Re: Site is down or removed
On 19 Nov 2013, at 08:19, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote: DNS is fine, I just need somewhere to point it. Gav, the sites should all point to eos/aurora - www.apachecon.com does already for example. Cheers, Tony -- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com pct...@apache.org http://www.pc-tony.com GPG - 1024D/51047D66 --
RE: Site is down or removed
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Gavin McDonald wrote: apachecon.eu was auto renewed yesterday. DNS is still broken though, still failing in the same way as described in INFRA-6973 Nick
RE: Site is down or removed
-Original Message- From: Nick Burch [mailto:n...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, 18 November 2013 9:36 PM To: Gavin McDonald Cc: infrastructure-priv...@apache.org; apachecon-discuss@apache.org Subject: RE: Site is down or removed On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Gavin McDonald wrote: apachecon.eu was auto renewed yesterday. DNS is still broken though, still failing in the same way as described in INFRA-6973 Yeah I haven't looked at that , I notice no configuration is our httpd configs either. What would you like it to point to , the same as na13.apachecon.com or somewhere else? Gav... Nick
RE: Site is down or removed
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Gavin McDonald wrote: DNS is still broken though, still failing in the same way as described in INFRA-6973 Yeah I haven't looked at that , I notice no configuration is our httpd configs either. I'd suggest we fix the DNS issue first, then worry about the hosting second. We have a zone file defined for it, but it isn't being used What would you like it to point to , the same as na13.apachecon.com or somewhere else? The question is more where Rich would like it pointing to, it's his baby now ;-) My hunch is that Rich will want to request a new svnpubsub site, along the lines of the na11 one, serving the static copy of the site. Probably to be called eu12.apachecon.com + 12.apachecon.eu long term, with www.apachecon.eu going to the holding page explaining about ApacheCon news coming soon! However, not much point asking for that yet, when DNS is stuffed, as you won't be able to test it! Nick
RE: Site is down or removed
apachecon.eu was auto renewed yesterday. Gav... -Original Message- From: Tony Stevenson [mailto:t...@pc-tony.com] Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2013 6:42 PM To: Andrea Pescetti Cc: apachecon-discuss@apache.org; Rich Bowen; Melissa Warnkin; Apache Infrastructure - Private; Nick Burch; Melissa Warnkin Subject: Re: Site is down or removed Ok, So now that I sent this message, I have stumbled across a message from our domain registrar. ### Dear Host, We will be initiating the renewal for your apachecon.eu domain on 11/15/2013. Please be sure to check the status of the domain renewal by visiting Domain Central after 11/30/2013: http://members.dotster.com/controlpanel/domaincentral/index.bml (Remember, it can take up to 72 hours for a renewal to be processed.) The renewal will be charged to the credit card we have on file for your account and will be processed when the renewal is initiated. (If you have a domain credit available in your account, we will use that to renew your domain, and you will not be charged for the renewal.) If you would prefer to handle the renewal yourself or renew for a period longer than a year, please ... - Go to Domain Central: http://members.dotster.com/controlpanel/domaincentral/index.bml - Click on the link for your apachecon.eu domain name - Click on the button to renew your domain - Follow the instructions for purchasing a domain credit and completing your renewal. Pricing information for domains purchased through Dotster is available in DomainCentral: http://www.dotster.com/controlpanel/domaincentral/beta/index.bml Important: To process the renewal yourself, you must initiate the renewal process or opt out of the Automated Domain Renewal system through Domain Central before 11/15/2013. You can access Domain Central by visiting: http://www.dotster.com/controlpanel/domaincentral/beta/index.bml If you have questions about your domain or the renewal process, please submit a request directly to our ticketing system via your Support Console: http://www.dotster.com/controlpanel/sconsole Wishing you continued success, The Dotster Team # On 13 Nov 2013, at 07:39, Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com wrote: On 12 Nov 2013, at 23:38, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Tony Stevenson wrote: I hazard a guess that apachecon.eu has since expired, it seems to be in the locked state awaiting expiry. Do we really want to renew this if it has indeed expired? Or rather re-register it? Can we possibly agree on one standard? Not that I really like mixing public lists, private lists, personal communication and a JIRA issue sitting untouched at https://issues.apache.org/jira//browse/INFRA-6973 ... but the .eu registry at http://www.eurid.eu/ says it is registered in the name of Mark (even though it may be in quarantine; often on eurid.eu I see that domains are considered registered until the last day of the month in which they expire). Anyway, agreeing on one standard is good. But letting domains expire as a policy is very bad, First, this is not policy and is not normal. Please don't assume that it is. If it has expired *and* we (infra) managed the domain then it has somehow slipped under our radar. I suspect auto-renew might not have been enabled. since we have plenty of links to apachecon.eu from, Why do we? We should be linking to apachecon.com which is the canonical namespace. At best apachecon.eu should be redirecting to .com - at worst we should just be holding the domain to protect the namespace. for example, blog posts. And this would result in our official blog What official blog is this? URL, please? linking to a spam/whatever site if the domain is let expire. So I would prefer that the domain is renewed or redeemed, set to auto-renew and then redirected to whatever convention we agree upon. eurid.eu is currently broken, in that their whois service is down. If the domain has expired, we will now have to wait until it is released into the public domain for purchase again. I am not sure off hand what the timescales for these are, if it is anything like .uk registrar it is in suspension for 30 days, then locked for 30 more before being released for general sale again. Regards, Andrea. Cheers, Tony -- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com pct...@apache.org http://www.pc-tony.com GPG - 1024D/51047D66 -- Cheers, Tony -- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com pct...@apache.org http://www.pc-tony.com GPG - 1024D/51047D66 --
Re: Site is down or removed
Hello infra, Following up on this, as I haven't seen a request for your help yet. Please see below. Particularly: I'm not sure who ended up with that part of the concom responsibility when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static archive at some suitable hostnames Nick Perhaps it just expired. The whois record is unhelpful. can someone follow up with folks from Infra to see what's up? Thank you so much!! Have a great day!! ~M From: Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:32 PM Subject: Re: Site is down or removed On 11/05/2013 08:56 PM, Nick Burch wrote: On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Rich Bowen wrote: We do not, to my knowledge, still own that domain. You sure? We certainly used to, at least as late as May. When did someone transfer it away, and to who? A static version of the ApacheCon Europe 2012 site was captured into SVN after the event: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/apachecon/eu12.apachecon.com I'm not sure who ended up with that part of the concom responsibility when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static archive at some suitable hostnames Nick Perhaps it just expired. The whois record is unhelpful. can someone follow up with folks from Infra to see what's up?
Re: Site is down or removed
Hey Tony, Thank you for your email. I'll have to defer to Rich and Nick to answer your questions. Rich/Nick: Please see Tony's questions below and let him know. Thank you all for your help!! ~M From: Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com To: Apache Infrastructure - Private infrastructure-priv...@apache.org; Melissa Warnkin missywarn...@yahoo.com Cc: apachecon-discuss@apache.org apachecon-discuss@apache.org Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 3:01 PM Subject: Re: Site is down or removed At what URL exactly would folks like the site published? The whois record for what zone is particularly unhelpful? On 12 Nov 2013, at 18:06, Melissa Warnkin missywarn...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello infra, Following up on this, as I haven't seen a request for your help yet. Please see below. Particularly: I'm not sure who ended up with that part of the concom responsibility when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static archive at some suitable hostnames Nick Perhaps it just expired. The whois record is unhelpful. can someone follow up with folks from Infra to see what's up? Thank you so much!! Have a great day!! ~M From: Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:32 PM Subject: Re: Site is down or removed On 11/05/2013 08:56 PM, Nick Burch wrote: On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Rich Bowen wrote: We do not, to my knowledge, still own that domain. You sure? We certainly used to, at least as late as May. When did someone transfer it away, and to who? A static version of the ApacheCon Europe 2012 site was captured into SVN after the event: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/apachecon/eu12.apachecon.com I'm not sure who ended up with that part of the concom responsibility when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static archive at some suitable hostnames Nick Perhaps it just expired. The whois record is unhelpful. can someone follow up with folks from Infra to see what's up? Cheers, Tony -- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com pct...@apache.org http://www.pc-tony.com GPG - 1024D/51047D66 --
Re: Site is down or removed
Mostly I was just commenting that `whois apachecon.eu` doesn't actually have any info in it, and that `dig apachecon.eu` doesn't return a record. I expect that what we want is to have apachecon.eu redirect to http://apachecon.com/c/ and have the 2012 archive put there. Looks like we've got a variety of different naming conventions for the various past events listed there, including na11.apachecon.com and apachecon.com/YEAR/VENUE and apachecon.com/euYEAR :( On 11/12/2013 03:23 PM, Melissa Warnkin wrote: Hey Tony, Thank you for your email. I'll have to defer to Rich and Nick to answer your questions. Rich/Nick: Please see Tony's questions below and let him know. Thank you all for your help!! ~M *From:* Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com *To:* Apache Infrastructure - Private infrastructure-priv...@apache.org; Melissa Warnkin missywarn...@yahoo.com *Cc:* apachecon-discuss@apache.org apachecon-discuss@apache.org *Sent:* Tuesday, November 12, 2013 3:01 PM *Subject:* Re: Site is down or removed At what URL exactly would folks like the site published? The whois record for what zone is particularly unhelpful? On 12 Nov 2013, at 18:06, Melissa Warnkin missywarn...@yahoo.com mailto:missywarn...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello infra, Following up on this, as I haven't seen a request for your help yet. Please see below. Particularly: I'm not sure who ended up with that part of the concom responsibility when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static archive at some suitable hostnames Nick Perhaps it just expired. The whois record is unhelpful. can someone follow up with folks from Infra to see what's up? Thank you so much!! Have a great day!! ~M From: Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org mailto:apachecon-discuss@apache.org Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:32 PM Subject: Re: Site is down or removed On 11/05/2013 08:56 PM, Nick Burch wrote: On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Rich Bowen wrote: We do not, to my knowledge, still own that domain. You sure? We certainly used to, at least as late as May. When did someone transfer it away, and to who? A static version of the ApacheCon Europe 2012 site was captured into SVN after the event: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/apachecon/eu12.apachecon.com I'm not sure who ended up with that part of the concom responsibility when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static archive at some suitable hostnames Nick Perhaps it just expired. The whois record is unhelpful. can someone follow up with folks from Infra to see what's up? Cheers, Tony -- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com mailto:t...@pc-tony.com pct...@apache.org mailto:pct...@apache.org http://www.pc-tony.com http://www.pc-tony.com/ GPG - 1024D/51047D66 -- -- Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com http://rcbowen.com/
Re: Site is down or removed
On 11/12/2013 03:49 PM, Tony Stevenson wrote: I hazard a guess that apachecon.eu has since expired, it seems to be in the locked state awaiting expiry. Do we really want to renew this if it has indeed expired? Or rather re-register it? I really don't have an opinion on this. I seem to remember that someone outside of the foundation registered it, and then signed it over to us (SS possibly?), but I could be making that up. Can we possibly agree on one standard? Is the site code sufficiently generic that we can make the site na11.apacheonc.com, work at www.apachecon.com/2011/na or something? So we support only one convention. Yes please. I'd prefer /year/VENUE personally, although http://apachecon.com/2006/Asia/ is the one weird one that we could probably leave as is. Looks like we did in fact use that convention for the longest time. Looks like it's NA rather than na, although we called it US rather than NA up through 2010 --Rich On 12 Nov 2013, at 20:42, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: Mostly I was just commenting that `whois apachecon.eu` doesn't actually have any info in it, and that `dig apachecon.eu` doesn't return a record. I expect that what we want is to have apachecon.eu redirect to http://apachecon.com/c/ and have the 2012 archive put there. Looks like we've got a variety of different naming conventions for the various past events listed there, including na11.apachecon.com and apachecon.com/YEAR/VENUE and apachecon.com/euYEAR :( On 11/12/2013 03:23 PM, Melissa Warnkin wrote: Hey Tony, Thank you for your email. I'll have to defer to Rich and Nick to answer your questions. Rich/Nick: Please see Tony's questions below and let him know. Thank you all for your help!! ~M From: Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com To: Apache Infrastructure - Private infrastructure-priv...@apache.org; Melissa Warnkin missywarn...@yahoo.com Cc: apachecon-discuss@apache.org apachecon-discuss@apache.org Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 3:01 PM Subject: Re: Site is down or removed At what URL exactly would folks like the site published? The whois record for what zone is particularly unhelpful? On 12 Nov 2013, at 18:06, Melissa Warnkin missywarn...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello infra, Following up on this, as I haven't seen a request for your help yet. Please see below. Particularly: I'm not sure who ended up with that part of the concom responsibility when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static archive at some suitable hostnames Nick Perhaps it just expired. The whois record is unhelpful. can someone follow up with folks from Infra to see what's up? Thank you so much!! Have a great day!! ~M From: Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:32 PM Subject: Re: Site is down or removed On 11/05/2013 08:56 PM, Nick Burch wrote: On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Rich Bowen wrote: We do not, to my knowledge, still own that domain. You sure? We certainly used to, at least as late as May. When did someone transfer it away, and to who? A static version of the ApacheCon Europe 2012 site was captured into SVN after the event: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/apachecon/eu12.apachecon.com I'm not sure who ended up with that part of the concom responsibility when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static archive at some suitable hostnames Nick Perhaps it just expired. The whois record is unhelpful. can someone follow up with folks from Infra to see what's up? Cheers, Tony -- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com pct...@apache.org http://www.pc-tony.com GPG - 1024D/51047D66 -- -- Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com http://rcbowen.com/ Cheers, Tony -- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com pct...@apache.org http://www.pc-tony.com GPG - 1024D/51047D66 -- -- Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com http://rcbowen.com/
Re: Site is down or removed
At what URL exactly would folks like the site published? The whois record for what zone is particularly unhelpful? On 12 Nov 2013, at 18:06, Melissa Warnkin missywarn...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello infra, Following up on this, as I haven't seen a request for your help yet. Please see below. Particularly: I'm not sure who ended up with that part of the concom responsibility when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static archive at some suitable hostnames Nick Perhaps it just expired. The whois record is unhelpful. can someone follow up with folks from Infra to see what's up? Thank you so much!! Have a great day!! ~M From: Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 9:32 PM Subject: Re: Site is down or removed On 11/05/2013 08:56 PM, Nick Burch wrote: On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Rich Bowen wrote: We do not, to my knowledge, still own that domain. You sure? We certainly used to, at least as late as May. When did someone transfer it away, and to who? A static version of the ApacheCon Europe 2012 site was captured into SVN after the event: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/apachecon/eu12.apachecon.com I'm not sure who ended up with that part of the concom responsibility when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static archive at some suitable hostnames Nick Perhaps it just expired. The whois record is unhelpful. can someone follow up with folks from Infra to see what's up? Cheers, Tony -- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com pct...@apache.org http://www.pc-tony.com GPG - 1024D/51047D66 --
Re: Site is down or removed
Tony Stevenson wrote: I hazard a guess that apachecon.eu has since expired, it seems to be in the locked state awaiting expiry. Do we really want to renew this if it has indeed expired? Or rather re-register it? Can we possibly agree on one standard? Not that I really like mixing public lists, private lists, personal communication and a JIRA issue sitting untouched at https://issues.apache.org/jira//browse/INFRA-6973 ... but the .eu registry at http://www.eurid.eu/ says it is registered in the name of Mark (even though it may be in quarantine; often on eurid.eu I see that domains are considered registered until the last day of the month in which they expire). Anyway, agreeing on one standard is good. But letting domains expire as a policy is very bad, since we have plenty of links to apachecon.eu from, for example, blog posts. And this would result in our official blog linking to a spam/whatever site if the domain is let expire. So I would prefer that the domain is renewed or redeemed, set to auto-renew and then redirected to whatever convention we agree upon. Regards, Andrea.
Re: Site is down or removed
On 12 Nov 2013, at 23:38, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Tony Stevenson wrote: I hazard a guess that apachecon.eu has since expired, it seems to be in the locked state awaiting expiry. Do we really want to renew this if it has indeed expired? Or rather re-register it? Can we possibly agree on one standard? Not that I really like mixing public lists, private lists, personal communication and a JIRA issue sitting untouched at https://issues.apache.org/jira//browse/INFRA-6973 ... but the .eu registry at http://www.eurid.eu/ says it is registered in the name of Mark (even though it may be in quarantine; often on eurid.eu I see that domains are considered registered until the last day of the month in which they expire). Anyway, agreeing on one standard is good. But letting domains expire as a policy is very bad, First, this is not policy and is not normal. Please don’t assume that it is. If it has expired *and* we (infra) managed the domain then it has somehow slipped under our radar. I suspect auto-renew might not have been enabled. since we have plenty of links to apachecon.eu from, Why do we? We should be linking to apachecon.com which is the canonical namespace. At best apachecon.eu should be redirecting to .com - at worst we should just be holding the domain to protect the namespace. for example, blog posts. And this would result in our official blog What official blog is this? URL, please? linking to a spam/whatever site if the domain is let expire. So I would prefer that the domain is renewed or redeemed, set to auto-renew and then redirected to whatever convention we agree upon. eurid.eu is currently broken, in that their whois service is down. If the domain has expired, we will now have to wait until it is released into the public domain for purchase again. I am not sure off hand what the timescales for these are, if it is anything like .uk registrar it is in suspension for 30 days, then locked for 30 more before being released for general sale again. Regards, Andrea. Cheers, Tony -- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com pct...@apache.org http://www.pc-tony.com GPG - 1024D/51047D66 --
Re: Site is down or removed
Ok, So now that I sent this message, I have stumbled across a message from our domain registrar. ### Dear Host, We will be initiating the renewal for your apachecon.eu domain on 11/15/2013. Please be sure to check the status of the domain renewal by visiting Domain Central after 11/30/2013: http://members.dotster.com/controlpanel/domaincentral/index.bml (Remember, it can take up to 72 hours for a renewal to be processed.) The renewal will be charged to the credit card we have on file for your account and will be processed when the renewal is initiated. (If you have a domain credit available in your account, we will use that to renew your domain, and you will not be charged for the renewal.) If you would prefer to handle the renewal yourself or renew for a period longer than a year, please ... - Go to Domain Central: http://members.dotster.com/controlpanel/domaincentral/index.bml - Click on the link for your apachecon.eu domain name - Click on the button to renew your domain - Follow the instructions for purchasing a domain credit and completing your renewal. Pricing information for domains purchased through Dotster is available in DomainCentral: http://www.dotster.com/controlpanel/domaincentral/beta/index.bml Important: To process the renewal yourself, you must initiate the renewal process or opt out of the Automated Domain Renewal system through Domain Central before 11/15/2013. You can access Domain Central by visiting: http://www.dotster.com/controlpanel/domaincentral/beta/index.bml If you have questions about your domain or the renewal process, please submit a request directly to our ticketing system via your Support Console: http://www.dotster.com/controlpanel/sconsole Wishing you continued success, The Dotster Team # On 13 Nov 2013, at 07:39, Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com wrote: On 12 Nov 2013, at 23:38, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Tony Stevenson wrote: I hazard a guess that apachecon.eu has since expired, it seems to be in the locked state awaiting expiry. Do we really want to renew this if it has indeed expired? Or rather re-register it? Can we possibly agree on one standard? Not that I really like mixing public lists, private lists, personal communication and a JIRA issue sitting untouched at https://issues.apache.org/jira//browse/INFRA-6973 ... but the .eu registry at http://www.eurid.eu/ says it is registered in the name of Mark (even though it may be in quarantine; often on eurid.eu I see that domains are considered registered until the last day of the month in which they expire). Anyway, agreeing on one standard is good. But letting domains expire as a policy is very bad, First, this is not policy and is not normal. Please don’t assume that it is. If it has expired *and* we (infra) managed the domain then it has somehow slipped under our radar. I suspect auto-renew might not have been enabled. since we have plenty of links to apachecon.eu from, Why do we? We should be linking to apachecon.com which is the canonical namespace. At best apachecon.eu should be redirecting to .com - at worst we should just be holding the domain to protect the namespace. for example, blog posts. And this would result in our official blog What official blog is this? URL, please? linking to a spam/whatever site if the domain is let expire. So I would prefer that the domain is renewed or redeemed, set to auto-renew and then redirected to whatever convention we agree upon. eurid.eu is currently broken, in that their whois service is down. If the domain has expired, we will now have to wait until it is released into the public domain for purchase again. I am not sure off hand what the timescales for these are, if it is anything like .uk registrar it is in suspension for 30 days, then locked for 30 more before being released for general sale again. Regards, Andrea. Cheers, Tony -- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com pct...@apache.org http://www.pc-tony.com GPG - 1024D/51047D66 -- Cheers, Tony -- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com pct...@apache.org http://www.pc-tony.com GPG - 1024D/51047D66 --
Re: Site is down or removed
On 06/11/13 02:32, Rich Bowen wrote: Perhaps it just expired. The whois record is unhelpful. can someone follow up with folks from Infra to see what's up? The domain hasn't expired, but something is clearly broken I've raised INFRA-6973 to get someone to take a look at it When it's back, someone should probably look at switching the site from pointing at the Eldarion site to the static copy in svn. The hosting with Eldarion has probably long since expired, and they may turn it off at some point soon. It'll need something similar to what we have for archive.apachecon.com Nick
Re: Site is down or removed
We do not, to my knowledge, still own that domain. -- Rich Bowen, mobile edition rbo...@rcbowen.com On Nov 4, 2013 8:09 PM, Charles Moulliard ch0...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The ApacheCon web site is not longer available : http://www.apachecon.eu/ Is it down or removed ? Regards, -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.github.io
Re: Site is down or removed
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Rich Bowen wrote: We do not, to my knowledge, still own that domain. You sure? We certainly used to, at least as late as May. When did someone transfer it away, and to who? A static version of the ApacheCon Europe 2012 site was captured into SVN after the event: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/apachecon/eu12.apachecon.com I'm not sure who ended up with that part of the concom responsibility when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static archive at some suitable hostnames Nick
Re: Site is down or removed
Been able to retrieve presentations here : http://archive.apachecon.com/eu2012/presentations/ BTW, this is stupid that we don't use anymore apachecon.eu as lot of apache speakers have created references to this web site for their talks in their blogs ... On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Nick Burch n...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Rich Bowen wrote: We do not, to my knowledge, still own that domain. You sure? We certainly used to, at least as late as May. When did someone transfer it away, and to who? A static version of the ApacheCon Europe 2012 site was captured into SVN after the event: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/apachecon/eu12.apachecon.com I'm not sure who ended up with that part of the concom responsibility when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static archive at some suitable hostnames Nick -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.github.io
Re: Site is down or removed
On 11/05/2013 08:56 PM, Nick Burch wrote: On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Rich Bowen wrote: We do not, to my knowledge, still own that domain. You sure? We certainly used to, at least as late as May. When did someone transfer it away, and to who? A static version of the ApacheCon Europe 2012 site was captured into SVN after the event: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/apachecon/eu12.apachecon.com I'm not sure who ended up with that part of the concom responsibility when the board killed the committee, but whover that is may wish to ask infra nicely to put up a svn pubsub site based on that static archive at some suitable hostnames Nick Perhaps it just expired. The whois record is unhelpful. can someone follow up with folks from Infra to see what's up?
Site is down or removed
Hi, The ApacheCon web site is not longer available : http://www.apachecon.eu/ Is it down or removed ? Regards, -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.github.io
Re: Site is down or removed
Hi Charles, To the best of my knowledge, the website was taken down (removed). ~Melissa From: Charles Moulliard ch0...@gmail.com To: apachecon-discuss@apache.org Sent: Monday, November 4, 2013 7:07 AM Subject: Site is down or removed Hi, The ApacheCon web site is not longer available : http://www.apachecon.eu/ Is it down or removed ? Regards, -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.github.io
