Re: [address-policy-wg] agreement

2016-05-10 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 10 May 2016, at 14:27, Michael Oghia wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have been following the discussion and I strongly support Jan's
> suggestion, especially since the bulk of the contention seems to be with
> what Jan describes as Part B. Does anyone know if it is possible to split
> the proposal into two parts?

  Yes.

  If it were my proposal, here's how I would go about it.

  Withdraw the current proposal.
  The proposer can always do this during the process.

  Introduce two new proposals (2016-somenumber and 2016-someothernumber)
  respectively containing the "Part A" and "Part B" material from the
  current proposal.

  There may be other ways of doing it, but this seems simple and effective.

  Best regards,

  Niall O'Reilly



Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

2016-04-14 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 14 Apr 2016, at 17:01, Jim Reid wrote:

> I strongly disagree with the proposal

  what Jim said, which you don't need to see again.
  Well said, Jim.

  /Niall