Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Regardless of the Scam Result

2020-06-23 Thread nch via agora-discussion
On 6/23/20 1:59 PM, omd via agora-business wrote:
> I submit, but do not (as I think I cannot) pend, the following proposal:

You ought to have a Pending Card which you could pay to make a pendant 
if you so choose.

-- 
nch
Prime Minister, Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager




Re: DIS: Regardless of the Scam Result

2020-06-23 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion


On 6/23/2020 10:21 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/23/20 12:16 PM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
>> For what it's worth, I think that "manually" skunking this scam by proposal 
>> would be a reasonable way to resolve the circumstance; I doubt either the 
>> scamsters, nor the other players, would have a problem with the resulting 
>> gamestate.
> 
> Yea I'm fine with that. We're already hoping to keep gamestate pretty 
> stable when this triggers.
> 

Sounds perfectly reasonable (again I wasn't at all annoyed personally was
just pointing out how it might affect things based on my own thinking
since the scam broke)


Re: DIS: Regardless of the Scam Result

2020-06-23 Thread nch via agora-discussion
On 6/23/20 12:16 PM, Alex Smith via agora-discussion wrote:
> For what it's worth, I think that "manually" skunking this scam by proposal 
> would be a reasonable way to resolve the circumstance; I doubt either the 
> scamsters, nor the other players, would have a problem with the resulting 
> gamestate.

Yea I'm fine with that. We're already hoping to keep gamestate pretty 
stable when this triggers.

-- 
nch
Prime Minister, Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager




Re: DIS: Regardless of the Scam Result

2020-06-23 Thread Alex Smith via agora-discussion
 On Tuesday, 23 June 2020, 16:08:36 GMT+1, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion 
 wrote:
> ok. I'll go ahead and plan for a week for something that's so uncertain
> that I might as well just wait it out. no, not gonna. That's my personal
> attitude and like it or not, somewhere in Economics 101 is the fact that
> uncertainty suppresses economies, even on a toy scale. Saying "hey you
> can just change your strategy every time we get into scam/bug mode" is the
> kind of thing that frustrates people and killed land, and spaceships.
> Also consider your role: one of the things that soured us more quickly on
> shinies is that o [the designer] pulled at least one scam off the bat and
> maybe two and we got tired of that... hey here's something for your thesis

We should really bring back some sort of skunking rule. (For people who don't 
know about it: the "skunk" rule was invoked immediately after a scam caused a 
win, and cancelled any economic reset as a consequence of the win, expect that 
the winning scammers' economic values were zeroed. I forget what exact 
mechanism was used to declare a win a skunk, but it was probably Agoran consent 
or something similar. The win still counted, though. It probably could have 
itself been scammed, but AFAIR, nobody did.)

It strikes me as a fair way to allow scams to occur, but without allowing them 
into interfere with the rest of the gameplay. That way, people seeing an 
opportunity to win don't end up accidentally ruining the game for everyone else.

For what it's worth, I think that "manually" skunking this scam by proposal 
would be a reasonable way to resolve the circumstance; I doubt either the 
scamsters, nor the other players, would have a problem with the resulting 
gamestate.

-- 
ais523  


Re: DIS: Regardless of the Scam Result

2020-06-23 Thread Ed Strange via agora-discussion
I personally am happy to write a proposal to reset the economy (everyone's
assets) to the point they were right before the scam happens. so that
trading in the interim will still be rewarded.

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 1:09 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:

>
> On 6/23/2020 7:57 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On 6/23/20 9:53 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> >> On 6/23/2020 7:49 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> >>> This scam doesn't actually grind out economy to a hault, or at least it
> >>> doesn't have to. When someone wins by victory points, cards and
> products
> >>> get reset but coins, blots, and assets created by contracts don't. That
> >>> means there should still be incentive to buy/sell/trade. If it looks
> >>> like the scam is likely to succeed I recommend using what you have how
> >>> you can and selling off the rest.
> >>>
> >> Trade what? coins, blots and contract assets were all the pre-Sets
> >> economy.  not much to trade there.
> >>
> >> If I wasn't thinking "ok here's my next trade, and my next, and then I
> >> have these products" that might be a comfort.  As it is, it's more like
> >> "well might as well hold on to coins and there's no point in investing
> in
> >> any cards and products except maybe expunge a blot if I've got one".
> >>
> >> -G.
> >>
> > Trade Cards/Products to someone who can use them before the reset, in
> > exchange for coins which you'll still have after. If you have extra
> > pendants and someone wants to pend some things, they may be willing to
> > buy. The urgency of you ditching the extras presumably will make them
> > cheaper now than they will be post reset.
>
> ok.  I'll go ahead and plan for a week for something that's so uncertain
> that I might as well just wait it out. no, not gonna. That's my personal
> attitude and like it or not, somewhere in Economics 101 is the fact that
> uncertainty suppresses economies, even on a toy scale.  Saying "hey you
> can just change your strategy every time we get into scam/bug mode" is the
> kind of thing that frustrates people and killed land, and spaceships.
> Also consider your role:  one of the things that soured us more quickly on
> shinies is that o [the designer] pulled at least one scam off the bat and
> maybe two and we got tired of that... hey here's something for your thesis
>
> [ps.  not annoyed at all with the scam attempt, if it sounds like I am,
> just pointing out some realities of past consequences to keep in mind if
> you want the system to thrive through this].
>
> -G.
>
>

-- 
>From R. Lee


Re: DIS: Regardless of the Scam Result

2020-06-23 Thread nch via agora-discussion
On 6/23/20 10:06 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> ok.  I'll go ahead and plan for a week for something that's so uncertain
> that I might as well just wait it out. no, not gonna. That's my personal
> attitude and like it or not, somewhere in Economics 101 is the fact that
> uncertainty suppresses economies, even on a toy scale.

Uncertainty in an economic system encourages people to liquidate 
uncertain assets for certain ones, that's exactly what I'm suggesting 
people do. If you don't want to that's fine, I'm just pointing out that 
some assets have continuity and people might want to consider that in 
their play this week.

This is also not a scam specific to this economy, it pre-existed with 
the high score win condition. Nothing added or amended by Sets changed 
this scam.

-- 
nch
Prime Minister, Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager




Re: DIS: Regardless of the Scam Result

2020-06-23 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion


On 6/23/2020 7:57 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/23/20 9:53 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/23/2020 7:49 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> This scam doesn't actually grind out economy to a hault, or at least it
>>> doesn't have to. When someone wins by victory points, cards and products
>>> get reset but coins, blots, and assets created by contracts don't. That
>>> means there should still be incentive to buy/sell/trade. If it looks
>>> like the scam is likely to succeed I recommend using what you have how
>>> you can and selling off the rest.
>>>
>> Trade what? coins, blots and contract assets were all the pre-Sets
>> economy.  not much to trade there.
>>
>> If I wasn't thinking "ok here's my next trade, and my next, and then I
>> have these products" that might be a comfort.  As it is, it's more like
>> "well might as well hold on to coins and there's no point in investing in
>> any cards and products except maybe expunge a blot if I've got one".
>>
>> -G.
>>
> Trade Cards/Products to someone who can use them before the reset, in 
> exchange for coins which you'll still have after. If you have extra 
> pendants and someone wants to pend some things, they may be willing to 
> buy. The urgency of you ditching the extras presumably will make them 
> cheaper now than they will be post reset.

ok.  I'll go ahead and plan for a week for something that's so uncertain
that I might as well just wait it out. no, not gonna. That's my personal
attitude and like it or not, somewhere in Economics 101 is the fact that
uncertainty suppresses economies, even on a toy scale.  Saying "hey you
can just change your strategy every time we get into scam/bug mode" is the
kind of thing that frustrates people and killed land, and spaceships.
Also consider your role:  one of the things that soured us more quickly on
shinies is that o [the designer] pulled at least one scam off the bat and
maybe two and we got tired of that... hey here's something for your thesis

[ps.  not annoyed at all with the scam attempt, if it sounds like I am,
just pointing out some realities of past consequences to keep in mind if
you want the system to thrive through this].

-G.



Re: DIS: Regardless of the Scam Result

2020-06-23 Thread nch via agora-discussion
On 6/23/20 9:53 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On 6/23/2020 7:49 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>> This scam doesn't actually grind out economy to a hault, or at least it
>> doesn't have to. When someone wins by victory points, cards and products
>> get reset but coins, blots, and assets created by contracts don't. That
>> means there should still be incentive to buy/sell/trade. If it looks
>> like the scam is likely to succeed I recommend using what you have how
>> you can and selling off the rest.
>>
> Trade what? coins, blots and contract assets were all the pre-Sets
> economy.  not much to trade there.
>
> If I wasn't thinking "ok here's my next trade, and my next, and then I
> have these products" that might be a comfort.  As it is, it's more like
> "well might as well hold on to coins and there's no point in investing in
> any cards and products except maybe expunge a blot if I've got one".
>
> -G.
>
Trade Cards/Products to someone who can use them before the reset, in 
exchange for coins which you'll still have after. If you have extra 
pendants and someone wants to pend some things, they may be willing to 
buy. The urgency of you ditching the extras presumably will make them 
cheaper now than they will be post reset.

-- 
nch
Prime Minister, Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager




Re: DIS: Regardless of the Scam Result

2020-06-23 Thread nch via agora-discussion
On 6/23/20 9:56 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion 
wrote:
> I just noticed something about Rule 2624: After a reset, officers can't
> grant new cards if they had done so in the same month but prior to the
> reset. Is this by design?

No, unintended/expected. I just didn't think about it but it'd be a good 
fix.

-- 
nch
Prime Minister, Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager




Re: DIS: Regardless of the Scam Result

2020-06-23 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
On 6/23/20 10:53 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> 
> On 6/23/2020 7:49 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
>> This scam doesn't actually grind out economy to a hault, or at least it 
>> doesn't have to. When someone wins by victory points, cards and products 
>> get reset but coins, blots, and assets created by contracts don't. That 
>> means there should still be incentive to buy/sell/trade. If it looks 
>> like the scam is likely to succeed I recommend using what you have how 
>> you can and selling off the rest.
>>
> 
> Trade what? coins, blots and contract assets were all the pre-Sets
> economy.  not much to trade there.
> 
> If I wasn't thinking "ok here's my next trade, and my next, and then I
> have these products" that might be a comfort.  As it is, it's more like
> "well might as well hold on to coins and there's no point in investing in
> any cards and products except maybe expunge a blot if I've got one".
> 
> -G.
> 

I just noticed something about Rule 2624: After a reset, officers can't
grant new cards if they had done so in the same month but prior to the
reset. Is this by design?

-- 

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, Herald, Referee, Tailor, Pirate
Champion, Badge of the Great Agoran Revival, Badge of the Salted Earth


Re: DIS: Regardless of the Scam Result

2020-06-23 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion


On 6/23/2020 7:49 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> This scam doesn't actually grind out economy to a hault, or at least it 
> doesn't have to. When someone wins by victory points, cards and products 
> get reset but coins, blots, and assets created by contracts don't. That 
> means there should still be incentive to buy/sell/trade. If it looks 
> like the scam is likely to succeed I recommend using what you have how 
> you can and selling off the rest.
> 

Trade what? coins, blots and contract assets were all the pre-Sets
economy.  not much to trade there.

If I wasn't thinking "ok here's my next trade, and my next, and then I
have these products" that might be a comfort.  As it is, it's more like
"well might as well hold on to coins and there's no point in investing in
any cards and products except maybe expunge a blot if I've got one".

-G.



DIS: Regardless of the Scam Result

2020-06-23 Thread nch via agora-discussion
This scam doesn't actually grind out economy to a hault, or at least it 
doesn't have to. When someone wins by victory points, cards and products 
get reset but coins, blots, and assets created by contracts don't. That 
means there should still be incentive to buy/sell/trade. If it looks 
like the scam is likely to succeed I recommend using what you have how 
you can and selling off the rest.

-- 
nch
Prime Minister, Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager