Re: [arch-general] GNU Privacy Assistant window sizing problem?

[Francis Gerund via arch-general]

Thanks Christoph.

Holding down the Meta/Super/Windows/Apple key does allow the "unmovable"
window to move.  Until Gnome "fixes" that capability, by removing it.
Using this workaround, I can now use the backend preferences window.

I am surprised that I didn't find a bug report on this already.  I guess I
can make one, as soon as I learn how to do that.



I

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Christoph Gysin 
wrote:

> This seems to be a bug in GPA. Nevertheless, you should be able to
> move/resize the window to see the hidden options and buttons. I don't
> use gnome, but I believe the default shortcuts are holding down the
> Meta/Super/Windows/Apple key, then click and drag with
> left/right/middle? mouse button to resize/move the window.
>
> Chris
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Francis Gerund via arch-general
>  wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Running Arch x86-64, Gnome 3, Linux 4.7.4-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Sep
> 15
> > 15:24:29 CEST 2016 x86_64 GNU/Linux.  Screeen is 15" 1366 x 768, 60 Hz.
> >
> > In GNU Privacy Assistant, when I open the "backend preferences" window,
> it
> > opens with the "basic" options selected, correctly sized.  But when I
> then
> > select either the "advanced" or "options", the window expands well below
> > the lower screen edge.  Some of the options are then hidden, and I can
> not
> > seem to find a way to resize the "backend preferences" window.
> >
> > Since the bottom row of buttons is completely hidden, I can not even
> change
> > the setting that are visible, except the "basic" options.  I have
> searched
> > the forum, wiki, and online, without success.
> >
> > Has anyone else seen this problem, and if so, found a solution?
>
>
>
> --
> echo mailto: NOSPAM !#$.'<*>'|sed 's. ..'|tr "<*> !#:2" org@fr33z3
>

Re: [arch-general] GNU Privacy Assistant window sizing problem?

[Christoph Gysin via arch-general]

This seems to be a bug in GPA. Nevertheless, you should be able to
move/resize the window to see the hidden options and buttons. I don't
use gnome, but I believe the default shortcuts are holding down the
Meta/Super/Windows/Apple key, then click and drag with
left/right/middle? mouse button to resize/move the window.

Chris

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Francis Gerund via arch-general
 wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Running Arch x86-64, Gnome 3, Linux 4.7.4-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Sep 15
> 15:24:29 CEST 2016 x86_64 GNU/Linux.  Screeen is 15" 1366 x 768, 60 Hz.
>
> In GNU Privacy Assistant, when I open the "backend preferences" window, it
> opens with the "basic" options selected, correctly sized.  But when I then
> select either the "advanced" or "options", the window expands well below
> the lower screen edge.  Some of the options are then hidden, and I can not
> seem to find a way to resize the "backend preferences" window.
>
> Since the bottom row of buttons is completely hidden, I can not even change
> the setting that are visible, except the "basic" options.  I have searched
> the forum, wiki, and online, without success.
>
> Has anyone else seen this problem, and if so, found a solution?



-- 
echo mailto: NOSPAM !#$.'<*>'|sed 's. ..'|tr "<*> !#:2" org@fr33z3

[arch-general] GNU Privacy Assistant window sizing problem?

[Francis Gerund via arch-general]

Hello.

Running Arch x86-64, Gnome 3, Linux 4.7.4-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Sep 15
15:24:29 CEST 2016 x86_64 GNU/Linux.  Screeen is 15" 1366 x 768, 60 Hz.

In GNU Privacy Assistant, when I open the "backend preferences" window, it
opens with the "basic" options selected, correctly sized.  But when I then
select either the "advanced" or "options", the window expands well below
the lower screen edge.  Some of the options are then hidden, and I can not
seem to find a way to resize the "backend preferences" window.

Since the bottom row of buttons is completely hidden, I can not even change
the setting that are visible, except the "basic" options.  I have searched
the forum, wiki, and online, without success.

Has anyone else seen this problem, and if so, found a solution?