Hi Jensen,
Thanks for laying out the options!
Nir,
Do you have any thoughts on Jensen's suggestion?
thanx!
-- Kevin J. Ma
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 8:47 PM Jensen Zhang
wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Thanks for the information about the new CDNI footprint types.
>
> RFC 9241 is going to be published soon. To leverage Sec 6 of RFC 9241 [1],
> the new footprint type should be added to the ALTO Entity Domain Types
> registry.
>
> [1]
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9241.html#name-query-footprint-properties-
>
> In the recent ALTO WG weekly meeting, we had some brief discussion on how
> to proceed. There are two options:
>
> 1. Add a new section/subsection in
> draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types to register the new footprint
> type "subdivisioncode" to the ALTO Entity Domain Types registry.
> 2. Submit a new document to ALTO WG later to update the ALTO Entity Domain
> Types registry.
>
> Personally, I will suggest the second option. It will keep the current
> document clean and not interrupt the IETF process.
>
> I cc'ed ALTO mailing list to see if we have any other feedback from other
> ALTO experts.
>
> Best,
> Jensen
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 10:59 PM Kevin Ma
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jensen/Jan,
>>
>> With the ALTO CDNI draft to be published shortly, one question came up
>> wrt the adding of new footprint types to CDNI: should the ALTO Entity
>> Domain Types registry also be updated? In the case of
>> draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types, should subdivisioncode be added
>> to the ALTO Entity Domain Types registry?
>>
>> thanx!
>>
>> -- Kevin J. MA
>>
>> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 12:52 AM Kevin Ma
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> As we discussed in the session at IETF 113, the footprint extension
>>> draft (draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types) is pretty
>>> straightforward and registers two useful new footprint types. There were
>>> no objections to moving to WGLC in the session, though Benson Muite did
>>> mention a potential concern about ISO3166 codes. This is the official
>>> working group last call. If you have any comments, questions, or concerns
>>> please respond to this thread.
>>>
>>> The latest version of the draft can be found here:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types/
>>>
>>> This WGLC will stay open for two weeks and close on May 26, 2022. If no
>>> objections or major issues are raised in that time, we will move to submit
>>> the draft to the IESG.
>>>
>>> thanx!
>>>
>>> -- Kevin and Sanjay
>>>
>>
___
alto mailing list
alto@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
