Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Module that works in Asterisk 1.0.x and 1.2.x
Juan Jose Comellas wrote: Yes, but ASTERISK_VERSION is a string and it's not usable for conditional compilation. In my current installation it looks like this: CVS-v1-2-11/17/05-09:29:21. We need something that can used from an #ifdef. ASTERISK_VERSION_NUM is an option, but it's not available in 1.0.x. Then how about: #ifdef ASTERISK_VERSION_NUM # if ASTERISK_VERSION_NUM ... /* version-specific code */ ... # else /* other version specific code */ ... # endif /* must be version 1.0.x */ ... #endif Martin ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Install destination on Solaris
On Thursday 17 Nov 2005 19:28, tim panton wrote: On 17 Nov 2005, at 17:25, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Simon Lockhart wrote: Yes. There's the Sun way, and then the way that everyone else does it. If you take a look at sunfreeware.com, you'll find that everything installs into /usr/local because that's where everyone who wasn't indoctrinated into the Sun way of doing things places stuff. Understandable... I don't know of any good solution to this problem then. If enough Solaris users get together and decide the default install paths should be different, then we can change it, but I'd like to see a reasonable consensus on the topic before I tell the Sun people that we are disregarding their suggestion :-) The history here is that in classic Solaris /usr can be mounted read only by a roomful of diskless devices. This means that you didn't put _anything_ in /usr that hadn't come off the OS disk. Hence the reason why /usr/local usually went on a separate partition. B ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
[Asterisk-Dev] Version 1.2.0 chan_h323 (ooh323c)
Title: Version 1.2.0 chan_h323 (ooh323c) Has anyone tested this channel from the release versions of asterisk-addons? It compiles fine, make install fails, but can be manually copied to the modules directory. I noticed the channel name has changed to chan_ooh323, so I added it to modules.conf. It loads but does not register a channeltype. I am working my way through the channel driver, but wondered if anyone has been successful or might know why it fails. Dan ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
RE: [Asterisk-Dev] Version 1.2.0 chan_h323 (ooh323c)
Title: Version 1.2.0 chan_h323 (ooh323c) Nevermind. The config file needed to be renamed to ooh323.conf Thanks, Dan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan AustinSent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 3:25 PMTo: Asterisk Developers Mailing ListSubject: [Asterisk-Dev] Version 1.2.0 chan_h323 (ooh323c) Has anyone tested this channel from the release versions of asterisk-addons? It compiles fine, make install fails, but can be manually copied to the modules directory. I noticed the channel name has changed to chan_ooh323, so I added it to modules.conf. It loads but does not register a channeltype. I am working my way through the channel driver, but wondered if anyone has been successful or might know why it fails. Dan ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Version 1.2.0 chan_h323 (ooh323c)
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 03:24:47PM -0800, Dan Austin wrote: Has anyone tested this channel from the release versions of asterisk-addons? It compiles fine, make install fails, but can be manually copied to the modules directory. I noticed the channel name has changed to chan_ooh323, so I added it to modules.conf. For the record, chan_ooh323c from asterisk-addons is something completely different than chan_h323 from asterisk/channels/h323 . The latter requires the openh323 beast. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 +972-50-7952406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Install destination on Solaris
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 07:28:36PM +, tim panton wrote: The history here is that in classic Solaris /usr can be mounted read only by a roomful of diskless devices. This means that you didn't put _anything_ in /usr that hadn't come off the OS disk. Since no-one has bought a diskless Sun for 10 years, I guess it is probably not an issue these days, but it will still be in the official rule book :-) . Historically, /usr/local is a NFS share shared by all the local systems. Thus you build asterisk once on /usr/local and it should work for all of your systems. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 +972-50-7952406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
RE: [Asterisk-Dev] Version 1.2.0 chan_h323 (ooh323c)
Yup. I wondered why the first couple releases of the ooH323c channel driver were named chan_h323 in conflict with asterisk/channels/h323. It seems someone corrected the conflict, and I didn't notice. The INSTALL file doesn't note the change, and I had a working config from an earlier release, so I did not 'make samples'. Easy problem, easy fix. Thanks, Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 4:06 PM To: asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Version 1.2.0 chan_h323 (ooh323c) On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 03:24:47PM -0800, Dan Austin wrote: Has anyone tested this channel from the release versions of asterisk-addons? It compiles fine, make install fails, but can be manually copied to the modules directory. I noticed the channel name has changed to chan_ooh323, so I added it to modules.conf. For the record, chan_ooh323c from asterisk-addons is something completely different than chan_h323 from asterisk/channels/h323 . The latter requires the openh323 beast. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 +972-50-7952406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Install destination on Solaris
Simon Lockhart said: All, I'm just testing out asterisk-1.2.0 on Solaris, and apart from finding a couple of Makefile compatibility issues (oops, should have does this before 1.2.0 was released, but assumed other Solaris people would have looked at it - patch being submitted to bugtracker shortly), I've noticed that someone has snuck in a change to the install destination for Solaris, which I'm not in favour of, so I'm asking here for some ideas for the best way to fix this. On linux (and all other platforms except Solaris), asterisk ends up in: /etc/asterisk/ /usr/lib/asterisk /var/lib/asterisk /var/spool/asterisk /usr/sbin [etc] On Solaris (now), it ends up in: /opt/asterisk/... /var/opt/asterisk/ /etc/opt/asterisk/ ... Thoughts? Simon These are the official locations on Solaris, for a package named asterisk. This has been the standard (on Solaris) for at least a decade. I believe that Asterisk should comply with platform conventions where practical, and this is one of those times. Stephen Uhler Sun Microsystems ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Install destination on Solaris
On Nov 17, 2005, at 6:28 PM, Stephen Uhler wrote: Simon Lockhart said: All, I'm just testing out asterisk-1.2.0 on Solaris, and apart from finding a couple of Makefile compatibility issues (oops, should have does this before 1.2.0 was released, but assumed other Solaris people would have looked at it - patch being submitted to bugtracker shortly), I've noticed that someone has snuck in a change to the install destination for Solaris, which I'm not in favour of, so I'm asking here for some ideas for the best way to fix this. On linux (and all other platforms except Solaris), asterisk ends up in: /etc/asterisk/ /usr/lib/asterisk /var/lib/asterisk /var/spool/asterisk /usr/sbin [etc] On Solaris (now), it ends up in: /opt/asterisk/... /var/opt/asterisk/ /etc/opt/asterisk/ ... Thoughts? Simon These are the official locations on Solaris, for a package named asterisk. This has been the standard (on Solaris) for at least a decade. I believe that Asterisk should comply with platform conventions where practical, and this is one of those times. How about no. Or do end-users not have any input? :) Make it configurable as Simon suggests. Then I can install it where it makes sense to me, and others can install it where it makes sense to them. Because that's how we've always done it always fails to impress me as a good reason for anything. If there is an actual compelling reason to do so, sure. Stephen Uhler Sun Microsystems Chris Parker A Sun Microsystems Customer -- \\\|||/// \ Chris Parker- Segmentation Fault ( core dumped ) \ ~ ~ / \ | @ @ |\ http://www.segv.org |[EMAIL PROTECTED] oOo (_) oOo \ # OS's are nothing more than device drivers! # ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
[Asterisk-Dev] app_page
I'm wanting to alter app_page so that I can specify an Alert Info sip
header to send (our Polycoms are set to auto answer on that one).
Eventually I would want to make it customizable, but for a first test
I thought I'd try the following:
snip from app_page.c
static void *page_thread(void *data)
{
struct calloutdata *cd = data;
struct ast_variable *var = ast_variable_new(Alert Info,
Ring Answer);
ast_pbx_outgoing_app(cd-tech, AST_FORMAT_SLINEAR, cd-resource, 3,
MeetMe, cd-meetmeopts, NULL, 0, cd-cidnum,
cd-cidname, var, NULL);
free(cd);
return NULL;
}
/snip
The variable doesn't seem to be delivered to the paged phone(s). Am I
missing something, or perhaps using the wrong call?
Thanks,
--
===
Michael Anderson
___
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] app_page
On 11/17/05, Michael Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wanting to alter app_page so that I can specify an Alert Info sip
header to send (our Polycoms are set to auto answer on that one).
Eventually I would want to make it customizable, but for a first test
I thought I'd try the following:
snip from app_page.c
static void *page_thread(void *data)
{
struct calloutdata *cd = data;
struct ast_variable *var = ast_variable_new(Alert Info,
Ring Answer);
ast_pbx_outgoing_app(cd-tech, AST_FORMAT_SLINEAR, cd-resource, 3,
MeetMe, cd-meetmeopts, NULL, 0, cd-cidnum,
cd-cidname, var, NULL);
free(cd);
return NULL;
}
/snip
The variable doesn't seem to be delivered to the paged phone(s). Am I
missing something, or perhaps using the wrong call?
Thanks,
Michael,
I think you're looking for the pbx_builtin_setvar_helper function.
Doxygen docs about Asterisk functions can be found at
http://www.asterisk.org/doxygen/
BJ
--
Bird's The Word Technologies, Inc.
http://www.btwtech.com/
___
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] gmake error for asterisk-addons-1.2.0
Vahan Yerkanian wrote: I'm getting the following error while compiling asterisk-addons-1.2.0 on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE box (asterisk-addons from cvs compiled ok) You need to run make install on asterisk before building -addons. Russell ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Re: [Asterisk-Dev] app_page
Call through the local channel and add the alert_info headers. /O ___ Asterisk-Dev mailing list Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
