Re: [AFMUG] power supplies for packetflux

2016-10-10 Thread George Skorup
O. Wait. I haven't used the 10/100 version of the 
PowerInjector+Sync. Forrest is smart so I bet he put jumpers for each 
pin on the spare pairs. I had the GigE version on my brain which you 
obviously can't do the split pair power scheme with.


On 10/10/2016 8:35 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
The syncinjectors are discontinued per the website. the Powerinjector 
10/100 says it will power the 320, but you are saying it wont sync it 
(not that sync actually works on 320)



On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 8:08 PM, George Skorup > wrote:


PowerInjector + Sync will not work with 320 and 430. The 320/430
SyncInjector is the only one that provides the split-pair power
and sync-over-power for those radios. BUT... you can use a regular
SyncInjector (Rev H will take 48 volts) or a PowerInjector+Sync if
you do the opposite of what Cambium recommends for the 450i on a
CMM4 in 48 volt mode. Just swap pins 5 & 7 at one end. No 320/430
specific injector required. I'm sure many have done this in a
pinch. Your monkeys will need to remember what you did though. So
the wise choice might be to make nice bright red or orange pin
swap adapter pigtails.

And just run the ePMP GPS APs on 48/56 volts and not even worry
about 24 vs 29.5. Keep in mind with the PowerInjector+Sync, you
have A and B power rails. So you can run 24/29.5 and 48/56 on the
same injector. You select A or B per port. Pretty awesome. Can't
wait for the new versions with more ports.


On 10/10/2016 7:54 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:

It looks like I need the PowerInjector Plus Sync - 10/100 Version
for the 320 and the powerinjector-plus-sync-gigabit-version will
work for 450 epmp and fsk, if this is not accurate please correct
me.

I recall the 24 volt P/S was problematic for the EPMP so 30V is
preferred and will power epmp, fsk and 450 without issue.
Packetflux doesnt have the 30 volt, whats a decent 30v power
supply for 4 radios at a time?

The packetflux 48 volt power supply if I recall correctly is fine
for running 320, correct me if im wrong again please.

-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see

your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of
the team.





--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your 
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.




Re: [AFMUG] power supplies for packetflux

2016-10-10 Thread That One Guy /sarcasm
The syncinjectors are discontinued per the website. the Powerinjector
10/100 says it will power the 320, but you are saying it wont sync it (not
that sync actually works on 320)


On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 8:08 PM, George Skorup  wrote:

> PowerInjector + Sync will not work with 320 and 430. The 320/430
> SyncInjector is the only one that provides the split-pair power and
> sync-over-power for those radios. BUT... you can use a regular SyncInjector
> (Rev H will take 48 volts) or a PowerInjector+Sync if you do the opposite
> of what Cambium recommends for the 450i on a CMM4 in 48 volt mode. Just
> swap pins 5 & 7 at one end. No 320/430 specific injector required. I'm sure
> many have done this in a pinch. Your monkeys will need to remember what you
> did though. So the wise choice might be to make nice bright red or orange
> pin swap adapter pigtails.
>
> And just run the ePMP GPS APs on 48/56 volts and not even worry about 24
> vs 29.5. Keep in mind with the PowerInjector+Sync, you have A and B power
> rails. So you can run 24/29.5 and 48/56 on the same injector. You select A
> or B per port. Pretty awesome. Can't wait for the new versions with more
> ports.
>
>
> On 10/10/2016 7:54 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
>
> It looks like I need the PowerInjector Plus Sync - 10/100 Version for the
> 320 and the powerinjector-plus-sync-gigabit-version will work for 450
> epmp and fsk, if this is not accurate please correct me.
>
> I recall the 24 volt P/S was problematic for the EPMP so 30V is preferred
> and will power epmp, fsk and 450 without issue. Packetflux doesnt have the
> 30 volt, whats a decent 30v power supply for 4 radios at a time?
>
> The packetflux 48 volt power supply if I recall correctly is fine for
> running 320, correct me if im wrong again please.
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>
>
>


-- 
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.


Re: [AFMUG] power supplies for packetflux

2016-10-10 Thread George Skorup
PowerInjector + Sync will not work with 320 and 430. The 320/430 
SyncInjector is the only one that provides the split-pair power and 
sync-over-power for those radios. BUT... you can use a regular 
SyncInjector (Rev H will take 48 volts) or a PowerInjector+Sync if you 
do the opposite of what Cambium recommends for the 450i on a CMM4 in 48 
volt mode. Just swap pins 5 & 7 at one end. No 320/430 specific injector 
required. I'm sure many have done this in a pinch. Your monkeys will 
need to remember what you did though. So the wise choice might be to 
make nice bright red or orange pin swap adapter pigtails.


And just run the ePMP GPS APs on 48/56 volts and not even worry about 24 
vs 29.5. Keep in mind with the PowerInjector+Sync, you have A and B 
power rails. So you can run 24/29.5 and 48/56 on the same injector. You 
select A or B per port. Pretty awesome. Can't wait for the new versions 
with more ports.


On 10/10/2016 7:54 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
It looks like I need the PowerInjector Plus Sync - 10/100 Version for 
the 320 and the powerinjector-plus-sync-gigabit-version will work for 
450 epmp and fsk, if this is not accurate please correct me.


I recall the 24 volt P/S was problematic for the EPMP so 30V is 
preferred and will power epmp, fsk and 450 without issue. Packetflux 
doesnt have the 30 volt, whats a decent 30v power supply for 4 radios 
at a time?


The packetflux 48 volt power supply if I recall correctly is fine for 
running 320, correct me if im wrong again please.


--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your 
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.