Re: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution
have a look: http://www.intracom-telecom.com/en/products/wireless_network_systems/ptmp_backhaul_access/wibas.htm 2015-05-30 4:37 GMT+02:00 Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappytelecom.net: Your most viable option would be 39Ghz. or 28Ghz You can sub-lease licence from:- Straight Path Communication You will have to check with them as to what they own in your area. Cambridge Networks (www.cbnl.com) has 28ghz PTMP sector, and is supposed to have PTMP in 39Ghz in the near future. Hit me off list if you want a contact at Straight Path, and Talk to Jeff Broadwick @ Convergence Tech for info on cbnl gear. As for 24ghz, if you really want to know The only folks that I know off who make a 24ghz PTMP is Japan Radio Company.. JRC Hit me off list if you want a contact for them :) Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net - Original Message - From: Brett A Mansfield li...@silverlakeinternet.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 5:32:37 PM Subject: [AFMUG] PTMP backhaul solution I'm looking for the best high capacity and low cost PTMP solution. This is for my backhauls to distribute to smaller cells in a large area. Anyone know of something that fits this description? Thank you, Brett A Mansfield
Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa Firmware
we had the same Problem with the mounting kid.. 2015-05-31 21:43 GMT+02:00 Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappytelecom.net: Yeah.. I understand that is because the nut is a locking nut. I wonder if there was a lock washer instead, it would be be better. Regards. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net From: Stefan Englhardt s...@genias.net To: af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 2:28:41 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa Firmware We have done it this way. Fixing the screws for vertical moves the antenna vertical. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappytelecom.net Datum: 31.05.2015 13:59 (GMT+01:00) An: af@afmug.com Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa Firmware Stefan, Take a closer look at the bracket, it is very smartly designed, and not so obvious on the best way to align... I went thru the same process (struggle).. until my partner by chance discovered what I was missing:- Clamp the bracket on the pole, adjust your horizontal first... tighten the bracket from the clamp side... once done.. you can loosen the nuts on the radio bracket side and adjust the vertical ... I will suggest to Mimosa folks to do a one page how to doc on it. Regards Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net From: Stefan Englhardt s...@genias.net To: af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 2:46:48 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa Firmware Yes. You can fix one plane at a time. But while fixing the screws for elevation you tilt elevation. So you've to press against the antenna while fixing the screws. Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Rory Conaway Gesendet: Sonntag, 31. Mai 2015 08:33 An: af@afmug.com Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa Firmware Stefan, don't the brackets only allow movement in one plane at a time? Also, can you not flip one around for thinner poles? Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 11:24 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa Firmware Yes. Now it's morning ;-)). Installing the links the next 2-3 Weeks. We're replacing our Radwin 2000C installations. Happy with the B5s. One thing they might improve is the mount. While fixing the screws it is difficult to not change Elevation. With thin poles the mount does not fix enough. After a 80-100km/h wind we had to realign a B5. Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Jaime Solorza Gesendet: Sonntag, 31. Mai 2015 00:12 An: Animal Farm Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa Firmware Isnt it night there Stephan? Keep us posted. .I might be installing 10 links if we win the bid. Its in central Texas and travel expenses might keep us out. Jaime Solorza On May 30, 2015 2:03 PM, Stefan Englhardt s...@genias.net wrote: I am eager to see it coming. Just installing 5 more links. Thanks for the info, Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Jaime Fink Gesendet: Samstag, 30. Mai 2015 21:08 An: af@afmug.com Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Mimosa Firmware Stefan, Actually we've been adding a bunch more stuff to keep improving performance and link stability beyond what we originally committed which was the reason for the brief slow down. It's a big release with great improvements. Should be out very soon (in final test in our field network) with also another new major roadmap update on our support site. Stay tuned! Cheers, Jaime Fink CPO Co-Founder Mimosa On May 30, 2015, at 11:50 AM, Stefan Englhardt s...@genias.net wrote: Seems to be a bigger problem/delay there as they removed their firmware roadmap?
Re: [AFMUG] Mounting a 6 foot dish on a Non Pen.
This install is on a roof next to a parapet so mounting a stiff arm to the parapet will probably be the way to go. Thanks for the info guys, most helpful. On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Erich Kaiser er...@northcentraltower.com wrote: Rohn 25 would not work, you would be better off with 4.5 15ft pipe non-pen and a separate non-pen for stiff arm, it would need to be angled toward the weight of the non-pen. I have a non-pen with 15ft 4.5 pipe, just cant remember brand name at this moment. Are you mounting on a roof or anywhere near a wall? Even some angle iron would work as a stiff arm. Erich Kaiser North Central Tower er...@northcentraltower.com Office: 630-621-4804 Cell: 630-777-9291 On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Sam Lambie samtaos...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm the tower idea is a not bad. I have a ROHN 25 sitting in the back. I could make a sled for it. Would a 25 work? Or is it too flimsy? On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Justin Wilson - MTIN li...@mtin.net wrote: You need an actual 10 foot tower. You could engineer that to be non penetrating. The dish needs a stabilizer arm to tie back to something. Otherwise you will be visiting it often. If it’s licensed a 1 degree movement could mean the difference between a -60 and a -70. You could do something like the attached, but those are 4 foot dishes. 80 mph is roughly is somewhere around 700 foot pounds of torque on one axis and 900 on another. Thats a lot of power for anything to hold. There is a reason most big dishes are mounted to a tower near the guy wires on a guyed tower. For another example look at the picture on this wikipedia article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_broadband Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net http://www.mtin.net Managed Services – xISP Solutions – Data Centers http://www.thebrotherswisp.com Podcast about xISP topics http://www.midwest-ix.com Peering – Transit – Internet Exchange On Jun 1, 2015, at 3:47 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: on our 4' dish we had planned on using angle iron vertically in one corner of the tray with struts going down to the two corners left and right for attaching the stabilizer if we needed it On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Sam Lambie samtaos...@gmail.com wrote: Hey all, I am looking to mount a 6' dish on a 10' tall mast (4 1/2 OD) at the top of the mast with something like this: https://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=504727 Using a Cinderblock tray as the base. My question is, would this work? And how would I keep the dish from twisting on the mast? Sam -- -- *Sam Lambie* Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com http://www.newmex.com/ -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- -- *Sam Lambie* Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com http://www.newmex.com -- -- *Sam Lambie* Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com http://www.newmex.com
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
I'm thinking we just need to have a comedy roast at AFMUG or one of the shows and let the best comedians have at it. Mark On 6/2/15 2:40 PM, Glen Waldrop wrote: There should be a book compiled... The Poetry of AFMUG. *From:* Ken Hohhof mailto:af...@kwisp.com *Sent:* Tuesday, June 02, 2015 11:01 AM *To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT I’m not sure if it’s the cheap part or the whores part that bothers him. There’s a joke that ends: “What do you think I am?” “We’ve already established what you are, now we’re just haggling about the price.” *From:* Rory Conaway mailto:r...@triadwireless.net *Sent:* Tuesday, June 02, 2015 10:15 AM *To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT I agree that the “cheap whores” comment is both the most politically incorrect and the funniest thing I’ve seen this morning. Kudos. Rory *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Colin Stanners *Sent:* Tuesday, June 2, 2015 8:13 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT I'm not all that fond of running UBNT, but cheap whores are always there when you need them. I should be fired, so I can go work at mcdonalds, make more money, and get fat too. Also recently: if they're going to splice themselves, at least they're using a quality product to do it wrong Is anyone still keeping a list of Steve quotes? When perusing the messages from this list I often search for certain posters who send out the most informative posts in terms of technology, business or history (and there's a lot! off the top of my head: 3 Chucks / Rory / Ken / Daniel / Gino / 2 Pauls / Forrest / Eric and many more names that I forget)... and Steve. Insightful and hilarious POV. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:52 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: I changed it to WPA2 AES and rebooted it a few times it eventually let the other side connect. Is it backward compatible and I was just too impatient? I dont like running beta, Im not all that fond of running UBNT, but cheap whores are always there when you need them. The problem boils down to poor network management on my part, that WPA tkip should not have been configured on that link, I dont know why it was, I should be fired, so I can go work at mcdonalds, make more money, and get fat too. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com mailto:jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote: The newer production firmwares don't allow it either. WPA2-AES offloads the encryption to a dedicated processor or something like that, so it does not affect the performance of the radio. It seems like that is what I read. We use it on all of our links anyway so it wasn't a change for us. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com mailto:cstann...@gmail.com wrote: Downgrade firmware, or I'm pretty sure you need to drive to the other end (or use a backup link) to change it. Don't use beta firmware on production links... (I understand using beta firmware is often required to get the cheap Ubiquiti equipment working well, but that's another discussion). On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: does anybody know a trick to get a radio set to client that is using wpa2-tkip to connect to this AP that will only do none, wpa-aes and wpa2-aes. I dont know why the link was set up tkip, but apparently this beta firmware wont let you use it On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- Mark Radabaugh m...@amplex.net 419-837-5015 x1021 m...@amplex.net
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
There should be a book compiled... The Poetry of AFMUG. From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 11:01 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT I’m not sure if it’s the cheap part or the whores part that bothers him. There’s a joke that ends: “What do you think I am?” “We’ve already established what you are, now we’re just haggling about the price.” From: Rory Conaway Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 10:15 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT I agree that the “cheap whores” comment is both the most politically incorrect and the funniest thing I’ve seen this morning. Kudos. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Colin Stanners Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 8:13 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT I'm not all that fond of running UBNT, but cheap whores are always there when you need them. I should be fired, so I can go work at mcdonalds, make more money, and get fat too. Also recently: if they're going to splice themselves, at least they're using a quality product to do it wrong Is anyone still keeping a list of Steve quotes? When perusing the messages from this list I often search for certain posters who send out the most informative posts in terms of technology, business or history (and there's a lot! off the top of my head: 3 Chucks / Rory / Ken / Daniel / Gino / 2 Pauls / Forrest / Eric and many more names that I forget)... and Steve. Insightful and hilarious POV. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:52 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: I changed it to WPA2 AES and rebooted it a few times it eventually let the other side connect. Is it backward compatible and I was just too impatient? I dont like running beta, Im not all that fond of running UBNT, but cheap whores are always there when you need them. The problem boils down to poor network management on my part, that WPA tkip should not have been configured on that link, I dont know why it was, I should be fired, so I can go work at mcdonalds, make more money, and get fat too. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote: The newer production firmwares don't allow it either. WPA2-AES offloads the encryption to a dedicated processor or something like that, so it does not affect the performance of the radio. It seems like that is what I read. We use it on all of our links anyway so it wasn't a change for us. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com wrote: Downgrade firmware, or I'm pretty sure you need to drive to the other end (or use a backup link) to change it. Don't use beta firmware on production links... (I understand using beta firmware is often required to get the cheap Ubiquiti equipment working well, but that's another discussion). On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: does anybody know a trick to get a radio set to client that is using wpa2-tkip to connect to this AP that will only do none, wpa-aes and wpa2-aes. I dont know why the link was set up tkip, but apparently this beta firmware wont let you use it On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] Mounting a 6 foot dish on a Non Pen.
On 6/2/15 15:41, Ken Hohhof wrote: Just make sure it isn’t a faux parapet, just for show or to hide the ugly stuff on the roof. Attaching part of a 6' antenna to it will surely give you that answer, too. ~Seth
Re: [AFMUG] Email blocked because of Client IP, not Server IP
Sounds like he is sending mail directly out to the Internet (perhaps using a local SMTP server) instead of using your SMTP server. On Jun 2, 2015, at 5:32 PM, Nate Burke n...@blastcomm.com wrote: I have a customer complaining about barracuda rejecting emails he is sending because of a 'reputation' problem. But the IP Address they reference is the end user's IP, not the server IP. Shouldn't the reputation be based on the Mail server, not where the mailserver had sourced the email from? Is this a setting in Barracuda? I don't see any other rejections from barracuda appliances except to this one domain. Nate
Re: [AFMUG] Email blocked because of Client IP, not Server IP
he should get his IP addressed. It may be that his provider doesnt have appropriate reverse DNS, baracuda looks, I remember when we had to do it, we had our records listed with something like dynamic, or client or something, theres a list of words that flag you. but, of course this only matters if the ISP can or will do anything about it. He may be able to delist himself temporarily. It may also be he is just listed because he was relaying spam To verify this is the issue he can send an email to the same address one from a client, one from webmail, if the webmail gets through, then it verifies thats the actual problem. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Nate Burke n...@blastcomm.com wrote: I have a customer complaining about barracuda rejecting emails he is sending because of a 'reputation' problem. But the IP Address they reference is the end user's IP, not the server IP. Shouldn't the reputation be based on the Mail server, not where the mailserver had sourced the email from? Is this a setting in Barracuda? I don't see any other rejections from barracuda appliances except to this one domain. Nate -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
[AFMUG] Email blocked because of Client IP, not Server IP
I have a customer complaining about barracuda rejecting emails he is sending because of a 'reputation' problem. But the IP Address they reference is the end user's IP, not the server IP. Shouldn't the reputation be based on the Mail server, not where the mailserver had sourced the email from? Is this a setting in Barracuda? I don't see any other rejections from barracuda appliances except to this one domain. Nate
Re: [AFMUG] Email blocked because of Client IP, not Server IP
On 6/2/15 14:32, Nate Burke wrote: I have a customer complaining about barracuda rejecting emails he is sending because of a 'reputation' problem. But the IP Address they reference is the end user's IP, not the server IP. Shouldn't the reputation be based on the Mail server, not where the mailserver had sourced the email from? Is this a setting in Barracuda? I don't see any other rejections from barracuda appliances except to this one domain. Yeah it's called deep scanning or deep header checking something like that. It makes it check all IP addresses in all the headers, not just the connecting server's IP. ~Seth
Re: [AFMUG] Mounting a 6 foot dish on a Non Pen.
Just make sure it isn’t a faux parapet, just for show or to hide the ugly stuff on the roof. From: Sam Lambie Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 2:37 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mounting a 6 foot dish on a Non Pen. This install is on a roof next to a parapet so mounting a stiff arm to the parapet will probably be the way to go. Thanks for the info guys, most helpful. On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Erich Kaiser er...@northcentraltower.com wrote: Rohn 25 would not work, you would be better off with 4.5 15ft pipe non-pen and a separate non-pen for stiff arm, it would need to be angled toward the weight of the non-pen. I have a non-pen with 15ft 4.5 pipe, just cant remember brand name at this moment. Are you mounting on a roof or anywhere near a wall? Even some angle iron would work as a stiff arm. Erich Kaiser North Central Tower er...@northcentraltower.com Office: 630-621-4804 Cell: 630-777-9291 On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Sam Lambie samtaos...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm the tower idea is a not bad. I have a ROHN 25 sitting in the back. I could make a sled for it. Would a 25 work? Or is it too flimsy? On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Justin Wilson - MTIN li...@mtin.net wrote: You need an actual 10 foot tower. You could engineer that to be non penetrating. The dish needs a stabilizer arm to tie back to something. Otherwise you will be visiting it often. If it’s licensed a 1 degree movement could mean the difference between a -60 and a -70. You could do something like the attached, but those are 4 foot dishes. 80 mph is roughly is somewhere around 700 foot pounds of torque on one axis and 900 on another. Thats a lot of power for anything to hold. There is a reason most big dishes are mounted to a tower near the guy wires on a guyed tower. For another example look at the picture on this wikipedia article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_broadband Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net http://www.mtin.net Managed Services – xISP Solutions – Data Centers http://www.thebrotherswisp.com Podcast about xISP topics http://www.midwest-ix.com Peering – Transit – Internet Exchange On Jun 1, 2015, at 3:47 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: on our 4' dish we had planned on using angle iron vertically in one corner of the tray with struts going down to the two corners left and right for attaching the stabilizer if we needed it On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Sam Lambie samtaos...@gmail.com wrote: Hey all, I am looking to mount a 6' dish on a 10' tall mast (4 1/2 OD) at the top of the mast with something like this: https://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=504727 Using a Cinderblock tray as the base. My question is, would this work? And how would I keep the dish from twisting on the mast? Sam -- -- Sam Lambie Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- -- Sam Lambie Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com -- -- Sam Lambie Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com
Re: [AFMUG] Email blocked because of Client IP, not Server IP
http://barracudasucks.org/ - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: Nate Burke n...@blastcomm.com To: Animal Farm af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 4:32:27 PM Subject: [AFMUG] Email blocked because of Client IP, not Server IP I have a customer complaining about barracuda rejecting emails he is sending because of a 'reputation' problem. But the IP Address they reference is the end user's IP, not the server IP. Shouldn't the reputation be based on the Mail server, not where the mailserver had sourced the email from? Is this a setting in Barracuda? I don't see any other rejections from barracuda appliances except to this one domain. Nate
[AFMUG] IS binoculars
Has anyone used image stabilization binoculars like the ones from Canon? Are they worth the money? (for WISP use, not birdwatching, stargazing, or snooping on the neighbors)
Re: [AFMUG] IS binoculars
Come on now - you know you're going to find other uses for them... On Wednesday, June 3, 2015, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote: Has anyone used image stabilization binoculars like the ones from Canon? Are they worth the money? (for WISP use, not birdwatching, stargazing, or snooping on the neighbors)
[AFMUG] WTF UBNT
Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
does anybody know a trick to get a radio set to client that is using wpa2-tkip to connect to this AP that will only do none, wpa-aes and wpa2-aes. I dont know why the link was set up tkip, but apparently this beta firmware wont let you use it On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] Portable Wifi Bridge and/or Router.
Get 2 airgateways take the boards out of the case re wire it for what you need put your own case on it get a small RC battery for power when on the move — Sent from Mailbox On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Tyler Treat tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com wrote: I did a ubnt pico attached to a 751 one time for vacation in Dominican Republic. I'd imagine that would fit your bill, although probable not the best solution. However you might be able to do a 493g with 2 wireless cards. I think there's an issue with having a single wireless card in both AP and Client mode. So if you have 2 cards, shouldn't that work? There may be more elegant solutions by now but I think this would get it all in one case. Thanks Tyler ___ Mangled by my iPhone. ___ Tyler Treat Corn Belt Technologies, Inc. tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.commailto:tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com ___ On Jun 1, 2015, at 3:53 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) li...@packetflux.commailto:li...@packetflux.com wrote: I guess you could call the functionality I'm looking for more of the Repeater or Mesh operation, but with NAT in the middle. I.E. today you can, add a virtual AP to a Mikrotik device, so it looks like two devices. I'm looking for the functionality where you can add both a 'wireless AP' and 'client bridge' to the same device. Yes, I know all about the whole 'speed getting slower with WDS/mess issue, etc.), but in this case it doesn't really matter since the traffic is going to be next to nothing. It seems that most hardware and/or drivers will only permit you to be in AP or Client mode. Like I said, I swear I've seen a device which actually works in both at the same time with the same radio - either that or some small device which has two radios in it. Otherwise, I'll just go the separate AP and client bridge route. -forrest On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Ether1/poe in pulls DHCP and gets your Internet bridge1 (ether2/wlan0) is 172.16.0.1/24http://172.16.0.1/24 and gets NATed What are you missing? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) li...@packetflux.commailto:li...@packetflux.com wrote: Maybe. I'm actually probably going to buy one of those and the mAP just to play with. I have some ideas. I swear I've seen something which was designed to connect to a hotspot, then NAT the hotspot connection and deliver it through both AP and wired modes. You know, so you could connect your wired and wireless devices on what appears to be a single connection. I probably need 2 (usable) or 3 (great) Ethernet ports. -forrest On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Can you use this and a POE switch? http://routerboard.com/RBmAP2n Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) li...@packetflux.commailto:li...@packetflux.com wrote: Question for those of you who deal with WiFi devices a lot more than I do: I am in the market for a small WiFi access point which I can use primarily to connect a small Ethernet network to wireless devices (tablets, phones). This is a trade show application - aka 2-3 Ethernet demo devices attached via WiFi. I'm looking for small, light, and although battery would be nice occasionally, wall power is a must, even if it is just leave it plugged into the charger while operating. I'm going to be flying with this device so I don't want something large and clunky. Bonus for a device which will also act as a wifi client/nat router at the same time aka act as a WISP client AND at the same time act as an AP. Not sure if this exists or is even possible with current hardware. If not, if there's a teensy wisp client out there with ethernet for this type of application, feel free to point me there... My fallback position is probably a RB951, although the new hAP light product is intriguing (not sure if it is even shipping yet). -- Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc. Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 forre...@imach.commailto:forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.comhttp://www.packetflux.com/ [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons/linkedin.png]http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons/facebook.png] http://facebook.com/packetflux [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons/twitter.png] http://twitter.com/@packetflux -- Forrest Christian CEO,
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
Downgrade firmware, or I'm pretty sure you need to drive to the other end (or use a backup link) to change it. Don't use beta firmware on production links... (I understand using beta firmware is often required to get the cheap Ubiquiti equipment working well, but that's another discussion). On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: does anybody know a trick to get a radio set to client that is using wpa2-tkip to connect to this AP that will only do none, wpa-aes and wpa2-aes. I dont know why the link was set up tkip, but apparently this beta firmware wont let you use it On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
The newer production firmwares don't allow it either. WPA2-AES offloads the encryption to a dedicated processor or something like that, so it does not affect the performance of the radio. It seems like that is what I read. We use it on all of our links anyway so it wasn't a change for us. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com wrote: Downgrade firmware, or I'm pretty sure you need to drive to the other end (or use a backup link) to change it. Don't use beta firmware on production links... (I understand using beta firmware is often required to get the cheap Ubiquiti equipment working well, but that's another discussion). On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: does anybody know a trick to get a radio set to client that is using wpa2-tkip to connect to this AP that will only do none, wpa-aes and wpa2-aes. I dont know why the link was set up tkip, but apparently this beta firmware wont let you use it On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
I changed it to WPA2 AES and rebooted it a few times it eventually let the other side connect. Is it backward compatible and I was just too impatient? I dont like running beta, Im not all that fond of running UBNT, but cheap whores are always there when you need them. The problem boils down to poor network management on my part, that WPA tkip should not have been configured on that link, I dont know why it was, I should be fired, so I can go work at mcdonalds, make more money, and get fat too. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote: The newer production firmwares don't allow it either. WPA2-AES offloads the encryption to a dedicated processor or something like that, so it does not affect the performance of the radio. It seems like that is what I read. We use it on all of our links anyway so it wasn't a change for us. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com wrote: Downgrade firmware, or I'm pretty sure you need to drive to the other end (or use a backup link) to change it. Don't use beta firmware on production links... (I understand using beta firmware is often required to get the cheap Ubiquiti equipment working well, but that's another discussion). On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: does anybody know a trick to get a radio set to client that is using wpa2-tkip to connect to this AP that will only do none, wpa-aes and wpa2-aes. I dont know why the link was set up tkip, but apparently this beta firmware wont let you use it On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] Guy wires and signal issuws
I have had APs and BHs shooting straight through them with no noticeable difference. On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 8:18 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: when we asked about this on our licensed link we were told probably not, but that it potentially could, dependent on size, distance, etc about a railing. But it was pointed out that at that kind of investment is it worth potentially having unfix-able issues over something fairly trivial like a couple feet where optional. Ours was on a mast, so we went with a taller mast plan and more ballast per the spec sheet. On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Craig House cr...@totalhighspeed.net wrote: I have shot right into them before and dont seem to have enough issue with it to notice a problem. Craig -- *From: *Darin Steffl darin.ste...@mnwifi.com *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Monday, June 1, 2015 6:08:08 PM *Subject: *[AFMUG] Guy wires and signal issuws If any of you have backhaul on guyed towers, will the wires ever affect the signal strength on licensed or unlicensed paths? I'm just wondering how much signal we lose if the guy wire is in our wireless path out and if it being closer to the antenna makes it worse than if the wire is further out. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
I don’t think that job at McDonalds is going to be there much longer. They are pretty tired of being asked to pay silly wages for a job that teenagers should be doing again. [kiosk]http://rightwingnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/kiosk.jpg From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 7:53 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT I changed it to WPA2 AES and rebooted it a few times it eventually let the other side connect. Is it backward compatible and I was just too impatient? I dont like running beta, Im not all that fond of running UBNT, but cheap whores are always there when you need them. The problem boils down to poor network management on my part, that WPA tkip should not have been configured on that link, I dont know why it was, I should be fired, so I can go work at mcdonalds, make more money, and get fat too. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.commailto:jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote: The newer production firmwares don't allow it either. WPA2-AES offloads the encryption to a dedicated processor or something like that, so it does not affect the performance of the radio. It seems like that is what I read. We use it on all of our links anyway so it wasn't a change for us. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.commailto:cstann...@gmail.com wrote: Downgrade firmware, or I'm pretty sure you need to drive to the other end (or use a backup link) to change it. Don't use beta firmware on production links... (I understand using beta firmware is often required to get the cheap Ubiquiti equipment working well, but that's another discussion). On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.commailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: does anybody know a trick to get a radio set to client that is using wpa2-tkip to connect to this AP that will only do none, wpa-aes and wpa2-aes. I dont know why the link was set up tkip, but apparently this beta firmware wont let you use it On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.commailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
even better, ill be unemployed so I wont be job locked and can pursue my poetry Roses are red Violets are blue Go to hell On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net wrote: I don’t think that job at McDonalds is going to be there much longer. They are pretty tired of being asked to pay silly wages for a job that teenagers should be doing again. [image: kiosk] http://rightwingnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/kiosk.jpg *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy /sarcasm *Sent:* Tuesday, June 2, 2015 7:53 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT I changed it to WPA2 AES and rebooted it a few times it eventually let the other side connect. Is it backward compatible and I was just too impatient? I dont like running beta, Im not all that fond of running UBNT, but cheap whores are always there when you need them. The problem boils down to poor network management on my part, that WPA tkip should not have been configured on that link, I dont know why it was, I should be fired, so I can go work at mcdonalds, make more money, and get fat too. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote: The newer production firmwares don't allow it either. WPA2-AES offloads the encryption to a dedicated processor or something like that, so it does not affect the performance of the radio. It seems like that is what I read. We use it on all of our links anyway so it wasn't a change for us. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com wrote: Downgrade firmware, or I'm pretty sure you need to drive to the other end (or use a backup link) to change it. Don't use beta firmware on production links... (I understand using beta firmware is often required to get the cheap Ubiquiti equipment working well, but that's another discussion). On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: does anybody know a trick to get a radio set to client that is using wpa2-tkip to connect to this AP that will only do none, wpa-aes and wpa2-aes. I dont know why the link was set up tkip, but apparently this beta firmware wont let you use it On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
I agree that the “cheap whores” comment is both the most politically incorrect and the funniest thing I’ve seen this morning. Kudos. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Colin Stanners Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 8:13 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT I'm not all that fond of running UBNT, but cheap whores are always there when you need them. I should be fired, so I can go work at mcdonalds, make more money, and get fat too. Also recently: if they're going to splice themselves, at least they're using a quality product to do it wrong Is anyone still keeping a list of Steve quotes? When perusing the messages from this list I often search for certain posters who send out the most informative posts in terms of technology, business or history (and there's a lot! off the top of my head: 3 Chucks / Rory / Ken / Daniel / Gino / 2 Pauls / Forrest / Eric and many more names that I forget)... and Steve. Insightful and hilarious POV. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:52 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.commailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: I changed it to WPA2 AES and rebooted it a few times it eventually let the other side connect. Is it backward compatible and I was just too impatient? I dont like running beta, Im not all that fond of running UBNT, but cheap whores are always there when you need them. The problem boils down to poor network management on my part, that WPA tkip should not have been configured on that link, I dont know why it was, I should be fired, so I can go work at mcdonalds, make more money, and get fat too. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.commailto:jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote: The newer production firmwares don't allow it either. WPA2-AES offloads the encryption to a dedicated processor or something like that, so it does not affect the performance of the radio. It seems like that is what I read. We use it on all of our links anyway so it wasn't a change for us. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.commailto:cstann...@gmail.com wrote: Downgrade firmware, or I'm pretty sure you need to drive to the other end (or use a backup link) to change it. Don't use beta firmware on production links... (I understand using beta firmware is often required to get the cheap Ubiquiti equipment working well, but that's another discussion). On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.commailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: does anybody know a trick to get a radio set to client that is using wpa2-tkip to connect to this AP that will only do none, wpa-aes and wpa2-aes. I dont know why the link was set up tkip, but apparently this beta firmware wont let you use it On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.commailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
You can run at the higher Modulation types with TKIP this is not a UBNT only thing most 802.11 hardware requires you to have AES to get them. On 6/2/2015 9:48 AM, Jeremy wrote: The newer production firmwares don't allow it either. WPA2-AES offloads the encryption to a dedicated processor or something like that, so it does not affect the performance of the radio. It seems like that is what I read. We use it on all of our links anyway so it wasn't a change for us. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com mailto:cstann...@gmail.com wrote: Downgrade firmware, or I'm pretty sure you need to drive to the other end (or use a backup link) to change it. Don't use beta firmware on production links... (I understand using beta firmware is often required to get the cheap Ubiquiti equipment working well, but that's another discussion). On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: does anybody know a trick to get a radio set to client that is using wpa2-tkip to connect to this AP that will only do none, wpa-aes and wpa2-aes. I dont know why the link was set up tkip, but apparently this beta firmware wont let you use it On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
But then you'll miss out on the getting fat part... On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:07 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: even better, ill be unemployed so I wont be job locked and can pursue my poetry Roses are red Violets are blue Go to hell On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net wrote: I don’t think that job at McDonalds is going to be there much longer. They are pretty tired of being asked to pay silly wages for a job that teenagers should be doing again. [image: kiosk] http://rightwingnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/kiosk.jpg *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy /sarcasm *Sent:* Tuesday, June 2, 2015 7:53 AM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT I changed it to WPA2 AES and rebooted it a few times it eventually let the other side connect. Is it backward compatible and I was just too impatient? I dont like running beta, Im not all that fond of running UBNT, but cheap whores are always there when you need them. The problem boils down to poor network management on my part, that WPA tkip should not have been configured on that link, I dont know why it was, I should be fired, so I can go work at mcdonalds, make more money, and get fat too. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote: The newer production firmwares don't allow it either. WPA2-AES offloads the encryption to a dedicated processor or something like that, so it does not affect the performance of the radio. It seems like that is what I read. We use it on all of our links anyway so it wasn't a change for us. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com wrote: Downgrade firmware, or I'm pretty sure you need to drive to the other end (or use a backup link) to change it. Don't use beta firmware on production links... (I understand using beta firmware is often required to get the cheap Ubiquiti equipment working well, but that's another discussion). On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: does anybody know a trick to get a radio set to client that is using wpa2-tkip to connect to this AP that will only do none, wpa-aes and wpa2-aes. I dont know why the link was set up tkip, but apparently this beta firmware wont let you use it On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
I'm not all that fond of running UBNT, but cheap whores are always there when you need them. I should be fired, so I can go work at mcdonalds, make more money, and get fat too. Also recently: if they're going to splice themselves, at least they're using a quality product to do it wrong Is anyone still keeping a list of Steve quotes? When perusing the messages from this list I often search for certain posters who send out the most informative posts in terms of technology, business or history (and there's a lot! off the top of my head: 3 Chucks / Rory / Ken / Daniel / Gino / 2 Pauls / Forrest / Eric and many more names that I forget)... and Steve. Insightful and hilarious POV. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:52 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: I changed it to WPA2 AES and rebooted it a few times it eventually let the other side connect. Is it backward compatible and I was just too impatient? I dont like running beta, Im not all that fond of running UBNT, but cheap whores are always there when you need them. The problem boils down to poor network management on my part, that WPA tkip should not have been configured on that link, I dont know why it was, I should be fired, so I can go work at mcdonalds, make more money, and get fat too. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote: The newer production firmwares don't allow it either. WPA2-AES offloads the encryption to a dedicated processor or something like that, so it does not affect the performance of the radio. It seems like that is what I read. We use it on all of our links anyway so it wasn't a change for us. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com wrote: Downgrade firmware, or I'm pretty sure you need to drive to the other end (or use a backup link) to change it. Don't use beta firmware on production links... (I understand using beta firmware is often required to get the cheap Ubiquiti equipment working well, but that's another discussion). On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: does anybody know a trick to get a radio set to client that is using wpa2-tkip to connect to this AP that will only do none, wpa-aes and wpa2-aes. I dont know why the link was set up tkip, but apparently this beta firmware wont let you use it On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
I think Edgar Allen Poe just rolled over in his grave. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 8:07 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT even better, ill be unemployed so I wont be job locked and can pursue my poetry Roses are red Violets are blue Go to hell On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.netmailto:r...@triadwireless.net wrote: I don’t think that job at McDonalds is going to be there much longer. They are pretty tired of being asked to pay silly wages for a job that teenagers should be doing again. [kiosk]http://rightwingnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/kiosk.jpg From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.commailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 7:53 AM To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT I changed it to WPA2 AES and rebooted it a few times it eventually let the other side connect. Is it backward compatible and I was just too impatient? I dont like running beta, Im not all that fond of running UBNT, but cheap whores are always there when you need them. The problem boils down to poor network management on my part, that WPA tkip should not have been configured on that link, I dont know why it was, I should be fired, so I can go work at mcdonalds, make more money, and get fat too. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.commailto:jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote: The newer production firmwares don't allow it either. WPA2-AES offloads the encryption to a dedicated processor or something like that, so it does not affect the performance of the radio. It seems like that is what I read. We use it on all of our links anyway so it wasn't a change for us. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.commailto:cstann...@gmail.com wrote: Downgrade firmware, or I'm pretty sure you need to drive to the other end (or use a backup link) to change it. Don't use beta firmware on production links... (I understand using beta firmware is often required to get the cheap Ubiquiti equipment working well, but that's another discussion). On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.commailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: does anybody know a trick to get a radio set to client that is using wpa2-tkip to connect to this AP that will only do none, wpa-aes and wpa2-aes. I dont know why the link was set up tkip, but apparently this beta firmware wont let you use it On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.commailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
+1! Thank you, Brett A Mansfield On Jun 2, 2015, at 9:04 AM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net wrote: I don’t think that job at McDonalds is going to be there much longer. They are pretty tired of being asked to pay silly wages for a job that teenagers should be doing again. image001.jpg From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 7:53 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT I changed it to WPA2 AES and rebooted it a few times it eventually let the other side connect. Is it backward compatible and I was just too impatient? I dont like running beta, Im not all that fond of running UBNT, but cheap whores are always there when you need them. The problem boils down to poor network management on my part, that WPA tkip should not have been configured on that link, I dont know why it was, I should be fired, so I can go work at mcdonalds, make more money, and get fat too. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote: The newer production firmwares don't allow it either. WPA2-AES offloads the encryption to a dedicated processor or something like that, so it does not affect the performance of the radio. It seems like that is what I read. We use it on all of our links anyway so it wasn't a change for us. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com wrote: Downgrade firmware, or I'm pretty sure you need to drive to the other end (or use a backup link) to change it. Don't use beta firmware on production links... (I understand using beta firmware is often required to get the cheap Ubiquiti equipment working well, but that's another discussion). On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: does anybody know a trick to get a radio set to client that is using wpa2-tkip to connect to this AP that will only do none, wpa-aes and wpa2-aes. I dont know why the link was set up tkip, but apparently this beta firmware wont let you use it On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
I’m not sure if it’s the cheap part or the whores part that bothers him. There’s a joke that ends: “What do you think I am?” “We’ve already established what you are, now we’re just haggling about the price.” From: Rory Conaway Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 10:15 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT I agree that the “cheap whores” comment is both the most politically incorrect and the funniest thing I’ve seen this morning. Kudos. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Colin Stanners Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 8:13 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT I'm not all that fond of running UBNT, but cheap whores are always there when you need them. I should be fired, so I can go work at mcdonalds, make more money, and get fat too. Also recently: if they're going to splice themselves, at least they're using a quality product to do it wrong Is anyone still keeping a list of Steve quotes? When perusing the messages from this list I often search for certain posters who send out the most informative posts in terms of technology, business or history (and there's a lot! off the top of my head: 3 Chucks / Rory / Ken / Daniel / Gino / 2 Pauls / Forrest / Eric and many more names that I forget)... and Steve. Insightful and hilarious POV. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:52 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: I changed it to WPA2 AES and rebooted it a few times it eventually let the other side connect. Is it backward compatible and I was just too impatient? I dont like running beta, Im not all that fond of running UBNT, but cheap whores are always there when you need them. The problem boils down to poor network management on my part, that WPA tkip should not have been configured on that link, I dont know why it was, I should be fired, so I can go work at mcdonalds, make more money, and get fat too. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Jeremy jeremysmi...@gmail.com wrote: The newer production firmwares don't allow it either. WPA2-AES offloads the encryption to a dedicated processor or something like that, so it does not affect the performance of the radio. It seems like that is what I read. We use it on all of our links anyway so it wasn't a change for us. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Colin Stanners cstann...@gmail.com wrote: Downgrade firmware, or I'm pretty sure you need to drive to the other end (or use a backup link) to change it. Don't use beta firmware on production links... (I understand using beta firmware is often required to get the cheap Ubiquiti equipment working well, but that's another discussion). On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: does anybody know a trick to get a radio set to client that is using wpa2-tkip to connect to this AP that will only do none, wpa-aes and wpa2-aes. I dont know why the link was set up tkip, but apparently this beta firmware wont let you use it On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:58 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com wrote: Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
Why would you be using any of those three? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 8:58:26 AM Subject: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
Its got to do with my incompetence. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net wrote: Why would you be using any of those three? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions https://twitter.com/ICSIL Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange https://twitter.com/mdwestix -- *From: *That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Tuesday, June 2, 2015 8:58:26 AM *Subject: *[AFMUG] WTF UBNT Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
If Mike was an emergency room doctor, he would be asking you why did you put a coke bottle up your ass, rather than focusing on how to get it out. From: That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 12:08 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT Its got to do with my incompetence. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net wrote: Why would you be using any of those three? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com -- From: That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 8:58:26 AM Subject: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
Well that way the patient should refrain from doing it again. Get to the root of the problem instead of sweeping the glass under the rug. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote: If Mike was an emergency room doctor, he would be asking you why did you put a coke bottle up your ass, rather than focusing on how to get it out. *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com *Sent:* Tuesday, June 02, 2015 12:08 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT Its got to do with my incompetence. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net wrote: Why would you be using any of those three? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions https://twitter.com/ICSIL Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange https://twitter.com/mdwestix -- *From: *That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Tuesday, June 2, 2015 8:58:26 AM *Subject: *[AFMUG] WTF UBNT Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
it's just scientific curiosity. Someone has to ask. On 6/2/2015 1:12 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: If Mike was an emergency room doctor, he would be asking you why did you put a coke bottle up your ass, rather than focusing on how to get it out. *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com *Sent:* Tuesday, June 02, 2015 12:08 PM *To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT Its got to do with my incompetence. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net mailto:af...@ics-il.net wrote: Why would you be using any of those three? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSILhttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalbhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutionshttps://twitter.com/ICSIL Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com https://www.facebook.com/mdwestixhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchangehttps://twitter.com/mdwestix *From: *That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com *To: *af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com *Sent: *Tuesday, June 2, 2015 8:58:26 AM *Subject: *[AFMUG] WTF UBNT Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT
Hey, the coke bottle was something totally unrelated, I was there for a splinter. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Adam Moffett dmmoff...@gmail.com wrote: it's just scientific curiosity. Someone has to ask. On 6/2/2015 1:12 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: If Mike was an emergency room doctor, he would be asking you why did you put a coke bottle up your ass, rather than focusing on how to get it out. *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com *Sent:* Tuesday, June 02, 2015 12:08 PM *To:* af@afmug.com *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] WTF UBNT Its got to do with my incompetence. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net wrote: Why would you be using any of those three? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions https://twitter.com/ICSIL Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange https://twitter.com/mdwestix -- *From: *That One Guy /sarcasm thatoneguyst...@gmail.com *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Tuesday, June 2, 2015 8:58:26 AM *Subject: *[AFMUG] WTF UBNT Please select a valid Wireless Security. Weak wireless security (WEP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2-TKIP) is not supported any more nice thing to have pop up on a production backhaul that just powercycled. im assuming the link didnt come back up on this old link because its not transmitting? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
