Re: AW: [ADSM-L] 6.4 docs
It's available ! 2012/11/27 Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl 24 hours, not 24 minutes... be more patient :) On 27 nov. 2012, at 16:34, Dolinski, Peter S dolin...@u.washington.edu wrote: I don't see any TSM6.4 folder there. Regards, Peter (206) 616-0787 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Angela Robertson Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 6:56 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] 6.4 docs The TSM 6.4 information center has been packaged and sent for posting to the following site: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/techprev/infocenter/ I was told that it should be available in the next 24 hours. I'll check the site throughout the day to ensure the package is posted. Angela Angela Robertson IBM Software Group, Tivoli Software Durham, NC 27703 aprob...@us.ibm.com “We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.” - Aristotle ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu wrote on 11/21/2012 04:18:10 PM: J. Pohlmann jpohlm...@shaw.ca Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu 11/21/2012 04:18 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu To ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, cc Subject Re: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] 6.4 docs A request to development - could someone please package the TSM 6.4 Infocenter into a downloadable package and put in the techprev directory on the ftp site along with the other downoadable Infocenters. Thanks. Regards, Joerg Pohlmann -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Angela Robertson Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 06:40 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] 6.4 docs The 6.4 Info Center is available: http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6r4/index.jsp The ibm.com team has been contacted and the problem should not happen again. That said, if the problem persists, thanks for your patience. No one wants the site down... Angela Angela Robertson IBM Software Group, Tivoli Software Durham, NC 27703 aprob...@us.ibm.com “We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit.” - Aristotle ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu wrote on 11/20/2012 03:33:15 AM: Rainer Holzinger rainerholzin...@gmx.de Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu 11/20/2012 03:33 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu To ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, cc Subject [ADSM-L] AW: [ADSM-L] 6.4 docs Hi Andy, for me the 6.4 Info Center is still not working. Following the link still results in service temporarily unavailable. Best regards, Rainer -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] Im Auftrag von Andrew Raibeck Gesendet: Montag, 19. November 2012 20:37 An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Betreff: Re: [ADSM-L] 6.4 docs 6.4 Info Center is back up. Best regards, Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development Level 3 Team Lead Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Hartford/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: stor...@us.ibm.com IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page: http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Stor age_Manager ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu wrote on 2012-11-19 11:30:47: From: Stefan Folkerts stefan.folke...@gmail.com To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, Date: 2012-11-19 11:34 Subject: Re: 6.4 docs Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Simon is the man of the day for me! :-D On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Erwann Simon erwann.si...@free.fr wrote: Hi all, It's not working for me either. Here's a dropbox link to the new publications (.pdf): http://db.tt/LWQajxwi You'll also find a quick review of the new functions. Regards, Erwann Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl a écrit : Hi all, anyone getting something useful from http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6r4 ? -- Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté. = -- Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl +31 6 248 21 622
Re: Strange dirmc
Robert, This latest information makes me wonder: What exactly is making you think that directories are not being bound to the correct management class? So far, we have not changed anything; but we have demonstrated that TSM is indeed binding directories correctly to MGLAW. Notes: 1. With regard to data placement, the management class specifies the storage pool for the initial data placement. That is, when the object is backed up, TSM attempts to store it in the storage pool specified by the DESTINATION (note: if the destination storage pool is full, or if the object exceeds the maximum object size for the destination, or if the storage pool is not enabled for write access, then TSM will attempt to store the object in a successor pool based on NEXTSTGPOOL setting). TSM server processes such as migration or MOVE DATA can cause the objects to be put into a different storage pool. 2. When objects are rebound to a different management class, no data movement occurs. For example, if the object is stored in storage pool A,rebinding the object to a management class with DESTINATION of storage pool B does not cause the object to move to storage pool B. However, as mentioned in (1) above, TSM will store *new* objects in storage pool B. 3. Rebinding occurs when you perform incremental backup on the file system that contains the objects. For example, if an object in file system /fs1 is bound to management class MGA, then changing the management class for that object does not cause an instantaneous rebinding. Rather, the rebinding occurs the next time you back up /fs1. And as mentioned above, there is no data movement for existing objects to the new destination. So going back to my question: what is making you think the objects are not being rebound to MGLAW? If you are performing incremental backups of the file systems in question, then you can use dsmc query backup with the -dirsonly option to see which management class the directories are bound to, as you did for the test case. If you are simply looking at the storage pool where the directories are stored, then this alone is not an indicator of incorrect binding. Best regards, Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development Level 3 Team Lead Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Hartford/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: stor...@us.ibm.com IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page: http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu wrote on 2012-11-28 01:05:42: From: Robert Ouzen rou...@univ.haifa.ac.il To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu, Date: 2012-11-28 01:34 Subject: Re: Strange dirmc Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Andy , Here some results of the suggestions you made: dsmc q mg -detail MgmtClass Name : MGLAW Description : Space Management Technique : None Auto Migrate on Non-Usage : 0 Backup Required Before Migration: NO Destination for Migrated Files : DD_LAW Copy Group Copy Group Name: STANDARD Copy Type..: Backup Copy Frequency.: 0 day(s) Versions Data Exists...: 7 version(s) Versions Data Deleted..: 1 version(s) Retain Extra Versions..: No Limit Retain Only Version: 120 day(s) Copy Serialization.: Dynamic Copy Mode..: Modified Copy Destination...: DD_LAW Create a new directory and run on it an incremental backup: tsm i /home/robert/test/ -su=yes Incremental backup of volume '/home/robert/test/' Successful incremental backup of '/home/robert/test/*' Total number of objects inspected:2 Total number of objects backed up:0 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 0 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of bytes transferred: 0 B Data transfer time:0.00 sec Network data transfer rate:0.00 KB/sec Aggregate data transfer rate: 0.00 KB/sec Objects compressed by:0% Elapsed processing time: 00:00:03 tsm q ba /home/robert/test -dirsonly SizeBackup DateMgmt Class A/I File ----- --- 128 B 11/28/12 07:45:40 MGLAW A /home/robert/test Nothing wrong in the dsmerror.log I before this test I run a mode nodedata lawsrv from=dd_education to=dd_law to have a clean environment. After the backup I run a new q nodedata lawsrv and result correct , storage pool taken DD_LAW tsm: POSTBACKq nodedata lawsrv Node NameVolume NameStorage Pool Physical
Re: Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression
I think q actlog begindate=today-ndays msgno=4968 is more efficient. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Prather, Wanda Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:18 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression For compression: q actlog begindate=today-ndays search=ane4968 Non-zero values mean the client is compressing. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Harris, Chad Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:04 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression Fellow TSM Admins, We are in the process of bringing VTLs into our TSM Environment. In order to take full advantage of deduplication features on the VTL we need to go after the clients that are performing client based encryption and compression. With that in mind, does anyone know an easy way to tell which clients are using these features? Thanks, Chad Harris
Client 6.4 installation causing Win Server 2012 to restart?
Hello all, I started the installation of TSM Client version 6.4 on one of our new Windows Server 2012 servers and went to do other things while waiting on the installation to finish. When I went back to the server after about ~5 minutes I realized that the TSM Client installation hade restarted the machine, without installing the client yet, causing angry phonecalls from concerned users. I figure that the installation of the prerequisite Microsoft packages is the reason behind this? Has anyone here experienced this before? I've searched through various installation notes from TSM regarding the 6.4 client but I havent really found anything indicating this. I have installed 5 or 6 clients on other Windows Server 2012 machines and numerous of older TSM clients on other servers without experiencing this before. The concerned server is used as an TS-server. +-- |This was sent by jakob.g...@jsc.se via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +--
Re: Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression
You could start by getting a list of nodes that are set to either COMPRESSION=CLIENT or YES and those with DEDUPLICATION=CLIENTORSERVER. The default is SERVERONLY. Those would be good candidates to start with. You can't do client-side dedup without setting the node attribute. Bill When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is NOT your friend! - USMC -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ehresman,David E. Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 9:53 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression I think q actlog begindate=today-ndays msgno=4968 is more efficient. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Prather, Wanda Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:18 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression For compression: q actlog begindate=today-ndays search=ane4968 Non-zero values mean the client is compressing. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Harris, Chad Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:04 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression Fellow TSM Admins, We are in the process of bringing VTLs into our TSM Environment. In order to take full advantage of deduplication features on the VTL we need to go after the clients that are performing client based encryption and compression. With that in mind, does anyone know an easy way to tell which clients are using these features? Thanks, Chad Harris
Re: netezza nzbackup connector for TSM
Thanks for all the replies. The PVU table for this appliance is at this URL, but it does not describe which client is needed. I finally received an IBM verified answer on this: only need the TSM BA client; no need for the TSM for DB product. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/lotus/passportadvantage/IBM_Netezza_Appliance_licensing.html Mahesh From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] on behalf of Prather, Wanda [wanda.prat...@icfi.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 14:42 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] netezza nzbackup connector for TSM There is a TSM for Data Bases/Oracle and a TSM for Data Bases/MSSQL. If you aren't installing that code (because you don't have either Oracle or SQL), I don't' see why you would need a license? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tailor, Mahesh C. Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 10:07 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] netezza nzbackup connector for TSM What I have been told by the IBM partner is that in addition to the TSM connector that is built into the product, we would need to purchase licenses for the other products -- BA client and TSM for DB. Yes, of the two TSM for DB is the majority of the cost. I also questioned the need for the TSM for DB client as there is no standard -- Oracle, DB2, etc. -- database on the Netezza and have not received a definitive answer. Thanks. Mahesh From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] on behalf of Tim Brown [tbr...@cenhud.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 08:44 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] netezza nzbackup connector for TSM Is the TSM for DB Client you refer to the Connector. So far I prefer just native TSM with nzbackups. With the 6 figure price tag, is the TSM for DB Client that you refer to the greatest $ amt of the 2. Thanks, Tim -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tailor, Mahesh C. Sent: Monday, 26 November, 2012 5:14 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: netezza nzbackup connector for TSM Hello. On a similar thread: we are in the process of acquiring Netezza and will need to back it up to TSM. We were told of the TSM Connector. In trying to make sure we are in TSM license compliance, we were told that we would need to license both the TSM for BA client and the TSM for DB client. If we were to license both TSM products, we are looking at cost in the six-figures. Can someone please advise as to how the TSM licensing works for this product? Thanks in advance. Mahesh From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] on behalf of Tim Brown [tbr...@cenhud.com] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:34 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] netezza nzbackup connector for TSM I am attempting to get the netezza backup utility working with tsm. They have a connector that allows backing up netezza backups directly into tsm. Has anyone tried this and got it to work. ./nzbackup -u user -pw psw -db TDS -connector tivioli -connectorArgs TSM_PASSWORD=x Error: unable to connect to host 'localhost', port '5483' - Connection refused. Thanks, Tim Brown Supervisor Computer Operations Central Hudson Gas Electric 284 South Ave Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 Email: tbr...@cenhud.commailto:tbr...@cenhud.com mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com Phone: 845-486-5643 Fax: 845-486-5921 Cell: 845-235-4255 This message contains confidential information and is only for the intended recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this note and deleting all copies and attachments. Notice: The information and attachment(s) contained in this communication are intended for the addressee only, and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately, and delete this communication from any computer or network system. Any interception, review, printing, copying, re-transmission, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited by law and may subject them to criminal or civil liability. Carilion Clinic shall not be liable for the improper and/or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication or for any delay in its receipt. Notice: The information and attachment(s) contained in this communication are intended for the addressee only, and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this communication in error, please
DR scenario
Anyone doing non-TSM replication to their DR site, e.g. ProcTier IP replication? If so, I would be interested in talking to you about how you do DR recovery, especially how you sync up what tapes got replicated vs what your recovered TSM DB knows. David Ehresman University of Louisville deehr...@louisville.edumailto:deehr...@louisville.edu
Re: Client 6.4 installation causing Win Server 2012 to restart?
I had heard that a late 6.3 version client would force a reboot, apparently following the prerequisite MS packages. A co-worker had installed 6.3.x on a file server (Win Server 2008) and didn't know it was going to boot while he went for a coffee refill during the install. He had several calls from staff that got clobbered due to the reboot. But, this morning I installed the 6.4.0 client without any reboot on Win Server 2008. The client installer DID install the Microsoft packages. The machine happens to also have TSM Monitoring/Admin 6.3.1 installed. Perhaps the Microsoft packages were already there, and updated, which maybe doesn't force a reboot??? Harold Vandeventer Systems Programmer State of Kansas - Office of Information Technology Services harold.vandeven...@ks.gov (785) 296-0631 -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of RonHextall Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 4:57 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Client 6.4 installation causing Win Server 2012 to restart? Hello all, I started the installation of TSM Client version 6.4 on one of our new Windows Server 2012 servers and went to do other things while waiting on the installation to finish. When I went back to the server after about ~5 minutes I realized that the TSM Client installation hade restarted the machine, without installing the client yet, causing angry phonecalls from concerned users. I figure that the installation of the prerequisite Microsoft packages is the reason behind this? Has anyone here experienced this before? I've searched through various installation notes from TSM regarding the 6.4 client but I havent really found anything indicating this. I have installed 5 or 6 clients on other Windows Server 2012 machines and numerous of older TSM clients on other servers without experiencing this before. The concerned server is used as an TS-server. +-- |This was sent by jakob.g...@jsc.se via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-- [Confidentiality notice:] *** This e-mail message, including attachments, if any, is intended for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, or disclosure is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original message, including all copies, Thank you. ***
Re: Client 6.4 installation causing Win Server 2012 to restart?
I have had reboot requests when upgrading Windows servers. I circumvent them by copying dscenu.txt from the install directory to the baclient directory. Jim Schneider -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Maurice van 't Loo Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 2:23 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Client 6.4 installation causing Win Server 2012 to restart? Also 6.3 clients can cause a reboot during installation. I'm not sure why. I see it with approx. 1 of 10 installs where the prerequisite needs to be installed om servers who are in use. Never seen the reboot on new and clean windows installs, so I assume it has something to do with other software icw the prerequisites. Regards, Maurice van 't Loo http://mvantloo.nl Op 28 nov. 2012 18:51 schreef RonHextall tsm-fo...@backupcentral.com het volgende: Hello all, I started the installation of TSM Client version 6.4 on one of our new Windows Server 2012 servers and went to do other things while waiting on the installation to finish. When I went back to the server after about ~5 minutes I realized that the TSM Client installation hade restarted the machine, without installing the client yet, causing angry phonecalls from concerned users. I figure that the installation of the prerequisite Microsoft packages is the reason behind this? Has anyone here experienced this before? I've searched through various installation notes from TSM regarding the 6.4 client but I havent really found anything indicating this. I have installed 5 or 6 clients on other Windows Server 2012 machines and numerous of older TSM clients on other servers without experiencing this before. The concerned server is used as an TS-server. +- +- |This was sent by jakob.g...@jsc.se via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +- +- ** Information contained in this e-mail message and in any attachments thereto is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message, delete any copies held on your systems, notify the sender immediately, and refrain from using or disclosing all or any part of its content to any other person.
Re: Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression
Thank you all for your sage advice. I am able to find the servers that are using compression, unfortunately though, some of my client Admins have let it slip that they are not always using compression when they are setting up encryption, despite our best efforts to guide them that way. Anyone else know a way to find nodes only performing client encryption? Thanks again, Chad -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Boyer Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:01 PM To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression You could start by getting a list of nodes that are set to either COMPRESSION=CLIENT or YES and those with DEDUPLICATION=CLIENTORSERVER. The default is SERVERONLY. Those would be good candidates to start with. You can't do client-side dedup without setting the node attribute. Bill When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is NOT your friend! - USMC -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ehresman,David E. Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 9:53 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression I think q actlog begindate=today-ndays msgno=4968 is more efficient. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Prather, Wanda Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:18 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression For compression: q actlog begindate=today-ndays search=ane4968 Non-zero values mean the client is compressing. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Harris, Chad Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:04 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression Fellow TSM Admins, We are in the process of bringing VTLs into our TSM Environment. In order to take full advantage of deduplication features on the VTL we need to go after the clients that are performing client based encryption and compression. With that in mind, does anyone know an easy way to tell which clients are using these features? Thanks, Chad Harris
Re: Client 6.4 installation causing Win Server 2012 to restart?
Also 6.3 clients can cause a reboot during installation. I'm not sure why. I see it with approx. 1 of 10 installs where the prerequisite needs to be installed om servers who are in use. Never seen the reboot on new and clean windows installs, so I assume it has something to do with other software icw the prerequisites. Regards, Maurice van 't Loo http://mvantloo.nl Op 28 nov. 2012 18:51 schreef RonHextall tsm-fo...@backupcentral.com het volgende: Hello all, I started the installation of TSM Client version 6.4 on one of our new Windows Server 2012 servers and went to do other things while waiting on the installation to finish. When I went back to the server after about ~5 minutes I realized that the TSM Client installation hade restarted the machine, without installing the client yet, causing angry phonecalls from concerned users. I figure that the installation of the prerequisite Microsoft packages is the reason behind this? Has anyone here experienced this before? I've searched through various installation notes from TSM regarding the 6.4 client but I havent really found anything indicating this. I have installed 5 or 6 clients on other Windows Server 2012 machines and numerous of older TSM clients on other servers without experiencing this before. The concerned server is used as an TS-server. +-- |This was sent by jakob.g...@jsc.se via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +--
Re: Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression
I am not aware of any way to detect client based encryption via a server-based query. However, you can see this from a client-side CLI query (DSMC Q BACKUP), so there must be information somewhere that reflects this. For anyone considering SUR pricing (capacity-based), you might consider looking at TSM-based deduplication instead of VTL-based deduplication, as your TB license requirements will be lower. Or at least, that's what I was told by an IBMer describing the SUR pricing model to me. Granted, you would need a more powerful TSM server, but you could offset that cost by purchasing disk less expensively than a VTL vendor would charge. ..Paul At 04:13 PM 11/28/2012, Harris, Chad wrote: Thank you all for your sage advice. I am able to find the servers that are using compression, unfortunately though, some of my client Admins have let it slip that they are not always using compression when they are setting up encryption, despite our best efforts to guide them that way. Anyone else know a way to find nodes only performing client encryption? Thanks again, Chad -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Boyer Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:01 PM To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression You could start by getting a list of nodes that are set to either COMPRESSION=CLIENT or YES and those with DEDUPLICATION=CLIENTORSERVER. The default is SERVERONLY. Those would be good candidates to start with. You can't do client-side dedup without setting the node attribute. Bill When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is NOT your friend! - USMC -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Ehresman,David E. Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 9:53 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression I think q actlog begindate=today-ndays msgno=4968 is more efficient. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Prather, Wanda Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:18 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression For compression: q actlog begindate=today-ndays search=ane4968 Non-zero values mean the client is compressing. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Harris, Chad Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:04 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Who is performing Client Based Encryption and Compression Fellow TSM Admins, We are in the process of bringing VTLs into our TSM Environment. In order to take full advantage of deduplication features on the VTL we need to go after the clients that are performing client based encryption and compression. With that in mind, does anyone know an easy way to tell which clients are using these features? Thanks, Chad Harris -- Paul ZarnowskiPh: 607-255-4757 CIT Infrastructure / Storage Services Fx: 607-255-8521 719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801Em: p...@cornell.edu
Re: DR scenario
Hi, David. You can create a replication statistics file from the PTManager Replication menu. Open that with Open/ApacheOpen/LibreOffice Calc, and compare source time for last sync point against the last_write_date from the VOLUMES table in TSM. Any volumes with last_write_date later than the last sync point require audit vol fix=yes. Did that cover what you needed? On 11/28/2012 11:58 AM, Ehresman,David E. wrote: Anyone doing non-TSM replication to their DR site, e.g. ProcTier IP replication? If so, I would be interested in talking to you about how you do DR recovery, especially how you sync up what tapes got replicated vs what your recovered TSM DB knows. David Ehresman University of Louisville deehr...@louisville.edumailto:deehr...@louisville.edu
