Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] [CFJ] Revised distribution of proposals 7721-24
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 18:34:58 -0500 omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote: I've got the essential parameters -- author, AI, text -- right, so the initiation of the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt proposal 7723 succeeded -- after all, I'm permitted to initiate such decisions. However, I did fail to correctly reference Henri's proposal, so distributing, removing it from the pool and assigning an ID to it failed. So, I did initate a decision about a certain proposal with the text of Henri's proposal, but I definitly didn't distribute Henri's proposal. This was a thing many years ago, but at present creating a proposal requires an explicit announcement to that effect, so you distributed either Henri's proposal or none at all. I do not agree your distribution fails to clearly identify the proposal in question - after all, nobody seems to be in doubt about which one it is. That's not exactly what I've said. IMO, I didn't create any new proposals -- but I did initiate a decision about whether to adopt a mysterious, unspecified proposal 7723. And of course I've referenced Henri's proposal with a sufficient degree of acurateness for everyone to understand which proposal I'm referring to. But that's beside the point; the question is whether I've referenced it in a /formally/ correct way; and if not, whether this prevents my attempt at distribution. -- Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC E53D 08F5 7F90 3029 B5BD signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] [CFJ] Revised distribution of proposals 7721-24
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote: That's not exactly what I've said. IMO, I didn't create any new proposals -- but I did initiate a decision about whether to adopt a mysterious, unspecified proposal 7723. You are only permitted to distribute (defined as initiating the decision to adopt) proposals in the Proposal Pool; even if this were not the case, failure to identify a proposal would leave R107 (a) unsatisfied.
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] [CFJ] Revised distribution of proposals 7721-24
On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 18:54:11 -0500 omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de wrote: That's not exactly what I've said. IMO, I didn't create any new proposals -- but I did initiate a decision about whether to adopt a mysterious, unspecified proposal 7723. You are only permitted to distribute (defined as initiating the decision to adopt) proposals in the Proposal Pool; even if this were not the case, failure to identify a proposal would leave R107 (a) unsatisfied. Okay, this explanation makes sense. However, it would render scshunt's claim of my fourth distribution attempt failing wrong (it was no formal CoE, so it doesn't matter anyway), just like I originally thought. scshunt, what's your opinion on the matter? -- Luis Ressel ara...@aixah.de GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC E53D 08F5 7F90 3029 B5BD signature.asc Description: PGP signature
