Re: SRM assign to submitter for On Behalf Of

2012-09-08 Thread Carl Wilson
Hi,

the Coordinator is configured on the SRD and set through workflow when the
request is submitted, so you would need to bypass this workflow to set the
Coordinator to someone other than the configured value.

 

Cheers

Carl

 

http://www.missingpiecessoftware.com/

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Pierson, Shawn
Sent: 07 September 2012 21:00
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: SRM assign to submitter for On Behalf Of

 

** 

I haven't done that, but at least with an advanced interface form I believe
that may be one of the (undocumented) things you can push to.  I have an AIF
that has some fields exposed to populate the Customer fields, so on this
specific request anyone that has access to it can submit it on behalf of
anyone else with a People record, bypassing the normal On Behalf Of
functionality and permissions.

 

Thanks,

 

Shawn Pierson 

Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer

 


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


Re: Email Engine Hanging

2012-09-08 Thread Teresa Fannin
I was wondering if keeping every email that has ever been sent on a system  
that is 4 years old with thousands of emails every day would decrease email 
 performance?
Teresa
 
In a message dated 9/7/2012 07:22:29 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
hbr4...@gmail.com writes:

I have  seen this on many versions. Enable email logging and look for a 
couple of  items.
1. Does the mail box your picking up from have a large number of  emails to 
be picked up?
2. Is the engine hanging on a type of email, maybe  with large attachments?
3. How much memory do you have on the server, how  much is allocated for 
the java process that the engine is using?
4. Before  you kill the engine, are you looking at the memory that it's  
using?


In the past I have seen three main reasons for the hanging  of the engine:

Memory,  bad email message (that could not be  processed, like an encrypted 
message), to many messages to be picked up (if  you are using inbound 
emails)..


Remember logging will  help.

Good luck and take care of you kidneys,

Howard

Sent  from one of Howard's iPads

On Sep 7, 2012, at 5:25 PM, Randeep Atwal  ratwals...@gmail.com wrote:

 Running a query (monitoring  tools usually have a db row count monitor) 
of the oldest unsent message  greater than x minutes ago is a way to 
understand if it's hung and automate a  restart.
 
 Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers  Wireless Network
 
 -Original Message-
  From: Boyd, Rebecca  boy...@wfu.edu
 Sender:   Action  Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:48:37 
 To:  arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Reply-To:  arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: Email Engine Hanging
 
  We run a PowerShell script which looks for error in the stderr.out  
log.
 
 
 On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Karthik  karthik...@gmail.com wrote:
 **
 
  Did you check if performance of remedy was good when the email engine  
was
 hung? Sometimes when the performance is not stable it tends to  hang. 
Also,
 are there any errors in the stderr.out log  file?
 
 Regards,
 Karthik
  
 On Sep 7, 2012 11:16 PM, Leonard Johnson  
leonard.john...@accenture.com
 wrote:
  
 hey all,
 
 Every now and then  our email engine hangs (hasnt everyone's?).  
Starting
 and  stopping this will get emails going again but I am wondering if  
anyone
 has used ProactiveNet or other monitoring to catch this  when it 
happens.
 Since the email Engine service is still  showing as running, I can't 
really
 use that for  monitoring.  Any idea of what log or method I can use to
  proactively catch this prior to customers calling to say they arent  
getting
 their notifications?
 
  I haven't dug very deep on this yet but this is always the place I  
find
 the right answers and putting it out to you all  first.
 
 Thanks for any input.
  
 LJ
 
 
  
___
  UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
  attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are
  
 _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers  Are_
 
 
 
 -- 
 Rebecca Boyd
  Application Administrator
 Wake Forest University
 
  
___
  UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 attend  wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are
 
  
___
  UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 attend  wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers  Are


___
UNSUBSCRIBE  or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12  www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers  Are

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


Re: SRM assign to submitter for On Behalf Of

2012-09-08 Thread Mohamed Abdelaziz
I am wondering why do you need to do that? This doesn't even align with the
tool/roles. Provided you can set the assignment of the Coordinator, that
means you will grant everyone in your organization the Service Request
Coordinator role. I assume that anyone can request on behalf of anyone in
your environment.  Usually, the coordinator should be a member of the
Service Desk, a member of the fulfillment group that the request is going to
or a special group with the coordinator role that is specifically
responsible to oversea and/or monitor the request from end to end ensuring
its completing and integrity. 

 

Moe

 

From: Pierson, Shawn [mailto:shawn.pier...@sug.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: SRM assign to submitter for On Behalf Of

 

** 

I haven't done that, but at least with an advanced interface form I believe
that may be one of the (undocumented) things you can push to.  I have an AIF
that has some fields exposed to populate the Customer fields, so on this
specific request anyone that has access to it can submit it on behalf of
anyone else with a People record, bypassing the normal On Behalf Of
functionality and permissions.

 

Thanks,

 

Shawn Pierson 

Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Logan, Kelly
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 2:09 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: SRM assign to submitter for On Behalf Of

 

** 

Hello all,

 

Best wishes for a lovely weekend! Until then however, I was wondering if
anyone has some ideas on how to set the 'Coordinator' for a Service Request
to the submitter of the request.

 

It seems like this would be a standard option, that if you are going to
submit a request on behalf of a customer, you would be the coordinator for
that request. Has anyone pursued this? 

 

Kelly Logan, Sr. Systems Administrator (Remedy, Planview), GMS

ProQuest | 789 E. Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346 | Ann Arbor MI
48106-1346 USA | 734.997.4777 

kelly.lo...@proquest.com

www.proquest.com 

 

ProQuest...Start here. 2010 InformationWeek 500 Top Innovator

 

P Please consider the environment before printing this email. 

 

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the sender, and
delete the message from your computer.

 

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ 

Private and confidential as detailed here
http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail . If you cannot access
hyperlink, please e-mail sender. 

_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ 


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are


Re: Email Engine Hanging

2012-09-08 Thread Howard Richter
It would not slow the email engine, however, the logic in the arsystem could be 
impacted.

We only save 30 days back and saw a little performance bounce.

Enjoy the weekend

Howard 

Sent from my iPhone 4

On Sep 8, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Teresa Fannin teresasfan...@aol.com wrote:

 **
 I was wondering if keeping every email that has ever been sent on a system 
 that is 4 years old with thousands of emails every day would decrease email  
 performance?
 Teresa
 In a message dated 9/7/2012 07:22:29 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
 hbr4...@gmail.com writes:
 I have seen this on many versions. Enable email logging and look for a couple 
 of items.
 1. Does the mail box your picking up from have a large number of emails to be 
 picked up?
 2. Is the engine hanging on a type of email, maybe with large attachments?
 3. How much memory do you have on the server, how much is allocated for the 
 java process that the engine is using?
 4. Before you kill the engine, are you looking at the memory that it's using?
 
 
 In the past I have seen three main reasons for the hanging of the engine:
 
 Memory,  bad email message (that could not be processed, like an encrypted 
 message), to many messages to be picked up (if you are using inbound emails)..
 
 
 Remember logging will help.
 
 Good luck and take care of you kidneys,
 
 Howard
 
 Sent from one of Howard's iPads
 
 On Sep 7, 2012, at 5:25 PM, Randeep Atwal ratwals...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Running a query (monitoringtools usually have a db row count monitor) 
  of the oldest unsent message greater than x minutes ago is a way to 
  understand if it's hung and automate a restart.
  
  Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Boyd, Rebeccaboy...@wfu.edu
  Sender:   Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
  arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:48:37 
  To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  Reply-To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  Subject: Re: Email Engine Hanging
  
  We run a PowerShell script which looks for error in the stderr.out log.
  
  
  On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Karthik karthik...@gmail.com wrote:
  **
  
  Did you check if performance of remedy was good when the email engine was
  hung? Sometimes when the performance is not stable it tends to hang. Also,
  are there any errors in the stderr.out log file?
  
  Regards,
  Karthik
  
  On Sep 7, 2012 11:16 PM, Leonard Johnson leonard.john...@accenture.com
  wrote:
  
  hey all,
  
  Every now and then our email engine hangs (hasnt everyone's?).  Starting
  and stopping this will get emails going again but I am wondering if anyone
  has used ProactiveNet or other monitoring to catch this when it happens.
  Since the email Engine service is still showing as running, I can't really
  use that for monitoring.  Any idea of what log or method I can use to
  proactively catch this prior to customers calling to say they arent 
  getting
  their notifications?
  
  I haven't dug very deep on this yet but this is always the place I find
  the right answers and putting it out to you all first.
  
  Thanks for any input.
  
  LJ
  
  
  ___
  UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
  attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are
  
  _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_
  
  
  
  -- 
  Rebecca Boyd
  Application Administrator
  Wake Forest University
  
  ___
  UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
  attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are
  
  ___
  UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
  attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are
 
 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are
 _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are