer needs to resolve
that SID back to a principal this will lead it back to the domain. RID
stands for Relative Identifier. This is the unique ID for the object in
the domain. To guarantee uniqueness, one DC in the domain functions as
a RID Master. The RID Master issues blocks of 500 RIDs to DCs on an as
needed basis. Anytime you create an object on a DC, it allocates a RID
to the object and that becomes a component of the SID.
 
Here’s a link on
this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url="">
 
 
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
c - 312.731.3132
 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:11 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master 
 

Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID
of object created in AD 

Thanks in advance 






"joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

09/04/2006 08:36 AM






Please respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org






To
<ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>



cc



Subject
RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell
 










While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and
laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill
bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen
if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the
additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements
of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. 
  
I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come
through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous
relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the
question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all
and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem
helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a
bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON
TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and
asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the
previous discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated
which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want,
the list is just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if
you want and blow by them otherwise. 
  
Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list.
It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :)  There have
been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something
in the monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood
or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps
it all back on topic and of great use. 
  
   joe

  
  
[1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment
on the quality. :) 
  
[2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize
AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering,
file server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc),
etc. Not saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but
we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD
or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples
being a question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies
for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets
them. Or a general question about DNS like what is returned in a query
or how it is managed versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work
or how its app NC replicates. 
  
-- 
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm

  
  



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Cerino
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell

I have a hell of a sense of humor (as I’m sure a lot of ge

Re: [ActiveDir] Rid Master

[steve patrick]




For more info see: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=305475
 
stuff like:
 


  
  

RidNextRid 
  DN Path: CN=Rid Set,Cn=computername,ou=domain 
  controllers,DC=domain,DC=COM The RID that is assigned to 
  next security principal that is created on the local domain controller. 
  RidNextRid is a non-replicated value in Active Directory.
  


  •
  Sample Value: 159345 (RID assigned to next security 
principal from 
  RidPreviousAllocationPool)
 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Brian 
  Desmond 
  To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org 
  
  Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 9:25 
  AM
  Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master 

  
  
  So, 
  every security principal in AD has a SID, or a Security Identifier. This 
  uniquely identifies the object within the scope of the domain. There are a few 
  pieces of a SID for a security principal in the domain – among them are the 
  domain SID and the RID. The domain SID identifies the domain which in SID 
  speak is the issuing authority for that SID – if a computer needs to resolve 
  that SID back to a principal this will lead it back to the domain. RID stands 
  for Relative Identifier. This is the unique ID for the object in the domain. 
  To guarantee uniqueness, one DC in the domain functions as a RID Master. The 
  RID Master issues blocks of 500 RIDs to DCs on an as needed basis. Anytime you 
  create an object on a DC, it allocates a RID to the object and that becomes a 
  component of the SID.
   
  Here’s 
  a link on this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url="">
   
   
  Thanks,
  Brian 
  Desmond
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  c 
  - 312.731.3132
   
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 
  12:11 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: 
  [ActiveDir] Rid Master 
   
  Guys explain me , 
  The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of object created in 
  AD Thanks in advance 
  
  


  
"joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

09/04/2006 
08:36 AM 

  
  

  Please 
  respond toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
  

  
  

  To

  <ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org> 
  
  

  cc

  

  Subject

  RE: OT 
  - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in 
hell
 

  
  


  While 
  I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and 
  figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which 
  is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen 
  to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even 
  more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and 
  analysis of words.   I 
  classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through 
  the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship 
  of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has 
  nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, 
  I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a 
  whole day of many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, 
  at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time 
  to look at the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was 
  asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, 
  unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority 
  of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and 
  you read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. 
    Overall 
  I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of 
  the things that make it worth reading. :)  There have been quite a few 
  times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the 
  monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood or 
  knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all 
  back on topic and of great use.     
   joe     [1] 
  Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on the 
  quality. :)   [2] 
  Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include 
  but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file 
  server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not 
  saying questions about all

Re: [ActiveDir] Rid Master

[Al Mulnick]

Typically, you don't want to post a new question by replying to an older one and just changing the subject.  That leaves the thread information still intact. 
 
Role master information: 
http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/9a353810-8e3a-4023-a557-db1a686d8ec81033.mspx?mfr=true

 
I think as you read this, you'll see how to get the rid information as well.  If not, please do respond and let us know. 
 
Al 
On 9/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of object created in AD Thanks in advance 
 



"joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
09/04/2006 08:36 AM 




Please respond toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org






To
 


cc



Subject
RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell





While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. 
  I classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. 
  Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :)  There have been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic and of great use. 
     joe     [1] Though this was funnier than most OT 
stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :)   [2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC replicates. 
  -- O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - 
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm     

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Craig CerinoSent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AMTo: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hellI have a hell of a sense of humor (as I'm sure a lot of geeks here do) this just isn't the place for it when people come here for help.
   /just sayin   


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Akomolafe, DejiSent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 10:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell
   Nah.it looks more like the sender mistook this list for some other lists. On other lists, this would have been a engendered more rapid-fire flame war to the sender's satisfaction, even though the joke itself is very old and has outlived its useful shelf life.
   I'm sure he's disappointed that this list is so geeky and full of maroons with no sense of humors. 
  Sincerely,   _                                 (, /  |  /)               /)     /)      /---| (/_  __   ___// _   //  _ 
) /    |_/(__(_) // (_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_(_/                             /)                                    (/       Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.akomolafe.com - we know IT-5.75, -3.23Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
   


From: Laura A. RobinsonSent: Sun 9/3/2006 5:41 PMTo: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: OT - RE: [Ac

RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master

[neil.ruston]

Use adisedit to view the object's SID. Remove the domain 
part of the SID to reveal the RID.


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert 
RutherfordSent: 04 September 2006 17:21To: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master 



…… as the tumbleweed 
blows on through the group, Rob peers over to Joe, tilts his hat, and gives a 
knowing nod ;)
 

Rob 
Robert 
Rutherford 
QuoStar 
Solutions Limited 

T:    
+44 (0) 8456 440 331   F:    
+44 (0) 8456 440 332   M:    
+44 (0) 7974 249 494   E: 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: 
   www.quostar.com   
  




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: 04 September 2006 17:11To: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master 

 
Guys explain me , 
The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of object created in 
AD Thanks in advance 


  
  

  "joe" 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  Sent by: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  09/04/2006 08:36 
  AM 
  


  
Please respond 
toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
  

  


  
To
  
 


  
cc
  
 

  
Subject
  
RE: OT - RE: 
[ActiveDir] W. in 
  hell
   
  


  
 
  
 
  
While I wouldn't want 
this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the same 
thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny all by 
itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen to ourselves) and 
then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even more humourous 
including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. 
  I classify the message 
as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list that are 
OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being about 
technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing to do 
with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot 
and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of many of 
those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are 
questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at the archives 
or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked versus maybe 
revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless the list goes 
moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the someone's don't 
want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read the messages if 
you want and blow by them otherwise.   Overall I would hate to 
lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the things that 
make it worth reading. :)  There have been quite a few times subjects have 
drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying around or what not 
based on something not everyone understood or knew that we wouldn't have 
otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic and of great 
use.     
 joe     [1] Though 
this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. 
:)   [2] Versus actually 
being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are not 
limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server 
manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying 
questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a 
few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD but 
about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how to do 
something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the permissions 
on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general question about DNS 
like what is returned in a query or how it is managed versus what records need 
to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC replicates. 
  -- 
O'Reilly Active 
Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
    



From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Craig CerinoSent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 
AMTo: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in 
hellI have a hell of a 
sense of humor (as I’m sure a lot of geeks here do) this just isn’t the place 
for it when people come here for help.   
/just 
sayin   

 



From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Akomolafe, 
DejiSent: Sunday, September 
03, 2006 10:58 PMTo: 
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in 
hell   Nah.it looks more like the 
sender mistook this list for some other lists. On other lists, this w

Re: [ActiveDir] Rid Master

[Paul Williams]




Google RID FSMO for the functions of the 
RID master.  Many people, including myself [1], have documented this.  
This info. is easily findable on the big wild web.
 
As for how to view the RID of a user 
object, there are several ways.  An easy was is to download ADFIND (www.joeware.net) and type the 
following:
 
    adfind -default -f 
samaccountname=username -nodn objectsid
 
e.g.
 
    adfind -default -f 
samaccountname=paulw -nodn objectsid
 
 
The value that is returned is the 
SID.  The RID is the last section (usually four, five or six digits 
long).
 
 
--Paul
 
[1] http://www.msresource.net/content/view/13/46/

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org 
  
  Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 5:11 
  PM
  Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master 
  Guys explain me , The 
  functions of RID master , how does i display RID of object created in 
  AD Thanks in advance 
   
  


  "joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

09/04/2006 08:36 AM 

  
  

  Please respond 
  toActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
  

  
  

  To
<ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org> 

  

  cc

  

  Subject
RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in 
  hell

  
  

While I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw 
  the email and laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook 
  autofill bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have all seen it 
  happen if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of 
  the additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements of 
  the quality of the joke and analysis of words.   I classify the 
  message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through the list 
  that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being 
  about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing 
  to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give 
  it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of 
  many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to 
  me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look at 
  the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was asked 
  versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However, unless 
  the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority of the 
  someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you read 
  the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise.   Overall I would 
  hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the 
  things that make it worth reading. :)  There have been quite a few times 
  subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying 
  around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we 
  wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic 
  and of great use.      joe 
      [1] Though this was funnier than most OT 
  stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :)   [2] Versus 
  actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are 
  not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server 
  manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying 
  questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a 
  few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD 
  but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how 
  to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the 
  permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general 
  question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed 
  versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC 
  replicates.   -- O'Reilly 
  Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm     
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig 
  CerinoSent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AMTo: 
  ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in 
  hellI 
  have a hell of a sense of humor (as I’m sure a lot of geeks here do) this just 
  isn’t the place for it when people come here for help.   /just sayin   
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Akomolafe, DejiSent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 
  10:58 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: OT 
  - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell   Nah.it 

RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master

[Brian Desmond]

So, every security principal in AD has a SID, or a Security
Identifier. This uniquely identifies the object within the scope of the domain.
There are a few pieces of a SID for a security principal in the domain – among them
are the domain SID and the RID. The domain SID identifies the domain which in
SID speak is the issuing authority for that SID – if a computer needs to
resolve that SID back to a principal this will lead it back to the domain. RID
stands for Relative Identifier. This is the unique ID for the object in the
domain. To guarantee uniqueness, one DC in the domain functions as a RID
Master. The RID Master issues blocks of 500 RIDs to DCs on an as needed basis.
Anytime you create an object on a DC, it allocates a RID to the object and that
becomes a component of the SID.

 

Here’s a link on this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url="">

 

 

Thanks,

Brian Desmond

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

c - 312.731.3132

 







From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 12:11 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master 





 


Guys explain me
, The functions of RID master , how does i display RID of object created in AD


Thanks in
advance 






 
  
  "joe"
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  09/04/2006
  08:36 AM 
  
   

Please respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

   
  
  
  
  
   

To


<ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>


   
   

cc


   
   

Subject


RE:
OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell

   
  
   
  
   


   
  
  
 





While
I wouldn't want this to become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and
figured the same thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which
is funny all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen
to ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention even
more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the joke and
analysis of words. 
  
I
classify the message as OT with the droves of other messages that come through
the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of
being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has
nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll
give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole
day of many of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at
least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to
look at the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was
asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However,
unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority
of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be and you
read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. 
  
Overall
I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of
the things that make it worth reading. :)  There have been quite a few
times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying
around or what not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we
wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic
and of great use. 
  
   joe 
  
  
[1]
Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on the
quality. :) 
  
[2]
Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech that utilize AD include
but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print queues, clustering, file
server manipulations (copying files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not
saying questions about all of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get
quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction
with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question
about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs
or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general
question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed versus
what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC replicates. 
  
--

O'Reilly
Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
  
  







From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Craig Cerino
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell

I
have a hell of a sense of humor (as I’m sure a lot of geeks here do) this just

RE: [ActiveDir] Rid Master

[Robert Rutherford]

…… as the tumbleweed blows on through the
group, Rob peers over to Joe, tilts his hat, and gives a knowing nod ;)

 



Rob 

Robert Rutherford 
QuoStar Solutions
Limited 

T:    +44 (0) 8456 440
331   
F:   
+44 (0) 8456 440 332   
M:   
+44 (0) 7974 249 494   
E:   
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
W:   
www.quostar.com   

  











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 September 2006 17:11
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Rid Master 



 


Guys explain me , The functions of RID master , how
does i display RID of object created in AD 

Thanks
in advance 






 
  
  "joe"
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  Sent
  by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  09/04/2006 08:36 AM 
  
   

Please
respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org

   
  
  
  
  
  
   

To





   
   

cc


 

   
   

Subject


RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell

   
  
   
  
   

 


 

   
  
  
  
 





While I wouldn't want this to become a humour
list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the same thing Laura figured,
that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny all by itself because we have
all seen it happen if not had it happen to ourselves) and then I moved on. I
find all of the additional attention even more humourous including the value judgements
of the quality of the joke and analysis of words. 
  
I classify the message as OT with the droves of other
messages that come through the list that are OT[1] and being sent here because
of a tenous relationship of being about technologies that utlitize AD[2] though
the question itself has nothing to do with AD or simply folks forgoing it all
and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot and ask you guys because you seem
helpful. If you get a whole day of many of those coming through it is a bit
annoying. More annoying, at least to me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but
someone didn't take time to look at the archives or google and asking like it
was the first time it was asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion
in new light. However, unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at
least a vast majority of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it
is and will be and you read the messages if you want and blow by them
otherwise. 
  
Overall I would hate to lose the jocularity and casualness of
the list. It is one of the things that make it worth reading. :)  There
have been quite a few times subjects have drifted off topic only to expose
something in the monkeying around or what not based on something not everyone
understood or knew that we wouldn't have otherwise found out that immediately
snaps it all back on topic and of great use. 
  
   joe 
  
  
[1] Though this was funnier than most OT stuff.There is my
value judgment on the quality. :) 
  
[2] Versus actually being AD Technology. Examples of tech
that utilize AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS, Exchange, print
queues, clustering, file server manipulations (copying files, home drives,
management, etc), etc. Not saying questions about all of those are automatically
OT, but we tend to get quite a few questions in those areas that aren't about
AD or the interaction with AD but about the non-AD aspects of the tech.
Examples being a question about how to do something in a GPO versus say OU
strategies for applying GPOs or the permissions on the GPO objects and how AD
interprets them. Or a general question about DNS like what is returned in a
query or how it is managed versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work
or how its app NC replicates. 
  
-- 
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
  
  







From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Cerino
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell

I have a hell of a sense of humor (as I’m sure a lot of geeks
here do) this just isn’t the place for it when people come here for help.

  
/just sayin 
  

 








From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akomolafe, Deji
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 10:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell 
  
Nah.it
looks more like the sender mistook this list for some other lists. On other
lists, this would have been a engendered more rapid-fire flame war to the
sender's satisfaction, even though the joke itself is very old and has outlived
its useful shelf life. 
  
I'm
sure he's disappointed that this list 

[ActiveDir] Rid Master

[badhusha]

Guys explain me , The functions of RID
master , how does i display RID of object created in AD

Thanks in advance 







"joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/04/2006 08:36 AM



Please respond to
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org





To



cc



Subject
RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell








While I wouldn't want this to
become a humour list, I saw the email and laughed and figured the same
thing Laura figured, that Outlook autofill bit the guy (which is funny
all by itself because we have all seen it happen if not had it happen to
ourselves) and then I moved on. I find all of the additional attention
even more humourous including the value judgements of the quality of the
joke and analysis of words. 
 
I classify the message as OT with
the droves of other messages that come through the list that are OT[1]
and being sent here because of a tenous relationship of being about technologies
that utlitize AD[2] though the question itself has nothing to do with AD
or simply folks forgoing it all and just saying WTF, I'll give it a shot
and ask you guys because you seem helpful. If you get a whole day of many
of those coming through it is a bit annoying. More annoying, at least to
me, are questions that are ON TOPIC but someone didn't take time to look
at the archives or google and asking like it was the first time it was
asked versus maybe revisitng the previous discussion in new light. However,
unless the list goes moderated which no one wants or at least a vast majority
of the someone's don't want, the list is just the way it is and will be
and you read the messages if you want and blow by them otherwise. 
 
Overall I would hate to lose the
jocularity and casualness of the list. It is one of the things that make
it worth reading. :)  There have been quite a few times subjects have
drifted off topic only to expose something in the monkeying around or what
not based on something not everyone understood or knew that we wouldn't
have otherwise found out that immediately snaps it all back on topic and
of great use. 
 
   joe
 
 
[1] Though this was funnier than
most OT stuff.There is my value judgment on the quality. :)
 
[2] Versus actually being AD Technology.
Examples of tech that utilize AD include but are not limited to GPOs, DNS,
Exchange, print queues, clustering, file server manipulations (copying
files, home drives, management, etc), etc. Not saying questions about all
of those are automatically OT, but we tend to get quite a few questions
in those areas that aren't about AD or the interaction with AD but about
the non-AD aspects of the tech. Examples being a question about how to
do something in a GPO versus say OU strategies for applying GPOs or the
permissions on the GPO objects and how AD interprets them. Or a general
question about DNS like what is returned in a query or how it is managed
versus what records need to be in DNS for AD to work or how its app NC
replicates. 
 
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third
Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm

 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Cerino
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 10:46 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell

I have a hell of a sense of
humor (as I’m sure a lot of geeks here do) this just isn’t the place
for it when people come here for help.
 
/just sayin
 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akomolafe,
Deji
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 10:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell
 
Nah.it looks more like the sender mistook
this list for some other lists. On other lists, this would have been a
engendered more rapid-fire flame war to the sender's satisfaction, even
though the joke itself is very old and has outlived its useful shelf life.
 
I'm sure he's disappointed that this list
is so geeky and full of maroons with no sense of humors.
 

Sincerely, 
   _                  
             
  (, /  |  /)            
  /)     /)   
    /---| (/_  __   ___// _   //  _ 
 ) /    |_/(__(_) // (_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_
(_/                    
        /)      
                    
          (/       
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.akomolafe.com
- we know IT
-5.75, -3.23
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday?
-anon
 



From: Laura A. Robinson
Sent: Sun 9/3/2006 5:41 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: OT - RE: [ActiveDir] W. in hell
Okay, has anybody considered the possibility
that this was an accident? I
know I've accidentally sent mail to
the wrong addresses before by letting
autofill kick in an not paying attention
to what actually got autofilled,
and this seems like a very strange
thing to send to this list intentionally.
 
Laura 
 
> 

RE: [ActiveDir] RID master problem or...?

[Esteban Sonofthesun]

Hello,
 
I solved the problem by adding another DC on the network. And replicate with the master...
 
Thanks...
EstebanRobert Rutherford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:









Dcdiag even :O)
 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert RutherfordSent: 23 August 2004 12:09To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RID master problem or...?
 
Let’s take this a step at a time…
 
1) Save off the event logs, clear them and then bounce the box… lets start from a clean base if possible. Re-run the dcpromo.
 
BR
 
Rob
 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Esteban SonofthesunSent: 23 August 2004 11:52To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RID master problem or...?
 




Hi Robert,

 

I'm openning ADUC from server. 

 

1) I checked RID Master is available. (it is the RID master, there is no other DC on this domain)

2) i attached the dcdiag file.

 

Thanks for your interest.
__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ===Scanned for virus infection by Messagelabs===
===Email security provided by Modrus using MessageLabs Email Securitywww.modrus.com==Scanned for virus infection by Messagelabs===
		Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!

RE: [ActiveDir] RID master problem or...?

[Robert Rutherford]

Dcdiag even :O)

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Rutherford
Sent: 23 August 2004 12:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RID
master problem or...?



 

Let’s take this a step at a
time…

 

1) Save off the event logs, clear them and then bounce the box…
lets start from a clean base if possible. Re-run the dcpromo.

 

BR

 

Rob

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Esteban Sonofthesun
Sent: 23 August 2004 11:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RID
master problem or...?



 









Hi Robert,





 





I'm openning ADUC from server. 





 





1) I checked RID Master is available. (it is the RID master, there is
no other DC on this domain)





2) i attached the dcdiag file.





 





Thanks for your interest.









__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
===
Scanned for virus infection by Messagelabs
===


===
Email security provided by Modrus using MessageLabs Email Security
www.modrus.com
===

===
Scanned for virus infection by Messagelabs
===

RE: [ActiveDir] RID master problem or...?

[Robert Rutherford]

Let’s take this a step at a time…

 

1) Save off the event logs, clear them and then bounce the box…
lets start from a clean base if possible. Re-run the dcpromo.

 

BR

 

Rob

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Esteban Sonofthesun
Sent: 23 August 2004 11:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RID
master problem or...?



 









Hi Robert,





 





I'm openning ADUC from server. 





 





1) I checked RID Master is available. (it is the RID master, there is
no other DC on this domain)





2) i attached the dcdiag file.





 





Thanks for your interest.









__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
===
Scanned for virus infection by Messagelabs
===

RE: [ActiveDir] RID master problem or...?

[Esteban Sonofthesun]

Hi Robert,
 
I'm openning ADUC from server. 
 
1) I checked RID Master is available. (it is the RID master, there is no other DC on this domain)
2) i attached the dcdiag file.
 
Thanks for your interest.__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 
DC Diagnosis

Performing initial setup:
   * Verifing that the local machine ntserver, is a DC. 
   * Connecting to directory service on server ntserver.
   * Collecting site info.
   * Identifying all servers.
   * Found 4 DC(s). Testing 1 of them.
   Done gathering initial info.

Doing initial non skippeable tests
   
   Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\NTSERVER
  Starting test: Connectivity
 * Active Directory LDAP Services Check
 * Active Directory RPC Services Check
 . NTSERVER passed test Connectivity

Doing primary tests
   
   Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\NTSERVER
  Starting test: Replications
 * Replications Check
 [Replications Check,NTSERVER] A recent replication attempt failed:
From EX_pak2 to NTSERVER
Naming Context: CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=pak,DC=info
The replication generated an error (8524):
Win32 Error 8524
The failure occurred at 2004-08-20 14:54.47.
The last success occurred at 2003-09-18 18:12.59.
8051 failures have occurred since the last success.
The guid-based DNS name 
d13d4211-36e1-4f95-903c-a1cc5912c367._msdcs.pak.info
is not registered on one or more DNS servers.
 [EX_pak2] DsBind() failed with error 1722,
 Win32 Error 1722.
 [Replications Check,NTSERVER] A recent replication attempt failed:
From EX2pak to NTSERVER
Naming Context: CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=pak,DC=info
The replication generated an error (8524):
Win32 Error 8524
The failure occurred at 2004-08-20 14:54.50.
The last success occurred at 2003-10-16 11:48.47.
7379 failures have occurred since the last success.
The guid-based DNS name 
a84dad48-3f52-49e9-a2bc-051e28fa43a8._msdcs.pak.info
is not registered on one or more DNS servers.
 [EX2pak] DsBind() failed with error 1722,
 Win32 Error 1722.
 [Replications Check,NTSERVER] A recent replication attempt failed:
From EX_pak2 to NTSERVER
Naming Context: CN=Configuration,DC=pak,DC=info
The replication generated an error (8524):
Win32 Error 8524
The failure occurred at 2004-08-20 14:54.41.
The last success occurred at 2003-09-18 18:20.05.
8051 failures have occurred since the last success.
The guid-based DNS name 
d13d4211-36e1-4f95-903c-a1cc5912c367._msdcs.pak.info
is not registered on one or more DNS servers.
 [Replications Check,NTSERVER] A recent replication attempt failed:
From EX2pak to NTSERVER
Naming Context: CN=Configuration,DC=pak,DC=info
The replication generated an error (8524):
Win32 Error 8524
The failure occurred at 2004-08-20 14:54.44.
The last success occurred at 2003-10-16 12:05.19.
7379 failures have occurred since the last success.
The guid-based DNS name 
a84dad48-3f52-49e9-a2bc-051e28fa43a8._msdcs.pak.info
is not registered on one or more DNS servers.
 [Replications Check,NTSERVER] A recent replication attempt failed:
From EX_pak2 to NTSERVER
Naming Context: DC=pak,DC=info
The replication generated an error (8524):
Win32 Error 8524
The failure occurred at 2004-08-20 14:54.35.
The last success occurred at 2003-09-18 18:15.02.
8052 failures have occurred since the last success.
The guid-based DNS name 
d13d4211-36e1-4f95-903c-a1cc5912c367._msdcs.pak.info
is not registered on one or more DNS servers.
 [Replications Check,NTSERVER] A recent replication attempt failed:
From EX2pak to NTSERVER
Naming Context: DC=pak,DC=info
The replication generated an error (8524):
Win32 Error 8524
The failure occurred at 2004-08-20 14:54.38.
The last success occurred at 2003-10-16 12:04.33.
7379 failures have occurred since the last success.
The guid-based DNS name 
a84dad48-3f52-49e9-a2bc-051e28fa43a8._msdcs.pak.info
is not registered on one or more DNS servers.
 . NTSERVER passed test Replications
  Test omitted by user request: Topology
  Test omitted by user request: CutoffServers
  Starting test: NCSecDesc
 * Security Permissions Check for
   CN=Schema,CN=

RE: [ActiveDir] RID master problem or...?

[Robert Rutherford]

Where are you opening ADUC (AD Manager)
from… the server or your desktop? I’m assuming you got in
eventually by your second statement.

 

1) Open your ADUC console and right click on the domain name and
select the operation masters menu item. The first tab should be the RID master.
Is the server shown as the RID master available on your network?

2) If it is available then run dcdiag on the box. This can be found
under the support folder on your server disk. When you have run it then paste
the results back here so we can have al look.

 

This is a starting point and will give
something to work on.

 

Rob.

 

 

 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Esteban Sonofthesun
Sent: 23 August 2004 09:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] RID master
problem or...?



 



Hi all,





 





I have a problem on my AD.





 





At my first try to open AD manager it gives :





 





"Naming information cannot be located because:
The specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted."





 





And then when i try to add an user to my database it gives :





 





"Windows cannot create the object because:
The directory service has exhausted the pool of relative identifiers.





..."





 





From microsoft and google, i found WTIME problem and try to solve by
this way but this solution didnot solve my problem. An then try the
resolution below :





 





 839879 Event ID 16650:
The account-identifier allocator failed to initialize in:






http://support.microsoft.com/?id=839879





 





But still the problem continues.





 





What is your opinion?





 





Thanks for yours answers in advance.





Esteban



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
===
Scanned for virus infection by Messagelabs
===

[ActiveDir] RID master problem or...?

[Esteban Sonofthesun]

Hi all,
 
I have a problem on my AD.
 
At my first try to open AD manager it gives :
 
"Naming information cannot be located because:The specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted."
 
And then when i try to add an user to my database it gives :
 
"Windows cannot create the object because:The directory service has exhausted the pool of relative identifiers.
..."
 
From microsoft and google, i found WTIME problem and try to solve by this way but this solution didnot solve my problem. An then try the resolution below :
 
 839879 Event ID 16650: The account-identifier allocator failed to initialize in:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=839879
 
But still the problem continues.
 
What is your opinion?
 
Thanks for yours answers in advance.
Esteban__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 

AW: [ActiveDir] RID master / ADMT 2.0

[Thomas]

If you use SP4 your DCs will request a new rid pool as soon as
50% of the old pool is consumed. Have a look here:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3ben-us%3b316201
You can also adjust the number of rids a DC requests by changing
the "RID Block Size" value in the registry (see same document).


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Graham Turner
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2003 19:12
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [ActiveDir] RID master / ADMT 2.0 


just wanted to get any issues that have come to light during an ADMT
process
specfically relating to the function of the RID master

 when doing a mid size migration (approx 4000 objects) it seems the
allocation of RIDs' may become an issue.

the operation of rid master is understood to be allocation of a new pool
after a percentage of the current pool is exhausted -

in an ADMT 2.0 migration of approx (4000 users) this would be quickly
exhausted perhaps leaving potential for failure of the ADMT 2.0 if it
can
get another RID in good time from a newly allocated pool.

this does beg another question - is there any known issue of delay in
the
allocation of new rid pool ??

GT


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

[ActiveDir] RID master / ADMT 2.0

[Graham Turner]

just wanted to get any issues that have come to light during an ADMT process
specfically relating to the function of the RID master

 when doing a mid size migration (approx 4000 objects) it seems the
allocation of RIDs' may become an issue.

the operation of rid master is understood to be allocation of a new pool
after a percentage of the current pool is exhausted -

in an ADMT 2.0 migration of approx (4000 users) this would be quickly
exhausted perhaps leaving potential for failure of the ADMT 2.0 if it can
get another RID in good time from a newly allocated pool.

this does beg another question - is there any known issue of delay in the
allocation of new rid pool ??

GT


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/