Re: [android-developers] Re: Android 2.3 Vs 3.0
Hi siva, If a OEM is writting its own library or whatever, it should pass CTS testcases. Then only it will be a google branded phone. If it is google branded phone then it is made sure that all apps in the market are going to work. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android 2.3 Vs 3.0
ya...rightwhat if some one writes differently...say instead of Android Bndroid ? or Cndroid? Very difficult to handle but easy to ignore. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.3 Vs 3.0
My guess is that the Xoom will be SDK Level 11 and whatever they are calling 2.4 will either be 11 or 12, albeit some of the new API may effecitvely be a NOP when running on phones, like the new title bar stuff. That's the only way I can see the SDK not forking. On Feb 20, 1:10 am, Sivaprakash sivaprakashshanmu...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/perlow/android-30-hell-yes-its-a-fork-but-w... On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Elvis tspiel...@gmail.com wrote: You can get the 2.3.3 API10 from the windows SDK and loop mount the .img files + copy out what you need or start the SDK emulator and use androidcommander to pull out what you need. 2.3.3 still needs some work. This runs fine on my phone Samsung touchwiz phone. How: You will need a working init file from your current froyo / ginger + kernel image and then use the /sbin and /system folder to create a new version for you phone. All other folders can be generated by modifying the init.rc script and setting correct permissions or you might be able to copy some folders like data dev proc ect and symlink others. making it into a flash-able rom file you will need to look at samdroid or cyanogen websites for more info. If not sure use the one running on my phone it is on github and go from there. 2.3.3 is very nice when running on a non android converted phone. Wifi and bluetooth might have issues unless you use the same Froyo method to make it work, lcd density defaults to 160 even if setting it in build.prop . You might be able to do the same with Honeycomb on your phone as it seems to have gms data wifi and other options available in the sdk. Hope this helps, happy modding and no need to wait for some future Xoom phone. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- - Prakash.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android 2.3 Vs 3.0
Nobody is calling anything 2.4. Again, unless there is an official announcement, anything you hear from other companies is a rumor and likely to be misleading as it is anything else. On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Zsolt Vasvari zvasv...@gmail.com wrote: My guess is that the Xoom will be SDK Level 11 and whatever they are calling 2.4 will either be 11 or 12, albeit some of the new API may effecitvely be a NOP when running on phones, like the new title bar stuff. That's the only way I can see the SDK not forking. On Feb 20, 1:10 am, Sivaprakash sivaprakashshanmu...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/perlow/android-30-hell-yes-its-a-fork-but-w... On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Elvis tspiel...@gmail.com wrote: You can get the 2.3.3 API10 from the windows SDK and loop mount the .img files + copy out what you need or start the SDK emulator and use androidcommander to pull out what you need. 2.3.3 still needs some work. This runs fine on my phone Samsung touchwiz phone. How: You will need a working init file from your current froyo / ginger + kernel image and then use the /sbin and /system folder to create a new version for you phone. All other folders can be generated by modifying the init.rc script and setting correct permissions or you might be able to copy some folders like data dev proc ect and symlink others. making it into a flash-able rom file you will need to look at samdroid or cyanogen websites for more info. If not sure use the one running on my phone it is on github and go from there. 2.3.3 is very nice when running on a non android converted phone. Wifi and bluetooth might have issues unless you use the same Froyo method to make it work, lcd density defaults to 160 even if setting it in build.prop . You might be able to do the same with Honeycomb on your phone as it seems to have gms data wifi and other options available in the sdk. Hope this helps, happy modding and no need to wait for some future Xoom phone. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- - Prakash.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer hack...@android.com Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.3 Vs 3.0
I understand that. The 2.4 rumor came from some HTC documents, but now they appear to have been just a typo. On Feb 21, 1:27 am, Dianne Hackborn hack...@android.com wrote: Nobody is calling anything 2.4. Again, unless there is an official announcement, anything you hear from other companies is a rumor and likely to be misleading as it is anything else. On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Zsolt Vasvari zvasv...@gmail.com wrote: My guess is that the Xoom will be SDK Level 11 and whatever they are calling 2.4 will either be 11 or 12, albeit some of the new API may effecitvely be a NOP when running on phones, like the new title bar stuff. That's the only way I can see the SDK not forking. On Feb 20, 1:10 am, Sivaprakash sivaprakashshanmu...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/perlow/android-30-hell-yes-its-a-fork-but-w... On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Elvis tspiel...@gmail.com wrote: You can get the 2.3.3 API10 from the windows SDK and loop mount the .img files + copy out what you need or start the SDK emulator and use androidcommander to pull out what you need. 2.3.3 still needs some work. This runs fine on my phone Samsung touchwiz phone. How: You will need a working init file from your current froyo / ginger + kernel image and then use the /sbin and /system folder to create a new version for you phone. All other folders can be generated by modifying the init.rc script and setting correct permissions or you might be able to copy some folders like data dev proc ect and symlink others. making it into a flash-able rom file you will need to look at samdroid or cyanogen websites for more info. If not sure use the one running on my phone it is on github and go from there. 2.3.3 is very nice when running on a non android converted phone. Wifi and bluetooth might have issues unless you use the same Froyo method to make it work, lcd density defaults to 160 even if setting it in build.prop . You might be able to do the same with Honeycomb on your phone as it seems to have gms data wifi and other options available in the sdk. Hope this helps, happy modding and no need to wait for some future Xoom phone. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- - Prakash.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer hack...@android.com Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.3 Vs 3.0
You can get the 2.3.3 API10 from the windows SDK and loop mount the .img files + copy out what you need or start the SDK emulator and use androidcommander to pull out what you need. 2.3.3 still needs some work. This runs fine on my phone Samsung touchwiz phone. How: You will need a working init file from your current froyo / ginger + kernel image and then use the /sbin and /system folder to create a new version for you phone. All other folders can be generated by modifying the init.rc script and setting correct permissions or you might be able to copy some folders like data dev proc ect and symlink others. making it into a flash-able rom file you will need to look at samdroid or cyanogen websites for more info. If not sure use the one running on my phone it is on github and go from there. 2.3.3 is very nice when running on a non android converted phone. Wifi and bluetooth might have issues unless you use the same Froyo method to make it work, lcd density defaults to 160 even if setting it in build.prop . You might be able to do the same with Honeycomb on your phone as it seems to have gms data wifi and other options available in the sdk. Hope this helps, happy modding and no need to wait for some future Xoom phone. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android 2.3 Vs 3.0
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/perlow/android-30-hell-yes-its-a-fork-but-who-cares/15703 On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Elvis tspiel...@gmail.com wrote: You can get the 2.3.3 API10 from the windows SDK and loop mount the .img files + copy out what you need or start the SDK emulator and use androidcommander to pull out what you need. 2.3.3 still needs some work. This runs fine on my phone Samsung touchwiz phone. How: You will need a working init file from your current froyo / ginger + kernel image and then use the /sbin and /system folder to create a new version for you phone. All other folders can be generated by modifying the init.rc script and setting correct permissions or you might be able to copy some folders like data dev proc ect and symlink others. making it into a flash-able rom file you will need to look at samdroid or cyanogen websites for more info. If not sure use the one running on my phone it is on github and go from there. 2.3.3 is very nice when running on a non android converted phone. Wifi and bluetooth might have issues unless you use the same Froyo method to make it work, lcd density defaults to 160 even if setting it in build.prop . You might be able to do the same with Honeycomb on your phone as it seems to have gms data wifi and other options available in the sdk. Hope this helps, happy modding and no need to wait for some future Xoom phone. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- - Prakash. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android 2.3 Vs 3.0
If you really look at the fact for Apple device manufacturer is one guy that is Apple. But that is the not the case for Android, if Google has multiple versions dont you think that it will become an issue for a developer in terms of testing the application in multiple device just in case if any of the OEM writes different layout library on top of Android for their Device? On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Kevin Duffey andjar...@gmail.com wrote: Apple's iPad was really just to support bigger screens, but had less functionality than the iPhone os. The opposite is happening here.. Android 3.0 is a much better UI and more features. That to me is one of the biggest reasons Android tablets are going to beat iPads... not only is the UI more tailored towards tablets and information at our fingertips, it's not quite identical to small screen phone devices. We truly get a more tablet oriented OS while still maintaining the ability to write code for both with.. as far as I can figure out, no changes other than for screen resolution. On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Ed Burnette ed.burne...@gmail.comwrote: The phone and tablet source trees have diverged temporarily but it's expected that the I version of Android will bring them back together. The version number hasn't been decided - it might become 3.1 or 3.5 or something else - just not 3.0. So when somebody says Honeycomb is just for tablets and won't run on phones they're just saying that a particular version of Android is just for tablets. There will be lots of versions after Honeycomb. Apple did something similar with iOS - they had an iPad only release and then a few months later came back with a phone-only release and finally they had a converged release. On Feb 14, 11:55 pm, Sivaprakash sivaprakashshanmu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Read from few of the articles that Google has forked Android is it so ? Which means I can not use 3.0 for my Phone application but only for Tablet? Thanks Siva -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- - Prakash. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android 2.3 Vs 3.0
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Sivaprakash sivaprakashshanmu...@gmail.com wrote: if Google has multiple versions dont you think that it will become an issue for a developer in terms of testing the application in multiple device just in case if any of the OEM writes different layout library on top of Android for their Device? And this is different from the current situation ... how? - TreKing http://sites.google.com/site/rezmobileapps/treking - Chicago transit tracking app for Android-powered devices -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android 2.3 Vs 3.0
writes a different layout library?? On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Sivaprakash sivaprakashshanmu...@gmail.com wrote: If you really look at the fact for Apple device manufacturer is one guy that is Apple. But that is the not the case for Android, if Google has multiple versions dont you think that it will become an issue for a developer in terms of testing the application in multiple device just in case if any of the OEM writes different layout library on top of Android for their Device? On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Kevin Duffey andjar...@gmail.comwrote: Apple's iPad was really just to support bigger screens, but had less functionality than the iPhone os. The opposite is happening here.. Android 3.0 is a much better UI and more features. That to me is one of the biggest reasons Android tablets are going to beat iPads... not only is the UI more tailored towards tablets and information at our fingertips, it's not quite identical to small screen phone devices. We truly get a more tablet oriented OS while still maintaining the ability to write code for both with.. as far as I can figure out, no changes other than for screen resolution. On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Ed Burnette ed.burne...@gmail.comwrote: The phone and tablet source trees have diverged temporarily but it's expected that the I version of Android will bring them back together. The version number hasn't been decided - it might become 3.1 or 3.5 or something else - just not 3.0. So when somebody says Honeycomb is just for tablets and won't run on phones they're just saying that a particular version of Android is just for tablets. There will be lots of versions after Honeycomb. Apple did something similar with iOS - they had an iPad only release and then a few months later came back with a phone-only release and finally they had a converged release. On Feb 14, 11:55 pm, Sivaprakash sivaprakashshanmu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Read from few of the articles that Google has forked Android is it so ? Which means I can not use 3.0 for my Phone application but only for Tablet? Thanks Siva -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- - Prakash. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer hack...@android.com Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.3 Vs 3.0
But then how is this not a fork? If what we now call 3.0 is only for tablets, what are we going to call the version that includes 3.0 improvements but is NOT only for tablets? It can't be 3.0, since you already -released- 3.0. Or are you going to call it a 'branch' instead of a 'fork'? You call 3.0 the next version of Android, but there is only ONE next version. After that version, you have to call it something else. Or you have to have subversions. Either way, that sound an awful lot like a 'fork'. On Feb 15, 12:53 pm, Dianne Hackborn hack...@android.com wrote: 3.0 is the next version of Android. It is currently only for tablets. It is not a fork. On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Sivaprakash sivaprakashshanmu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Read from few of the articles that Google has forked Android is it so ? Which means I can not use 3.0 for my Phone application but only for Tablet? Thanks Siva -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer hack...@android.com Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android 2.3 Vs 3.0
Since 3.0 is the *only* version of Android after 2.3, it's not a fork. By definition. I think we (developers) should all stop worrying and wait until after the Xoom ships. The Android team pulled off 10 releases (or more, depending on how you count), I'm sure they have a plan for whatever happens next. -- Kostya Vasilyev -- http://kmansoft.wordpress.com 18.02.2011 23:49 пользователь Indicator Veritatis mej1...@yahoo.com написал: But then how is this not a fork? If what we now call 3.0 is only for tablets, what are we going to call the version that includes 3.0 improvements but is NOT only for tablets? It can't be 3.0, since you already -released- 3.0. Or are you going to call it a 'branch' instead of a 'fork'? You call 3.0 the next version of Android, but there is only ONE next version. After that version, you have to call it something else. Or you have to have subversions. Either way, that sound an awful lot like a 'fork'. On Feb 15, 12:53 pm, Dianne Hackborn hack...@android.com wrote: 3.0 is the next version of Android. It is currently only for tablets. It is not a fork. On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Sivaprakash sivaprakashshanmu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Read from few of the articles that Google has forked Android is it so ? Which means I can not use 3.0 for my Phone application but only for Tablet? Thanks Siva -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- Dianne Hackborn Android framework engineer hack...@android.com Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails. All such questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and answer them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android 2.3 Vs 3.0
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Indicator Veritatis mej1...@yahoo.comwrote: If what we now call 3.0 is only for tablets, what are we going to call the version that includes 3.0 improvements but is NOT only for tablets? It can't be 3.0, since you already -released- 3.0. Or are you going to call it a 'branch' instead of a 'fork'? Probably 3.x, where is x 0. or 4.0. That's generally how the increments roll. You call 3.0 the next version of Android, but there is only ONE next version. After that version, you have to call it something else. Or you have to have subversions. Either way, that sound an awful lot like a 'fork'. After the next version is released, next version becomes current version and a new next version emerges. 2.3 is currently only available on the Nexus S - does that make 2.3 a fork? - TreKing http://sites.google.com/site/rezmobileapps/treking - Chicago transit tracking app for Android-powered devices -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Android 2.3 Vs 3.0
The phone and tablet source trees have diverged temporarily but it's expected that the I version of Android will bring them back together. The version number hasn't been decided - it might become 3.1 or 3.5 or something else - just not 3.0. So when somebody says Honeycomb is just for tablets and won't run on phones they're just saying that a particular version of Android is just for tablets. There will be lots of versions after Honeycomb. Apple did something similar with iOS - they had an iPad only release and then a few months later came back with a phone-only release and finally they had a converged release. On Feb 14, 11:55 pm, Sivaprakash sivaprakashshanmu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Read from few of the articles that Google has forked Android is it so ? Which means I can not use 3.0 for my Phone application but only for Tablet? Thanks Siva -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
Re: [android-developers] Re: Android 2.3 Vs 3.0
Apple's iPad was really just to support bigger screens, but had less functionality than the iPhone os. The opposite is happening here.. Android 3.0 is a much better UI and more features. That to me is one of the biggest reasons Android tablets are going to beat iPads... not only is the UI more tailored towards tablets and information at our fingertips, it's not quite identical to small screen phone devices. We truly get a more tablet oriented OS while still maintaining the ability to write code for both with.. as far as I can figure out, no changes other than for screen resolution. On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Ed Burnette ed.burne...@gmail.com wrote: The phone and tablet source trees have diverged temporarily but it's expected that the I version of Android will bring them back together. The version number hasn't been decided - it might become 3.1 or 3.5 or something else - just not 3.0. So when somebody says Honeycomb is just for tablets and won't run on phones they're just saying that a particular version of Android is just for tablets. There will be lots of versions after Honeycomb. Apple did something similar with iOS - they had an iPad only release and then a few months later came back with a phone-only release and finally they had a converged release. On Feb 14, 11:55 pm, Sivaprakash sivaprakashshanmu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Read from few of the articles that Google has forked Android is it so ? Which means I can not use 3.0 for my Phone application but only for Tablet? Thanks Siva -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
