Unsubscribe
SIGN-OFF ADSM-L ___ If you received this email in error, please advise the sender (by return email or otherwise) immediately. You have consented to receive the attached electronically at the above-noted email address; please retain a copy of this confirmation for future reference. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. Vous avez accepté de recevoir le(s) document(s) ci-joint(s) par voie électronique à l'adresse courriel indiquée ci-dessus; veuillez conserver une copie de cette confirmation pour les fins de reference future.
Re: Ideal storage solution for SP and SP+ ???
We use IBM Cloud Object Storage boxes for our backend Spectrum storage...have eliminated all requirements for physical tape devices... -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Rick Adamson Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 5:31 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Ideal storage solution for SP and SP+ ??? What storage solution is at the top of your list for Spectrum Protect and Spectrum Protect Plus? I am a former a Data Domain abuser who (regretfully) moved to EMC Isilon and now looking for the best possible replacement. Usable storage requirement of somewhere in the neighborhood of 500+ tb. Operation protects roughly 2,100 clients. About 75% VMware VMs and SQL with a scattering of AIX hosting DB2 & Oracle. Currently primarily protected using Spectrum Protect servers using BA, TDP, and SP4VE but looking to migrate all possible operations to Spectrum Protect Plus. At this time the plan would be to retain only the most recent (active) data at our production facility on high performing storage to provide quick recovery then using replicate inactive data to our DR facility to be offloaded to Spectrum Protect servers and/or cloud. All feedback and advice welcome. Thanks ! **CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE** This electronic message contains information from Southeastern Grocers, Inc and is intended only for the use of the addressee. This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable Law. This message may not be read, used, distributed, forwarded, reproduced or stored by any other than the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete and notify the sender. ___ If you received this email in error, please advise the sender (by return email or otherwise) immediately. You have consented to receive the attached electronically at the above-noted email address; please retain a copy of this confirmation for future reference. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. Vous avez accepté de recevoir le(s) document(s) ci-joint(s) par voie électronique à l'adresse courriel indiquée ci-dessus; veuillez conserver une copie de cette confirmation pour les fins de reference future.
ISC in french
Is there anyone out there that can send me a screen shot of the isc in French?? Thanks Rob Burton | Technical Lead, Backup Recovery and Open Tape | Royal Bank of Canada | T. 416-348-3849 robert.bur...@rbc.com ___ This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier électronique est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.
Re: The BACKUP VM command is not supported on this client (ANS1184W)
My understanding is you have to be at tsm server 5.5 level as well as the client ... thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 ( 416-348-3849 ) + [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bell, Charles (Chip) Sent: 2008, March, 21 11:09 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: The BACKUP VM command is not supported on this client (ANS1184W) Receiving this error when first testing TSM backups with VMware's VCB product. Running TSM v5.5.0.4 client on Windows 64-bit OS. TSM server is at v5.4.2.0. I have a ticket open with TSM support, but would like to know if anyone has seen this. I thought that command would be supported by 5.5 on 64-bit. What am I missing. Any VMware gurus out there? J God bless you!!! Chip Bell Network Engineer I IBM Tivoli Certified Deployment Professional Baptist Health System Birmingham, AL - Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named in the address. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this information in error, please notify the sender and delete this information from your computer and retain no copies of any of this information. ___ This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier électronique est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.
Re: The BACKUP VM command is not supported on this client (ANS1184W)
I'm not sure .. I was told this by my IBM technical rep ... thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 ( 416-348-3849 ) + [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bell, Charles (Chip) Sent: 2008, March, 21 12:13 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: The BACKUP VM command is not supported on this client (ANS1184W) Is that documented? -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Burton, Robert Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 10:53 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] The BACKUP VM command is not supported on this client (ANS1184W) My understanding is you have to be at tsm server 5.5 level as well as the client ... thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 ( 416-348-3849 ) + [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bell, Charles (Chip) Sent: 2008, March, 21 11:09 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: The BACKUP VM command is not supported on this client (ANS1184W) Receiving this error when first testing TSM backups with VMware's VCB product. Running TSM v5.5.0.4 client on Windows 64-bit OS. TSM server is at v5.4.2.0. I have a ticket open with TSM support, but would like to know if anyone has seen this. I thought that command would be supported by 5.5 on 64-bit. What am I missing. Any VMware gurus out there? J God bless you!!! Chip Bell Network Engineer I IBM Tivoli Certified Deployment Professional Baptist Health System Birmingham, AL - Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named in the address. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this information in error, please notify the sender and delete this information from your computer and retain no copies of any of this information. ___ This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier électronique est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen. ___ This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier électronique est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.
Tandem and TSM
We are backing up our tandem systems ... You require a third party product for the tandem system ... I've included some doc ... BACKHOME/TSM Tivoli Storage Manager for Tandem Advances in data storage hardware and data management software have made centralized storage management a reality. Network backbones now connect distributed systems with channel level performance, allowing server-based applications to deliver functions and services previously dispersed upon individual client systems. ETI-NET has developed a family of connectivity solutions that capitalize on cross-platform opportunities. For over a decade ETI-NET has been providing Tandem users with high quality, easy to use products, which merge Tandem/HP benefits with those from IBM and Microsoft. BackHome is a Tandem application that automates the transfer of backup and restore activity across network facilities into non- Tandem storage servers. The Client API for Tivoli Storage Manager, running in the Tandem, links Tandem to Tivoli server software running in UNIX, Windows NT, MVS, or other popular server environments. BackHome/TSM also supports TM/MP tape services, such as audit tape creation and online dump activity. The functionality of BackHome has been evolving since 1988, when ETI-NET first provided support for IBM MVS tape creation across multiplexed 9600 bps communications lines. Today, using TCP/IP or APPC, connections of 100 Mbps and greater are normal and BackHome TSM performance makes network attachments transparent. Users will appreciate the array of storage devices supported by Tivoli Storage Manager server, and the cost-effectiveness of sharing robotic tape subsystems with other Tandem or non- Tandem platforms. Disaster recovery procedures also benefit from the centralized administration that is adopted with Tivoli Storage Manager. BACKHOME/TSM BACKUP/RESTORE BackHome allows bi-directional transfer of backup or restore objects to and from the server. Transfer integrity is controlled by integrated modules in the API. High throughput and high line utilization are achieved through data compression, advanced I/O buffering techniques and parallelism. CATALOG Information about files can be stored in an ETI-NET-provided catalog at backup time. Commands are available through the BFSINT (BackHome User Interface) for locating and updating information in the catalog. This provides significant improvements in BackHome ease of use. FAST RESTORE Fast Restore minimizes the amount of data needing to transit the network during restores. At backup time a catalog entry is created for each file, and a BackupID and Position Number is recorded. At restore time, the user builds the restore request, the Position Number is retrieved from the catalog on Tandem and passed to the server holding the backup set. The server starts transmitting the files to restore from the Position Number, bypassing unnecessary files. CHECKPOINT RESTART BackHome provides the capability to process a backup as multiple transactions, where each transaction can be 'committed' in the form of a checkpoint. The Tivoli server provides roll-back processing to the last checkpoint when the in-process transaction fails. TSM API The Tivoli TSM API on Tandem NSK operates at D43 or higher, and supports connection to every Tivoli Storage Manager server. ETI-NET provides testing modules to allow the TSM API-to-TSM server conversation to be diagnosed independently of BackHome. EVENT LOGGING Logging of all activity is written to dual alternating log files. Users may interactively access these event messages through the BackHome interactive user interface or they can be sent to the Tandem EMS system. TSM stored objects and back-up sets can also be reviewed through TSM API commands on Tandem. BENEFITS * Standardizes Tandem within enterprise-wide storage management approach. * Allows access to best cost/performing storage media and subsystems available industry wide. * Improves utilization of storage by sharing resources. * Simplifies disaster recovery planning. * Normalizes tape media for improved archiving and vaulting. * Reduces tape quantity through advanced reclamation techniques. INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE Installation is easy. The system can be operational within less than four hours. Training and onsite support is available. Maintenance support and product updates are provided as part of a standard license agreement with each product installation. FEATURES BACKHOME/TSM * Non-disruptive installation * Interactive, batch, and programmatic interfaces * Conditional completion cascading * Auto Restart * Optional TMF support * Selectable data compression * Compatibility with job schedulers and security systems * Satisfied customers TSM API * Version 2.1 or Higher * Supports all API verbs * TCP/IP or APPC * Servernet * UNIX-like set-up * Independent test modules * Open or closed registration *
Re: Antwort: Re: [ADSM-L] tdpo SBT error = 7011, errno = 2230
When installing tdp for oracle, there is a library link required you can find this in the install manual Eg . ln -s /usr/lib/pa20_64/libobk.sl $ORACLE_HOME/lib/libobk.sl This may be your problem thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 ( 416-348-3849 ) + [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axel Kiessig Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 9:59 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Antwort: Re: [ADSM-L] tdpo SBT error = 7011, errno = 2230 hi, thanks for all the hints! I reduced the error to an ora-27211 so far... 27211, 0, Failed to load Media Management Library // *Cause: User-supplied SBT_LIBRARY or libobk.so could not be loaded. Call // to dlopen for media library returned error. See Additional // information for error code. // *Action: Retry the command with proper media library. Or re-install // Media management module for Oracle. I keep working on this now Has anyone experience with tdpo - ora-27211? regards Axel Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 27.10.2005 13:38 Bitte antworten an ADSM: Dist Stor Manager An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Kopie: Thema: Re: [ADSM-L] tdpo SBT error = 7011, errno = 2230 Axel - The TSM API is the media manager layer for this Oracle DB interface, and the errno can be expected to be a TSM API error number, as documented in its manual. 2230 tells of the alleged dsm.sys file not being present, or the inclexcl file pointed to by it. I would check environment variables. If you also have the standard B/A client in place, do 'dsmc q opt' and 'dsmc q inclexcl' to assure that it can access those files as a basis: the TDP may use those, or its own files, as per environment variables. Richard Sims On Oct 27, 2005, at 2:09 AM, Axel Kiessig wrote: hi, I'm trying to set up tape backup for oracle db server via tdpo. installing tdpo and setting up the passwordfile is successfull. testing to write data to tsm fails with RMAN-03009: failure of allocate command on ch1 channel at 10/27/2005 08:03:09 ORA-19554: error allocating device, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name: ORA-27000: skgfqsbi: failed to initialize storage subsystem (SBT) layer SVR4 Error: 2230: Unknown error Additional information: 7011 ORA-19511: Error received from media manager layer, error text: SBT error = 7011, errno = 2230, sbtopen: system error has anyone experience in fixing that...? exists an overview for all the different 'errno'? regards Axel ___ This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier électronique est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.
TSM Reclamation and large tape formats
We are being pushed to improve our reclamation thresholds in order to drive down the amount of tape volsers required... We are using STK 9940 tape drives and get 300GB - 1 TB of data stored on each tape. I'm trying to explain that with the larger tape sizes it is much more difficult to keep the reclamation numbers at the same target levels as with the smaller tape volumes. We have 2 tsm servers / 50 lan-free clients / approx 2 TB of disk pool and we backup 8 TB nightly... Between copypool and migration we have limited reclamation cycles... Just inquiring on what the rest of the tsm community is experiencing in regards to tsm reclamation with large tape... thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 ( 416-348-3849 ) + [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier électronique est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.
Re: Backing up Laptops with TSM ?
have a look at Vitalfile Real-Time On-Line Data Protection -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of goc Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 10:35 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Backing up Laptops with TSM ? hi all, i wonder if anyone is doing such a nice work if yes can you tell me in few sentences how and is there any special thing to consider, thank you very much. goran This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier électronique est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.
Re: TSM 5.2.3.0 upgrade : reclamation problems
double check and make sure none of the primary tapes required for the reclamation are in an unavailable or destroyed status .. thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 ( 416-348-3849 ) + [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Post, J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 10:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM 5.2.3.0 upgrade : reclamation problems Does this look familiar to anyone ? After upgrading the TSM server (WIN2K,SP4) from 5.2.2.2 to 5.2.3.0 the reclamation for our COPYPOOL_COLL reports unreadable files, sometimes even before it has accessed any tapes (see log message below). 203 Space ReclamationOffsite Volume(s) (storage pool COPYPOOL_COLL), Moved Files: 2336025, Moved Bytes: 489,968,253,- 125, Unreadable Files: 107, Unreadable Bytes: 0. Current Physical File (bytes): 24,781,030 Curre- nt input volume: BP5079L2. Current output volume: BP5013L2. Auditing the corresponding tapes and the corresponding disc volume did not result in any errors. As I am rather unhappy with the current situation all input/advise and tips are welcome. Best regards, Jacob Post, [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier ilectronique est confidentiel et protigi. L'expiditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) disigni(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier ilectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immidiatement, par retour de courrier ilectronique ou par un autre moyen.
Re: NAS device as a primary stg pool
I've used netapp nas as primary diskpool in the past...performance was good...depends on your network set-up ...I had a GIGE connectionTsm could not tell the difference between network mounted and fibre connected disk in functionality... The only problem I encountered was I forgot to turn off the snapshot feature...so inturn I filled up my nas volume... other than that all worked well... thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 ( 416-348-3849 ) + [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Mark Blunden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAS device as a primary stg pool Hello all, I have searched the archives, but have not found anything specific on this subject. I have seen some appends regarding copy stg pools, but not primary. I am after some information from anyone has has used, or who knows anyone who has used, a NAS device as a primary storage pool. I am especially interested in the windows platform implementation, but any platform comments will be welcomed. I know there are some implications, but would like to hear ANY comments, or opinions. I am interested in issues relating to: performance 'user' connection vs 'system or service' connection IP (NAS) vs SCSI (local disk) issues permissions useability or anything else applicable... Note - I am only talking about stg pools, not database or log allocations. Thank you for any help you can give me on this. regards, Mark This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier ilectronique est confidentiel et protigi. L'expiditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) disigni(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier ilectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immidiatement, par retour de courrier ilectronique ou par un autre moyen.
Re: not pre-empted by higher priority operation
Is the restore and the migration use the same devclass. The restore operation will only pre-empt a process / session with the same devclass as it is assigned thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-3849 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Debi Randolph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 5:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: not preempted by higher priority operation Hi List ... Has this ever happened to you? I have only two tape drives, so they pretty much run non-stop. But when someone goes in to do a restore, whatever is running gets preempted and the restore gets completed as a priority. But sometimes.for some reason..TSM does not preempt whatever is running and the restore just sits there and never runs. It happened to us this morning. Both tape drives were migrating data, so nothing with a seriously high priority.Neither drive was writing out any seriously large file or seriously large client, we co-locate and were mounting tapes left and right, we were down to the last few clients. The restore sat there for more than an hour in a Tape Wait state. The customer finally killed the restore. When I restarted it later, it ran without issue, at that time we were doing reclamation with both drives. Server is Windows 2000 Server is SP3 TSM Server 5.1.7.0 TSM Client 5.1.5.0 (Windows 2000) IBM 3494 library IBM 3590 E1A drives This isn't the first time this has happened, and it doesn't happen all the time. I usually get impatient and kill whatever is running so that a tape drive becomes available. Whenever this happens, we don't get the preempted message in the activity log. ANR1440I All drives in use. Process 237 being preempted by higher priority operation. Can anyone explain why this would happen? Thanks, Deb Randolph ***N O T I C E*** The information contained in this e-mail, and in any accompanying documents, may constitute confidential and/or legally privileged information. The information is intended only for use by the designated recipient. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for the delivery of the message to the intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message from your system. *** This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier ilectronique est confidentiel et protigi. L'expiditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) disigni(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier ilectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immidiatement, par retour de courrier ilectronique ou par un autre moyen.
Re: STORAGNT not working, any suggestions?
This has happened to me in the past, when I incorrectly entered the dsmsta setstorageserver command incorrectly. In my case any traffic from the client node to the tsm server would get the same message (not only the storageagent also the ba client) I had to recycle the tsm server to free up whatever got hosed up on the tcpip side of things. Then delete the storage agent and server entries in the devconfig file and re-enter the dsmsta setstorageserver command again... thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-3849 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Joni Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: STORAGNT not working, any suggestions? Hello again everyone! Right now we have another TPOC going that is working with a 3584 LTO2 library with 2 drives so that we can test LAN-free. (Our previous 2 tests with 9840B and 3590E were not true LAN-free tests because we only had one drive and a manual library) Right now we are having problems with the storagnt configuration. We are seeing the following messages. The individuals working on this would just like to know if anyone has any suggestions/comments. Also, if anyone would be willing to send us your dsm.sys file on the client, dsmsta.opt file on the storagnt, and anything else that may pertain to this setup we would greatly appreciate it! Thank you in advance!! ANR7800I DSMSERV generated at 15:37:52 on Feb 10 2003. ANR7801I Subsystem process ID is 5441. ANR8200I TCP/IP driver ready for connection with clients on port 1500. ANR8209E Unable to establish TCP/IP session with 157.154.43.104 - connection refused. ANR0454E Session rejected by server SERVER1, reason: Communication Failure. ANR3602E Unable to communicate with database server. ANR8209E Unable to establish TCP/IP session with 157.154.43.104 - connection refused. ANR0454E Session rejected by server SERVER1, reason: Communication Failure. ANRD smtb.c(5575): ThreadId0 Error Beginning Storage Service Cancel Session transaction. ANR3602E Unable to communicate with database server. TSM:STORAGENT Joni Moyer Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (717)975-8338 This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier ilectronique est confidentiel et protigi. L'expiditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) disigni(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier ilectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immidiatement, par retour de courrier ilectronique ou par un autre moyen.
Re: Canceling a Reclamation FAST
After the process in question is cancelled just update the tape back to readwrite and all is fine again Rob -Original Message- From: Roger Deschner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Canceling a Reclamation FAST If you set a volume to ACCESS=DESTROYED in order to do what a CANCEL PROCESS really should have done in the first place, can use un-set it, and later try to read it again? e.g. on a different drive or after cleaning the drive in question? Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago [EMAIL PROTECTED] Academic Computing Communications Center On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Burton, Robert wrote: I usually cancel the process and then upd the input volume access=destroyed. thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-3849 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: James Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 4:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Canceling a Reclamation FAST When I cancel a process that is using multiple drives, like a 'move data' or 'reclamation', the process does not end until the file that it is working on has completed its move from source to destination tape. If I have an emergency restore that is stalled because it requires a drive and all the drives are tied up with processes that are in 'cancel pending' state, is there quick way of killing the processes that are using the drives without stopping the TSM server? Thanks JT AquatiCare Unlimited _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier ilectronique est confidentiel et protigi. L'expiditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) disigni(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier ilectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immidiatement, par retour de courrier ilectronique ou par un autre moyen. This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier ilectronique est confidentiel et protigi. L'expiditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) disigni(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier ilectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immidiatement, par retour de courrier ilectronique ou par un autre moyen.
Re: Canceling a Reclamation FAST
I usually cancel the process and then upd the input volume access=destroyed. thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-3849 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: James Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 4:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Canceling a Reclamation FAST When I cancel a process that is using multiple drives, like a 'move data' or 'reclamation', the process does not end until the file that it is working on has completed its move from source to destination tape. If I have an emergency restore that is stalled because it requires a drive and all the drives are tied up with processes that are in 'cancel pending' state, is there quick way of killing the processes that are using the drives without stopping the TSM server? Thanks JT AquatiCare Unlimited _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier ilectronique est confidentiel et protigi. L'expiditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) disigni(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier ilectronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immidiatement, par retour de courrier ilectronique ou par un autre moyen.
TSM 5116 server / storageagent performance degradation
We were running tsm 4.2.2.4 on an S7A AIX server. We were putting through approx 1.7 TB nightly with approx 85% going to disk storagepool and the remaining going direct to tape. We were also testing Lan-free with Gresham EDT-Distributape and STK acsls/9840 tape drives and we were consistently on an UDB api backup receiving 15 MB/s one month ago we upgraded all server and storageagents to tsm 5.1.1.6 level and since then we have seen performance drop. We are having trouble getting through the 1.7 TB nightly. The same lan-free tests are only getting us around 10 MB/s. We will be upgrading to a bigger and more powerful aix server this weekend in hopes that the performance drop is related to our S7a server reaching the end of its life span but I know when we upgraded from tsm 3.7 to 4.2 we saw an increase in server performance, I'm worried that the upgrade from 4.2 to 5.1 has gone in reverse. Has anybody sees anything remotely similar after an upgrade to tsm 5.1.1.6 ??? thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-3849 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:Robert.Burton;rbc.com This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen.
Re: TSM 5116 server / storageagent performance degradation
no we are still using 32 bit -Original Message- From: David E Ehresman [mailto:deehre01;LOUISVILLE.EDU] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 5116 server / storageagent performance degradation Did you go to 64 bit mode when you went to 5.1.1.6? We have some clients that start out backing up at a good rate and then shift into a mode where they are running very very slow. We now think this might be a 64 bit mode server problem. David [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/15/02 09:20AM We were running tsm 4.2.2.4 on an S7A AIX server. We were putting through approx 1.7 TB nightly with approx 85% going to disk storagepool and the remaining going direct to tape. We were also testing Lan-free with Gresham EDT-Distributape and STK acsls/9840 tape drives and we were consistently on an UDB api backup receiving 15 MB/s one month ago we upgraded all server and storageagents to tsm 5.1.1.6 level and since then we have seen performance drop. We are having trouble getting through the 1.7 TB nightly. The same lan-free tests are only getting us around 10 MB/s. We will be upgrading to a bigger and more powerful aix server this weekend in hopes that the performance drop is related to our S7a server reaching the end of its life span but I know when we upgraded from tsm 3.7 to 4.2 we saw an increase in server performance, I'm worried that the upgrade from 4.2 to 5.1 has gone in reverse. Has anybody sees anything remotely similar after an upgrade to tsm 5.1.1.6 ??? thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-3849 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:Robert.Burton;rbc.com This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protigi. L'expiditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) disigni(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immidiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen.
Re: Space reclamation runs, but tapes don't free up
There is a known problem opened with IBM on this... We were told to upgrade to tsm 4.2.2.4 or higher...this seemed to clean up most but not all these problems... If you q content on the tape it is empty, yet if you try to do reclamation or delete it you are informed that there is still data on it We were told we would have to issue an auditdb to clean it up...this would knock our production server off the air for over 27 hrs...so we opted no to do this When we tried to upgrade from tsm 4.2.2.4 to tsm 5.1.0.0 we experienced the following problem: Item PQ64254 APAR Identifier .. PQ64254 Last Changed..02/09/12 ANRD IMINIT.C GROUP.MEMBERS ERROR 8 UPGRADEDB We were informed to upgrade to 5.1.1.4 or higher and run a cleanup backupgroups commandthis also fixed nothing I have an additiona PMR opened with IBM on this problem and am waiting to hear back... thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-3849 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Naylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Space reclamation runs, but tapes don't free up Michael, Why has your tape got a status of filling ? That would be a reason why it would not return to scratch Are all your problem tapes like that? Michael Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/02/2002 01:34:26 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE) Subject: Re: Space reclamation runs, but tapes don't free up We are having a similar problem with our server (v4.2.2.12, on OS/390 v2.10). Here is my problem: The reclaim runs, and ends, but the tapes are not being updated as empty. If I run an audit of the tape volume, it will then go to empty, and be deleted during our next MOVEDRMEDIA command. Here is an expamle of one tape that we ran the audit on: Before Audit query: Volume Name: 321343 Storage Pool Name: DEV_TAPEOS Device Class Name: 3590_OFFSITE_COPY Estimated Capacity (MB): 9,216.0 Pct Util: 0.0 Volume Status: Filling Access: Offsite Pct. Reclaimable Space: 100.0 Scratch Volume?: Yes In Error State?: No Number of Writable Sides: 1 Number of Times Mounted: 2 Write Pass Number: 1 Approx. Date Last Written: 08/01/2002 01:20:28 Approx. Date Last Read: 08/01/2002 00:31:52 Date Became Pending: Number of Write Errors: 0 Number of Read Errors: 0 Volume Location: TSM390 ast Update by (administrator): MOOREH Last Update Date/Time: 08/01/2002 01:34:34 After Audit query: Volume Name: 321343 Storage Pool Name: DEV_TAPEOS Device Class Name: 3590_OFFSITE_COPY Estimated Capacity (MB): 0.0 Pct Util: 0.0 Volume Status: Empty Access: Offsite Pct. Reclaimable Space: 0.0 Scratch Volume?: Yes In Error State?: No Number of Writable Sides: 1 Number of Times Mounted: 2 Write Pass Number: 1 Approx. Date Last Written: 08/01/2002 01:20:28 Approx. Date Last Read: 08/01/2002 00:31:52 Date Became Pending: Number of Write Errors: 0 Number of Read Errors: 0 Volume Location: TSM390 Last Update by (administrator): MOOREH Last Update Date/Time: 09/27/2002 09:49:11 I do have an ETR open with IBM on this issue. Michael Moore VF Services Inc. 121 Smith Street Greensboro, NC 27420-1488 Voice: 336-332-4423 Fax: 336-332-4544 Brazner, Bob Bob.Brazner@JCI.To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] COM cc: Sent by: ADSM: Subject: Space reclamation runs, but tapes don't free up Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU 10/01/02 08:13 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager System is TSM 4.1.2.0 on AIX 4.3.3. I run reclamation daily on my tape backup copy pool, but the backlog of unreclaimed tapes continues to grow (as determined by SQL select looking for volumes in the pool that meet my reclamation threshold - 60%). The space
Re: Problem deleting filespace SYSTEM OBJECT
we are having the same problemand the auditdb for a 37 GB database took over 26 HRs... thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-3849 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Gerhard Rentschler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 11:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problem deleting filespace SYSTEM OBJECT Hello, I ran into the following problem with TSM 5.1.1.4 on AIX 4.3.3. Using the command del filespace rus_zsdsinz 'SYSTEM OBJECT' I get the following messages in the activity log: 09/18/02 16:20:33 ANR0984I Process 452 for DELETE FILESPACE started in the BACKGROUND at 16:20:33. 09/18/02 16:20:33 ANR0800I DELETE FILESPACE * (fsId=4) for node RUS_ZSDSINZ started as process 452. 09/18/02 16:20:33 ANR0802I DELETE FILESPACE * (fsId=4) (backup/archive data) for node RUS_ZSDSINZ started. 09/18/02 16:20:34 ANRD imfsdel.c(1860): ThreadId84 Error 1123 deleting group leader 0 585684848. 09/18/02 16:20:34 ANR0985I Process 452 for DELETE FILESPACE running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at 16:20:34. I opened a PMR. Level 1 suggested to run the command cleanup backupgroup and retry the delete filespace command. It didn't help. The next advice was to upgrade to TSM 5.1.1.6 and retry the cleanup backupgroup and del filespace. The next thing to do would be a dsmserv auditdb. However, this would take a lot of time with my 55 GB database. Has anyone else seen this? Level 1 told me that he found only one similar problem. Best regards Gerhard --- Gerhard Rentschleremail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Regional Computing Center tel. ++49/711/685 5806 University of Stuttgart fax: ++49/711/682357 Allmandring 30a D 70550 Stuttgart Germany -- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ==
Re: Exchange file performance
I understand that there may be some limitations to the Exchange API but I am not using this. I have shutdown all Exchange services and I am backing up the database offline using TSM BA client 5.1 and I still see the same performance of 8mb/sec. So in this case I am simply copying the file as flat file. I would expect better performance than this. Any ideas? Thanks Wesley Mofford Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-4547 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 9:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Exchange file performance Exchange is not a file level backup. It is more like a database unload. The Microsoft Exchange Backup API is only designed for 30GB/hr. Funny, that figures out to 8.33MB/sec. However, on much faster servers with FC disk I have seen a little faster than this. Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Naptheon, INC 757-688-8180 -Original Message- From: Burton, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange file performance Hi All, I am running TSM server 5.1.0.0, TSM BA Client 5.1.0.1, TDP for Exchange 2.2.0.0 and Exchange 2000. I noticed that when I backup the exchange database using TDP or BA client I only get approximately 8mb/sec aggregate. So I created a file of the same size, 1.4gb, and I got 25mb/sec aggregate. Has anyone encountered a performance difference such this when backing up Exchange files? Wesley Mofford Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-4547 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. == -- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ==
Re: Missing DRM license
You have to force re-install the license.cert or the license.rte file a second timeI do not remember which file you need to re-install but it is one of the license files Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-3849 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Anderson, Michael - HMIS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Missing DRM license I have upgraded from TSM version 4.1.5.3 to 4.2.2.0 on AIX 4.3.3. I have one problem when I am registering my license I am missing the drm license file. How do I retrieve this? Thanks Mike Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ==
Exchange file performance
Hi All, I am running TSM server 5.1.0.0, TSM BA Client 5.1.0.1, TDP for Exchange 2.2.0.0 and Exchange 2000. I noticed that when I backup the exchange database using TDP or BA client I only get approximately 8mb/sec aggregate. So I created a file of the same size, 1.4gb, and I got 25mb/sec aggregate. Has anyone encountered a performance difference such this when backing up Exchange files? Wesley Mofford Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-4547 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ==
TSM aix server code 4.2.2.4
Anybody out there running the AIX version of the 4.2.2.4 server code. We are experiencing conflict lock problems on 4.2.2.0 and we have been advised to go to 4.2.2.4 server level. Has anybody seen any problems with this level of code? Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-3849 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ==
Re: TSM (ADSM) for OS/400 (AS/400) platform.....
we are using TSM/400 V4 API with PTF SF53289 along with BRMS -Original Message- From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 4:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM (ADSM) for OS/400 (AS/400) platform. I guess I didn't ask the complete question. What are you using as a client, the old V3 client from IBM/Tivoli or Robot/SAVE ? Burton, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/15/2002 01:52 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: TSM (ADSM) for OS/400 (AS/400) platform. We are having great success with the os/400 client and are planning to migrate all as400 server to tsm for backups... We are getting approx. 8 MB/s (you have to make sure that the Ethernet card and the switch port is set at auto-detect or else transfer speeds are terrible) Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-3849 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 1:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM (ADSM) for OS/400 (AS/400) platform. I would like to know how folks who have an AS/400, backup their systems, to TSM and their experiences (good or bad) ! Last time I visited this issue, IBM did not support this (last client seems to be 3.x something) and you had to go to the HELP SYSTEMS/ROBOT folks. However, I have not had much luck in searching their site for info. Unfortunately, IBM seems to be updating the TSM client page (I keep getting a blank page) !! Zoltan Forray Virginia Commonwealth University - University Computing Center e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - voice: 804-828-4807 --- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. == -- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ==
Re: TSM (ADSM) for OS/400 (AS/400) platform.....
we got it at www1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/service/brms/tsmapia.bin and the ptf at www1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/service/brms/sf53289.bin -Original Message- From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM (ADSM) for OS/400 (AS/400) platform. Duh...I must be a little dense. Is the TSM/400 V4 API supplied by IBM/Tivoli ? I keep searching the Tivoli/IBM website but keep getting blank pages (yes, I have done numerous reloads/refreshes). Burton, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/16/2002 08:10 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: TSM (ADSM) for OS/400 (AS/400) platform. we are using TSM/400 V4 API with PTF SF53289 along with BRMS -Original Message- From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 4:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM (ADSM) for OS/400 (AS/400) platform. I guess I didn't ask the complete question. What are you using as a client, the old V3 client from IBM/Tivoli or Robot/SAVE ? Burton, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/15/2002 01:52 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: TSM (ADSM) for OS/400 (AS/400) platform. We are having great success with the os/400 client and are planning to migrate all as400 server to tsm for backups... We are getting approx. 8 MB/s (you have to make sure that the Ethernet card and the switch port is set at auto-detect or else transfer speeds are terrible) Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-3849 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 1:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM (ADSM) for OS/400 (AS/400) platform. I would like to know how folks who have an AS/400, backup their systems, to TSM and their experiences (good or bad) ! Last time I visited this issue, IBM did not support this (last client seems to be 3.x something) and you had to go to the HELP SYSTEMS/ROBOT folks. However, I have not had much luck in searching their site for info. Unfortunately, IBM seems to be updating the TSM client page (I keep getting a blank page) !! Zoltan Forray Virginia Commonwealth University - University Computing Center e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - voice: 804-828-4807 --- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. == -- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen
Re: TSM (ADSM) for OS/400 (AS/400) platform.....
We are having great success with the os/400 client and are planning to migrate all as400 server to tsm for backups... We are getting approx. 8 MB/s (you have to make sure that the Ethernet card and the switch port is set at auto-detect or else transfer speeds are terrible) Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-3849 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 1:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM (ADSM) for OS/400 (AS/400) platform. I would like to know how folks who have an AS/400, backup their systems, to TSM and their experiences (good or bad) ! Last time I visited this issue, IBM did not support this (last client seems to be 3.x something) and you had to go to the HELP SYSTEMS/ROBOT folks. However, I have not had much luck in searching their site for info. Unfortunately, IBM seems to be updating the TSM client page (I keep getting a blank page) !! Zoltan Forray Virginia Commonwealth University - University Computing Center e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - voice: 804-828-4807 --- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ==
Re: 9840 element addresses.
element 500 - 505 -Original Message- From: Jason Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 9840 element addresses. Hi, Would any one be able to confirm what the element addresses for 6 9840 drives in an L700 would be. ? Regards Jason --- Please note my e-mail address has changed to @rbc.com. / Veuillez noter que ma nouvelle adresse courriel est @rbc.com. This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ==
Re: ACSLS Library w/TSM 4.2.1.7 and database restore
We run database restores all the time with a acsls 9310 library on aix controlled by acsls. What we do is edit the devconfig file and define the library and one tape drive as manual devices... Then when the restore of the database starts it asks that the backup tape be mounted on the manual drive defined. We then log onto acssa on the acsls machine and issue a mount command to the tape drive. After the database is restored it will still have all your original library and tape drive definitions Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-3849 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rolf Bogus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ACSLS Library w/TSM 4.2.1.7 and database restore Hello Alex, Hello, Rolf. I wasn't able to find further information about how STK ACSLS libraries aren't supported during database restore. Where is this documented? we opened a PMR regarding this a couple of months ago. This PMR was closed with the comment that the STK ACSLS libraries are not supported in TSM 4.2 during database restores. Sorry, I cannot remember the APAR number and cannot look into the closed PMR because it already disappeared. Perhaps somebody of the Tivoli server people listing here can tell us more about it. Regards, Rolf Rolf Bogus email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Universitaetsrechenzentrum Im Neuenheimer Feld 293 phone: +49 (6221) 54 4507 D 69120 Heidelberg fax: +49 (6221) 54 5581 --- Please note my e-mail address has changed to @rbc.com. / Veuillez noter que ma nouvelle adresse courriel est @rbc.com. This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ==
EDT Distributape
Anybody out there using this product for lan free capabilities with STK's ACSLS? We are looking at evaling the product, Is there any known gotchya's we should consider before we start thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-3849 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Please note my e-mail address has changed to @rbc.com. / Veuillez noter que ma nouvelle adresse courriel est @rbc.com. This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ==
TSM and AIX HACMP environment
Hello fellow TSMers, I have a situation where one aix server is used for a HACMP failover node for 3 separate servers. Due to company auditors we have to have tsm passwords expired and re-generated every 35 days. I'm trying to figure out an easy way to run tsm activities on the HACMP client which may be 1 of 3 different clients at any one time. Has anyone out there set-up a configuration similar... any advise would be greatly appreciated thanks Robert Burton Enterprise Storage Network Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 * 416-348-3849 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ==
Re: Expiring DB2 backups
We created a separate management class for the DB backups and made the versioning 1, 0 for existing and deleted versions... We then have the DBA's imbed a delete backup for anything older than the time span they wish to keep in the scripts they use to run the api backups. Robert Burton Open System Storage Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 416-348-3849 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Eduardo Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 6:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Expiring DB2 backups Hi *SMers. As you know, when you backup DB2 it stamps an unique id to its backup, making it an active version forever, then you can't expire that backup. Does anyone know how to expire this kind of backups? Thanks in advance. = Do or Do Not, there is no try -Yoda. The Empire Strikes Back ___ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger: Comunicacisn instantanea gratis con tu gente - http://messenger.yahoo.es -- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ==
Re: IBM Storage Conference
I'm going again this year. This will be my second one in a row. I found it interesting and informative last year as the majority of the presentations related to my job function. I support TSM, NAS, point to point disk storage devices and a non IBM tape SAN. At the moment I'm in the process of setting up but a SAN, using a Shark and other storage vendor disk. Robert Burton Open System Storage Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 416-348-3849 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 12:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IBM Storage Conference Is anyone going to the IBM Storage conference in Las Vegas the week of the 20th? How good have these been in the past? Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (888) 997-9614 --- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ==
Re: SQL2025N An I/O error -50 occurred on media ADSM.
There is also an open APAR (can't remember the number) but when an UDB upgrade is done and adsm finds an empty tablespace it can get a -50 error Robert Burton Open System Storage Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 416-348-3849 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: MUSTAFA BAYTAR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SQL2025N An I/O error -50 occurred on media ADSM. The problem is probably related to your TCP/IP configuration. Attempt to 'ping' your ADSM server as soon as the error occurs. In addition, use 'query opt' to check the following settings on your ADSM server: 1. COMMTIMEOUT is on 60 (sec.) by default; increase to 900. 2. IDLETIMEOUT is on 15 (min.) by default. Parameter COMMTIMEOUT is reset by the following ADSM command: adsm setopt COMMTIMEOUT new value Pothula S Paparao To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9pothula@SG.cc: (bcc: MUSTAFA BAYTAR/ATIM/ICECEK) IBM.COM Subject: SQL2025N An I/O error -50 occurred on media ADSM. Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU 23.06.2001 10:43 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager hi all, we are often coming across this error while taking online backup from db2-server. this job is run from crontab at 00:00 hours. i m unable to trace out the problem , what causing database backup to fail. do any one knows about it. please reply immdly. Performing database backup type ONLINE issuing db2 backup database tcimain ONLINE USE ADSM WITHOUT PROMPTING 06-15-2001 02:02:05 BACKUP DATABASE tcimain ONLINE USE ADSM WITHOUT PROMPTING 06-15-2001 02:13:39 SQL2025N An I/O error -50 occurred on media ADSM. 06/15/01 02:13:39 Backup tcimain ONLINE USE ADSM WITHOUT PROMPTING sqlcode = -2025 #+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+# ADSM Backup End Time: 02:13:39 AM with rc= -2025 -- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ==
Re: HSM for NT
What sort of problems are you experiencingwe tested the OTG product and we thought it looked pretty good. Robert Burton Open System Storage Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 416-348-3849 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dearman, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: HSM for NT Is anyone using the HSM for NT product that intergrates with TSM called OTG Diskextender? Or is there any other products that do HSM on NT that intergrate with TSM. The OTG product is not very good I am having alot of problems with it. Thansk ***EMAIL DISCLAIMER** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the individual responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify the sender or contact Health Information Management (312) 996-3941. -- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ==
Re: 3494 checkin command
use the checklabel=no option Robert Burton Open System Storage Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 416-348-3849 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dearman, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 12:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 3494 checkin command Anyone know the command on a 3494 library to checkin volumes using the barcode only. I added 300 new tape to my library and it wants to mount each one instead of just using the barcode. What is the typical command you guys use to check in new scratch tape on a 3494. Thanks ***EMAIL DISCLAIMER** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the individual responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify the sender or contact Health Information Management (312) 996-3941. --- This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courriel est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen. ==
Re: 500GB Backup
We have benchmarked this to deathEMC/IBM and Hitachi disk we can get 8 to 10 MB/s, on both IBM 3590e's and STK 9840 we are getting 35 to 40 MB/sec -Original Message- From: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 11:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 500GB Backup Since when??? -Original Message- From: Burton, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 500GB Backup Tape direct is a heck of a lot faster than disk Robert Burton Open System Storage Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 416-348-3849 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dearman, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 500GB Backup Why would I send the data to tape first writing to disk is faster. -Original Message- From: Vibhute, Bandu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 3:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 500GB Backup What I understood from your setup is as follows. You are doing cold backup everyday using TSM disk pools. Your backup time is 6 hrs for 500 Gig and you will be backing up 1TB in next few months. Your TSM server has only one SSA Adapter. If you could do following changes in your setup, You should be able to reduce backup window time. 1. Schedule backup with multiple threads using Gigabit Fiber Channel Interface. 2. Configure Copy group to send backup data directly to tapes( Don't use disk group) -Bandu -Original Message- From: Dearman, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 1:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 500GB Backup The amount of data is the same everday 500GB full backup. I'm using one SSA card in the tsm system. I could get Gig cards if I have proof that I'm maxing out the current 100mb cards in the system and I don't seem to be doing that. The tsm server is plugged into the same switch has the backup server and on the same ip subnet. Also, the database files that I'm backing up are just oracle dump files. The tsm serve is also running aix 4.3.3. -Original Message- From: Vibhute, Bandu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 12:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 500GB Backup We are backing up 2 servers of capacity 1.2 TB everyday. We have shark system and flash copy is implemented on shark. Without client interference we backup 1.2 Gig to TSM. It's running with 6 drives. No LAN/Free. But it's Client/Free backup. To restore we have placed Gbit Interfaces in Client and TSM Server. You need to give more information of your server and database. Are you doing incremental or full backup and which database you have? If incremental how much data is changed everyday? Can you afford GBit interface between data server and TSM? ( IT needs 2 adapter and 1 switch) How many drives your library have? How many SSA adapters are installed in server? Thank you, Bandu Vibhute, Bestfoods Baking Company, 55 Paradise Lane, Bay Shore, NY, 11706 Voice: 631-951-5212, Cell: 516-702-0323 -Original Message- From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 1:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 500GB Backup Importance: High Hi If I am correct IBM offers LAN free backup which is faster .But need to purchase additional s/w. pinni -Original Message- From: Dearman, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 500GB Backup I need to backup a 500GB database and my current setup is my tsm server is on the same ip subnet has the database server. Tsm is connected to 500GB of SSA storage with 5 RAID5 sets with two 50GB tsm volumes on each raid set. My though put to the disk only seems to be 9000 kB/s. Which doesn't seem very high to me. My backup time is about 6 hours. Does anyone have any better senarios for backing up this amount of data in the smallest amount of time soon. I am going to be backing up a 1Tb per day and I need to get me backup times to the lowest. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to do that. Thanks ***EMAIL DISCLAIMER** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the individual responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it and notify the sender or contact Health Information Management (312) 996-3941. WorldSecure Server baking.bestfoods.com made the following annotations on 04/27/01 13:24:11
Re: ACSLS Timeouts
Try changing the server option "AcsTimeoutX" to 100 We sometimes have ejects sitting in the cap for 10 to 11 hours before operators have a chance to remove them. Robert Burton Open System Storage Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 416-348-3849 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Warren, Matthew James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 4:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ACSLS Timeouts Hello, I have a problem at the moment; We have an ACSLS library. Whenever we do tape offsiting using DRM, the move drm * wherestate=mountable tostate=vault fails, because the tapes are left in the library cap / io station for longer than 10 mins. ACSLS returns the following; 04/19/01 14:10:16 ANR8856E ACSAPI sequence(125) request(16792) timed out, elapse time=00:10:07. 04/19/01 14:10:16 ANR8855E ACSAPI(acs_eject_volume) response with unsuccessful status, status=STATUS_IPC_FAILURE. It fails becuase the vaulting command is run at 14:00 each day but operators may not remove the tapes for up to 2 hours after that. That tapes sit in the IO cap, after 10 mins ACSLS is reporting back to TSM saying request timed out, but later the ops remove the tapes and they are no longer in the library. TSM thinks they are. Does anyone know how to chenge the length of the timeout for eject requests from TSM in an ACSLS managed library? Thanks, Matt. ___ Matthew Warren. GZPTXW EDS Core Infrastructure, UK Technical Services Group, Wavendon Tower, Milton Keynes. +44(0)1908284481 ___
Re: ACSLS Timeouts
dsmserv.opt -Original Message- From: Shekhar Dhotre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 10:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ACSLS Timeouts Where i can define this options in dsmserv.opt ? or is it in ACSLA? shekhar "Burton, Robert" [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 04/20/2001 08:47:18 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: ACSLS Timeouts Try changing the server option "AcsTimeoutX" to 100 We sometimes have ejects sitting in the cap for 10 to 11 hours before operators have a chance to remove them. Robert Burton Open System Storage Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 416-348-3849 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Warren, Matthew James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 4:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ACSLS Timeouts Hello, I have a problem at the moment; We have an ACSLS library. Whenever we do tape offsiting using DRM, the move drm * wherestate=mountable tostate=vault fails, because the tapes are left in the library cap / io station for longer than 10 mins. ACSLS returns the following; 04/19/01 14:10:16 ANR8856E ACSAPI sequence(125) request(16792) timed out, elapse time=00:10:07. 04/19/01 14:10:16 ANR8855E ACSAPI(acs_eject_volume) response with unsuccessful status, status=STATUS_IPC_FAILURE. It fails becuase the vaulting command is run at 14:00 each day but operators may not remove the tapes for up to 2 hours after that. That tapes sit in the IO cap, after 10 mins ACSLS is reporting back to TSM saying request timed out, but later the ops remove the tapes and they are no longer in the library. TSM thinks they are. Does anyone know how to chenge the length of the timeout for eject requests from TSM in an ACSLS managed library? Thanks, Matt. ___ Matthew Warren. GZPTXW EDS Core Infrastructure, UK Technical Services Group, Wavendon Tower, Milton Keynes. +44(0)1908284481 ___
Re: Incredibly slow restore
Check and make sure your network settings are not auto-detect Robert Burton Open System Storage Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 416-348-3849 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Geirr Halvorsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 8:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Incredibly slow restore Hello people, one of my customers is running into the following problem; With TSM server 3.7 on NT 4 sp6a, and TSM client 3.7 on NT4 sp6a, restore is really slow. Checking all normal parameters in both server and client .opt files does not seem to help. My suspiscion is then turned to network issues, but according to the customer, they do not have any network problems. When I restore using the client GUI, and watch the status indicator, when a file reaches 100%, it waits for a long time (bigger file - longer time) before it continues with the next, I have also watched performance/utililzation of CPU, memory and network traffic, on both client and server while doing this, and none of these indicates that something is unusual. Both CPU and mem is low, network is maxed, but drops when a file is done. The result is a throughput somewhere around 950MB per hour. Not very impressing. Is this likely to be a TSM problem, or in other words - where should I go from here? Any suggestions will be helpful! Geirr Halvorsen Tech, Consultant FourLeaf Technologies Denmark.
Re: emulex LP8000 HBA
Rejean...thanks for the info...how do you load firmware onto the emulex card after you have de-installed the emulex drivers. You have to use the lputil utility to do this Robert Burton Open System Storage Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 416-348-3849 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rejean Larivee/Quebec/IBM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 1:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: emulex LP8000 HBA Hello, your adapter needs to be configured as "fcs0" device for it to work with the TSM smit menus. Since your adapter is defined as an lpfc0 device, this tells me that you have loaded the "emulex" device driver. The Emulex device driver corresponds to the following filesets : devices.pci.lpfc.diag devices.pci.lpfc.rte Those filesets are provided by Emulex. In order to have the device recognized as a fcs0 device instead of lpfc0 device, you need to remove those two filesets and rerun cfgmgr. You of course will need to have the proper IBM AIX fibre channel filesets installed. Those filesets are dicussed in the TSM server readme. Have a great day ! - Rejean Larivee IBM TSM/ADSM Level 2 Support Joel Fuhrman [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 12/13/2000 01:58:24 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: emulex LP8000 HBA It took a process of comparing the different cards on the Emulex web page. Since its a short card with only 2 jumpers, it was an lp8000. After running cfgmgr, an lsdev -C shows lpfc0 as Emulex LP8000 Fibre Channel Adapter. On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Suad Musovich wrote: How can you tell whether it's a LP8000 (short of ripping off the lid)? Cheers, Suad -- On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 12:25:17AM -0800, Joel Fuhrman wrote: I'm trying to configure a new H80 AIX 4.3.3 host with TSM 4.1.1 using an Emulex LP8000 host bus adapter connected to an STK 9840 fibre channel disk drive. Per the installation instructions in the Quick Start Guidem I loaded the fibre channel pre-req's for the fcrte fileset; but they seem to be for the Emulex LP7000 card. Config manager, cfgmgr, wants the level 8 drivers which I don't believe IBM released. So I loaded the drivers from Emulex. Cfgmgr will configure the devices; but "smit tsm_devices" fails to list or find any fiber channel devices. If you have a working config using the Emulex LP8000 would you mind sharing how you set it up?
Re: ANS1312E Server media mount not possible
Larry, check the client on the server and make sure that you do not have mountpoints set to 0 Robert Burton Open System Storage Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 416-348-3849 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Lawrence Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 11:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ANS1312E Server media mount not possible Hi: Yet another peculiar situation that has popped up since the upgrade to TSM 3.7.2 on the server: Backgound: - the problem only occurs on this node in an SP environment - the node is the control workstation - I can ping the backup (TSM) server from the node with the failure - at the time of the incremental backup - dsmc i - I have checked the drives and mounts and they are online and not in use. - what I get is: [rscws] /home/root/tsmfiles # dsmc Tivoli Storage Manager Command Line Backup Client Interface - Version 3, Release 7, Level 2.0 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation, 1990, 2000, All Rights Reserved. tsm i Node Name: RSCWS Session established with server BACKUP: AIX-RS/6000 Server Version 3, Release 7, Level 2.0 Server date/time: 10/11/00 09:37:28 Last access: 10/11/00 09:24:15 Incremental backup of volume '/' Incremental backup of volume '/usr' Incremental backup of volume '/var' Incremental backup of volume '/home' Incremental backup of volume '/xrsa' Incremental backup of volume '/spdata' Incremental backup of volume '/usr/lpp/sysback/images/all' Incremental backup of volume '/usr/sys/inst.images' ANS1898I * Processed 1,500 files * Normal File--37,888 /TT_DB/property_table.ind [Sent] Normal File--18,432 /TT_DB/property_table.rec [Sent] Normal File--11,264 /TT_DB/property_table.var [Sent] Special File--0 /dev/error more files here, then Normal File--61,440 /etc/objrepos/product.vc [Sent] Normal File-- 128 /etc/security/failedlogin.1 [Sent] Normal File--80 /etc/security/adsm/BACKUP [Sent] Total number of objects inspected:2,356 Total number of objects backed up:0 Total number of objects updated: 0 Total number of objects rebound: 0 Total number of objects deleted: 0 Total number of objects expired: 0 Total number of objects failed: 0 Total number of bytes transferred: 790.12 KB Data transfer time:1.70 sec Network data transfer rate: 462.54 KB/sec Aggregate data transfer rate: 97.91 KB/sec Objects compressed by:0% Elapsed processing time: 00:00:08 ANS1312E Server media mount not possible Larry Clark NYS Thruway Authority
IBM Storage Symposium
Anybody out there go to the IBM Storage Symposium last week in San Diego and what did you think of it Robert Burton Open System Storage Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 416-348-3849 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
STK / TSM question
Hello Everyone, Just wondering if anybody has any suggestions for a problem I am having. Have an STK 9310 with 8 9840 drives, being controlled, of course, by ACSLS(5.3.2). TSM Server is 3.7.3.0 (AIX). We had a problem encountered that killed our Library as TSM was in the process of using it. 6 out of 8 drives went unavailable. Since that time STK has been in and corrected the library problems. The 2 drives that were not being used at the time of the crash are working fine yet the 6 that are unavailable I cannot get back online to TSM. When I update the drive it replies that the drive is in useIf I try to delete and redefine I get reply drive is in use. Does anyone know of a way to get these drives back to TSM without having to cycle the server Any help would be greatly appreciated. Robert Burton Open System Storage Analyst Royal Bank of Canada 315 Front St West Toronto, On, M5V 3A4 416-348-3849 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
