DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6724-6727

2010-05-21 Thread Sean Hunt

On 05/21/2010 12:05 PM, ais523 wrote:

I vote AGAINST each of those proposals. Wooble pointed out on IRC that
they stop non-senators voting.



This is by design; it's intended to be a new form of defense against 
dictatorship scams, since it also makes the proposal 'democratic' (not 
actually since it needs to change the voting limits of non-senators). I 
don't believe there's a significant concern of a Senator takeover, 
either, as most active players are Senators anyways and any 3 Senators, 
armed with a member of the Government, can filibuster any proposal. If 
every member of the Government is onside (or too lazy to do anything), 
odds are good that the coalition could pass the proposal without this 
rule anyways.


-coppro


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6724-6727

2010-05-21 Thread comex
On Friday, May 21, 2010, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk
 I retract my votes on distributed proposals 6724-6727, and vote FOR
 (times my voting limit) on them.

Me too.


Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6724-6727

2010-05-21 Thread ais523
On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 14:36 -0400, comex wrote:
 On Friday, May 21, 2010, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk
  I retract my votes on distributed proposals 6724-6727, and vote FOR
  (times my voting limit) on them.
 
 Me too.

NttPF.

-- 
ais523