[android-developers] Escalate extension dialing (Issue 7514)
How can we get a developer to look at being able to dial an extension like 800-555-1212x3452? It looks like a simple provlem to fix. http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=7514 android.telephony.PhoneNumberUtils maybe: isStartsPostDial -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] C2DM registration ID refresh
In the C2DM documentation (Android Cloud to Device Messaging Framework - Google Projects for Android), it mentions that: Note that Google may periodically refresh the registration ID, so you should design your application with the understanding that the REGISTRATION Intent may be called multiple times. Your application needs to be able to respond accordingly. Does this mean an Android application will be notified through the REGISTRATION Intent when C2DM server refreshes the registration ID? Then the application can send the new ID to the application server? Or the application server will only find out the registration ID is no longer valid when it tries to send a message through the C2DM server. Thanks. David. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Proguard problem after 2.3 update
Same problem, same message. If I knew I would have all this trouble, I
wouldn't have updated the android SDK. Even the docs are somewhat
outdated, wrong file names now (no big deal here, but it all adds up).
On 22 dez, 11:30, licorna lico...@gmail.com wrote:
I've tried different setting with no success:
- I've set PROGUARD_HOME AND proguard.dir (in local.properties) to:
a) proguard included with SDK, b) proguard 4.5 --stable-- c) proguard
4.6 --beta-- both HOME and /lib directories
- I'm using ant 1.8.1 (ant -version)
After changing proguard.dir to proguard_dir/lib I'm getting another
error: Expecting class path separator ':' before '{' in argument
number 1
I've lost almost an entire day trying to make this work!
Thanks!
On Dec 21, 7:15 pm, Fred Grott(Android
Expert,http://mobilebytes.wordpress.com)
fred.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
set PROGUARD_HOME to point to the proguard in your android sdk install..
I also had to do a manual ant 1.81 install on Ubuntu 10.04.1 Ubuntu 11 will
have ant 1.8 but Eclipse 3.7 will not have ant 1.81. until the end of the
beta process...ie May 2011..
I use a plugin called wickedshell to run ant 1.8.1 from shell in eclipse..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Device Seeding Program for Top Android Market Developers
Crazy, I received the same message has you : All of the phones have been shipped already. Please be patient; if your phone has not arrived yet, it is probably in transit and will arrive shortly. I am sorry, but we cannot provide individual tracking numbers for each phone. Thanks, Neel Automatic reply ? Not really fairplay... :-) David On Apr 8, 4:28 pm, gambiting gambit...@gmail.com wrote: I'm in Poland and I sent the email to google yesterday, the reply received today was: Wojciech, All of the phones have been shipped already. Please be patient; if your phone has not arrived yet, it is probably in transit and will arrive shortly. I am sorry, but we cannot provide individual tracking numbers for each phone. Thanks, Neel I guess we just have to be more patient :-) Anyhow,that's a free phone! On 8 Kwi, 10:40, fhucho fhu...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, I put the second paragraph in my previous post accidentaly... On Apr 8, 9:07 am, fhucho fhu...@gmail.com wrote: I received something similar, the only additional info is that A lot of people in Europe have received their phones already. I'd wait another couple weeks; trust me, there is a phone assigned to you and it will get to you in due time. On Apr 8, 5:38 am, Disconnect dc.disconn...@gmail.com wrote: This is getting me too :/ Its nice that its a free month, but it'd be better if it could be used ;) On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Dan Sherman impact...@gmail.com wrote: Has anyone been able to get their Droid transferred off the free month of service (through a Google Account), and onto their personal Verizon account? - Dan On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Thomas Riley tomrile...@googlemail.comwrote: I just had a similar email. If your reading this Neel, thanks for the reply! Tom. On Apr 8, 12:38 am, Richard rtaylor...@googlemail.com wrote: I sent an email to Google, this is the reply: Hi Richard, No one has been forgotten. There's a large volume of phones being shipped out, and apparently we overestimated the capacity of our shipping vendor. We have sent them the addresses and the inventory and they are working through the list. I'd wait another couple weeks; trust me, there is a phone assigned to you and it will get to you in due time. Thanks, Neel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comandroid-developers%2Bunsubs cr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en To unsubscribe, reply using remove me as the subject. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comandroid-developers%2Bunsubs cr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Update application from the Android Market
so how could you explain me that people that updated their app don't have new feature until reboot of the phone... sorry guys... i faced the same problem with different application updates... (Meridian, Android Fortunes. etc) David On May 6, 9:10 am, Dianne Hackborn hack...@android.com wrote: You are wrong, when installing an update all processes of the current version are killed. You can test this yourself by doing adb install -r path-to-apk On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:30 AM, David C dcampi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, After different testing, I found an issue with the update method when installing an application update. I developped DilbertDroid, and a lot of people are saying that there is missing some functionnality but the latest version published on the market have this functionnalities. I suppose that when updating a application, the updater doesn't kill the process related to the application but only update the application files on phone. Result: the old application is still running until you kill the process or reboot the system. I think it is not very professionnal to tell user to deinstall and then reboot their phone in order to install an update. David PS: My application doesn't have any service running -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer hack...@android.com Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Update application from the Android Market
Hi, After different testing, I found an issue with the update method when installing an application update. I developped DilbertDroid, and a lot of people are saying that there is missing some functionnality but the latest version published on the market have this functionnalities. I suppose that when updating a application, the updater doesn't kill the process related to the application but only update the application files on phone. Result: the old application is still running until you kill the process or reboot the system. I think it is not very professionnal to tell user to deinstall and then reboot their phone in order to install an update. David PS: My application doesn't have any service running --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Rotate MapView
I just received this response: Override a ViewGroup and apply the rotation in dispatchDraw(). Thanks Romain! On Dec 8, 12:43 pm, David C da...@scotinus.com wrote: Bump can anyone provide insight here? Did the MapView onDraw() API change to final at some point? If the recommended method to rotate a MapView is canvas.rotate() how can that be achieved if not via onDraw()? Personally I'd prefer to see the MapView API extended to support setBearing() or something similar, but nothing like that exists. sigh On Dec 7, 11:23 am, David C da...@scotinus.com wrote: A few threads have discussed using canvas.rotate() as a means to rotate a MapView. However, onDraw() is declared final for MapView and so can't be over-ridden. Is there an alternative way to manipulate the MapView canvas than from onDraw()? Thanks, David --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Rotate MapView
Bump can anyone provide insight here? Did the MapView onDraw() API change to final at some point? If the recommended method to rotate a MapView is canvas.rotate() how can that be achieved if not via onDraw()? Personally I'd prefer to see the MapView API extended to support setBearing() or something similar, but nothing like that exists. sigh On Dec 7, 11:23 am, David C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A few threads have discussed using canvas.rotate() as a means to rotate a MapView. However, onDraw() is declared final for MapView and so can't be over-ridden. Is there an alternative way to manipulate the MapView canvas than from onDraw()? Thanks, David --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Rotate MapView
A few threads have discussed using canvas.rotate() as a means to rotate a MapView. However, onDraw() is declared final for MapView and so can't be over-ridden. Is there an alternative way to manipulate the MapView canvas than from onDraw()? Thanks, David --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Weird Map Problem (Controlling same map)
Sounds like your maps share some common underlying resource. Not sure if that would be a defect or by design. Perhaps you can manually call onSaveInstanceState() and onRestoreInstanceState() to save / restore the respective maps state as needed? http://code.google.com/android/reference/com/google/android/maps/MapView.html#onRestoreInstanceState(android.os.Bundle) On Dec 7, 2:41 pm, mscwd01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone? I cant work out what is causing this... On Dec 7, 5:16 pm, mscwd01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a weird issue, which is probably easily solvable - but the cause is alluding me. I have two activities, one is created as an intent from the first activity. Each activity features a MapView. My problem is that if I move the first map (i.e. navigate to a paricular city) the second map, when viewed, has also moved to display the same place I navigated to in the first map. Reversly, if I move the second map to another place when I go back to the first map, this too, has changed to display the same location I navigated to on the second map... confused? ;) Basically I have two MapViews with different id values but they act as if they are the same map. I need two distinct, individual maps that do not control one another. Am I missing something obvious or do I have to add something to stop them doing this? Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Disappearing Zoom Controls
I have added ZoomControls to a MapView using addView(). When my activity loads the controls appear briefly but then disappear, never to be seen again. There only seems to be one discussion on this group but it didn't explicitly address this issue. Can anyone explain why this happens, and how it can be avoided so the controls persist? Also, is the mechanism that causes this documented anywhere (so for example, the delay to disappearance could be controlled)? There's nothing mentioned in the ZoomControls docs or its super-classes (that I've found) I've been going round in circles for more than a day on this with no success. Thanks! David --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Disappearing Zoom Controls
Thanks for the response Mark. I hadn't made the map clickable so had no way to return the controls. Fixing that solved the problem. It still seems a bit odd that the behaviour is neither configurable nor documented. Oh well - I suppose I could always design my own controls if needed. Thanks again! David On Oct 20, 5:48 pm, Mark Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David C wrote: I have added ZoomControls to a MapView using addView(). When my activity loads the controls appear briefly but then disappear, never to be seen again. There only seems to be one discussion on this group but it didn't explicitly address this issue. Can anyone explain why this happens, and how it can be avoided so the controls persist? Since we can't see your code, it's a little tough to answer your question. So let me tell you what works for me: 1. Put something in your layout for the zoom controls: RelativeLayout xmlns:android=http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android; android:layout_width=fill_parent android:layout_height=fill_parent com.google.android.maps.MapView android:id=@+id/map android:layout_width=fill_parent android:layout_height=fill_parent android:apiKey=NooYawk android:clickable=true / LinearLayout android:id=@+id/zoom android:layout_width=wrap_content android:layout_height=wrap_content android:layout_alignParentBottom=true android:layout_alignParentLeft=true / /RelativeLayout 2. Add the actual zoom controls to your container: ViewGroup zoom=(ViewGroup)findViewById(R.id.zoom); zoom.addView(map.getZoomControls()); When I click in the area for the zoom controls (lower left in the example shown above), the controls appear for ~2 seconds, or ~2 seconds after I last interact with them (if I'm actually working the controls). And they reappear the same way. -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy)http://commonsware.com Android Training on the Ranch! -- Mar 16-20, 2009http://www.bignerdranch.com/schedule.shtml --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] G1 Review by PC World
Apologies if this is considered off topic, but it seems relevant. PC World review the G1 here: http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/152339/the_g1_is_no_iphone_but_android_has_promise.html My summary of the review is this: - Hardware doesn't match up to the I-phone but the software is nice. - Open platform holds promise but decent apps are limited due to the lack of an Android store. - Camera really sucks (way too dark). - Long-click concept is good - Has perhaps too much of a google-centric feel --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
