[framework-issues] [Issue 95496] loadComponentFromUrl() fre ezes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95496 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|CLOSED|REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE | --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 29 11:57:47 + 2010 --- As I explained in my comment, issue 65999 was erroneously closed. As the analysis here is more detailed and has a ready to run testcase, I am reopening this issue here rather than 65999. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 93818] Writer crashes printing th is document with note
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93818 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'cmc,hdu,hi,kpalagin,mod,p|'cmc,hdu,hi,kpalagin,mod,m |sfales,tl'|ux2005,psfales,tl' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 110665] Build fails with --disabl e-vba
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110665 Issue #|110665 Summary|Build fails with --disable-vba Component|tools Version|DEV300m75 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|mh Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 7 08:34:41 + 2010 --- Building fails when you configure with --disable-vba. The problem seems to be that the makefile.mk files in the vbahelper/ subdirectory don't test for ENABLE_VBA. The error message complains that oovbaapi.rdb is not found (which is quite understandable since the oovbaapi module isn't built when --disable-vba is set). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 110665] Build fails with --disabl e-vba
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110665 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 7 08:38:56 + 2010 --- When you add the ENABLE_VBA guards to the vbahelper module there is another build failure in filter/source/msfilter while building libmsfilterli.so. /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lvbahelperli Apparently the filter depends on vbahelper. I don't see how to fix this dependency. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 110185] Crash when printing on no n-default printer (probably related to post-it notes)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110185 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Apr 1 14:09:38 + 2010 --- @mod: Which one do you want me to test? 320_m14 or 300_m74? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[porting-issues] [Issue 108953] Conflict between libldap5 0.so and libldap2
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108953 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 19 08:12:23 + 2010 --- It seems that at the moment there is no good workaround for this issue. --disable-mozilla seems to break OOo in strange ways. See issue #110246. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@porting.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@porting.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 110246] --disable-mozilla removes macro security dialog
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110246 Issue #|110246 Summary|--disable-mozilla removes macro security dialog Component|tools Version|OOO320m13 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|configure Assigned to|rene Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Mar 19 08:10:17 + 2010 --- I wanted to build with --disable-mozilla to avoid issue #108953, but when testing the resulting build I found that the Macro Security... button no longer works. It's not greyed out but clicking it doesn't do anything anymore. If I add the --enable-mozilla switch again and leave everything else unchanged, the button works. Please, can someone give me a workaround for this problem. We have a lot of crashes due to 108953 and don't need the ldap functionality. How can I build without it without breaking something else. The switch --disable-ldap doesn't seem to help. The library libldap50.so is still built. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 110185] Crash when printing on no n-default printer (probably related to post-it notes)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110185 Issue #|110185 Summary|Crash when printing on non-default printer (probably r |elated to post-it notes) Component|Word processor Version|OOO320m13 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|Linux Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|printing Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 17 11:13:36 + 2010 --- When attempting to print the document ba.odt from issue #96281 on a non-default printer (i.e. in the print dialog I choose a different printer in the drop-down box) OOo crashes. The crash is reproducible every time but requires that the sticky notes sidebar is visible. If it is turned off in Options, the crash does not occur. So it appears to be yet another bug introduced with the oh-so-pretty sticky notes. I see the crash under Linux with OOo 3.0.1 and above. I will attach a backtrace and valgrind run from 3.2.1 m13. I could not reproduce the crash under Windows. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 110185] Crash when printing on no n-default printer (probably related to post-it notes)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110185 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 17 11:14:08 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=68388) Backtrace of crash - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 110185] Crash when printing on no n-default printer (probably related to post-it notes)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110185 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 17 11:14:47 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=68389) Valgrind log of crash run - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 109534] Query on query doesn't wo rk for Calc databases
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109534 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 26 13:29:11 + 2010 --- I'm reopening this as a DEFECT, because the Wizard allows you to create these queries. IOW, even a non-technical user who never enters the realm of SQL can, by simply clicking through the wizard, end up with an error message he does not understand and a broken query in his datasource. If this feature is not supported for Calc datasources, then the query wizard should not present other queries in the dialog to select the source table. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 109534] Query on query doesn't wo rk for Calc databases
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109534 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 26 13:33:51 + 2010 --- Even better from a usability standpoint would be for the wizard to present the query in the selection but to refuse this setting with a message saying This selection is unsupported for the current data source. That way users won't be confused why they sometimes (for MySQL etc. databases) have queries in this dialog and sometimes don't. In any case, this is a defect of the wizard. A wizard must not allow the selection of non-working choices and the creation of broken queries. That defeats the whole point of having a wizard, which is to make things accessibly by non-technical users. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 109534] Query on query doesn't wo rk for Calc databases
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109534 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Summary|Query on query doesn't wor|Query on query doesn't wor |k for HSQL databases |k for Calc databases --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Feb 24 15:40:57 + 2010 --- I'm sorry. I confused my data sources. The problem exists in Calc data sources. I have changed the summary accordingly. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 109534] Query on query doesn't wo rk for HSQL databases
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109534 Issue #|109534 Summary|Query on query doesn't work for HSQL databases Component|framework Version|OOo 3.2 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|tm Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Feb 23 10:46:46 + 2010 --- 1. Create an HSQL database 2. Create a table t 3. Create a query select * from t and save it as q1 4. Try to create a 2nd query select * from q1. This produces the error The query cannot be executed. It contains no valid table. The problem is also reproducible if you Use Wizard to create Query to create the 2nd query. With a MySQL db this works. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 96281] Printing in wrong size dep ending on the aspect ratio of open writer docu ment
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96281 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 18 12:20:40 + 2010 --- We want to update from OOo 3.0.1 (where we can't reproduce this problem although the reporter says he found it in 300m9) to OOo 3.1 or 3.2 but we're bitten by this problem. Strangely enough it does not seem to affect all documents with notes. Can someone tell me what the specific circumstances are that trigger this behaviour and if there is some way to fix affected documents (removing the notes is not an option). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 96281] Printing in wrong size dep ending on the aspect ratio of open writer docu ment
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96281 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'mux2005' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 108773] Incorrect Hyperlink
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108773 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Feb 3 13:16:03 + 2010 --- @rainerbielefeld: The point is that the Excel import filter breaks the link. The link is correct and working in MS Excel. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 108773] Misinterpretation of rela tive path information from EXCEL should be avo ided by open-input filter
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108773 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Feb 3 16:46:15 + 2010 --- Sorry. The previous example was the old one again. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 108773] Misinterpretation of rela tive path information from EXCEL should be avo ided by open-input filter
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108773 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Feb 3 16:47:56 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=67584) This time for real: Example with 2 hyperlinks. One is imported correctly, the other isn't - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 108458] All Comments are hidden b ut Comment area remains
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108458 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 28 09:31:32 + 2010 --- @christophnoack: As I've said, all I want is the old pre-sidebar behaviour back with respect to invisibility. If there are any ambiguities, just do what OOo 2.x did in the same situation. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105474] View jumps up to the top of the comment/note if it's longer than the sc reen height
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105474 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'mux2005' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 108709] Writer corrupts comments larger than 16448 characters
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108709 Issue #|108709 Summary|Writer corrupts comments larger than 16448 characters Component|Word processor Version|OOo 3.2 RC4 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 27 12:15:51 + 2010 --- 1. Open a new empty writer document 2. Open the attached file in a simple text editor (such as KEdit or Kate). DO NOT USE OOo! 3. Mark all text in the file and Copy it to the clipboard 4. Insert/Comment. Place cursor in the comment box in the side bar 5. Paste the text into the comment 6. Scroll to the end of the comment text. You'll see the end of the text is deploying a ne Microsoft communications system If you look at the original text you'll see that OOo has replaced the w from new with a line break. This bug has been introduced with the new side bar comment system. NOTE: This is NOT a copy'n'paste bug. If you do the above procedure with OOo 2.4 and save the document and then open it with OOo 3.x, OOo corrupts the comment, too. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 108709] Writer corrupts comments larger than 16448 characters
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108709 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 27 12:16:36 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=67439) Example text to demonstrate bug - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 108710] UI bugs with large commen ts
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108710 Issue #|108710 Summary|UI bugs with large comments Component|Word processor Version|OOo 3.2 RC4 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 27 12:42:51 + 2010 --- 1. Open a new empty writer document. 2. Set the zoom factor so that only half of the writer document fits on the screen vertically, i.e. you get a vertical scroll bar. 3. Insert/Comment 4. Paste lots of text into the comment. E.g. use the example text from issue 108709: http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/67439/ms3.txt 5. The first UI bug is that the comment is not rendered completely until you click into it. 6. Try to edit the end of the comment's text. The first usability issue is that I need to scroll both the comments own scrollbar and the document's scrollbar to get to the end of the comment text. The bigger problem is that when you type something OOo scrolls the document's scrollbar (NOT the comment's own scrollbar!) back up so that the cursor (and the text I type) is no longer visible and I have to type blind. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 108709] Writer corrupts comments larger than 16448 characters
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108709 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 27 12:54:33 + 2010 --- The problem only occurs when the long text doesn't contain its own line breaks. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 108458] All Comments are hidden b ut Comment area remains
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108458 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|CLOSED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 26 16:03:53 + 2010 --- I don't buy the people will complain that they missed a comment argument. When the document creator has hidden a comment, then the comment is obviously not meant for consumption by receivers of the document who are not told specifically about it. Why else would he have hidden the comment? You are thinking about techies. Those can use the navigator to find all comments. About not being worth an option. That's a good point, but we already have an option for it that is perfectly applicable. It's the option to show hidden text. Obviously this should make the side pane with the comments re-appear because it makes the text the comments are attached to appear. This further eliminates your argument that people could be bothered by missing a comment. There is no indication that there is any hidden text in a document unless you decide to turn on the option to show it. So far, no one has complained. I don't see how comments should be different from the main text. And if I may remind you, before the side pane was introduced, comments were exactly like text. The little boxes disappeared completely when the text was invisible, unless showing hidden text was enabled. All I want is to have the old behaviour back. If it was okay back then, it's okay now. We have to scenarios where hidden comments come into play. The first one is when parts of a document are hidden/unhidden on demand (through an interactive extension) and comments related to hidden text are not supposed to be read (because they don't apply). The second are comments that contain data only for consumption by our extension. In both cases I don't want the user experience to suffer by a sub-optimal zoom factor and an empty side panel that will confuse ordinary users (who wonder if this is a graphic bug and they should be seeing something there), but this is what OOo currently does. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 108458] All annotations are hidde n but annotation area remains
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108458 Issue #|108458 Summary|All annotations are hidden but annotation area remains Component|Word processor Version|OOO320m9 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|viewing Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 19 14:12:04 + 2010 --- Open the attached document. It contains one annotation but it is hidden. However OOo still shows the annotation area to the right of the document and adjusts the zoom factor accordingly. Ideally the annotation area should not be present at all if no annotations are visible. If that is not possible, at least adjust the zoom factor as if it were not there, so that it is scrolled out of view when opening the document. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 108458] All annotations are hidde n but annotation area remains
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108458 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 19 14:13:05 + 2010 --- Created an attachment (id=67295) All annotations are hidden, but the annotation are remains an ugly stripe to the right of the document. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 105752] SDK binaries lack executa ble permission bit
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105752 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 7 12:56:22 + 2010 --- @is: How did you build your deb packages? Can someone tell me which Makefile/script/settings file is (or should be) responsible for setting these permissions. Then I could check in my build why it's not being called. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 107743] Race condition launching application
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107743
Issue #|107743
Summary|Race condition launching application
Component|framework
Version|OOo 3.2 Beta 1
Platform|All
URL|
OS/Version|All
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Status whiteboard|
Keywords|
Resolution|
Issue type|DEFECT
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|tm
Reported by|mux2005
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Dec 17 10:32:28
+ 2009 ---
The following does not work reliably
{ swriter macro:d } ; swriter foo.odt
Sometimes nothing happens (i.e. foo.odt is not opened). If I introduce a sleep
between the 2 calls like this
{ swriter macro:d } ; sleep 2 ; swriter foo.odt
it works all the time. There seems to be a race condition in OOo's start code
that causes the first command to prevent the execution of the second when the
second is started while the 1st has not yet finished running.
I can reproduce this under Linux and Windows XP (with Cygwin).
Note that while this testcase may seem contrived we found this in a real world
environment. It happens when one or several 3rd party applications launch OOo
processes in rapid succession.
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 95369] Writer crash related to in put fields
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95369 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Dec 18 07:07:11 + 2009 --- @es: Yes, I can reproduce the crash with m8 exactly as described. The URL of the .tar.gz has changed, though. This page has the current links: http://forge.osor.eu/frs/?group_id=11 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 95369] Writer crash related to in put fields
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95369 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Keywords|needmoreinfo, oooqa |oooqa --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Dec 18 07:27:30 + 2009 --- The crash can also be reproduced without installing the uno.pkg extension. To do this, change the instructions as follows 1. Instead of WollMux.uno.pkg download version 5.9.3 of WollMuxBar.jar from http://forge.osor.eu/frs/?group_id=11 4b. After the normal step 4, edit the wollmux.conf to add the following line at the end ALLOW_EXTERNAL_WOLLMUX true 5.-7. Instead, after closing all OOo instances launch java -jar WollMuxBar.jar This will start OOo via the bootstrap mechanism. The dialog described in step 8. will pop up. The remaining steps are the same. As you can see even when just communicating with OOo via the socket connection, it will crash. In this scenario there's none of our code executing in OOo's JVM. As you will also notice, in this scenario OUR GUI remains even after OOo crashes, because it's not our Java code that crashes. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 107688] Complete loss of content opening ODT file
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107688 Issue #|107688 Summary|Complete loss of content opening ODT file Component|Word processor Version|OOO320m5 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P2 Subcomponent|open-import Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 15 11:48:37 + 2009 --- The attached document opens fine with OOo versions 3.2. OOo 3.2 complains that the document is corrupted. If you say Yes to the question on whether OOo should repair the document, the complete text is gone. Whatever property caused OOo 3.2 to become confused seems to be injected by our document management system (a commercial system used in the e-government sector). It seems that ALL documents I check out from the DMS are affected. Tested under Linux and Windows. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 107688] Complete loss of content opening ODT file
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107688 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 15 11:49:23 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=66646) Opens fine in versions 3.2. Complete data loss in 3.2 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 107688] Complete loss of content opening ODT file
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107688 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Keywords| |regression - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 88623] New Document from Template Closes when opening second document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88623 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 26 14:01:14 + 2009 --- I see this under Linux, too. OS should be All. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 106875] driver-dependent JDBC cla sspath configuration is ignored when using the DriverManager instead of a DataSource
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106875 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'mux2005' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 105690] Build fails with --disabl e-vba
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105690 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:34:25 + 2009 --- Verified in 320_m2 and DEV300_m62 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 105690] Build fails with --disabl e-vba
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105690 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:34:50 + 2009 --- Closing - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 106226] Crash/freeze/leak on crea teEnumeration()
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106226 Issue #|106226 Summary|Crash/freeze/leak on createEnumeration() Component|Word processor Version|OOo 3.2 Beta 1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|programming Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 23 15:09:33 + 2009 --- If you click the button in the attached document, OOo will consume all CPU and memory. Depending on your system you may need to do a hard reset. The problem happens when the macro attempts to enumerate over the 1st paragraph to which the folding mark line in the left margin is anchored. The problem only happens when enumerating via the bookmark. If the enumeration is done via the ThisComponent.Text object, the paragraph can safely be enumerated. The macro code is as follows: ThisComponent.Bookmarks.getByIndex(0).getAnchor().createEnumeration().nextElement().createEnumeration() The issue has been confirmed under Windows and Linux. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 106226] Crash/freeze/leak on crea teEnumeration()
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106226 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 23 15:10:41 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=65561) Press button and kiss your system goodbye - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 99999] OOo 3.2 release stoppers / blockers
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 23 15:59:36 + 2009 --- I nominate issue 106151 as a blocker. It's a regression that may break a lot of macro code and extensions. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105921] InputUser field hast 2 fi eldmasters
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105921 Issue #|105921 Summary|InputUser field hast 2 fieldmasters Component|Word processor Version|OOO320m1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|programming Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 09:27:45 + 2009 --- The attached document has an InputUser textfield (inserted manually via the GUI). The textfield's XDependentTextField.getTextFieldMaster() method returns a field master whose only connection to the text field seems to be that it lists it in its DependentTextfields property. Other than that it does not seem to be a real field master at all. It does not control the field's content nor does it show up in the document's XTextFieldSupplier.getTextFieldMasters() collection. The real fieldmaster can be obtained via getByName(com.sun.star.text.fieldmaster.User.FOO). Interestingly this field master controls the actual content of the field but does not list it in its DependentTextFields property. To look at this yourself, open the attached test document, open the Basic IDE, single-step to End Sub and then use the Watch window to examine the fakeFieldMaster and realFieldMaster variables. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105921] InputUser field hast 2 fi eldmasters
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105921 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 09:28:48 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=65382) test macro - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[graphics-issues] [Issue 105382] Freeze when open an exist ing presentation with multiple master pages
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105382 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'andreschnabel,cloph,ganti|'andreschnabel,cloph,ganti |m,gghh,jbfaure,mechtilde,m|m,gghh,jbfaure,mechtilde,m |od' |od,mux2005' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@graphics.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@graphics.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105943] Events delivered for temp orary mail merge documents
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105943 Issue #|105943 Summary|Events delivered for temporary mail merge documents Component|Word processor Version|OOO320m1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|programming Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 16 05:53:04 + 2009 --- Currently, when a mail merge is performed, all the usual events such as OnCreate are broadcast via the GlobalEventBroadcaster. This is a problem because - it reduces performance, sometimes drastically depending on what kinds of and how many extensions are listening for events and how they react to them. Even a single extension that returns immediately from the event listener will slow down the mail merge measurably. - it hurts stability: I regularly encounter freezes during mail merge, when an extension is installed that processes these temp documents, even if it only reads info from them. I guess this is because OOo somehow suffers ill effects from the many accesses to disposed objects (because the extension cannot control the document lifetime and it is very short, it is almost certain that the extension will access the temp document after it has been disposed). Note that I'm NOT talking about the extension having problems due to the DisposedExceptions. The extension catches them and stops processing the document. But OOo does not seem to react kindly to the high number DisposedExceptions it has to throw. - it has no useful application (AFAICS): Extensions cannot do something meaningful with these temporary documents, because they are an implementation detail of the mail merge and exist only for a short time. There is no point in exposing this implementation detail at all. - extensions can't ignore these temp. documents. AFAICS there is no way to distinguish them from ordinary documents. They are invisible, sure, but that's too coarse a filter. Some external apps create invisible documents that may need to be processed by an extension. In earlier versions of OOo, these temporary documents had a URL that included .tmp which could be used to ignore these documents but this has changed in OOo 3.2 (which is why I'm reporting this now). Now they no longer have a URL at all. To avoid these problems I suggest that - events should not be reported for temporary mail merge documents. These documents are an implementation details whose properties may (and in the past have) change without notice. They should not be exposed to application code. - If reporting of these events is desired, they should be broadcast on a different event broadcaster to avoid the slowdown when someone is listening on the GlobalEventBroadcaster. - At the very least there should be a fast way of telling these temporary documents (or their events) apart from other documents/events, so that extensions can minimize the time spent accessing these temp documents. However I consider this only a band-aid, because the performance issues do not disappear completely and OOo stability may still suffer. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105859] Crash opening template
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105859 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 14 08:37:43 + 2009 --- @mru: I've built fwk122 and indeed the crash is not reproducible with that build. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105859] Crash opening template
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105859 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Keywords| |regression Priority|P3|P2 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 13 12:12:36 + 2009 --- Works fine in OOo 3.1.1 = regression, +crash = P2 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105859] Crash opening template
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105859 Issue #|105859 Summary|Crash opening template Component|Word processor Version|OOO320m1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|Linux Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|open-import Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 13 12:10:02 + 2009 --- OOo crashes whenever I attempt to open the attached template. This issue has already been present in at least m60. I don't know how far back it goes. I can only reproduce it on Linux (vanilla build, not Go-ooo.org). Under Windows everything seems to be okay. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105859] Crash opening template
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105859 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 13 12:11:06 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=65340) Crashes OOo when opening - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105859] Crash opening template
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105859 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 13 12:14:41 + 2009 --- To avoid misunderstanding: I'm not saying the document works with go-oo.org builds. I just haven't tested them. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105859] Crash opening template
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105859 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 13 15:59:38 + 2009 --- My builds do not produce crash reports for policy reasons. Issue 105520 says that it's fixed in fwk122. As I write this I'm switching my tree to fwk122. If it builds for me, I will test it an report results. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 105690] Build fails with --disabl e-vba
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105690 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 9 06:02:41 + 2009 --- Looking at the diff between m59 and m60, it is clear that the 2nd ENDIF that has been added in the change is misplaced. It is supposed to be at the end of the file to match up with the 2nd IF that has been added. IOW, the .IF $(ENABLE_VBA)!=YES is supposed to bracket the complete makefile. --- constants/makefile.mk (.../DEV300_m59/oovbaapi/ooo/vba) (Revision 276794) +++ constants/makefile.mk (.../DEV300_m60/oovbaapi/ooo/vba) (Revision 276794) @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ PACKAGE=org$/vba$/constants # --- Settings - + .INCLUDE : $(PRJ)$/util$/makefile.pmk .IF $(ENABLE_VBA)!=YES @@ -43,8 +44,8 @@ @echo not building vba... .ELSE +.IF $(L10N_framework)== # - # I tried to use the IDLFILES target but it failed dismally MY_GEN_IDL_PATH=$(MISC)$/idl MY_GEN_UCR_PATH=$(OUT)$/ucr$/$(PACKAGE) @@ -53,10 +54,12 @@ MYIDLFILES=$(foreach,i,$(MYTMPIDLFILES) $(MY_GEN_IDL_PATH)$/$(i)) MYURDFILES=$(foreach,i,$(MYIDLFILES) $(MY_GEN_UCR_PATH)$/$(i:b).urd) MYDBTARGET=$(OUT)$/ucr/constants.db +.ENDIF +.ENDIF - .INCLUDE : target.mk +.IF $(L10N_framework)== ALLTAR: $(MYDBTARGET) $(MY_GEN_UCR_PATH)$/%.urd: $(MY_GEN_IDL_PATH)$/%.idl @@ -66,4 +69,3 @@ $(REGMERGE) $(OUT)$/ucr/constants.db /UCR @$(mktmp $(MYURDFILES)) .ENDIF - - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 105752] SDK binaries lack executa ble permission bit
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105752 Issue #|105752 Summary|SDK binaries lack executable permission bit Component|tools Version|DEV300m59 Platform|Unknown URL| OS/Version|Linux Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|mh Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 9 07:59:11 + 2009 --- The binaries such as idlc in the Debian archive ooobasis3.2-sdk...deb lack the executable bit: -rw-r--r-- root/root318400 2009-10-08 23:13 ./opt/openoffice.org/basis3.2/sdk/bin/uno-skeletonmaker -rw-r--r-- root/root 11952 2009-10-08 23:13 ./opt/openoffice.org/basis3.2/sdk/bin/unoapploader -rw-r--r-- root/root203104 2009-10-08 23:13 ./opt/openoffice.org/basis3.2/sdk/bin/javamaker -rw-r--r-- root/root239684 2009-10-08 23:13 ./opt/openoffice.org/basis3.2/sdk/bin/idlc -rw-r--r-- root/root289276 2009-10-08 23:13 ./opt/openoffice.org/basis3.2/sdk/bin/cppumaker -rw-r--r-- root/root 1763864 2009-10-08 23:13 ./opt/openoffice.org/basis3.2/sdk/bin/autodoc -rw-r--r-- root/root 68640 2009-10-08 23:13 ./opt/openoffice.org/basis3.2/sdk/bin/regcompare -rw-r--r-- root/root 29836 2009-10-08 23:13 ./opt/openoffice.org/basis3.2/sdk/bin/idlcpp - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 105752] SDK binaries lack executa ble permission bit
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105752 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |65262) Patch for the issue | | --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 9 10:46:15 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=65262) Patch for the issue - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 105752] SDK binaries lack executa ble permission bit
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105752 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 9 10:47:43 + 2009 --- Sorry, I confused the issue number. The patch is for another issue. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 105690] Build fails with --disabl e-vba
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105690 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |65263) Patch for the issue | | --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 9 10:48:42 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=65263) Patch for the issue - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105322] Note lost on save/Crash
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105322 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 8 13:27:41 + 2009 --- Yes. The problem seems to be fixed in m60. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 105690] Build fails with --disabl e-vba
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105690 Issue #|105690 Summary|Build fails with --disable-vba Component|tools Version|DEV300m60 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|Linux Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|mh Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 7 16:33:01 + 2009 --- = Building module oovbaapi = /ooo/build-ooo/src-3.2_m61/trunk/oovbaapi/genconstidl mkout -- version: 1.8 not building vba... /ooo/build-ooo/src-3.2_m61/trunk/oovbaapi/ooo/vba/excel not building vba... /ooo/build-ooo/src-3.2_m61/trunk/oovbaapi/ooo/vba/msforms not building vba... /ooo/build-ooo/src-3.2_m61/trunk/oovbaapi/ooo/vba/constants dmake: makefile.mk: line 68: Error: -- Missing targets or attributes in rule ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /ooo/build-ooo/src-3.2_m61/trunk/oovbaapi/ooo/vba/constants dmake: Error code 1, while making 'build_instsetoo_native' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 105690] Build fails with --disabl e-vba
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105690 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 7 16:42:30 + 2009 --- The build issue is present in m60 and m61. It was not present in m59. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105322] Note lost on save/Crash
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105322 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 7 17:01:36 + 2009 --- I repeat my question: Why is a regression that causes data loss not a release blocker? Isn't this the worst kind of bug possible? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 99999] OOo 3.2 release stoppers / blockers
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 7 17:02:59 + 2009 --- I think issue 105322 should be a release blocker. It is a regression causing data loss simply by saving an existing document. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105322] Annotations lost on save
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105322 Issue #|105322 Summary|Annotations lost on save Component|Word processor Version|DEV300m58 Platform|Unknown URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P2 Subcomponent|save-export Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 24 10:12:31 + 2009 --- 1. Open writer 2. File/Templates/Edit... 3. Open the attached file test.ott 4. Take note that the file has an annotation 5. Change something in the text 6. Save 7. File/Reload 8. The annotation is gone. Apparently it has not been saved. Tested under Windows and Linux. Data loss + Regression = P2 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105322] Annotations lost on save
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105322 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 24 10:13:49 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=64927) Open for template editing. Touch. Save. Annotation is gone. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105322] Annotations lost on save
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105322 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value Keywords| |regression - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105322] Annotations lost on save
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105322 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 24 10:18:41 + 2009 --- Also happens when you simply use the template, i.e. Open it so that you get an Untitled document. Save that document. Annotation is lost. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 105322] Note lost on save/Crash
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105322 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 24 11:42:55 + 2009 --- As this is a regression causing data loss, I think it should be a release blocker for 3.2. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 102164] DEV300m48: java extension s won't work - classloader problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 22 10:58:02 + 2009 --- @sb: I would think that the classloader set by OOo so far wasn't arbitrary. Surely it was capable of loading the standard classes from the JRE. What else could JEditorPane() want a classloader for? @milek_pl: Have you tested with Java 6? I don't see the problem with Java 5, either. And I would very much like to set the context classloader at the beginning of my extension and be done with it, however the affected thread, the event-dispatching thread, is not under my complete control. Something resets its context classloader at unknown (to me) times. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 84159] Crash while closing the do cument: SfxItemPool cannot contain more than 2 ^16 non-poolable items
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84159 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'pitonyak,tjfrazier' |'mux2005,pitonyak,tjfrazie | |r' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 102164] DEV300m48: java extension s won't work - classloader problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 18 13:20:43 + 2009 --- @oj: If I understand you correctly, in the use case you describe a new thread is started for every call. Rather than attempting to shave off time from thread creation, wouldn't it be better to eliminate this extensive creation of threads in the first place? After all, even without the context classloader code, thread creation takes time. That the eliminated code is called for every database access does not mean that eliminating it will result in a significant speed increase. It all depends on how much time is wasted elsewhere. Aside from that point, this seems like it is very specific to the database backend. Would it not be possible to treat those threads specially and have their creation path avoid the context classloader setting code, whereas other threads would still use it? And as a bandaid for the current issue, would it not be possible to set the context classloader at least for the non-application-controlled threads such as the event dispatching thread. I really don't think OOo 3.2 can ship if commonly used extensions just break. I think people will much rather live with the database performance they've now had to live with for years. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 102164] DEV300m48: java extension s won't work - classloader problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 18 16:31:45 + 2009 --- I don't think the world will ever be cleaned up. New incorrect uses of the context classloader comparable to that in JEditorPane() will spring up as fast as they are fixed in other places. There are many 3rd party Java libraries. How could we ever verify them all? I am a very experienced Java developer and I freely admit that I have only a basic understanding of classloaders. And I do think I am very representative of Java developers in this regard. It is irrelevant if developers should care more about classloaders and should take more time to study all of their intricacies. They don't. And this won't change. Classloaders are and will forever remain one of the obscure aspects of Java that developers only care about when things break. It is telling that it is a part of Swing's core code that has brought this issue to life. If even Sun's developers can't get context classloader use right, what do you expect? So I believe that the only safe choice (and IMHO only a safe choice is acceptable in an important application such as OOo) is to keep the current AttachGuard as the general case and only add the optimization where it is known to be safe. And since the normal AttachGuard can simply call the code of the FastAttachGuard and then add the classloader setup code, there is no redundant code that would cause a maintenance issue. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 102164] DEV300m48: java extension s won't work - classloader problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 17 09:19:51 + 2009 --- Please reconsider the removal of the classloader setting code. The performance gains seem very dubious. It's unlikely that anything in the OOo context would spawn 1000s of threads which would be required to make the time savings visible on a macroscopic scale. Was this change triggered by actual results from *profiling* a real world use case? How large were the measured performance gains? If there were no actual measurements to justify the change this seems like a prime example of premature optimization (which as we all know is the root of all evil). Even if there are performance gains in some special situations, this has to be weighed against the negative consequences. As we can see from this issue you are buying your performance gains with complete breakage of existing components. Buying a little speed in a few use cases with complete breakage of widely deployed packages would be considered very unwise by most people. The worst thing is that this creates a permanent Sword of Damocles over the heads of Java component developers. There is no reason to expect that JEditorPane is the only code making the assumption that the context classloader is non-null. And there is no reason to expect that even if this bug is fixed in Swing it will not reoccur at some other place as code gets rewritten and added to the JRE. The Java execution environment OOo sets up with its null context classloader is obviously unusual, something not even the Java guys at Sun test for, not to speak of the many 3rd party libraries written by developers with even less knowledge of the hairy details of Java. And it cannot be emphasized enough that there is no general workaround for this problem (at least none has been mentioned here so far). There is no way I can simply set the context classloader of the EDT myself in my component. I've tried but it only works temporarily but gets reset at some point, which means I would need to sprinkle my code with classloader-setting code. And I have no way of knowing in which places it's needed. Swing and the JRE are moving targets. And if 3rd party libraries trigger this problem, there is no workaround at all, because I can't change the 3rd party library. So please back out that change until you can offer a reliable and generally applicable way for a Java component to ensure a non-null context classloader that includes 3rd party libraries. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[dba-issues] [Issue 103772] DEV300_m53: seamonkey bui ld and undefined reference to `pango_x_font_ma p_for_display'
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103772 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'cmc,ericb,fs,maho' |'cmc,ericb,fs,maho,mux2005 | |' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 102164] DEV300m48: java extension s won't work - classloader problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 07:33:38 + 2009 --- If in a thread you call code that has requirements on the context class loader, you must ensure that those requirements are met Sure, but AFAIK there is no documented requirement that instantiating a JEditorPane would require a certain context classloader. What is the stack trace of the caught NullPointerException? java.lang.NullPointerException java.util.Hashtable.put(Unknown Source) javax.swing.JEditorPane.registerEditorKitForContentType(Unknown Source) javax.swing.JEditorPane.registerEditorKitForContentType(Unknown Source) javax.swing.JEditorPane.loadDefaultKitsIfNecessary(Unknown Source) javax.swing.JEditorPane.getKitTypeRegistry(Unknown Source) javax.swing.JEditorPane.createEditorKitForContentType(Unknown Source) javax.swing.JEditorPane.getEditorKitForContentType(Unknown Source) javax.swing.JEditorPane.setContentType(Unknown Source) javax.swing.JEditorPane.init(Unknown Source) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 102164] DEV300m48: java extension s won't work - classloader problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 13:05:31 + 2009 --- What's the status of this issue? This is affecting our WollMux extension, too and I have a bad feeling about the posted workaround. If it was about a Thread I've spawned myself it would be a different matter, but fiddling with the classloader of the event dispatching thread doesn't sound like a good idea. I'm sure application code is not supposed to do that. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 102164] DEV300m48: java extension s won't work - classloader problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 13:12:34 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=64773) Open attachment, allow macros, press button. If you see Alles in Ordnung everything is fine. If you see Exception: java.lang.NullPointerException things are broken. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 102164] DEV300m48: java extension s won't work - classloader problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 13:52:10 + 2009 --- The problem seems to occur only if a Java extension is installed. If I run the attached BeanShell macro on a plain OOo installation, the context classloader of the EDT is non-null. However if a Java extension is installed, the EDT's context classloader is null. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 99999] track 3.2 release
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'cornouws,khirano,mechtild|'cornouws,khirano,mechtild |e,ohallot,rene,rt'|e,mux2005,ohallot,rene,rt' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[tools-issues] [Issue 104695] OOo 3.2 beta release stop pers / blockers
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104695 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'cornouws,mh,rene'|'cornouws,mh,mux2005,rene' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 104556] Crash/Freeze due to race between OnNew and loadComponentFromUrl()
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104556 Issue #|104556 Summary|Crash/Freeze due to race between OnNew and loadCompone |ntFromUrl() Component|framework Version|OOo 3.1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|scripting Assigned to|ab Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 27 15:53:41 + 2009 --- It appears that when an OnNew event handler (or as in the case of the test document an autostart macro) closes a document loaded via loadComponentFromUrl before it has returned, OOo crashes or freezes. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 104556] Crash/Freeze due to race between OnNew and loadComponentFromUrl()
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104556 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 27 15:55:36 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=64414) Open the attached document (macros must be allowed), press the big button. OOo should crash. You may have to try several times. As this issue is timing-dependent, it is unreliable to reproduce. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 104074] Proxy setting System sh ould not prevent setting of No proxy for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104074 Issue #|104074 Summary|Proxy setting System should not prevent setting of |No proxy for Component|framework Version|OOO310m11 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|ENHANCEMENT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|ui Assigned to|tm Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 7 06:07:52 + 2009 --- The Tools/Options/Internet/Proxy UI does not allow setting No proxy for when the proxy is set to System. This is overly restrictive. There are several scenarios when it makes sense to exclude certain servers from being proxied even if you otherwise want to use your system's proxy setting. In my case the proxy is not supposed to be used for connections to local Intranet servers (because obviously a direct connection is faster and causes less network traffic). I have created an extension which sets the following config prop oor:name=ooInetProxyType oor:finalized=true value1/value /prop prop oor:name=ooInetNoProxy oor:type=xs:string oor:finalized=true value*.mylocaldomain.de/value /prop i.e. the combination of System and a no proxy for list and it seems to work. The proxy is used for Internet connections but not for mylocaldomain.de. So it seems that it is only the UI that prevents the setting of this combination. The actual network code seems to deal with it just fine. I request that the UI be changed to allow setting a No proxy for list even when System proxy is selected. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 104076] Setting ooInetProxyType d oesn't work in shared layer
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104076 Issue #|104076 Summary|Setting ooInetProxyType doesn't work in shared layer Component|framework Version|OOO310m11 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|tm Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 7 07:27:09 + 2009 --- Steps to reproduce: 1. unopkg add --shared proxyoffdoesntwork.uno.pkg 2. Remove test user's .openoffice.org directory 3. Launch soffice 4. Check Tools/Options/Internet/Proxy Expected behaviour: The extension sets prop oor:name=ooInetProxyType value0/value /prop so the Proxy should be None. Actual behaviour: Proxy is System. Further notes: If the extension is installed in the user layer (i.e. without --shared), the setting takes effect, however that is not an appropriate workaround, because the goal is to provide a system-wide default configuration via the extension. Likewise, adding oor:finalized=true makes it work in the shared layer, but that is undesirable, too, because the goal is to provide a working default configuration not to force the setting on the user. OOo should respect the proxy setting in the shared layer even when it is not finalized. This is necessary to allow a system-wide default configuration via an extension. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 104076] Setting ooInetProxyType d oesn't work in shared layer
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104076 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 7 07:28:16 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=64004) Extension for testing the issue. Use according to instructions in issue description. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 95624] getString() sometimes incl udes paragraph numbering
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95624 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'mla' |'mla,mux2005' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 102348] XTextRangeCompare throws IllegalArgumentException when compairing two X TextRange of two XTextTable
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102348 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'cornouws'|'cornouws,mux2005' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 102164] DEV300m48: java extension s won't work - classloader problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'milek_pl,ms,sb' |'milek_pl,ms,mux2005,s | |b' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 102293] Line breaks differ betwee n Linux and Windows
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102293 Issue #|102293 Summary|Line breaks differ between Linux and Windows Component|Spreadsheet Version|OOo 3.1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|formatting Assigned to|spreadsheet Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed May 27 10:20:16 + 2009 --- As the attached test document and screenshots demonstrate, line breaks within cells differ between Windows (2000 in this case) and Linux, even when Use printer metrics for text formatting is NOT ACTIVE. The whole point of printer independent text formatting IMHO is to achieve a look that is consistent among different workstations. If this does not work among different OSes, then the feature is pointless in heterogeneous environments. Furthermore it's confusing in this case because admins will think that unchecking Use printer metrics for text formatting is a good thing even though the results would be more consistent with the checkbox set (assuming that the environment is homogeneous with respect to the printers deployed, which is often the case). When Use printer metrics for text formatting is DISABLED, then the formatting should be printer AND operating system independent. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 102293] Line breaks differ betwee n Linux and Windows
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102293 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed May 27 10:21:28 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=62571) Test document: The cell's line break differs on Windows and Linux - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 102293] Line breaks differ betwee n Linux and Windows
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102293 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed May 27 10:22:01 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=62572) Screen shot from Windows - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 102293] Line breaks differ betwee n Linux and Windows
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102293 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed May 27 10:22:24 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=62573) Screeen shot from Linux - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 5658] Spreadsheet thinks a number is a string (text)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5658 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri May 22 10:05:03 + 2009 --- How about implementing the following things: 1. If the user enters a formula that contains arithmetic on text cells, then add explicit conversion functions to it. I.e. the user enters A1+10 and A1 contains text, then when the user submits the formula, write convertonumber(A1,...) + 10 into the cell, where converttonumber is a conversion function (I don't what the actual function in Calc is called, assuming it exists) that accepts a parameter that specifies the number format. The number format parameter would be filled with the format appropriate for the current locale. That way, we fix the user's mistake and create a portable formula that will work consistently even when the spreadsheet is ported to a different locale (because the conversion is completely explicit). It may be useful to introduce an informational popup message such as The formula you have just entered tries to perform arithmetic computations on string cells. Appropriate string - number conversion functions have been automatically added to the formula. I would advise against making this a Do you want this? choice dialog, because there is no sensible reason for the user to reject this transformation. 2. When opening/importing, fix all formulas with string arithmetic according to 1. Since we do not usually know the creating environment (creating program, locale,...) and as such cannot with 100% accuracy predict the proper number format to use for conversions, a dialog such as the following would be nice: The document you are trying to open contains formulas that try to do arithmetic computations with strings. OpenOffice.org can attempt to guess the proper text - number conversion parameters. However, this may lead to incorrect results in affected cells. If you choose 'No' below, then all affected cells will be flagged with an error and you will have to fix them manually. Do you want OOo to attempt to fix cells automaticall? Yes/No. If the user chooses Yes, introduce conversion functions as in 1, making a best effort based on whatever information we have about the document to guess the conversion parameters. If the user chooses No, treat the affected formulas as if they had syntax errors. This approach will - prevent the user from creating documents with implicit string arithmetic (ambiguous or undefined behaviour) - allow the user to open/import documents based on implicit string conversions and have (most of the time) a working spreadsheet (that no longer contains implicit conversions) - allow the user to open/import documents based on implicit string conversions and go the safe route of flagging all problematic cells as error for manual inspection and fixing. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 79784] Can't select a other Addre ss List with the Mail Merge Wizard
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79784 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Apr 24 07:49:59 + 2009 --- When I follow baumux instructions _exactly_ (with 3.1 m10) I end up with a dialog that has Test3 selected but OK button disabled. However, when I reclick Test3, OK button is correctly enabled again. So in m10 there seems to be at best a minor visual glitch right after the dialog is shown. The original problem seems to be gone. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 79784] Can't select a other Addre ss List with the Mail Merge Wizard
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79784 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Apr 23 12:25:25 + 2009 --- @hi: Where is the sense in closing an OLDER issue as duplicate of a NEWER issue? Isn't it usually done the other way around? And the newer issue is against a newer version of OOo. So this move obscures the age of the issue. Furthermore the newer issue has much less verbose steps to reproduce and less information overall. In other words: WTF? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 79784] Can't select a other Addre ss List with the Mail Merge Wizard
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79784 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Apr 23 12:26:41 + 2009 --- Forgot to mention that all of the CCers of this issue here now will have to add themselves to the new issue. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sw-issues] [Issue 100268] MailMerge: Databse table will mixed up by several databases
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100268 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'mux2005' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[api-issues] [Issue 101249] XTextRange.getString() in side of numbered list returns item number
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101249 Issue #|101249 Summary|XTextRange.getString() inside of numbered list returns | item number Component|api Version|OOo 3.0.1 Platform|All URL| OS/Version|All Status|UNCONFIRMED Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|jsc Reported by|mux2005 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 21 15:36:31 + 2009 --- The button in the test document executes the simple macro Sub Main range = ThisComponent.Bookmarks.getByName(test).Anchor range.String = range.String Test End Sub which is supposed to append the word „Test“ to the text range marked by the bookmark „test“. However, the result is incorrect. In addition to the appended text, a „1.“ is inserted before the word „This“. The reason is that XTextRange.getString() erroneously returns the „1.“ which is outside the bookmark and does not even have a representation in the document model. XTextRange.getString() must not return the item number. It is not part of the text range. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@api.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@api.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[api-issues] [Issue 101249] XTextRange.getString() in side of numbered list returns item number
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101249 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 21 15:37:36 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=61710) Press button to demonstrate bug - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@api.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@api.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 100878] OOo crashes when clicking Extension Manager button Check for updates
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100878 --- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 8 06:45:13 + 2009 --- This issue may be a duplicate of #100744 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[framework-issues] [Issue 100744] errors in description.xml kill extension manager dialog
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100744 User mux2005 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'dv,henrikjust,juergenfenn|'dv,henrikjust,juergenfenn |,kso,mh,sba,ul' |,kso,mh,mux2005,sba,ul' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
