Re: [AFMUG] Safety Policy / Traffic Policy?

2017-10-31 Thread Brian Webster 
Pretty sure Verizon has rules very similar so if you can’t get the Mediacom 
rules try Verizon’s

 

Thank You,

Brian Webster

www.wirelessmapping.com

www.Broadband-Mapping.com

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve Jones
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 12:47 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Safety Policy / Traffic Policy?

 

IF you can lay your hands on mediacom cable companies, it covers all bases, to 
the degree you cant park anywhere you have to back, cones out, i was told they 
even are to avoid left turns 

 

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Jaime Solorza  
wrote:

We are supposed to attend some new OSHA and State of Texas safety training 
soon.   I can share that when we get it.  Maybe Lewis or Tushar or other fellow 
Texans can chime in? 

 

On Oct 31, 2017 10:11 AM, "Ben Royer"  wrote:

Does anyone have pre-drafted Safety Policies?  We have a tower climbing policy 
and workplace policy, but I’m looking to implement a ‘traffic’ safety one.  
Something along the lines of when and where to use Hi-Vis clothing, cones, etc. 
 Anyone have an example you’d share of anything like this?

 

Thank you,
Ben Royer, Operations Manager
Royell Communications, Inc.
217-965-3699   www.royell.net

Re: [AFMUG] Viable/buyable unlicensed 60GHz 1Gbps PtMP

2017-10-31 Thread Mathew Howard 
We've only done PtP Ignitenet so far, but there doesn't appear to be any
shortage of the PtMP gear... I've played with it a bit on the bench, and it
seemed to work fine. The only reason we haven't deployed any of it yet is
because we've been too busy with other stuff.

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Sterling Jacobson 
wrote:

> Local WISPs have tried both and they are either unavailable for purchase
> in quantity, and/or suck in actual practice/usage.
>
>
>
> Has anyone hear actually gotten more than one AP working from either
> company, and is happy with near 1Gbps performance on PtMP spread over an
> area of more than a handful of CPE in a single ‘line’ area?
>
>
>
> I doubt it.
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 31, 2017 4:03 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Viable/buyable unlicensed 60GHz 1Gbps PtMP
>
>
>
> Yes, I thought both of these were already on the market.
>
> On Tuesday, October 31, 2017, Jeff Broadwick - Lists 
> wrote:
>
> Siklu and Ignite.Net.
>
> Jeff Broadwick
> CTIconnect
> 312-205-2519 <(312)%20205-2519> Office
> 574-220-7826 <(574)%20220-7826> Cell
> jbroadw...@cticonnect.com
>
> > On Oct 31, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Sterling Jacobson 
> wrote:
> >
> > It sounds like there isn't any available/viable 60GHz PtMP product yet.
> >
> > Any ideas on who is going to bring out the first readily available 1Gbps
> PtMP product that actually works?
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP Server Redundancy Survey

2017-10-31 Thread Charles Boening 
These guys are worth checking out.

http://www.network1.net/products/dhcpatriot/


It's essentially the same thing Jesse mentioned just in a commercial product 
with some management wrapped around it.  Linux underneath the hood and a basic 
yet functional web UI.  RADIUS integration, RADIUS forwarding, local users, 
etc.  It has captive portal functionality so you can identify what username has 
what IP and MAC address.  You can pre-auth users (xbox/playstation only types 
out there) as well as suspend users with a custom message.  You can do static 
IP as well.  They also have a basic API so you can do some integrations.  We 
supply routers so when we know the MAC we pre-auth the customer.  Makes a more 
seamless experience for the customer.

They support IPv6 as well. 

Happy to answer any questions.  


Charlie






-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 1:00 PM
To: 'af@afmug.com' 
Subject: [AFMUG] DHCP Server Redundancy Survey

I want to do a more flexible/standard setup for my DHCP handouts.

I hand out public IPv4 and IPv6 dual stack to each customer router from two 
main routers on my network.

Is it best to create two redundant DHCP servers instead and use DHCP Relay 
on-net to them?

And how is everyone doing that?

I'm guessing it's probably best to have those two redundant DHCP servers be 
RADIUS controlled so billing systems can easily integrate with them.

Re: [AFMUG] Viable/buyable unlicensed 60GHz 1Gbps PtMP

2017-10-31 Thread Faisal Imtiaz 
Empty vessels make a lot of noise ! 

Emerging Technologies are always going thru changes, trials and 
tribulations 

60Ghz is ready for deployments .. both vendor have decent stable products.. 
and yes, there is rapid developments going on ... next gens are going to be 
awesome !.. 
(Just like everyone's next gen products !) 

:) 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
http://www.snappytelecom.net 

Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 

> From: "Sterling Jacobson" 
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 6:13:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Viable/buyable unlicensed 60GHz 1Gbps PtMP

> Local WISPs have tried both and they are either unavailable for purchase in
> quantity, and/or suck in actual practice/usage.

> Has anyone hear actually gotten more than one AP working from either company,
> and is happy with near 1Gbps performance on PtMP spread over an area of more
> than a handful of CPE in a single ‘line’ area?

> I doubt it.

> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 4:03 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Viable/buyable unlicensed 60GHz 1Gbps PtMP

> Yes, I thought both of these were already on the market.

> On Tuesday, October 31, 2017, Jeff Broadwick - Lists < jeffl...@att.net > 
> wrote:
>> Siklu and Ignite.Net.

>> Jeff Broadwick
>> CTIconnect
>> 312-205-2519 Office
>> 574-220-7826 Cell
>> jbroadw...@cticonnect.com

>> > On Oct 31, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Sterling Jacobson < sterl...@avative.net > 
>> > wrote:

>> > It sounds like there isn't any available/viable 60GHz PtMP product yet.

>>> Any ideas on who is going to bring out the first readily available 1Gbps 
>>> PtMP
>> > product that actually works?

Re: [AFMUG] Viable/buyable unlicensed 60GHz 1Gbps PtMP

2017-10-31 Thread Rory Conaway 
We use both and they work fine.

Rory

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 3:13 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Viable/buyable unlicensed 60GHz 1Gbps PtMP

Local WISPs have tried both and they are either unavailable for purchase in 
quantity, and/or suck in actual practice/usage.

Has anyone hear actually gotten more than one AP working from either company, 
and is happy with near 1Gbps performance on PtMP spread over an area of more 
than a handful of CPE in a single ‘line’ area?

I doubt it.

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 4:03 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Viable/buyable unlicensed 60GHz 1Gbps PtMP

Yes, I thought both of these were already on the market.

On Tuesday, October 31, 2017, Jeff Broadwick - Lists 
> wrote:
Siklu and Ignite.Net.

Jeff Broadwick
CTIconnect
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@cticonnect.com

> On Oct 31, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Sterling Jacobson 
> > wrote:
>
> It sounds like there isn't any available/viable 60GHz PtMP product yet.
>
> Any ideas on who is going to bring out the first readily available 1Gbps PtMP 
> product that actually works?

Re: [AFMUG] DHCP Server Redundancy Survey

2017-10-31 Thread Jesse DuPont 

  
  
Sterling,

When we did DHCP, we did have a pair of centralized servers, both
running ISC DHCP on Linux. The configs on the two servers have to be
nearly identical (except for the declarations about the server ID
and the server role) so I ran an NFS share between them. Each had a
very small, local dhcpd.conf file with the unique portions and then
an include statement for a common file that both servers used for
all their prefixes. The routers would DHCP-RELAY to both servers and
the servers had an algorithm to spread load. In this way, the same
pool was defined on both servers and each knew whether the other
served it or not.

I did not use it for v6-PD, but did for v4 and it worked well.
Failover worked very well, too.

Yes, having the DHCP servers get lease approval from RADIUS would
allow better northbound integration, assuming the billing system
knew which MAC address belonged to which customer.


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Jesse DuPont

  Network
  Architect
  email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net
  Celerity Networks LLC
  Celerity
  Broadband LLC
Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband
  

  

On 10/31/17 1:59 PM, Sterling Jacobson
  wrote:


  I want to do a more flexible/standard setup for my DHCP handouts.

I hand out public IPv4 and IPv6 dual stack to each customer router from two main routers on my network.

Is it best to create two redundant DHCP servers instead and use DHCP Relay on-net to them?

And how is everyone doing that?

I'm guessing it's probably best to have those two redundant DHCP servers be RADIUS controlled so billing systems can easily integrate with them.

Re: [AFMUG] Viable/buyable unlicensed 60GHz 1Gbps PtMP

2017-10-31 Thread Sterling Jacobson 
Local WISPs have tried both and they are either unavailable for purchase in 
quantity, and/or suck in actual practice/usage.

Has anyone hear actually gotten more than one AP working from either company, 
and is happy with near 1Gbps performance on PtMP spread over an area of more 
than a handful of CPE in a single ‘line’ area?

I doubt it.

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 4:03 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Viable/buyable unlicensed 60GHz 1Gbps PtMP

Yes, I thought both of these were already on the market.

On Tuesday, October 31, 2017, Jeff Broadwick - Lists 
> wrote:
Siklu and Ignite.Net.

Jeff Broadwick
CTIconnect
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@cticonnect.com

> On Oct 31, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Sterling Jacobson 
> > wrote:
>
> It sounds like there isn't any available/viable 60GHz PtMP product yet.
>
> Any ideas on who is going to bring out the first readily available 1Gbps PtMP 
> product that actually works?

Re: [AFMUG] Industry Voices—Madden: CBRS will be big | FierceWireless

2017-10-31 Thread Jason McKemie 
This article is completely overlooking the fact that CBRS does not have
nearly as good of NLOS properties as 2.5 and especially the lower bands.
Many of their points are moot given that one caveat.

On Tuesday, October 31, 2017, Jaime Solorza 
wrote:

> http://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/industry-voices-
> madden-cbrs-will-be-big?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTkRBMU5qYzJZV1V4TjJZei
> IsInQiOiJBVnpWdGdPOHczM2pcL3JxTWZuamc2ZEZPV0FqeHV5dlFOWFZaVU
> REWnFadWN1ZkYzQnRtZUdqdFNuc0gxNnczcjlXTFJvYzVuUUM5NCtvTXlKVk
> 40TWNwaVVibFdFUDBhU0xKMk9iVEJjNDdHWFVcLzdqeGlsUTJOYkxyUjNwTW
> JIIn0%3D=27472010_medium=nl_source=internal
>

Re: [AFMUG] Viable/buyable unlicensed 60GHz 1Gbps PtMP

2017-10-31 Thread Jason McKemie 
Yes, I thought both of these were already on the market.

On Tuesday, October 31, 2017, Jeff Broadwick - Lists 
wrote:

> Siklu and Ignite.Net.
>
> Jeff Broadwick
> CTIconnect
> 312-205-2519 Office
> 574-220-7826 Cell
> jbroadw...@cticonnect.com 
>
> > On Oct 31, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Sterling Jacobson  > wrote:
> >
> > It sounds like there isn't any available/viable 60GHz PtMP product yet.
> >
> > Any ideas on who is going to bring out the first readily available 1Gbps
> PtMP product that actually works?
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Viable/buyable unlicensed 60GHz 1Gbps PtMP

2017-10-31 Thread Jeff Broadwick - Lists 
Siklu and Ignite.Net.

Jeff Broadwick
CTIconnect
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@cticonnect.com

> On Oct 31, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Sterling Jacobson  wrote:
> 
> It sounds like there isn't any available/viable 60GHz PtMP product yet.
> 
> Any ideas on who is going to bring out the first readily available 1Gbps PtMP 
> product that actually works?

[AFMUG] Viable/buyable unlicensed 60GHz 1Gbps PtMP

2017-10-31 Thread Sterling Jacobson 
It sounds like there isn't any available/viable 60GHz PtMP product yet.

Any ideas on who is going to bring out the first readily available 1Gbps PtMP 
product that actually works?

[AFMUG] Industry Voices—Madden: CBRS will be big | FierceWireless

2017-10-31 Thread Jaime Solorza 
http://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/industry-voices-madden-cbrs-will-be-big?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTkRBMU5qYzJZV1V4TjJZeiIsInQiOiJBVnpWdGdPOHczM2pcL3JxTWZuamc2ZEZPV0FqeHV5dlFOWFZaVUREWnFadWN1ZkYzQnRtZUdqdFNuc0gxNnczcjlXTFJvYzVuUUM5NCtvTXlKVk40TWNwaVVibFdFUDBhU0xKMk9iVEJjNDdHWFVcLzdqeGlsUTJOYkxyUjNwTWJIIn0%3D=27472010_medium=nl_source=internal

Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch

2017-10-31 Thread Lewis Bergman 
I guess I have some older Ubiquiti cams that don't do 8.2.3 anything. I
ended up buying a passive 24/48 VDC switch from some company in Austin. I
bought them through Amazon.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00PFZV1K8/ref=b2b_gw_d_bia_0_a1_5_p/138-2594050-6732849?ie=UTF8_rd_i=B00PFZV1K8_rd_r=0WVCHNV23Z1KQV78MM5D_rd_w=2KmET_rd_wg=Vgv3X_rd_i=b2b-desktop_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER_rd_r=0WVCHNV23Z1KQV78MM5D_rd_t=ABGateway=0WVCHNV23Z1KQV78MM5D

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:44 AM Steve Jones 
wrote:

> We use the procurves from HP, no issues, depends on what reasonable means.
> The lifetime warranty is nice
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Matt Hoppes <
> mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
>
>> Arg. It happened again.
>>
>> On Oct 31, 2017, at 09:41, Mike Hammett  wrote:
>>
>> Very true.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Midwest Internet Exchange 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The Brothers WISP 
>> 
>>
>>
>> 
>> --
>> *From: *"Matt Hoppes" 
>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, October 31, 2017 8:40:32 AM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch
>>
>> The toughswitch would disagree with you there Mike.
>>
>> On Oct 31, 2017, at 09:38, Adair Winter 
>> wrote:
>>
>> I would. They have TONS of features, it just drives rather poorly.
>> Otherwise it seems like a solid switch. If you really want enterprise grade
>> (which you didn't mention in your first post) I would use HP Procurve
>> (referbed or new, whichever you want to afford)
>>
>> Recently a small local community hospital lost 4 dell switches and we
>> installed 2 edge switches and 2 HP's we had laying around in their place.
>> We may do the whole rest of the network in edges with. (budget concerns)
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Paul McCall  wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmm, have the Edge Switches matured to the point where they can be used
>>> in the enterprise?  I mean, I use the EdgePoint on my tower but our traffic
>>> is very simple IP traffic.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can it be trusted in the Enterprise now?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Adair Winter
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:11 AM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Edge switch is what I would use.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Paul McCall  wrote:
>>>
>>> We need to power 22 UniFi cameras from POE.   What is a good, cost
>>> effective switch for that?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Paul McCall, President
>>>
>>> PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
>>>
>>> 658 Old Dixie Highway
>>> 
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> Vero Beach, FL 32962
>>> 
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> 772-564-6800 <(772)%20564-6800>
>>>
>>> pa...@pdmnet.net
>>>
>>> www.pdmnet.com
>>>
>>> www.floridabroadband.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Adair Winter
>>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
>>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
>>> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
>>> http://www.amarillowireless.net
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Adair Winter
>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
>> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
>> http://www.amarillowireless.net
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

[AFMUG] DHCP Server Redundancy Survey

2017-10-31 Thread Sterling Jacobson 
I want to do a more flexible/standard setup for my DHCP handouts.

I hand out public IPv4 and IPv6 dual stack to each customer router from two 
main routers on my network.

Is it best to create two redundant DHCP servers instead and use DHCP Relay 
on-net to them?

And how is everyone doing that?

I'm guessing it's probably best to have those two redundant DHCP servers be 
RADIUS controlled so billing systems can easily integrate with them.

[AFMUG] Fwd: [Announcements] CBRS: Tuesday Nov. 7 @ 2PM-3PM EST | How You Can Help Meet The Threat

2017-10-31 Thread Sean Heskett 
Hey Steve and gang,

Here's a notice from WISPA about CBRS (3.55GHz-3.7GHz) and what we can do
as a community to help!

thought you'd be interested

-Sean


Begin forwarded message:

*From: *Trina Coffey 
*Subject: **[Announcements] CBRS: Tuesday Nov. 7 @ 2PM-3PM EST | How You
Can Help Meet The Threat*
*Date: *October 31, 2017 at 11:08:22 AM MDT
*To: *announcements 


CBRS:  How You Can Help Meet The Threat

Please join WISPA for a detailed discussion of the FCC’s Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) in the 3550-3700Mhz band, our strategy going forward, and
how our members can help us protect this critical spectrum.

Please plan to attend this webinar Tuesday, Nov. 7th from 2 pm - 3 pm EST.


*Register Now*





*From WISPA.org *




FCC VOTE IS A STEP BACKWARD FOR RURAL BROADBAND, WISPA SAYS

Washington, DC – Federal policies adopted just two years to stimulate
investment in rural broadband networks are now at risk, following a vote
today at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

Read story »

WISPA FACT SHEET ON THE CBRS SPECTRUM CONTROVERSY

The FCC voted October 24th on whether to launch a review of the
pro-small-business, pro-innovation rules for the 3.5 GHz/CBRS spectrum
band, which were adopted unanimously just two years ago. Read WISPA’s fact
sheet.

Read Story »


Facebook


Twitter


LinkedIn


WISPA





WISPA a 501.c6 advocacy organization that promotes the development,
advancement, and unification of the wireless internet service provider
industry.

4417 13th St. #317 Saint Cloud, FL 34769

(c) 2017 All rights reserved.


___
Announcements mailing list
announceme...@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/announcements

Re: [AFMUG] Safety Policy / Traffic Policy?

2017-10-31 Thread Steve Jones 
IF you can lay your hands on mediacom cable companies, it covers all bases,
to the degree you cant park anywhere you have to back, cones out, i was
told they even are to avoid left turns

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Jaime Solorza 
wrote:

> We are supposed to attend some new OSHA and State of Texas safety training
> soon.   I can share that when we get it.  Maybe Lewis or Tushar or other
> fellow Texans can chime in?
>
> On Oct 31, 2017 10:11 AM, "Ben Royer"  wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have pre-drafted Safety Policies?  We have a tower climbing
>> policy and workplace policy, but I’m looking to implement a ‘traffic’
>> safety one.  Something along the lines of when and where to use Hi-Vis
>> clothing, cones, etc.  Anyone have an example you’d share of anything like
>> this?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Ben Royer, Operations Manager
>> Royell Communications, Inc.
>> 217-965-3699 <(217)%20965-3699> www.royell.net
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch

2017-10-31 Thread Steve Jones 
We use the procurves from HP, no issues, depends on what reasonable means.
The lifetime warranty is nice

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:

> Arg. It happened again.
>
> On Oct 31, 2017, at 09:41, Mike Hammett  wrote:
>
> Very true.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> 
> 
> 
> The Brothers WISP 
> 
>
>
> 
> --
> *From: *"Matt Hoppes" 
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Tuesday, October 31, 2017 8:40:32 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch
>
> The toughswitch would disagree with you there Mike.
>
> On Oct 31, 2017, at 09:38, Adair Winter 
> wrote:
>
> I would. They have TONS of features, it just drives rather poorly.
> Otherwise it seems like a solid switch. If you really want enterprise grade
> (which you didn't mention in your first post) I would use HP Procurve
> (referbed or new, whichever you want to afford)
>
> Recently a small local community hospital lost 4 dell switches and we
> installed 2 edge switches and 2 HP's we had laying around in their place.
> We may do the whole rest of the network in edges with. (budget concerns)
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Paul McCall  wrote:
>
>> Hmmm, have the Edge Switches matured to the point where they can be used
>> in the enterprise?  I mean, I use the EdgePoint on my tower but our traffic
>> is very simple IP traffic.
>>
>>
>>
>> Can it be trusted in the Enterprise now?
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Adair Winter
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:11 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch
>>
>>
>>
>> Edge switch is what I would use.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Paul McCall  wrote:
>>
>> We need to power 22 UniFi cameras from POE.   What is a good, cost
>> effective switch for that?
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul McCall, President
>>
>> PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
>>
>> 658 Old Dixie Highway
>> 
>>
>> Vero Beach, FL 32962
>> 
>>
>> 772-564-6800 <(772)%20564-6800>
>>
>> pa...@pdmnet.net
>>
>> www.pdmnet.com
>>
>> www.floridabroadband.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Adair Winter
>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
>> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
>> http://www.amarillowireless.net
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> 
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Safety Policy / Traffic Policy?

2017-10-31 Thread Jaime Solorza 
We are supposed to attend some new OSHA and State of Texas safety training
soon.   I can share that when we get it.  Maybe Lewis or Tushar or other
fellow Texans can chime in?

On Oct 31, 2017 10:11 AM, "Ben Royer"  wrote:

> Does anyone have pre-drafted Safety Policies?  We have a tower climbing
> policy and workplace policy, but I’m looking to implement a ‘traffic’
> safety one.  Something along the lines of when and where to use Hi-Vis
> clothing, cones, etc.  Anyone have an example you’d share of anything like
> this?
>
> Thank you,
> Ben Royer, Operations Manager
> Royell Communications, Inc.
> 217-965-3699 <(217)%20965-3699> www.royell.net
>

Re: [AFMUG] Safety Policy / Traffic Policy?

2017-10-31 Thread Chuck McCown 
No, the cone is purely to force them to walk behind the vehicle when leaving so 
they don’t squish the customer’s kids.  

From: Ben Royer 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:22 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Safety Policy / Traffic Policy?

Thanks,  Do you specify to the employee the distance of cone?  IE: 1’*MPH of 
roadway? or 10’ or anything like that?

Thank you,
Ben Royer, Operations Manager
Royell Communications, Inc.
217-965-3699 www.royell.net

From: Chuck McCown 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 11:15 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Safety Policy / Traffic Policy?

Not sure I have written it down.  If in a public ROW, hard hats and orange 
vests must be worn.
If in a UDOT ROW then amber blinky light on top must be used.

Cones behind the truck at every stop.  

From: Ben Royer 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:11 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: [AFMUG] Safety Policy / Traffic Policy?

Does anyone have pre-drafted Safety Policies?  We have a tower climbing policy 
and workplace policy, but I’m looking to implement a ‘traffic’ safety one.  
Something along the lines of when and where to use Hi-Vis clothing, cones, etc. 
 Anyone have an example you’d share of anything like this?

Thank you,
Ben Royer, Operations Manager
Royell Communications, Inc.
217-965-3699 www.royell.net

Re: [AFMUG] Safety Policy / Traffic Policy?

2017-10-31 Thread Ben Royer 
Thanks,  Do you specify to the employee the distance of cone?  IE: 1’*MPH of 
roadway? or 10’ or anything like that?

Thank you,
Ben Royer, Operations Manager
Royell Communications, Inc.
217-965-3699 www.royell.net

From: Chuck McCown 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 11:15 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Safety Policy / Traffic Policy?

Not sure I have written it down.  If in a public ROW, hard hats and orange 
vests must be worn.
If in a UDOT ROW then amber blinky light on top must be used.

Cones behind the truck at every stop.  

From: Ben Royer 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:11 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: [AFMUG] Safety Policy / Traffic Policy?

Does anyone have pre-drafted Safety Policies?  We have a tower climbing policy 
and workplace policy, but I’m looking to implement a ‘traffic’ safety one.  
Something along the lines of when and where to use Hi-Vis clothing, cones, etc. 
 Anyone have an example you’d share of anything like this?

Thank you,
Ben Royer, Operations Manager
Royell Communications, Inc.
217-965-3699 www.royell.net

Re: [AFMUG] Safety Policy / Traffic Policy?

2017-10-31 Thread Chuck McCown 
Not sure I have written it down.  If in a public ROW, hard hats and orange 
vests must be worn.
If in a UDOT ROW then amber blinky light on top must be used.

Cones behind the truck at every stop.  

From: Ben Royer 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:11 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: [AFMUG] Safety Policy / Traffic Policy?

Does anyone have pre-drafted Safety Policies?  We have a tower climbing policy 
and workplace policy, but I’m looking to implement a ‘traffic’ safety one.  
Something along the lines of when and where to use Hi-Vis clothing, cones, etc. 
 Anyone have an example you’d share of anything like this?

Thank you,
Ben Royer, Operations Manager
Royell Communications, Inc.
217-965-3699 www.royell.net

[AFMUG] Safety Policy / Traffic Policy?

2017-10-31 Thread Ben Royer 
Does anyone have pre-drafted Safety Policies?  We have a tower climbing policy 
and workplace policy, but I’m looking to implement a ‘traffic’ safety one.  
Something along the lines of when and where to use Hi-Vis clothing, cones, etc. 
 Anyone have an example you’d share of anything like this?

Thank you,
Ben Royer, Operations Manager
Royell Communications, Inc.
217-965-3699 www.royell.net

Re: [AFMUG] CRM stock

2017-10-31 Thread Travis Johnson 
CRM is up 3% in just the last three days of trading... earnings report 
on 11/16/2017... could jump another 10% on that day. Still hearing 
rumors of a buy-out by another very large tech company (Google, Oracle, 
etc).


Travis


On 10/26/2017 9:01 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote:

That would be an interesting development

- Original Message -
*From:* Travis Johnson 
*To:* af@afmug.com 
*Sent:* Thursday, October 26, 2017 9:42 AM
*Subject:* [AFMUG] CRM stock

Hi,

There are some rumors on the street that Google or Oracle may be
looking
at purchasing Salesforce (stock: CRM). May be a good, short term
investment... plus the stock has been increasing for the last 3
years. :)

Travis

Re: [AFMUG] OT .'House of Cards' canceled as fallout continues forSpacey - ABC News

2017-10-31 Thread Steve Jones 
This is going to suck, entertainment wise as more of this stuff comes out.
I wish the response from management would be to let the market dictate what
happens to these shows. Hollywood is and always has been full of creepers.
If every claim of harassment results in termination of a series, we will be
relegated to nothing but reruns. Spacey sucks, though, admitting hes a
pedophile, it will be hard to watch his films and I love his acting,
explains that uncomfortable realism in american Beauty though. Im a season
behind on HOC, not sure if I can catch up now without chucking a hammer at
the pedo on the TV.

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Chuck McCown  wrote:

> Billions has to be pretty near the top of my list.  Shameless is there
> too...
>
> *From:* CBB - Jay Fuller
> *Sent:* Monday, October 30, 2017 8:34 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT .'House of Cards' canceled as fallout continues
> forSpacey - ABC News
>
>
> it kept you guessing.
>
> i rank it pretty high - above "scandal" and other abc crap
> but i still rank it below homeland and billionsand below 24 as well
>
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Lewis Bergman
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Sent:* Monday, October 30, 2017 8:43 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT .'House of Cards' canceled as fallout continues
> for Spacey - ABC News
>
>
> I really liked the series
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017, 8:10 PM Jaime Solorza 
> wrote:
>
>> I have no dog in fight...I don't watch it
>>
>> On Oct 30, 2017 6:33 PM, "Lewis Bergman"  wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds like NF already was cancelling so they try to look good with the
>>> opportunity to day this is why. Spacey gets to say he has already been
>>> punished.
>>>
>>> Nobody really gives a crap.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017, 7:13 PM Eric Kuhnke  wrote:
>>>
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Az54_sZ-vc

 On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Jaime Solorza <
 losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have seen posts where you guys like this show...
>
>
> http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory/kevin-
> spacey-slammed-timing-coming-gay-50814017
>


>>>

Re: [AFMUG] Twisted light could make wireless data faster than fiber

2017-10-31 Thread Chuck McCown 
Been reading about this for years.  Takes odd launchers and receivers but more 
importantly, the receiver device must be dead on boresight.  Whether RF or 
optic, the spot you are in the wavefront really matters.  So aiming is much 
more difficult and it is the TX aiming that is the most critical.  

From: Stephen Patrick 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 7:54 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Twisted light could make wireless data faster than fiber

For anyone interested,
The published actual research paper is here:

http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/advances/3/10/e1700552.full.pdf
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/10/e1700552
University of Glasgow is one of the leaders on the project
https://www.gla.ac.uk/news/headline_555908_en.html

Innovations appear to be OAM and tip/tilt adaptive optics.

FSO is certainly a real technology: 
CableFree have 20 years experience in this, and we've seen that some products 
that were/are on the market are certainly less solid than others.
Commercial FSO is mostly used for shorter 1Gbps links in cities these days, and 
ours customer base includes major clients.
FSO does have the advantage of not suffering interference, and genuine 1Gbps 
FDX capacity.

Our own page is
www.cablefree.net/fso for anyone interested -

Best regards
Stephen





On 31 October 2017 at 04:01, Rory Conaway  wrote:

  This has been out for some time.  One guy thinks he can convert it to RF but 
there are many skeptics.



  Rory



  From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
  Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 8:32 PM
  To: af@afmug.com
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Twisted light could make wireless data faster than fiber



  Free space optics has not impressed me yet.  A different variant of free 
space optics doesn't excite me.



  I'll be very happy if they are successful with it.just saying I'm not 
gonna bet on it..





  -- Original Message --

  From: "Jaime Solorza" 

  To: "Animal Farm" 

  Sent: 10/30/2017 7:03:38 PM

  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Twisted light could make wireless data faster than fiber



They tested at one milestill nascent technology...



On Oct 30, 2017 3:24 PM, "Jason McKemie"  
wrote:

Yeah, might work in a lab I suppose.

On Monday, October 30, 2017, Adam Moffett  wrote:

I'm not going to bet on it.



-- Original Message --

From: "Jaime Solorza" 

To: "Animal Farm" 

Sent: 10/30/2017 3:35:33 PM

Subject: [AFMUG] Twisted light could make wireless data faster than fiber



  
https://www.engadget.com/amp/2017/10/29/twisted-light-promises-wireless-data-faster-than-fiber/

Re: [AFMUG] Twisted light could make wireless data faster than fiber

2017-10-31 Thread Stephen Patrick 
For anyone interested,
The published actual research paper is here:

http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/advances/3/10/e1700552.full.pdf
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/10/e1700552
University of Glasgow is one of the leaders on the project
https://www.gla.ac.uk/news/headline_555908_en.html

Innovations appear to be OAM and tip/tilt adaptive optics.

FSO is certainly a real technology:
CableFree have 20 years experience in this, and we've seen that some
products that were/are on the market are certainly less solid than others.
Commercial FSO is mostly used for shorter 1Gbps links in cities these days,
and ours customer base includes major clients.
FSO does have the advantage of not suffering interference, and genuine
1Gbps FDX capacity.

Our own page is
www.cablefree.net/fso for anyone interested -

Best regards
Stephen




On 31 October 2017 at 04:01, Rory Conaway  wrote:

> This has been out for some time.  One guy thinks he can convert it to RF
> but there are many skeptics.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
> *Sent:* Monday, October 30, 2017 8:32 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Twisted light could make wireless data faster than
> fiber
>
>
>
> Free space optics has not impressed me yet.  A different variant of free
> space optics doesn't excite me.
>
>
>
> I'll be very happy if they are successful with it.just saying I'm not
> gonna bet on it..
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
>
> From: "Jaime Solorza" 
>
> To: "Animal Farm" 
>
> Sent: 10/30/2017 7:03:38 PM
>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Twisted light could make wireless data faster than
> fiber
>
>
>
> They tested at one milestill nascent technology...
>
>
>
> On Oct 30, 2017 3:24 PM, "Jason McKemie" 
> wrote:
>
> Yeah, might work in a lab I suppose.
>
> On Monday, October 30, 2017, Adam Moffett  wrote:
>
> I'm not going to bet on it.
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
>
> From: "Jaime Solorza" 
>
> To: "Animal Farm" 
>
> Sent: 10/30/2017 3:35:33 PM
>
> Subject: [AFMUG] Twisted light could make wireless data faster than fiber
>
>
>
> https://www.engadget.com/amp/2017/10/29/twisted-light-
> promises-wireless-data-faster-than-fiber/
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch

2017-10-31 Thread Matt Hoppes 
Arg. It happened again. 

> On Oct 31, 2017, at 09:41, Mike Hammett  wrote:
> 
> Very true.
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange
> 
> The Brothers WISP
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: "Matt Hoppes" 
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 8:40:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch
> 
> The toughswitch would disagree with you there Mike.
> 
> On Oct 31, 2017, at 09:38, Adair Winter  wrote:
> 
> I would. They have TONS of features, it just drives rather poorly. Otherwise 
> it seems like a solid switch. If you really want enterprise grade (which you 
> didn't mention in your first post) I would use HP Procurve (referbed or new, 
> whichever you want to afford)
> 
> Recently a small local community hospital lost 4 dell switches and we 
> installed 2 edge switches and 2 HP's we had laying around in their place. We 
> may do the whole rest of the network in edges with. (budget concerns) 
> 
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Paul McCall  wrote:
>> Hmmm, have the Edge Switches matured to the point where they can be used in 
>> the enterprise?  I mean, I use the EdgePoint on my tower but our traffic is 
>> very simple IP traffic.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Can it be trusted in the Enterprise now?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adair Winter
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:11 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Edge switch is what I would use.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Paul McCall  wrote:
>> 
>> We need to power 22 UniFi cameras from POE.   What is a good, cost effective 
>> switch for that? 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Paul McCall, President
>> 
>> PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
>> 
>> 658 Old Dixie Highway
>> 
>> Vero Beach, FL 32962
>> 
>> 772-564-6800 
>> 
>> pa...@pdmnet.net
>> 
>> www.pdmnet.com
>> 
>> www.floridabroadband.com
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Adair Winter
>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
>> C: 806.231.7180
>> http://www.amarillowireless.net
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
> C: 806.231.7180
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch

2017-10-31 Thread Mike Hammett 
Very true. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




- Original Message -

From: "Matt Hoppes"  
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 8:40:32 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch 



The toughswitch would disagree with you there Mike. 

On Oct 31, 2017, at 09:38, Adair Winter < ada...@amarillowireless.net > wrote: 






I would. They have TONS of features, it just drives rather poorly. Otherwise it 
seems like a solid switch. If you really want enterprise grade (which you 
didn't mention in your first post) I would use HP Procurve (referbed or new, 
whichever you want to afford) 


Recently a small local community hospital lost 4 dell switches and we installed 
2 edge switches and 2 HP's we had laying around in their place. We may do the 
whole rest of the network in edges with. (budget concerns) 



On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Paul McCall < pa...@pdmnet.net > wrote: 





Hmmm, have the Edge Switches matured to the point where they can be used in the 
enterprise? I mean, I use the EdgePoint on my tower but our traffic is very 
simple IP traffic. 

Can it be trusted in the Enterprise now? 

Paul 

From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Adair Winter 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:11 AM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch 


Edge switch is what I would use. 



On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Paul McCall < pa...@pdmnet.net > wrote: 




We need to power 22 UniFi cameras from POE. What is a good, cost effective 
switch for that? 

Paul 

Paul McCall, President 
PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc. 
658 Old Dixie Highway 
Vero Beach, FL 32962 
772-564-6800 
pa...@pdmnet.net 
www.pdmnet.com 
www.floridabroadband.com 









-- 




Adair Winter 
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner 
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 
C: 806.231.7180 
http://www.amarillowireless.net 








-- 





Adair Winter 
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner 
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 
C: 806.231.7180 
http://www.amarillowireless.net

Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch

2017-10-31 Thread Matt Hoppes 
The toughswitch would disagree with you there Mike.

> On Oct 31, 2017, at 09:38, Adair Winter  wrote:
> 
> I would. They have TONS of features, it just drives rather poorly. Otherwise 
> it seems like a solid switch. If you really want enterprise grade (which you 
> didn't mention in your first post) I would use HP Procurve (referbed or new, 
> whichever you want to afford)
> 
> Recently a small local community hospital lost 4 dell switches and we 
> installed 2 edge switches and 2 HP's we had laying around in their place. We 
> may do the whole rest of the network in edges with. (budget concerns) 
> 
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Paul McCall  wrote:
>> Hmmm, have the Edge Switches matured to the point where they can be used in 
>> the enterprise?  I mean, I use the EdgePoint on my tower but our traffic is 
>> very simple IP traffic.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Can it be trusted in the Enterprise now?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adair Winter
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:11 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Edge switch is what I would use.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Paul McCall  wrote:
>> 
>> We need to power 22 UniFi cameras from POE.   What is a good, cost effective 
>> switch for that? 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Paul McCall, President
>> 
>> PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
>> 
>> 658 Old Dixie Highway
>> 
>> Vero Beach, FL 32962
>> 
>> 772-564-6800 
>> 
>> pa...@pdmnet.net
>> 
>> www.pdmnet.com
>> 
>> www.floridabroadband.com
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Adair Winter
>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
>> C: 806.231.7180
>> http://www.amarillowireless.net
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
> C: 806.231.7180
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> 
> 
> 
>

Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch

2017-10-31 Thread Adair Winter 
I would. They have TONS of features, it just drives rather poorly.
Otherwise it seems like a solid switch. If you really want enterprise grade
(which you didn't mention in your first post) I would use HP Procurve
(referbed or new, whichever you want to afford)

Recently a small local community hospital lost 4 dell switches and we
installed 2 edge switches and 2 HP's we had laying around in their place.
We may do the whole rest of the network in edges with. (budget concerns)

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Paul McCall  wrote:

> Hmmm, have the Edge Switches matured to the point where they can be used
> in the enterprise?  I mean, I use the EdgePoint on my tower but our traffic
> is very simple IP traffic.
>
>
>
> Can it be trusted in the Enterprise now?
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Adair Winter
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:11 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch
>
>
>
> Edge switch is what I would use.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Paul McCall  wrote:
>
> We need to power 22 UniFi cameras from POE.   What is a good, cost
> effective switch for that?
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> Paul McCall, President
>
> PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
>
> 658 Old Dixie Highway
> 
>
> Vero Beach, FL 32962
> 
>
> 772-564-6800 <(772)%20564-6800>
>
> pa...@pdmnet.net
>
> www.pdmnet.com
>
> www.floridabroadband.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> 
>
>
>



-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
http://www.amarillowireless.net

Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch

2017-10-31 Thread Mike Hammett 
A switch is a switch. Not much to go wrong. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




- Original Message -

From: "Paul McCall"  
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 8:13:24 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch 



Hmmm, have the Edge Switches matured to the point where they can be used in the 
enterprise? I mean, I use the EdgePoint on my tower but our traffic is very 
simple IP traffic. 

Can it be trusted in the Enterprise now? 

Paul 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adair Winter 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:11 AM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch 


Edge switch is what I would use. 



On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Paul McCall < pa...@pdmnet.net > wrote: 




We need to power 22 UniFi cameras from POE. What is a good, cost effective 
switch for that? 

Paul 

Paul McCall, President 
PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc. 
658 Old Dixie Highway 
Vero Beach, FL 32962 
772-564-6800 
pa...@pdmnet.net 
www.pdmnet.com 
www.floridabroadband.com 









-- 




Adair Winter 
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner 
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 
C: 806.231.7180 
http://www.amarillowireless.net

Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch

2017-10-31 Thread Paul McCall 
Hmmm, have the Edge Switches matured to the point where they can be used in the 
enterprise?  I mean, I use the EdgePoint on my tower but our traffic is very 
simple IP traffic.

Can it be trusted in the Enterprise now?

Paul

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adair Winter
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:11 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch

Edge switch is what I would use.

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Paul McCall 
> wrote:
We need to power 22 UniFi cameras from POE.   What is a good, cost effective 
switch for that?

Paul

Paul McCall, President
PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
658 Old Dixie 
Highway
Vero Beach, FL 
32962
772-564-6800
pa...@pdmnet.net
www.pdmnet.com
www.floridabroadband.com





--

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net
[https://docs.google.com/a/amarillowireless.net/uc?id=0B-KeaiwIRBHEQl9leFFvVjZuWmc=download]

Re: [AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch

2017-10-31 Thread Adair Winter 
Edge switch is what I would use.

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Paul McCall  wrote:

> We need to power 22 UniFi cameras from POE.   What is a good, cost
> effective switch for that?
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> Paul McCall, President
>
> PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
>
> 658 Old Dixie Highway
> 
>
> Vero Beach, FL 32962
> 
>
> 772-564-6800 <(772)%20564-6800>
>
> pa...@pdmnet.net
>
> www.pdmnet.com
>
> www.floridabroadband.com
>
>
>
>
>



-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net

[AFMUG] Reasonably priced 24 port POE switch

2017-10-31 Thread Paul McCall 
We need to power 22 UniFi cameras from POE.   What is a good, cost effective 
switch for that?

Paul

Paul McCall, President
PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
658 Old Dixie Highway
Vero Beach, FL 32962
772-564-6800
pa...@pdmnet.net
www.pdmnet.com
www.floridabroadband.com