[android-developers] Android's UrlConnection doesn't support HTTP 1.1 persistent connections...why?
As of HTTP 1.1, socket connections should be persisted for re-use across calls. This greatly reduces the overhead of network connections especially for mobile devices Android's UrlConnection doesn't appear to honor this HTTP 1.1 specification. E.g. I performed a TCP dump of traffic from my app to see what was happening. Connection:keep-alive is being sent properly to my server. My server is then responding with Connection:keep- alive. However after my app closes the UrlConnection's InputStream, the underlying socket is being closed as well...instead of being persisted. Anyone know a workaround? NOTE: HttpClient seems to respect the http.keepAlive. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android's UrlConnection doesn't support HTTP 1.1 persistent connections...why?
Sorry I mis-typed the problem class. UrlConnection does properly supports HTTP 1.1 and persistent connections. However DefaultHttpClient does not. I have validated this by viewing the packets using WireShark on my Android device. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Accessing Facebook photos from the Contacts provider
After scouring the web and confirming it myself, Facebook's photos are stored in a manner that prevents access by other apps. This inability to access Facebook sync'd photos is a side effect of how Facebook syncs contacts. Facebook creates an account on the device using Android's AccountManager (http://developer.android.com/reference/android/ accounts/AccountManager.html) which creates a secure space in which an app can store sync'd contact information. Using AccountManager to create accounts for storing contact information is the Android recommended way to sync contact information. Short of it then? Facebook's uses the standard Account/Contact syncing functions built into Androidand these functions prevent us from getting those photos. Makes sense from a security and permissions perspective. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Accessing Facebook photos from the Contacts provider
That's right, appel. I'm trying to access the FB contacts through the ContactsContract. Seems like the Facebook photos are stored with special permissions. I can get an FB photo's row _id from the Photos db but cannot retrieve the photo for some reason. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Accessing Facebook photos from the Contacts provider
From what I've read so far, it's not possible to access any of the photos that Facebook syncs to the Contacts provider. Does anyone know a way around this other than (1) asking the user to login with their Facebook credentials, (2) downloading the photos again using the FB social graph, and (3) save these images to your own space in the Android Contacts provider? Even if I did this, how can I ensure my photos the one display by Android in the Contacts app? Thanks in advance -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: How does Beautiful Widget do it?
That was it Mort. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] How does Beautiful Widget do it?
Does anyone know how Beautiful Widget shows clouds floating over the top of all the desktop icons as well as over the top of any running application on device unlock? It seems odd that they would be able to grab the render buffer of a running application and display info above it. Any info would help! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: How does Beautiful Widget do it?
Thanks for the hint, Pent. Sadly not enough to go on there. The app permissions are: Storage Your Location Network Communicaitons System Tools Mabye something in System Tools? Please offer any more advice of you have it? Anyone? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Allowing one .apk to install another?
We are providing an Android Service to multiple customers for packaging into their .apks and need to ensure that only a single instance of our Service is running at a time. The ideal situation would be this: When one of our customers's apps is installed on a device, it looks for instances of our Service. If our service is not present, our customer's app would install our Service. If our Service was present, the customer's app would use the existing Service. If the currently installed Service was an older version, our customer's app would upgrade the current Service with the newer one. We are pursuing a Shared Library solution, but this introduces many extra issues: access to resources, declaration of our Services in the customer manifest, Instead, we prefer to provide our customers with an .apk that would be optionally installed. Has anyone tried to do anything similar? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] WebView.setEmbeddedTitleBar (public API or not?)
BrowserActivity uses WebView.setEmbeddedTitleBar to create the cool search bar feature at the top of it's web pages. This embedded title bar doesn't zoom when the users zoom the web page or scroll left/ right. My question is whether WebView.setEmbeddedTitleBar is a public API? The source shows that WebView.setEmbeddedTitleBar is a public method but when I look at the API documents here it doesn't show up: http://developer.android.com/reference/android/webkit/WebView.html So are we allowed to use WebView.setEmbeddedTitleBar or could it disappear sometime in the near future? Thanks, Anthony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] How do we attach an image/files to a forum posting?
I've seen a few people attached images files to their posts. Could somebody explain how I can do this? I don't see any options for doing this when I post a message. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: How do we attach an image/files to a forum posting?
Figured it out. Send emails to the Google Group (e.g. android- develop...@googlegroups.com assuming your a member of the group) along with image/file attachments. Here's what I achieved: http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse_thread/thread/2eb18f338d007b2b# -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] How to have one ContentProvider call another ContentProvider (ContentProvider chaining?)
I have a ContentProvider class that I want to securely expose to 3rd party apps using Android's read/write permissions in the provider tag of the manifest. I prefer to have two content providers though: my main provider and an externally accessible provider would access the main provider for content. This isn't working though because I get this error when a 3rd party app calls my external provider: UnsupportedOperationException: Only CrossProcessCursor cursors are supported across process for now. The programming logic for this error is that ContentResolver's wrap cursors within a CursorWrapperInner class that doesn't extend CrossProcessCursor. Curiously the 3rd party app doesn't throw an exception if calling my main provider directly. The exception only occurs when one provider calls another. I hope somebody can make sense of this and offer a suggestion. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] ContentProvider: multiple read/write permissions
I need to ship my content provider with multiple read/write permissions. Can I simply enter the permissions as a comma separated list as below? provider android:name=.HelloProvider android:authorities=com.android.HelloPlugin android:writePermission=xxx, yyy, zzz android:readPermission=xxx, yyy, zzz/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] DDMS not showing all active processes for my Nexus One
This problem came up recently but everything seemed to work fine before. I am using the application flag: android:debuggable=true For some reason though, DDMS is not showing my application's active processes on my Nexus One. Anyone with recommendations? I've already rebooted both my laptop, Eclipse, and my phone. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Why add child Activities to TabActivity instead of simply using Views
I've been programming in Android for two years now and just joined an Android project where they are using a TabActivity to host multiple Activities. It's unclear why this is better than rewriting the TabActivity to simply use Views instead. TabActivity extends ActivityGroup which means TabActivity can host both Activities and Views. But what's the use of this capability? I was under the impression that Activities should be treated as individual screens of an application. In short, what is an example use case where it's recommended that TabActivity should host multiple Activities rather than multiple Views? Any insights much appreciated! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Digicert signed https certificate throwing SSLException (Not trusted server certificate)
FYI...in our case, the certificate was not installed properly on the server. You can test your certificate here: http://www.digicert.com/help. Make sure to scroll to the bottom as some error only show up a few pages down. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Multi-threaded http requests cause exception
Hi Frank, Thanks for pointing me back to AsyncTask. I had seen AsyncTask but hadn't updated my code to it. Instead I had relied on Threads and Handlers as they had worked without a problem before. I'm still unsure why the Thread and Handler setup wasn't working, but now that I've updated to AsyncTask everything is working great. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] AsyncTask and simultaneous network downloads
I am performing several https posts and http downloads from two
different servers using AsyncTasks. The connections are fairly quick
but I'm surprised to see that they are running synchronously instead
of in parallel.
To be more explicit, here is pseudo-code for what's happening when I
initiate a call to AsyncTask1():
AsyncTask1 {
for (i=1 to 3) {
result = getDataFromServer1();
moreDataUrl = parseResult(result);
secondNetConnect = new AsyncTask2();
secondNetConnect.doInBackground(moreDataUrl);
}
}
AsyncTask2 {
connects to 2nd server
}
What ends up running is this every time:
AsyncTask1a, AsyncTask1b, AsyncTask1c, AsyncTask2a, AsyncTask2b,
AsyncTask2c
I would have expected at least some interleaving of the AsyncTask1 and
AsyncTask2. Is there a known issue with non-simultaneous network
calls in Android using AsyncTask?
Thanks,
Anthony
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: AsyncTask and simultaneous network downloads
Thanks Streets. That appears to be the issue, however it's odd that I'm hitting AsyncTask's thread pool limit so quickly with just 3 tasks running. Looking at AsyncTask's code, I see these values: private static final int CORE_POOL_SIZE = 1; private static final int MAXIMUM_POOL_SIZE = 10; While the core pool size is 1, I should still get up to 10 threads. Instead I seem to only be getting 1. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: AsyncTask and simultaneous network downloads
Hi Jason. Thanks for requesting the clarification. My code is actually calling AsycnTask.execute(). I should have made that clearer in my pseudo-code. The description above shows all threaded portions of the app. I stripped down to a basic test implementation to isolate the multithreading for performance testing. I need to find an easy way to see if I'm somehow hitting the max pool size or whether the additional threads in the pool are not being generated/used for some reason. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: AsyncTask and simultaneous network downloads
Here's the code:
public class ProcessFiles extends AsyncTaskVoid, String,Void {
protected Void doInBackground(Void unused) {
File sdcard = new File(/sdcard);
for (int i = 0; i sdcard.list().length; i++) {
File file = new File(sdcard,sdcard.list()[i]);
try {
FileInputStream is = new FileInputStream(file);
String artUrl= artFinder.findArtwork(is, this,
context);
publishProgress(artUrl);
if (fingerprinter.getError() != null) {
break; // Error occurred so quit
}
} catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
return null;
}
public void onProgressUpdate(String artUrl) {
ArtRetrievalTask task = new ArtRetrievalTask();
task.execute(artUrl);
}
}
}
public class ArtRetrievalTask extends AsyncTaskString ,
Void,Drawable {
protected Drawable doInBackground(String artUrl) {
Drawable art = null;
if (artUrl != null artUrl!= null) {
try {
HttpClient client = new DefaultHttpClient();
HttpParams params = client.getParams();
HttpConnectionParams.setConnectionTimeout(params,
15000);
HttpGet httpGet = new HttpGet(artUrl);
HttpResponse httpResponse = client.execute(httpGet);
HttpEntity responseEntity = httpResponse.getEntity();
byte[] artData =
EntityUtils.toByteArray(responseEntity);
if ( artData != null artData .length 0) {
// We could store the cover art onto
the hard drive. For this
demo however, we simply load directly into
// a Drawable for display by the UI.
ByteArrayInputStream is = new
ByteArrayInputStream(artData );
art = Drawable.createFromStream(is,
src);
}
} catch (SocketTimeoutException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
return coverArt;
}
protected void onPostExecute(Drawable coverArt) {
imageView.setImageDrawable(coverArt);
}
}
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: AsyncTask and simultaneous network downloads
HttpClient doesn't serializing the requests from what I can tell. Before switching to AsyncTask, I was using Threads and the http requests were running in parallel. It's only since I switched to AsyncTask that everything started running in parallel. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: AsyncTask and simultaneous network downloads
Got an update here. The AsyncTask code above appears to run in parallel on a device. Maybe there's something non-parallel in the Emulator's version of AsyncTask? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Multi-threaded http requests cause exception
I have an app making an https post on one thread while performing a file download on another thread. For some odd reason, I am getting a ClientProtocolException saying that The server failed to respond with a valid HTTP response. The error goes away if everything is run on a separate thread. Oddly if I run the two server requests in serial, the error goes away. It seems there's a bug that happens when two requests are made at the same time. Important note: The post occurs to a different server than the download so the servers themselves should not be causing the problem. The code is simple. Here's the file download code: HttpGet httpGet = new HttpGet(url); HttpClient client = new DefaultHttpClient(); HttpParams params = client.getParams(); HttpConnectionParams.setConnectionTimeout(params, 15000); HttpResponse httpResponse = client.execute(httpGet); HttpEntity responseEntity = httpResponse.getEntity(); byte[] data = EntityUtils.toByteArray(responseEntity); The post code's the same except for these additional lines: HttpPut httpPut = new HttpPut(url); httpPut.addHeader(Content-Type, text/xml); httpPut.setEntity(new StringEntity(postData, UTF-8)); BasicHttpParams parameters = new BasicHttpParams(); HttpConnectionParams.setConnectionTimeout(parameters, 15000); HttpClient client = new DefaultHttpClient(); HttpResponse httpResponse = client.execute(httpPut); HttpEntity responseEntity = httpResponse.getEntity(); metaData = EntityUtils.toString(responseEntity); Thanks, Anthony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Multi-threaded http requests cause exception
I've tracked the problem down to a rather odd place: Handler. The first post networking call is kicked off on a separate thread when the user clicks a button. When this call returns its result, a Handler is spawned to update the UI and also download the image data for display in a newly created ImageView. If the file download Thread is started from within the Handler's Runnable, I get the error described above. HOWEVER if I spawn the thread outside the Handler's Runnable, then all works well. Sadly...I need to make the call from with the Handler is that's where my ImageView is created. SO I'm stuck at the moment. I don't see why spawning a Thread inside a Handler's Runnable callback should be a problem as I should then be on the main thread. Curiously I can use Drawable.createFromStream(new URL(url).getContent()) to create my Drawable without a problem. I guess Android's own code knows a workaround to my bug. However I actually need the image data for storage to a file first so that Drawable solution won't work for me. Time to dig into Android's code to see why Drawable.createFromStream (new URL(url).getContent()) works inside the Handler while mine doesn't. Any other thoughts? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Digicert signed https certificate throwing SSLException (Not trusted server certificate)
Solved my problem. Turns out I didn't have my intermediate certificates installed properly. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Https: CertPathValidatorException (TrustAnchor for CertPath not found)
The Error: Unexpected network error while connecting to web service: Not trusted server certificate javax.net.ssl.SSLException: Not trusted server certificate at org.apache.harmony.xnet.provider.jsse.OpenSSLSocketImpl.startHandshake (OpenSSLSocketImpl.java:363) . Caused by: java.security.cert.CertificateException: java.security.cert.CertPathValidatorException: TrustAnchor for CertPath not found. ... The Question: There are discussions all around about problems when https connecting Android to validly signed servers, but nobody has found an effective solution besides bypassing the certificate validation process. And I'm not talking about the understandably questionable self-signed certificates. I'm connecting to a DigiCert-signed server so I don't see what the problem is. DigiCert appears to be a widely used certificate signer so I can't believe all their certs are all invalid on Android. That leads me to another possible answer: that Android is misprocessing some part of DigiCert-signed certificates. This would appear to be true as the error above talks about TrustAnchor for CertPath not found. Sadly I have no idea what a TrustAnchor is or how the validate whether the CertPath is properly structured... Anybody...? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Service callback to Activity
Our application will expose a Service that can be called by Activities in other people's applications. In many cases, the parent applications calling Activity may be paused before our Service completes. I am looking for the best way for a Service to communicate back to the calling Activity that may have been paused. These are the known options: (1) Require calling Activities to have a registerReceiver() with a custom action and broadcast to that from our Service. The only way to secure this registerReceiver() is with a signature-based permission. As our Service communicates with any number of unknown 3rd party apps, we can't sign our Service's parent app with all these unknown certificates. These apps would therefore be exposing an unsecured registerReceiver() on their Activity. Would ideally like to avoid requiring this. (2) Create a PendingIntent to send results back to the activity and give it to our Service. Our Service would send data to calling Activity's onActivityResult(). Each time the result is delivered, the calling Activity will go through onPause() and onResume() but this should be OK. (3) The calling Activities could create a Handler. The Activity would then create a Messenger pointing to that Handler and send it to our service. Our Service can then use the Messenger to deliver our message back to the calling Activity. Any other ideas? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] AudioRecord works with short but static with byte
Any idea why reading bytes from AudioRecord would cause an error while
reading shorts would not? The sound comes through great with short
but I get only static with bytes.
Working code with short[]:
int minBufferSize = AudioRecord.getMinBufferSize(this.getSampleRate(),
this.getChannelConfiguration(),
this.getAudioEncoding());
AudioRecord recordInstance = new AudioRecord
(MediaRecorder.AudioSource.MIC,
this.getSampleRate(),
this.getChannelConfiguration(),
this.getAudioEncoding(),
minBufferSize );
bufferedStreamInstance = new BufferedOutputStream(new FileOutputStream
(this.pcmFile));
DataOutputStream dataOutputStreamInstance = new DataOutputStream
(bufferedStreamInstance);
short[] tempBuffer = new short[minBufferSize ];
recordInstance.startRecording();
while (totalBytesRead timeToRecord*sampleRate) {
bufferRead = recordInstance.read(tempBuffer, 0, minBufferSize );
for (int idxBuffer = 0; idxBuffer bufferRead; ++idxBuffer) {
dataOutputStreamInstance.writeShort(tempBuffer[idxBuffer]);
}
}
// Close resources…
recordInstance.stop();
bufferedStreamInstance.close();
If I just change these two lines though, I get static:
1) Change:
short[] tempBuffer = new short[minBufferSize];
To this:
byte[] tempBuffer = new byte[minBufferSize];
2) And this:
for (int idxBuffer = 0; idxBuffer bufferRead; ++idxBuffer) {
dataOutputStreamInstance.writeShort(tempBuffer[idxBuffer]);
}
To this:
dataOutputStreamInstance.write(tempBuffer, 0, bufferRead);
Anyone else experience this or have suggestions?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: AudioRecord works with short but static with byte
Interesting point, Jason. However I'm reading a byte at a time so each short is read (just one byte at a time). There shouldn't be anything leftover to be missed. More important though, I'm reading the byte[] using a method provided by Android's AudioRecord. read(byte[] audioData, int offsetInBytes, int sizeInBytes) Reads audio data from the audio hardware for recording into a buffer. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: AudioRecord works with short but static with byte
I agree Jason. It seems requesting the 16 bit format results in a short array being returned: AudioFormat.ENCODING_PCM_16BIT. For byte[], I would need to use this format: int audioEncodingFormat = AudioFormat.ENCODING_PCM_8BIT; Curiously it seems that AudioFormat.ENCODING_PCM_8BIT doesn't seem to work. Other people have posted problems using AudioFormat.ENCODING_PCM_8BIT. Guess I'll stick with AudioFormat.ENCODING_PCM_16BIT and covert to bytes afterwards: pcmData[totalBytesRead] = (byte) tempBuffer[idxBuffer]; pcmData[totalBytesRead+1] = (byte) (tempBuffer[idxBuffer] 8); totalBytesRead += 2; -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Performance issue: Dalvik VM is 20x slower than most modern Java VMs
The Dalvik JIT appears to result in a 1.7x improvement when run on an armv7. Here's the post from the Android team: http://groups.google.com/group/android-platform/browse_thread/thread/331d5f5636f5f532/dee6e0a81ae72264?#dee6e0a81ae72264 The Android team's independent benchmark results are here (done by 0xlab): http://groups.google.com/group/0xlab-devel/browse_thread/thread/1edef26f4e5b7427 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Performance issue: Dalvik VM is 20x slower than most modern Java VMs
Hi dm1973, Actually these tests are not useless. Of course good modern compilers should optimize away the code above. The reality is that the Android compiler is not a good compiler so it does not optimize the above code. This allows the simple example above to show the performance limitations of the Dalvik compiler. The point of my sample code above is to quickly show the Dalvik vs C performance without showing all the extraneous supporting code for running the test. It's easy enough to subtly change the example posted above so it doesn't get optimized away though even by a good compiler. I.e. simply return the value from the method above and post it to a text field in Android or log it in in C. I actually ran the tests that way (where the processing is not optimized away) to get the results that I posted above. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Performance issue: Dalvik VM is 20x slower than most modern Java VMs
Just following up to my initial post, I have implemented the above look in native code using Android's SDK. The native code performs in a few milliseconds as hoped. This goes to confirm that for compute intensive tasks, Dalvik can be hundreds of times slower than native. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Performance issue: Dalvik VM is 20x slower than most modern Java VMs
I'm writing a processing intensive digital sound processing app
(requires numerous (50,000) Fast Fourier Transforms - FFT). This
challenge led me to perform basic performance tests of Android running
on an HTC Hero.
The results show the Dalvik VM to be 20 times slower than a modern
JIT-enabled JVM running J2ME and 25-50 times slower than a C program
performing the same operations on a similarly powered mobile phone.
For example, this simple iteration over an empty method 2 million
times takes 1.4 seconds even though it doesn’t do anything. The same
iteration is performed in milliseconds by a C program and about 100ms
on a modern JVM
public void performanceTest1() {
for (int i = 0; i 200; i++) {
emptyMethod();
}
}
private int emptyMethod() {
return 0;
}
Doing something a little more complex like calculating the imaginary
component of a complex conjugate 2 million times takes 3.2 seconds.
Again, this takes milliseconds on other mobile phones running J2ME or
C.
public void performanceTest2() {
for (int i = 0; i 200; i++) {
int a = 5;
int b = 5;
int c = 5;
int x = 5;
int y = 5;
y = ((a 16) * ((c 16) 16)) + (((a 0X) * ((c
16) 16)) 16);
y = -y;
y += ((b 16) * (c 16)) + (((b 0X) * (c 16))
16);
}
}
Has anyone else been able to overcome these performance issues of
Android?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Performance issue: Dalvik VM is 20x slower than most modern Java VMs
Thanks Niko, I've been researching the NDK and am about to run the same performance tests there as well. I really didn't want to add the additional complexity of the NDK but seems that might be the only solution. I found a blog documenting the same performance issues so it appears my own findings aren't completely whacked: http://occipital.com/blog/2008/10/31/android-performance-2-loop-speed-and-the-dalvik-vm/ Cheers, Anthony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Classes missing from .apk file
My Eclipse has been working with Android for a couple years, but all of a sudden I got this strange bug: I needed to update an old Android 1.0 project to 1.5 so I created a new project in Eclipse and copied my old files into this new project. Everything compiled fine but when I launched the emulator, I got an error that it couldn't find any of my .class files. I looked at my .apk and it has all my layout and image files but none of my .class files. Any suggestions on what might be wrong? The compiled .classes are in my /bin directory but are somehow not being packaged into the .apk Thanks, Anthony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Classes missing from .apk file
Note: I did a fresh clean and rebuild but that hasn't helped either... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Classes missing from .apk file
OK...maybe my question was posed improperly. It seems the .apk doesn't contain individual class files. Instead the .class files are first compressed into classes.dex which is then packaged into the .apk. My .apk does have a classes.dex so supposedly my classes are in the .apk. That still doesn't explain why my .class files are not being found my the emulator...! Aaaarrgh...it all compiles too... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Why must WebView display local files via a ContentProvider?
In case you hadn't heard, WebView won't display local files directly via loadUrl(file://YOUR_PATH/file.html). All the solutions create a ContentProvider to access the local files and send them to a WebView using ContentProvider.openFile(). This approach seems less secure than simply sending my locally created application files files directly to WebView. My app creates and stores the files in my sandboxed local file directory so they should be inaccessible to anyone and thus secure. I know the standard response for why this is: That WebView's access to local files would be insecure. But why is it safer to wrap files into a ContentProvider and then feed them to WebView when the purpose of a ContentProviders is mostly to share content between apps.. .which I won't be doing? So my questions: 1) What was wrong with the local file solution for WebView.loadUrl(). 2) Why is it safer to wrap my local files into a ContentProvider? Thanks, Anthony --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: ArrayAdapter
I used notifyDataSetChanged() and it works fine for me. Here's my
complete code with the notifyDataSetChanged() at the bottom in the
selection listener:
package com.pocketjourney.location.map;
import java.util.List;
import android.content.Context;
import android.view.LayoutInflater;
import android.view.View;
import android.view.ViewGroup;
import android.widget.AdapterView;
import android.widget.BaseAdapter;
import android.widget.ImageView;
import android.widget.ListView;
import android.widget.TextView;
import android.widget.AdapterView.OnItemClickListener;
import com.pocketjourney.R;
import com.pocketjourney.location.DestinationModel;
public class DestinationTypesListAdapter extends BaseAdapter
implements OnItemClickListener
{
private ListStringallTypes, activeTypes;
private ListView destinationTypeList;
public DestinationTypesListAdapter(ListView destinationTypeList)
{
this.destinationTypeList = destinationTypeList;
this.allTypes = DestinationModel.getAllDestinationTypes();
this.activeTypes = DestinationModel.getActiveDestinationTypes();
destinationTypeList.setOnItemClickListener(this);
}
public View getView(int position, View convertView, ViewGroup
parent)
{
View destinationTypeLabel = null;
if ( convertView == null )
{
LayoutInflater inflater =
(LayoutInflater)parent.getContext().getSystemService(Context.LAYOUT_INFLATER_SERVICE);
destinationTypeLabel =
inflater.inflate(R.layout.list_item_destination_type, null);
} else {
destinationTypeLabel = convertView;
}
String destinationType = (String) getItem(position);
TextView destinationTypeText = (TextView)
destinationTypeLabel.findViewById(R.id.destination_type);
destinationTypeText.setText(destinationType);
ImageView typeSelectedImage= (ImageView)
destinationTypeLabel.findViewById(R.id.destination_type_selected);
if (activeTypes.contains(destinationType)) {
typeSelectedImage.setImageResource(R.drawable.list_selection_checkmark);
} else {
typeSelectedImage.setImageResource(R.drawable.empty);
}
return destinationTypeLabel;
}
public int getCount()
{
return allTypes.size();
}
@Override
public Object getItem(int position)
{
return allTypes.get(position);
}
@Override
public long getItemId(int position) {
// We can simply use the array index as a unique id.
return position;
}
/**
* Implementation of OnItemClickListener
*/
@Override
public void onItemClick(AdapterView adapterView, View view, int
position, long id)
{
String destinationType = (String) getItem(position);
if (activeTypes.contains(destinationType)) {
activeTypes.remove(destinationType);
} else {
activeTypes.add(destinationType);
}
DestinationModel.setActiveDestinationTypes(activeTypes);
notifyDataSetChanged();
}
}
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: What's the Cost ??
The lock may be built into the phone's ROM...so a rebuild of Android's source code won't work. As the G1 runs on T-Mobile's 3G which uses a different 3G bandwidth than ATT's, you'll be stuck with the EDGE network if you use your ATT SIM in your T-Mobile G1. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: java.lang.VerifyError
Tracked down this bug in my own code. Turns out that my .jar file was incomplete (missing a .class file). Now that the .class is added back, all works fine. - Anthony --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: anyone has problem with verifyError?
Tracked down the same VerifyError in my own code. Turns out that my .jar file was incomplete (missing a .class file). Now that the .class is added back, all works fine. You might get this error if your .jar is not properly added to the project as well. - Anthony --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: problem with verifier
Tracked down the same VerifyError in my own code. Turns out that my .jar file was incomplete (missing a .class file). Now that the .class is added back, all works fine. You might get this error if your .jar is not properly added to the project as well. - Anthony --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: java.lang.VerifyError with 0.9
Tracked down the same VerifyError in my own code. Turns out that my .jar file was incomplete (missing a .class file). Now that the .class is added back, all works fine. - Anthony --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: anyone has problem with verifyError?
I'm getting this same VerifyError: WARN/dalvikvm(2026): VFY: unable to resolve static method 804: Lcom/ pocketjourney/view/util/HtmlUtils;.shortenHtml (Ljava/lang/ String;I)Ljava/lang/String; WARN/dalvikvm(2026): VFY: rejecting opcode 0x71 at 0x0022 WARN/dalvikvm(2026): VFY: rejected Lcom/pocketjourney/model/ businessobject/Journey;.init (Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/ String;Lcom/pocketjourney/model/businessobject/JourneyGuide;Lcom/ pocketjourney/model/location/City;)V WARN/dalvikvm(2026): Verifier rejected class Lcom/pocketjourney/model/ businessobject/Journey; Is anyone else solved this problem? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: java.lang.VerifyError
Same problem here. Is there a PERMISSION variable that must be set in the manifest.xml file or something? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: About highlightbar in the List
I'm still confused as to why touching the screen does not show a highlight. Is there a usability reason for this or is it a technical limitation? From my POV, a highlight on touch would seem the most natural approach. - Biosopher --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: 3 new Android tutorials on how to build a service enabled Android app
My guess is your online multi-player game is checking a remote server to see what actions other users are taking. All those server calls responses should be performed in a Service. Is that what you were asking about? Biosopher --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: LifeCycleDemo - android.app.Activity
Thanks for the video, Damien. I just posted about the video on my own blog so you should be getting more traffic sent your way: http://blog.pocketjourney.com Cheers, Biosopher --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: SDK Update?
We need regular updates...especially because this isn't a shipped product so Google should be providing updates more rapidly. Google's stated approach to dev rapid prototyping so they should be putting out 2 new SDKs for each Apple SDK. That said, I'm glad they didn't put out one during the last month of the Round One Challenge. A new release might have broken one of the many work arounds I'd created for the many issues I addressed for submitting for Round 1. Now though, I hope many of those bugs have been squashed in the past 2 months. SO! Please give us the new SDK as I'm sure I'm no different from other developers...holding off dev until the new release comes out. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android Developer Registry
So in the meantime, all interested developers should post their background/stats info here as described in the initial posting. Biosopher --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] New tutorial: Image Text-Only Buttons
There are some great Android screenshots out there! I've been working on improving Pocket Journey's UI as I previously focused mostly on the MediaPlayer functionality. I now want to pass on a few new UI techniques I've uncovered. This new tutorial is very simple and will add to your UI (user interface) development arsenal. How? Buttons that display as simple text or as images are basic elements of any application. By following the two steps below, these buttons can be easily created with Android by simply extending the current Button and ImageButton classes. You can see the tutorial here: blog.pocketjourney.com Cheers, Biosopher --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android Developer Registry
I’ll go first to kickoff the registry. Here are my stats: Level: Senior Developer Android Skills: Maps, UI component design (user interface), GPS, MediaPlayer, server-side (JSP/Struts/Ajax) Project: www.pocketjourney.com Contribution to above: Founder, CTO, and lead developer Availability: I am available part/full time depending on project compensation Home: San Francisco, California Email: anthony @ pocketjourney dot com Side note: Just to clarify, Pocket Journey is a long-term vision dependent on widespread consumer adoption of GPS-enabled mobile phones with open APIs (currently only Android). 'Consumer' is the key here so all of us Android geeks don’t count). That means I'll have spare time to work on other Android side projects. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android Developer Registry
Thanks Shane. I tried to find a similar registry at SlideMe.org but couldn't see anything like I've suggested above. Biosopher --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: iPhone SDK lacks mapping function
I'm still digging into the iPhone SDK versus Android diffs. As you can imagine though, the iPhone's media support is substantially better than what Android has. Makes sense though. The iPhone is a mobile media play while Android is more of a location-based media play. If you're a pure media application provider though, I'd port my Android app to the iPhone and start taking advantage of the 6,000,000+ iPhones out there. More differences as I find them. Anthony --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] iPhone SDK lacks mapping function
Yes...you read this post's title correctly. The iPhone SDK lacks the basic mapping API required by application developers hoping to tie the mobile experience to a geo-specific location. The only mapping function provided by the iPhone SDK is to send a URL to the iPhone's built-in Google map application and to let Google handle the rest. I learned this while researching the iPhone SDK in comparison to the Android OS. I wanted to determine how difficult it would be to port Pocket Journey to the iPhone. As it turns out, the port could never happen as it couldn't for the majority of the apps submitted to the Android Challenge. If you want, you can read more about this discovery here: blog.pocketjourney.com. Cheers, Biosopher --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Add more features on my application
Good luck Moussa, Great name...hope to have it on my phone sometime. Anthony --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Add more features on my application
My app requires interaction with the server so I can at minimum tell you that the judges haven't launched my application yet as there have been no hits to my sever yet. And I don't believe my app (pocket journey) is so awful that it won't get at least an initial run- through. Moussa, I saw in another post that you have a 10 person team working on your app. Have you announced your app publicly yet? Anthony --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Good Luck to everyone !
Ditto to all that. It's been a strange wild trip that I never expected when I first heard about Android... Kudos to the Google Crew for creating such an engaging dev experience. Also a massive high-five to everyone that setup the external sites as well. I spent many an hour surfing this forum but many more on AndDev, OpenAndroid, and the many smaller blogs where people offered their bits of programming wisdom. Best of luck to everyone. Me? I'll be back here coding away in a couple weeks, but for now I have planned a 2 week siesta to let my wrists head heal.. Anthony --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Open for Tutorial Requests
Pocket Journey would never have made it without all the tutorials and discussions people have posted. I've created a few tutorials myself, but wanted to make an offer to help some of you as the deadline nears. I just posted an announcement video screenshots of Pocket Journey: www.pocketjourney.com/androidVideo.do If there's anything on the video or screenshots that you find of interest, let me know I'll do my best to get another tutorial out to help you. The few tutorials I've created already cover some of the coding techniques shown in the screenshots: www.pocketjourney.com/androidTutorials.do Of course, a major effort of Pocket Journey has been getting a community of content created to populate the application along with server-side data feeds to send the information. That tutorial would have to be about partnering and marketing. ; - ) Anthony --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
