Hi Michael,
thanks a lot for your review, including two issues and the pull request!
On Mon, 2022-09-19 at 17:56 +0200, Michael Richardson wrote:
Hi, I've finished reading BRSKI-AE.
I made a pull request https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-ae/pull/25
with six small suggested wording changes, two of which are aasvg hacks.
I've merged them earlier today and then provided some minor fixups on them.
Unfortunately they lead to two technical problems that I was unable to solve,
so I added two issues:
* https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-ae/issues/26
* https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-ae/issues/27
I wanted Alternative Environment (and Asynchronous Enrollment) to bold or
underline the A and E in the HTML/PDF, but it seems that I don't really know
how to do that. I settled for *A*, which seems to result in italic, which
is really not what I expected.
This way easy to solve: just use, e.g., **A**
I numbered the arcs in figure 3 because Request/Response repeats confused
the pattern matcher in my brain.
Certainly helpful also to others.
I just had to replace [1] by (1) etc. because otherwise the square brackets
were (mis-)interpreted as references.
https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-ae/issues/24
which alternatives does this document actually standardize?
I think that we should merge sections 4.3 and 4.4, and just say that we are
extending for CMP, and leave the rest to fend for themselves.
I am fully with you.
What to do the other co-authors think?
https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-ae/issues/23
CA Certs request does not seem to fit BRSKI or PRM
I think that the figure 3 time sequence diagram is inconsisten with BRSKI's
choice of which operation to do when (but that might be okay), but it is also
may be inconsistent with PRM's needs.
I just answered there.
In a nutshell: I do not see a problem here in comparison with BRSKI, while I do
not know for BRSKI-PRM.
As I wrote in issue #22, about the nice SVG that is impossible to include,
we need to figure out what are the essential pieces, and then maybe make two
or three smaller diagrams that would work.
Yeah, let's see what we can do there.
I spent quite some time on getting along with the poor SVG support, with not
much success.
Talk to you in a couple of minutes in the design team meeting,
David
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
