RE: [agi] WordNet and NARS

2004-02-06 Thread Ben Goertzel


hi
 I'm also extremely interested in biological applications, but
 maybe your choice is biased by your (emotional) preference for
 science and is actually not optimal / rational.

I'm sure it's rational; of course I'm not sure it's *optimal*!

Business is not a very exact science, and one is always making choices based
on intuitive assessments of a large number of complexly interrelated
factors.  Optimality is really never an issue.

A key point is that I was able to think of a lot of concrete ways to use AI
to make marketable products in the biology domain.  This is because I'm a
scientist and have a good intuition for such things.  So the basis of our
company Biomind LLC is not just our Novamente AI system but -- just as
importantly -- a host of other scientific ideas I had that bridge the gap
between Novamente's general capabilities and the specific problems involved
in the bio domain.

Having knowledge of and intuition for the domain of application is probably
THE MOST IMPORTANT THING in doing practical AI applications --- be they
commercial or academic, be they proto-AGI or pure-narrow-AI.

By looking at
 some employment statistics, I guesstimate the most profitable
 AI applications should be retail and food industries, and slowly
 work its way up more complex areas (eg health care such as robotic
 surgery or medical expert systems etc), and then even more complex
 ones such as those requiring natural language understanding, and
 other cognitive abilities.

But this kind of analysis is so extremely coarse that I'm not sure it's
useful at all.

The pragmatics of selling products into these different industries needs to
be taken into account.  I really don't know a good way to sell AI in the
retail and food industries, for example; whereas I do know how to sell
AI-driven bioinformatics tools into the biopharma market.

Sure, you could try to sell AI-based datamining to Wal-mart and the like.
But I'm not sure this is really a better business proposition than selling
AI-based tools to biopharma?  One advantage of selling to biopharma is that
the people involved are scientists and hence are generally more open to
radical ideas than average business-types would be.

If anyone on this list has good connections with the datamining-related
people at Walmart or other major retail chains, I'd be happy to meet with
them and pitch them proto-AGI-based-datamining.  I'd be happy to take a
temporary (paid) contract to analyze some data for them, just to show them
what our software can do on their data ;-)

 Unless you think AGI does not need this bottom-up approach...

I think there are many paths to AGI, not just one

And I think that NO business application is going to take us all the way to
AGI -- doing business apps can help us develop various aspects of our
proto-AGI systems, but ultimately you've got to teach a baby mind and that
is a research project not a business project, due to the very many
uncertainties involved.

We are doing business apps like Biomind because they're fascinating 
valuable in themselves (extending life, curing diseases, etc.), because they
help us develop and test various *parts* of our AI systems, and because they
pay our salaries ;-)  But it's a mistake to try to map the business-app
goals too closely onto the AGI goals -- although it's great when the two
harmonize, as is somewhat the case with our Biomind work right now...

ben

---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[agi] Down Under

2004-02-06 Thread Peter Voss
I'll be visiting Sydney, Brisbane, Perth and Auckland later this month.

I anyone Down Under wants to meet me to chat about the Singularity, AGI,
etc. drop me a line  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Peter




---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[agi] Within-cell computation in biological neural systems??

2004-02-06 Thread Philip Sutton
Does anyone have an up-to-date fix on how much computation occurs 
(if any) within-cells (as opposed to the traditional neural net level) that 
are part of biolgical brain systems?  especially in the case of 
animals that have a premium placed on the number of neurones they 
can support (eg. limited by size, weight or energy supply compared to 
the need for computational capacity).

Cheers, Philip

---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [agi] Within-cell computation in biological neural systems??

2004-02-06 Thread Ben Goertzel

This is sort of a vague question, Philip.

Clearly there is a lot of complex information-processing going on inside
cells --- DNA is a kind of complex computer program, and its genes code for
proteins, some of which collectively form a kind of assembler and compiler
for this program, etc.

However, the idea that this information processing plays a direct role in
human-mind-level information processing, is another hypothesis entirely.  As
you probably know, Stuart Hameroff has proposed that molecular-biology
information processing in the microtubules in the cell walls of neurons, are
a key part of human cognition.  Personally, I doubt it, but  In the same
vein, I read a book a while back in which two guys named Jibu and Yasue
tried to follow up on Hameroff's ideas with a detailed theory of the
cognitive role of quantum nonlocality effects in water megamolecules in the
brain.  There has probably been more work along these lines recently, but,
it's definitely highly speculative and not accepted by the bulk of the
scientific community.

-- Ben G

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Behalf Of Philip Sutton
 Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 12:22 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [agi] Within-cell computation in biological neural systems??


 Does anyone have an up-to-date fix on how much computation occurs
 (if any) within-cells (as opposed to the traditional neural net
 level) that
 are part of biolgical brain systems?  especially in the case of
 animals that have a premium placed on the number of neurones they
 can support (eg. limited by size, weight or energy supply compared to
 the need for computational capacity).

 Cheers, Philip

 ---
 To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate
 your subscription,
 please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]