DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the Stuffs: April 1st-7th edition

[Kenyon Prater]

How would people feel about a rule that either:
1) Automatically takes newly created contents from a facility that a player
owns or is contractually allowed to take from and is located on they same
land that e is located at?
2) Players can designate some text as a command that they automatically do
when new resources are created, treated as if they had sent that message to
a public forum in the instant after the resources were created.

Obviously there's a lot of room for issues of who's command executed first
in both of these, but especially once all of us start having multiple
facilities, it might become somewhat spammy to have threads claiming
resources every week.

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Kenyon Prater  wrote:

> I take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1).
>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs part 2

[Reuben Staley]

Aris was at (-1, -1)
CB was at (+1, -1)

I'm sorry I didn't publish reports. I probably should have. I knew
people would get mad eventually because of my tardiness. But I figured
more people would also get mad if I published anything in a report.
Everyone would only get mad at everyone else because the rules
surrounding Cartography were disputed and only recently patched. I'll
hopefully be able to report soon.

On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Gaelan Steele  wrote:
> Does anyone know where Aris and CB were when this happened? I’m trying to 
> update my report, but the cartogrophor’s report hasn’t been updated in a long 
> time.
>
> Gaelan
>
>> On Mar 19, 2018, at 7:37 AM, Cuddle Beam  wrote:
>>
>> I take everything from where I'm standing.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:18 AM, Aris Merchant <
>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I take everything from the mine where I'm standing.
>>>
>>> -Aris
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:17 PM Kenyon Prater 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 If the orchard at (-1, 1) is nonempty I take all the contents of the
 orchard at (-1, 1).

 On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Aris Merchant <
 thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following:
>
> Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0)
> Destroy 1 apple to move to (-1, -1)
> Take all the contents of the mine at (-1,-1)
>
> I likewise intend to respect EFDoA, and encourage everyone else to do
>>> the
> same.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Kenyon Prater 
> wrote:
>> I take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1).
>>
>> I intend to respect EFDoA and will hold off on claiming anything else
> until
>> 4 days has passed.
>

>>>
>



-- 
Trigon

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs part 2

[Aris Merchant]

I was still at (-1, -1).

-Aris

On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 3:54 PM Gaelan Steele  wrote:

> Does anyone know where Aris and CB were when this happened? I’m trying to
> update my report, but the cartogrophor’s report hasn’t been updated in a
> long time.
>
> Gaelan
>
> > On Mar 19, 2018, at 7:37 AM, Cuddle Beam  wrote:
> >
> > I take everything from where I'm standing.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:18 AM, Aris Merchant <
> > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I take everything from the mine where I'm standing.
> >>
> >> -Aris
> >>
> >> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:17 PM Kenyon Prater 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> If the orchard at (-1, 1) is nonempty I take all the contents of the
> >>> orchard at (-1, 1).
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Aris Merchant <
> >>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
>  If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following:
> 
>  Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0)
>  Destroy 1 apple to move to (-1, -1)
>  Take all the contents of the mine at (-1,-1)
> 
>  I likewise intend to respect EFDoA, and encourage everyone else to do
> >> the
>  same.
> 
>  -Aris
> 
>  On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Kenyon Prater  >
>  wrote:
> > I take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1).
> >
> > I intend to respect EFDoA and will hold off on claiming anything else
>  until
> > 4 days has passed.
> 
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs part 2

[Gaelan Steele]

Does anyone know where Aris and CB were when this happened? I’m trying to 
update my report, but the cartogrophor’s report hasn’t been updated in a long 
time.

Gaelan

> On Mar 19, 2018, at 7:37 AM, Cuddle Beam  wrote:
> 
> I take everything from where I'm standing.
> 
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:18 AM, Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I take everything from the mine where I'm standing.
>> 
>> -Aris
>> 
>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:17 PM Kenyon Prater 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> If the orchard at (-1, 1) is nonempty I take all the contents of the
>>> orchard at (-1, 1).
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Aris Merchant <
>>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
 If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following:
 
 Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0)
 Destroy 1 apple to move to (-1, -1)
 Take all the contents of the mine at (-1,-1)
 
 I likewise intend to respect EFDoA, and encourage everyone else to do
>> the
 same.
 
 -Aris
 
 On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Kenyon Prater 
 wrote:
> I take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1).
> 
> I intend to respect EFDoA and will hold off on claiming anything else
 until
> 4 days has passed.
 
>>> 
>> 

DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs part 2

[Kenyon Prater]

If the orchard at (-1, 1) is nonempty I take all the contents of the
orchard at (-1, 1).

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following:
>
> Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0)
> Destroy 1 apple to move to (-1, -1)
> Take all the contents of the mine at (-1,-1)
>
> I likewise intend to respect EFDoA, and encourage everyone else to do the
> same.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Kenyon Prater 
> wrote:
> > I take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1).
> >
> > I intend to respect EFDoA and will hold off on claiming anything else
> until
> > 4 days has passed.
>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs

[Reuben Staley]

Preserved public facilities are supposed to help new and impoverished
players get some starting resources even if they don't have their own
facilities. Also to give all players an additional easy source of income.
Unpreserved public facilites are basically no man's land where this kind of
stuff is completely allowed.

El 4 mar. 2018 19:19, "Kenyon Prater"  escribió:

> I'd be willing to just contract it to a redistribution contract or just
> transfer it to people or something. I agree it's pretty unfair. What was
> the goal of the public facilities? Maybe we need to redo them to better
> achieve that goal
>
> On Mar 4, 2018 6:03 PM, "Aris Merchant"  gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Sigh. We really need to do something to make the distribution of
> assets fair again. I mean, we can't take everything away, because
> there's no rule violation involved, but we could at least even it out
> a bit. The asset distribution is so unfair at the moment that I'm
> worried about the long term impact. Opinions?
>
> -Aris
>
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 5:55 PM Kenyon Prater 
> wrote:
> >
> > If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following:
> >
> > Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0)
> > Destroy 1 apple to move to (-1, -1)
> > Take all the contents of the mine at (-1,-1)
> > Destroy 1 apple to move to (0, -1)
> > Destroy 1 apple to move to (1, -1)
> > Take all the contents of the farm at (1, -1)
> > Destroy two apples to move to (1, 0)
> > Destroy one apple to move to (1, 1)
> > Take all the contents of the mine at (1, 1)
> > Destroy one apple to move to (0, 1)
> > Destroy one apple to move to (-1, 1)
> > Take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1)
>

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs

[Kenyon Prater]

I'd be willing to just contract it to a redistribution contract or just
transfer it to people or something. I agree it's pretty unfair. What was
the goal of the public facilities? Maybe we need to redo them to better
achieve that goal

On Mar 4, 2018 6:03 PM, "Aris Merchant" 
wrote:

Sigh. We really need to do something to make the distribution of
assets fair again. I mean, we can't take everything away, because
there's no rule violation involved, but we could at least even it out
a bit. The asset distribution is so unfair at the moment that I'm
worried about the long term impact. Opinions?

-Aris

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 5:55 PM Kenyon Prater  wrote:
>
> If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following:
>
> Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0)
> Destroy 1 apple to move to (-1, -1)
> Take all the contents of the mine at (-1,-1)
> Destroy 1 apple to move to (0, -1)
> Destroy 1 apple to move to (1, -1)
> Take all the contents of the farm at (1, -1)
> Destroy two apples to move to (1, 0)
> Destroy one apple to move to (1, 1)
> Take all the contents of the mine at (1, 1)
> Destroy one apple to move to (0, 1)
> Destroy one apple to move to (-1, 1)
> Take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1)

DIS: Re: BUS: Nabbing the stuffs

[Aris Merchant]

Sigh. We really need to do something to make the distribution of
assets fair again. I mean, we can't take everything away, because
there's no rule violation involved, but we could at least even it out
a bit. The asset distribution is so unfair at the moment that I'm
worried about the long term impact. Opinions?

-Aris

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 5:55 PM Kenyon Prater  wrote:
>
> If the mine at (-1, -1) is nonempty, then I do the following:
>
> Destroy 1 apple to move from (0, 0) to (-1, 0)
> Destroy 1 apple to move to (-1, -1)
> Take all the contents of the mine at (-1,-1)
> Destroy 1 apple to move to (0, -1)
> Destroy 1 apple to move to (1, -1)
> Take all the contents of the farm at (1, -1)
> Destroy two apples to move to (1, 0)
> Destroy one apple to move to (1, 1)
> Take all the contents of the mine at (1, 1)
> Destroy one apple to move to (0, 1)
> Destroy one apple to move to (-1, 1)
> Take all the contents of the orchard at (-1, 1)