Re: [Arm-netbook] pyra computer
On 2/16/18, Christopher Havelwrote: > Well, that didn't work out. Luke, can I please ask you to hold out till > Sunday? I have company tomorrow helping with that room and I'll be busy all > day with that. > > I'm truly sorry to have to ask... There's no rush.. Nothing said that a logo has to be decided immediately. Luke and Ron are at conflict, because of fundamental ideals regarding serendipitous organization. Ron is skeptical of what good authority and one individual leading a troupe will bring the world. Luke is impassioned to bring about destined change as quickly and forcefully as possible. Ron is by no means an artist capable of inspiring serendipitous organization (no offense but the title is difficult to live up to), making the fellow very much a cynic. Settling this one argument by desperately trying to live up to that title, isn't going to end their standing conflict. Only bringing a real artist who can rally real attention can undo that. I agree with you about the two-tier logo, but it would take something really inventive to communicate effectively the idea of a risky amateur project across language barriers. I said once and I'll say again, someone should invite Wenqing Yan to participate in the project. https://www.yuumeiart.com/contact/ http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/pipermail/arm-netbook/2017-January/012740.html ___ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk
Re: [Arm-netbook] pyra computer
Well, that didn't work out. Luke, can I please ask you to hold out till Sunday? I have company tomorrow helping with that room and I'll be busy all day with that. I'm truly sorry to have to ask... ___ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk
Re: [Arm-netbook] pyra computer
FYI -- mostly to Luke -- I've got a two-tier logo design drawn out on paper, just haven't had a chance to scan it yet. I have a doc appointment today -- gave myself a friggin limp trying to empty out that room that got leaked in -- when I get back from the docs cussing me out, I'll try and see if I can get my scanner to work. It's unfortunately in that problem room, but it itself escaped water damage. I just have to run a power cord real quick like. That should be about 4-4:30pm Eastern US time, with results hitting this list shortly thereafter... if I need more time, I'll let ya'll know. ___ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk
Re: [Arm-netbook] pyra computer
On Fri, 16 Feb 2018, Pen-Yuan Hsingwrote: > On 16/02/18 11:13, Erik Auerswald wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I did not want to enter this flame war, but I want to point out an >> obvious misunderstanding of the involved parties: >> >> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 02:51:06PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >>> [...] >>> now, it so happens in the case of HDMI that you can simply put an >>> HDMI connector on the product what you CANNOT AND MUST NOT DO is >>> put the *WORD* "HDMI" anywhere on your product, because that has >>> SPECIFIC implications that the seller of that product HAS GONE THROUGH >>> THE CERTIFICATION PROCESS. >> >> Without a "product" and a "seller" there can be no infringement. A hobby >> project can exist and be publicly discussed and documented without being >> either a product or sold. >> >> Over and out, >> Erik > > I didn't want to enter this either. But I'd like to clarify that if it's > copyright we're talking about, I strongly suspect that it is _not_ copyright that we're talking about. Until Luke or someone else points at an authoritative source to show otherwise, I would assume that he's just mixed up several of the barely related branches of law that people unhelpfully lump together under the "Intellectual Property" umbrella term. Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd. |-| http://www.hands.com/http://ftp.uk.debian.org/ |(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg,GERMANY ___ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk
Re: [Arm-netbook] pyra computer
On 16/02/18 11:13, Erik Auerswald wrote: Hi, I did not want to enter this flame war, but I want to point out an obvious misunderstanding of the involved parties: On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 02:51:06PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: [...] now, it so happens in the case of HDMI that you can simply put an HDMI connector on the product what you CANNOT AND MUST NOT DO is put the *WORD* "HDMI" anywhere on your product, because that has SPECIFIC implications that the seller of that product HAS GONE THROUGH THE CERTIFICATION PROCESS. Without a "product" and a "seller" there can be no infringement. A hobby project can exist and be publicly discussed and documented without being either a product or sold. Over and out, Erik I didn't want to enter this either. But I'd like to clarify that if it's copyright we're talking about, then having a "product" or "seller" doesn't matter. It's simply about the making of copies, and unlicensed copies are forbidden by default regardless of how the copies are used. I don't like it and disagree with it's whole premise (see onpon4's earlier comment) but that's how it works. ___ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk
Re: [Arm-netbook] pyra computer
Hi, I did not want to enter this flame war, but I want to point out an obvious misunderstanding of the involved parties: On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 02:51:06PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > [...] > now, it so happens in the case of HDMI that you can simply put an > HDMI connector on the product what you CANNOT AND MUST NOT DO is > put the *WORD* "HDMI" anywhere on your product, because that has > SPECIFIC implications that the seller of that product HAS GONE THROUGH > THE CERTIFICATION PROCESS. Without a "product" and a "seller" there can be no infringement. A hobby project can exist and be publicly discussed and documented without being either a product or sold. Over and out, Erik -- Do things that have never been done before. -- Russell Kirsch ___ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk