DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Corrected Distribution of Proposals 7548-7586
Switches are self-ratifying in general. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 10, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote: I vote: 7548 10 O Ienpw IIIStandardized election days FOR 7549 2 25 O Walker Recruitment Sanity PRESENT 7550 30 O omd Democratic Democracy Only NO VOTE 7551 20 O omd Ministry fix and buff PRESENT 7552 20 O omd Freshdated FOR 7585 30 O omd Remove useless vote protection NO VOTE 7554 30 O omd Trading card cleanup FOR 7586 30 O omd Self-ratification, victory, office changes AGAINST; as far as I can tell, switches are not self-ratifying in general, so amending Rule 2139 thus would cause Citizenship to no longer be self-ratifying 7556 10 O omd Kirby I AGAINST 7557 10 O omd too extraordinary PRESENT 7558 3 30 O Walker Walker's excellent* Agoran red-tape .. removal proposal** FOR 7559 3 30 O Walker humbug AGAINST 7561 10 O Machiavelli 沖縄の線の修理 FOR (but oops, I defined path wrong; I'll propose to fix that a few minutes ago) 7563 10 O omd Clarify inaccuracy ban FOR 7566 1 20 O Walker because nobody cares PRESENT 7567 20 O Walker Civil service reform FOR 7568 30 O omd, etc.Agora pulls a B + some ratifications FOR 7569 30 O omd, etc.Disinterest NO VOTE; why would we want to do that? 7570 20 O Walker May as well settle Distributability, once .. and for all. FOR 7571 3.1 0 O Fool Agora pulls a B FOR, I guess 7572 3.1 0 O Fool Ratify the Dishonourable Assessor's report ENDORSE ais523 7573 30 O Machiavelli Seriously, Cretans, get out of here FOR 7574 10 O Machiavelli Unturtling FOR 7575 3 30 O Walker Summer Holidays ENDORSE ais523 7576 3.1 0 O Fool Ratify the Honourable Officers' reports ENDORSE ais523 7577 30 O Fool Player endorsement for self-ratification ENDORSE ais523 7578 3.1 0 O Fool Ratify the Dishonourable Registrar's .. report AGAINST 7579 20 O omd Infraction fix FOR 7580 20 O omd Stupid grammar fix PRESENT 7581 10 O Max Schutz Speak your mind PRESENT; there are probably more effective ways of making the ruleset accessible to people with visual impairments. I like Walker's Semantic Logical Ruleset. 7582 10 O Ienpw IIIAn Act to Increase Judicial Oversight FOR 7583 30 O omd meh ENDORSE ais523 7584 30 O omd The Logic That Was Retroactively Clarified AGAINST, for the same reasons as last time (I voted AGAINST this last time, didn't I?) ―Machiavelli
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Corrected Distribution of Proposals 7548-7586
On 7 August 2013 14:21, Benjamin Schultz ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote: On Props. 7548-7586, I vote ENDORSE Murphy. It seems unlikely that Murphy will vote.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Corrected Distribution of Proposals 7548-7586
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.comwrote: On 7 August 2013 14:21, Benjamin Schultz ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote: On Props. 7548-7586, I vote ENDORSE Murphy. It seems unlikely that Murphy will vote. Did e go inactive or AFK? Would you like to convince me to endorse someone else? -- OscarMeyr
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Corrected Distribution of Proposals 7548-7586
On 7 August 2013 15:13, Benjamin Schultz ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 August 2013 14:21, Benjamin Schultz ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote: On Props. 7548-7586, I vote ENDORSE Murphy. It seems unlikely that Murphy will vote. Did e go inactive or AFK? Would you like to convince me to endorse someone else? E's not Rules-inactive, but e hasn't played much recently, and I don't think e's been voting. Your votes will evaluate to PRESENT if Murphy doesn't vote so it doesn't matter quorum-wise. As for someone else, well, the player I appear to agree with the most on the current distribution is me :)
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Corrected Distribution of Proposals 7548-7586
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.comwrote: On 7 August 2013 15:13, Benjamin Schultz ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 August 2013 14:21, Benjamin Schultz ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote: On Props. 7548-7586, I vote ENDORSE Murphy. It seems unlikely that Murphy will vote. Did e go inactive or AFK? Would you like to convince me to endorse someone else? E's not Rules-inactive, but e hasn't played much recently, and I don't think e's been voting. Your votes will evaluate to PRESENT if Murphy doesn't vote so it doesn't matter quorum-wise. As for someone else, well, the player I appear to agree with the most on the current distribution is me :) Feel free to convince me to change my vote, then. :) -- OscarMeyr
