Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoipJet Terms of Service

2005-03-16 Thread Michael Puchol

Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
But then again come to them with a few million monthly minutes under 
your belt and I'm sure they'll change the TOS for you...
Maybe not, as the ToS also state:
The customer agrees to purchase VoipJet termination in small amounts
What does this mean? We have to start with 5-minute calls max, then
slowly increase absolute timeout? How small is small?
How about this one:
VOIPJET DOES NOT SUGGEST, AND VEHEMENTLY DENIES, ANY CLAIM THAT ITS
VOIP SERVICES HAVE A LEVEL OF QUALITY OR RELIABILITY ANYWHERE NEAR THAT
OF THE REGULAR PHONE SYSTEM
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA this is like saying our system sucks and we know 
it. How can they seriously expect anyone that reads this ToS to want to 
sign up with them? It would have been simpler to simply state the usual 
we cannot guarantee 100% reliability or availability of our service, 
which depends on third parties over which we have no control or 
something along these lines.

Nice laugh, best regards,
Mike
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Agent groups broken in queues? (do not follow strategy)

2005-03-16 Thread Bill Petrisko
I attempted setting up a queue with agents that log in, and
get called with incoming calls:

Agents log in using:
  exten = *88,1,AgentCallbackLogin(${CALLERIDNUM}|[EMAIL PROTECTED])

Calls get into the queue with:
  exten = 6029995654,1,Queue(test-noc|t|||60)

queues.conf:
  [test-noc]
  strategy = rrmemory
  context = test-sip
  timeout = 10
  retry = 4
  member = Agent/@2

agents.conf:
  [agents]
  ackcall=no
  group=2
  agent = 6029995670,,Joe Bob
  agent = 6029995671,,Billy Dude

Agents can log in fine, but all calls end up at the phone of 
the first agent to log in.  Always.  No matter how many people
are logged in as agents.

After beating myself up on this all night (and then finally getting
into the wiki after it was unavailable) - I come up with the following
note in the queue config section:

   http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+config+queues.conf
   
   If you include groups in your queue definition the calls get 
   routed in the order of the group regardless of the specified 
   strategy. So I just have a member= line for each agent. 

Is this really true?

If so, what is the point of having the ability for people to log
in/out, if it completely ignores the strategy for call distribution?

Anyone know of any plans of fixing or improving this behavior, to 
make logged in agents consistent with 'permanent' agents?

Or is there something i'm missing, and there really is a way to have
a dynamic agent follow the call strategy?

Also, in a ringall strategy, is there a maximum number of destinations?
(Either known in the code, or if someone has tested to an unusually
high number?)

Any information appreciated!

thanks
bill
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Best DB

2005-03-16 Thread tim panton
On 15 Mar 2005, at 23:52, Giudice, Salvatore wrote:
we were able to handle a peak of 700k inserts per hour. MySQL gave us
very few problems and probably had a cumulative downtime of
approximately 4 days per year until the project was decommissioned. 
When
y
That's more than 1% downtime, not even two nines .
What's your downtime worth per day?
http://www.westhawk.co.uk/
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime does not work yet, ... *bug*

2005-03-16 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:25:17PM +0800, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
 Mar 16 15:13:45 DEBUG[29502]: Raw Hangup 69.73.19.178:4569, src=14, dst=1259
 Mar 16 15:13:45 DEBUG[29502]: MySQL RealTime: Update SQL: UPDATE 
 sip_buddies SET name = '621' WHERE allow = 'g729'
 Mar 16 15:13:45 DEBUG[29502]: MySQL RealTime: Everything is fine.
 Mar 16 15:13:45 DEBUG[29502]: MySQL RealTime: Updated 0 rows on table: 
 sip_buddies

*ALARM* Where is that query fron? It's totally wrong! It just changed the
name of anyone who is allowed to use g729.

Looks like Realtime is not quite there yet for production...

Have a nice day,
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout
Ecomtel Pty Ltd
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] chan_oh323.c:2501 ast_oh323_new: Internal channel initialization failed. Bad binary?

2005-03-16 Thread Kamran Ahmad
hello

i try to call from sip phone on asteris to open phone
on GnuGK.
can any one tell me why it is saying

chan_oh323.c:2501 ast_oh323_new: Internal channel
initialization failed. Bad binary?
Mar 16 13:28:46 WARNING[5963]: chan_oh323.c:2727
oh323_request: Failed to create new H.323 private
structure 4.
Mar 16 13:28:46 NOTICE[5963]: app_dial.c:749
dial_exec: Unable to create channel of type 'OH323'
We're at 192.168.0.203 port 17456


Sip read:
INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.0.153;branch=z9hG4bK2038176231
From:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 21 INVITE
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Max-Forwards: 5
User-Agent:SKYPHONE/1.03
Subject: hello
Expires: 120
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, OPTIONS,
REFER,SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, MESSAGE
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length:180
Proxy-Authorization: Digest
username=2000,realm=asterisk,nonce=6ebe9c68,uri=sip:192.168.0.203,response=7027ef8069a0ef7a5f8089fda2fc0e87
  
  
  
  
v=0
o=sibtay 2890844 842807 IN IP4 192.168.0.153
s=SDP Seminar
c=IN IP4 192.168.0.153
t=0 0
m=audio 13064 RTP/AVP 0 101
a=rtpmap:101 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:96 0-11,16
  
  
  
  
15 headers, 11 lines
Using latest request as basis request
Sending to 192.168.0.153 : 5060 (non-NAT)
Found RTP audio format 0
Found RTP audio format 101
Peer audio RTP is at port 192.168.0.153:13064
Found description format PCMU
Found description format telephone-event
Capabilities: us - 0x8000e (gsm|ulaw|alaw|h263), peer
- audio=0x4 (ulaw)/video=0x0 (nothing), combined - 0x4
(ulaw)
Non-codec capabilities: us - 0x1 (g723), peer - 0x1
(g723), combined - 0x1 (g723)
Found user '2000'
Looking for 321 in default
list_route: hop: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transmitting (no NAT):
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.0.153;branch=z9hG4bK2038176231
From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as61b12c41
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 21 INVITE
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Length: 0
  
  
  
  
 to 192.168.0.153:5060
Mar 16 13:28:34 ERROR[5963]: chan_oh323.c:2501
ast_oh323_new: Internal channel initialization failed.
Bad binary?
Mar 16 13:28:34 WARNING[5963]: chan_oh323.c:2727
oh323_request: Failed to create new H.323 private
structure 3.
Mar 16 13:28:34 NOTICE[5963]: app_dial.c:749
dial_exec: Unable to create channel of type 'OH323'
  
  
*CLI
*CLI
  
  
Sip read:
INFO sip:172.16.0.32 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.153
From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sip:172.16.0.32
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 22 INFO
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: application/dtmf-relay
Content-Length: 26
  
  
  
  
  
  
Signal= 8
Duration= 160
  
  
9 headers, 4 lines
Receiving DTMF!
* DTMF received: '8'
Transmitting (no NAT):
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.153
From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sip:172.16.0.32;tag=as61b12c41
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 22 INFO
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Length: 0
  
  
  
  
 to 192.168.0.153:5060
  
  
  
  
Sip read:
INFO sip:172.16.0.32 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.153
From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sip:172.16.0.32
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 23 INFO
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: application/dtmf-relay
Content-Length: 26
  

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime does not work yet, ... *bug*

2005-03-16 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:25:17PM +0800, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
 

Mar 16 15:13:45 DEBUG[29502]: Raw Hangup 69.73.19.178:4569, src=14, dst=1259
Mar 16 15:13:45 DEBUG[29502]: MySQL RealTime: Update SQL: UPDATE 
sip_buddies SET name = '621' WHERE allow = 'g729'
Mar 16 15:13:45 DEBUG[29502]: MySQL RealTime: Everything is fine.
Mar 16 15:13:45 DEBUG[29502]: MySQL RealTime: Updated 0 rows on table: 
sip_buddies
   

*ALARM* Where is that query fron? It's totally wrong! It just changed the
name of anyone who is allowed to use g729.
Looks like Realtime is not quite there yet for production...
Have a nice day,
 

vpbx*CLI help realtime update
Usage: realtime update family colmatch value
  Update a single variable using the RealTime driver.
(I guess Matthew typed to fast to give me the hint, ...)
Thanks for pointing it out, it should therefore be:
vpbx*CLI realtime update sippeers name 621 allow ulaw,alaw
However, it shows:
vpbx*CLI realtime load sippeers name 621
  Column Name  Column Value 
    
   id  1
 name  621  
 callerid  Demo,621 
  canreinvite  yes  
  context  inhouse  
 dtmfmode  rfc2833  
 host  dynamic  
  mailbox  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  nat  yes  
  pickupgroup  1
  qualify  999  
   secret  Morgen621
 type  friend   
 username  621  
allow  ulaw,alaw
 disallow  all  
   regseconds  0
   cancallforward  yes  

... so it has updated it!!!
... but:
vpbx*CLI sip show peer 621
vpbx*CLI
 * Name   : 621
 Secret   : Set
 MD5Secret: Not set
 Context  : inhouse
 Language :
 AMA flags: Unknown
 CallingPres  : Presentation Allowed, Not Screened
 Callgroup:
 Pickupgroup  : 1, 33
 Mailbox  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 LastMsgsSent : 2
 Inc. limit   : 0
 Outg. limit  : 0
 Dynamic  : Yes
 Callerid : Demo 621
 Expire   : 140506
 Expiry   : 900
 Insecure : no
 Nat  : Always
 ACL  : No
 CanReinvite  : Yes
 PromiscRedir : No
 User=Phone   : No
 DTMFmode : rfc2833
 LastMsg  : 0
 ToHost   :
 Addr-IP : 192.168.250.114 Port 5060
 Defaddr-IP  : 0.0.0.0 Port 5060
 Def. Username: 621
 Codecs   : 0x0 (nothing)
 Codec Order  : (none)
 Status   : OK (5 ms)
 Useragent: Grandstream BT100 1.0.5.18
 Full Contact : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:64655
so, two different ways of the same query gives two different results!
I agree with you, ... there is something not completely working ;-)
bye
Ronald
--
Ronald Wiplinger  (CEO of ELMIT)
http://www.elmit.com+886 (0) 939--77-55-16  or FWD 511208
- I'm a SpamCon Foundation Member, #694, Verify it at http://www.spamcon.org
PS: Spam prevention!
Our system is protected with a spam prevention program. 
If you send us an e-mail, our system will send you a confirmation message back. Just reply to this confirmation message please. 
After receiving this confirmation message, our system will send the hold message (one) and all future messages (after the received confirmation message) to me without asking you again.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Help with simple H323 settings

2005-03-16 Thread Tim Mickelson
 Hi,
 I have about one year of experience with Asterisk, working with ZAP 
(digium, junghanns) ZAPHFC, SIP and IAX. These technologies are quite 
clear to me, the problem is that I have no experience with H323, but 
now, I need to use this also.
 The problem that I have is very trivial, so I think that this should 
be a very easy question for you guys whom know how it works.
 All I want to do, is use a H323 phone, SJPhone on my Asterisk. I have 
compiled the H323 of asterisk, i.e. not OH323. With the configuration 
below, I can make a call from my H323 phone, make it enter in it's 
context in the dialplan (from-h323 in my h323.conf). So in this 
direction all is ok. My problem is the other direction, calling with my 
SIP phone, I'm not able to make the H323 phone ring. Instead Asterisk 
tells me no one is available to answer at this time, but if I've 
called my SIP phone seconds before, it works (?!).
 I'd be really happy if someone could give me a simple, working 
h323.conf, and the correct dial syntax for extensions.conf.

 Tim
h323.conf
[general]
port = 1720
bindaddr = 0.0.0.0
context=h323
disallow=all
allow=alaw
gatekeeper=DISABLE
[114]
type=user
context=from-h323
host=192.168.1.164
extensions.conf
exten = _2.,1,Dial(H323/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
asterisk says:
   -- Executing Dial(SIP/116-94e6, H323/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) in new stack
16:41:01.344ThreadID=0x441d4bb0   h323ep.cxx(1323)  H323
Making call to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]
16:41:11.345H225 Caller:815b200   transports.cxx(1587)  H323TCP 
Could not connect to 192.168.1.164:1720 (local port=0) - Connection 
timed out(110)
16:41:11.345H225 Caller:815b200 h323.cxx(1445)  H225
Sending release complete PDU: callRef=10466
16:41:11.347   H323 Cleaner h323.cxx(1542)  H323
Connection ip$localhost/10466 terminated.
 == No one is available to answer at this time
   -- Executing Hangup(SIP/116-94e6, ) in new stack
 == Spawn extension (from-sip, 22, 2) exited non-zero on 'SIP/116-94e6'

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Calling Card Application - which one ?

2005-03-16 Thread Peter Illmayer
Hello

I'm interested in setting up a calling card application on asterisk.  I
noticed a number in the wiki, both free and commercial.  To experiment with,
I'm after a GNU licenced app...Which one would you recommend ?

Regards..Peter

--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Calls from web interface

2005-03-16 Thread Chris Blake
Greetings *`s,

There was a thread some time back about making calls via * from a web
interface...ie user clicks number on web page and call is made...

I`ve googled with a few words, checked the wiki, and tried to scan
through the archives, but no joy...

Any links/pointers/keywords appreciated...

Regards

--
Chris Blake 
Cell: 082 775 1492
Work: +27 11 782 0840
Fax : +27 11 782 0841
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I loved her with a love thirsty and desperate. I felt that we two might
commit some act so atrocious that the world, seeing us, would find it
irresistible. -- Gene Wolfe, The Shadow of the Torturer


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Unknown signalling 896?

2005-03-16 Thread Eric Wieling
David Zanetti wrote:
I've been beating my head a bit against the 1.0.6 Debian builds of
Asterisk, using an E100P (E1, single span) board.
In machines I've built in the past (back in 1.0.0 days), config I'm
using and that card and 1.0.0 driver combo worked fine.
ztcfg reports no problems:
SPAN 1: CCS/HDB3 Build-out: 0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1)
31 channels configured.
And zttool sees the card, and reports it in the state I expect (there's
no real E1 attached to it, so blue/red alarms..)
But * won't bring up chan_zap at all:
ERROR[2215]: Signalling requested is PRI Signalling but line is
in Unknown signalling 896 signalling
ERROR[2215]: Unable to register channel '1-30'
WARNING[2215]: chan_zap.so: load_module failed, returning -1
WARNING[2215]: Loading module chan_zap.so failed!
Ideas? I'm sure it's something simple I've missed. :)
Config fragments follow:
==/etc/zaptel.conf==
span=1,0,0,ccs,hdb3
bchan=1-15,17-31
dchan=16
loadzone=nz
defaultzone=nz
==end==
==/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf==
context = default
switchtype = euroisdn
priindication = outofband
group = 2
signalling = pri_cpe
channel = 1-30
==end==
Notice the [channels] lines at the top of the zaptel.conf.sample?  You 
need it.

--Eric
--
Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest.
Mark Twain
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] meetme2 and meetme

2005-03-16 Thread Vamsi Pottangi
Yes, you could use MeetMe2 and MeetMe simultaneously.

~Vamsi


On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:01:28 +0900, Kuniyoshi Murata
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 
 As I read http://www.areski.net/asterisk-meetme/about.php?s=0, meetme2
 seems attractive to me. My question here is...
 
 Can meetme2 and existing meetme can coexist and can be used whichever I want
 when I want to have a conference?
 
 Thanks for your input
 Kuni
 
 --
 Kuniyoshi Murata.iChat/AIM:macwebcaster
 English-Japanese Interpreter mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Macintosh Webcast Specialisthttp://www.macwebcaster.com
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] AGI kill

2005-03-16 Thread Pepe Aracil
Hello.

When the caller hangup  the phone, asterisk kills my AGI python script without 
notification.
I caught all signals, but none was trigered.
How can i trap this event to resume some operations.

Sorry for my poor english :)
Thanks.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] live monitoring of SIP calls chan_spy

2005-03-16 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 11:06:08AM +, Atif Rasheed wrote:
 hello there,
 I have searched lists about an application chan_spy, people talked about 
 it on lists that we can use it to monitor sip to sip calls. but I am 
 unable to find any clue of it.
 can some one please tell me from where I can get this chan-spy application

Maybe it's been replaced by the Monitor app?

Or does it do something else?
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout
Ecomtel Pty Ltd
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] AGI kill

2005-03-16 Thread Nir Simionovich
Hi Pepe,

  You can't! As far as I can tell, once Asterisk eliminates an AGI upon
hangup, it doesn't send any signal information to the AGI script. If you
need to run some clean ups, the proper way to do so would be to execute
an AGI upon hangup, utilizing DeadAGI.

Nir S

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pepe Aracil
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 12:21 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] AGI kill

Hello.

When the caller hangup  the phone, asterisk kills my AGI python script
without 
notification.
I caught all signals, but none was trigered.
How can i trap this event to resume some operations.

Sorry for my poor english :)
Thanks.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call Center software opensource or commercial

2005-03-16 Thread Patrick
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 13:24 -0500, Erick Perez wrote:
 im my case im looking into 100 seats initially and going up to 1000 at
 the end (over a 18 months period).
 Looks like we will have to develop *a lot* if we want to use * for it.
 Maybe a commercial solution will be better at this time.

On Cebit SGI announced a server solution based on Signate software
(which is based on Asterisk) that can handle up to 5000 simultaneous
calls. I don't know how the marketing drones have cooked up that number
but perhaps it's interesting. See 
http://www.sgi.com/company_info/newsroom/press_releases/2005/march/von.html

Regards,
Patrick 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] AGI kill

2005-03-16 Thread Stefan Reuter
   You can't! As far as I can tell, once Asterisk eliminates an AGI upon
 hangup, it doesn't send any signal information to the AGI script. If you
 need to run some clean ups, the proper way to do so would be to execute
 an AGI upon hangup, utilizing DeadAGI.

You can also use FastAGI instead of AGI over stdin/stdout. When using
FastAGI hangup only caused the network connection to be closed but after
that you can do any clean up you want.

=Stefan

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Problem with TE405P and Slackware 10.0

2005-03-16 Thread pixer
Hi Andrew,
thank you for the reply.

I have following your advice and I have put this into /etc/lilo.conf

append = pci=noacpi


Now proc/interrupts he returns me this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /proc/interrupts
   CPU0
  0:1983298IO-APIC-edge  timer
  1:382IO-APIC-edge  i8042
  2:  0  XT-PIC  cascade
  8:  1IO-APIC-edge  rtc
 14:   1989IO-APIC-edge  ide0
 17:  0   IO-APIC-level  Intel ICH5
 20:  0   IO-APIC-level  t4xxp
 22:   1665   IO-APIC-level  eth0
NMI:  0
LOC:1983358
ERR:  0
MIS:  0

I have tried also to recompile the kernel (2.6.11.3) removing all the unused


modules (COM port, serial ports, etc), and shuffling the card around to a 

different PCI slot, but unfortunately he does yet not work equally :/


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Call Center software opensource or commercial

2005-03-16 Thread Nir Simionovich
Well,

  It all depends what you want to do. We've already implemented a system
that can handle roughly 1000 channels of SIP using Asterisk. Of course we
used an Intel Cluster to reach that number, but the possibility exists. 

  It's all a question of design. I admit that using Asterisk would require
some development efforts on the Call Centre's side, but the solution will be
much more robust than any available solution on the market.

  One of our clients is actually thinking of dropping their brand new AVAYA
CTI system, and switch to asterisk. 

Nir S

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 12:58 PM
To: Erick Perez; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call Center software opensource or commercial

On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 13:24 -0500, Erick Perez wrote:
 im my case im looking into 100 seats initially and going up to 1000 at
 the end (over a 18 months period).
 Looks like we will have to develop *a lot* if we want to use * for it.
 Maybe a commercial solution will be better at this time.

On Cebit SGI announced a server solution based on Signate software
(which is based on Asterisk) that can handle up to 5000 simultaneous
calls. I don't know how the marketing drones have cooked up that number
but perhaps it's interesting. See 
http://www.sgi.com/company_info/newsroom/press_releases/2005/march/von.html

Regards,
Patrick 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] AGI kill

2005-03-16 Thread Nir Simionovich
You are correct, FastAGI is a valid option. However, if he's basing his
application on Asterisk Stable, FastAGI is not available in the stable
version.

Nir S

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefan Reuter
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 12:57 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] AGI kill

   You can't! As far as I can tell, once Asterisk eliminates an AGI upon
 hangup, it doesn't send any signal information to the AGI script. If you
 need to run some clean ups, the proper way to do so would be to execute
 an AGI upon hangup, utilizing DeadAGI.

You can also use FastAGI instead of AGI over stdin/stdout. When using
FastAGI hangup only caused the network connection to be closed but after
that you can do any clean up you want.

=Stefan

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] live monitoring of SIP calls chan_spy

2005-03-16 Thread Stefan Reuter
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 11:38 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
 Maybe it's been replaced by the Monitor app?
 Or does it do something else?

The Monitor application records calls and writes wav files it does not
allow real time spying.

ChanSpy seems to have disappeared. The bug 2379 that formerly contained
the patch is no longer available in the bug tracker.
See http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+cmd+ChanSpy

=Stefan


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] AGI kill

2005-03-16 Thread Stefan Reuter
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 13:08 +0200, Nir Simionovich wrote:
 You are correct, FastAGI is a valid option. However, if he's basing his
 application on Asterisk Stable, FastAGI is not available in the stable
 version.

My version of Asterisk 1.0.6 includes FastAGI support and works pretty
well.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Calls from web interface

2005-03-16 Thread Stefan Reuter
 There was a thread some time back about making calls via * from a web
 interface...ie user clicks number on web page and call is made...

There are basically two ways to implement this.

The first one assumes that your webserver is running on the same machine
as Asterisk. Then your web application will have to create a .call file
in /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing.
Examples on how do this are available at
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+auto-dial+out

The second option is to use the Manager API which allows you to trigger
a call via TCP/IP.
For more information see
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+manager+dialout
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+manager+api

=Stefan

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] AGI kill

2005-03-16 Thread Nir Simionovich
Oops, you are correct, FastAgi is available in 1.0.6, my mistake

Nir S

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefan Reuter
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 1:11 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] AGI kill

On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 13:08 +0200, Nir Simionovich wrote:
 You are correct, FastAGI is a valid option. However, if he's basing his
 application on Asterisk Stable, FastAGI is not available in the stable
 version.

My version of Asterisk 1.0.6 includes FastAGI support and works pretty
well.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Calls from web interface

2005-03-16 Thread Nir Simionovich
Those are the two valid methods. However, if you intend to generate many
calls, using the spool directory isn't a good method, as the spool is a very
slow means to do so. Using the manager proves more efficient for this task.

Nir S

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefan Reuter
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 1:15 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Calls from web interface

 There was a thread some time back about making calls via * from a web
 interface...ie user clicks number on web page and call is made...

There are basically two ways to implement this.

The first one assumes that your webserver is running on the same machine
as Asterisk. Then your web application will have to create a .call file
in /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing.
Examples on how do this are available at
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+auto-dial+out

The second option is to use the Manager API which allows you to trigger
a call via TCP/IP.
For more information see
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+manager+dialout
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+manager+api

=Stefan

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Kernel 2.4 or 2.6 for the latest asterisk ? ?

2005-03-16 Thread Brett, Gary
Thanks for that, I am however slightly concerned that due to the fast moving
asterisk project (with new versions coming out regularly) that digium may
start phasing out support for 2.4 kernel, I would like to settle on an OS
for my customers and don't want to have to readdress the situation in one
year because the 2.4 kernel is no longer the supported /stable version. Does
anybody believe this likely to happen??

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Ariel Batista [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 15 March 2005 15:00
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Kernel 2.4 or 2.6 for the latest asterisk ??

This question really has no one reply.  The different Linux builds all have
there reasons.  If your used to Fedora Core 1 then that is what you should
use. I use CentOS which is a clone of RHEL 3.  They have just released there
Version 4 which is based on RHEL 4.  It works and since I am used to the way
RH does there settings I like it.  But it's really up to you. Fedora is good
and works. I just don't use it do to it's mainly for RH to develop there
newer system from it.  

But I know that many use without problem Debian, Fedora, Slackware, Gentoo
and many more. There is even a group that is working with FreeBSD.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett, Gary
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 5:47 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Kernel 2.4 or 2.6 for the latest asterisk ??

Hi there

Just a quick question. I have been playing around with asterisk CVS-1.0.02
on fedora core 1 (2.4 kernel) and I would like to have a look at asterisk v
1.0.6 but am still a little uncertain which linux kernel is best to run on
?, can I use Fedora Core 3 (is it the preferred kernel) or should I stick
with FC1

Ps - the only additional hardware in the box will be a digium single port E1

Any advice would be greatly appreciated

Gary
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] IPSwitchBoard BETA

2005-03-16 Thread Thorben Jensen
Hi all,

I have just published my last few weeks of hard work: IPSwitchBoard BETA.

Please let me know what you think and post comments on the Wiki.

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-IPSwitchBoard+BETA

Thank you

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Call Forward

2005-03-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
I found some problems using the call forward.
I'm using this simple configuration, but something goes wrong, can someone 
understand what is wrong and help me?

Thanks a lot


exten = _*5X.,1,DBput(CF/${CALLERIDNUM}=${EXTEN:2})
exten = _*5X.,2,Hangup

exten = *5,1,DBdel(CF/${CALLERIDNUM})
exten = *5,2,Hangup

[macro-stdexten]
;
; Standard extension macro (with call forwarding):
; ${ARG1} - Extension(we could have used ${MACRO_EXTEN} here as well
; ${ARG2} - Device(s) to ring
;
exten = s,1,DBget(temp=CF/${ARG1})
exten = s,2,Goto(${temp}|1)
exten = s,102,Goto(s|3)
exten = s,3,Dial(${ARG2},120)
exten = s,103,Goto(s|50)
exten = s,4,Voicemail(u${ARG1})
exten = s,5,Hangup
exten = s,104,Voicemail(b${ARG1}) ; busy
exten = s,105,Hangup






Navighi a 2 MEGA e i primi 3 mesi sono GRATIS. 
Scegli Libero Adsl Flat senza limiti su http://www.libero.it


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: chan_oh323.c ast_oh323_new Internal channel initialization failed

2005-03-16 Thread Kamran Ahmad
hello

i was searching for solution to problem (sip-h.323).
any one from this list asterisk mailing have any idea
how to fix it.

i am getting error when i try to call from sip to
h.323 user

i am successfully registering my asterisk box with
gnugk. but when i try to call to h.323 openphone on
working on GnuGatekeeper, asterisk is not routing it
to GnuGk. i am getting the following error. do you
have any idea. please help i am stuck here for a week.


i am unable to find anything on google on this topic.

-- Executing Dial(SIP/2000-ae3f,
OH323/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1720) in new stack
Mar 16 16:14:46 ERROR[16176]: chan_oh323.c:2501
ast_oh323_new: Internal channel initialization failed.
Bad binary?
Mar 16 16:14:46 WARNING[16176]: chan_oh323.c:2727
oh323_request: Failed to create new H.323 private
structure 1.
Mar 16 16:14:46 NOTICE[16176]: app_dial.c:749
dial_exec: Unable to create channel of type 'OH323' 
== Everyone is busy/congested at this time
Mar 16 16:20:55 WARNING[16176]: res_musiconhold.c:205
spawn_mp3: Found no files in
'/var/lib/asterisk/mohmp3'
Mar 16 16:20:55 WARNING[16176]: res_musiconhold.c:278
monmp3thread: unable to spawn mp3player
  
  
thanks
kamran



__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Best DB

2005-03-16 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On March 15, 2005 06:04 pm, Giudice, Salvatore wrote:
 commercial licensing AND has a real enterprise class support structure
 behind it, or are you going to run with PostgreSQL (bow wow) distributed
 under a BSD license with some mom and pop support shops and some mailing

It's time to put up or shut up.

Can you please give supporting evidence that MySQL AG has no more oomph in 
commercial support than companies like Command Prompt, Fujitsu, Red Hat, or 
even PostgreSQL, Inc.?  Every single one of those organizations has 
commercial support available for PostgreSQL.  I'm genuinely curious if you 
consider MySQL AG more of a company than Red Hat or Fujitsu.

Seriously.  You're frothing at the mouth and tripping over yourself trying to 
make your point, and you're so far off base to begin with that you couldn't 
possibly be more wrong.

As far as your benchmark points go, until you can show me properly organized 
and open benchmarks, your point is totally invalid.  In my cursory check 
(hint: try locating the open database bake-off from a couple years ago, 
phpbuilder's evaluation a few years back, http://benchw.sourceforge.net, or 
locate anything done by independent testing groups) it appears that under 
real-world load, Postgres trounces MySQL handily and can handle FAR more 
concurrent connections than even a tuned-out MySQL server can handle.  Yes, 
Postgres needs some tuning out of the box, this has been hashed over 
repeatedly and nobody's denying it.  Yes, MySQL is fast for the simplest 
queries and inserts.  And my personal favourite, Yes, MySQL will take 
artistic license with your data.  These are all facts that everyone (MySQL AG 
included) but you seems to be able to agree upon.  The only benchmarks you'll 
speak of are those found with mysql-bench, but those results are generally 
held as a practical joke with zero relevance in real-world applications.

Your comment on licensing is also interesting.  I wonder, do you also have 
problems with Apache because it too is released under a BSD license?  How 
about the BSD Unixes themselves?  How is BSD less good than GPL?  Honestly 
I'd love to know!

 Hey, it's your choice. Do you want to eat American Grade A American beef
 or that strange meat flavored tofu? As long as it meets your needs,
 choose whatever you have the ability to handle.

Exactly my point.  This is *exactly* why I run PostgreSQL over MySQL.  

At any rate I've participated in this offtopic thread enough.  Unless you post 
some practical examples to back up your points I will let you have the last 
word.  The list archives will no doubt commemorate this particular 
thread.  :-)

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Problem with TE405P and Slackware 10.0

2005-03-16 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On March 16, 2005 05:57 am, pixer wrote:
 I have following your advice and I have put this into /etc/lilo.conf
 append = pci=noacpi

  20:  0   IO-APIC-level  t4xxp

 modules (COM port, serial ports, etc), and shuffling the card around to a
 different PCI slot, but unfortunately he does yet not work equally :/

Can you put this card in a totally separate machine with your slackware HDD 
just to see if it comes up properly in another machine?  This is very 
unusual.

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] where is STUN implemented?

2005-03-16 Thread Shailabh Shubhisham
Hi All,
I have been using kphone for quite some time and it
has been nice to me.I however wanted to know where (in
which files) and how is the STUN implemented in
kphone.
 
I am also trying to write my own software for a
softphone.Can anyone please giude me on how to
implement STUN in that taking inspiration from the
STUN implementation of linphone?

Shailabh.

La mejor manera de perder alguien deberá ser sentado luego a ellos instruido 
que usted no los puede tener. 



__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] AGI kill

2005-03-16 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 11:20 +0100, Pepe Aracil wrote:
 Hello.
 
 When the caller hangup  the phone, asterisk kills my AGI python script 
 without 
 notification.
 I caught all signals, but none was trigered.
 How can i trap this event to resume some operations.

Asterisk doesn't send any signal upon hangup. Asterisk closes the pipes
that show up as STDIN and STDOUT for your AGI app. You need to deal with
it gracefully.
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Problem with TE405P and Slackware 10.0 (reply this)

2005-03-16 Thread pixer
On March 16, 2005 05:57 am, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:

 Can you put this card in a totally separate machine with your slackware
HDD 
 just to see if it comes up properly in another machine?  This is very 
 unusual.

 -A 

Unfortunately I have already also tried this, without results.

I do not know what to do any more..



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Basical question to asterisk

2005-03-16 Thread Christian Schoepplein
Hello!

I'm new to asterisk and because I try to configure the package for my 
needs the last days without success, I'd like to ask a basical qestion.

I need asterisk to work together with the German VoIP provider sipgate 
(http://www.sipgate.de). Asterisk should act as a softphone, I want to 
recive and make calls only with the software under linux, no softphone 
should be used. Is this possible with asterisk in principle or do I have 
to use a real softphone together with asterisk?

Manny thanks!

-- 
Gruss / Regards,
Christian Schoepplein chris at schoeppi.net

Linux for the blind: http://www.blinux.suse.de
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call Center software opensource or commercial

2005-03-16 Thread Rich Adamson
  im my case im looking into 100 seats initially and going up to 1000 at
  the end (over a 18 months period).
  Looks like we will have to develop *a lot* if we want to use * for it.
  Maybe a commercial solution will be better at this time.
 
 On Cebit SGI announced a server solution based on Signate software
 (which is based on Asterisk) that can handle up to 5000 simultaneous
 calls. I don't know how the marketing drones have cooked up that number
 but perhaps it's interesting. See 
 http://www.sgi.com/company_info/newsroom/press_releases/2005/march/von.html

According to the marketing blurb, The benchmark was a standard SIPP test 
and was performed by SGI and Signate. The results compared similarly 
configured systems: an Altix 350 with dual Intel® 1.5GHz Itanium 2 
processors/400MHz front side bus/2GB memory compared to a dual 3.0GHz 
Pentium 4 processors/800MHz front side bus/2GB memory. The results 
based on simultaneous calls terminating with comparable voice quality
were 5,002 for the Altix 350 versus 333 for the PC.

Its interesting how marketing people leave out the details. The 
statement only addresses terminating calls (which one is left with the
assumption the test only addressed call setup, not teardown, cdr, etc), 
doesn't mention whether any of those calls could actually carry on a 
conversation, hints that no other application (eg, voicemail) was
in use simultanously, and most likely assumes the equivalent of 
canreinvite=yes on a local lan segment following call setup.

However, the stats do seem to support what many of us have already 
experienced, and that is the pci bus limitations with some Intel 
chipsets is far less then reasonable for realtime apps (such as *).

It would be very interesting to see some real life stats with a 
reasonable mix of * apps including voicemail, transcoding, T1s, etc.

If the box could actually sustain 5,000 real life simultanous calls,
it could replace a hugh percentage of the US class-5 Central Offices
(not to mention PBXs). ;)


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Flashpannel: How to get more than 28 buttons?

2005-03-16 Thread Nicolás Gudiño
Hi Ronald,

 I have setup flash pannel, ... looks nice, but so far I could not
 configure it to get more than 4x7 buttons.
 I tried to make the buttons smaller, but than just the entire picture is
 smaller.

What did you change in op_style.cfg? You can have literally hundred of
buttons per screen, or multiple 'context' to split your buttons into
several screens. I wll send you an alternate op_style.cfg with smaller
buttons offlist. Regards,

-- 
Nicolás Gudiño
Buenos Aires - Argentina
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] CLI SIP Client

2005-03-16 Thread Klaus Peras
Hey there,
does anybody know a CLI SIP Client für Linux?
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
With kind regards
Klaus Peras
Support Networks/Networkmanagement
HOB GmbH  Co KG
Schwadermühlstrasse 3
D-90556 Cadolzburg
Tel:   0 9103 - 715 -329
Fax:   0 9103 - 715 -299
Mobil: 0 175 63 78 911
URLs:  http://www.hob.de   http://www.hob.de/produkte/netz/netz.htm

begin:vcard
fn:Klaus Peras
n:Peras;Klaus
org:HOB;Netzwerk Support
adr;quoted-printable:;;Schwaderm=C3=BChlstrasse 3;Cadolzburg;Bayern;90556;Germany
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:09103 / 715 - 329
url:http://www.hob.de
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] meetme2 compilation

2005-03-16 Thread Dmitry Melekhov
Hello!
Do somebody knows how to compile meetme2 with 1.0.6.
I readed wiki, applied patches, but no luck ;-(
Me be someone can give me working meetme2.c ?
:-)
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: chan_oh323.c ast_oh323_new Internal channel initialization failed

2005-03-16 Thread Michael Manousos
Hi Kamran,
Kamran Ahmad wrote:
hello
i was searching for solution to problem (sip-h.323).
any one from this list asterisk mailing have any idea
how to fix it.
i am getting error when i try to call from sip to
h.323 user
i am successfully registering my asterisk box with
gnugk. but when i try to call to h.323 openphone on
working on GnuGatekeeper, asterisk is not routing it
to GnuGk. i am getting the following error. do you
have any idea. please help i am stuck here for a week.
i am unable to find anything on google on this topic.
Two things:
-- Executing Dial(SIP/2000-ae3f,
OH323/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1720) in new stack
Since Asterisk has registered in gnugk you must not dial
user@host, just user. It will find the user at the gatekeeper.

Mar 16 16:14:46 ERROR[16176]: chan_oh323.c:2501
ast_oh323_new: Internal channel initialization failed.
Bad binary?
This is bad! Usually this happens when you uncomment flags
in asterisk-oh323 Makefile while Asterisk compiled without these
flags (or vice versa). So make sure that you didn't do something
like that.
Michael.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Calls from web interface

2005-03-16 Thread Chris Blake
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 12:15, Chris Blake wrote:
 Greetings *`s,
 
 There was a thread some time back about making calls via * from a web
 interface...ie user clicks number on web page and call is made...
 
 I`ve googled with a few words, checked the wiki, and tried to scan
 through the archives, but no joy...

Ha, should have been looking for .call files.got it now..thanks all
who responded  :)

--
Chris Blake 
Cell: 082 775 1492
Work: +27 11 782 0840
Fax : +27 11 782 0841
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Never trust a child farther than you can throw it.


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Error in placing call file in directory

2005-03-16 Thread Chris Blake
Greetings *`s,

I have created a call file and am manually placing it in
/var/spool/asterisk/outgoing, but I get the following errors in the log
file :

===
Mar 16 15:26:57 DEBUG[2054]: Auto destroying call
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Mar 16 15:27:43 WARNING[2054]: Unable to open
/var/spool/asterisk/outgoing/chris.call: Permission denied, deleting
Mar 16 15:27:43 WARNING[2054]: Failed to scan service
'/var/spool/asterisk/outgoing/chris.call'
===

I have checked permissionss on the file and those appear ok :
-rwxrwxrwx1 root asterisk 1311 Mar 16 15:27 chris.call

If anyone can help I`ll send the call file to you, or is it ok to
clutter the list with it ?

I used the sample file given by asterisk, and have also checked out the
examples on http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+auto-dial+out

Regards

--
Chris Blake 
Cell: 082 775 1492
Work: +27 11 782 0840
Fax : +27 11 782 0841
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If a putt passes over the hole without dropping, it is deemed to have
dropped. The law of gravity holds that any object attempting to maintain
a position in the atmosphere without something to support it must drop.
The law of gravity supercedes the law of golf. -- Donald A. Metz


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Flashpannel: How to get more than 28 buttons?

2005-03-16 Thread Robert Rozman
Hi,
I'd also like to see alternative op_style.cfg. Can we establish some place 
to share them ? I've also one with smaller buttons (but will have to count 
them :-) ...

Regards,
Rob.
- Original Message - 
From: Nicolás Gudiño [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Flashpannel: How to get more than 28 buttons?

Hi Ronald,
I have setup flash pannel, ... looks nice, but so far I could not
configure it to get more than 4x7 buttons.
I tried to make the buttons smaller, but than just the entire picture is
smaller.
What did you change in op_style.cfg? You can have literally hundred of
buttons per screen, or multiple 'context' to split your buttons into
several screens. I wll send you an alternate op_style.cfg with smaller
buttons offlist. Regards,
--
Nicolás Gudiño
Buenos Aires - Argentina
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime config

2005-03-16 Thread Matt Schulte
I got the CVS head to compile finally, and yes I ditched odbc. noob or
not, it's a pain in the a$$ if you mess up the install. All in all,
mysql seems to work fine. Thanks.

Matt

-Original Message-
From: Joe Dennick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 1:20 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime config


Have you considered using the mysql method instead of the odbc method.
I'm using it and it works just fine.  Here's a sample of my
extconfig.conf:
   extensions = mysql,ast-conf,extension
   sipfriends = mysql,ast-conf,sip_buddi
   voicemail = mysql,ast-conf,voicemail

You also need to add the floowing to your res_mysql.conf file:
   [general]
   dbhost = 192.168.1.7
   dbname = ast-conf
   dbuser = dbusername
   dbpass = blah
   dbport = 3306
   dbsock = /tmp/mysql.sock

The only two things I have found that doesn't work is a) the mailbox
entry for a SIP user doesn't actually light up the MWI (Message Waiting
Indicator); and
b) voicemail passwords cannot begin with a '0' (zero) because its a
numeric field.

Matt Schulte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

 Having problems getting realtime working, I'm trying to use odbc for 
 all of this. I've got Fedora 3 and have been fighting with odbc for a 
 day now. I think I got it working correctly, however I can't seem to 
 get the realtime portion working. In asterisk 'odbc show' shows it 
 connected, I see it on my (odbc) mysql server connected and all, it 
 connects and just idles. So, without saying too much more here's the 
 configs:

 odbcinst.ini

 [mysql]
 Description = ODBC for MySQL
 Driver  = /usr/lib/libmyodbc3.so
 Setup   = /usr/lib/libodbcmyS.so
 FileUsage   = 1

 odbc.ini
 ---
 Description = Asterisk MySQL Connection
 Trace = off
 TraceFile = stderr
 Driver = mysql
 Server = blah.blah
 User = blah
 Password = blah
 port = 3306
 database = asterisk

 extconfig.conf

 iaxfriends = odbc,asterisk,sip_users
 sipfriends = odbc,asterisk,sip_users
 sipusers = odbc,asterisk,sip_users
 sippeers = odbc,asterisk,sip_users


 [asterisk]
 dsn = asterisk
 username = dffjdg
 password = blajh
 pre-connect = yes


 Ok, now that's out of the way. In my debug log it shows -nothing-, 
 besides what I can see in the console. It shows no queries or 
 anything, driving me nuts. I'm running asterisk 1.0.6, as head won't 
 seem to compile (as of this this email)..

 I'm trying to test realtime via simply SIP REGISTER:

 Mar 15 13:40:39 NOTICE[7905]: chan_iax2.c:3910 register_verify: No 
 registration for peer 'brak-test' (from blah blah) Mar 15 13:40:39 
 NOTICE[7906]: chan_sip.c:7681 handle_request: Registration from 
 'sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for 'blah' 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com 
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-- 
Joe Dennick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Best DB

2005-03-16 Thread Mohit Muthanna
  Data validation should be done at all levels.  Period.
 
 Validating the SAME data at each level greatly decreases your speed.

True, but at the expense of data reliability and security. If one
validation layer is compromised (buffer overflow, packet injection, or
even a bad link between client and server), the other will catch it.
See my previous post.

Infact, many coding standards and certifications call for strict
validation at all levels.

Never _ever_ sacrifice security for performance. Big mistake.

 It is much simpler and easier to just validate it first.

Disagree. If you were to validate it only in one layer, it would have
to be last (i.e., closest to the server). Think of a website doing
javascript validation of credit card information. One can easily
override the validation my simply modifying the HTTP requests (or
maybe even disabling javascript).

Anyhow, this is getting way off topic. A thousand apologies.

-- 
Mohit Muthanna [mohit (at) muthanna (uhuh) com]
There are 10 types of people. Those who understand binary, and those
who don't.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with presence

2005-03-16 Thread somesh s
Hi,

Someone observed the problem with presence in
asterisk?
Please do reply.

With regards
Somesh S. Shanbhag

--- somesh s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I am again running with presence problem in
 asterisk.
 I have two windows messengers registered
 successfully 
 with asterisk (Example msn1  msn2).
 
 When msn1 adds msn2 in contacts it shows online. Its
 
 fine. But when msn2 un-registers still msn1 displays
 
 msn2 as online (but it MUST be offline).
 
 Anyone observed this problem? What is the reason?
 
 With regards
 Somesh S. Shanbhag
 
 
   
 __ 
 Do you Yahoo!? 
 Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
 http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

---
SIMPLICITY IS THE BEAUTY.
BE NATURAL LIVE NATURAL.
---
Somesh S. Shanbhag
Mascon Global Communication Technologies
Enterprise of Mascon Global Limited
#59/2, 100Ft Ring Road
Banashankari II stage
Bangalore-560070
Karnataka
INDIA
Website: http://www.masconit.com
---



__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Best DB

2005-03-16 Thread Jason Stewart
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 13:00 -0500, Giudice, Salvatore wrote:
 MySQL: Speed, Power and Precision
 _

Speed, yes. Anyone can write an SQL layer over a flat file and make it
fast. If you want real speed (faster than MySQL with the same level of
reliability choose SQLite.

Power - I agree here too. There are lots of great tools for MySQL due to
it's ubiquity.

Precision - No Way! see-
http://sql-info.de/mysql/gotchas.html


 MySQL is free. It can be installed in less than 59 minutes from source
 for light use by a first time user AND there is no need for extravagant
 tuning. 
 and if you are particularly keen on undertaking
 elaborate tuning projects to squeeze every last drop of life from a
 database, you can even write your own database engine for MySQL. 

So a beginner user can install MySQL in less than an hour from source
with no need for tuning, but if they feel the need to tune their
database other than what's out of the box a newbie can write their own
database engine? I'd much rather mess with a few config options that
write a database engine.

For the record PgSQL can be installed in the same amount of time as
MySQL. For the extreme noob who knows nothing about databases and is
still learning then tuning will not be a factor. For anyone else the
first thing that they'll do is look at the manual for the tuning
section. It's not rocket science.


 If you are so keen on paying for something, try buying support - MySQL
 AB. With PostgreSQL, you could get support from a mom and pop shop...
 However, either way you will save tons of money over Oracle.

You could also get enterprise level support through Pervasive, a company
much larger and older than MySQL AB.

http://crn.com/sections/breakingnews/breakingnews.jhtml?articleId=57700307


 
 For benchmark information comparing MySQl with several DB's on various
 OS's (yes Oracle and PostgreSQL are included) see the following link:
 
 http://ftp.iranscience.net/pub/databases/mysql/information/benchmarks.ht
 ml

Hmm... More benchmarks, eh? I've see benchmarks swing both ways with
MySQL being faster and others with PGSQL being faster. In my experience
Postgres has handled our multi-gigabyte database much more smoothly than
MySQL. Larger, complex queries seem to return much more quickly with
Postgres. 

My mantra is pick the right tool for the job. For smaller webapps I
use MySQL. For huge enterprise databases I use PostgreSQL.


Regards,
-- 
Jason Stewart  | Tel: 616-532-2300
Systems Administrator/ | Fax: 616-532-3461
Programmer | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Right to Life of Michigan  | Web: http://www.rtl.org

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Two (or more) Asterisk servers, routing calls

2005-03-16 Thread Giorgio Mandolfo
Hi everyone,
since I finished some hardware issues, now the real * configuration started.
It is my first attempt to get asterisk working and I am a bit confused.
The structure I am going to configure is quite easy:
The asterisk server is connected to a traditional PBX via S0.
When a user dial asterisk internal number followed by one of specific 
phone number (i.e. remote branch offices, so user dial 120 12345 (which 
120 is asterisk local number and 12345 is the remote number to call), 
asterisk should understand that 12345 is another asterisk remote server 
and redirect the call to the remote server IP address. That remote 
asterisk server must accept the call and divert it to a another 
traditional PBX and then make the analog phone ring.

in summary: Phone - Analog PBX - Asterisk - INTERNET - Asterisk - 
PBX - Phone *

Who can give me some hints and advices to get this done?
I already read alot, not enogh surely. But since I am too much confused, 
I need some clear and surely right help.
This because I am not sure which way take.

For example:
SIP or IAX?
Should I use 'register =' in sip.conf for both server, one looking for 
the other?
In which config file I tell * to forward to the PBX?

Thanks in advance for your help and patience.
Giorgio

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] meetme2 compilation

2005-03-16 Thread Dan Austin
What errors are you getting? 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dmitry
Melekhov
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 4:36 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] meetme2 compilation

Hello!

Do somebody knows how to compile meetme2 with 1.0.6.
I readed wiki, applied patches, but no luck ;-(
Me be someone can give me working meetme2.c ?
:-)


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk makes the news

2005-03-16 Thread Doug Lytle
An article posted on the The Register:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/03/16/asterisk_open_source_pbx/
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk@Home Install Problem

2005-03-16 Thread Scheda
Haha, yeah, plenty of hair left. I'm a youngin. Only 19. But that's
beside the point. If I had another box I could dedicate to asterisk, I
would do that without hesitation. Right now I just installed the new
Win32 version onto my dual booting XP/Debian laptop to play around and
get that set up as a temp * server. So I'll set this all up then I'll
fix whatever is up with the other one. I have another spare cd drive
laying around, so I'll try that. Thus far I didn't pay a penny for the
box I'm using. I'm using spare parts and stuff people gave me. It's a
1.3 ghz, 20 Gb hdd, 512 mb ram, so I KNOW I have enough spare room in
there...

Oh, and about the space issue, just to make sure I had enough room, I
installed a full install of Slackware last night. 3 Gb after all the
packages, so I know I have the room.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Basical question to asterisk

2005-03-16 Thread Bruno Hertz
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 13:13 +0100, Christian Schoepplein wrote:

 Hello!
 
 I'm new to asterisk and because I try to configure the package for my 
 needs the last days without success, I'd like to ask a basical qestion.
 
 I need asterisk to work together with the German VoIP provider sipgate 
 (http://www.sipgate.de). Asterisk should act as a softphone, I want to 
 recive and make calls only with the software under linux, no softphone 
 should be used. Is this possible with asterisk in principle or do I have 
 to use a real softphone together with asterisk?
 
 Manny thanks!
 

You can use asterisk as a softphone with either chan_oss or chan_alsa.
Googling for 'asterisk' and 'softphone' gives this link at 7th position
http://www.junghanns.net/asterisk/page13.html
It's slightly outdated, you won't need the diff any more (as far as I
can tell), but it still gives you the general idea.

*'s softphone capabilities are somehow limited though. E.g. you can't
put calls on hold, and what bothers me even more is that the
soundcard isn't released between calls. I.e. * grabs it on startup and
releases it only when quitting, unlike (most) other softphones.

On the other hand, latency wise * is the best softphone I came across
on Linux.

Regards, Bruno.



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Error in placing call file in directory

2005-03-16 Thread Razza
Chris Blake wrote :

-%-
If anyone can help I`ll send the call file to you, or is it ok to
clutter the list with it ?
-%-

'Clutter' the list I'd be interested and at least it is pertinent to *
;o)

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] problem with musiconhold

2005-03-16 Thread Gianluca Colucci
Hi everybody,

I'm receiving the message res_musiconhold.c:309 monmp3thread:
Request to schedule in the past?!?! in asterisk console when I try to
put a call on hold. 
I don't the reason and I'm sure the relative module is loaded.
In musiconhold.conf I put these lines, trying something I found in some
previous post:

;
; Music on hold class definitions
;
[classes]
[moh_files]
default = /var/lib/asterisk/mohmp3

and I added this in sip.conf:

musiconhold=default

The directory I specified contains the three standard files but all this
doesn't work when I try to put a call on hold.

Does anyone have some idea about?

Thanks in advance,
Gianluca Colucci

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Error in placing call file in directory

2005-03-16 Thread Stefan Reuter
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 14:20 +, Razza wrote:
 Chris Blake wrote :
 
 -%-
 If anyone can help I`ll send the call file to you, or is it ok to
 clutter the list with it ?
 -%-
 
 'Clutter' the list I'd be interested and at least it is pertinent to *
 ;o)

I am almost sure it has nothing to do with the file contents.
The warning Unable to open %s: %s, deleting is only generated at one
place in pbx/pbx_spool.c:

f = fopen(fn, r+);
if (f) {
...
} else {
  ...
  ast_log(LOG_WARNING, Unable to open %s: %s, deleting\n, fn,
strerror(errno));
  ...
}

So please double check that the user running asterisk has access to the
file. Just checking the file is not sufficent, also check the directory
permissions above.

=Stefan

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime does not work yet, ...

2005-03-16 Thread Matthew Boehm
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:

 vpbx*CLI realtime update sippeers allow g729 name 621
 Failed to update. Check the debug log for possible SQL related

That is the wrong format of the command. Notice the incorrect SQL that
was queried? Type realtime update by itself to see an example.

 That is a joke ;-)   Everything is fine and updated 0 rows!!!

No it isn't a joke. The Everything is fine. statment refers to the
connection and the successful SQL execution. Even if nothing is updated,
that doesn't mean the SQL didn't execute.

 [mysql1]
 dsn = astconf
 username = root
 password = MyPassword
 pre-connect = yes

You are not using the ODBC drivers. You can remove that [mysql1] stuff
from your res_mysql.conf

-Matthew

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Flashpannel: How to get more than 28 buttons?

2005-03-16 Thread Joel Vandal
Hi,
I also wrote a PHP scripts that generate op_style.cfg. You specify how many 
rows x cols and the icons/buttons/text alignment are properly scaled.

(i.e. you defined a 5 x 20 for 100 buttons, button height will be small so 
Line, CallerID, Timer position will be adjusted)

Script not 100% finish but will be available soon...
--
Joel Vandal
- Original Message - 
From: Robert Rozman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nicolás Gudiño [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - 
Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Flashpannel: How to get more than 28 buttons?

Hi,
I'd also like to see alternative op_style.cfg. Can we establish some place
to share them ? I've also one with smaller buttons (but will have to count
them :-) ...
Regards,
Rob.
- Original Message - 
From: Nicolás Gudiño [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Flashpannel: How to get more than 28 buttons?

Hi Ronald,
I have setup flash pannel, ... looks nice, but so far I could not
configure it to get more than 4x7 buttons.
I tried to make the buttons smaller, but than just the entire picture is
smaller.
What did you change in op_style.cfg? You can have literally hundred of
buttons per screen, or multiple 'context' to split your buttons into
several screens. I wll send you an alternate op_style.cfg with smaller
buttons offlist. Regards,
--
Nicolás Gudiño
Buenos Aires - Argentina
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Flashpannel: How to get more than 28 buttons?

2005-03-16 Thread Ivan Meic (Vox Mundi)
Nicolas,

 I have setup flash pannel, ... looks nice, but so far I could not
 configure it to get more than 4x7 buttons.
 I tried to make the buttons smaller, but than just the entire picture is
 smaller.

What did you change in op_style.cfg? You can have literally hundred of
buttons per screen, or multiple 'context' to split your buttons into
several screens. I wll send you an alternate op_style.cfg with smaller
buttons offlist. Regards,

Can you by any chance post a sample configs for multiple contexts ?
I couldn't make it work so far.
LED's on buttons in any other context than default would just flash red and
green ...

Thanks,
Ivan

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime does not work yet, ... *bug*

2005-03-16 Thread Matthew Boehm
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:25:17PM +0800, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
 Mar 16 15:13:45 DEBUG[29502]: Raw Hangup 69.73.19.178:4569, src=14,
 dst=1259 Mar 16 15:13:45 DEBUG[29502]: MySQL RealTime: Update SQL:
 UPDATE sip_buddies SET name = '621' WHERE allow = 'g729'
 Mar 16 15:13:45 DEBUG[29502]: MySQL RealTime: Everything is fine.
 Mar 16 15:13:45 DEBUG[29502]: MySQL RealTime: Updated 0 rows on
 table: sip_buddies

 *ALARM* Where is that query fron? It's totally wrong! It just changed
 the name of anyone who is allowed to use g729.

 Looks like Realtime is not quite there yet for production...

 Have a nice day,

OK. I've been patient and kind up until now. Here comes the rudeness:
Martijn, shut up! This is now the 3rd time you have stated that Realtime is
not ready for production using baseless acquisations.

The SQL query that was executed above is EXACTLY CORRECT!!

What 'you' failed to realize is that the original poster (Mr. Wiplinger)
typed the realtime update command incorrectly.

Because of your ignorance in what really happened and your lack of research
into ARA and ARA'a CLI syntax, you have made yourself look incredibly
stupid.

rudeness off/

My apologies to everyone else on the list. ARA is a core feature, not an
addon. (The MySQL driver is.)
Despite Mr. Oosterhout's claims, it is a very nice, usefull and STABLE tool.

-Matthew

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Basical question to asterisk

2005-03-16 Thread Jay Milk
I have * running with sipgate.de so that works fine.  However, if all
you want is to use * as a softphone, you'd be better off using an actual
softphone -- * would be overkill for that, and it still wouldn't be as
easy to use as a proper softphone.

 -Original Message-
 From: Christian Schoepplein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 6:14 AM
 To: Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Basical question to asterisk
 
 
 Hello!
 
 I'm new to asterisk and because I try to configure the package for my 
 needs the last days without success, I'd like to ask a 
 basical qestion.
 
 I need asterisk to work together with the German VoIP 
 provider sipgate 
 (http://www.sipgate.de). Asterisk should act as a softphone, 
 I want to 
 recive and make calls only with the software under linux, no 
 softphone 
 should be used. Is this possible with asterisk in principle 
 or do I have 
 to use a real softphone together with asterisk?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Setting up Security Groups

2005-03-16 Thread PA
Thanks Steven, that was really a simple solution I overlooked.  I added 
appropriate context=siphones-superuser in the user settings in sip.conf, 
commented out the includes under default and all inbound/outbound security 
accounts are routed as I intended.  

You were right, even unregistered SIP phones were able to dial out.  I think I 
see a more clearly how default context is used.

Phil Avery



-Original Message-
From: Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mar 15, 2005 11:06 AM
To: PA [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Setting up Security Groups

On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 07:21 -0800, PA wrote:
 Right now here is how I have it structured in extensions.conf.  What
 am I missing?  Why would a sip-basic member be able to make toll
 calls?
 
 [default]
 include = sip-basic
 include = sip-operator
 include = sip-superuser

You probably want to remove those 3 entries. I can't remember for sure
if you can inherit includes, but I do remember that unregistered sip
phones could have access to the default context. 

Guessing without the benefit of the logs from your machine, your phones
may be entering the default context and getting access that they don't
deserve.

 [sip-superuser]
 include = outbound-local
 include = outbound-longdistance
 include = outbound-tollfree
 include = outbound-toll
 --- sip users info follows here
 
 [sip-operator]
 include = outbound-local
 include = outbound-longdistance
 include = outbound-tollfree
 --- sip users info follows here
 
 [sip-basic]
 include = outbound-local
 include = outbound-tollfree
 --- sip users info follows here
 
 [outbound-local]
 --- outbound calling info follows here
 
 [outbound-longdistance]
 --- outbound calling info follows here
 
 [outbound-tollfree]
 --- outbound calling info follows here
 
 [outbound-toll]
 --- outbound calling info follows here

Without the details of these outbound sections, we can't tell if you
have a pattern matching problem that is causing your troubles.
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Spam detection software, running on the system zeus.avanzada7.com, has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview:  On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 07:21 -0800, PA wrote:  Right 
  now here is how I have it structured in extensions.conf. What  am I 
  missing? Why would a sip-basic member be able to make toll  calls?  
   [default]  include = sip-basic  include = sip-operator  include 
  = sip-superuser [...] 

Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name  description
 -- --
 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO   Received: contains a forged HELO


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] problem with musiconhold

2005-03-16 Thread Wiley Siler
Gianluca,

Did you install the .59r. Version of mpg123?  The most common problem I
have seen for this is that people keep installing the 59q or 59g version
of mpg123.  59r is the way to go.

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-mpg123

Thanks,
Wiley


 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gianluca
Colucci
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 7:27 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] problem with musiconhold

Hi everybody,

I'm receiving the message res_musiconhold.c:309 monmp3thread:
Request to schedule in the past?!?! in asterisk console when I try to
put a call on hold. 
I don't the reason and I'm sure the relative module is loaded.
In musiconhold.conf I put these lines, trying something I found in some
previous post:

;
; Music on hold class definitions
;
[classes]
[moh_files]
default = /var/lib/asterisk/mohmp3

and I added this in sip.conf:

musiconhold=default

The directory I specified contains the three standard files but all this
doesn't work when I try to put a call on hold.

Does anyone have some idea about?

Thanks in advance,
Gianluca Colucci

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Best DB

2005-03-16 Thread David Brodbeck
This Postgres vs. MySQL business is ultimately just a religious debate, like
PC vs. Mac, Ford vs. Chevy, or Kirk vs. Picard.  They both work; they both
have their plusses and minuses; and debates about which are better never
convince anyone to change their preconceived ideas.  It's also about as
on-topic for this list as any of the other subjects I just mentioned.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime does not work yet, ...

2005-03-16 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
Matthew Boehm wrote:
Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
 

 

[mysql1]
dsn = astconf
username = root
password = MyPassword
pre-connect = yes
   

   You are not using the ODBC drivers. You can remove that [mysql1] stuff
from your res_mysql.conf
 

Removed, but still no codecs
br
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime does not work yet, ...

2005-03-16 Thread Matthew Boehm
*CLI Urgent handler
-- SIP Seeding peers from Astdb: '3044' at [EMAIL PROTECTED]:64718 for
120
Urgent handler
-- Registered SIP '3044' at 64.XX.XX.XX port 17524 expires 120

Codecs   : 0x10c (ulaw|alaw|g729)
Codec Order  : (g729|ulaw|alaw)

Using the following table:

CREATE TABLE customer_stations (
  name varchar(30) NOT NULL default '',
  callgroup varchar(30) default NULL,
  callerid varchar(50) default NULL,
  restrictcid char(3) default 'NO',
  canreinvite char(1) default NULL,
  context varchar(30) default NULL,
  dtmfmode varchar(7) default NULL,
  host varchar(31) NOT NULL default 'dynamic',
  mailbox varchar(50) default NULL,
  md5secret varchar(32) default NULL,
  nat varchar(5) default NULL,
  pickupgroup varchar(10) default NULL,
  port varchar(5) NOT NULL default '0',
  qualify varchar(4) default NULL,
  secret varchar(30) default NULL,
  `type` varchar(6) NOT NULL default 'friend',
  username varchar(30) default NULL,
  disallow varchar(100) default NULL,
  allow varchar(100) default NULL,
  regseconds int(11) NOT NULL default '0',
  ipaddr varchar(15) NOT NULL default '0.0.0.0',
  PRIMARY KEY  (station_id),
  KEY name (name)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;

And this entry:

INSERT INTO `customer_stations` (`name`, `callgroup`, `callerid`,
`restrictcid`, `canreinvite`, `context`, `dtmfmode`, `host`, `mailbox`,
`md5secret`, `nat`, `pickupgroup`, `port`, `qualify`, `secret`, `type`,
`username`, `disallow`, `allow`, `regseconds`, `ipaddr`) VALUES ('3044',
NULL, NULL, 'NO', NULL, 'cytel-internal', NULL, 'dynamic', '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
'd2756499745e254f52a224713f1a7d91', 'no', NULL, '5060', NULL, NULL,
'friend', '3044', NULL, 'g729,ulaw,alaw', 1109176184, '10.0.0.36');

Run this command from MySQL CLI: show create table sipusers\G.  -- 
exactly like that
If the allow column is 'above' the disallow column, then that is
probably your problem.

ARA works by returning all columns in a table (SELECT *). So your column
order is most important. If the allow column comes before disallow in the
table schema, then the allow stuff will be processed by chan_sip and THEN
the disallow will be processed.

You need to make sure that disallow is processed first.

Let me know..

-Matthew

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] ANNOUNCEMENT: Updates for app_cbmysql andMeetMe2gui (out of tree modules)

2005-03-16 Thread Henry Devito
Dan,  Thanks for the time helping me out.  I figured everything out except 
for the patch.
7.  cd to asterisk/apps and run patch -p0 
path-to/apps-meetme-cbmysql.txt
When I do this step it errors out and asks for the file to patch..  When I 
look at the apps-meetme-cbmysql.txt It shows the file name to be 
app_cbmysql.c so I changed the name of the file cbmysql.c to app_cbmysql.c 
but it still doesn't work.

Also in the apps-meetme-cbmysql.txt it shows the path to be 
asterisk-1.0.5-orig I am trying to install this on [EMAIL PROTECTED]  So the 
source is in /var/build_aah/asterisk_src/asterisk.  Maybe I'm looking in the 
wrong direction. any help would be appreciated.  I can even give you root 
access to my box.  When all is said and done I will write up a wiki page for 
installation. 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Problem starting Asterisk - libssl.so.4 cannot be found

2005-03-16 Thread Andy and Jayne Slim
I'm sure this is a pretty basic problem, unfortunately I am a telecomms rather 
than a Linux person so any suggestions would be most appreciated.  I have 
successfully downloaded and installed the various Asterisk packages.  
However, when I try to start Asterisk, I immediately get a message saying 
module 'libssl.so.4' cannot be found and the startup is halted.  I don't have 
this file anywhere on my system but I read on some articles that this was a 
symbolic link to libssl.so.0.9 so I did an 'ln -s' to point the offending 
module there.  This made no difference.  I therefore upgraded my Open SSL 
version to 0.9.7d and then re-installed Asterisk.  Still no joy.  I have 
moved the module and its symbolic link to the same folder as the Asterisk 
executable, and checked the path statements in ld.conf, but the program still 
will not start.  Please can someone advise me on what else I should try to 
resolve this?

Many thanks for your help

Andy
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Voicemail Problems

2005-03-16 Thread David Choo
Dear All,

I've setup got a Asterisk and pgSQL combi that works fine. I'm about to
perform the migration deployment when I noticed a issue which I need some
expert advise here.

When user connect to Voicemail, the CPU Load of the machine will shoot up
to around 50 - 60%, and its causing sound distortion, and not to mention
serious discomfort during my demo. Call to unavailable users will yield the
same result, calls to busy users will yield the same result too.

However, PSTN / IP calls all work smoothly. Similary, my IVR works
perfectly.

I've tried adding, and subsequently removing the following sample lines to
no effect.

exten = s,1,answer()

I might have missed something out, and I don't have much time left. Would
appreciate any help. I'm forwarding only part of the extensions.conf here
as I don't want to jam up the mail, but if anyone requires, please buzz me
and I'll forward you the entire file! Cheers!

= Start
===

exten = a,1,VoicemailMain(${MACRO_EXTEN})
exten = a,n,Hangup()

exten = s,1,NoOp(${ARG1})
exten = s,n,NoOp(${ARG2})
exten = s,n,NoOp(${ARG3})
exten = s,n,NoOp(${ARG4})
exten = s,n,NoOp(${ARG5})
exten = s,n,NoOp(${ARG6})

;exten = s,n,GotoIf($[${CALLERIDNAME} = ]?setName:skipSetName)
;exten = s,n(setName),SetCIDName(${CALLERIDNUM})
exten = s,n,SetCIDName(${CALLERIDNAME})
exten = s,n,SetCIDNum(${CALLERIDNUM})

exten = s,n,GotoIf($[${ARG4} != 0]?${ARG2},${ARG4},1:)
exten = s,n,Dial(SIP/${ARG1}IAX2/${ARG1},${ARG3},,TtWw)
exten = s,n,Goto(s-${DIALSTATUS},1)

exten = s-BUSY,1,GotoIf($[${ARG5} != 0]?${ARG2},${ARG5},1:)
exten = s-BUSY,n,Voicemail(b${MACRO_EXTEN})
exten = s-BUSY,n,Hangup()

exten = s-NOANSWER,1,Answer()
exten = s-NOANSWER,n,Voicemail(u${MACRO_EXTEN})
exten = s-NOANSWER,n,Hangup()

exten = _s-.,1,Goto(s-NOANSWER,1)


=== End
==

Best Regards,

==
David Choo
Systems Engineer
Business  Technology Division
Engineered for Changing Businesses
Espore Corp Pte Ltd
68 Kallang Pudding Rd
#04-03 SYH Logistics Bldg
Singapore 349327
Tel: 65-68487806
Fax : 65-6842 2724
E-mail :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=

Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this message. If
you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy it or use it for any
purpose, nor deliver this message to anyone. Instead, please delete this
message and destroy any other record of it immediately and kindly notify
the sender by return email. Thank you for your co-operation.

Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, arrive late, or contain
viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or
omissions in the context of this message nor can the sender guarantee that
this message is virus free.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem with TE405P and Slackware 10.0 (reply this)

2005-03-16 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On March 16, 2005 07:12 am, pixer wrote:
 Unfortunately I have already also tried this, without results.
 I do not know what to do any more..

Was it an entirely different motherboard (different manufacturer)?  If so, 
it's time to call Digium and open a ticket.  It sounds like the card is DOA.  
They will likely want you to go through all these same steps, but be patient.

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk retains DTMF Control Even whenan External IVR System is dialed

2005-03-16 Thread Jason Williams
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:13:40 -0500, Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 atxfer = *2   ; Attended transfer


Remove attended transfer capability and then you will be able o enter *2XXX

Jason
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] PRI: Call Reference Length not supported

2005-03-16 Thread Matt Fredrickson
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:38:04AM -0600, Matthew Boehm wrote:
 I'm not a PRI expert and therefore don't know what this debug stuff means
 for PRI, so if anyone can help me here...
 I'm running the latest libpri and zaptel from CVS.
 Keep in mind that everything works fine when using the STABLE libpri and
 zaptel.
 I am NOT running CVS asterisk. I am running 1.0.6.

Try running it with unstable Asterisk and see if it still does it.  You should
probably not be mixing unstable libpri with stable Asterisk.  There have been
a lot of changes in libpri that likely could have broken compatiblity at some 
level
with stable Asterisk.

Matthew Fredrickson
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IPSwitchBoard BETA

2005-03-16 Thread Henry Devito
I installed this and it seems to be working great.  Good job.  Just one 
question though,  What is the shared extensions file?

- Original Message - 
From: Thorben Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 5:28 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] IPSwitchBoard BETA


Hi all,
I have just published my last few weeks of hard work: IPSwitchBoard BETA.
Please let me know what you think and post comments on the Wiki.
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-IPSwitchBoard+BETA
Thank you
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] TxFAX problem

2005-03-16 Thread Vladyslav
Hi Ppl.
Once, couple weeks ago when I have updated * from CVS-HEAD something
happen and I could not send a fax anymore.
After that I have tried previous * CVS versions with different versions
of spandsp (0.0.1, 0.0.2pre4, 0.0.2pre10) but without any changes.
I have tried that on Fedora Core 2 with libtiff-3.5.7-16.1 and
libtiff-devel-3.5.7-16.1. Everything compiles smoothly, but when I try
to send a fax it tries to negotiate and than hangup (on fax machine -
incomplete), also tried to send to another fax machine (but result was
the same). 
I get back to spandsp-0.0.1 because that one has at least a bit more
debug output than 0.0.2pre10.
and here what I got:

Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 NSF: 20 00 00 79 00 00 00 82 0f 09 03 10 10 00 02 95 80 9c f8 80 40
01 49 02 41 52 41 59 4f 5a 20 55 4b 52 41 49 4e 45 23 20 03
NSF without final frame tag
The remote is made by 'Panasonic'
 DIS: 80 20 ee 99 84 80 11
DIS with final frame tag
In state 4
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 XCN: fa
XCN with final frame tag
In state 4
Disconnecting
Changed from phase 3 to 7

 Does anyone have a clue what it could be ?


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime does not work yet, ...

2005-03-16 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
Matthew Boehm wrote:
*CLI Urgent handler
   -- SIP Seeding peers from Astdb: '3044' at [EMAIL PROTECTED]:64718 for
120
Urgent handler
   -- Registered SIP '3044' at 64.XX.XX.XX port 17524 expires 120
Codecs   : 0x10c (ulaw|alaw|g729)
Codec Order  : (g729|ulaw|alaw)
Using the following table:
CREATE TABLE customer_stations (
 name varchar(30) NOT NULL default '',
 callgroup varchar(30) default NULL,
 callerid varchar(50) default NULL,
 restrictcid char(3) default 'NO',
 canreinvite char(1) default NULL,
 context varchar(30) default NULL,
 dtmfmode varchar(7) default NULL,
 host varchar(31) NOT NULL default 'dynamic',
 mailbox varchar(50) default NULL,
 md5secret varchar(32) default NULL,
 nat varchar(5) default NULL,
 pickupgroup varchar(10) default NULL,
 port varchar(5) NOT NULL default '0',
 qualify varchar(4) default NULL,
 secret varchar(30) default NULL,
 `type` varchar(6) NOT NULL default 'friend',
 username varchar(30) default NULL,
 disallow varchar(100) default NULL,
 allow varchar(100) default NULL,
 regseconds int(11) NOT NULL default '0',
 ipaddr varchar(15) NOT NULL default '0.0.0.0',
 PRIMARY KEY  (station_id),
 KEY name (name)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
And this entry:
INSERT INTO `customer_stations` (`name`, `callgroup`, `callerid`,
`restrictcid`, `canreinvite`, `context`, `dtmfmode`, `host`, `mailbox`,
`md5secret`, `nat`, `pickupgroup`, `port`, `qualify`, `secret`, `type`,
`username`, `disallow`, `allow`, `regseconds`, `ipaddr`) VALUES ('3044',
NULL, NULL, 'NO', NULL, 'cytel-internal', NULL, 'dynamic', '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
'd2756499745e254f52a224713f1a7d91', 'no', NULL, '5060', NULL, NULL,
'friend', '3044', NULL, 'g729,ulaw,alaw', 1109176184, '10.0.0.36');
Run this command from MySQL CLI: show create table sipusers\G.  -- 
exactly like that
If the allow column is 'above' the disallow column, then that is
probably your problem.

 

I changed the sequence first disallow and than allow. After restarting * 
it is working now!
I am sure I copied the table and did not change it, ... somewhere it 
must have the wrong order.


Thanks for your patient with me!
bye
Ronald
ARA works by returning all columns in a table (SELECT *). So your column
order is most important. If the allow column comes before disallow in the
table schema, then the allow stuff will be processed by chan_sip and THEN
the disallow will be processed.
You need to make sure that disallow is processed first.
Let me know..
-Matthew
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 


--
Ronald Wiplinger  (CEO of ELMIT)
http://www.elmit.com+886 (0) 939--77-55-16  or FWD 511208
- I'm a SpamCon Foundation Member, #694, Verify it at http://www.spamcon.org
PS: Spam prevention!
Our system is protected with a spam prevention program. 
If you send us an e-mail, our system will send you a confirmation message back. Just reply to this confirmation message please. 
After receiving this confirmation message, our system will send the hold message (one) and all future messages (after the received confirmation message) to me without asking you again.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Cisco gateways and hairpinning

2005-03-16 Thread Steve Blair
Hello:
Has anyone on this list had to configure hairpinning on a Cisco
gateway running IOS 12.2 or 12.3 and using a PRI for connectivity
to the PSTN? If so could you tell me how it is done? I'm told this
is the source of my call transfer problems and yet I cannot find
clear instructions for how the configuration is done.
Thanks,Steve
--
 
ISC Network Engineering
The University of Pennsylvania
3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
Philadelphia, PA 19104  

voice: 215-573-8396 

  215-746-8001
fax: 215-898-9348

sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Cisco gateways and hairpinning

2005-03-16 Thread Steve Blair
Hello:
Has anyone on this list had to configure hairpinning on a Cisco
gateway running IOS 12.2 or 12.3 and using a PRI for connectivity
to the PSTN? If so could you tell me how it is done? I'm told this
is the source of my call transfer problems and yet I cannot find
clear instructions for how the configuration is done.
Thanks,Steve
--
 
ISC Network Engineering
The University of Pennsylvania
3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
Philadelphia, PA 19104  

voice: 215-573-8396 

  215-746-8001
fax: 215-898-9348

sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFAX problem

2005-03-16 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi Vladyslav,
Use 0.0.2pre1, but add the line
   fax.verbose = TRUE;
just after
   fax_init(fax, calling_party, NULL);
That will turn on the detailed logging.
Is the listing you posted the entire log? It looks like there should be 
more.

One common mistake people make - Did you use the |caller parameter 
when running txfax?

Regards,
Steve
Vladyslav wrote:
Hi Ppl.
Once, couple weeks ago when I have updated * from CVS-HEAD something
happen and I could not send a fax anymore.
After that I have tried previous * CVS versions with different versions
of spandsp (0.0.1, 0.0.2pre4, 0.0.2pre10) but without any changes.
I have tried that on Fedora Core 2 with libtiff-3.5.7-16.1 and
libtiff-devel-3.5.7-16.1. Everything compiles smoothly, but when I try
to send a fax it tries to negotiate and than hangup (on fax machine -
incomplete), also tried to send to another fax machine (but result was
the same). 
I get back to spandsp-0.0.1 because that one has at least a bit more
debug output than 0.0.2pre10.
and here what I got:

Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 NSF: 20 00 00 79 00 00 00 82 0f 09 03 10 10 00 02 95 80 9c f8 80 40
01 49 02 41 52 41 59 4f 5a 20 55 4b 52 41 49 4e 45 23 20 03
NSF without final frame tag
The remote is made by 'Panasonic'
 DIS: 80 20 ee 99 84 80 11
DIS with final frame tag
In state 4
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 XCN: fa
XCN with final frame tag
In state 4
Disconnecting
Changed from phase 3 to 7
Does anyone have a clue what it could be ?
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco gateways and hairpinning

2005-03-16 Thread Henry Devito
Steve can you post your Cisco configs?  Can you post the configs from your * 
box that pertain to your issue?

- Original Message - 
From: Steve Blair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 9:35 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco gateways and hairpinning


Hello:
Has anyone on this list had to configure hairpinning on a Cisco
gateway running IOS 12.2 or 12.3 and using a PRI for connectivity
to the PSTN? If so could you tell me how it is done? I'm told this
is the source of my call transfer problems and yet I cannot find
clear instructions for how the configuration is done.
Thanks,Steve
--
 ISC Network Engineering
The University of Pennsylvania
3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
Philadelphia, PA 19104
voice: 215-573-8396
  215-746-8001
fax: 215-898-9348
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


SV: [Asterisk-Users] IPSwitchBoard BETA

2005-03-16 Thread Thorben Jensen
 Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af Henry Devito
 Sendt: 16. marts 2005 16:17
 Til: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Emne: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IPSwitchBoard BETA
 
 I installed this and it seems to be working great.  Good job.  Just one
 question though,  What is the shared extensions file?
 
 
Hi Henry,

The Shared extension file is a file with extension (speed dial number)
that a number of users want to share, when IPSwitchBoard starts up, it will
merge the extensions in the shared extension file with your extensions.

You can make an extensions file by exporting extensions from IPSwitchBoard. 

Put this file on a shared network drive and point to that file and every
time IPSwitchBoard starts up, it will merge the information in that file.

regards

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call Center software opensource or commercial

2005-03-16 Thread Erick Perez
And what people are using to deploy super servers with astersik?
Itanium with linux? clusters of itanium with linux? or some RISC
processor with some *nix? cause it seems asterisk is only 100%
supported on Linux/Intel
or am i totally wrong?



On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 05:51:18 -0600, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   im my case im looking into 100 seats initially and going up to 1000 at
   the end (over a 18 months period).
   Looks like we will have to develop *a lot* if we want to use * for it.
   Maybe a commercial solution will be better at this time.
 
  On Cebit SGI announced a server solution based on Signate software
  (which is based on Asterisk) that can handle up to 5000 simultaneous
  calls. I don't know how the marketing drones have cooked up that number
  but perhaps it's interesting. See
  http://www.sgi.com/company_info/newsroom/press_releases/2005/march/von.html
 
 According to the marketing blurb, The benchmark was a standard SIPP test
 and was performed by SGI and Signate. The results compared similarly
 configured systems: an Altix 350 with dual Intel(r) 1.5GHz Itanium 2
 processors/400MHz front side bus/2GB memory compared to a dual 3.0GHz
 Pentium 4 processors/800MHz front side bus/2GB memory. The results
 based on simultaneous calls terminating with comparable voice quality
 were 5,002 for the Altix 350 versus 333 for the PC.
 
 Its interesting how marketing people leave out the details. The
 statement only addresses terminating calls (which one is left with the
 assumption the test only addressed call setup, not teardown, cdr, etc),
 doesn't mention whether any of those calls could actually carry on a
 conversation, hints that no other application (eg, voicemail) was
 in use simultanously, and most likely assumes the equivalent of
 canreinvite=yes on a local lan segment following call setup.
 
 However, the stats do seem to support what many of us have already
 experienced, and that is the pci bus limitations with some Intel
 chipsets is far less then reasonable for realtime apps (such as *).
 
 It would be very interesting to see some real life stats with a
 reasonable mix of * apps including voicemail, transcoding, T1s, etc.
 
 If the box could actually sustain 5,000 real life simultanous calls,
 it could replace a hugh percentage of the US class-5 Central Offices
 (not to mention PBXs). ;)
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


-- 

---
Erick Perez
Linux User 376588
http://counter.li.org/  (Get counted!!!)
Panama, Republic of Panama
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call Center software opensource or commercial

2005-03-16 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Erick Perez wrote:
And what people are using to deploy super servers with astersik?
Itanium with linux? clusters of itanium with linux? or some RISC
processor with some *nix? cause it seems asterisk is only 100%
supported on Linux/Intel
or am i totally wrong?
The highest-performing standard hardware to run Asterisk on today 
would be quad/octal Opteron (AMD X86-64) boxes.

In fact, hardware like that will very likely outperform the Altix system 
that Signate did their benchmarking on, for quite a lot less money.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream and Transfers

2005-03-16 Thread dean collins
Where did you get 1.05.23 from? The doc is available on the grandstream
site but not the actual firmware.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod Bacon
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 11:48 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream and Transfers

I'm running 1.0.5.22 (beta), and it is the best version I've found to
date.

I notice .23 is also available.

http://gs-firmware.gratissip.dk/




- Original Message - 
From: el Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 3:20 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream and Transfers


 Hi all,

 Just wondering if anyone's come across this issue, and what might be a
fix 
 for it:

 We've got several BT-101's deployed, and upgraded to firmware
v.1.0.5.16. 
 The phone can do proper supervised transfer, but _only_ once. If the
user 
 attempts to transfer a second time, it won't work.

 any suggestions/hints/tips are welcome..

 Flynn

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFAX problem

2005-03-16 Thread Vladyslav
Thx for your reply.

On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 17:35, Steve Underwood wrote:
 Hi Vladyslav,
 
 Use 0.0.2pre1, but add the line
 fax.verbose = TRUE;
 just after
 fax_init(fax, calling_party, NULL);
 
 That will turn on the detailed logging.
 
Added, recompiled and tested again.
 Is the listing you posted the entire log? It looks like there should be 
 more.
 
Yes, before there was some additional information 
 One common mistake people make - Did you use the |caller parameter 
 when running txfax?
yes I use that one.

 Regards,
 Steve
 
Here is new one : (but it's spandsp-0.0.2pre10)

*CLI -- Executing NoOp(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
-- Executing AGI(SIP/103-dfb6, set-timestamp.agi) in new stack
-- Executing System(SIP/103-dfb6, echo 16032005-18:15:06 -
VladK 103 - SIP/103-dfb6 - 901  /var/log/asterisk/calls) in new
stack
-- Executing DBput(SIP/103-dfb6, RepeatDial/103=901) in new
stack
-- DBput: family=RepeatDial, key=103, value=901
-- Executing DBget(SIP/103-dfb6, recv=Record/103) in new stack
-- DBget: varname=recv, family=Record, key=103
-- DBget: set variable recv to on
-- Executing GotoIf(SIP/103-dfb6, 1?7:9) in new stack
-- Goto (from-sip,901,7)
-- Executing SetVar(SIP/103-dfb6,
CALLFILENAME=20050316-181506-103-901) in new stack
-- Executing Monitor(SIP/103-dfb6, wav|20050316-181506-103-901)
in new stack
-- Executing Goto(SIP/103-dfb6, from-sip-post|901|1) in new
stack
-- Goto (from-sip-post,901,1)
-- Executing Answer(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
-- Executing TxFAX(SIP/103-dfb6, /tmp/testfax.tif|caller) in new
stack
Slow carrier up
Mar 16 18:15:10 NOTICE[10168]: rtp.c:540 ast_rtp_read: Unknown RTP codec
100 received
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 NSF: 20 00 00 79 00 00 00 82 0f 09 03 10 10 00 02 95 80 9c f8 80 40
01 49 02 41 52 41 59 4f 5a 20 55 4b 52 41 49 4e 45 23 20 03
NSF without final frame tag
The remote was made by 'Panasonic'
 DIS: 80 20 ee 99 84 80 11
DIS with final frame tag
In state 10
DIS:
  V.8 capable
  Prefer 256 octet blocks
  Can receive fax
  Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
  R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
  2D coding
  Scan line length: 215mm or 255mm
  Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
  Receiver's minimum scan line time: 5ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
  Error correction mode
  R8x15.4lines/mm
  Metric-based resolution preferred
  Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
DCS:
  Can receive fax
  Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
  2D coding
  Scan line length: 215mm
  Recording length: A4 (297mm)
  Minimum scan line time: 20ms
  Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
Start sending document
Start tx document
Changed from phase 2 to 4
 DCS: 83 00 c6 80 80 80 00
HDLC underflow in state 3
Changed from phase 4 to 6
Changed from phase 6 to 3
Slow carrier up
 CFR: 84
CFR with final frame tag
In state 4
Trainability test succeeded
Start tx page
Slow carrier down
Changed from phase 3 to 6

*CLI show ch
channel   channels  channeltypes
*CLI show channels
Channel  (ContextExtensionPri )   State Appl.
Data
0 active channel(s)


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call Center software opensource or commercial

2005-03-16 Thread ht
Thanks Kevin for this info,

If we want a box that can perform 60 calls. What would be apoproximate budget
for that using AMD x86-64 ?

µSelon Kevin P. Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Erick Perez wrote:
  And what people are using to deploy super servers with astersik?
  Itanium with linux? clusters of itanium with linux? or some RISC
  processor with some *nix? cause it seems asterisk is only 100%
  supported on Linux/Intel
  or am i totally wrong?

 The highest-performing standard hardware to run Asterisk on today
 would be quad/octal Opteron (AMD X86-64) boxes.

 In fact, hardware like that will very likely outperform the Altix system
 that Signate did their benchmarking on, for quite a lot less money.
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] NuFone + VoIPJet = busy busy busy

2005-03-16 Thread Jean-Michel Hiver

(obviously if you do other magic in your dialplan this needs to be adjusted.  
The important part is the 'g' flag to Dial (go on after hangup), and the NoOp 
which echos the dialstatus and hangupcause variables to the console.
 

How would you do this in an AGI script? Basically what I have at the 
moment is:

(minimize connection time, tries to open both nufone and voipjet and 
route through
which one is fastest)

my $dialstr = 
IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/$numberIAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/$number|120;
my $res = $::YKOZ_AGI-exec (DIAL $dialstr);

Here is what I see on the CLI:
AGI Rx  EXEC DIAL 
IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/01133692660587IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/01133692660587|120 
   -- AGI Script Executing Application: (DIAL) Options: 
(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/01133692660587IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/01133692660587|120)
   -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]/01133692660587
   -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]/01133692660587
   -- Call accepted by 216.118.117.46 (format ulaw)
   -- Format for call is ulaw
   -- Call accepted by 66.225.202.72 (format ulaw)
   -- Format for call is ulaw
   -- IAX2/voipjet/7 is making progress passing it to IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/1
   -- IAX2/NuFone/6 is circuit-busy
   -- Hungup 'IAX2/NuFone/6'
   -- IAX2/voipjet/7 is busy
   -- Hungup 'IAX2/voipjet/7'
 == Everyone is busy/congested at this time


Nufone is rock-solid stable.  I have been using them for about 5kmin/month 
over the past year with *no* issues, which is why I'd like to see what you're 
getting back for a dialstatus and hangupcause.
 

Well maybe it depends on the route you're using... you know, like 
'connect me to a mobile phone on some lost island in the indian ocean' 
might not be as reliable as 'pass me onto the library of new york' :)

Cheers,
Jean-Michel.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime does not work yet, ...

2005-03-16 Thread Matthew Boehm
 I changed the sequence first disallow and than allow. After
 restarting * it is working now!
 I am sure I copied the table and did not change it, ... somewhere it
 must have the wrong order.
 
 
 
 Thanks for your patient with me!

Glad we got it working.

-Matthew
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Best DB

2005-03-16 Thread Giudice, Salvatore
Use whichever you want. Go get your own benchmarks. I'm sure you will
find benchmarks all over the web based on different conditions. The fact
remains that enterprises are deploying MySQL 4:1 over postergreSQL. I
believe the driving factors for this are the ability to commercially
license Mysql for product integration over PostgreSQL's BSD license, and
the availability of support from MySQL directly. With regard to Redhat,
Fujitsu, etc - MySQL database support is not their main line of
business. If you believe different, then let's hear it. 

As for your 'artist license with your data' comment, put it into some
context. I would blame a programmer for trying to insert a string of 255
characters into a field only 100 character wide. Maybe you could blame
the dba for not building a schema to support the application.
Regardless, I would not call the database deficient because it truncates
your data to 100 characters and doesn't warn you with an error. Get
real. It is not as if this behavior is unexpected or some sort of a
surprise. 

Run whichever DB you want. It's your choice, as always. You are
certainly free to sit in your office frothing all over yourself in your
own twisted PostgreSQL fantasy. 


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 6:44 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Best DB

On March 15, 2005 06:04 pm, Giudice, Salvatore wrote:
 commercial licensing AND has a real enterprise class support structure
 behind it, or are you going to run with PostgreSQL (bow wow)
distributed
 under a BSD license with some mom and pop support shops and some
mailing

It's time to put up or shut up.

Can you please give supporting evidence that MySQL AG has no more
oomph in 
commercial support than companies like Command Prompt, Fujitsu, Red Hat,
or 
even PostgreSQL, Inc.?  Every single one of those organizations has 
commercial support available for PostgreSQL.  I'm genuinely curious if
you 
consider MySQL AG more of a company than Red Hat or Fujitsu.

Seriously.  You're frothing at the mouth and tripping over yourself
trying to 
make your point, and you're so far off base to begin with that you
couldn't 
possibly be more wrong.

As far as your benchmark points go, until you can show me properly
organized 
and open benchmarks, your point is totally invalid.  In my cursory check

(hint: try locating the open database bake-off from a couple years ago, 
phpbuilder's evaluation a few years back, http://benchw.sourceforge.net,
or 
locate anything done by independent testing groups) it appears that
under 
real-world load, Postgres trounces MySQL handily and can handle FAR more

concurrent connections than even a tuned-out MySQL server can handle.
Yes, 
Postgres needs some tuning out of the box, this has been hashed over 
repeatedly and nobody's denying it.  Yes, MySQL is fast for the simplest

queries and inserts.  And my personal favourite, Yes, MySQL will take 
artistic license with your data.  These are all facts that everyone
(MySQL AG 
included) but you seems to be able to agree upon.  The only benchmarks
you'll 
speak of are those found with mysql-bench, but those results are
generally 
held as a practical joke with zero relevance in real-world applications.

Your comment on licensing is also interesting.  I wonder, do you also
have 
problems with Apache because it too is released under a BSD license?
How 
about the BSD Unixes themselves?  How is BSD less good than GPL?
Honestly 
I'd love to know!

 Hey, it's your choice. Do you want to eat American Grade A American
beef
 or that strange meat flavored tofu? As long as it meets your needs,
 choose whatever you have the ability to handle.

Exactly my point.  This is *exactly* why I run PostgreSQL over MySQL.  

At any rate I've participated in this offtopic thread enough.  Unless
you post 
some practical examples to back up your points I will let you have the
last 
word.  The list archives will no doubt commemorate this particular 
thread.  :-)

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFAX problem

2005-03-16 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi Vladyslav,
The log looks good so far. The far end has negotiated. The fast modem 
has been tested. Transmission of the first page has been. What happens 
next. I don't think the log really stopped at that point. Did you wait 
long enough for the page transmission to complete?

Regards,
Steve
Vladyslav wrote:
Here is new one : (but it's spandsp-0.0.2pre10)
*CLI -- Executing NoOp(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
   -- Executing AGI(SIP/103-dfb6, set-timestamp.agi) in new stack
   -- Executing System(SIP/103-dfb6, echo 16032005-18:15:06 -
VladK 103 - SIP/103-dfb6 - 901  /var/log/asterisk/calls) in new
stack
   -- Executing DBput(SIP/103-dfb6, RepeatDial/103=901) in new
stack
   -- DBput: family=RepeatDial, key=103, value=901
   -- Executing DBget(SIP/103-dfb6, recv=Record/103) in new stack
   -- DBget: varname=recv, family=Record, key=103
   -- DBget: set variable recv to on
   -- Executing GotoIf(SIP/103-dfb6, 1?7:9) in new stack
   -- Goto (from-sip,901,7)
   -- Executing SetVar(SIP/103-dfb6,
CALLFILENAME=20050316-181506-103-901) in new stack
   -- Executing Monitor(SIP/103-dfb6, wav|20050316-181506-103-901)
in new stack
   -- Executing Goto(SIP/103-dfb6, from-sip-post|901|1) in new
stack
   -- Goto (from-sip-post,901,1)
   -- Executing Answer(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
   -- Executing TxFAX(SIP/103-dfb6, /tmp/testfax.tif|caller) in new
stack
Slow carrier up
Mar 16 18:15:10 NOTICE[10168]: rtp.c:540 ast_rtp_read: Unknown RTP codec
100 received
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 NSF: 20 00 00 79 00 00 00 82 0f 09 03 10 10 00 02 95 80 9c f8 80 40
01 49 02 41 52 41 59 4f 5a 20 55 4b 52 41 49 4e 45 23 20 03
NSF without final frame tag
The remote was made by 'Panasonic'
 DIS: 80 20 ee 99 84 80 11
DIS with final frame tag
In state 10
DIS:
 V.8 capable
 Prefer 256 octet blocks
 Can receive fax
 Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
 R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
 2D coding
 Scan line length: 215mm or 255mm
 Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
 Receiver's minimum scan line time: 5ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
 Error correction mode
 R8x15.4lines/mm
 Metric-based resolution preferred
 Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
DCS:
 Can receive fax
 Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
 2D coding
 Scan line length: 215mm
 Recording length: A4 (297mm)
 Minimum scan line time: 20ms
 Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
Start sending document
Start tx document
Changed from phase 2 to 4
 

DCS: 83 00 c6 80 80 80 00
   

HDLC underflow in state 3
Changed from phase 4 to 6
Changed from phase 6 to 3
Slow carrier up
 CFR: 84
CFR with final frame tag
In state 4
Trainability test succeeded
Start tx page
Slow carrier down
Changed from phase 3 to 6
*CLI show ch
channel   channels  channeltypes
*CLI show channels
   Channel  (ContextExtensionPri )   State Appl.
Data
0 active channel(s)
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call Center software opensource or commercial

2005-03-16 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we want a box that can perform 60 calls. What would be apoproximate budget
for that using AMD x86-64 ?
60 calls can easily be done on a 3.4GHz Pentium 4 box, no special 
hardware is required.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk E911?

2005-03-16 Thread Matt
How exactly does Asterisk provide E911 service??
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] NuFone + VoIPJet = busy busy busy

2005-03-16 Thread Eric Wieling
Once you run Dial from an AGI script, you lose control of the call via 
the AGI script.

Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:

(obviously if you do other magic in your dialplan this needs to be 
adjusted.  The important part is the 'g' flag to Dial (go on after 
hangup), and the NoOp which echos the dialstatus and hangupcause 
variables to the console.
 

How would you do this in an AGI script? Basically what I have at the 
moment is:

(minimize connection time, tries to open both nufone and voipjet and 
route through
which one is fastest)

my $dialstr = 
IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/$numberIAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/$number|120;
my $res = $::YKOZ_AGI-exec (DIAL $dialstr);

Here is what I see on the CLI:
AGI Rx  EXEC DIAL 
IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/01133692660587IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/01133692660587|120 
   -- AGI Script Executing Application: (DIAL) Options: 
(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/01133692660587IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/01133692660587|120)
   -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]/01133692660587
   -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]/01133692660587
   -- Call accepted by 216.118.117.46 (format ulaw)
   -- Format for call is ulaw
   -- Call accepted by 66.225.202.72 (format ulaw)
   -- Format for call is ulaw
   -- IAX2/voipjet/7 is making progress passing it to IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/1
   -- IAX2/NuFone/6 is circuit-busy
   -- Hungup 'IAX2/NuFone/6'
   -- IAX2/voipjet/7 is busy
   -- Hungup 'IAX2/voipjet/7'
 == Everyone is busy/congested at this time


Nufone is rock-solid stable.  I have been using them for about 
5kmin/month over the past year with *no* issues, which is why I'd like 
to see what you're getting back for a dialstatus and hangupcause.
 

Well maybe it depends on the route you're using... you know, like 
'connect me to a mobile phone on some lost island in the indian ocean' 
might not be as reliable as 'pass me onto the library of new york' :)

Cheers,
Jean-Michel.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest.
Mark Twain
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] CLI SIP Client

2005-03-16 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Klaus Peras wrote:
Hey there,
does anybody know a CLI SIP Client für Linux?
I think you may find one in Vovida.org
/O
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Best DB

2005-03-16 Thread David Brodbeck
 -Original Message-
 From: Giudice, Salvatore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 As for your 'artist license with your data' comment, put it into some
 context. I would blame a programmer for trying to insert a 
 string of 255
 characters into a field only 100 character wide. Maybe you could blame
 the dba for not building a schema to support the application.
 Regardless, I would not call the database deficient because 
 it truncates
 your data to 100 characters and doesn't warn you with an error.

And the sad fact is, if the software isn't doing any data verification, it's
probably not doing error checking either.  So if the DB throws an error,
your database will be protected, but the application will probably crash or
do something undefined.  Which of those situations (truncated data, or a
crashed app) is better depends on the application.  It's not clear cut.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problem starting Asterisk - libssl.so.4 cannot be found

2005-03-16 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 15:04 +, Andy and Jayne Slim wrote:
 I'm sure this is a pretty basic problem, unfortunately I am a telecomms 
 rather 
 than a Linux person so any suggestions would be most appreciated.  I have 
 successfully downloaded and installed the various Asterisk packages.  
 However, when I try to start Asterisk, I immediately get a message saying 
 module 'libssl.so.4' cannot be found and the startup is halted.  I don't have 
 this file anywhere on my system but I read on some articles that this was a 
 symbolic link to libssl.so.0.9 so I did an 'ln -s' to point the offending 
 module there.  This made no difference.  I therefore upgraded my Open SSL 
 version to 0.9.7d and then re-installed Asterisk.  Still no joy.  I have 
 moved the module and its symbolic link to the same folder as the Asterisk 
 executable, and checked the path statements in ld.conf, but the program still 
 will not start.  Please can someone advise me on what else I should try to 
 resolve this?

Where did you get your version of asterisk? It sounds like you are
having dependency problems. It sounds like you downloaded a binary copy
of asterisk and the vendor of that package didn't put in proper
dependency information to stop you from installing it till all the
required packages are installed.

You really should download the source, compile, and install. This will
mean that asterisk will be linked to your libraries.
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Best DB

2005-03-16 Thread Joe Greco
 I believe the driving factors for this are the ability to commercially
 license Mysql for product integration over PostgreSQL's BSD license,

This is a ridiculous FUD statement.  Are you actually trying to suggest that
one cannot commercially license PostgreSQL?

That's simply FALSE.

The primary difference is that you are likely to have to *pay* for a
commercial MySQL license, and you don't need to *pay* for one for
PostgreSQL.

So let's not be completely stupid.  You can pay for your database if you
prefer.  Some of us prefer free software.

... JG
-- 
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
won't contact you again. - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk retains DTMF Control Even whenanExternal IVR System is dialed

2005-03-16 Thread Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT)
Jason,

exten = s, 4, Dial(${VOICEPULSE}/011${ARG1}, ${LONGTIMEOUT}, Tt)

When I removed T and t options from dial command, the DTMF digit
recognition started working. Working line is below

exten = s, 2, Dial(${VOICEPULSE}/011${ARG1}, ${LONGTIMEOUT})

I will not change the features.conf, unless I get into this problem once
again

Thanks for the suggestion.

Seshu


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason
Williams
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:14 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk retains DTMF Control Even
whenanExternal IVR System is dialed

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:13:40 -0500, Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 atxfer = *2   ; Attended transfer


Remove attended transfer capability and then you will be able o enter
*2XXX

Jason 

 
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.  Sender does 
not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited. 
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Meetme doesn't react to DTMF keys

2005-03-16 Thread Walter Klomp
Hi,
I am playing with conferencing, but might have hit a bug... Any use who 
wants to hang up or leave the conference should press the # key, after 
which they get a goodbye message and the call gets disconnected. 
However, this does not happen. whatever keys are pressed by whichever 
party gets heard on every other party.  I am using Zap channels (Digium 
T405p)

My extensions.conf looks like this
[macro-meetme]
exten = s,1,Answer
exten = s,2,Wait(1)
exten = s,3,MeetMe(${ARG1}|pMAx)
exten = s,4,Playback(vm-goodbye)
exten = s,5,Hangup
[conference]
   exten = 1300,1,Macro(meetme,1300)
The p option should take care of the hangup issue, correct ?
Am I missing something ?
Thanks
Walter
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFAX problem

2005-03-16 Thread Vladyslav
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 18:25, Steve Underwood wrote:
 Hi Vladyslav,
 
 The log looks good so far. The far end has negotiated. The fast modem 
 has been tested. Transmission of the first page has been. What happens 
 next. I don't think the log really stopped at that point. Did you wait 
 long enough for the page transmission to complete?

After that point Changed from phase 3 to 6 
fax machine says Incomplete + error code.
And that's all.

BTW, Fax machine connected via SIPURA-2000 (which registered directly on
* and use ulaw)
But I could receive fax from PSTN via *-SIPURA-Fax machine
 
 
 Regards,
 Steve
 
 
 Vladyslav wrote:
 
 Here is new one : (but it's spandsp-0.0.2pre10)
 
 *CLI -- Executing NoOp(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
 -- Executing AGI(SIP/103-dfb6, set-timestamp.agi) in new stack
 -- Executing System(SIP/103-dfb6, echo 16032005-18:15:06 -
 VladK 103 - SIP/103-dfb6 - 901  /var/log/asterisk/calls) in new
 stack
 -- Executing DBput(SIP/103-dfb6, RepeatDial/103=901) in new
 stack
 -- DBput: family=RepeatDial, key=103, value=901
 -- Executing DBget(SIP/103-dfb6, recv=Record/103) in new stack
 -- DBget: varname=recv, family=Record, key=103
 -- DBget: set variable recv to on
 -- Executing GotoIf(SIP/103-dfb6, 1?7:9) in new stack
 -- Goto (from-sip,901,7)
 -- Executing SetVar(SIP/103-dfb6,
 CALLFILENAME=20050316-181506-103-901) in new stack
 -- Executing Monitor(SIP/103-dfb6, wav|20050316-181506-103-901)
 in new stack
 -- Executing Goto(SIP/103-dfb6, from-sip-post|901|1) in new
 stack
 -- Goto (from-sip-post,901,1)
 -- Executing Answer(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
 -- Executing TxFAX(SIP/103-dfb6, /tmp/testfax.tif|caller) in new
 stack
 Slow carrier up
 Mar 16 18:15:10 NOTICE[10168]: rtp.c:540 ast_rtp_read: Unknown RTP codec
 100 received
 Slow carrier down
 Slow carrier up
 Slow carrier down
 Slow carrier up
  NSF: 20 00 00 79 00 00 00 82 0f 09 03 10 10 00 02 95 80 9c f8 80 40
 01 49 02 41 52 41 59 4f 5a 20 55 4b 52 41 49 4e 45 23 20 03
 NSF without final frame tag
 The remote was made by 'Panasonic'
  DIS: 80 20 ee 99 84 80 11
 DIS with final frame tag
 In state 10
 DIS:
   V.8 capable
   Prefer 256 octet blocks
   Can receive fax
   Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
   R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
   2D coding
   Scan line length: 215mm or 255mm
   Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
   Receiver's minimum scan line time: 5ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
   Error correction mode
   R8x15.4lines/mm
   Metric-based resolution preferred
   Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
 DCS:
   Can receive fax
   Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
   2D coding
   Scan line length: 215mm
   Recording length: A4 (297mm)
   Minimum scan line time: 20ms
   Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
 Start sending document
 Start tx document
 Changed from phase 2 to 4
   
 
 DCS: 83 00 c6 80 80 80 00
 
 
 HDLC underflow in state 3
 Changed from phase 4 to 6
 Changed from phase 6 to 3
 Slow carrier up
  CFR: 84
 CFR with final frame tag
 In state 4
 Trainability test succeeded
 Start tx page
 Slow carrier down
 Changed from phase 3 to 6
 
 *CLI show ch
 channel   channels  channeltypes
 *CLI show channels
 Channel  (ContextExtensionPri )   State Appl.
 Data
 0 active channel(s)
   
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk E911?

2005-03-16 Thread Rich Adamson

 How exactly does Asterisk provide E911 service??

It doesn't do anything with 911. You tell * what to do when someone
dials 911 via your dialplan.

To avoid legal issues down the road, I'd suggest handling it via a
local pstn line (one way or another), and install a Red Phone with
a normal pstn line for emergency use. (The pstn line for the Red
Phone 'could' be used for incoming faxes as well, and when combined
with something like an spa3000, will handle * to pstn 911 calls.)


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Call Center software opensource or commercial

2005-03-16 Thread Vladyslav
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 18:31, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  If we want a box that can perform 60 calls. What would be apoproximate 
  budget
  for that using AMD x86-64 ?
 
 60 calls can easily be done on a 3.4GHz Pentium 4 box, no special 
 hardware is required.

Is that with channels recording ? ;)

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk E911?

2005-03-16 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Matt wrote:
How exactly does Asterisk provide E911 service??
Could you ask a slightly more open-ended and ambiguous question next 
time? This one might actually have some real answers...

Asterisk does not provide _any_ service, the user configuring Asterisk 
makes that happen. Asterisk can be used to connect to any traditional 
PSTN lines that have E911 access. There are also other means of handling 
E911 calls, depending on what sort of trunks you have available and how 
large a company you are.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   3   >