DIS: Re: BUS: blotting
On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 at 21:29, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote: > > As do I. Ineffective, I don't have any left.
DIS: Re: BUS: blotting
On Sun, 8 Mar 2020 at 21:14, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 1:45 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-business > wrote: > > > > I expunge a blot from myself. > > I do likewise. > > -Aris Aw, thanks. -Alexis
DIS: Re: BUS: Blotting Proposal
Sigh. I had something a bit broader than this that’s almost ready to post, and I just hadn’t gotten to looking it over and sending it out. Sorry about that. I wouldn’t suggest retracting this. I’ll post mine and we’ll see what the response is like. Again, my apologies. -Aris On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:22 PM D. Margaux wrote: > I submit and pend the following proposal: > > > Title: Criminal Justice Adjustments Act > AI: 2 > Author: D Margaux > > [Purpose is to streamline and clarify the conditions under > which fines can be imposed; make it possible to impose > fines after 14 days when a finger is pointed within 14 days; > and to clarify the time period for imposing fines when it is > based on the failure to meet a deadline] > > Amend Rule 2531 (Referee Accountability) to replace this text: > > "Any attempt to levy a fine is INEFFECTIVE if it does not include > (1) value of the fine in blots, (2) the name of the person being > fined (the perp), and (3) the specific reason for the fine, or if > it attempts to levy a fine on a person for an action or inaction > which e (more likely than not) did not commit, or if it attempts > to levy a fine for an action or inaction which is not prohibited > by law, or if it attempts to levy a fine with a value which is > blatantly and obviously unsuited to the conduct which constitutes > the reason for its levy or to the person to which it is being > levied, or if it is made more than 14 days after the conduct > constituting the reason for the fine, or if it attempts to levy a > fine to a player who has already been levied a fine for the > conduct constituting the reason for the levy, or if it attempts to > levy a fine on a zombie for an action that its master performed on > its behalf." > > with this text: > > "Any attempt to levy a fine is INEFFECTIVE if: > > (1) it does not include value of the fine in blots, the name > of the person being fined (the perp), and the specific > reason for the fine; > > (2) it attempts to levy a fine on a person for an action or > inaction which e (more likely than not) did not commit; > > (3) it attempts to levy a fine for an action or inaction > which is not prohibited by law; > > (4) it attempts to levy a fine with a value that is blatantly > and obviously unsuited to the conduct which constitutes > the reason for its levy or to the person on whom it is > being levied; > > (5) it attempts to levy a fine (i) by summary judgement more > than 14 days after the action constituting the reason > for the fine or (ii) based upon the investigation of > of a Finger that had been Pointed more than 14 days > after the action constituting the reason for the fine; > > (6) it attempts to levy a fine on a player for failing to > take an action within the time period set by the Rules > and that time period had expired (i) more than 14 days > prior to the attempted fine, if the attempted fine is > imposed by summary judgement or (ii) more than 14 days > prior to the Pointed Finger, if the fine is imposed > based on an investigation of such Finger; > > (7) it attempts to levy a fine on a player who has already > been fined for the conduct constituting the reason for > the levy; or > > (8) it attempts to levy a fine on a zombie for an action > that its master performed on its behalf." > > -- > D. Margaux >
DIS: Re: BUS: Blotting Proposal
The eighth point should be eir behalf, zombies are still people. On Wed., 24 Oct. 2018, 11:22 am D. Margaux, wrote: > I submit and pend the following proposal: > > > Title: Criminal Justice Adjustments Act > AI: 2 > Author: D Margaux > > [Purpose is to streamline and clarify the conditions under > which fines can be imposed; make it possible to impose > fines after 14 days when a finger is pointed within 14 days; > and to clarify the time period for imposing fines when it is > based on the failure to meet a deadline] > > Amend Rule 2531 (Referee Accountability) to replace this text: > > "Any attempt to levy a fine is INEFFECTIVE if it does not include > (1) value of the fine in blots, (2) the name of the person being > fined (the perp), and (3) the specific reason for the fine, or if > it attempts to levy a fine on a person for an action or inaction > which e (more likely than not) did not commit, or if it attempts > to levy a fine for an action or inaction which is not prohibited > by law, or if it attempts to levy a fine with a value which is > blatantly and obviously unsuited to the conduct which constitutes > the reason for its levy or to the person to which it is being > levied, or if it is made more than 14 days after the conduct > constituting the reason for the fine, or if it attempts to levy a > fine to a player who has already been levied a fine for the > conduct constituting the reason for the levy, or if it attempts to > levy a fine on a zombie for an action that its master performed on > its behalf." > > with this text: > > "Any attempt to levy a fine is INEFFECTIVE if: > > (1) it does not include value of the fine in blots, the name > of the person being fined (the perp), and the specific > reason for the fine; > > (2) it attempts to levy a fine on a person for an action or > inaction which e (more likely than not) did not commit; > > (3) it attempts to levy a fine for an action or inaction > which is not prohibited by law; > > (4) it attempts to levy a fine with a value that is blatantly > and obviously unsuited to the conduct which constitutes > the reason for its levy or to the person on whom it is > being levied; > > (5) it attempts to levy a fine (i) by summary judgement more > than 14 days after the action constituting the reason > for the fine or (ii) based upon the investigation of > of a Finger that had been Pointed more than 14 days > after the action constituting the reason for the fine; > > (6) it attempts to levy a fine on a player for failing to > take an action within the time period set by the Rules > and that time period had expired (i) more than 14 days > prior to the attempted fine, if the attempted fine is > imposed by summary judgement or (ii) more than 14 days > prior to the Pointed Finger, if the fine is imposed > based on an investigation of such Finger; > > (7) it attempts to levy a fine on a player who has already > been fined for the conduct constituting the reason for > the levy; or > > (8) it attempts to levy a fine on a zombie for an action > that its master performed on its behalf." > > -- > D. Margaux >
