Re: Deleting Volumes on Copy Storage pool
Assuming that you have a valid copy of all data on the copy pool volume stored in one of your primary pools, it should not. Normally, you would always have all data in your primary pools; the main exception to this would be if you had a primary pool tape/disk go bad and you had not yet restored the primary pool data from the copy pool. --Todd Sabar Martin Hasiholan Panggabean wrote: Dear All, I have one question, if we create copy pool and if we delete the volume inside the copy pool. Will it effect the primary ? BR, Martin Panggabean -- Todd D. Taft todd_t...@unc.edu
OS/390 or z/OS as Tivoli Clients
Hi, Is it possible to setup z/OS as a client of TSM server for AIX? The goal is backing up files as well as DB2 backups from mainframe while TSM server is installed on AIX. My doubt comes from the different storage standards of mainframe and open systems such as FICON and Fibre Channel. If yes, is it free to add mainframe to an existing TSM solution? (I'v read somewhere that Tivoli Data Protection for DB2 is included in DB2) Regards, Mehdi Salehi
Re: Is TDP for Oracle LAN/Server free?
On Thursday 05 February 2009, Mehdi Salehi wrote: Hi, Correct me if I am mistaken: 1- Tivoli Data Protection for Oracle (TDPO) sends RMAN backup to storage pools via SAN (it is LAN-free). It depends. It is the TSM API (not the normal TSM backup client) that receives the data for rman. It sends the data over the LAN or the SAN to the TSM server depending on how you configure it. 2- LAN-free mechanism of TDPO is automatic, as long as the TSM and Oracle server are on the same SAN. I mean, there is no additional configuration needed to enable LAN-free cabability. No, you need to configure the TSM API for SAN based backup. Also some configuration on the SAN and TSM server must be done. A SAN backup is also going directly to tape. 3- RMAN does not affect the Oracle server CPU usage and I/O activity. No, the data has to be written and processed so there is extra CPU usage and lots of extra (read) I/O activity. Stef
Re: Can mixed incremental/selective backups be used to consolidate offsite data?
Richard, I'm mainly concerned about the Offsite volumes. We have a small library (IBM 3583) and a limited budget, so I was hoping for a simple work-around to this issue. Never mind - I guess we'll just have to live with it. Best Regards, =Adrian= -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Sims Sent: 04 February 2009 13:05 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Can mixed incremental/selective backups be used to consolidate offsite data? Adrian - The key word collocation does not appear in your question. That's the architectural solution to keeping related data together. Collocation is conventionally used for onsite volumes, but not for offsite volumes, given the substantial tape management complications that would occur with partially filled volumes: offsite volumes are usually not collocated, for that reason - but could be. Richard Sims DISCLAIMER This message is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity it is addressed to. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail. To see the full version of this disclaimer please visit the following address: http://www.lewisham.gov.uk/AboutThisSite/EmailDisclaimer.htm For advice and assistance about online security and protection from internet threats visit the Get Safe Online website at http://www.getsafeonline.org
UNsubscribe
Please remove me from the list The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
Re: OS/390 or z/OS as Tivoli Clients
The client that there is is part of z/OS USS. See Technote 1052224 and the Unix client manual. Richard Sims
TSM TDP LAN backup
Kindly Help,
I have just finished installing and configuring TSM client 5.4.0.0 and TDP
5.4.1.0 for LAN backup.
I got this error message when I initiate TSM/RMAN backup,
Recovery Manager: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Thu Feb 5 12:47:39 2009
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
connected to target database: FCMBTB (DBID=585242614)
RMAN RUN {
2 allocate channel t1 type 'sbt_tape' parms
'ENV=(TDPO_OPTFILE=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt)';
3 allocate channel t2 type 'sbt_tape' parms
'ENV=(TDPO_OPTFILE=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt)';
4
5 backup format 'DF_%d_%s_%p' filesperset 10 (database include current
controlfile);
6
7 sql 'alter system archive log current';
8
9 backup format 'AR_%d_%s_%p' (archivelog all delete input);
10
11 release channel t1;
12 release channel t2;
13 }
14
using target database control file instead of recovery catalog
RMAN-00571: ===
RMAN-00569: === ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===
RMAN-00571: ===
RMAN-03009: failure of allocate command on t1 channel at 02/05/2009 12:47:40
ORA-19554: error allocating device, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name:
ORA-27211: Failed to load Media Management Library
Additional information: 2
Recovery Manager complete.
Please help, what I am getting doing with LAN configuration?
Any pointer to relevant documentations will be appreciated
Thanks
This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If
you are not the addressee, do not disclose, copy, circulate or in any other way
use or rely on the information contained in this email or any attachments. If
received in error, notify the sender immediately and delete this email and any
attachments from your system. Emails cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error
free as the message and any attachments could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
delayed, incomplete or amended. First City Monument Bank Plc and its
subsidiaries do not accept liability for damage caused by this email or any
attachments and may monitor email traffic.
unsubscribe
Please remove me from the list
Re: Can mixed incremental/selective backups be used to consolidate offsite data?
Adrian, Perhaps I am misunderstanding what you are trying to do, but 'move nodedata nodename fromstg=copypool name ...' is legal. I have used it several times. My copypool is on an offsite tape library. Best wishes, Keith Arbogast
Re: TSM TDP LAN backup
Hi,
Try de following:
# rm /usr/lib/libobk.a
# ln -s /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/libobk64.a /usr/lib/libobk.a
# rm /$ORACLE_HOME/lib/libobk.a
# ln -s /usr/lib/libobk.a /$ORACLE_HOME/lib/libobk.a
# ln -f /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/libobk64.a
/usr/lib/libobk.a (cuando sea un oracle 10)
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:22:45 +0100 From: abayomi@firstcitygroup.com
Subject: [ADSM-L] TSM TDP LAN backup To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Kindly
Help, I have just finished installing and configuring TSM client 5.4.0.0 and
TDP 5.4.1.0 for LAN backup. I got this error message when I initiate
TSM/RMAN backup, Recovery Manager: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Thu
Feb 5 12:47:39 2009 Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights
reserved. connected to target database: FCMBTB (DBID=585242614) RMAN
RUN { 2 allocate channel t1 type 'sbt_tape' parms
'ENV=(TDPO_OPTFILE=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt)'; 3
allocate channel t2 type 'sbt_tape' parms
'ENV=(TDPO_OPTFILE=/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64/tdpo.opt)'; 4 5
backup format 'DF_%d_%s_%p' filesperset 10 (database include current
controlfile); 6 7 sql 'alter system archive log current'; 8 9 backup
format 'AR_%d_%s_%p' (archivelog all delete input); 10 11 release channel
t1; 12 release channel t2; 13 } 14 using target database control file
instead of recovery catalog RMAN-00571:
=== RMAN-00569:
=== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS === RMAN-00571:
=== RMAN-03009:
failure of allocate command on t1 channel at 02/05/2009 12:47:40 ORA-19554:
error allocating device, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name: ORA-27211:
Failed to load Media Management Library Additional information: 2
Recovery Manager complete. Please help, what I am getting doing with LAN
configuration? Any pointer to relevant documentations will be appreciated
Thanks This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be
privileged. If you are not the addressee, do not disclose, copy, circulate or
in any other way use or rely on the information contained in this email or
any attachments. If received in error, notify the sender immediately and
delete this email and any attachments from your system. Emails cannot be
guaranteed to be secure or error free as the message and any attachments
could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, delayed, incomplete or amended. First
City Monument Bank Plc and its subsidiaries do not accept liability for
damage caused by this email or any attachments and may monitor email traffic.
_
Consigue gratis el nuevo Messenger. ¡Descárgatelo!
http://download.live.com/
Re: Restore Question
Craig, I recommend you take a look at this flash that went out around end of October last year, to see if it applies: http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21322625 Best regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development Level 3 Team Lead Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/i...@ibmus Internet e-mail: stor...@us.ibm.com IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page: http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 02/04/2009 10:36:38 PM: [image removed] Restore Question Craig Ross to: ADSM-L 02/04/2009 10:37 PM Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager I have an annoying issue. I have never encountered this before. I have 6 files, three the same, all deactivated. TSM client states the files are this large. Which is correct. tsm q backup -ina D:\data\SHARED\Systems Operating Centre\Systems Management C entre\Server Team - Unix\password-safe-db\* SizeBackup DateMgmt Class A/I File ----- --- *9,224 * *B* 09-01-2009 21:37:40 DEFAULT I \\blah\d$\data\SHARED\Systems Operating Centre\Systems Management Centre\Server Team - Unix\Password-Safe-DB\prod_unix.ibak *13,784 * *B* 13-01-2009 21:24:00 DEFAULT I \\blah\d$\data\SHARED\Systems Operating Centre\Systems Management Centre\Server Team - Unix\Password-Safe-DB\prod_unix.ibak * 9,224* *B* 09-01-2009 21:37:40 DEFAULT I \\blah\d$\data\SHARED\Systems Operating Centre\Systems Management Centre\Server Team - Unix\Password-Safe-DB\prod_unix.psafe3 *13,784* *B* 13-01-2009 21:24:00 DEFAULT I \\blah\d$\data\SHARED\Systems Operating Centre\Systems Management Centre\Server Team - Unix\Password-Safe-DB\prod_unix.psafe3 *48* *B* 09-01-2009 21:37:41 DEFAULT I \\blah\d$\data\SHARED\Systems Operating Centre\Systems Management Centre\Server Team - Unix\Password-Safe-DB\prod_unix.psafe3.plk *48* *B* 16-01-2009 22:10:24 DEFAULT I \\blah\d$\data\SHARED\Systems Operating Centre\Systems Management Centre\Server Team - Unix\Password-Safe-DB\prod_unix.psafe3.plk Problem is once the files are restored the files are all either 0 K or 1 KB in size. empty files Restore complete with no error. There are no errors in Act log for the backup run at these times. Has anyone ever seen these behavior before??? Thanks everyone. Craig
Re: syntax question
Thank you Mark, Andy, Wanda, Shawn, and Yudi. Your suggestions are doing the trick. Brett -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:37 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] syntax question I would only condone using this if a different node name is used to back up the .pst files than are used to back up the other files. Do not use INCLUDE/EXCLUDE to accomplish this for a given node. Otherwise when you run the incremental backup that includes the .pst files, they will be backed up (if changed). Then when you run the incremental backup that excludes the .pst files, the existing backup versions will be expired on the TSM server, subjecting them to VERDELETED and RETONLY settings. It is never a good idea to bounce back and forth between including and excluding files like this. If you really need to back the files up in this fashion, you can use separate options files as you describe, but make sure each uses a unique node name. This makes restore slightly more complicated in that you'll need to remember to run the restore for both nodes. A (perhaps) simpler approach would be to just let the other files backup also back up .pst files (if it can), then schedule a separate backup to run later that targets the *.pst files specifically. This type of play is called a punt. :-) Best regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development Level 3 Team Lead Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/i...@ibmus Internet e-mail: stor...@us.ibm.com IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page: http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageMan ager.html The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 02/04/2009 11:36:45 AM: [image removed] Re: syntax question Mark Stapleton to: ADSM-L 02/04/2009 11:37 AM Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Use two option files and point a different scheduler service at each of them. One option file should read: Exclude *:\...\* Include *:\...\*.pst The other should read: Exclude *:\...\*.pst -- Mark Stapleton (mark.staple...@cdw.com) System engineer, CDW Office 763.592.5963 7145 Boone Avenue North, Suite 140 Brooklyn Park MN 55428-1511 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Whitlock, Brett Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 10:30 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] syntax question Hi List, Server TSM 5.4 on Windows Client 5.5 on Windows Here's what I'm trying to do. Run 1 incremental on a file server with all .pst files excluded. Then, run a separate incremental with only the .pst files. I have c: e: and f: drives DescriptionONLY for backing up .PST's on file server ActionINCREMENTAL Options-subdir=yes -include *:\...\*.pst ObjectsC:\*.pst E:\*.pst F:\*.pst sched.log reports: 02/03/2009 23:51:27 ANS1389W Invalid option (-INCLUDE) for the scheduled INCREMENTAL command 02/03/2009 23:51:27 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT BEGIN MMA_DAILY_PST_BACKUP 02/03/2009 23:00:00 02/03/2009 23:51:27 ANS1149E No domain is available for incremental backup. The domain may be empty or all file systems in the domain are excluded. 02/03/2009 23:51:27 ANS5083E Drive specification contains wildcard character. Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks, Brett No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.17/1933 - Release Date: 03-Feb-09 5:48 PM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.17/1933 - Release Date: 03-Feb-09 5:48 PM
Re: OS/390 or z/OS as Tivoli Clients
This client only backs up the Unix Subsystem and not the traditional MVS datasets. You will not be able to get to the DB2 datasets. Regular MVS backup tools does not allow individual file restore from the Unix Subsystem. I have TSM for z/OS, both client and server. The TDP for database (Oracle, SQL) does not have a z/OS version. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Sims Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 4:12 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: OS/390 or z/OS as Tivoli Clients The client that there is is part of z/OS USS. See Technote 1052224 and the Unix client manual. Richard Sims
TSM v6 - article up on SearchStorage
http://searchdatabackup.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid187_gci1346956,00.html - The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.
Re: Re: ISC/Admin Center and Windows 2008
The final answer to this question if anyone is interested is that the ISC for TSM 5.5 (6.x) wont be released for Windows 2008. The ISC for TSM 6.1 will support TSM 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5 on Windows 2008. Really annoying gap in server/GUI OS support but I'm not really surprised. -km On 02/02, Christian Svensson wrote: I have onyl be able to install ISC 7.0 (TSM 6.1) on Windows Server 2008. I'm guessing Windows Server 2008 will only be supported by ISC 7 (TSM 6.1). Have you ask your Tivoli Storage Rep for more information? Best Regards Christian Svensson Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: christian.svens...@cristie.se Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] f#246;r km [...@grogg.org] Skickat: den 2 februari 2009 10:59 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: ISC/Admin Center and Windows 2008 Hello, Is there any word on when the ISC/Admin Center will be supported on Windows 2008? And has anyone been successful in installing the Admin Center on 2008 even though it is not supported? -km
Re: Restore Question
Hi Andy, I am currently at home so I cannot 100% confirm my compression settings, but those symptoms read exactly what I am seeing. Andy thanks for the detail. These kind of 'features' really start to hurt customers. Cheers (I think) Andrew Raibeck wrote: Craig, I recommend you take a look at this flash that went out around end of October last year, to see if it applies: http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21322625 Best regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development Level 3 Team Lead Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/i...@ibmus Internet e-mail: stor...@us.ibm.com IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page: http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 02/04/2009 10:36:38 PM: [image removed] Restore Question Craig Ross to: ADSM-L 02/04/2009 10:37 PM Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager I have an annoying issue. I have never encountered this before. I have 6 files, three the same, all deactivated. TSM client states the files are this large. Which is correct. tsm q backup -ina D:\data\SHARED\Systems Operating Centre\Systems Management C entre\Server Team - Unix\password-safe-db\* SizeBackup DateMgmt Class A/I File ----- --- *9,224 * *B* 09-01-2009 21:37:40 DEFAULT I \\blah\d$\data\SHARED\Systems Operating Centre\Systems Management Centre\Server Team - Unix\Password-Safe-DB\prod_unix.ibak *13,784 * *B* 13-01-2009 21:24:00 DEFAULT I \\blah\d$\data\SHARED\Systems Operating Centre\Systems Management Centre\Server Team - Unix\Password-Safe-DB\prod_unix.ibak * 9,224* *B* 09-01-2009 21:37:40 DEFAULT I \\blah\d$\data\SHARED\Systems Operating Centre\Systems Management Centre\Server Team - Unix\Password-Safe-DB\prod_unix.psafe3 *13,784* *B* 13-01-2009 21:24:00 DEFAULT I \\blah\d$\data\SHARED\Systems Operating Centre\Systems Management Centre\Server Team - Unix\Password-Safe-DB\prod_unix.psafe3 *48* *B* 09-01-2009 21:37:41 DEFAULT I \\blah\d$\data\SHARED\Systems Operating Centre\Systems Management Centre\Server Team - Unix\Password-Safe-DB\prod_unix.psafe3.plk *48* *B* 16-01-2009 22:10:24 DEFAULT I \\blah\d$\data\SHARED\Systems Operating Centre\Systems Management Centre\Server Team - Unix\Password-Safe-DB\prod_unix.psafe3.plk Problem is once the files are restored the files are all either 0 K or 1 KB in size. empty files Restore complete with no error. There are no errors in Act log for the backup run at these times. Has anyone ever seen these behavior before??? Thanks everyone. Craig
Oracle TDP restore performance
All, This is a question similar to one that was recently posted but never quite answered: http://www.mail-archive.com/adsm-l@vm.marist.edu/msg79786.html We have a user who backs up Oracle databases on AIX 5.3 using RMAN and the TDP 5.4 to a TSM 5.3 server. He uses 12 RMAN channels to back up a few hundred GB database to a TSM disk pool in ~1 hour. A restore of the same data takes 7 hours even though the data stays on disk and RMAN is told to use 8 restore channels. A q session on the TSM server during the restore shows only 1 restore session for the node. Our first thought was to increase the ResourceUtilization option on the client and MaxMountPoint option for the node on the TSM server. However, the Linux-UNIX TSM client manual states that If all of the files are on disk, only one session is used. There is no multi-session for a pure disk storage pool restore. Anyone have any hints or tips on how to speed up a pure disk Oracle RMAN/TDP restore? Is the solution that we should flush the db backups to tape in order to be able to make use of ResourceUtilization and MaxMountPoints settings? John Bremer LANS LLC, Tivoli Backup
Re: Can mixed incremental/selective backups be used to consolidate offsite data?
Adrian, We mostly use collocation by group for this issue, but we have upon occasion done as you suggest and have run a selective to consolidate a particular client's data. We have also renamed filespaces which forces a full incremental. When we do this, we include the date (as in \\mynode\c$_20090205) so we can look back after a couple of months and discard the old filespace. Bob. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Davis, Adrian Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 2:58 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Can mixed incremental/selective backups be used to consolidate offsite data? Richard, I'm mainly concerned about the Offsite volumes. We have a small library (IBM 3583) and a limited budget, so I was hoping for a simple work-around to this issue. Never mind - I guess we'll just have to live with it. Best Regards, =Adrian= -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Sims Sent: 04 February 2009 13:05 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Can mixed incremental/selective backups be used to consolidate offsite data? Adrian - The key word collocation does not appear in your question. That's the architectural solution to keeping related data together. Collocation is conventionally used for onsite volumes, but not for offsite volumes, given the substantial tape management complications that would occur with partially filled volumes: offsite volumes are usually not collocated, for that reason - but could be. Richard Sims DISCLAIMER This message is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity it is addressed to. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail. To see the full version of this disclaimer please visit the following address: http://www.lewisham.gov.uk/AboutThisSite/EmailDisclaimer.htm For advice and assistance about online security and protection from internet threats visit the Get Safe Online website at http://www.getsafeonline.org This electronic transmission and any documents accompanying this electronic transmission contain confidential information belonging to the sender. This information may be legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on or regarding the contents of this electronically transmitted information is strictly prohibited.
