NetWare 6.5 Cluster with memory leak
Hi All ;o) I've got an consitent problem with TSM and NetWare 6.5 Cluster enviroments! At several customers sites, I've noticed that they are forced to restart the clusternode's within 14 - 30 days (depending on the amount of RAM) - The funny thing is, that it don't seem to be the backup modules there are having this defect due to the fact that a similarly machine without cluster just keeps on running... So what are we talking about... - NetWare 6.5 Cluster - SP1 - TSM Client 5.2.2.3 - TSA5UP13 14 Any ideas Best regards Flemming ___ www.kmd.dk www.kundenet.kmd.dk www.eboks.dk www.civitas.dk www.netborger.dk Hvis du har modtaget denne mail ved en fejl vil jeg gerne, at du informerer mig og sletter den. KMD skaber it-services, der fremmer effektivitet hos det offentlige, erhvervslivet og borgerne. If you received this e-mail by mistake, please notify me and delete it. Thank you. Our mission is to enhance the efficiency of the public sector and improve its service of the general public.
Re: TSM 5.2.3.1 SMUTIL Problem
Hello, we had to update to 5.2.x.x because we needed the 3592 support. The 5.1.8.0 we had before was the most stable version we had. I opend a PMR but IBM haven`t answered yet. We also have another two problems. ---1st Problem--- On some clients (AIX, Win, ...) we have following messages in the actlog: 2004-08-11 12:06:07 ANR0423W Session 7633 for administrator Pé ( ) refused - administrator name not registered. (SESSION: 7633) I didn`t open a PMR yet. On two clients we generate the client password new. Since this time we didn`t see the problem on this clients again. But generate new passwords for about 400 clients is a lot of work ---1st Problem--- The another problem is a TDP problem with oracle. Best Regards Stefan Weichler -Original Message- Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von MC Matt Cooper (2838) Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 13:24 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: TSM 5.2.3.1 SMUTIL Problem I am in the processes of upgrading to that release on z/OS 1.4. What has IBM said about this? I would report it as a problem ASAP. I am on 5.1.8.1. What release were you at that didn't have it? I have to get on 5.2 to handle the Win2003 SYSTEM STATE backups. My options may be limited, but I don't think I want to jump into the frying pan you are in. Matt -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Weichler, Stefan Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 8:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM 5.2.3.1 SMUTIL Problem Hello, last week we updated our 6 TSM-Sever at the mainframe (z/OS 1.4) to 5.2.3.1. Today we found following errors in our actlog: 2004-08-09 22:30 ANRD SMUTIL(12815): ThreadId10591 Session 5837 attempted to associate itself with the wrong node Callchain follows: pkShowCallChain+2E2 - outDiagf+27E - SmAddSessionToAffinityCluster+27C - SmNodeSession+1D6 - SmSchedSession+114 - HandleNodeSession+21F8 - DoNodeSched+76 - smExecuteSession+3330 - Bpx1Session+222 - pkThreadHead+4FA (SESSION: 5837) 2004-08-09 22:30 ANRD SMUTIL(12817): ThreadId10591 Statistics for Session 5837 will not be kept Callchain follows: pkShowCallChain+2E2 - outDiagf+27E - SmAddSessionToAffinityCluster+2AE - SmNodeSession+1D6 - SmSchedSession+114 - HandleNodeSession+21F8 - DoNodeSched+76 - smExecuteSession+3330 - Bpx1Session+222 - pkThreadHead+4FA (SESSION: 5837) Any ideas? Is this a well-knwon problem? Should i open a pmr at ibm? Regards Stefan Weichler
Relationship between primary and copy pool
Hi, Does anyone know how to get the relationship between primary and copy pool. Before my COPY_POOL reclamation I want to know which primary volumes I'll need to check in into the library. TIA Fernando Figueiredo EDS SAP Systems Administrator
How long did each client take to backup?
Is there a query or SQL query I could run to get me that can tell me, on a per client basis, how long the backup took from the servers perspective for each backup that ran in the last 24 hours? TIA ... JC
Re: Relationship between primary and copy pool
That's one of the shining moments of TSM. You don't need to check in copy pool tapes in order to reclaim them. Just set your reclamation level for the pool, and TSM will reclaim them by using the copies of files existing in the primary tape pool. -- Mark Stapleton -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fernando Figueiredo (EDS) Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 4:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Relationship between primary and copy pool Hi, Does anyone know how to get the relationship between primary and copy pool. Before my COPY_POOL reclamation I want to know which primary volumes I'll need to check in into the library. TIA Fernando Figueiredo EDS SAP Systems Administrator
Re: Simultaneous writes to primary and copy stgpools
A real easy way to do this is to run a backup against the storage pool. This is how I found that I had accidently turned on silultaneous writes. The daily backup of the stgpool was running, but not moving any data. cory *E-Mail Confidentiality Notice* This message (including any attachments) contains information intended for a specific individual(s) and purpose that may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. Any inappropriate use, distribution or copying of the message is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil penalty. If you have received this transmission in error, please reply to the sender indicating this error and delete the transmission from your system immediately. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/11/2004 11:37:36 AM ** High Priority ** check for maximum scratch tapes in copy pool and increase if require also, check for copy pools list on 'copy storage Pool' column in primary storage pool. I am doing for couple of pools in same way. muthyam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/11/2004 11:21:13 AM I checked tape mounts when migrating from diskpool to tapepool and saw only one mount from that tapepool and no tape mount from any copypool. Thanks. Gus [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/11/2004 9:35:50 AM ** High Priority ** I would check for mounts and where that tapes belongs to when that job is running. muthyam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/11/2004 9:25:54 AM Hi, TSMers, My primary LTO tapepools have two copypools, on and offsite as COPYPOOL option for simultaneous writes when migrating data from diskpool. How would you verify if this option is working for you from server console? Thanks much. Gus This electronic mail transmission contains information from Joy Mining Machinery which is confidential, and is intended only for the use of the proper addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately at the return address on this transmission, or by telephone at (724) 779-4500, and delete this message and any attachments from your system. Unauthorized use, copying, disclosing, distributing, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this transmission is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. privacy
Client installation stucked very HARD.
hi all , i hope somebody can help me ... i cannot believe this, i have never seen this before client AIX 5.2 ml3, 32bit kernel, everything is ok and in great shape but when doing simple install throug smit (i-ve done that 300 times before) of 5.2.3.0 client i cracks with this messagess installp: APPLYING software for: tivoli.tsm.client.ba.32bit.common 5.2.3.0 tivoli.tsm.client.ba.32bit.web 5.2.3.0 tivoli.tsm.client.ba.32bit.base 5.2.3.0 restore: 0511-147 Unpacking file size error. The original size of ./usr/lpp/tivoli.tsm.client.ba.32bit/liblpp.a is 106430; restored size is 106421. restore: 0511-708 There is an internal unpacking error: decode failure restore: 0511-121 Out of space. 0503-405 installp: An error occurred while running the restore command. Use local problem reporting procedures. there is enough space everywhere, the files downloaded in auto mode with smartftp which was successuful everytime i did that ... i really dont know where to look now so i'm here for help. thanks. goran konjich senior unix admin tsm 5.2.3.1 p640 x 6 fcs 2109 x 6 lto 3584 x 6 ssa 1TB
Re: How long did each client take to backup?
The easy way is to meke sql query: select * from summary You can see the columns and make additional filtering or grouping ot what you need Regards, Svetoslav Tolev Coats, Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12.08.2004 14:11 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject How long did each client take to backup? Is there a query or SQL query I could run to get me that can tell me, on a per client basis, how long the backup took from the servers perspective for each backup that ran in the last 24 hours? TIA ... JC
Re: NetWare 6.5 Cluster with memory leak
Flemming, We have had similar problems as well. We have updated to the TSA5UP15 patch and all of the machines that have that update no longer have the memory problems. Regards, Darren [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/12/04 02:39AM Hi All ;o) I've got an consitent problem with TSM and NetWare 6.5 Cluster enviroments! At several customers sites, I've noticed that they are forced to restart the clusternode's within 14 - 30 days (depending on the amount of RAM) - The funny thing is, that it don't seem to be the backup modules there are having this defect due to the fact that a similarly machine without cluster just keeps on running... So what are we talking about... - NetWare 6.5 Cluster - SP1 - TSM Client 5.2.2.3 - TSA5UP13 14 Any ideas Best regards Flemming ___ www.kmd.dk www.kundenet.kmd.dk www.eboks.dk www.civitas.dk www.netborger.dk Hvis du har modtaget denne mail ved en fejl vil jeg gerne, at du informerer mig og sletter den. KMD skaber it-services, der fremmer effektivitet hos det offentlige, erhvervslivet og borgerne. If you received this e-mail by mistake, please notify me and delete it. Thank you. Our mission is to enhance the efficiency of the public sector and improve its service of the general public.
storage agent device support?
Hey! We are going to install the storage agent onto our solaris and AIX servers and it states that we should install the SCSI device support TICsm Sdev, but we have already installed the IBM device drivers (ATape and IBMtape). Do we have to install Tivoli's device support code? My thoughts are that it isn't needed with our configuration. (We have LTO2 drives in an STK SL8500 library) Also, does the regular TSM client and the Storage agent have to be at the same level? Thank you! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: storage agent device support?
Hi Joni If you are using IBM LTO2 drives, only the Atape driver or its Solaris equivalent have to be installed. As for the Version levels for server and storage agent, checkout the 5.2.3.0 readme file, there has been some improvement as to what is supported. ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/server/v5r2/AIX/5.2.3.0/TSMSRVAIX5230.README.SRV Guillaume Gilbert IT Specialist - TSM Infrastructure Services Delivery IBM Global Services Tel.: (514) 964-2795 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Joni Moyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-12 08:56 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject storage agent device support? Hey! We are going to install the storage agent onto our solaris and AIX servers and it states that we should install the SCSI device support TICsm Sdev, but we have already installed the IBM device drivers (ATape and IBMtape). Do we have to install Tivoli's device support code? My thoughts are that it isn't needed with our configuration. (We have LTO2 drives in an STK SL8500 library) Also, does the regular TSM client and the Storage agent have to be at the same level? Thank you! Joni Moyer Highmark Storage Systems Work:(717)302-6603 Fax:(717)302-5974 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Missed schedule ?
Hi Everybody, I've set myself up in Tivoli to be sent the summary report of the previous night's backup.When I checked the mail, it informed me that I had missed 5 schedules for 5 different servers, each one an incremental backup. However, when I view the dsmsched.log, I see that the backup went through. what does Missed mean ? The dsmcad process was running on all 5 Missed servers so I'm not sure what this means. I'm running TSM 5.2.2 on AIX 5.2 and backuping up AIX 4.3.3,5.1 and 5.2 servers nightly at 8:00 PM. Here's an example of one of the dsmsched.log on a server: 08/11/04 22:47:10 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects inspected: 250,206 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects backed up: 236 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects updated: 0 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects rebound: 0 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects deleted: 0 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects expired: 4 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects failed: 0 08/11/04 22:47:11 Total number of bytes transferred: 7.10 GB 08/11/04 22:47:11 Data transfer time:3,790.58 sec 08/11/04 22:47:11 Network data transfer rate:1,965.15 KB/sec 08/11/04 22:47:11 Aggregate data transfer rate:839.66 KB/sec 08/11/04 22:47:11 Objects compressed by: 78% 08/11/04 22:47:11 Elapsed processing time: 02:27:51 08/11/04 22:47:11 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS END 08/11/04 22:47:11 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT END AIX 08/12/04 20:00:00 08/11/04 22:47:11 Scheduled event 'AIX' completed successfully. 08/11/04 22:47:11 Sending results for scheduled event 'AIX'. 08/11/04 22:47:11 Results sent to server for scheduled event 'AIX'. 08/11/04 22:47:11 Querying server for next scheduled event. 08/11/04 22:47:11 Node Name: JUPITER 08/11/04 22:47:11 Session established with server WEST-TSM: AIX-RS/6000 08/11/04 22:47:11 Server Version 5, Release 2, Level 2.0 08/11/04 22:47:11 Server date/time: 08/11/04 22:48:08 Last access: 08/11/ 04 20:20:16 08/11/04 22:47:11 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY BEGIN 08/11/04 22:47:11 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY END 08/11/04 22:47:11 Next operation scheduled: 08/11/04 22:47:11 08/11/04 22:47:11 Schedule Name: AIX 08/11/04 22:47:11 Action:Incremental 08/11/04 22:47:11 Objects: 08/11/04 22:47:11 Options: 08/11/04 22:47:11 Server Window Start: 20:00:00 on 08/13/04 08/11/04 22:47:11 08/11/04 22:47:11 Scheduler has been stopped. This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen.
Re: NetWare 6.5 Cluster with memory leak
You should upgrade the TSM client, as well. I had a variety of issues and then upgraded to the 5.2.2.9 level. There are a few entries in the README for 5.2.2.9 that talks about memory leaks and such ! 5.2.3.0 is the latest level ! Hougaard.Flemming FHG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/12/2004 03:39 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject NetWare 6.5 Cluster with memory leak Hi All ;o) I've got an consitent problem with TSM and NetWare 6.5 Cluster enviroments! At several customers sites, I've noticed that they are forced to restart the clusternode's within 14 - 30 days (depending on the amount of RAM) - The funny thing is, that it don't seem to be the backup modules there are having this defect due to the fact that a similarly machine without cluster just keeps on running... So what are we talking about... - NetWare 6.5 Cluster - SP1 - TSM Client 5.2.2.3 - TSA5UP13 14 Any ideas Best regards Flemming ___ www.kmd.dk www.kundenet.kmd.dk www.eboks.dk www.civitas.dk www.netborger.dk Hvis du har modtaget denne mail ved en fejl vil jeg gerne, at du informerer mig og sletter den. KMD skaber it-services, der fremmer effektivitet hos det offentlige, erhvervslivet og borgerne. If you received this e-mail by mistake, please notify me and delete it. Thank you. Our mission is to enhance the efficiency of the public sector and improve its service of the general public.
Re: How long did each client take to backup?
Hi, This seemed very usefull, but I don't find all backup clients in this table. Only some of the client machines show in the entity field. Any reason for this? Thanks, Geert ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/08/2004 14:41:43: The easy way is to meke sql query: select * from summary You can see the columns and make additional filtering or grouping ot what you need Regards, Svetoslav Tolev Coats, Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12.08.2004 14:11 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject How long did each client take to backup? Is there a query or SQL query I could run to get me that can tell me, on a per client basis, how long the backup took from the servers perspective for each backup that ran in the last 24 hours? TIA ... JC
Re: Missed schedule ?
Missed means the schedule did not run or even start. Mostly the cause at my site is the the scheduler or dsmcad was not running to accept contact from TSM server. Check carefully what schedule was missed and what you got a summary report from saying o.k. Do you have multiple schedules for some servers? Do you have multiple clients using same schedule? David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5509 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/12/04 09:16AM Hi Everybody, I've set myself up in Tivoli to be sent the summary report of the previous night's backup.When I checked the mail, it informed me that I had missed 5 schedules for 5 different servers, each one an incremental backup. However, when I view the dsmsched.log, I see that the backup went through. what does Missed mean ? The dsmcad process was running on all 5 Missed servers so I'm not sure what this means. I'm running TSM 5.2.2 on AIX 5.2 and backuping up AIX 4.3.3,5.1 and 5.2 servers nightly at 8:00 PM. Here's an example of one of the dsmsched.log on a server: 08/11/04 22:47:10 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects inspected: 250,206 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects backed up: 236 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects updated: 0 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects rebound: 0 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects deleted: 0 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects expired: 4 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects failed: 0 08/11/04 22:47:11 Total number of bytes transferred: 7.10 GB 08/11/04 22:47:11 Data transfer time:3,790.58 sec 08/11/04 22:47:11 Network data transfer rate:1,965.15 KB/sec 08/11/04 22:47:11 Aggregate data transfer rate:839.66 KB/sec 08/11/04 22:47:11 Objects compressed by: 78% 08/11/04 22:47:11 Elapsed processing time: 02:27:51 08/11/04 22:47:11 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS END 08/11/04 22:47:11 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT END AIX 08/12/04 20:00:00 08/11/04 22:47:11 Scheduled event 'AIX' completed successfully. 08/11/04 22:47:11 Sending results for scheduled event 'AIX'. 08/11/04 22:47:11 Results sent to server for scheduled event 'AIX'. 08/11/04 22:47:11 Querying server for next scheduled event. 08/11/04 22:47:11 Node Name: JUPITER 08/11/04 22:47:11 Session established with server WEST-TSM: AIX-RS/6000 08/11/04 22:47:11 Server Version 5, Release 2, Level 2.0 08/11/04 22:47:11 Server date/time: 08/11/04 22:48:08 Last access: 08/11/ 04 20:20:16 08/11/04 22:47:11 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY BEGIN 08/11/04 22:47:11 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY END 08/11/04 22:47:11 Next operation scheduled: 08/11/04 22:47:11 08/11/04 22:47:11 Schedule Name: AIX 08/11/04 22:47:11 Action:Incremental 08/11/04 22:47:11 Objects: 08/11/04 22:47:11 Options: 08/11/04 22:47:11 Server Window Start: 20:00:00 on 08/13/04 08/11/04 22:47:11 08/11/04 22:47:11 Scheduler has been stopped. This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ## This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the
Selective backups
Hi All, never tried this, but we are going to replace some hardware over the weekend, and want to schedule a complete backup of the server. Below is what I set up, but wondered if I needed to put the filespaces in the objects box. Since I'm running a selective backup, do I need to specify filespaces in the objects box or not? Here is my setup. Thank you for your help! Client schedules : ORACLE_RMAN PORA_SELECTIVE Policy Domain Name ORACLE_RMAN Schedule Name PORA_SELECTIVE Description Pora migration to new box Action SELECTIVE Options - Objects / /usr/ /opt/ /u01/ /u02/ /u03/ /u04/ /u05/ /u06/ /u07/ /u08/ /u09/ /u10/ /u11/ /u12/ /u13/ /u14/ /u15/ /u16/ /u17/ /u18/ /u19/ Priority 5 Start date 2004-07-21 Start time 18:00:00 Duration 1 Duration units HOURS Period - Period units ONETIME Day of Week FRIDAY Expiration - Last Update Date/Time 2004-08-12 08:24:34.00 Last Update by (administrator) ADMIN Managing profile -
Re: Missed schedule ?
I checked, and the dsmcad was running on all five missed servers. I have two schedules, one for the AIX backup and one for Windows. But according to my origianl post, the tail of the dsmsched.log shows as the backup having executed ?!?!?!? -Original Message- From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 9:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Missed schedule ? Missed means the schedule did not run or even start. Mostly the cause at my site is the the scheduler or dsmcad was not running to accept contact from TSM server. Check carefully what schedule was missed and what you got a summary report from saying o.k. Do you have multiple schedules for some servers? Do you have multiple clients using same schedule? David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5509 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/12/04 09:16AM Hi Everybody, I've set myself up in Tivoli to be sent the summary report of the previous night's backup.When I checked the mail, it informed me that I had missed 5 schedules for 5 different servers, each one an incremental backup. However, when I view the dsmsched.log, I see that the backup went through. what does Missed mean ? The dsmcad process was running on all 5 Missed servers so I'm not sure what this means. I'm running TSM 5.2.2 on AIX 5.2 and backuping up AIX 4.3.3,5.1 and 5.2 servers nightly at 8:00 PM. Here's an example of one of the dsmsched.log on a server: 08/11/04 22:47:10 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects inspected: 250,206 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects backed up: 236 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects updated: 0 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects rebound: 0 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects deleted: 0 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects expired: 4 08/11/04 22:47:10 Total number of objects failed: 0 08/11/04 22:47:11 Total number of bytes transferred: 7.10 GB 08/11/04 22:47:11 Data transfer time:3,790.58 sec 08/11/04 22:47:11 Network data transfer rate:1,965.15 KB/sec 08/11/04 22:47:11 Aggregate data transfer rate:839.66 KB/sec 08/11/04 22:47:11 Objects compressed by: 78% 08/11/04 22:47:11 Elapsed processing time: 02:27:51 08/11/04 22:47:11 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS END 08/11/04 22:47:11 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT END AIX 08/12/04 20:00:00 08/11/04 22:47:11 Scheduled event 'AIX' completed successfully. 08/11/04 22:47:11 Sending results for scheduled event 'AIX'. 08/11/04 22:47:11 Results sent to server for scheduled event 'AIX'. 08/11/04 22:47:11 Querying server for next scheduled event. 08/11/04 22:47:11 Node Name: JUPITER 08/11/04 22:47:11 Session established with server WEST-TSM: AIX-RS/6000 08/11/04 22:47:11 Server Version 5, Release 2, Level 2.0 08/11/04 22:47:11 Server date/time: 08/11/04 22:48:08 Last access: 08/11/ 04 20:20:16 08/11/04 22:47:11 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY BEGIN 08/11/04 22:47:11 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY END 08/11/04 22:47:11 Next operation scheduled: 08/11/04 22:47:11 08/11/04 22:47:11 Schedule Name: AIX 08/11/04 22:47:11 Action:Incremental 08/11/04 22:47:11 Objects: 08/11/04 22:47:11 Options: 08/11/04 22:47:11 Server Window Start: 20:00:00 on 08/13/04 08/11/04 22:47:11 08/11/04 22:47:11 Scheduler has been stopped. This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protigi. L'expiditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) disigni(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immidiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ## This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use,
Re: How long did each client take to backup?
This seemed very usefull, but I don't find all backup clients in this table. Only some of the client machines show in the entity field. Any reason for this? See innumerable past postings about the Summary Table and reliability. The missing clients are probably 5.1, which had problems in this area. The Events table and TSM accounting data have proved more reliable over time. Richard Sims Life itself is incremental.
Re: How long did each client take to backup?
Richard, Thanks for the info. Geert ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/08/2004 15:39:12: This seemed very usefull, but I don't find all backup clients in this table. Only some of the client machines show in the entity field. Any reason for this? See innumerable past postings about the Summary Table and reliability. The missing clients are probably 5.1, which had problems in this area. The Events table and TSM accounting data have proved more reliable over time. Richard Sims Life itself is incremental.
Re: 3494 in degraded modus
Check the install READMEs. One of the TSM 5.2.xx READMEs specifies a minimum atape level. David [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/11/2004 2:55:23 PM Hi, our 3494 magstar library is running VERY slow. Take 10-20 mn to mount a tape (3590). A checkin with checklabel=no takes 1-2 mn ! We upgraded our TSM server to 5.2.3.0 (under AIX5.2 build 2 fix 6). Could anybody say which level of atape driver and library firmware they use? Any other tip ? Thanks in advance, René LAMBELET NESTEC SA GLOBE - Global Business Excellence Central Support Center SD/ESN Av. Nestlé 55 CH-1800 Vevey (Switzerland) tél +41 (0)21 924'35'43 fax +41 (0)21 924'45'89 local REL-5 01 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential.
duration between two retries of a changing file backup
hi all, i have a duration of the backup retries of a changed file about 30 minutes. i want to change. is there a parameter to set the duration between two retries of a changing file backup . thanks you _ Dialoguez en direct et gratuitement avec vos amis sur http://g.msn.fr/FR1001/866 MSN Messenger !
can't connect to client gui
Hi everyone I can't connect to a client gui to do a restore when I try I get The paged connect displayed this just happened all of a sudden as I had been connecting to it earlier. Can anyone tell me the possible causes? Thanks for any help/causes Sun client version 4.2 TSM 5.2.1.3 aix 5.2
Files Previously Excluded: Rebound or New?
Hello all, How does TSM handle files that were excluded but now are being backed up? Does it statistically consider these files to be re-bound or just new? I would guess it would see them as new, but I have seen in some cases the re-bound file counts spike and level off on some servers that we recently did this to. Just curious. Thanks, Rob
Re: How long did each client take to backup?
Thanks to all who replied. ... Sofar I have Select Entity,Start_Time,Stop_time,successful from summary - where activity='BACKUP' order by entity But I am having problems getting into the where clause the eqivalent of AND start_time TODAY -1 at 08:00 Yes, I know the 'TODAY -1 at 08:00' syntax is wrong, but that is the current issue. ... Suggestions? I am glad to post a summary for future reference when git is going if there is interest. (If you have interest, e-mail me directly rather than post ... just keeps down non-list information on the list!) -Original Message- From: Coats, Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 6:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How long did each client take to backup? Is there a query or SQL query I could run to get me that can tell me, on a per client basis, how long the backup took from the servers perspective for each backup that ran in the last 24 hours? TIA ... JC
Solution for Licensing Issue
While moving our TSM setup to a new server, I was having trouble with the license installation. I'd sworn I'd installed all of the proper license packages, but I still got the expiring evaluation licenses on the server. The problem was that the new server was running AIX 5.2, and I'd installed *both* tivoli.tsm.license.rte *and* tivoli.tsm.license.aix5.rte64. I removed license.rte, license.aix5.rte64, and license.cert. I then reinstalled license.aix5.rte64 and license.cert and all was well. I mention it here because I Googled the problem, and saw the question on the list, but not an answer. -- Jason A. Specland Senior Unix Administrator - Weill Cornell Medical College [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: can't connect to client gui
Do you have the client agent running? Fernando Figueiredo -Original Message- From: Timothy Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: quinta-feira, 12 de Agosto de 2004 15:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: can't connect to client gui Hi everyone I can't connect to a client gui to do a restore when I try I get The paged connect displayed this just happened all of a sudden as I had been connecting to it earlier. Can anyone tell me the possible causes? Thanks for any help/causes Sun client version 4.2 TSM 5.2.1.3 aix 5.2
Re: duration between two retries of a changing file backup
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hassan hani i have a duration of the backup retries of a changed file about 30 minutes. i want to change. is there a parameter to set the duration between two retries of a changing file backup . Retries for changed files restart almost immediately. The probable reason yours is taking so long is that the file is quite large, and it takes thirty minutes to back up the individual file. If the file(s) in question is not large, then you may have connectivity issues or network speed/duplex setting issues. -- Mark Stapleton
Re: How long did each client take to backup?
Try and (start_time between current_timestamp - 24 hours and current_timestamp) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coats, Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/12/2004 09:57 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: How long did each client take to backup? Thanks to all who replied. ... Sofar I have Select Entity,Start_Time,Stop_time,successful from summary - where activity='BACKUP' order by entity But I am having problems getting into the where clause the eqivalent of AND start_time TODAY -1 at 08:00 Yes, I know the 'TODAY -1 at 08:00' syntax is wrong, but that is the current issue. ... Suggestions? I am glad to post a summary for future reference when git is going if there is interest. (If you have interest, e-mail me directly rather than post ... just keeps down non-list information on the list!) -Original Message- From: Coats, Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 6:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How long did each client take to backup? Is there a query or SQL query I could run to get me that can tell me, on a per client basis, how long the backup took from the servers perspective for each backup that ran in the last 24 hours? TIA ... JC
TSM 5.2 and AIX 5.1 -Any known issues?
Hello Everybody, Looking for feedback on stability issues with the following scenerio? Anyone know of any issues with running TSM 5.2 and AIX 5.1? Current Setup: Tivoli Version 5.1.6.5 Aix 5.1 P660 Library =IBM 3584-LTO 1 We are planning to upgrade Tivoli to 5.2.3 while AIX is still at 5.1 1. UpgradeTivoli from 5.1.6.55.1.7.05.1.7.35.25.2.3 (5.1.7.3 upgrade for IBM flash10258 to ensure right fixes before running the Cleanup Backup Groups utility) 2. Tivoli to 5.2.3 while AIX is still at 5.1 3. Then upgrade AIX to 5.2, Replacing P660 with P650 4. Then install new library Scaler I2000, LTO1 and LTO2, Partition ADIC lib 2 instances of TSM server. (Current and Content Manger) 2 LPAR, 1ST LPAR Prod TSM (Current and Content Manger) , 2ND Test TSM Keep current IP for prod TSM, should we have another or CM Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (716) 887-7979 Pager: (716) 470-0141 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: can't connect to client gui
Thanks Fernando that was it! Gui was not running Fernando Figueiredo (EDS) wrote: Do you have the client agent running? Fernando Figueiredo -Original Message- From: Timothy Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: quinta-feira, 12 de Agosto de 2004 15:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: can't connect to client gui Hi everyone I can't connect to a client gui to do a restore when I try I get The paged connect displayed this just happened all of a sudden as I had been connecting to it earlier. Can anyone tell me the possible causes? Thanks for any help/causes Sun client version 4.2 TSM 5.2.1.3 aix 5.2
Re: NetWare 6.5 Cluster with memory leak
Anyone running NW65 SP2 yet? If so, has SP2 fixed any of the memory leaks? David Ehresman University of Louisville
Re: Selective backups
Mark, The schedule looks good; however ,I believe that each object should be surrounded by similar to below. Yes, you will need to specify filespaces. Also you should add -subdir=yes and also you can list a maximum of 20 objects.I see you have more than 20 filespaces, so if you are going to take this route 2 separate schedules are required, 20,2 (objects). Based on my experience, I will say that running selective backup is not fun an incremental. Action: Selective Options: -SUBDIR=YES Objects: / /usr/ /var/ /tmp/ /home/ /usr/local/ /opt/ /var/adm/perfmgr/ /usr/local/backups/ /ppl/ /opt/patrol/ Priority: 5 Sung Mark Hayden [EMAIL PROTECTED] E.IL.US To Sent by: ADSM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dist Stor cc Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject .EDU Selective backups 08/12/2004 09:29 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Hi All, never tried this, but we are going to replace some hardware over the weekend, and want to schedule a complete backup of the server. Below is what I set up, but wondered if I needed to put the filespaces in the objects box. Since I'm running a selective backup, do I need to specify filespaces in the objects box or not? Here is my setup. Thank you for your help! Client schedules : ORACLE_RMAN PORA_SELECTIVE Policy Domain Name ORACLE_RMAN Schedule Name PORA_SELECTIVE Description Pora migration to new box Action SELECTIVE Options - Objects / /usr/ /opt/ /u01/ /u02/ /u03/ /u04/ /u05/ /u06/ /u07/ /u08/ /u09/ /u10/ /u11/ /u12/ /u13/ /u14/ /u15/ /u16/ /u17/ /u18/ /u19/ Priority 5 Start date 2004-07-21 Start time 18:00:00 Duration 1 Duration units HOURS Period - Period units ONETIME Day of Week FRIDAY Expiration - Last Update Date/Time 2004-08-12 08:24:34.00 Last Update by (administrator) ADMIN Managing profile - inline: graycol.gifinline: pic03062.gifinline: ecblank.gif
Re: NetWare 6.5 Cluster with memory leak
On 12 Aug 2004 at 11:35, David E Ehresman wrote: Anyone running NW65 SP2 yet? If so, has SP2 fixed any of the memory leaks? David Ehresman University of Louisville I think that it has - or certainly reduced them! Tom == Tom Anstey Institute of Molecular Medicine Oxford University Oxford OX3 9DS UK
Select statement help.
Ok, this should be simple, but it's driving me nuts. I have 2 simple select statements that I'm trying to combine into 1 but it's not working. Here are the 2 scripts and their output: tsm: TSMSERV1Aselect STGPOOL_NAME, MAXSCRATCH from stgpools where DEVCLASS like '3590DEV' STGPOOL_NAMEMAXSCRATCH -- --- A_COPYPOOL 200 A_TAPEPOOL 500 COL_FS_TAPEPOOL500 COPYPOOL 1000 DB_TAPEPOOL 1000 I_TAPEPOOL 500 tsm: TSMSERV1Aselect STGPOOL_NAME, (count(VOLUME_NAME))as # of tapes from volumes where DEVCLASS_NAME like '3590DEV' group by STGPOOL_NAME STGPOOL_NAME# of tapes -- --- A_COPYPOOL 7 A_TAPEPOOL 9 COL_FS_TAPEPOOL222 COPYPOOL 401 DB_TAPEPOOL262 I_TAPEPOOL 106 I would simply like to combine them into 1 script so that it is easier to compare the Maxscratch value with the actual number of tapes being used. Trying various things like: select vo.STGPOOL_NAME, st.STGPOOL_NAME, (count(vo.VOLUME_NAME))as # of tapes, st.MAXSCRATCH from volumes vo, stgpools st where vo.DEVCLASS_NAME like '3590DEV' and vo.STGPOOL_NAME=st.STGPOOL_NAME group by vo.STGPOOL_NAME But it's not working... any help? Thanks, Ben
TSM 5.2.2 64bit on AIX 5.2 64bit
Hi All, I have recently upgraded TSM to version 5.2.2 (32bit) but needed 64bit for sql-backtrack. IBM told me to uninstall all 32bit filesets and install the 64bit filesets which I did. Now I have no client software listed and can only use the web interface. dsmadmc no longer works..and there is no scheduler dsmc sched? Here is what I currently have installed: Tivoli_Management_Agent.client.rte tivoli.tivguid 1.1.0.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli GUID on AIX 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager tivoli.tsm.license.cert5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager tivoli.tsm.license.rte 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Web 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager tivoli.tsm.server.com 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager tivoli.tsm.server.rte 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Tivoli_Management_Agent.client.rte tivoli.tivguid 1.1.0.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli GUID on AIX 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager tivoli.tsm.server.com 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager tivoli.tsm.server.rte 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Any help would be greatly appreciated. Laura
Re: Select statement help.
I took your code and added a max function. Not sure if this is the best SQL way to deal with it but it makes the group by happy and seems to work: select max(st.STGPOOL_NAME) as STGPOOL, max(st.maxscratch) as MAXSCRATCH, (count(vo.VOLUME_NAME))as # of tapes from volumes vo, stgpools st where vo.DEVCLASS_NAME like 'LTO%' and vo.STGPOOL_NAME=st.STGPOOL_NAME group by vo.STGPOOL_NAME -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Bullock Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 11:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Select statement help. Ok, this should be simple, but it's driving me nuts. I have 2 simple select statements that I'm trying to combine into 1 but it's not working. Here are the 2 scripts and their output: tsm: TSMSERV1Aselect STGPOOL_NAME, MAXSCRATCH from stgpools where DEVCLASS like '3590DEV' STGPOOL_NAMEMAXSCRATCH -- --- A_COPYPOOL 200 A_TAPEPOOL 500 COL_FS_TAPEPOOL500 COPYPOOL 1000 DB_TAPEPOOL 1000 I_TAPEPOOL 500 tsm: TSMSERV1Aselect STGPOOL_NAME, (count(VOLUME_NAME))as # of tapes from volumes where DEVCLASS_NAME like '3590DEV' group by STGPOOL_NAME STGPOOL_NAME# of tapes -- --- A_COPYPOOL 7 A_TAPEPOOL 9 COL_FS_TAPEPOOL222 COPYPOOL 401 DB_TAPEPOOL262 I_TAPEPOOL 106 I would simply like to combine them into 1 script so that it is easier to compare the Maxscratch value with the actual number of tapes being used. Trying various things like: select vo.STGPOOL_NAME, st.STGPOOL_NAME, (count(vo.VOLUME_NAME))as # of tapes, st.MAXSCRATCH from volumes vo, stgpools st where vo.DEVCLASS_NAME like '3590DEV' and vo.STGPOOL_NAME=st.STGPOOL_NAME group by vo.STGPOOL_NAME But it's not working... any help? Thanks, Ben
ANR6913W - no volumes with backup data exist in copy storage pool
Hey all, Every day when I run DR prepare, I've been getting this warning message for one of my copy storage pools: ANR6913W PREPARE: No volumes with backup data exist in copy storage pool COPY_POOL_2. I've looked up the verbage on the warning, and it says: ANR6913W Command: No volumes with backup data exist in copy storage pool storage pool name. Explanation: A copy storage pool does not contain any volumes with usable data. System Action: Stanzas in the recovery plan do not include recovery information for any volumes in the storage pool. User Response: Determine why this storage pool has no volumes with usable data. So, I search the copy pool and it does contain volumes, and they do have something on them. When I look at the DR plan, these volumes do show up in the RECOVERY.VOLUMES.REQUIRED section. So, I'm stumped. What does this mean? I have other copy storage pools, but this one is the only one that seems to generate the message. What am I not seeing? Thanks, T. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Re: ANR6913W - no volumes with backup data exist in copy storage pool
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Lists Every day when I run DR prepare, I've been getting this warning message for one of my copy storage pools: ANR6913W PREPARE: No volumes with backup data exist in copy storage pool COPY_POOL_2. Have you run SET DRMCOPYSTGPOOL to the name(s) of your copy pools? You can check this by running QUERY DRMSTATUS and seeing if your copy pools appear in the Copy Storage Pools line. TSM does not automatically know that a given copy pool will be used for DR purposes. You must tell it to do so. -- Mark Stapleton
Re: ANR6913W - no volumes with backup data exist in copy storage pool
Yes, this storage pool does show up under Copy Storage Pools from a q drmstatus. --- Stapleton, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Lists Every day when I run DR prepare, I've been getting this warning message for one of my copy storage pools: ANR6913W PREPARE: No volumes with backup data exist in copy storage pool COPY_POOL_2. Have you run SET DRMCOPYSTGPOOL to the name(s) of your copy pools? You can check this by running QUERY DRMSTATUS and seeing if your copy pools appear in the Copy Storage Pools line. TSM does not automatically know that a given copy pool will be used for DR purposes. You must tell it to do so. -- Mark Stapleton __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Re: ANR6913W - no volumes with backup data exist in copy storage pool
The access on all except one is OFFSITE. That one is UNAVAILABLE, but that's the one that's getting sent off-site today. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Tracy - The message description qualifies the condition as *usable* volumes, which may be the key. I would query the copy storage pool and its volumes, and see if all are in a usable state (not Unavailable or the like). The message is rather vague, so it's one of those situations where the customer has to hunt around. Richard Sims __ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
incremental backup question
Does anyone know why I am seeing these messages: 08/12/2004 03:48:43 Successful incremental backup of '\\server001\e$\Users\NRodier\WoodMac CAT\*' 08/12/2004 03:48:58 Successful incremental backup of '\\server001\e$\Users\PCampisi\tsy\*' Instead of: Successful incremental backup of '\\server001\e$' This server being backed up in a schedule with over a dozen other servers defined by using the web gui. There aren't any domain statements in the dsm.opt and no include statements other the the generic include * management-class. There are lots of exclude statements. I am running TSM Server 5.1.9 (AIX) and this is from a TSM client 5.1.7 (w2k). Thanks, Ralph
FW: TSM 5.2.2 64bit on AIX 5.2 64bit
Subject: TSM 5.2.2 64bit on AIX 5.2 64bit Hi All, I have recently upgraded TSM to version 5.2.2 (32bit) but needed 64bit for sql-backtrack. IBM told me to uninstall all 32bit filesets and install the 64bit filesets which I did. Now I have no client software listed and can only use the web interface. dsmadmc no longer works..and there is no scheduler dsmc sched? Here is what I currently have installed: Tivoli_Management_Agent.client.rte tivoli.tivguid 1.1.0.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli GUID on AIX 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager tivoli.tsm.license.cert5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager tivoli.tsm.license.rte 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Web 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager tivoli.tsm.server.com 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager tivoli.tsm.server.rte 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Tivoli_Management_Agent.client.rte tivoli.tivguid 1.1.0.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli GUID on AIX 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager tivoli.tsm.server.com 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager tivoli.tsm.server.rte 5.2.2.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Any help would be greatly appreciated. Laura
Re: incremental backup question
These directories are being targeted for the backup in some fashion. Review the dsmsched.log file from the beginning (of the backup cycle) to see what is going on. Check the schedule definition on the server. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/12/2004 12:26:32: Does anyone know why I am seeing these messages: 08/12/2004 03:48:43 Successful incremental backup of '\\server001\e$\Users\NRodier\WoodMac CAT\*' 08/12/2004 03:48:58 Successful incremental backup of '\\server001\e$\Users\PCampisi\tsy\*' Instead of: Successful incremental backup of '\\server001\e$' This server being backed up in a schedule with over a dozen other servers defined by using the web gui. There aren't any domain statements in the dsm.opt and no include statements other the the generic include * management-class. There are lots of exclude statements. I am running TSM Server 5.1.9 (AIX) and this is from a TSM client 5.1.7 (w2k). Thanks, Ralph
Re: incremental backup question
I've been looking and looking but don't see how they are being targeted even before I sent out my question. The schedule is squeaky clean. I even created a brand new schedule just for this one and ran it this afternoon. The same thing happened. I will keep looking and thanks for responding. Ralph -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: August 12, 2004 3:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: incremental backup question These directories are being targeted for the backup in some fashion. Review the dsmsched.log file from the beginning (of the backup cycle) to see what is going on. Check the schedule definition on the server. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/12/2004 12:26:32: Does anyone know why I am seeing these messages: 08/12/2004 03:48:43 Successful incremental backup of '\\server001\e$\Users\NRodier\WoodMac CAT\*' 08/12/2004 03:48:58 Successful incremental backup of '\\server001\e$\Users\PCampisi\tsy\*' Instead of: Successful incremental backup of '\\server001\e$' This server being backed up in a schedule with over a dozen other servers defined by using the web gui. There aren't any domain statements in the dsm.opt and no include statements other the the generic include * management-class. There are lots of exclude statements. I am running TSM Server 5.1.9 (AIX) and this is from a TSM client 5.1.7 (w2k). Thanks, Ralph
Re: incremental backup question
Well... it's difficult to give a better answer when I have so little to go on. If you were to post a copy of the (complete) dsmsched.log file, your options file, complete schedule definition, and error log, then I can take a better look and see what's going on. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/12/2004 12:47:59: I've been looking and looking but don't see how they are being targeted even before I sent out my question. The schedule is squeaky clean. I even created a brand new schedule just for this one and ran it this afternoon. The same thing happened. I will keep looking and thanks for responding. Ralph -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: August 12, 2004 3:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: incremental backup question These directories are being targeted for the backup in some fashion. Review the dsmsched.log file from the beginning (of the backup cycle) to see what is going on. Check the schedule definition on the server. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/12/2004 12:26:32: Does anyone know why I am seeing these messages: 08/12/2004 03:48:43 Successful incremental backup of '\\server001\e$\Users\NRodier\WoodMac CAT\*' 08/12/2004 03:48:58 Successful incremental backup of '\\server001\e$\Users\PCampisi\tsy\*' Instead of: Successful incremental backup of '\\server001\e$' This server being backed up in a schedule with over a dozen other servers defined by using the web gui. There aren't any domain statements in the dsm.opt and no include statements other the the generic include * management-class. There are lots of exclude statements. I am running TSM Server 5.1.9 (AIX) and this is from a TSM client 5.1.7 (w2k). Thanks, Ralph
OT: How to prune all those other Win log files?
This is a Windows question, not a TSM question ... How can you prune a log file (not dsmsched.log or dsmerror.log) to keep it to a manageable size? We've got a lot of other log files generated by the TDP software on the clients, and they are growing quite large. Were this unix, I'd just tail out the last 100 or so lines of the file and save that. How can you accomplish something similar with Windows/MSDos? __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Multiple nodes in dsm.opt (or dsm.sys).
Client is 5.2.2.9 running on AIX5.2 with HACMP. On AIX, how do I setup the baclient to recognize more than one node name, so I can start multiple dsmc sched processes; one for the local drives, and one for each shared resource group (I have made this work on Windows boxes, but this is the first time I have had to do this on AIX). I had intended to keep the dsm.opt, dsm.sys, schedule logs, inclexcl list, and error logs for the local filesystems in /usr/tivoli/tsm, and the dsm.opt, dsm.sys, logs and list for the shared resource groups on the shared disks. I need to be able to have different inclexcl lists for each nodename to ensure things get backed up to the correct nodename. ++The following two files (plus an inclexcl.lst file) exist in /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin --dsm.opt for local hard drive files: SErvername axhrtlp1 --dsm.sys for local hard drive files: SErvername axhrtlp1 COMMmethod TCPip TCPPort1500 TCPServeraddress 200.1.1.41 PASSWORDAccess generate schedlogname /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmsched.log INCLEXCL /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/inclexcl.lst errorlogname /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmerror.log schedlogretention 5 errorlogretention 5 DIRMC VCHS_DIRMC ++The following two files (plus an inclexcl.lst file) exist in /oracle/cluster/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin --dsm.opt for shared drive files: SErvername axhrorap --dsm.sys for shared drive files: SErvername axhrorap COMMmethod TCPip TCPPort1500 TCPServeraddress 200.1.1.41 PASSWORDAccess generate schedlogname /oracle/cluster/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmsched.log INCLEXCL /oracle/cluster/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/inclexcl.lst errorlogname /oracle/cluster/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmerror.log schedlogretention 5 errorlogretention 5 DIRMC VCHS_DIRMC When I execute dsmc -optfile=/oracle/cluster/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm.opt and enter the servername of axhrorap, I get the following error... 08/12/04 15:28:18 ANS1370E The user ID entered does not have the correct level of authority to access the client machine. I searched through the documentation, and nothing jumped out at me as a solution. Where can I read about how to set this up? Thanks in advance, Todd
problems programming an api for a proprietary application
I'm researching on a test Solaris tsm client, how to create api's because I have a proprietary application which tsm doesn't commercially, officially support. So I want to write an api/tdp for it. I downloaded the pdf on tsm api programming. I can't compile the api sample application with: gcc any suggestions?: # gcc dapismp.c Undefined first referenced symbol in file smpapi_update_fs/var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_setup/var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_query_exit /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_restore2 /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_archive /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_pref_verbose /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_ret_event/var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_qry_fs /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_backup /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_qry_archive /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_signon /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_pref_echoin /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_exit /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o pref/var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_qry_mc /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_rename_obj /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_log_event/var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_retrieve2/var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_pref_details /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_del_access /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_chgpw/var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_pref_recvbuff/var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_pref_exit/var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_pref_sizeest /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_del_fs /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_qry_sess /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o dsmQueryApiVersionEx/var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_qry_backup /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_del_backup /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o apiLibVer /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_del_obj /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_update_obj /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_update_arc /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_qry_version /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_set_access /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_del_archive /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_retrieve /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_pref_sendbuff/var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_qry_access /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_qry_sessOptions /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_qry_cliOptions /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o ourGetS /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_utilities_exit /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_restore /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_pref_restitem/var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o smpapi_pref_query /var/tmp/ccgsFYLT.o ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to a.out collect2: ld returned 1 exit status --Justin Richard Bleistein Unix/TSM Systems Administrator
Tivoli locking up a Win2k system?
Hi all, Has anyone ever come across an issue where the Tivoli client locks up a Win2k system? This is happening fairly regularly with one of the Win2k boxes in our environment. Here are a few small excerpts from the dsmsched.log file during the times the system locks up: --- 07/22/2004 07:06:58 Normal File-- 259,384 \\harr-facet-app\c$\WINNT\Fonts\micross.ttf 07/22/2004 09:16:06 Querying server for next scheduled event. 07/25/2004 02:56:02 Directory-- 0 \\harr-facet-app\c$\Program Files\TriZetto\Facets\311\Customer\Output\Backup-ELIG\ERISCO_8920\log 07/25/2004 23:34:33 Querying server for next scheduled event. 07/26/2004 07:09:48 Normal File--13,072 \\harr-facet-app\c$\WINNT\system32\dmintf.dll [Sent] 07/26/2004 07:09:48 Normal File-- 07/26/2004 09:00:16 Querying server for next scheduled event. 08/12/2004 17:08:20 Normal File-- 105,232 \\harr-facet-app\c$\WINNT\system32\dfssetup.dll [Sent] 08/12/2004 17:38:34 Querying server for next scheduled event. --- Those excerpts from the dsmsched.log file come from four different days ... four different days where the system locked up during a backup. As you can see, there's nothing consistent about where or when the backup is when the system locks up (which is why I'm leaning towards thinking this isn't really a TSM problem). I've talked to IBM Tivoli support. They didn't know what the problem was. I'm hoping someone here has come across this before. Many thanks, Chris Hund IBM Tivoli Administrator, Fiserv Health
Re: Tivoli locking up a Win2k system?
What version of the TSM Client are you using? Is this Windows 2000 with service pack 4? Melinda Cooper Senior Information Center Analyst Work - 425.783.4467 Pager - 425.438.5981 -Original Message- From: Chris Hund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 3:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tivoli locking up a Win2k system? Hi all, Has anyone ever come across an issue where the Tivoli client locks up a Win2k system? This is happening fairly regularly with one of the Win2k boxes in our environment. Here are a few small excerpts from the dsmsched.log file during the times the system locks up: --- 07/22/2004 07:06:58 Normal File-- 259,384 \\harr-facet-app\c$\WINNT\Fonts\micross.ttf 07/22/2004 09:16:06 Querying server for next scheduled event. 07/25/2004 02:56:02 Directory-- 0 \\harr-facet-app\c$\Program Files\TriZetto\Facets\311\Customer\Output\Backup-ELIG\ERISCO_8920\log 07/25/2004 23:34:33 Querying server for next scheduled event. 07/26/2004 07:09:48 Normal File--13,072 \\harr-facet-app\c$\WINNT\system32\dmintf.dll [Sent] 07/26/2004 07:09:48 Normal File-- 07/26/2004 09:00:16 Querying server for next scheduled event. 08/12/2004 17:08:20 Normal File-- 105,232 \\harr-facet-app\c$\WINNT\system32\dfssetup.dll [Sent] 08/12/2004 17:38:34 Querying server for next scheduled event. --- Those excerpts from the dsmsched.log file come from four different days ... four different days where the system locked up during a backup. As you can see, there's nothing consistent about where or when the backup is when the system locks up (which is why I'm leaning towards thinking this isn't really a TSM problem). I've talked to IBM Tivoli support. They didn't know what the problem was. I'm hoping someone here has come across this before. Many thanks, Chris Hund IBM Tivoli Administrator, Fiserv Health
Re: TSM 5.2 and AIX 5.1 -Any known issues?
Works fine for us Clients 5.1.5 because of the diffucilty of getting through change control on all the systems. Server 5.2.2.3 AIX 5.1 RML05 Steve Harris AIX and TSM Admin Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13/08/2004 1:30:25 Hello Everybody, Looking for feedback on stability issues with the following scenerio? Anyone know of any issues with running TSM 5.2 and AIX 5.1? Current Setup: Tivoli Version 5.1.6.5 Aix 5.1 P660 Library =IBM 3584-LTO 1 We are planning to upgrade Tivoli to 5.2.3 while AIX is still at 5.1 1. UpgradeTivoli from 5.1.6.55.1.7.05.1.7.35.25.2.3 (5.1.7.3 upgrade for IBM flash10258 to ensure right fixes before running the Cleanup Backup Groups utility) 2. Tivoli to 5.2.3 while AIX is still at 5.1 3. Then upgrade AIX to 5.2, Replacing P660 with P650 4. Then install new library Scaler I2000, LTO1 and LTO2, Partition ADIC lib 2 instances of TSM server. (Current and Content Manger) 2 LPAR, 1ST LPAR Prod TSM (Current and Content Manger) , 2ND Test TSM Keep current IP for prod TSM, should we have another or CM Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (716) 887-7979 Pager: (716) 470-0141 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. *** This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). This confidentiality is not waived or lost, if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/received in error. Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this email is prohibited. It may be subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality if it relates to health service matters. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this email in error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by telephone or by return email. You should also delete this email and destroy any hard copies produced. ***
