Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Conductor] Lead Sheet
2009/5/28 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com: 2009/5/28 Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com: (1) Confusion Arises from Sufficiently Entropy-Infused Nickname Permutation Overwhelming Initial Nickname Transparency (previously Pavitra) (2) You May Call Me Big Fucking Edward (previously ehird) (3) Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck e^(-kt) (previously Goethe) (4) Abraham de Lacey Giuseppe Casey Thomas O'Malley Bayes is no longer a player, Pavitra did that name change to a-d and Gravity changed eir name to G.. I nominate someone or other for Conductor. On the inofficial namechange: maybe I should have understood that e wasn't serious from the fact that it was to a-d, but as nicknames aren't official I didn't bother to check. -- -Tiger
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Conductor] Lead Sheet
On Thu, 28 May 2009, Elliott Hird wrote: 2009/5/28 Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com: (1) Confusion Arises from Sufficiently Entropy-Infused Nickname Permutation Overwhelming Initial Nickname Transparency (previously Pavitra) (2) You May Call Me Big Fucking Edward (previously ehird) (3) Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck e^(-kt) (previously Goethe) (4) Abraham de Lacey Giuseppe Casey Thomas O'Malley Bayes is no longer a player, Pavitra did that name change to a-d and Gravity changed eir name to G.. I consider G., G, Gravity, Goethe or the note in (3) above to be unambiguous references to myself, and I don't think there would be much argument there, so these are probably accurate when used in any report. The nickname I publicly chose was Gravity Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck e^(-kt) and in ag-dis I suggested G. to recordkeepors for uniformity in abbreviation. Although the obvious mnemonic has also been mentioned. Maybe in a month when the records settle on something more or less you can CFJ on whether I've in effect chosen G. I should probably give some props to recordkeepors who have listed the long name, they deserve it :) -G.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Conductor] Lead Sheet
Rodlen wrote: Does giving your judgment in time on an appeals panel get you a note? -- --Rodlen I don't believe so, though R2126 says published at least one on-time judgment, whatever that means.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Conductor] Lead Sheet
Rodlen wrote: Does giving your judgment in time on an appeals panel get you a note? No, the panel gives judgement, and there's no Note reward for giving an opinion. (This prevents leaning players from making spurious appeals in hopes of being rewarded for trivial AFFIRMs.)
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Conductor] Lead Sheet
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Charles Schaefer chuckles11...@gmail.com wrote: 2008/12/29, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com: Weekly gains (Mon 29 Dec) - weekly duties: Sgeo (Notary) I'm the Notary, and what about the Holiday? Can you still award notes during the holiday? I don't see why not, they're not a future action whose time is dependent on a previous action as far as I can tell. Then again, a retarded monkey might disagree.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Conductor] Lead Sheet
ais523 wrote: On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 00:23 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: C#D# F#G#A# Player C D E F G A B Total DbEb GbAbBb -- ais523 1 1 3 1 4 11 1 13 I pledge that I will as soon as possible attempt to spend B D# F# to increase the VVLOD of the first player who spends a major triad to increase my VVLOD in the next week. I pledge that I will as soon as possible attempt to spend A C# E to increase the VVLOD of the second player who spends a major triad to increase my VVLOD in the next week. NttPF.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Conductor] Lead Sheet
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BobTHJ wrote: On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Conductor's Lead Sheet http://zenith.homelinux.net/conductor/ I just noticed that your combination page displays a minor chord as valid in the Major chord section, and a major chord as valid in the Minor Chord section for me. No, it's saying that you could spend a major chord in the key of D, F, or A (but not necessarily all three). Ah All this new-fangled technology is confusin'. BobTHJ
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Conductor] Lead Sheet
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BobTHJ wrote: On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Conductor's Lead Sheet http://zenith.homelinux.net/conductor/ I just noticed that your combination page displays a minor chord as valid in the Major chord section, and a major chord as valid in the Minor Chord section for me. No, it's saying that you could spend a major chord in the key of D, F, or A (but not necessarily all three). Ah All this new-fangled technology is confusin'. I wrote a script back when notes were adopted for finding an optimal combination of simultaneously spendable chords. I haven't gotten around to modifying it to account for transpositions, however. I'm willing to share it, if anyone is interested. -root
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Conductor] Lead Sheet
root wrote: I wrote a script back when notes were adopted for finding an optimal combination of simultaneously spendable chords. I haven't gotten around to modifying it to account for transpositions, however. I'm willing to share it, if anyone is interested. I've been pondering scrapping Notes in favor of something simpler, for several reasons: * Transposition * Prediction of near-future earnings * Keys (Conductor recordkeeping is more complex; advantage of earning notes from diverse sources is reduced, though not completely eliminated) * Note Exchange contract (does it completely defeat the intended 2-for-1 transfer rate, assuming optimal usage?) * Desire to revive the Oligarchy in some form * Large number of contract-defined currencies
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Conductor] Lead Sheet
Zefram wrote: It's not just you. The form of it that you quoted, which matches the physical layout in Murphy's original message, has all the sharp/flat headings one column to the right of the proper place. However, Murphy's message had ; format=flowed in its Content-Type, and my mail reader renders it with the sharp/flat headings shifted a column to the left, into their proper place. I've just flipped a couple settings that should turn it off. Here's a sample, copy+pasted from my draft document as usual: C#D# F#G#A# Player C D E F G A B Total DbEb GbAbBb -- avpx 1 1 BobTHJ 1 1 comex 1 1 Goddess Eris2 4 4 2 3 4 2 3 24 Goethe 3 1 2 4 1 1 5 4 2 3 26
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Conductor] Lead Sheet
Geoffrey Spear wrote: Is it just my mail client (viewing in monospaced font), or do the flats and sharps not line up correctly with their column headings? It's not just you. The form of it that you quoted, which matches the physical layout in Murphy's original message, has all the sharp/flat headings one column to the right of the proper place. However, Murphy's message had ; format=flowed in its Content-Type, and my mail reader renders it with the sharp/flat headings shifted a column to the left, into their proper place. format=flowed is an abomination and must die. Plain text used to have consistent rendering, until that came along. -zefram
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Conductor] Lead Sheet
On Feb 8, 2008 8:49 AM, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Geoffrey Spear wrote: Is it just my mail client (viewing in monospaced font), or do the flats and sharps not line up correctly with their column headings? It's not just you. The form of it that you quoted, which matches the physical layout in Murphy's original message, has all the sharp/flat headings one column to the right of the proper place. However, Murphy's message had ; format=flowed in its Content-Type, and my mail reader renders it with the sharp/flat headings shifted a column to the left, into their proper place. format=flowed is an abomination and must die. Plain text used to have consistent rendering, until that came along. -zefram I just copy and paste all of these into a text editor (either notepad or wordpad) with a monospaced font. Makes things easier. -- -Iammars www.jmcteague.com
