Re: [Alsa-user] aloop questions and a possible suggestion
Xover wrote: > Clemens Ladisch googlemail.com> writes: >> It is intended to be used when there is no actual hardware device. > > By way of some background, what is the snd-loop rate shift facility intended > to be used for? To synchronize with some other clock. (Which is what you were doing; but a plugin doesn't require synchronization to begin with.) Regards, Clemens -- ___ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
Re: [Alsa-user] aloop questions and a possible suggestion
Clemens Ladisch googlemail.com> writes: > > It is intended to be used when there is no actual hardware device. > > Many thanks Clemens. I will try to learn what plugins do, and how to use them. By way of some background, what is the snd-loop rate shift facility intended to be used for? Clearly a great deal of effort has been put into developing it, and I have found it useful as a problem solver (I had to slightly modify the driver to lock the capture and playback deltas together to make it work for me, though). In which scenarios would you imagine it being used 'properly'? -- ___ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
[Alsa-user] Different ALSA hw Parameters for Asus XONAR U7
I have an Asus XONAR U7 which only seems to allow 192k samples on the hw:U7,0 device sometimes. Using aplay --dump-hw-params, I saw different parameters with no clear idea of why they had changed. Most of the time 192k sampling works just fine, and --dump-hw-params gives the following. ACCESS: MMAP_INTERLEAVED RW_INTERLEAVED FORMAT: S16_LE S24_3LE SUBFORMAT: STD SAMPLE_BITS: [16 24] FRAME_BITS: [32 192] CHANNELS: [2 8] RATE: [44100 192000] PERIOD_TIME: [125 2972155) PERIOD_SIZE: [6 131072] PERIOD_BYTES: [64 524288] PERIODS: [2 1024] BUFFER_TIME: (62 5944309) BUFFER_SIZE: [12 262144] BUFFER_BYTES: [64 1048576] TICK_TIME: ALL But sometimes 192k does not work, but 48k works just fine, and the --dump-hw-params looks different. ACCESS: MMAP_INTERLEAVED RW_INTERLEAVED FORMAT: S16_LE SUBFORMAT: STD SAMPLE_BITS: 16 FRAME_BITS: 32 CHANNELS: 2 RATE: [44100 48000] PERIOD_TIME: [1000 2972155) PERIOD_SIZE: [45 131072] PERIOD_BYTES: [180 524288] PERIODS: [2 1024] BUFFER_TIME: [1875 5944309) BUFFER_SIZE: [90 262144] BUFFER_BYTES: [360 1048576] TICK_TIME: ALL Is there something that is changing the configuration of the sound card without my knowledge? Or is there a reason why 44100, 48000, and 192000 should not always be an allowable rate? -- ___ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user