[Aptitude-devel] Bug#519308: marked as done (aptitude: segfaults after CTRL-z and fg)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:20:54 + with message-id CAPQ4b8=Wyn=y0yt3vlyq+lmkqaqwgeezppkbvcauf-uw03o...@mail.gmail.com and subject line aptitude: segfaults after CTRL-z and fg has caused the Debian Bug report #519308, regarding aptitude: segfaults after CTRL-z and fg to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 519308: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519308 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: aptitude Version: 0.4.11.11-1 Severity: normal I accidently put aptitude into the background by pressing CTRL-z. When using fg to get it back it segfaults. gdb gives: #0 0xb7f3f424 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb78c7956 in kill () from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #2 0xb788ee41 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgpm.so.2 #3 0x127d in ?? () #4 0x0014 in ?? () #5 0x in ?? () -- Package-specific info: aptitude 0.4.11.11 compiled at Nov 20 2008 04:02:44 Compiler: g++ 4.3.2 Compiled against: apt version 4.6.0 NCurses version 5.6 libsigc++ version: 2.0.18 Ept support enabled. Current library versions: NCurses version: ncurses 5.7.20090228 cwidget version: 0.5.12 Apt version: 4.6.0 linux-gate.so.1 = (0xb7fc5000) libapt-pkg-libc6.7-6.so.4.6 = /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.7-6.so.4.6 (0xb7ef8000) libncursesw.so.5 = /lib/libncursesw.so.5 (0xb7eba000) libsigc-2.0.so.0 = /usr/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0 (0xb7eb4000) libcwidget.so.3 = /usr/lib/libcwidget.so.3 (0xb7df) libept.so.0 = /usr/lib/libept.so.0 (0xb7d2c000) libxapian.so.15 = /usr/lib/libxapian.so.15 (0xb7bd3000) libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7bbe000) libpthread.so.0 = /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7ba5000) libstdc++.so.6 = /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb7ab7000) libm.so.6 = /lib/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0xb7a91000) libgcc_s.so.1 = /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb7a84000) libc.so.6 = /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb7922000) libutil.so.1 = /lib/i686/cmov/libutil.so.1 (0xb791e000) libdl.so.2 = /lib/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0xb791a000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fc6000) Terminal: linux $DISPLAY not set. `which aptitude`: /usr/bin/aptitude aptitude version information: aptitude linkage: -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages aptitude depends on: ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6. 0.7.20.2 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii libc6 2.9-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcwidget30.5.12-4 high-level terminal interface libr ii libept00.5.26High-level library for managing De ii libgcc11:4.3.3-5 GCC support library ii libncursesw5 5.7+20090228-1shared libraries for terminal hand ii libsigc++-2.0-0c2a 2.0.18-2 type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libstdc++6 4.3.3-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxapian151.0.10-2 Search engine library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-13 compression library - runtime Versions of packages aptitude recommends: pn aptitude-doc-en | aptitude-do none (no description available) ii libparse-debianchangelog-perl 1.1.1-2parse Debian changelogs and output Versions of packages aptitude suggests: pn debtags none (no description available) pn tasksel none (no description available) -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- tags 519308 + unreproducible stop Hi, I tried to reproduce it but it's not happening with 0.6.8.3-1 with amd64. I guess that it was a problem which was fixed in the meantime, possibly with libraries (like libgpm, one of the last calls in the stack trace). So I think that it's better to close this now, please reopen if you can reproduce it again. Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com---End Message--- ___ Aptitude-devel mailing list Aptitude-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
[Aptitude-devel] Processed: aptitude: segfaults after CTRL-z and fg
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 519308 + unreproducible Bug #519308 [aptitude] aptitude: segfaults after CTRL-z and fg Added tag(s) unreproducible. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 519308: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519308 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ Aptitude-devel mailing list Aptitude-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
[Aptitude-devel] Bug#716669: [aptitude] Wrong help for some aptitude options (es_ES locale)
On Thursday, Jan 23 2014 at 01:03 (UTC+1), Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Thanks for the report. We will need more info to fix this, or perhaps a full revision by Debian translators. The .po files can be downloaded here, if somebody wants to fix them and attach the resulting .po to this bug report. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=aptitude/aptitude.git;a=tree;f=po;h=5ecd6aa7ba4f80e70beaac8722d4c415ab9d0af0;hb=HEAD Cheers. Please, follow these steps to find the bug: Choose the es.po file ( http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=aptitude/aptitude.git;a=blob;f=po/es.po;h=0de0b6f42e845203615ae781b6d74b16f50f0483;hb=HEAD ) and take a look at the lines 5606-5607 and 5611-5612. That's all. Best regards, -- Manolo Díaz ___ Aptitude-devel mailing list Aptitude-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
[Aptitude-devel] Processed: aptitude: Terrible Interactive Search Performance
Processing control commands: severity -1 wishlist Bug #573626 [aptitude] Terrible Interactive Search Performance Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 573626: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573626 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ Aptitude-devel mailing list Aptitude-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
[Aptitude-devel] Bug#267162: marked as done (aptitude: not installed not noted upon purge)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:32:30 + with message-id CAPQ4b8=p1cxo-vbk-fbc8prkrwg28zdtpycck6sn4skdxa3...@mail.gmail.com and subject line aptitude: not installed not noted upon purge has caused the Debian Bug report #267162, regarding aptitude: not installed not noted upon purge to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 267162: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=267162 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: aptitude Version: 0.2.15.2-1 Severity: minor # aptitude remove libgd2-xpm ... Package libgd2-xpm is not installed, so it will not be removed OK, but gets lost in all the miles and miles of The following packages have been kept back: abs-guide adduser alsa-utils anacron apt apt-doc apt-utils aptitude... However, # aptitude purge libgd2-xpm ... The following packages have been kept back: You forgot the ... is not installed line! ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi, This bug report was submitted many years ago and never handled. This does not seem to happen now as described in the bug report (at least in my system, with pretty much the stock configuration). It does not say explicitly that the package is not installed, but it's very clear that nothing was removed (so at least for me it is a clear clue that the package was in fact not installed), because there are no long messages occluding that in fact nothing was removed. apt-get mentions it explicitly, but also have more information printed and the first lines don't indicate nothing was changed. So I think that it's better to close this bug report, and if anything, open a new one with the desired behaviour based on the current output. # aptitude remove love No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed. 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 18 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used. # aptitude purge love No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed. 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 18 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used. With apt-get: # apt-get remove love Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package 'love' is not installed, so not removed 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 18 not upgraded. # apt-get purge love Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package 'love' is not installed, so not removed 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 18 not upgraded. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com---End Message--- ___ Aptitude-devel mailing list Aptitude-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
[Aptitude-devel] Bug#573626: Bug#573626: aptitude: Terrible Interactive Search Performance
Hi, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: I never noticed this as a problem in desktops or servers, even on old pieces of hardware, I agree. but it might happen that with some architectures they struggle. Even on my slowest boxes (Alix, Sparcs, PowerMac G4, cheap VMs, ARM netbook, DEC Alpha, 1st generation EeePC, etc.) I've never felt this being an issue. Startup performance is way more annoying than this, at least for me. :-) But then again, I'm also always using two non-default settings which may speed up usage, too: * I disabled Aptitude::UI::Incremental-Search as I don't want arbitrary branches to be opened during searching. * I enabled Aptitude::UI::Minibuf-Prompts as I can close that prompt with Ctrl-G as in Emacs. :-) I've just did a short test on my PowerMac G4 and I had the feeling that searching without these two options is slightly slower. So these two settings may help people who consider the interactive search to be too slugish. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert a...@debian.org, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `-| 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 ___ Aptitude-devel mailing list Aptitude-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
[Aptitude-devel] Processed: Re: Bug#716669: [aptitude] Wrong help for some aptitude options (es_ES locale)
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #716669 [aptitude] [aptitude] Wrong help for some aptitude options (es_ES locale) Added tag(s) pending. -- 716669: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=716669 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ Aptitude-devel mailing list Aptitude-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
[Aptitude-devel] Processed: aptitude: add Reinstall (shortcut L) to the package menu
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #633788 [aptitude] aptitude: add Reinstall (shortcut L) to the package menu Added tag(s) pending. -- 633788: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633788 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ Aptitude-devel mailing list Aptitude-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
[Aptitude-devel] Processed: aptitude: confuses purge with install in error message
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #348758 [aptitude] aptitude: confuses purge with install in error message Added tag(s) pending. -- 348758: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348758 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ Aptitude-devel mailing list Aptitude-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
[Aptitude-devel] Bug#348758: aptitude: confuses purge with install in error message
Control: tags -1 + pending Commited to VCS: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=aptitude/aptitude.git;a=commitdiff;h=4ac34e9d8af9140018e2cfeb945c788af9fe8b65 -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com ___ Aptitude-devel mailing list Aptitude-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
[Aptitude-devel] Bug#573626: Bug#573626: Bug#573626: Bug#573626: aptitude: Terrible Interactive Search Performance
On 24 January 2014 05:11, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote: That's why I am not sure if it's better to leave this open or close it. Realistically, I don't think that this is going to be fixed, Not immediately, but that is no reason to close it off. There is real work that can be done here, especially after work on startup times. and in any case not because of the existence of this problem, so leaving it open will not increase the chances of it being fixed. Leaving the report open does bring it to the attention of people looking to work on real issues. This task is perhaps interesting to someone looking to do non-trivial work. Also it was ignored for the best part of 4 years with no me toos. me toos is not really the character of bugs.d.o. Lack of these does not indicate disinterest. I only see it useful as a reminder, or to leave hints like what you gave above. Yes. For these and similar reasons many bugs are left open. Closing the reports does not make the issues go away. Regards ___ Aptitude-devel mailing list Aptitude-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
[Aptitude-devel] Bug#267162: closed by Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com (aptitude: not installed not noted upon purge)
OK ___ Aptitude-devel mailing list Aptitude-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
[Aptitude-devel] Bug#267162: Bug#267162: marked as done (aptitude: not installed not noted upon purge)
-- Forwarded message -- From: Dan Jacobson jida...@jidanni.org To: Debian Bug Tracking System sub...@bugs.debian.org Cc: Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 03:01:49 +0800 Subject: aptitude: not installed not noted upon purge # aptitude purge libgd2-xpm ... The following packages have been kept back: You forgot the ... is not installed line! -- Forwarded message -- From: Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com This bug report was submitted many years ago and never handled. This does not seem to happen now as described in the bug report (at least in my system, with pretty much the stock configuration). In the time between the bug report and your testing, it was decided that such output is only when --verbose is used. The inconsistency is still there, as confirmed by examination of the code and performing the commands with verbose enabled. This issue and other inconsistencies in the command line interface will be addressed by an extensive work I have in progress to restructure that module, using new tools exported by apt. The foundations of this work was in the 0.6.9 release, but that has been reworked and will be applied once the final changes are complete. Regards ___ Aptitude-devel mailing list Aptitude-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
[Aptitude-devel] Bug#496724: aptitude-doc-en: html output fails validation
retitle -1 aptitude-doc-en: html output fails validation (html 4 strict) done On 22 January 2014 05:33, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I cannot reproduce this bug now: $ validate --verbose /usr/share/doc/aptitude/html/en/index.html Checking /usr/share/doc/aptitude/html/en/index.html with HTML 4.01 Transitional document type... No errors! It seems to have been fixed in this commit, present in 0.6.8: commit 59d734c9028463c8b436851960195f8c69ef0693 Author: Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com Date: Fri May 11 16:54:56 2012 +0800 Add doctype headers to html docs. The alt part is not fixed yet, it seems. Correct, the alt tags are required by html 4 strict and html 5, and are important for accessibility with text-only browsers, screen readers, etc. Regards ___ Aptitude-devel mailing list Aptitude-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
