Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro
2009/6/7 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com: Ed Murphy wrote: BobTHJ wrote: Please! Trim these messages before responding. Or at least quote using so my QuoteCollapse add-on will work. I do. It's the GMail guys who use tabs. The GMail huys who use RTF. I've turned that off. -- -Tiger
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 17:36, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote: Aaron Goldfein wrote: ~~~ Far to much quoting done here, omitted for brevity ~~~ This appeal seems to have been ignored by the CotC. NoV em for it, then. Please! Trim these messages before responding. BobTHJ
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro
BobTHJ wrote: Please! Trim these messages before responding. Or at least quote using so my QuoteCollapse add-on will work.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro
Ed Murphy wrote: BobTHJ wrote: Please! Trim these messages before responding. Or at least quote using so my QuoteCollapse add-on will work. I do. It's the GMail guys who use tabs.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro
ais523 wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 09:18 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 23:05, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I appeal this judgment.
Since I spent a Note to remove one of your Rests in the belief that 3
Rests was excessive, I would ask that, if the judgment is overruled,
remanded, or reassigned, you repay me in some manner.
I have no way of enforcing this, but I will note if you do not.
If the judgment is overruled or re-assigned then it was never valid,
which means the rests were never created, and therefore your spending
notes to destroy one was invalid.
Err, no. You can't retroactively prevent a judgement having happened.
Instead, the appeals panel has to destroy the rests by announcement;
which might be problematic, given that they no longer all exist. (Rule
1504; incidentally, {Wooble, Rodlen, Tiger} have failed for over a week
to meet this SHALL, but the rule forgets to specify a time limit. I
wonder what recourse I have in this case? Probably, a proposal to fix
the rule; I'll do that.)
Proto-proto: If an entity is required to destroy a Rest in the
possession of a player with no Rests, it CAN by announcement create a
Note of a specified pitch and a Rest in the possession of that player.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
ais523 wrote:
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 09:18 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 23:05, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I appeal this judgment.
Since I spent a Note to remove one of your Rests in the belief that 3
Rests was excessive, I would ask that, if the judgment is overruled,
remanded, or reassigned, you repay me in some manner.
I have no way of enforcing this, but I will note if you do not.
If the judgment is overruled or re-assigned then it was never valid,
which means the rests were never created, and therefore your spending
notes to destroy one was invalid.
Err, no. You can't retroactively prevent a judgement having happened.
Instead, the appeals panel has to destroy the rests by announcement;
which might be problematic, given that they no longer all exist. (Rule
1504; incidentally, {Wooble, Rodlen, Tiger} have failed for over a week
to meet this SHALL, but the rule forgets to specify a time limit. I
wonder what recourse I have in this case? Probably, a proposal to fix
the rule; I'll do that.)
Proto-proto: If an entity is required to destroy a Rest in the
possession of a player with no Rests, it CAN by announcement create a
Note of a specified pitch and a Rest in the possession of that player.
Or just allow negative rests.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro
On Sun, 31 May 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote: Proto-proto: If an entity is required to destroy a Rest in the possession of a player with no Rests, it CAN by announcement create a Note of a specified pitch and a Rest in the possession of that player. Or just allow negative rests. We've had in the past tried to keep currencies a lot like real things and in that sense we're rather medieval; there's precedents that there's no such thing as a negative currency, that you can't magically transmute fungible currencies into each other; that you can't decrease a currency by a negative amount thereby increasing it etc. At least that's some varied precedents it hasn't come up in a bit. -G.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 23:05, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote: Aaron Goldfein wrote: I appeal this judgment. Since I spent a Note to remove one of your Rests in the belief that 3 Rests was excessive, I would ask that, if the judgment is overruled, remanded, or reassigned, you repay me in some manner. I have no way of enforcing this, but I will note if you do not. If the judgment is overruled or re-assigned then it was never valid, which means the rests were never created, and therefore your spending notes to destroy one was invalid. BobTHJ
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 09:18 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 23:05, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I appeal this judgment.
Since I spent a Note to remove one of your Rests in the belief that 3
Rests was excessive, I would ask that, if the judgment is overruled,
remanded, or reassigned, you repay me in some manner.
I have no way of enforcing this, but I will note if you do not.
If the judgment is overruled or re-assigned then it was never valid,
which means the rests were never created, and therefore your spending
notes to destroy one was invalid.
Err, no. You can't retroactively prevent a judgement having happened.
Instead, the appeals panel has to destroy the rests by announcement;
which might be problematic, given that they no longer all exist. (Rule
1504; incidentally, {Wooble, Rodlen, Tiger} have failed for over a week
to meet this SHALL, but the rule forgets to specify a time limit. I
wonder what recourse I have in this case? Probably, a proposal to fix
the rule; I'll do that.)
--
ais523
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 2545 assigned to coppro
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote: Yally wrote: At the time I submitted that report, I was fully aware of this rule but I also legitamately thought that I was not breaching it. From my point of view, I don't have very many options. There is a plaintext option in Gmail, but selecting this removes any capabilities to change fonts or fontspacing, meaning I am stuck with a variable width font. Even now I'm unsure how to satisfy both the plaintext and monospaced requirements and, without some help, I'll probably break this rule again. Compose the report in a different window and copy+paste it into Gmail? I do this anyway, because I incrementally update the draft document as relevant events occur. Ehh... I guess I could do that. I generally just keep the report saved as a draft on gmail and then update that as events occur.
