[framework-issues] [Issue 101217] Digital signature for OOo programm-files
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101217 --- Additional comments from coleban...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 14:07:25 + 2009 --- Kaspersky Anti-Virus solutions (and most likely others too) read the digital signature vendor name, and compares it with a built-in list of trusted applications. If the app is in the list, it is handled with predefined security- rules. In this case, the user doesn't need to answer so many questions from the AV. So, signing the executables can help providing a better user experience.. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 101217] Digital signature for OOo programm-files
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101217 Issue #|101217 Summary|Digital signature for OOo programm-files Component|framework Version|OOo 3.1 RC1 Platform|DEC URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|ENHANCEMENT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|tm Reported by|colebantam --- Additional comments from coleban...@openoffice.org Mon Apr 20 09:37:40 + 2009 --- The Java Executables are all (or mostly?) digitally signed. Why doesn't that belong to the OOo Files too? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 94736] Automatic linebreak hides space characters
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94736 Issue #|94736 Summary|Automatic linebreak hides space characters Component|Word processor Version|OOo 3.0 RC3 Platform|DEC URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|editing Assigned to|mru Reported by|colebantam --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 7 12:16:50 + 2008 --- In the OOo 3 Release candidates (tested in RC3 and RC4) space characters are hidden, if a automatic linebreak happens. How to reproduce: 1. Open a new Writer Document 2. Type a (without ) until the first is almost at the end 3. Type a Space Character 4. Type b until the first line is full (no linebreak must happen until now!) 5. Type a Space again 6. Type some c characters 7. Place the cursor ath the beginning of line 2 (in front of the C's) 8. type some more Space characters Expected behavior: The space characters should move the c characters to the right, revealing the amount of space characters. Actual behavior: The c character group is NOT moved to the right. No effect is visible at all.. Why this is anoying: At first this seems like beeing not so bad, but if the first line is edited, and gets shorter or longer, the hidden spaces are revealed, and very large groups of spaces could appear. This is definitely a bad behavior in my opinion... Target Milestone: I think its to late that for, but I would like to see that fixed before OOo 3 release ;-) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 49974] DB Access to AddressBook, NULL value handling erroneous/strange!
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49974 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 20 11:29:59 + 2008 --- Works for me with OOoDev300m25 and Thunderbird Addressbook. Both, IS Null and IS NOT NULL, queries the right data. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 90511] Linefeed added by copy p aste
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90511 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 20 11:34:12 + 2008 --- Works for me in OOoDev300m25 :-) Thanks! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 90511] Linefeed added by copy p aste
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90511 Issue #|90511 Summary|Linefeed added by copy paste Component|Word processor Version|OOo 2.4.1 RC2 Platform|PC URL| OS/Version|Windows Vista Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|editing Assigned to|mru Reported by|colebantam --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 9 08:17:18 + 2008 --- When I copy a string in OOo Writer 2.4.1 RC2 and paste it into a text editor (notepad.exe) there is allways a linefeed added at the end. Very anoying, because I use copy paste a lot, and I have to remove the linefeed manualy every time... This behavior did not exist in 2.4.0 release... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 90511] Linefeed added by copy p aste
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90511 User colebantam changed the following: What|Old value |New value Target milestone|--- |OOo 2.4.1 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 90511] Linefeed added by copy p aste
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90511 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 9 08:28:28 + 2008 --- Ohhh I forgot. The same happens in OOo-Dev_DEV300_m17. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 90511] Linefeed added by copy p aste
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90511 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 9 21:00:43 + 2008 --- Sorry, but does Target Milestone OOo 3.0 mean, that this regression will not be fixed in 2.4.1 Release? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 49974] DB Access to AddressBook, NULL value handling erroneous/strange!
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49974 User colebantam changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'atjensen,mechtilde' |'atjensen,colebantam,mecht | |ilde' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sw-issues] [Issue 70151] database explorer need to select address_query again by mailmerge printi ng
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70151 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 19 09:00:57 + 2008 --- Is this (realy anoying) problem indeed so hard to fix, that it must be postponed to 3.x? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 87236] Thunderbird Adressbook - ' IS EMPTY' query delivers wrong data
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87236 Issue #|87236 Summary|Thunderbird Adressbook - 'IS EMPTY' query delivers wro |ng data Component|Database access Version|OOo 2.4 RC5 Platform|DEC URL| OS/Version|Windows Vista Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|none Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|colebantam --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 19 09:18:45 + 2008 --- Making a query on the Thunderbird Adressbook as database fails, when 'IS EMPTY' is defined as criteria for the e-mail field (for example). steps to reproduce 1. if not exist, make some contacts with, and without e-mail adresses in TB 2. setup TB as database source 3. make a query on the adressbook from step1 4. set 'IS EMPTY' (IST LEER in German) as criteria to the 'E-Mail' field. 5. run the query expected result All contacts without e-mail address schould be displayed. actual result All contacts WITH e-mail addresses are displayed So the query does exactly the oposite of what it should be. I can not even use 'IS NOT EMPTY' (IST NICHT LEER in German), because this leads to error SQL- Status: HY000, Statement too complex (see separate issue I will report afer this ;-) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 87237] Thunderbird Adressbook - d b-criteria 'IS NOT EMPTY' leads to error SQL- Status: HY000, Statement too complex
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87237 Issue #|87237 Summary|Thunderbird Adressbook - db-criteria 'IS NOT EMPTY' le |ads to error SQL-Status: HY000, Statement too complex | Component|Database access Version|OOo 2.4 RC5 Platform|DEC URL| OS/Version|Windows Vista Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|none Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|colebantam --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 19 09:24:31 + 2008 --- Making a query on the Thunderbird Adressbook as database leads to error SQL- Status: HY000, Statement too complex, when 'IS NOT EMPTY' is defined as criteria for the e-mail field (for example). steps to reproduce 1. if not exist, make some contacts with, and without e-mail adresses in TB 2. setup TB as database source 3. make a query on the adressbook from step1 4. set 'IS NOT EMPTY' (IST NICHT LEER in German) as criteria to the 'E-Mail' field. 5. run the query expected result All contacts with e-mail address schould be displayed. actual result query cannot be run. The folowing error is displayed: SQL-Status: HY000, Statement too complex I just posted a related issue - Issue 87236 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 87236] Thunderbird Adressbook - ' IS EMPTY' query delivers wrong data
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87236 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 19 09:26:15 + 2008 --- The mentioned related issue - Issue 87237 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 86991] Mailmerge doesn't work as usual in 2.4 RC2 and RC4
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86991 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 15 09:40:43 + 2008 --- -os: Thanks for your help. I already knew the merge into fields solution. But using the Mailmerge Wizard saved me 2 clicks ;-) Whatever, if its not longer possible to keep the old behavior, I'm fine with this way... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 86991] Mailmerge doesn't work in 2.4 RC2 and RC4
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86991 Issue #|86991 Summary|Mailmerge doesn't work in 2.4 RC2 and RC4 Component|Database access Version|OOo 2.4 RC4 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|Windows Vista Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|none Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|colebantam --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 13 10:26:44 + 2008 --- Printing Documents with embedded Datafields doesn't update these fields with the current data in the document. Reproduce: 1. Open Document with Datafields 2. Select File - Print 3. Press OK on Button which asks, if user wants to do a mailmerge (Serienbrief) 4. Select a single row in from the selected Database 5. Click Print Expected Bahavior: The datafields in the document (not only the printout) should be updated with their coresponding vaules Actual Bahavior: The datafields in the document aren't updated in any kind (but the printout is ok) PS: I hope this new behavior is not wanted, because it doesn't fit into my workflow :-( I need the document updated with the databae values, not only the printout... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 86991] Mailmerge doesn't work as usual in 2.4 RC2 and RC4
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86991 User colebantam changed the following: What|Old value |New value Summary|Mailmerge doesn't work in |Mailmerge doesn't work as |2.4 RC2 and RC4 |usual in 2.4 RC2 and RC4 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[l10n-issues] [Issue 59086] [DE] Pers?nliches Adre?b uch instead of Persönliches Adreßbuch
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59086 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 1 03:03:13 -0700 2006 --- I have tested this with OOo 2.0.3 RC4, and it is fixed :-) Thanks to the Developers... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 50681] Address-Book Datasource W izard must allow user to specify addressbook l ocation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50681 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 24 01:45:46 -0800 2006 --- colebantam atjensen: Just look one post ago: So there is a workaround - rename the profiles, than OO can separate them. But in long terms there should be implemented a better solution. In your case, if the Seamonkey Profile doesn't contain important data - delete it and create a new one (Profile Manager), but with a name that differs from default... Then you can separate the profiles in OOo 2.0.x Btw, if this issue is important to you, vote for it! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 62370] New - Cannot connect to Ou tlook Addresses if Distribution List exists
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62370 Issue #:|62370 Summary:|Cannot connect to Outlook Addresses if Distribution |List exists Component:|Database access Version:|OOo 2.0.1 Platform:|PC URL:| OS/Version:|Windows, all Status:|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard:| Keywords:| Resolution:| Issue type:|DEFECT Priority:|P3 Subcomponent:|none Assigned to:|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by:|colebantam --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 21 00:30:54 -0800 2006 --- If there is one ore more distribution lists in outlook, OOo 2.0.x can NOT access this database. My Setup: Windows XP with Outlook 2003. Contacts folder with included Distribution Lists (Don't know if that is the correct definition in English Outlook, it is a translation from the German Verteilerliste). I cannot connect to the database with OOo 2.0.x. If I delete the Distribution List everything is fine, and I can access the data. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 59084] Cannot connect to Outlook Addresses in special case
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59084 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 21 00:34:44 -0800 2006 --- colebantam-clu: Sorry for mixing up two issues. I will remember that for the future ;) I posted a new issue for 2.) - Issue 62370 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 26 03:32:21 -0800 2006 --- DicBack.cmd: To correct an possible misunderstanding. DicBack.cmd was not intended as a solution to the problem, but as a quick'n dirty workaround. I wrote it for my friends and customers to simplify the update from 2.0 to 2.0.1, and decided afterwards that it might be useful for others to, and that for attached it to this thread. Shared Layer: This proposal of is is what I mentioned in the previous thread. I wrote that there should be a OO Folder in All Users\Application Data which contains the shared data. Of course is wrote it more detailed and from a more inside technical view ;-) I hope this new layer can be introduced without many other changes. Nevertheless, if OOo gets a new layer, a converter would be fine... Target: I fear that targeting this issue to Version 3 is far to late! I think a 2.1 Version Target would be much better. Also, I think that a solution for the 2.0. x Series should be introduced. Of course it makes no sense to implement a merge system for every file that could be changed by users (as is said), but an simple switch (Don't update my Dictionarys) in the installer would solve the problem at first. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 59086] OOo2.0.x shows Persö?li ches Adre?buch instead of Persönliches Adre ßbuch
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59086 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 03:40:23 -0800 2005 --- Uuuups. Just saw that I misspelled the wrong Adressbook. It should be named Pers?nliches Adre?buch not Persö?liches Adre?buch. Please, can anyone edit the summary and previous comment? Or shall I make a new report? With the wrong spelling, it is hard for people with the some problem to find it via query... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 18 06:43:30 -0800 2005 --- I wrote a small batchfile which reads the installation folder from the registry, and prompts the user afterwards if he wants to backup or restore the dic files. It is written for german speacking users, but maybe someone wants to translate it into english ;-) It may be usefull, as long as the update don't keep the installed dic's, which I fear will be the case for 2.0.1 at least... Try to create a attachment... I tested it only on XP, but should work on W2K to. Donst know for 9x... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 User colebantam changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment data| |Created an attachment | |(id=32518) Batch File for | |saveing dic files --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 18 06:45:02 -0800 2005 --- Created an attachment (id=32518) Batch File for saveing dic files - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 58847] Previous (2.0.0) Version not found
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58847 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 02:13:36 -0800 2005 --- @is: Thank you! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 10:53:27 -0800 2005 --- Danke Andre, warst schon wieder schneller ;-) Soll ich das mit dem All USers/Anwendungsdaten Ordner hier nochmal schreiben, oder reicht der Verweis auf dem alten Thread? MfG, Claus *VOTE* - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 58847] Previous (2.0.0) Version not found
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58847 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 9 09:27:02 -0800 2005 --- Overwriting or delete/write, its the same result ;-) OK, I think this issue is not an installer issue, but a generel one. Nevertheless, the problems with the dictinary.lst could be solved by the installer. A simple option in the installer don't delete/replace my Dictionaries, which tells the installer to don't touch the dict folder, would solve the problem. (To be honest, I think nearby ALL users don't wants their dic's to be deleted, so this option might not even be necesery, but could be hard wired [*.ini].) The correct behavier in long term would be to store the dictionarys/templates not in the programm directory, but in the All Users/Application Data Folder. Files in that folder should survive the OO 2.0 Installer routines? So what Component should this issue be reported to? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 59084] New - Cannot connect to Ou tlook Addresses
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59084 Issue #:|59084 Summary:|Cannot connect to Outlook Addresses Component:|Database access Version:|OOo 2.0.1 Platform:|PC URL:| OS/Version:|Windows, all Status:|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard:| Keywords:| Resolution:| Issue type:|DEFECT Priority:|P3 Subcomponent:|none Assigned to:|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by:|colebantam --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 04:08:42 -0800 2005 --- If one of the folowing conditions are true, I cannot acces the outlook addressbook: 1.) Outlook is not set as standard E-Mail client This is very anoying, since I want Thunderbird to be my Default Mail Client. So if I set Outlook to be, a mailto link on website opens a compose mail window in outlook instead of Thnderbird. 2.) Distribution Lists exists in Outlook Contacts If there is one ore more distribution lists in outlook, OOo 2.0.x can also NOT access this database. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 58847] Previous (2.0.0) Version not found
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58847 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 04:19:17 -0800 2005 --- Glad to see that Andre has posted that already. I have the some problem, with OO 2.0.1 RC2 Installer not detecting the already installed 2.0. I think for a modern software, that not anly wants to get new users, but also to keep the existing, this is a must have feature... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 58847] Previous (2.0.0) Version not found
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58847 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 04:29:12 -0800 2005 --- I think this issue should be targeted to 2.0.1. Or does anyone realy wants to explain his/her friends/customers why the 2.0.1 update could mess up there installation, and that they must install there wordbooks (for example) again? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 59086] New - OOo2.0.x shows Pers ö?liches Adre?buch instead of Persönliches Adreßbuch
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59086 Issue #:|59086 Summary:|OOo2.0.x shows Persö?liches Adre?buch instead of |Persönliches Adreßbuch Component:|Database access Version:|OOo 2.0.1 Platform:|PC URL:| OS/Version:|Windows, all Status:|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard:| Keywords:| Resolution:| Issue type:|DEFECT Priority:|P3 Subcomponent:|none Assigned to:|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by:|colebantam --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 04:42:35 -0800 2005 --- If I connect to my Thunderbird Addressbook, my Personal Addressbook apears with wrong charakter encoding (Persö?liches Adre?buch instead of Persönliches Adreßbuch). Don't know if thins is a databes or localication error, I postet it to the database crew. Sorry if I am wrong... Info: Thunderbird AND OOo2.0(.1) are german versions... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dba-issues] [Issue 50681] Address-Book Datasource W izard must allow user to specify addressbook l ocation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50681 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 07:17:57 -0800 2005 --- I had the same problem just now. I configered the Thunderbird adressbook several times, but no etries showed up. Queit some time later, I realized, that there is still a Mozilla Suite installation. And since the automatic created account in mozilla is allways named default, OOo 2.0 opend this Adressbook, instead of the Thunderbird one... So there is a workaround - rename the profiles, than OO can separate them. But in long terms there should be implemented a better solution. I think it would be ok, when the addresswizard of OO2 REALY looks (only) in the thunderbird Profile folder, and not in the mozilla suite profile folder. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[installation-issues] [Issue 58847] Previous (2.0.0) Version not found
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58847 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 08:45:49 -0800 2005 --- Due to is comment, I retested the whole case. It is correkt that 2.0.1 imports most settings from 2.0, but not all. In every scenario the dictionay.lst is overwritten with a default one. This fores the user to reinstall all used dictionarys. An anvanced user off course can backup the file before, but the average user will not be amused to have to reconfigure ... If 2.0 was installed to a userdefined path, and the update is made to the default path (And vice versa?), then will also the templates be lost. Again, the adcanced user can backup, but normal users... In my opinion these 2 problems should be solved before releasing 2.0.1. If 2.0.1 contains an important security fix that should be out as soon as possible, the sitiation is different off course... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
