Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: Some proposed ALSA sysfs changes to stock kernel from GregKH
At Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:19:46 +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: > > Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote: > > > >> R Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > Greg KH is proposing some sysfs changes to the stock kernel - any > >> > impact on CVS ALSA? Is it ok to rely solely on CVS ALSA - I always > >> > build 2.6 from the stock tree and then immediately overwrite the > >> > sound directory with ALSA CVS. > >> > >> Those patches do not apply cleanly to the latest ALSA version. There > >> are some minor conflicts, all easily resolved. I'm not sure whether > >> anything else depends on the ALSA changes, but I wouldn't think so. > >> I've been running ALSA 1.0.1 merged with Greg's patches for some > >> time, and it seems to be working well. > > > > We will merge these patches when they're merged to mainstream. > > I suppose someone will also update the drivers as needed. Only the > intel8x0 driver has been updated. The rest should still work as > before these patches. yep, they have been already done on my local tree, together with USB and isapnp changes. now just waiting for the integration of Greg's stuff to the main tree (or maybe mm tree would be enough). Takashi --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
[Alsa-devel] Re: Some proposed ALSA sysfs changes to stock kernel from GregKH
Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote: > >> R Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Greg KH is proposing some sysfs changes to the stock kernel - any >> > impact on CVS ALSA? Is it ok to rely solely on CVS ALSA - I always >> > build 2.6 from the stock tree and then immediately overwrite the >> > sound directory with ALSA CVS. >> >> Those patches do not apply cleanly to the latest ALSA version. There >> are some minor conflicts, all easily resolved. I'm not sure whether >> anything else depends on the ALSA changes, but I wouldn't think so. >> I've been running ALSA 1.0.1 merged with Greg's patches for some >> time, and it seems to be working well. > > We will merge these patches when they're merged to mainstream. I suppose someone will also update the drivers as needed. Only the intel8x0 driver has been updated. The rest should still work as before these patches. -- Måns Rullgård [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: Some proposed ALSA sysfs changes to stock kernel from GregKH
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote: > R Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Greg KH is proposing some sysfs changes to the stock kernel - any > > impact on CVS ALSA? Is it ok to rely solely on CVS ALSA - I always > > build 2.6 from the stock tree and then immediately overwrite the > > sound directory with ALSA CVS. > > Those patches do not apply cleanly to the latest ALSA version. There > are some minor conflicts, all easily resolved. I'm not sure whether > anything else depends on the ALSA changes, but I wouldn't think so. > I've been running ALSA 1.0.1 merged with Greg's patches for some > time, and it seems to be working well. We will merge these patches when they're merged to mainstream. Jaroslav - Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer ALSA Project, SuSE Labs --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
[Alsa-devel] Re: Some proposed ALSA sysfs changes to stock kernel from GregKH
R Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Greg KH is proposing some sysfs changes to the stock kernel - any > impact on CVS ALSA? Is it ok to rely solely on CVS ALSA - I always > build 2.6 from the stock tree and then immediately overwrite the > sound directory with ALSA CVS. Those patches do not apply cleanly to the latest ALSA version. There are some minor conflicts, all easily resolved. I'm not sure whether anything else depends on the ALSA changes, but I wouldn't think so. I've been running ALSA 1.0.1 merged with Greg's patches for some time, and it seems to be working well. -- Måns Rullgård [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn ___ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel