RE: [asterisk-users] SIP Options Reply Ignored

2007-06-04 Thread Ian Clough


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: 03 June 2007 18:30
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP Options Reply Ignored

On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Ian Clough wrote:

 The problem comes when I try to use a SIP phone at home (also behind a 
 NAT router). The phone registers correctly and I can see the SIP OPTONS 
 packets being sent to the phone (SNOM 190).  I can see an OK reply being 
 received by Asterisk (using SIP DEBUG). However the OK reply appears to 
 be ignored and a retransmission is made and the phone is marked as 
 UNREACHABLE and will not accept any calls.

Alex   Wait, so this is the phone registering to Asterisk?  Any
inconsistencies 
Alex in the source/destination ports vis-a-vis the NAT state pinholes?

--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Direct : +1-678-954-0671

Yes once the phone registers OK asterisk sends the OPTIONS packets
(qualify=yes)
This is an example. It shows asterisk reading a reply from by phone to
transmission #3 and then sending retransmission #4

intechdial*CLI
--- SIP read from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:2057 --- SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 207.13.251.93:5060;branch=z9hG4bK24ffe501;rport=40804
From: asterisk sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as35e434f3
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2057;line=15aykp4d
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 102 OPTIONS
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2057;line=15aykp4d
User-Agent: snom190/3.60x
Accept-Language: en
Accept: application/sdp
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, OPTIONS, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, PRACK,
MESSAGE, INFO
Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer
Supported: timer, 100rel, replaces
Content-Length: 0


-
--- (14 headers 0 lines) ---
Retransmitting #4 (NAT) to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:2057:
OPTIONS sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2057;line=15aykp4d SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060;branch=z9hG4bK24ffe501;rport
Max-Forwards: 70
From: asterisk sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as35e434f3
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2057;line=15aykp4d
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 102 OPTIONS
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX SVN-trunk-r63567
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:01:26 GMT
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
Supported: replaces
Content-Length: 0

Where xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the external address of my home router
Yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy is the external address of the office router
207.13.251.93 is the internal address of the asterisk server
192.168.1.50 is the internal address of the phone

Ian C




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] click to call

2007-06-04 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 11:29:57PM -0500, Anton Krall wrote:
 True, maybe I didnt make myself clear on that point, what i meant was, Im
 not looking for an app that would let people click a sip: URL type to
 make a call using their already installed softphone but rather allow any
 user that visits our website 

What assumptions are of any user?

* Java?
* Flash?
* ActiveX?
* Pure javascript?
* Any other technology?

A specific dialect of one of the above?

Obviously with pure HTML this is impossible. Almost obviously that with
pure javascript as well.

 to click on something and either open a web
 softphone or download a small one that’s preconfigured and allow them to
 call a predefined extension on our asterisk server.

And use a preconfigured sound card on their local system. 

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen   
icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel on CENTOS servercd

2007-06-04 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
One comment if I may:

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+Linux+Centos does need some
cleanup. Let alone merging of the two separate procedures and an update.

Also:

On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 06:22:57PM -0400, Lee Jenkins wrote:
 Khaled Chehab wrote:
 I suffered a lot from installing zaptel 1.4.2 on centos servercd ,Sure 
 there
 is someone did that, Please in need to have the installation procedure step
 by step. Its too urgent for me .
 
 Thanks alot 
 
 
 
 These scripts are working pretty well for me.  They are based on a 
 script I found on the wiki.
 
 # Script to download pre reqs for installation
 # ==
 
 #!/bin/bash
 
 rpm --import http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-4

Isn't this done by the installer?

 
 yum -y install kernel-source bison openssl-devel

Why do you need kernel-source?  I know it is fun do download some extra
40Gigs, but apart from that, the kernel-devel / kernel-smp-devel is all
you need to build zaptel. (likewise linux-headers-`uname -r` on 
Debian/Ubuntu )

 
 yum -y update
 
 # Use kernel-devel  instead of kernel-smp-devel
 # if not a SMP machine
 # |==|
   |  |
 yum -y install gcc kernel kernel-smp-devel bison openssl-devel

Hmmm you install kernel, but kernel-*smp*-devel . Strange
ocmbination.

Why not simply 'yum update' to get the latest kernel, if needed? This
will upgrade either 'kernel' or 'kernel-smp', depending on the installed
package.

If you don't need a kernel upgrade you don't need the following:

 
 shutdown -r now
 
 # end script
 
 
 
 
 # Script to download asterisk, etc and build/install
 # ==
 #!/bin/bash
 
 rm -f /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/*
 
 cd /usr/src
 rm -rf asterisk
 wget http://ftp.digium.com/pub/asterisk/releases/asterisk-1.2.18.tar.gz
 tar -zxvf asterisk-1.2.18.tar.gz
 mv asterisk-1.2.18 asterisk
 
 cd /usr/src
 rm -rf zaptel
 wget http://ftp.digium.com/pub/zaptel/releases/zaptel-1.2.17.1.tar.gz
 tar -zxvf zaptel-1.2.17.1.tar.gz
 mv zaptel-1.2.17.1 zaptel
 
 cd /usr/src
 rm -rf asterisk-addons
 wget 
 http://ftp.digium.com/pub/asterisk/releases/asterisk-addons-1.2.6.tar.gz
 tar -zxvf asterisk-addons-1.2.6.tar.gz
 mv asterisk-addons-1.2.6 asterisk-addons
 
 cd /usr/src
 rm -rf asterisk-sounds
 wget 
 http://ftp.digium.com/pub/asterisk/releases/asterisk-sounds-1.2.1.tar.gz
 tar -zxvf asterisk-sounds-1.2.1.tar.gz
 mv asterisk-sounds-1.2.1 asterisk-sounds
 
 
 cd /usr/src/zaptel
 make clean
 make install
 make config
 
 cd /usr/src/asterisk
 make clean
 make install
 make samples
 make config
 
 cd /usr/src/asterisk-addons
 make clean
 make install
 
 cd /usr/src/asterisk-sounds
 make install

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen   
icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] nvlinedetect for Asterisk 1.4

2007-06-04 Thread aslay


Hi All,

I need nvlinedetect and installation guide for
my asterisk server version 1.4, I appreciate if some one
can help me on this.

I have spent so much time to search google for the answer but
no luck. The only solution that I found is nvlinedetect (0.9) for
asterisk 1.2. I encountered compilation error with nvlinedetect
0.9 on my asterisk 1.4

ASLAY







___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] click to call

2007-06-04 Thread Tim Panton


On 3 Jun 2007, at 03:37, Steve Totaro wrote:





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Collins
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 10:04 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] click to call


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[mailto:asterisk-users-

[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Totaro
Sent: Saturday, 2 June 2007 9:41 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] click to call





Then there is risk that the call quality will be poor which will

make

your company look bad as well.

Anyways, I prefer email over the phone.  Funny huh?

Thanks,
Steve Totaro
http://www.asteriskhelpdesk.com
KB3OPB







Hmm yes Skype quality very bad, hmmm packet 8, vonage and every other
voip provider very bad.

Dude give it a rest.



Regards,

Dean Collins
Cognation Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1-212-203-4357 Ph
+61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial).



Again, you are selling a product and have an agenda Dude.  Sales  
101,
create demand in the customer's mind (even when there really is not  
any

in reality).

The only apples to apples comparison you made is Skype and they do not
use Java or IAX that I am aware of.  Packet8 and Vonage are completely
irrelevant and just your way of spinning the issue in your direction.
Welcome to the no spin zone.

Like I said, OHHH cool!  I can click this button and call.

Let's see some usage stats.  The proof is the pudding.  ROI?  Usage?
Customer impressions?

Until you can provide these details, then I think it is you who should
give it a rest.

Thanks,
Steve



As a point of fact, Dean is no longer speaking as a rep of Mexuar  
(check his .sig)


Mexuar's official position is to recognize that in many use-cases
there will be a significant number of uses who won't be able or
willing to use a softphone (browser based or not). Solution
providers will need to provide 'conventional' call back solutions
alongside the pure voip style.

In our 'Corraleta connect' hosted solution we do exactly that.

There are some demographics where this isn't necessary,
it is up to the solution provider to identify this requirement - not
us as a technology provider.


Tim Panton

www.mexuar.com



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] click to call

2007-06-04 Thread Tim Panton


On 4 Jun 2007, at 08:14, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:


On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 11:29:57PM -0500, Anton Krall wrote:
True, maybe I didnt make myself clear on that point, what i meant  
was, Im
not looking for an app that would let people click a sip: URL  
type to
make a call using their already installed softphone but rather  
allow any

user that visits our website


What assumptions are of any user?

* Java?


We are seeing _very_ high numbers for users with Java  1.4 installed


* Flash?
* ActiveX?
* Pure javascript?


Again most desktop browsers support javascript.


* Any other technology?

A specific dialect of one of the above?

Obviously with pure HTML this is impossible. Almost obviously that  
with

pure javascript as well.


Yep, I have never seen an audio capture interface for javascript.




to click on something and either open a web
softphone or download a small one that’s preconfigured and allow  
them to

call a predefined extension on our asterisk server.


And use a preconfigured sound card on their local system.


For 'consumer' OS's like windows and OSX that's pretty much the
norm. For Linux it isn't (yet), it varies from distribution to  
distribution.





Tim Panton

www.mexuar.net
www.westhawk.co.uk/



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Mixing Vars into Voicemail WAVs

2007-06-04 Thread Robert Goodyear
Has anyone out there tried to mix the envelope metadata for  
voicemails into the audio payload that's stored by Asterisk? I would  
like to have the CID and Timestamp baked into the beginning of the  
WAV file, not just as text in the email itself.


Thanks!
-Rob.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] wifi sip phone real-world experiences?

2007-06-04 Thread Tim Panton


On 4 Jun 2007, at 01:00, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:


On Sunday 03 June 2007 4:30 pm, Alex Crow wrote:

No frills, specs look good, price seems excellent!
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/ProductInfo.asp?WebProductID=369519


That's a terrible phone.  I've tried them.  the screen is pretty  
much useless,

the buttons are *TINY*, the battery life horrible, and the ringtones
gimmicky.

I haven't tried WEP or WPA on these things, but the phones I've  
gotten rid of

long ago due to their problems.

-A.


If you can face the configuration hell, the Nokia e60 should do what  
you want


Tim.

Tim Panton

www.mexuar.net
www.westhawk.co.uk/



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Unicall/R2 for Asterisk 1.4 Available for TESTING

2007-06-04 Thread Tobias Wolf
Hi all,

sorry if i have missed something, i was just curious what unicall
actually is, what the main features are and did a quick search on
voip-info.org and plain old google but didn't find some source of
information that simply says : Unicall is this and does that ...

Can anyone point me to some source of information ?

Thanks a lot ...

Tobias Wolf
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Digium Card

2007-06-04 Thread Arun Kumar

HI


I'm looking for a card that support both PRI and TDM. Please suggest me ?


thanks

arun
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Issue with Grandstream ATA 496.

2007-06-04 Thread Mauro Zanin
Hi everybody,
I have bought one 496 to use as ATA for two analog extensions in my office.
I'm experiencing strange behaviuors. The ATA blocks itself and needs to be
rebooted. Sometimes it hungs the lines(ISDN bristuffed HFC single isdn
line). It was update to last available firmware.
Has anybody those issues?

Best regards

Mauro

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Wireless IP Phone with external Telephone Book

2007-06-04 Thread Tobias Wolf
Hi,

we are searching for wireless IP Phones (DECT preferred) with have an
solution for an external telephone book. We don't want to enter all of
our numbers into every telephone, but have one location for all the
numbers and every phone looks them up there, e.g. an ldap server.

We have tried Kirk but they are working on an solution without any
information when it will be available.

Does anyone knows an vendor which supports this feature ?

Regards,

Tobias Wolf
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Digium Card

2007-06-04 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 01:08:15PM +0400, Arun Kumar wrote:
 HI
 
 I'm looking for a card that support both PRI and TDM. Please suggest me ?

Non such card. You need two cards. 

Why exactly do you need a single card?

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen   
icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Cutted audio or 2/3s blankson EuroISDN- Asterisk1.4

2007-06-04 Thread Steve Hanselman
We're running 1.4.0 of asterisk
1.4.2.1 of zaptel
And kernel 2.6.20-1.2316.fc5smp



The information contained in this email is intended for the personal and 
confidential use
of the addressee only. It may also be privileged information. If you are not 
the intended
recipient then you are hereby notified that you have received this document in 
error and
that any review, distribution or copying of this document is strictly 
prohibited. If you have
received  this communication in error, please notify Brendata immediately on:

+44 (0)1268 466100, or email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

Brendata (UK) Ltd
Nevendon Hall, Nevendon Road, Basildon, Essex. SS13 1BX  UK
Registered Office as above. Registered in England No. 2764339

See our current vacancies at www.brendata.co.uk
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Unicall/R2 for Asterisk 1.4 Available for TESTING

2007-06-04 Thread Humberto Figuera

HI Tobias,

look in www.soft-switch.org/unicall/unicall/index.html ;p

--
Humberto Figuera - Using Linux 2.6.20
Usuario GNU/Linux 369709
Caracas - Venezuela
GPG Key Fingerprint = 5AAC DF0C 00F4 2834 28BA  37AD 3364 01D1 74CA 0603
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] yum om centos

2007-06-04 Thread Khaled Chehab
I have 2 servers, one connected to internet and the other is on a private
lan have no access to internet.

On the first server I update the kernel by yum update 

And installed asterisk prerequisite module 

yum install gcc gcc-c++ compat-gcc-32 compat-gcc-32-c++ autoconf \ libtool
make automake automake14 automake15 automake16 automake17 \ bison byacc flex
libtermcap libtermcap-devel newt newt-devel \ ncurses ncurses-devel
openssl-devel zlib zlib-devel krb5-devel

 

 

I zipped /var/cache/yum from the first server and extract it on the second
server at the same directory.

 

On the second server I tried to update using

yum update

 but the yum update failed.

 

 

How can I do that with out connecting the second server to internet .

 

 

 

Khaled 

Regards

 

 




*
No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf 
of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation 
by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual in this 
electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or its 
subsidiaries and associates.

This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed to the 
addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from disclosure 
belonging to Xplorium.

If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message and its 
attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and notify the 
sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or attachment or 
disclose its content to any other person.

Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic message and any of 
its attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses or other defects.
*
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] click to call

2007-06-04 Thread Gordon Henderson

On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Anton Krall wrote:


Hi Gordon

So, mexuar solution was that java softphone that you talked about?


Yes.


Any other small softphone type solution around, something on the same lines
of what you described, something that the user could download but could be
preconfigured or passed parameters to so they user wont have to mess with
settings.


When looking for something else, I found that you can get a version of 
x-lite which can be dynamically re-configured at download time - Sipgate 
(www.sipgate.co.uk) use this. Once logged into their site, you download 
their version of x-lite (for free) and it just works on your PC, as 
they've included the account, IP address, etc. details as part of the 
download.


Cost (from x-lite) was about the same ~£1000 for the setup fee and tools 
required (from memory). The down-side of that version of x-lite is that 
it's windows only (Although the generic x-lite is multi platform) I looked 
at idefisk (my soft-phone of choice), but I wasn't sure if that too could 
be dynamically configured at download time. (Again about the same cost to 
have your own custom skin on it, etc.)


These both end up as installed programs though - not transient like a 
java based one.



Reading through these threads, it's clear to me that there is confusion as 
to what click to call really means (for some people). I think the issue 
is simply that there is more than one way to do it!


I think the OP in this thread wanted something along the lines of what I 
described, but the other (or classic way?) of click to call would 
involve the web visitor entering in their phone number on the web page, 
pushing click to call, then it initiating a call via (eg) a .call file 
being placed in the asterisk call spool directory, so their phone rings, 
they pick it up, then the agents phone rings... and they talk to each 
other, with the agent footing the bill as it's then a PSTN call. The Java 
method is a pure VoIP method, so might be more attractive in some cases... 
But I'd be glad to enter one of my 0909[1] numbers into a click-to-call 
box ;-)


Gordon
[1] Calls cost the sender £1.50 a minute, and the owner of the number can 
get a substantial chunk of that!___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] wifi sip phone real-world experiences?

2007-06-04 Thread Gordon Henderson

On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:


On Sunday 03 June 2007 4:30 pm, Alex Crow wrote:

No frills, specs look good, price seems excellent!
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/ProductInfo.asp?WebProductID=369519


That's a terrible phone.  I've tried them.  the screen is pretty much useless,
the buttons are *TINY*, the battery life horrible, and the ringtones
gimmicky.


I have to disagree on at least one point here - Battery life. I don't 
think 3 or 4 days standby and several hours of talk time makes for a 
horrible battery life.


The F1000G has other faillings, but battery life isn't one of them!

I haven't tried WEP or WPA on these things, but the phones I've gotten 
rid of long ago due to their problems.


Mine works with both WEP and WPA. It just occasionally won't re-attach to 
an access point (iwthout rebooting) and won't roam between access points 
at all.


I think for the cost (and you can get them cheaper than from Scan!) 
they're not bad, but still in the experimental/toy category than something 
I'd deploy to clients.


Gordon
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] yum om centos

2007-06-04 Thread Jaswinder Singh

independently install each rpm via rpm command :-/

On 04/06/07, Khaled Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:





I have 2 servers, one connected to internet and the other is on a private
lan have no access to internet.

On the first server I update the kernel by yum update

And installed asterisk prerequisite module

yum install gcc gcc-c++ compat-gcc-32 compat-gcc-32-c++ autoconf \ libtool
make automake automake14 automake15 automake16 automake17 \ bison byacc flex
libtermcap libtermcap-devel newt newt-devel \ ncurses ncurses-devel
openssl-devel zlib zlib-devel krb5-devel





I zipped /var/cache/yum from the first server and extract it on the second
server at the same directory.



On the second server I tried to update using

yum update

 but the yum update failed.





How can I do that with out connecting the second server to internet .







Khaled

Regards





 
 *
 No employee or agent is authorized to conclude
any binding agreement on behalf of
Xplorium with another party by e-mail
without express written confirmation by an
officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by
an individual in this electronic message
do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium
or its subsidiaries and associates.

 This electronic message and its attachments are
solely addressed to the addressee(s), and
contain confidential information protected
from disclosure belonging to Xplorium.

 If you are not the intended addressee of this
electronic message and its attachments,
kindly delete it immediately from your system and
notify the sender by electronic mail. You
must not copy this message or attachment
or disclose its content to any other
person.

 Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this
electronic message and any of its
attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses
or other defects.
 *


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Digium Card

2007-06-04 Thread Andrew Latham

Tzafir

Most small/medium companies have a T1 for all their phone needs.
Internally there is a need for some analog lines.
* Fax Machine - FXS
* Security System (most ask/demand two lines) FXS
* Paging - FXO
* Dialup systems


Andrew


On 6/4/07, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 01:08:15PM +0400, Arun Kumar wrote:
 HI

 I'm looking for a card that support both PRI and TDM. Please suggest me ?

Non such card. You need two cards.

Why exactly do you need a single card?

--
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




--
---
Andrew Latham - AKA: LATHAMA (lay-th-ham-eh)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If any of the above are down we have bigger problems than my email!
Hind sight is most always 20/20 or better.
---
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Re: click to call

2007-06-04 Thread Steven
I am using the free 
http://www.babarnazmi.citril.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7sid=fd8047cffb13074969d3418064f4eb31
It is working as you described.

It appears to be working well.

-- 
-- 
Steven

http://www.glimasoutheast.org



Anton Krall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The idea is to put some kind of embedded app on the website so customers
with mics can just click an icon or image and connect to our sales people or
customer support staff...

So far for what I've seen, there is some misconception of the terms.. click
to dial can mean if you see a number on a webpage, click on it and your
softphone will dial it.. but can also mean click on the image and it will
connect you to the sales people, for example.

I'm looking for the latter.




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mail-lists
Sent: Jueves, 31 de Mayo de 2007 10:18 a.m.
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] click to call

Anton Krall wrote:
 I have been looking around for examples or code on making a click to call
 application for web sites... has anybody had any luck on this topic? Is
 there any open source code out ther that could do this?

What we have done in the past is created url's like this : sip:4044565941.

Xlite will register itself as the sip handler on your system.

If you want a generic click to call (ability to call numbers on any
given website) check out moziax
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users






 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] wifi sip phone real-world experiences?

2007-06-04 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Monday 04 June 2007 8:24 am, Bryan Laird wrote:
   - Physically the phone feels very light and cheap, that if you were
 to drop it that it might not survive very many of them.  The buttons
 feel more
 like a toy than anything else but once you get beyond that it works.

How are they for big hands?  I'll have to do some checking around to see if I 
can find a rubber case for it or something, it's all concrete floors here.

 - Address book storage is ok the interface from the phone is fairly
 standard for what you would see in a cell phone and adding entries
 isn't really
 all that horrid of a task.  You can also add entries via the web
 interface which does make for an easier way to add several entries
 but the lack of
 anything resembling a 'sync' function could be considered bothersome.

Bugger.

 Last thing, one neat thing about the wip300 if you are adventurous is
 the fact that the firmware is under GPL... so if you really felt like
 it you could probably change the behavior of
 the phone.

This I was not aware of.  I will certainly evaluate this phone and it's bigger 
brother.

 Anyway sorry for the long message but I felt like chiming in on
 this.  All in all I don't think it's a horrible phone I do however
 think it's over priced for what it is but not enough demand on
 this type of device is always going to keep the price up in the air.

Your message is *exactly* the kind of reply I was hoping to get.  Thank you so 
much for taking the time to write such a long response.  I truly appreciate 
it.

-A.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Wireless IP Phone with external Telephone Book

2007-06-04 Thread Dave Bour
Not perfect solution but aastra sets support xml. Which then can do server 
based directory. If you can wait 2 weeks or so, I should be able to tell you 
how welworks as its my next project. 

D
Dave Bour
Desktop Solution Center
905.381.0077
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

For those who just want it to work...
Giving you complete IT peace of mind. 

(Sent via Blackberry - hence message may be shorter than my usual verbose 
responses)
PIN 4cc364db (as of March 24, 2007)  

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Asterisk-Users' asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Mon Jun 04 05:16:01 2007
Subject: [asterisk-users] Wireless IP Phone with external Telephone Book

Hi,

we are searching for wireless IP Phones (DECT preferred) with have an
solution for an external telephone book. We don't want to enter all of
our numbers into every telephone, but have one location for all the
numbers and every phone looks them up there, e.g. an ldap server.

We have tried Kirk but they are working on an solution without any
information when it will be available.

Does anyone knows an vendor which supports this feature ?

Regards,

Tobias Wolf
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] zaptel on CENTOS servercd

2007-06-04 Thread Jim Suber
I use CentOS4.4. successfully. I do something which is very odd for a Linux
admin. I do a install everything. There is/was a reason for this.
I was in a hurry to get a system online and didn't have time for a research
project. I wrote a simple shell script to compile the apps (zaptel, libpri,
asterisk),copy pre-defined .confs to asterisk -udev zaptel etc., set up
vsftpd for provisioning up to 20 Polycom phones, set up DHCPD and finally
the script removes a list of un-needed services left over from install
everything The list of un-needed services continues to grow as I learn
more. I know you won't find this in anyone's Best Practices wiki but I've
used this process (install the os, run the script) 6 times for six different
systems. It works flawlessly everytime. Takes an average of 51 minutes to
get a complete system up and running.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 2:35 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel on CENTOS servercd

One comment if I may:

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+Linux+Centos does need some
cleanup. Let alone merging of the two separate procedures and an update.

Also:

On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 06:22:57PM -0400, Lee Jenkins wrote:
 Khaled Chehab wrote:
 I suffered a lot from installing zaptel 1.4.2 on centos servercd ,Sure 
 there
 is someone did that, Please in need to have the installation procedure
step
 by step. Its too urgent for me .
 
 Thanks alot 
 
 
 
 These scripts are working pretty well for me.  They are based on a 
 script I found on the wiki.
 
 # Script to download pre reqs for installation
 # ==
 
 #!/bin/bash
 
 rpm --import http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-4

Isn't this done by the installer?

 
 yum -y install kernel-source bison openssl-devel

Why do you need kernel-source?  I know it is fun do download some extra
40Gigs, but apart from that, the kernel-devel / kernel-smp-devel is all
you need to build zaptel. (likewise linux-headers-`uname -r` on 
Debian/Ubuntu )

 
 yum -y update
 
 # Use kernel-devel  instead of kernel-smp-devel
 # if not a SMP machine
 # |==|
   |  |
 yum -y install gcc kernel kernel-smp-devel bison openssl-devel

Hmmm you install kernel, but kernel-*smp*-devel . Strange
ocmbination.

Why not simply 'yum update' to get the latest kernel, if needed? This
will upgrade either 'kernel' or 'kernel-smp', depending on the installed
package.

If you don't need a kernel upgrade you don't need the following:

 
 shutdown -r now
 
 # end script
 
 
 
 
 # Script to download asterisk, etc and build/install
 # ==
 #!/bin/bash
 
 rm -f /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/*
 
 cd /usr/src
 rm -rf asterisk
 wget http://ftp.digium.com/pub/asterisk/releases/asterisk-1.2.18.tar.gz
 tar -zxvf asterisk-1.2.18.tar.gz
 mv asterisk-1.2.18 asterisk
 
 cd /usr/src
 rm -rf zaptel
 wget http://ftp.digium.com/pub/zaptel/releases/zaptel-1.2.17.1.tar.gz
 tar -zxvf zaptel-1.2.17.1.tar.gz
 mv zaptel-1.2.17.1 zaptel
 
 cd /usr/src
 rm -rf asterisk-addons
 wget 
 http://ftp.digium.com/pub/asterisk/releases/asterisk-addons-1.2.6.tar.gz
 tar -zxvf asterisk-addons-1.2.6.tar.gz
 mv asterisk-addons-1.2.6 asterisk-addons
 
 cd /usr/src
 rm -rf asterisk-sounds
 wget 
 http://ftp.digium.com/pub/asterisk/releases/asterisk-sounds-1.2.1.tar.gz
 tar -zxvf asterisk-sounds-1.2.1.tar.gz
 mv asterisk-sounds-1.2.1 asterisk-sounds
 
 
 cd /usr/src/zaptel
 make clean
 make install
 make config
 
 cd /usr/src/asterisk
 make clean
 make install
 make samples
 make config
 
 cd /usr/src/asterisk-addons
 make clean
 make install
 
 cd /usr/src/asterisk-sounds
 make install

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen   
icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] wifi sip phone real-world experiences?

2007-06-04 Thread Bryan Laird

Right now I can only speak to the WIP300 but

I've been evaluating it for about a week now and really I have to say  
I'm fairly pleased.  It works it works //well// but that's not to say  
it's perfect.


 - Physically the phone feels very light and cheap, that if you were  
to drop it that it might not survive very many of them.  The buttons  
feel more

like a toy than anything else but once you get beyond that it works.

- Address book storage is ok the interface from the phone is fairly  
standard for what you would see in a cell phone and adding entries  
isn't really
all that horrid of a task.  You can also add entries via the web  
interface which does make for an easier way to add several entries  
but the lack of

anything resembling a 'sync' function could be considered bothersome.

- Call quality, so far so good however, I do believe the unit has a  
bit of an over touchy MIC.. the quality is clear but but it seems to  
pick up background
noise and white noise pretty good.  That's not to say that it will  
drown out your voice but you will hear the background if your in a  
server or climate controlled room.


- The CPU on the phone does appear to be a bit underpowered.  Two  
devices right next to each-other one a PC soft-phone and one the WIP  
300 using the 'qualify' feature
in asterisk you can clearly see a different in latency and how long  
it takes for the wip300 to process some sip transactions.  This  
doesn't effect call quality but it is something

worth noting if I'm taking the time to write this out.

- Firmware: when you get the phone if it's running anything  1.0.9  
upgrade to the latest from linksys, there are a slew of bugs that  
existing the factory shipping version that will
likely make you think you really got cheated if you don't upgrade the  
firmware.  Although make a note of the earlier thread upgrading has  
some bugs too, and don't try it form a mac.


- I haven't tried the email function, as lack of intelligent keying  
(adaptive text for word completion) to me makes this a worthless  
feature.


- Wireless, actually after changing to the latest version I've been  
fairly happy with the range coverage and life of the unit.  You can  
load in multiple profiles for which AP
you are talking to and the phone will register with that profile.   
You can associate different AP's with different SIP accounts which  
could be handy for traveling offices.  The
documentation doesn't mention it but you can create a profile that's  
a wild-card which will cause the phone to register to any open AP it  
finds.  This I've  found works fairly
well as well as I can go from the east side to the west side of the  
building and the unit will switch AP's without much trouble, but do  
expect a dropped call in the process.


If you have a mesh setup then the drop shouldn't happen but that's  
another story all together.


I haven't played with the various encryption options so far as I've  
only been evaluating based on open access points.  My thought is that  
likely the encryption may show
more with the CPU load depending on how the unit manages this with  
it's chip set but even at that I don't think it will cause any red  
alarms.  I could be wrong though.


Last thing, one neat thing about the wip300 if you are adventurous is  
the fact that the firmware is under GPL... so if you really felt like  
it you could probably change the behavior of

the phone.


Anyway sorry for the long message but I felt like chiming in on  
this.  All in all I don't think it's a horrible phone I do however  
think it's over priced for what it is but not enough demand on

this type of device is always going to keep the price up in the air.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bryan Laird, Sr. Manager CM Operations
   -+-
Cablemodems are the gateway to the Internet.
The Internet is a gateway to some things that are  better left un-seen.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] IAX2 Trunk Problem

2007-06-04 Thread Arun Kumar

Hi

I've two boxes connected over IAX2 trunk but suddenly my cli is getting
flood with these messages:

iax2_trunk_queue: Maximum data space exceeded

and b'coz of that my agents are not able to hear any thing.

when this happened that time there were 9 calls.

my * version is 1.2.18 and 1.2.14

thanks

arun
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] G729 License

2007-06-04 Thread Arun Kumar

HI

I bought 20 license from Digium and install in my server and b'coz of some
problem I've to change my server is it possible that I can use those lice
and register again in my new server ?

Is  it possible that I'll be able to use those lice in my old box also ?

thanks
arun
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] wifi sip phone real-world experiences?

2007-06-04 Thread Bryan Laird


On Jun 4, 2007, at 8:31 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:


On Monday 04 June 2007 8:24 am, Bryan Laird wrote:

  - Physically the phone feels very light and cheap, that if you were
to drop it that it might not survive very many of them.  The buttons
feel more
like a toy than anything else but once you get beyond that it works.


How are they for big hands?  I'll have to do some checking around  
to see if I
can find a rubber case for it or something, it's all concrete  
floors here.




Considering I too have the sausage finger problem... the buttons are  
incredibly similar

to what you find on the Nokia candy bar style phones.





- Address book storage is ok the interface from the phone is fairly
standard for what you would see in a cell phone and adding entries
isn't really
all that horrid of a task.  You can also add entries via the web
interface which does make for an easier way to add several entries
but the lack of
anything resembling a 'sync' function could be considered bothersome.


Bugger.


Last thing, one neat thing about the wip300 if you are adventurous is
the fact that the firmware is under GPL... so if you really felt like
it you could probably change the behavior of
the phone.


This I was not aware of.  I will certainly evaluate this phone and  
it's bigger

brother.


Anyway sorry for the long message but I felt like chiming in on
this.  All in all I don't think it's a horrible phone I do however
think it's over priced for what it is but not enough demand on
this type of device is always going to keep the price up in the air.


Your message is *exactly* the kind of reply I was hoping to get.   
Thank you so
much for taking the time to write such a long response.  I truly  
appreciate

it.

-A.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bryan Laird, Sr. Manager CM Operations

   -+-
Cablemodems are the gateway to the Internet.
The Internet is a gateway to some things that are  better left un-seen.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] debug logs

2007-06-04 Thread ram

Hi

iam keep getting this log in my asterisk log

is this harm anything, and how can stop this, any suggestions



Jun  4 18:21:47 DEBUG[2093] chan_sip.c: Stopping retransmission on
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' of Request 102: Match Found
Jun  4 18:21:48 DEBUG[2173] manager.c: Manager received command 'Command'
Jun  4 18:21:48 DEBUG[2173] manager.c: Manager received command 'Command'
Jun  4 18:21:48 DEBUG[2173] manager.c: Manager received command 'Command'
Jun  4 18:21:49 DEBUG[2173] manager.c: Manager received command 'Command'
Jun  4 18:21:49 DEBUG[2173] manager.c: Manager received command 'Command'
Jun  4 18:21:50 DEBUG[2173] manager.c: Manager received command 'Command'

ram
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] G729 License

2007-06-04 Thread olivier.taylor




you can register twice
after that you'll have to explain the reasons of changes to Digium

Olivier

Arun Kumar a crit:
HI
  
  
I bought 20 license from Digium and install in my server and b'coz of
some
  
problem I've to change my server is it possible that I can use those
lice
  
and register again in my new server ?
  
  
Is it possible that I'll be able to use those lice in my old box also
?
  
  
thanks
  
arun
  
  
  

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel on CENTOS servercd

2007-06-04 Thread John Novack



Jim Suber wrote:

I use CentOS4.4. successfully. I do something which is very odd for a Linux
admin. I do a install everything. There is/was a reason for this.
I was in a hurry to get a system online and didn't have time for a research
project. I wrote a simple shell script to compile the apps (zaptel, libpri,
asterisk),copy pre-defined .confs to asterisk -udev zaptel etc., set up
vsftpd for provisioning up to 20 Polycom phones, set up DHCPD and finally
the script removes a list of un-needed services left over from install
everything The list of un-needed services continues to grow as I learn
more. I know you won't find this in anyone's Best Practices wiki but I've
used this process (install the os, run the script) 6 times for six different
systems. It works flawlessly everytime. Takes an average of 51 minutes to
get a complete system up and running.

  

As a Linux novice, I certainly agree.
I posted such some time ago and was castigated for such blasphemy, but 
as you have discovered, this is certainly  a quick way to get up and 
running.

Use the 3 CD set rather than the single server CD and it goes MUCH quicker.
Even quicker is to clone the hard drive then go change the few items 
that need changing. I have found that works well.
Install everything then turn off services one doesn't need works well 
for both CentOs 3.x and 4.x, though Asterisk 1.4 seems to NEED the 
version 4.

Any experience with CentOS 5??
Of course there are always the ( fill in the blank ) OS bigots that 
insist on using their favorite, and end up with problems.

There are those who Linux is simply a means to an end, and not a religion!

John Novack

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] G729 License

2007-06-04 Thread ram

On 6/4/07, Arun Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


HI

I bought 20 license from Digium and install in my server and b'coz of some
problem I've to change my server is it possible that I can use those lice
and register again in my new server ?

Is  it possible that I'll be able to use those lice in my old box also ?




Hi

no its bound to ethernet address, when you change ethernet
you need to register again with support of digium

its only use for one Server

ram

thanks

arun

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com http://easynews.com/--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] CDR timing

2007-06-04 Thread Steve Murphy
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 15:44 -0500, Rob Schall wrote:
 A simple question but one I can't seem to find easily...
 
 I have 90 or so DIDs. For all outbound calls, I edit the callerid so
 that it will always read out main line's number. This poses a problem
 though, because the CDR detail isn't written until after everything is
 done. So when you look at the detail, the number you are calling is over
 written with this new caller id for some reason.
 
 Any thoughts how to better get an accurate reading of the calls, or
 another way to mask the caller id?
 
 Rob


 Rob--

You've left out some details, like where the callerid info you want to
see is stored. Every channel keeps track of ani, rdnis, and dnid as
well, and depending on the driver, usually only the ani or the plain
callerid name/num end up in the CDR records.

In the dialplan, you can attach other info onto a CDR by setting, for
example, the CDR userfield, to one of these values, and hopefully, you
can get this info out into a CDR so you can arrange your billing info
accordingly...

Also, keep in mind that the CDR is a separate data structure, and only
gets updated at certain times, and you are only allowed to set certain
fields via dialplan funcs. (and the CID info isn't on that list!).


murf


-- 
Steve Murphy
Software Developer
Digium


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] zaptel on CENTOS servercd

2007-06-04 Thread Lee Jenkins

Tzafrir Cohen wrote:

One comment if I may:

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+Linux+Centos does need some
cleanup. Let alone merging of the two separate procedures and an update.

Also:

On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 06:22:57PM -0400, Lee Jenkins wrote:

Khaled Chehab wrote:
I suffered a lot from installing zaptel 1.4.2 on centos servercd ,Sure 
there

is someone did that, Please in need to have the installation procedure step
by step. Its too urgent for me .

Thanks alot 



These scripts are working pretty well for me.  They are based on a 
script I found on the wiki.


# Script to download pre reqs for installation
# ==

#!/bin/bash

rpm --import http://mirror.centos.org/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-4


Isn't this done by the installer?


I don't think so because the scripts (yum) would fail without it.  I'm 
using Centos 4.4 final if it makes a difference.



yum -y install kernel-source bison openssl-devel


Why do you need kernel-source?  I know it is fun do download some extra
40Gigs, but apart from that, the kernel-devel / kernel-smp-devel is all
you need to build zaptel. (likewise linux-headers-`uname -r` on 
Debian/Ubuntu )




Frankly, I am just following a script that I found on the wiki and I'm 
pretty new to linux still.


http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+Linux+Centos


yum -y update

# Use kernel-devel  instead of kernel-smp-devel
# if not a SMP machine
# |==|
  |  |
yum -y install gcc kernel kernel-smp-devel bison openssl-devel


Hmmm you install kernel, but kernel-*smp*-devel . Strange
ocmbination.

Why not simply 'yum update' to get the latest kernel, if needed? This
will upgrade either 'kernel' or 'kernel-smp', depending on the installed
package.

If you don't need a kernel upgrade you don't need the following:


shutdown -r now

# end script



Thanks for the critique, Tzafrir.  I will make these changes and try 
them out.



--

Warm Regards,

Lee



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Loud noise instead of MOH

2007-06-04 Thread Lee Jenkins
Gang Chen wrote:
 - Original Message - From: Mauro Zanin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 12:32 PM
 Subject: [asterisk-users] Loud noise instead of MOH
 
 
 Hi Everybody,
 I'm experiencing this kind of issue.
 One ASTERISK 1.2.17 is connected to a Bristuffed HFC single ISDN 
 channel card. Everything seems to work but sometimes the third party 
 caller when listening to MOH listens some SSH! instead of MOH, 
 this is not continuos, MOH plays ok for, say, 20 seconds then the 
 sound and then another 30 seconds of good MOH.
 We have some SIP phones for extensions (Grandstream 496 ATA and One 
 SPX2000).
 Sometimes also ATAs hung, not really got ATAs at all.

 Does Anybody have some hint?

 Ciao a tutti
 Mauro


 Use native format .wav to play your moh instead of .mp3 may solve your 
 problem.
 ___

This page may be of interest:

http://astrecipes.net/?n=152

-- 

Warm Regards,

Lee



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] wifi sip phone real-world experiences?

2007-06-04 Thread Zoa

Gordon Henderson wrote:

On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:


On Sunday 03 June 2007 4:30 pm, Alex Crow wrote:

No frills, specs look good, price seems excellent!
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/ProductInfo.asp?WebProductID=369519


That's a terrible phone.  I've tried them.  the screen is pretty much 
useless,

the buttons are *TINY*, the battery life horrible, and the ringtones
gimmicky.


I have to disagree on at least one point here - Battery life. I don't 
think 3 or 4 days standby and several hours of talk time makes for a 
horrible battery life.


The F1000G has other faillings, but battery life isn't one of them!

If you compare this battery life to a decent DECT phone, it's still 
miserable.
I'm used to these dect phones : 
http://www.bang-olufsen.com/UserFiles/File/Products/Technical%20Specifications/BeoCom6000_en.pdf



I haven't tried WEP or WPA on these things, but the phones I've 
gotten rid of long ago due to their problems.


Mine works with both WEP and WPA. It just occasionally won't re-attach 
to an access point (iwthout rebooting) and won't roam between access 
points at all.


I think for the cost (and you can get them cheaper than from Scan!) 
they're not bad, but still in the experimental/toy category than 
something I'd deploy to clients.


Gordon
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Wireless IP Phone with external Telephone Book

2007-06-04 Thread Gordon Henderson

On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Tobias Wolf wrote:


Hi,

we are searching for wireless IP Phones (DECT preferred) with have an
solution for an external telephone book. We don't want to enter all of
our numbers into every telephone, but have one location for all the
numbers and every phone looks them up there, e.g. an ldap server.

We have tried Kirk but they are working on an solution without any
information when it will be available.

Does anyone knows an vendor which supports this feature ?


Since you're using them with asterisk (this is the asterisk-users list 
after-all :), why not implement it in asterisk? Asterisk even has the 
voice prompts already for it too, so someone's obviously though about it 
in the past...


And this is exactly what I do in my systems, and the beauty is that it's 
completely phone independant. You could have DECT phones, desk phones, WiFi 
phones, soft phones, etc. all sharing the same phone-book.


Sure, it's not as neat as an in-phone solution (you can't easilly scroll 
through the list on the phone), but it's universal over all phone types.


I implement a per-extension phone book, and a system phone book which 
everyone has. And with a web interface, you can associate a name to the 
number, then incoming caller-id works too, as long as the phone has a good 
display.


Heres a working example from some old code I wrote - which I'm sure I got 
off a web page (or the book) once upon a time in the past. (The list 
commands here won't work with Siemens SIP/DECT phones as they won't let 
you dial a trailling star, it's a # in the latest incarnation) This is 
only 10 numbers per phone, but it's easy to change for more (eg. *000 
through *099 for personal ones, or *100 through *199 for system ones - 
left as an excercise to the reader ;-)


Gordon


;==
; Personal speed-dial:
;   Let the user assign a personal speed dial code
;   From *00 through *09
;==

;Setup: *0 then a single digit 0-9 then the phone number to store at that 
location


exten = _*0X.,1,Answer()
exten = _*0X.,n,Set(me=${CALLERID(num)})
exten = _*0X.,n,Set(pos=${EXTEN:2:1})
exten = _*0X.,n,Set(num=${EXTEN:3})
exten = _*0X.,n,Set(DB(${me}/sd${pos})=${num})
exten = _*0X.,n,SayDigits(${num})
exten = _*0X.,n,playback(at)
exten = _*0X.,n,playback(position)
exten = _*0X.,n,SendText(*0${pos}=${num})
exten = _*0X.,n,SayDigits(${pos})
exten = _*0X.,n,Macro(starAck)

;List:  *0X*

exten = _*0X*,1,Answer()
exten = _*0X*,n,Set(me=${CALLERID(num)})
exten = _*0X*,n,Set(pos=${EXTEN:2:1})
exten = _*0X*,n,Set(num=${DB(${me}/sd${pos})})
exten = _*0X*,n,GotoIf(${num}?:noNum)
exten = _*0X*,n,SendText(*0${pos}=${num})
exten = _*0X*,n,SayDigits(${num})
exten = _*0X*,n,playback(at)
exten = _*0X*,n,playback(position)
exten = _*0X*,n,SayDigits(0${pos})
exten = _*0X*,n,Hangup()
exten = _*0X*,n(noNum),playback(that-number)
exten = _*0X*,n,playback(is-not-in-the)
exten = _*0X*,n,playback(speed-dial)
exten = _*0X*,n,playback(system)
exten = _*0X*,n,Hangup()

;Recall and dial:   *0X

exten = _*0X,1,Answer()
exten = _*0X,n,Set(me=${CALLERID(num)})
exten = _*0X,n,Set(pos=${EXTEN:2:1})
exten = _*0X,n,Set(num=${DB(${me}/sd${pos})})
exten = _*0X,n,GotoIf(${num}?:noNum)
exten = _*0X,n,SendText(Calling: ${num})
exten = _*0X,n,Goto(${num},1)
exten = _*0X,n(noNum),playback(that-number)
exten = _*0X,n,playback(is-not-in-the)
exten = _*0X,n,playback(speed-dial)
exten = _*0X,n,playback(system)
exten = _*0X,n,Hangup()


Gordon
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] CDR timing

2007-06-04 Thread Rob Schall
Our call detail is located in 2 places. The master.csv file and in a
mysql database. All outbound calls have:
exten = _91NXXNXX,1,Set(CALLERID(all)=000-000-)
 (the zeros being our number)

Right after that, it moves to the Dial command. The problem we are
seeing, is in both the csv file and the mysql database, the src and clid
are set to our main line's number. I need to to read the correct src. I
don't care what the clid says.

Rob

Steve Murphy wrote:
 On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 15:44 -0500, Rob Schall wrote:
   
 A simple question but one I can't seem to find easily...

 I have 90 or so DIDs. For all outbound calls, I edit the callerid so
 that it will always read out main line's number. This poses a problem
 though, because the CDR detail isn't written until after everything is
 done. So when you look at the detail, the number you are calling is over
 written with this new caller id for some reason.

 Any thoughts how to better get an accurate reading of the calls, or
 another way to mask the caller id?

 Rob
 


  Rob--

 You've left out some details, like where the callerid info you want to
 see is stored. Every channel keeps track of ani, rdnis, and dnid as
 well, and depending on the driver, usually only the ani or the plain
 callerid name/num end up in the CDR records.

 In the dialplan, you can attach other info onto a CDR by setting, for
 example, the CDR userfield, to one of these values, and hopefully, you
 can get this info out into a CDR so you can arrange your billing info
 accordingly...

 Also, keep in mind that the CDR is a separate data structure, and only
 gets updated at certain times, and you are only allowed to set certain
 fields via dialplan funcs. (and the CID info isn't on that list!).


 murf


   
 

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] wifi sip phone real-world experiences?

2007-06-04 Thread Alban
Hi,
I've tested several wifi phone (UtStarcom, Hitachi 3000 and 5000, and one 
Siemens). The Siemens is the best one, for a really cheaper price than 
hitachi. And was the only one which roams well between AP (same SSID, same 
channel) with WPA. Battery is still a problem, especially if the coverture is 
not very good everywhere. But that was the best one I could test... The 
reference is : Gigaset SL75 WLAN.
Hope it helps
Alban


Le Lundi 4 Juin 2007 14:53, Bryan Laird a écrit :
 On Jun 4, 2007, at 8:31 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
  On Monday 04 June 2007 8:24 am, Bryan Laird wrote:
- Physically the phone feels very light and cheap, that if you were
  to drop it that it might not survive very many of them.  The buttons
  feel more
  like a toy than anything else but once you get beyond that it works.
 
  How are they for big hands?  I'll have to do some checking around
  to see if I
  can find a rubber case for it or something, it's all concrete
  floors here.

 Considering I too have the sausage finger problem... the buttons are
 incredibly similar
 to what you find on the Nokia candy bar style phones.

  - Address book storage is ok the interface from the phone is fairly
  standard for what you would see in a cell phone and adding entries
  isn't really
  all that horrid of a task.  You can also add entries via the web
  interface which does make for an easier way to add several entries
  but the lack of
  anything resembling a 'sync' function could be considered bothersome.
 
  Bugger.
 
  Last thing, one neat thing about the wip300 if you are adventurous is
  the fact that the firmware is under GPL... so if you really felt like
  it you could probably change the behavior of
  the phone.
 
  This I was not aware of.  I will certainly evaluate this phone and
  it's bigger
  brother.
 
  Anyway sorry for the long message but I felt like chiming in on
  this.  All in all I don't think it's a horrible phone I do however
  think it's over priced for what it is but not enough demand on
  this type of device is always going to keep the price up in the air.
 
  Your message is *exactly* the kind of reply I was hoping to get.
  Thank you so
  much for taking the time to write such a long response.  I truly
  appreciate
  it.
 
  -A.
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 Bryan Laird, Sr. Manager CM Operations

 -+-
 Cablemodems are the gateway to the Internet.
 The Internet is a gateway to some things that are  better left un-seen.


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] addqueuemember recording and reporting problems

2007-06-04 Thread Jordan Novak
I am having a difficult time with the transition from agentcallback
login...
Here are a few of the isssues, I am logging in using chan_ local
ie:local/8000 as the extension
 
Call Detail records no longer show agent/ as the dstchannel
show agents no longer shows the channels state
show queues does not show the member
 
Can anybody help? I have a ton of time invested in applications I
developed that rely on this.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Re: click to call

2007-06-04 Thread Anton Krall
Steven

Have you been able to custommized the interface for babar's iax solution?
 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven
Sent: Lunes, 04 de Junio de 2007 07:17 a.m.
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Re: click to call

I am using the free
http://www.babarnazmi.citril.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7sid=fd8047cffb13074
969d3418064f4eb31
It is working as you described.

It appears to be working well.

-- 
-- 
Steven

http://www.glimasoutheast.org



Anton Krall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The idea is to put some kind of embedded app on the website so customers
with mics can just click an icon or image and connect to our sales people or
customer support staff...

So far for what I've seen, there is some misconception of the terms.. click
to dial can mean if you see a number on a webpage, click on it and your
softphone will dial it.. but can also mean click on the image and it will
connect you to the sales people, for example.

I'm looking for the latter.




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mail-lists
Sent: Jueves, 31 de Mayo de 2007 10:18 a.m.
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] click to call

Anton Krall wrote:
 I have been looking around for examples or code on making a click to call
 application for web sites... has anybody had any luck on this topic? Is
 there any open source code out ther that could do this?

What we have done in the past is created url's like this : sip:4044565941.

Xlite will register itself as the sip handler on your system.

If you want a generic click to call (ability to call numbers on any
given website) check out moziax
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users







 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] yum om centos

2007-06-04 Thread Khaled Chehab
A lot of dependencies required for each module, I don't know the sequence of
the rpms.Any way to know that. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jaswinder
Singh
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 4:51 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] yum om centos

independently install each rpm via rpm command :-/

On 04/06/07, Khaled Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




 I have 2 servers, one connected to internet and the other is on a private
 lan have no access to internet.

 On the first server I update the kernel by yum update

 And installed asterisk prerequisite module

 yum install gcc gcc-c++ compat-gcc-32 compat-gcc-32-c++ autoconf \ libtool
 make automake automake14 automake15 automake16 automake17 \ bison byacc
flex
 libtermcap libtermcap-devel newt newt-devel \ ncurses ncurses-devel
 openssl-devel zlib zlib-devel krb5-devel





 I zipped /var/cache/yum from the first server and extract it on the second
 server at the same directory.



 On the second server I tried to update using

 yum update

  but the yum update failed.





 How can I do that with out connecting the second server to internet .







 Khaled

 Regards





  
  *
  No employee or agent is authorized to conclude
 any binding agreement on behalf of
 Xplorium with another party by e-mail
 without express written confirmation by an
 officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by
 an individual in this electronic message
 do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium
 or its subsidiaries and associates.

  This electronic message and its attachments are
 solely addressed to the addressee(s), and
 contain confidential information protected
 from disclosure belonging to Xplorium.

  If you are not the intended addressee of this
 electronic message and its attachments,
 kindly delete it immediately from your system and
 notify the sender by electronic mail. You
 must not copy this message or attachment
 or disclose its content to any other
 person.

  Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this
 electronic message and any of its
 attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses
 or other defects.
  *


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



*
No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf 
of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation 
by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual in this 
electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or its 
subsidiaries and associates.

This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed to the 
addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from disclosure 
belonging to Xplorium.

If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message and its 
attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and notify the 
sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or attachment or 
disclose its content to any other person.

Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic message and any of 
its attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses or other defects.
*


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] wifi sip phone real-world experiences?

2007-06-04 Thread Paul Hayes

Zoa wrote:

Gordon Henderson wrote:

On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:


On Sunday 03 June 2007 4:30 pm, Alex Crow wrote:

No frills, specs look good, price seems excellent!
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/ProductInfo.asp?WebProductID=369519


That's a terrible phone.  I've tried them.  the screen is pretty much 
useless,

the buttons are *TINY*, the battery life horrible, and the ringtones
gimmicky.


I have to disagree on at least one point here - Battery life. I don't 
think 3 or 4 days standby and several hours of talk time makes for a 
horrible battery life.


The F1000G has other faillings, but battery life isn't one of them!

If you compare this battery life to a decent DECT phone, it's still 
miserable.
I'm used to these dect phones : 
http://www.bang-olufsen.com/UserFiles/File/Products/Technical%20Specifications/BeoCom6000_en.pdf 




[snip]

It's not really a fair comparison though, DECT was designed from the 
offset to be used with portable phones on low-power batteries.  Wifi was 
never designed for this so it's comparatively power hungry.  The F1000G 
in my opinion is still pretty good battery life for a wifi phone, I've 
seen some that will not last a day in standby.


Looking at the OP's requirements list in the first post, there is 
nothing currently on the market which will cover anything like all those 
features (and do it well!).


I've currently got several Nokia Wifi/GSM phones sat on my desk, they 
are difficult to configure and very quirky, frankly not even good enough 
to be considered a techie's toy.  I am told 3rd party softphone 
clients such as TruPhone work a lot better than the built-in SIP client 
but I'm yet to test any of these.  The main problem is they have a habit 
of constantly losing connection with my access points.  Even the F1000G 
and F3000 phones I have here don't do that.


I'm yet to be convinced that wifi in it's current state is any use for 
telephony at all.  DECT works so much better, it just needs someone to 
make a fully functioning SIP DECT phone.  The Siemens is good but they 
need to work on more SIP functions, although proper transfers should be 
possible soon.


I also have some Philips DECT SIP equipment next to my desk to look at 
when I've got a chance!


cheers,
Paul.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] FX Dialing Odd

2007-06-04 Thread Rob Schall
Here's a possible bug, or more likely, I'm just missing something.

We have a pots card in one of our asterisk boxes. Its a simple asterisk
setup with one FXO/FXS card and basic static extensions file, etc. When
we dial out over the pots line, 4 out of 5 times, it will work. However,
every 4 or 5 times, we get an error back from the provider that says
The number you have dialed. blah blah blah. The interesting there
there, is that the number it quotes us, adds our local area code in
front of it. And this only seems to happen on long distance context
numbers. So when we dial 630-XXX-, sometimes we are sent to
312-681-XXX-.

Here's our configs:
zaptel.conf
loadzone=us
defaultzone=us
fxoks=1-2
fxsks=3

zapata.conf
[trunkgroups]

[channels]

language=en
context=internal

usecallerid=yes
hidecallerid=no
callwaiting=yes
usecallingpres=yes
callwaitingcallerid=yes
threewaycalling=yes
transfer=yes
cancallforward=yes
callreturn=yes
echocancel=yes
callgroup=1
pickupgroup=1
immediate=no

;define channels
context=internal
signalling=fxo_ks
channel = 1-2

context=zapchans
signalling=fxs_ks
group=1
channel = 3

extensions.conf
[general]
static=yes
writeprotect=no
clearglobalvars=no priorityjumping=no

[globals]
CONSOLE=Console/dsp ; Console interface for demo
;TRUNK=Zap/g1   ; Trunk interface
TRUNK=Zap/3 ; Trunk interface
TRUNKMSD=1  ; MSD digits to strip
(usually 1 or 0)

[trunkint]
exten = _9011.,1,Macro(dundi-e164,${EXTEN:4})
exten = _9011.,n,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}})

[trunkld]
exten = _91NXXNXX,1,Verbose(LD)
exten = _91NXXNXX,n,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}},,wW)
exten = _91NXXNXX,n,Hangup()

[trunklocal]
exten = _9NXX,1,Verbose(LOCAL)
exten = _9NXX,n,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}},,wW)
exten = _9NXX,n,Hangup()

[trunktollfree]
exten = _91800NXX,1,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}})
exten = _91888NXX,1,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}})
exten = _91877NXX,1,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}})
exten = _91866NXX,1,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}})

[outgoing]
include = trunklocal
include = trunktollfree
include = trunkld

;ZAP Channels
[zapchans]
exten = 3,1,Dial(ZAP/1-1)
exten = 3,2,Hangup()
exten = 4,1,Dial(ZAP/2-1)
exten = 4,2,Hangup()

exten = s,1,Answer()
exten = s,2,NoOp(${CHANNEL:4:1})
exten = s,3,Goto(${CHANNEL:4:1},1)
exten = s,4,Hangup()

[incoming]
include =internal

[internal]
include = outgoing

exten = ,1,Dial(Zap/3/1630XXX,,wW)
exten = ,2,Hangup()



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] background dialing

2007-06-04 Thread Thomas Stein
Hello.

Is it possible to dial in background 2 or more different numbers while the 
same uninterrupted soundfile is playing? Something like this:

exten = Answer
exten = Playback (hello-bla-bla-we are trying to connect you-play-music)
exten = Dial (SIP110/15 and after 15s DIAL SIP111 without interrupt the 
Playback-Music)

Is that possible? Thank you in advance.

regards
t.
-- 
knowledgeTools®  ... managing complexity.
--
knowledgeTools International GmbH 
Wallstraße 15 / 15 a 
10179 Berlin 

Fon: +49 30 726 169 20
Fax: +49 30 726 169 249 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
www.knowledgetools.de 

Sitz  Berlin, AG Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 86378 
Geschäftsführer: Oliver Seyboldt, Reinhard Kunz
--

This eMail communication (and any attachment/s) may contain confidential or 
privileged information and is intended only for the individual(s) or entity 
named above and to others who have been specifically authorized to receive 
it. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or 
disclose the contents of this communication to others. Please notify the 
sender that you have received this e-mail in error by reply e-mail, and 
delete the e-mail subsequently. Thank you.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] any codec passthru mode

2007-06-04 Thread Jaswinder Singh

Asterisk by default uses the codec preferred by other device/client  .
Asterisk 1.2 ( dunno abt 1.4 specifically)  is not intelligent enough
to check if it can avoid transcoding by forcing same codec on other
side of conversation . If both sides prefer g729 then asterisk does
not do transcoding but if one side prefer gsm and other prefers g729
and the gsm side can also support g729 still asterisk will transcode .
Someone posted a patch to this in mantis bug tracking system at digium
for 1.2 .. google for it and maybe you can find  .

On 31/05/07, Rizwan Hisham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Does anybody has any documentation on codec negotiation within asterisk?

Well im using free g729 codec for testing purposes. i mentioned g729 just as
an example. whatever codec is mentioned in user perefernce, asterisk uses
ulaw to throw out the call.


On 5/30/07, Marco Mouta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 so you r sure you have g729 licences installed and ur * is transcoding
your RTP streaming?

 Test the work flow with disallow=all and allow=g729, can be my mistake but
I remember to read somewhere on the net any issue about codec negotiating
precedence when you use allow=all.

 good luck



 On 5/30/07, Rizwan Hisham  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hi all,
  My configuration is:
  USER (connects to) ASTERISK---(connects to)---CARRIER-OUT
 
  i want the user preffered codec to pass thru asterisk to carrier-out.
what i mean is:
  USER (user uses g729) ASTERISK---(asterisk should use g729 for
dialing out)---CARRIER-OUT
 
  instead, this is what happens
  USER (user uses g729) ASTERISK---(asterisk uses
g711u)---CARRIER-OUT
 
  How can i force asterisk to use user preffered codec for dialing out so
that my asterisk machine saves time by no conversion
  USER PREFERENCE IS
  disallow=all
  allow=g729
 
  CARRIER PREFERENCE IS
  allow=all
 
  Anybody who can help?
 
  --
  Rizwan Hisham
  Software Engineer
  AXVOICE Inc.
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 



 --
 Esta mensagem (incluindo quaisquer anexos) pode conter informação
confidencial para uso exclusivo do destinatário. Se não for o destinatário
pretendido, não deverá usar, distribuir ou copiar este e-mail. Se recebeu
esta mensagem por engano, por favor informe o emissor e elimine-a
imediatamente. Obrigado.

 This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
proprietary, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
you believe you have received this message in error, please advise the
sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you.
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





--
Rizwan Hisham
Software Engineer
AXVOICE Inc.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] FX Dialing Odd

2007-06-04 Thread John Novack



Rob Schall wrote:

Here's a possible bug, or more likely, I'm just missing something.

We have a pots card in one of our asterisk boxes. Its a simple asterisk setup with one FXO/FXS card and basic static extensions file, etc. When we dial out over the pots line, 4 out of 5 times, it will work. However,every 4 or 5 times, we get an error back from the provider that says The number you have dialed. blah blah blah. 

Common defect in the Zaptel driver.
It does NOT listen for dial tone, so if you have not inserted a w or 
three into the dial string, it will dial before the Central Office is 
ready, and it may miss a digit, causing misdials.


Curious that cheap modems years ago learned to listen for dial tone, 
but  the Zaptel driver doesn't, and of course this is considered a 
feature request rather than a bug, and no one seems to want to fix it.


John Novack

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] wifi sip phone real-world experiences?

2007-06-04 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Monday 04 June 2007 10:28 am, Paul Hayes wrote:
 Looking at the OP's requirements list in the first post, there is
 nothing currently on the market which will cover anything like all those
 features (and do it well!).

I've got the WIP300 and 330 on my list, with the latter being the more likely 
candidate, as I can throw up custom apps once I figure out how it's 
done.  :-)  I like the idea of a wifi phone running Linux though, so both of 
these options will have to be investigated.

 but I'm yet to test any of these.  The main problem is they have a habit
 of constantly losing connection with my access points.  Even the F1000G
 and F3000 phones I have here don't do that.

My F1000G phones *CONSTANTLY* lost connection with my WRT54, and it had 
nothing to do with signal strength, as the access point was less than 10 feet 
away from my desk, with nothing between to interfere.  :-(

 I'm yet to be convinced that wifi in it's current state is any use for
 telephony at all.  DECT works so much better, it just needs someone to
 make a fully functioning SIP DECT phone.  The Siemens is good but they
 need to work on more SIP functions, although proper transfers should be
 possible soon.

I am also slowly coming to this conclusion.  Polycom recently acquired 
SpectraLink, who've got many years in the wireless phone business.  They've 
got both Wifi and DECT offerings, but nothing with bluetooth, so the search 
continues.  :-)

-A.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] ringback detection

2007-06-04 Thread Jaswinder Singh

It just might be that your carrier is not sending ring . You can use
'r' in asterisk dial command in extensions.conf to generate ring from
asterisk .

On 31/05/07, dima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello, everyone.
Could anyone explain me how does ringback detection works in asterisk.
Sometimes, when making a call, my asterisk box doesn't detect a ringback
and I just hear silence until the other party picks up the phone. I've
checked the SIP messages and they are ok (I'm getting 183 session in
progress), so I guess I should be debugging the RTP packets. From then
on I'm stuck. Does anyone know what type of packets I should be looking
for?

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] any codec passthru mode

2007-06-04 Thread SIP

That just seems really, REALLY dumb for a program of this magnitude.

I know this has been patched here and there by one person or another, 
but does anyone know if any of these patches to make CODEC negotiation 
actually, you know, negotiate a CODEC will ever make it into the core src?



Jaswinder Singh wrote:

Asterisk by default uses the codec preferred by other device/client  .
Asterisk 1.2 ( dunno abt 1.4 specifically)  is not intelligent enough
to check if it can avoid transcoding by forcing same codec on other
side of conversation . If both sides prefer g729 then asterisk does
not do transcoding but if one side prefer gsm and other prefers g729
and the gsm side can also support g729 still asterisk will transcode .
Someone posted a patch to this in mantis bug tracking system at digium
for 1.2 .. google for it and maybe you can find  .

On 31/05/07, Rizwan Hisham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Does anybody has any documentation on codec negotiation within asterisk?

Well im using free g729 codec for testing purposes. i mentioned g729 
just as
an example. whatever codec is mentioned in user perefernce, asterisk 
uses

ulaw to throw out the call.


On 5/30/07, Marco Mouta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 so you r sure you have g729 licences installed and ur * is transcoding
your RTP streaming?

 Test the work flow with disallow=all and allow=g729, can be my 
mistake but
I remember to read somewhere on the net any issue about codec 
negotiating

precedence when you use allow=all.

 good luck



 On 5/30/07, Rizwan Hisham  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hi all,
  My configuration is:
  USER (connects to) ASTERISK---(connects to)---CARRIER-OUT
 
  i want the user preffered codec to pass thru asterisk to 
carrier-out.

what i mean is:
  USER (user uses g729) ASTERISK---(asterisk should use 
g729 for

dialing out)---CARRIER-OUT
 
  instead, this is what happens
  USER (user uses g729) ASTERISK---(asterisk uses
g711u)---CARRIER-OUT
 
  How can i force asterisk to use user preffered codec for dialing 
out so

that my asterisk machine saves time by no conversion
  USER PREFERENCE IS
  disallow=all
  allow=g729
 
  CARRIER PREFERENCE IS
  allow=all
 
  Anybody who can help?
 
  --
  Rizwan Hisham
  Software Engineer
  AXVOICE Inc.
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 



 --
 Esta mensagem (incluindo quaisquer anexos) pode conter informação
confidencial para uso exclusivo do destinatário. Se não for o 
destinatário
pretendido, não deverá usar, distribuir ou copiar este e-mail. Se 
recebeu

esta mensagem por engano, por favor informe o emissor e elimine-a
imediatamente. Obrigado.

 This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
proprietary, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If

you believe you have received this message in error, please advise the
sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you.
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





--
Rizwan Hisham
Software Engineer
AXVOICE Inc.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] wifi sip phone real-world experiences?

2007-06-04 Thread Alex Crow
Alban,

Thanks! Where on earth did you source this? I can't seen to find hide
nor hair of it here in the UK :(

Alex

On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 16:01 +0200, Alban wrote:
 Hi,
 I've tested several wifi phone (UtStarcom, Hitachi 3000 and 5000, and one 
 Siemens). The Siemens is the best one, for a really cheaper price than 
 hitachi. And was the only one which roams well between AP (same SSID, same 
 channel) with WPA. Battery is still a problem, especially if the coverture is 
 not very good everywhere. But that was the best one I could test... The 
 reference is : Gigaset SL75 WLAN.
 Hope it helps
 Alban
 
 
 Le Lundi 4 Juin 2007 14:53, Bryan Laird a écrit :
  On Jun 4, 2007, at 8:31 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
   On Monday 04 June 2007 8:24 am, Bryan Laird wrote:
 - Physically the phone feels very light and cheap, that if you were
   to drop it that it might not survive very many of them.  The buttons
   feel more
   like a toy than anything else but once you get beyond that it works.
  
   How are they for big hands?  I'll have to do some checking around
   to see if I
   can find a rubber case for it or something, it's all concrete
   floors here.
 
  Considering I too have the sausage finger problem... the buttons are
  incredibly similar
  to what you find on the Nokia candy bar style phones.
 
   - Address book storage is ok the interface from the phone is fairly
   standard for what you would see in a cell phone and adding entries
   isn't really
   all that horrid of a task.  You can also add entries via the web
   interface which does make for an easier way to add several entries
   but the lack of
   anything resembling a 'sync' function could be considered bothersome.
  
   Bugger.
  
   Last thing, one neat thing about the wip300 if you are adventurous is
   the fact that the firmware is under GPL... so if you really felt like
   it you could probably change the behavior of
   the phone.
  
   This I was not aware of.  I will certainly evaluate this phone and
   it's bigger
   brother.
  
   Anyway sorry for the long message but I felt like chiming in on
   this.  All in all I don't think it's a horrible phone I do however
   think it's over priced for what it is but not enough demand on
   this type of device is always going to keep the price up in the air.
  
   Your message is *exactly* the kind of reply I was hoping to get.
   Thank you so
   much for taking the time to write such a long response.  I truly
   appreciate
   it.
  
   -A.
   ___
   --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
  
   asterisk-users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
  -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
  Bryan Laird, Sr. Manager CM Operations
 
  -+-
  Cablemodems are the gateway to the Internet.
  The Internet is a gateway to some things that are  better left un-seen.
 
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] debug logs

2007-06-04 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:34:37PM +0530, ram wrote:
 Hi
 
 iam keep getting this log in my asterisk log
 
 is this harm anything, and how can stop this, any suggestions
 
 
 
 Jun  4 18:21:47 DEBUG[2093] chan_sip.c: Stopping retransmission on
 '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' of Request 102: Match Found
 Jun  4 18:21:48 DEBUG[2173] manager.c: Manager received command 'Command'
 Jun  4 18:21:48 DEBUG[2173] manager.c: Manager received command 'Command'
 Jun  4 18:21:48 DEBUG[2173] manager.c: Manager received command 'Command'
 Jun  4 18:21:49 DEBUG[2173] manager.c: Manager received command 'Command'
 Jun  4 18:21:49 DEBUG[2173] manager.c: Manager received command 'Command'
 Jun  4 18:21:50 DEBUG[2173] manager.c: Manager received command 'Command'

Those are debug logs. They are supposed to be full of debug messages. No
point in getting excited over them.

Specifically the manager interface command Command allows running CLI
commands.

This notifies you that it has been used (IIRC).


-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen   
icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] FX Dialing Odd

2007-06-04 Thread Rob Schall
But if this was the case, then why would the message playback (from the
provider) read back the digits from the start. I mean, I dialed
630-XXX-XXX and it reads back 312 (my local area code)-630-XXX-X

I would think if it wasn't waiting, then it would do like a 312-30X-XX-XX

Rob


John Novack wrote:


 Rob Schall wrote:
 Here's a possible bug, or more likely, I'm just missing something.

 We have a pots card in one of our asterisk boxes. Its a simple
 asterisk setup with one FXO/FXS card and basic static extensions
 file, etc. When we dial out over the pots line, 4 out of 5 times, it
 will work. However,every 4 or 5 times, we get an error back from the
 provider that says The number you have dialed. blah blah blah. 
 Common defect in the Zaptel driver.
 It does NOT listen for dial tone, so if you have not inserted a w or
 three into the dial string, it will dial before the Central Office is
 ready, and it may miss a digit, causing misdials.

 Curious that cheap modems years ago learned to listen for dial tone,
 but  the Zaptel driver doesn't, and of course this is considered a
 feature request rather than a bug, and no one seems to want to fix it.

 John Novack

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] no dtmf pcom 650 only outbound calls

2007-06-04 Thread A_ Navone

PROBLEM...NO DTMF ON OUTBOUND CALLS


1
ASTERISK FORWARDS THE DIGITS

Got rfc2833 RTP packet from 66.108.217.191:2256 (type 101, seq 279, ts 
-1975142833, len 4, mark 0, event 0009, end 1, duration 1600)


Sent RTP packet to 209.212.88.161:32872 (type 101, seq 63407, ts 60776, len 
4)


Sent RTP packet to 209.212.88.161:32872 (type 101, seq 63408, ts 60776, len 
4)


Sent RTP packet to 209.212.88.161:32872 (type 101, seq 63409, ts 60776, len 
4)


Sent RTP packet to 209.212.88.161:32872 (type 101, seq 63410, ts 60776, len 
4)


Sent RTP packet to 209.212.88.161:32872 (type 101, seq 63410, ts 60776, len 
4)


Sent RTP packet to 209.212.88.161:32872 (type 101, seq 63410, ts 60776, len 
4)


2
POLYCOM IS SET CORRECTLY

DTMF tone.dtmf.level=-15 tone.dtmf.onTime=50 tone.dtmf.offTime=50 
tone.dtmf.chassis.masking=0 tone.dtmf.stim.pac.offHookOnly=0 
tone.dtmf.viaRtp=1 tone.dtmf.rfc2833Control=1 
tone.dtmf.rfc2833Payload=101/

 chord_sets

3
DTMF WORKS FINE WHEN CHECKING VOICEMAIL

4
WHEN CHANGE CARRIERS NO CHANGE

5
CANNOT HEAR DTMF IN EAR WHEN CALL A PHONE

6
only with pcom650 never a problem with 601 and 501

7
when change to inband dtmf (in freepbx and in pcom config)
dtmf works but its spotty not acceptable

ASTERISK VER 1.12.13

thank you in advance

_
Get a preview of Live Earth, the hottest event this summer - only on MSN 
http://liveearth.msn.com?source=msntaglineliveearthhm


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] any codec passthru mode

2007-06-04 Thread Pavel Jezek

some work has been done here:
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4825
but seems to be quite death and probably not directly applicable to 
current asterisk src :'(



SIP wrote:

That just seems really, REALLY dumb for a program of this magnitude.

I know this has been patched here and there by one person or another, 
but does anyone know if any of these patches to make CODEC negotiation 
actually, you know, negotiate a CODEC will ever make it into the core 
src?



Jaswinder Singh wrote:

Asterisk by default uses the codec preferred by other device/client  .
Asterisk 1.2 ( dunno abt 1.4 specifically)  is not intelligent enough
to check if it can avoid transcoding by forcing same codec on other
side of conversation . If both sides prefer g729 then asterisk does
not do transcoding but if one side prefer gsm and other prefers g729
and the gsm side can also support g729 still asterisk will transcode .
Someone posted a patch to this in mantis bug tracking system at digium
for 1.2 .. google for it and maybe you can find  .

On 31/05/07, Rizwan Hisham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody has any documentation on codec negotiation within 
asterisk?


Well im using free g729 codec for testing purposes. i mentioned g729 
just as
an example. whatever codec is mentioned in user perefernce, asterisk 
uses

ulaw to throw out the call.


On 5/30/07, Marco Mouta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 so you r sure you have g729 licences installed and ur * is 
transcoding

your RTP streaming?

 Test the work flow with disallow=all and allow=g729, can be my 
mistake but
I remember to read somewhere on the net any issue about codec 
negotiating

precedence when you use allow=all.

 good luck



 On 5/30/07, Rizwan Hisham  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hi all,
  My configuration is:
  USER (connects to) ASTERISK---(connects to)---CARRIER-OUT
 
  i want the user preffered codec to pass thru asterisk to 
carrier-out.

what i mean is:
  USER (user uses g729) ASTERISK---(asterisk should use 
g729 for

dialing out)---CARRIER-OUT
 
  instead, this is what happens
  USER (user uses g729) ASTERISK---(asterisk uses
g711u)---CARRIER-OUT
 
  How can i force asterisk to use user preffered codec for dialing 
out so

that my asterisk machine saves time by no conversion
  USER PREFERENCE IS
  disallow=all
  allow=g729
 
  CARRIER PREFERENCE IS
  allow=all
 
  Anybody who can help?
 
  --
  Rizwan Hisham
  Software Engineer
  AXVOICE Inc.
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 



 --
 Esta mensagem (incluindo quaisquer anexos) pode conter informação
confidencial para uso exclusivo do destinatário. Se não for o 
destinatário
pretendido, não deverá usar, distribuir ou copiar este e-mail. Se 
recebeu

esta mensagem por engano, por favor informe o emissor e elimine-a
imediatamente. Obrigado.

 This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
proprietary, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If

you believe you have received this message in error, please advise the
sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you.
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





--
Rizwan Hisham
Software Engineer
AXVOICE Inc.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] FX Dialing Odd

2007-06-04 Thread John Novack

Don't overthink this
Error messages from providers are frequently misleading and inaccurate
Some only use one recording for anything they think they can't process.
Add at least one w to the dial string and see if all the misdials 
don't go away.

Also check the list archives for MANY such complaints

John Novack

Rob Schall wrote:

But if this was the case, then why would the message playback (from the
provider) read back the digits from the start. I mean, I dialed
630-XXX-XXX and it reads back 312 (my local area code)-630-XXX-X

I would think if it wasn't waiting, then it would do like a 312-30X-XX-XX

Rob


John Novack wrote:
  

Rob Schall wrote:


Here's a possible bug, or more likely, I'm just missing something.

We have a pots card in one of our asterisk boxes. Its a simple
asterisk setup with one FXO/FXS card and basic static extensions
file, etc. When we dial out over the pots line, 4 out of 5 times, it
will work. However,every 4 or 5 times, we get an error back from the
provider that says The number you have dialed. blah blah blah. 
  

Common defect in the Zaptel driver.
It does NOT listen for dial tone, so if you have not inserted a w or
three into the dial string, it will dial before the Central Office is
ready, and it may miss a digit, causing misdials.

Curious that cheap modems years ago learned to listen for dial tone,
but  the Zaptel driver doesn't, and of course this is considered a
feature request rather than a bug, and no one seems to want to fix it.

John Novack

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




  
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] any codec passthru mode

2007-06-04 Thread Rizwan Hisham

has anybody made a patch for asterisk 1.4*?

On 6/4/07, Jaswinder Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Asterisk by default uses the codec preferred by other device/client  .
Asterisk 1.2 ( dunno abt 1.4 specifically)  is not intelligent enough
to check if it can avoid transcoding by forcing same codec on other
side of conversation . If both sides prefer g729 then asterisk does
not do transcoding but if one side prefer gsm and other prefers g729
and the gsm side can also support g729 still asterisk will transcode .
Someone posted a patch to this in mantis bug tracking system at digium
for 1.2 .. google for it and maybe you can find  .

On 31/05/07, Rizwan Hisham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Does anybody has any documentation on codec negotiation within asterisk?

 Well im using free g729 codec for testing purposes. i mentioned g729
just as
 an example. whatever codec is mentioned in user perefernce, asterisk
uses
 ulaw to throw out the call.


 On 5/30/07, Marco Mouta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  so you r sure you have g729 licences installed and ur * is transcoding
 your RTP streaming?
 
  Test the work flow with disallow=all and allow=g729, can be my mistake
but
 I remember to read somewhere on the net any issue about codec
negotiating
 precedence when you use allow=all.
 
  good luck
 
 
 
  On 5/30/07, Rizwan Hisham  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Hi all,
   My configuration is:
   USER (connects to) ASTERISK---(connects to)---CARRIER-OUT
  
   i want the user preffered codec to pass thru asterisk to
carrier-out.
 what i mean is:
   USER (user uses g729) ASTERISK---(asterisk should use g729
for
 dialing out)---CARRIER-OUT
  
   instead, this is what happens
   USER (user uses g729) ASTERISK---(asterisk uses
 g711u)---CARRIER-OUT
  
   How can i force asterisk to use user preffered codec for dialing out
so
 that my asterisk machine saves time by no conversion
   USER PREFERENCE IS
   disallow=all
   allow=g729
  
   CARRIER PREFERENCE IS
   allow=all
  
   Anybody who can help?
  
   --
   Rizwan Hisham
   Software Engineer
   AXVOICE Inc.
   ___
   --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
  
   asterisk-users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  Esta mensagem (incluindo quaisquer anexos) pode conter informação
 confidencial para uso exclusivo do destinatário. Se não for o
destinatário
 pretendido, não deverá usar, distribuir ou copiar este e-mail. Se
recebeu
 esta mensagem por engano, por favor informe o emissor e elimine-a
 imediatamente. Obrigado.
 
  This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is
 addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
 proprietary, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
If
 you believe you have received this message in error, please advise the
 sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you.
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 



 --
 Rizwan Hisham
 Software Engineer
 AXVOICE Inc.
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





--
Rizwan Hisham
Software Engineer
AXVOICE Inc.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] FX Dialing Odd

2007-06-04 Thread Rob Schall
Also, in the dial command the w says its for the *1 recording. Not
waiting. Is the documentation wrong? What is the correct way to wait in
the dial command?

Rob


John Novack wrote:


 Rob Schall wrote:
 Here's a possible bug, or more likely, I'm just missing something.

 We have a pots card in one of our asterisk boxes. Its a simple
 asterisk setup with one FXO/FXS card and basic static extensions
 file, etc. When we dial out over the pots line, 4 out of 5 times, it
 will work. However,every 4 or 5 times, we get an error back from the
 provider that says The number you have dialed. blah blah blah. 
 Common defect in the Zaptel driver.
 It does NOT listen for dial tone, so if you have not inserted a w or
 three into the dial string, it will dial before the Central Office is
 ready, and it may miss a digit, causing misdials.

 Curious that cheap modems years ago learned to listen for dial tone,
 but  the Zaptel driver doesn't, and of course this is considered a
 feature request rather than a bug, and no one seems to want to fix it.

 John Novack

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] wifi sip phone real-world experiences?

2007-06-04 Thread Zoa

We have it (in belgium)
http://www.voipsolutions.be/phones/dect-sip-phones/siemens-gigaset-sl75-wlan-voip-phone.html

I still think DECT is better though :)

Zoa

Alex Crow wrote:

Alban,

Thanks! Where on earth did you source this? I can't seen to find hide
nor hair of it here in the UK :(

Alex

On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 16:01 +0200, Alban wrote:
  

Hi,
I've tested several wifi phone (UtStarcom, Hitachi 3000 and 5000, and one 
Siemens). The Siemens is the best one, for a really cheaper price than 
hitachi. And was the only one which roams well between AP (same SSID, same 
channel) with WPA. Battery is still a problem, especially if the coverture is 
not very good everywhere. But that was the best one I could test... The 
reference is : Gigaset SL75 WLAN.

Hope it helps
Alban


Le Lundi 4 Juin 2007 14:53, Bryan Laird a écrit :


On Jun 4, 2007, at 8:31 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
  

On Monday 04 June 2007 8:24 am, Bryan Laird wrote:


  - Physically the phone feels very light and cheap, that if you were
to drop it that it might not survive very many of them.  The buttons
feel more
like a toy than anything else but once you get beyond that it works.
  

How are they for big hands?  I'll have to do some checking around
to see if I
can find a rubber case for it or something, it's all concrete
floors here.


Considering I too have the sausage finger problem... the buttons are
incredibly similar
to what you find on the Nokia candy bar style phones.

  

- Address book storage is ok the interface from the phone is fairly
standard for what you would see in a cell phone and adding entries
isn't really
all that horrid of a task.  You can also add entries via the web
interface which does make for an easier way to add several entries
but the lack of
anything resembling a 'sync' function could be considered bothersome.
  

Bugger.



Last thing, one neat thing about the wip300 if you are adventurous is
the fact that the firmware is under GPL... so if you really felt like
it you could probably change the behavior of
the phone.
  

This I was not aware of.  I will certainly evaluate this phone and
it's bigger
brother.



Anyway sorry for the long message but I felt like chiming in on
this.  All in all I don't think it's a horrible phone I do however
think it's over priced for what it is but not enough demand on
this type of device is always going to keep the price up in the air.
  

Your message is *exactly* the kind of reply I was hoping to get.
Thank you so
much for taking the time to write such a long response.  I truly
appreciate
it.

-A.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bryan Laird, Sr. Manager CM Operations

-+-
Cablemodems are the gateway to the Internet.
The Internet is a gateway to some things that are  better left un-seen.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] wifi sip phone real-world experiences?

2007-06-04 Thread Alban
Alex,
I bought them at Beronet (shop.beronet.com), a german company.
I'm located in France, no problem for them to send them here...
Alban

Le Lundi 4 Juin 2007 17:29, Alex Crow a écrit :
 Alban,

 Thanks! Where on earth did you source this? I can't seen to find hide
 nor hair of it here in the UK :(

 Alex

 On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 16:01 +0200, Alban wrote:
  Hi,
  I've tested several wifi phone (UtStarcom, Hitachi 3000 and 5000, and one
  Siemens). The Siemens is the best one, for a really cheaper price than
  hitachi. And was the only one which roams well between AP (same SSID,
  same channel) with WPA. Battery is still a problem, especially if the
  coverture is not very good everywhere. But that was the best one I could
  test... The reference is : Gigaset SL75 WLAN.
  Hope it helps
  Alban
 
  Le Lundi 4 Juin 2007 14:53, Bryan Laird a écrit :
   On Jun 4, 2007, at 8:31 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Monday 04 June 2007 8:24 am, Bryan Laird wrote:
  - Physically the phone feels very light and cheap, that if you
were to drop it that it might not survive very many of them.  The
buttons feel more
like a toy than anything else but once you get beyond that it works.
   
How are they for big hands?  I'll have to do some checking around
to see if I
can find a rubber case for it or something, it's all concrete
floors here.
  
   Considering I too have the sausage finger problem... the buttons are
   incredibly similar
   to what you find on the Nokia candy bar style phones.
  
- Address book storage is ok the interface from the phone is fairly
standard for what you would see in a cell phone and adding entries
isn't really
all that horrid of a task.  You can also add entries via the web
interface which does make for an easier way to add several entries
but the lack of
anything resembling a 'sync' function could be considered
bothersome.
   
Bugger.
   
Last thing, one neat thing about the wip300 if you are adventurous
is the fact that the firmware is under GPL... so if you really felt
like it you could probably change the behavior of
the phone.
   
This I was not aware of.  I will certainly evaluate this phone and
it's bigger
brother.
   
Anyway sorry for the long message but I felt like chiming in on
this.  All in all I don't think it's a horrible phone I do however
think it's over priced for what it is but not enough demand on
this type of device is always going to keep the price up in the air.
   
Your message is *exactly* the kind of reply I was hoping to get.
Thank you so
much for taking the time to write such a long response.  I truly
appreciate
it.
   
-A.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
   
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
   -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
   Bryan Laird, Sr. Manager CM Operations
  
   -+-
   Cablemodems are the gateway to the Internet.
   The Internet is a gateway to some things that are  better left un-seen.
  
  
   ___
   --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
  
   asterisk-users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] FX Dialing Odd

2007-06-04 Thread John Novack

Not option w
add a w in the DIAL STRING
Guess you didn't search the archives?
Sometime in 1.2 this feature was fixed to  work with pulse dial as well.

example:

exten = s,1,Dial(ZAP/g4/w(${ARG1:3:4}),360,Tt)  



John Novack

Rob Schall wrote:

Also, in the dial command the w says its for the *1 recording. Not
waiting. Is the documentation wrong? What is the correct way to wait in
the dial command?

Rob


John Novack wrote:
  

Rob Schall wrote:


Here's a possible bug, or more likely, I'm just missing something.

We have a pots card in one of our asterisk boxes. Its a simple
asterisk setup with one FXO/FXS card and basic static extensions
file, etc. When we dial out over the pots line, 4 out of 5 times, it
will work. However,every 4 or 5 times, we get an error back from the
provider that says The number you have dialed. blah blah blah. 
  

Common defect in the Zaptel driver.
It does NOT listen for dial tone, so if you have not inserted a w or
three into the dial string, it will dial before the Central Office is
ready, and it may miss a digit, causing misdials.

Curious that cheap modems years ago learned to listen for dial tone,
but  the Zaptel driver doesn't, and of course this is considered a
feature request rather than a bug, and no one seems to want to fix it.

John Novack

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




  
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] FX Dialing Odd

2007-06-04 Thread Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling
Asterisk does NOT wait for dialtone when going offhook on an FXO port. 
Asterisk is sending digits to the telco too quickly.


Add a w (.5 second wait) before the extension to be dialed.  Example:

exten = _91NXXNXX,n,Dial(${TRUNK}/w${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}},,wW)

Rob Schall wrote:

Here's a possible bug, or more likely, I'm just missing something.

We have a pots card in one of our asterisk boxes. Its a simple asterisk
setup with one FXO/FXS card and basic static extensions file, etc. When
we dial out over the pots line, 4 out of 5 times, it will work. However,
every 4 or 5 times, we get an error back from the provider that says
The number you have dialed. blah blah blah. The interesting there
there, is that the number it quotes us, adds our local area code in
front of it. And this only seems to happen on long distance context
numbers. So when we dial 630-XXX-, sometimes we are sent to
312-681-XXX-.

Here's our configs:
zaptel.conf
loadzone=us
defaultzone=us
fxoks=1-2
fxsks=3

zapata.conf
[trunkgroups]

[channels]

language=en
context=internal

usecallerid=yes
hidecallerid=no
callwaiting=yes
usecallingpres=yes
callwaitingcallerid=yes
threewaycalling=yes
transfer=yes
cancallforward=yes
callreturn=yes
echocancel=yes
callgroup=1
pickupgroup=1
immediate=no

;define channels
context=internal
signalling=fxo_ks
channel = 1-2

context=zapchans
signalling=fxs_ks
group=1
channel = 3

extensions.conf
[general]
static=yes
writeprotect=no
clearglobalvars=no priorityjumping=no

[globals]
CONSOLE=Console/dsp ; Console interface for demo
;TRUNK=Zap/g1   ; Trunk interface
TRUNK=Zap/3 ; Trunk interface
TRUNKMSD=1  ; MSD digits to strip
(usually 1 or 0)

[trunkint]
exten = _9011.,1,Macro(dundi-e164,${EXTEN:4})
exten = _9011.,n,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}})

[trunkld]
exten = _91NXXNXX,1,Verbose(LD)
exten = _91NXXNXX,n,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}},,wW)
exten = _91NXXNXX,n,Hangup()

[trunklocal]
exten = _9NXX,1,Verbose(LOCAL)
exten = _9NXX,n,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}},,wW)
exten = _9NXX,n,Hangup()

[trunktollfree]
exten = _91800NXX,1,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}})
exten = _91888NXX,1,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}})
exten = _91877NXX,1,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}})
exten = _91866NXX,1,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}})

[outgoing]
include = trunklocal
include = trunktollfree
include = trunkld

;ZAP Channels
[zapchans]
exten = 3,1,Dial(ZAP/1-1)
exten = 3,2,Hangup()
exten = 4,1,Dial(ZAP/2-1)
exten = 4,2,Hangup()

exten = s,1,Answer()
exten = s,2,NoOp(${CHANNEL:4:1})
exten = s,3,Goto(${CHANNEL:4:1},1)
exten = s,4,Hangup()

[incoming]
include =internal

[internal]
include = outgoing

exten = ,1,Dial(Zap/3/1630XXX,,wW)
exten = ,2,Hangup()



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] wifi sip phone real-world experiences?

2007-06-04 Thread olivier.taylor




well,

the best I got is the tc300/arcor/twintel a gsm/wifi from pirelli -
http://www.pirellibroadband.com/en_IT/browser/attachments/pdf/DPL10.pdf
tried many wifi phones, that's the best we got.

Long lifetime for the battery, good reception, roaming between Access
points with the same network...

good enough for us and cheap.

livier

Andrew Kohlsmith a crit:

  On Monday 04 June 2007 10:28 am, Paul Hayes wrote:
  
  
Looking at the OP's requirements list in the first post, there is
nothing currently on the market which will cover anything like all those
features (and do it well!).

  
  
I've got the WIP300 and 330 on my list, with the latter being the more likely 
candidate, as I can throw up custom apps once I figure out how it's 
done.  :-)  I like the idea of a wifi phone running Linux though, so both of 
these options will have to be investigated.

  
  
but I'm yet to test any of these.  The main problem is they have a habit
of constantly losing connection with my access points.  Even the F1000G
and F3000 phones I have here don't do that.

  
  
My F1000G phones *CONSTANTLY* lost connection with my WRT54, and it had 
nothing to do with signal strength, as the access point was less than 10 feet 
away from my desk, with nothing between to interfere.  :-(

  
  
I'm yet to be convinced that wifi in it's current state is any use for
telephony at all.  DECT works so much better, it just needs someone to
make a fully functioning SIP DECT phone.  The Siemens is good but they
need to work on more SIP functions, although proper transfers should be
possible soon.

  
  
I am also slowly coming to this conclusion.  Polycom recently acquired 
SpectraLink, who've got many years in the wireless phone business.  They've 
got both Wifi and DECT offerings, but nothing with bluetooth, so the search 
continues.  :-)

-A.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

  



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] AEL2 Includes in Macro...

2007-06-04 Thread Douglas Garstang
Where's Steve Murphy when you need him? :-)

 

This doesn't seem to work in AEL2...

 

Macro foo(arg1) {

 

.

Includes {

 Hangup;

}

 

}

 

The error is: File: /etc/asterisk/extensions.ael, Line 59, Cols: 5-12:
Error: syntax error, unexpected KW_INCLUDES, expecting '}'

 

The same error does not occur when the includes is in a context.

 

I need to have the ability to include my hangup routine in macros, as
theoretically, a hang up could occur while asterisk is processing code
from the macro.

 

This is Asterisk 1.4.4

 

Doug.

 

 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] FX Dialing Odd

2007-06-04 Thread David Boyd
What happens if you connect  the fxo to the fxs and try several attempts
at completing a call? This should at least tell you if the issue is
outdialed digit issues or telco receipt issues.
Dave

On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 10:30 -0500, Rob Schall wrote:
 But if this was the case, then why would the message playback (from the
 provider) read back the digits from the start. I mean, I dialed
 630-XXX-XXX and it reads back 312 (my local area code)-630-XXX-X
 
 I would think if it wasn't waiting, then it would do like a 312-30X-XX-XX
 
 Rob
 
 
 John Novack wrote:
 
 
  Rob Schall wrote:
  Here's a possible bug, or more likely, I'm just missing something.
 
  We have a pots card in one of our asterisk boxes. Its a simple
  asterisk setup with one FXO/FXS card and basic static extensions
  file, etc. When we dial out over the pots line, 4 out of 5 times, it
  will work. However,every 4 or 5 times, we get an error back from the
  provider that says The number you have dialed. blah blah blah. 
  Common defect in the Zaptel driver.
  It does NOT listen for dial tone, so if you have not inserted a w or
  three into the dial string, it will dial before the Central Office is
  ready, and it may miss a digit, causing misdials.
 
  Curious that cheap modems years ago learned to listen for dial tone,
  but  the Zaptel driver doesn't, and of course this is considered a
  feature request rather than a bug, and no one seems to want to fix it.
 
  John Novack
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Compilation after Source code changes in Asterisk

2007-06-04 Thread Mojo with Horan Company, LLC
the 'make' command would typically recompile and re-link only the files 
that have changed.  Not sure how well this works with asterisk, but I 
think that's the idea.


Mojo

Arpit Mehta wrote:

hi,

This might be the most obvious thing to you. I need to change some parts 
of the source code of Asterisk. I was wondering if we have to compile 
the whole source code again everytime using the commands (which i think 
might take some time to compile again)


cd /usr/src/asterisk-version
make
make install


or is there a faster and better way to do things

Thanks a lot for all the help i have recievied from this mailing list.

-- AM




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] FX Dialing Odd

2007-06-04 Thread Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling
You want Asterisk to dial 1-630-XXX-XXX, but the telco only got 
630-XXX-, which the provider will see 630- and assume your 
current area code of 312.




Rob Schall wrote:

But if this was the case, then why would the message playback (from the
provider) read back the digits from the start. I mean, I dialed
630-XXX-XXX and it reads back 312 (my local area code)-630-XXX-X

I would think if it wasn't waiting, then it would do like a 312-30X-XX-XX

Rob


John Novack wrote:


Rob Schall wrote:

Here's a possible bug, or more likely, I'm just missing something.

We have a pots card in one of our asterisk boxes. Its a simple
asterisk setup with one FXO/FXS card and basic static extensions
file, etc. When we dial out over the pots line, 4 out of 5 times, it
will work. However,every 4 or 5 times, we get an error back from the
provider that says The number you have dialed. blah blah blah. 

Common defect in the Zaptel driver.
It does NOT listen for dial tone, so if you have not inserted a w or
three into the dial string, it will dial before the Central Office is
ready, and it may miss a digit, causing misdials.

Curious that cheap modems years ago learned to listen for dial tone,
but  the Zaptel driver doesn't, and of course this is considered a
feature request rather than a bug, and no one seems to want to fix it.

John Novack

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Unicall/R2 for Asterisk 1.4 Available for TESTING

2007-06-04 Thread Tobias Wolf
Humberto Figuera schrieb:
 HI Tobias,
 
 look in www.soft-switch.org/unicall/unicall/index.html ;p
 
Thank you. Not very complete but it has given me an idea what to think
of unicall.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Debug meetme

2007-06-04 Thread Adrian Marsh
Hi,

I'm having complaints from some users about calls into dynamic meetme
sessions failing.  I'm guessing that they are dialling the wrong DTMF
keys, OR that DTMF is hearing the digits entered wrong (or not hearing
some).

I've put debug = debug into logging.conf, and searched through the
file,  but I'm not sure how to debug.

EG, 

Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is 'USER ABC
2060'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is '2060'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is '2098'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is 'from-sip'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is
'SIP/460-b7310bf0'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is '(null)'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is 'MeetMe'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is '|DsM'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is '2007-06-01
14:31:51'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is '2007-06-01
14:31:51'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is '2007-06-01
14:32:33'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is '42'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is '42'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is 'ANSWERED'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is 'DOCUMENTATION'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is '(null)'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is '1180704711.1969'
Jun  1 14:32:33 DEBUG[14820] pbx.c: Function result is '(null)'

Where would it show what DTMF they entered?

Cheers,

Adrian
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] no ringing tone making attended transfer whith an IAX client

2007-06-04 Thread Antonio Almodóvar

Hi

I have configured attended transfer in features.conf like this

[general]
parkext = 70   ; What ext. to dial to park
parkpos = 00-99; What extensions to park calls on
context = parkedcalls  ; Which context parked calls are in
parkingtime = 300  ; Number of seconds a call can
be parked for (default is 45 seconds)
featuredigittimeout = 1000
courtesytone = beep
xfersound = beep   ; to indicate an attended transfer is complete
xferfailsound = beeperr

[featuremap]
blindxfer = #9
automon = *1  ; One Touch Record
atxfer = #

When I'm making a transfer, just after dialing the transfering number,
I don't listen any ringing tone, but the transfer is made correctly.

In detail, when I press # I hear Transfer and the dial tone is
played. I dial the extension I want to transfer and I don't hear any
ringing tone but the transfer is beeing made.

Is this OK?

Thank you very much.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Delay in posting of messages to list

2007-06-04 Thread David Boyd
Can anyone enlighten me as to why it takes 40 minutes or more for a
posting to the list to appear.  This seems excessive, as other forums do
not take this long.  


Dave

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] FX Dialing Odd

2007-06-04 Thread Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling
OPTIONS to the Dial line (at the end) are different the special digits 
in the number string.



Rob Schall wrote:

Also, in the dial command the w says its for the *1 recording. Not
waiting. Is the documentation wrong? What is the correct way to wait in
the dial command?

Rob


John Novack wrote:


Rob Schall wrote:

Here's a possible bug, or more likely, I'm just missing something.

We have a pots card in one of our asterisk boxes. Its a simple
asterisk setup with one FXO/FXS card and basic static extensions
file, etc. When we dial out over the pots line, 4 out of 5 times, it
will work. However,every 4 or 5 times, we get an error back from the
provider that says The number you have dialed. blah blah blah. 

Common defect in the Zaptel driver.
It does NOT listen for dial tone, so if you have not inserted a w or
three into the dial string, it will dial before the Central Office is
ready, and it may miss a digit, causing misdials.

Curious that cheap modems years ago learned to listen for dial tone,
but  the Zaptel driver doesn't, and of course this is considered a
feature request rather than a bug, and no one seems to want to fix it.

John Novack

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] FX Dialing Odd

2007-06-04 Thread Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling

John Novack wrote:

Not option w
add a w in the DIAL STRING
Guess you didn't search the archives?
Sometime in 1.2 this feature was fixed to  work with pulse dial as well.


If he had searched the archives, he never would have posted the message 
in the first place.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Centos kernel source

2007-06-04 Thread Khaled Chehab
I am using centos 4.4 server cd ,when I am trying to compile zaptel 1.4.2
... error appears 

From where I can get the missing rpms .or kernel source 



From where I can get the centos 4.4 server kernel source.

 

 

Regards

 




*
No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf 
of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation 
by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual in this 
electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or its 
subsidiaries and associates.

This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed to the 
addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from disclosure 
belonging to Xplorium.

If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message and its 
attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and notify the 
sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or attachment or 
disclose its content to any other person.

Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic message and any of 
its attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses or other defects.
*
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Calls being dropped

2007-06-04 Thread Compnet Bobby
 

We have the latest version of asterisk, on a xeon dell server (2gb ram),
with 6 snom320's(latest firmware) and 3 grandstream gxp 2000's (latest
stable firmware) and are having a few problems. We have a basic menu that
transfers calls to different extensions. The problems can be found on all
extensions. We have 2 different incoming providers and the problem happens
on both providers. 

 

I want your input on 2 problems, they are the following:

 

1.

 

60% of the time everything works fine and there are no problems, 40% of
times when the calls are transferred to an extension, after a few seconds  ,
the call drops. The log from the server is below(this is from pickup to
hangup, the main area of concern is where it says warning). 

 

 

-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Answer(SIP/9097406868-09e110f8,
) in new stack

-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2]
BackGround(SIP/9097406868-09e110f8, menus/welcome-to-exec) in new stack

-- SIP/9097406868-09e110f8 Playing 'menus/welcome-to-exec' (language
'en')

  == CDR updated on SIP/9097406868-09e110f8

-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Dial(SIP/9097406868-09e110f8,
SIP/103|50|m) in new stack

-- Called 103

-- Started music on hold, class 'default', on SIP/9097406868-09e110f8

-- SIP/103-09dedd68 is ringing

[May 29 09:05:22] WARNING[2678]: chan_sip.c:1899 retrans_pkt: Maximum
retries exceeded on transmission [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for seqno 1 (Critical Response)

[May 29 09:05:22] WARNING[2678]: chan_sip.c:1916 retrans_pkt: Hanging up
call [EMAIL PROTECTED] - no reply to our critical
packet.

-- Stopped music on hold on SIP/9097406868-09e110f8

  == Spawn extension (from-sip, 103, 1) exited non-zero on
'SIP/9097406868-09e110f8'

 

 

2. When a call comes in or is transferred(not on outgoing), there is a delay
until the person on the incoming line can hear you. We can hear them, but
they can't hear us. Sometimes there is no delay, sometimes for person
calling in cant hear you for 6 seconds. 

 

 

Thanks for the help in advance!!!

 

 

 

 

 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] cisco 7940 and auto-answer (aastra 480i vs 7940)

2007-06-04 Thread Julian Lyndon-Smith

Having scoured the web, I still am no better off ..

I have 2 Aastra480i's , and 120+ cisco 7940's :) . I am trying to decide 
which model to use going forward when we purchase more kit. They both 
seem much on a par regarding features.


Q1: Is there anyway of making the cisco auto-answer _without_ having to 
manually edit the configuration on each phone ? I've been able to get 
the 480i to auto-answer by putting


SIPAddHeader(Alert-Info: \;info=alert-autoanswer)

into the dialplan. But it doesn't work with the cisco phones.

Q2: Is there any real difference between the 480i and 9112 / 9113 phones 
apart from number of lines and display size ?


Julian.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] realtime ldap peer matching

2007-06-04 Thread Caio Zanolla

Hi everyone,

in ldap realtime sip peers i need fullcontact set to 
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] for asterisk to correctly match the peers (at least 
for the natted peers to reach them)...


anyway, how do I populate fullcontact on the fly with information from 
exten and userip?
of course, i could just do it staticaly on ldap but since the info is 
already there why not make use of it?


on res_ldap.conf i have attribute = fullcontact = AstAccountFullContact
it would be nice to have something like:
attribute = fullcontact = sip:.$AstExten.@.$AstIPaddress
or some kind of dialplan scripting to archieve this...


cheers,
Caio.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4.4 Segfaults with asterisk-ooh323 from addons-1.4.1

2007-06-04 Thread Bruce Ferrell

the config file is basically the sample file

gdb of the core files show the below.

Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_ooh323.so
#0  0xb7d203e7 in strcasecmp () from /lib/libc.so.6


Any suggestions?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Delay in posting of messages to list

2007-06-04 Thread John Novack

Well, the claim of 1 members MIGHT have something to do with it!

E-mail delivery is notoriously erratic as well.

If you think this is slow, try some on Yahoogroups!

John Novack


David Boyd wrote:

Can anyone enlighten me as to why it takes 40 minutes or more for a
posting to the list to appear.  This seems excessive, as other forums do
not take this long.  



Dave

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

  
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Delay in posting of messages to list

2007-06-04 Thread Erik Anderson

On 6/4/07, David Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Can anyone enlighten me as to why it takes 40 minutes or more for a
posting to the list to appear.  This seems excessive, as other forums do
not take this long.


Dave - my postings consistently show up nearly immediately. Perhaps
your SMTP server(s) is causing some delay.

-erik
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] answer a voip call, play info.

2007-06-04 Thread Matthew Pease

Hi all -

Not really sure where to post this question as I am just starting to
research this issue.

We want to allow users to dial into our did voip number.   Our service will:

1.  get their phone number via caller ID.  look up data with the caller id.

2.  generate a wave file based on the data returned  play it to the
user over the established voip link.


How might this be done using DID origination and a VOIP stack?  Or is
this even what I want?

Any ideas?


Thank you--
Matt Pease
ParkingHero, Inc.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] cisco 7940 and auto-answer (aastra 480i vs 7940)

2007-06-04 Thread Justin Moore

On 6/4/07, Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Q2: Is there any real difference between the 480i and 9112 / 9113 phones
apart from number of lines and display size ?


I have no experience with the Cisco's, so I can't answer those
questions. However, I have deployed quite a few Aastras...

I have a 480i CT on my desk which I love. Specifically, I prefer the
angle that it sits up at on my desk when compared with the 9133i. I
went with 9133i's throughout the rest of the office, mostly due to
cost. The 480i an the 9133i both have native Power over Ethernet - no
external dongles and such are needed - just patch the phone into your
PoE switch and you're ready to go. The 9112i is a much more basic
phone - no built-in PoE, less line appearances, and the screen doesn't
have a tilt adjustment like the 9133i does. All these Aastra phones do
share a common config file format though, which makes provisioning
over TFTP... pretty trivial (pardon the pun).

--
Justin Moore
aka wantmoore
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Detecting card on the PCI Slot

2007-06-04 Thread Sanjay Rajdev
I have some Analog card on a PCI slot of a remote computer, Is their a way I 
can figure out remotely the name of the card.
I have FC6 installed on the machine.

Regards,
Sanjay Rajdev

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Help with IAX

2007-06-04 Thread Malcom Kemp
I finally got a chance to investigate this further.  The fundamental
problem seemed to be that I was using a context name of iax-trunk.
When I changed this to intrunk, it worked.  What are the rules for
context names? Was it the length or the special character that caused me
problems?

 
Thanks for your help.

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Ruggles
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 3:10 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Help with IAX

 
Well this may not feel like progress, but it is. You no longer have an
authentication issue, you now have a routing issue. Could you attach a
copy of the extension.conf file on 192.168.253.21?

 
 
Thanks,

 
David Ruggles

CCNA MCSE (NT) CNA A+

Network Engineer  Safe Data, Inc.

(910) 285-7200[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Malcom
Kemp
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 3:42 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Help with IAX

From 192.168.253.20:

*CLI [May 30 14:39:03] NOTICE[6051]: chan_iax2.c:7146
socket_process: Rejected connect attempt from 192.168.253.21, request
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' does not exist

 
From 192.168.253.21:

[May 30 14:39:03] WARNING[28640]: chan_iax2.c:6959
socket_process: Call rejected by 192.168.253.20: No such
context/extension

 
I even changed the extension to take the pattern off:

exten = 205,1,Macro(voicemail,${E205})

 


+
This e-mail was checked by the TecInfo Content Scanning Service for potentially 
harmful content, such as viruses or Spam For more information, call 
800.863.5415 or visit www.tecinfo.net
+___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Get calling channel before pickup

2007-06-04 Thread Marcus Carlson

Hi,

Is it possible to get the remote channelname that will be bridged when 
the call is answered, only having the channel that is in the Ring(ing) 
state? As far as I can see no variable seems to fit when doing the show 
channel command.


I want to be able to redirect/manipulate an incoming call before it gets 
answered/bridged, but to do that I have to now which channel to use.


Is there a way? Prefarably using manager API.

Thanks,
Marcus

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Detecting card on the PCI Slot

2007-06-04 Thread Brandon Kruse
modprobe the default analog drivers. then dmesg.

-bk
- Original Message -
From: Sanjay Rajdev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, June 4, 2007 12:29:37 PM (GMT-0800) America/Tijuana
Subject: [asterisk-users] Detecting card on the PCI Slot

I have some Analog card on a PCI slot of a remote computer, Is their a way I 
can figure out remotely the name of the card.
I have FC6 installed on the machine.

Regards,
Sanjay Rajdev

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Detecting card on the PCI Slot

2007-06-04 Thread Gordon Henderson

On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Sanjay Rajdev wrote:


I have some Analog card on a PCI slot of a remote computer, Is their a way I 
can figure out remotely the name of the card.
I have FC6 installed on the machine.


Try the 'lspci' command.

Eg:

:00:14.0 Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX 
Modem/ISDN interface

is what a Digium TDM400P card looks like.

Gordon
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Detecting card on the PCI Slot

2007-06-04 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:59:37AM +0530, Sanjay Rajdev wrote:
 I have some Analog card on a PCI slot of a remote computer, Is their a way I 
 can figure out remotely the name of the card.
 I have FC6 installed on the machine.

lspci 

What driver handles it?

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen   
icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Get calling channel before pickup

2007-06-04 Thread Eric \ManxPower\ Wieling

Marcus Carlson wrote:

Is it possible to get the remote channelname that will be bridged when 
the call is answered, only having the channel that is in the Ring(ing) 
state? As far as I can see no variable seems to fit when doing the show 
channel command.


I want to be able to redirect/manipulate an incoming call before it gets 
answered/bridged, but to do that I have to now which channel to use.


Is there a way? Prefarably using manager API.


Asterisk does not know which of the several devices you are calling will 
pick up.


Dial(SIP/1234Zap/7IAX2/fred/555)


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] cisco 7940 and auto-answer (aastra 480i vs 7940)

2007-06-04 Thread Dave Bour
The 9112 also doesn't have a ethernet bridge in it.  The cost of adding
a switch to a local office puts this unit nearly priced as a 9133 which
I deploy mostly.
As for the 480...I had that..upgraded to the 57i (CT now - the wireless
handset supporting one).  Love it.  Button feel a little different but
the big screen and programmable toys make it worth the
differencenot an average user set though. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Moore
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 3:31 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] cisco 7940 and auto-answer (aastra 480i vs
7940)

On 6/4/07, Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Q2: Is there any real difference between the 480i and 9112 / 9113 
 phones apart from number of lines and display size ?

I have no experience with the Cisco's, so I can't answer those
questions. However, I have deployed quite a few Aastras...

I have a 480i CT on my desk which I love. Specifically, I prefer the
angle that it sits up at on my desk when compared with the 9133i. I went
with 9133i's throughout the rest of the office, mostly due to cost. The
480i an the 9133i both have native Power over Ethernet - no external
dongles and such are needed - just patch the phone into your PoE switch
and you're ready to go. The 9112i is a much more basic phone - no
built-in PoE, less line appearances, and the screen doesn't have a tilt
adjustment like the 9133i does. All these Aastra phones do share a
common config file format though, which makes provisioning over TFTP...
pretty trivial (pardon the pun).

--
Justin Moore
aka wantmoore
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] yum om centos

2007-06-04 Thread Rob Townley

There is a yum command to install from cache and not look online.  Details
are in man yum.Never tried what you are doing, so i can't say for sure
it would work.  But you probably have to pass yum the makecache command on
the first machine and install from cache on the second.   But this is just a
guess.  yum localinstall may help as well.

Hope this helps.

On 6/4/07, Khaled Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


A lot of dependencies required for each module, I don't know the sequence
of
the rpms.Any way to know that.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jaswinder
Singh
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 4:51 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] yum om centos

independently install each rpm via rpm command :-/

On 04/06/07, Khaled Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




 I have 2 servers, one connected to internet and the other is on a
private
 lan have no access to internet.

 On the first server I update the kernel by yum update

 And installed asterisk prerequisite module

 yum install gcc gcc-c++ compat-gcc-32 compat-gcc-32-c++ autoconf \
libtool
 make automake automake14 automake15 automake16 automake17 \ bison byacc
flex
 libtermcap libtermcap-devel newt newt-devel \ ncurses ncurses-devel
 openssl-devel zlib zlib-devel krb5-devel





 I zipped /var/cache/yum from the first server and extract it on the
second
 server at the same directory.



 On the second server I tried to update using

 yum update

  but the yum update failed.





 How can I do that with out connecting the second server to internet .







 Khaled

 Regards





  
  *
  No employee or agent is authorized to conclude
 any binding agreement on behalf of
 Xplorium with another party by e-mail
 without express written confirmation by an
 officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by
 an individual in this electronic message
 do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium
 or its subsidiaries and associates.

  This electronic message and its attachments are
 solely addressed to the addressee(s), and
 contain confidential information protected
 from disclosure belonging to Xplorium.

  If you are not the intended addressee of this
 electronic message and its attachments,
 kindly delete it immediately from your system and
 notify the sender by electronic mail. You
 must not copy this message or attachment
 or disclose its content to any other
 person.

  Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this
 electronic message and any of its
 attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses
 or other defects.
  *


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



*
No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on
behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written
confirmation by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual
in this electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or
its subsidiaries and associates.

This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed to the
addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from disclosure
belonging to Xplorium.

If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message and its
attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and notify the
sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or attachment or
disclose its content to any other person.

Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic message and
any of its attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses or other
defects.
*


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] FX Dialing Odd

2007-06-04 Thread Rob Schall
Thanks Eric.

That is exactly what the problem was. I actually added a D(1) instead of
the w, but either would work I'm sure. Its odd that you couldn't get a
better error than that. I mean, asterisk should be able to tell what was
actually sent and received by the other end. I shouldn't say it
should, but it would be nice if it could tell. :)

Rob


Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
 Asterisk does NOT wait for dialtone when going offhook on an FXO port.
 Asterisk is sending digits to the telco too quickly.

 Add a w (.5 second wait) before the extension to be dialed.  Example:

 exten = _91NXXNXX,n,Dial(${TRUNK}/w${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}},,wW)

 Rob Schall wrote:
 Here's a possible bug, or more likely, I'm just missing something.

 We have a pots card in one of our asterisk boxes. Its a simple asterisk
 setup with one FXO/FXS card and basic static extensions file, etc. When
 we dial out over the pots line, 4 out of 5 times, it will work. However,
 every 4 or 5 times, we get an error back from the provider that says
 The number you have dialed. blah blah blah. The interesting there
 there, is that the number it quotes us, adds our local area code in
 front of it. And this only seems to happen on long distance context
 numbers. So when we dial 630-XXX-, sometimes we are sent to
 312-681-XXX-.

 Here's our configs:
 zaptel.conf
 loadzone=us
 defaultzone=us
 fxoks=1-2
 fxsks=3

 zapata.conf
 [trunkgroups]

 [channels]

 language=en
 context=internal

 usecallerid=yes
 hidecallerid=no
 callwaiting=yes
 usecallingpres=yes
 callwaitingcallerid=yes
 threewaycalling=yes
 transfer=yes
 cancallforward=yes
 callreturn=yes
 echocancel=yes
 callgroup=1
 pickupgroup=1
 immediate=no

 ;define channels
 context=internal
 signalling=fxo_ks
 channel = 1-2

 context=zapchans
 signalling=fxs_ks
 group=1
 channel = 3

 extensions.conf
 [general]
 static=yes
 writeprotect=no
 clearglobalvars=no priorityjumping=no

 [globals]
 CONSOLE=Console/dsp ; Console interface
 for demo
 ;TRUNK=Zap/g1   ; Trunk interface
 TRUNK=Zap/3 ; Trunk interface
 TRUNKMSD=1  ; MSD digits to strip
 (usually 1 or 0)

 [trunkint]
 exten = _9011.,1,Macro(dundi-e164,${EXTEN:4})
 exten = _9011.,n,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}})

 [trunkld]
 exten = _91NXXNXX,1,Verbose(LD)
 exten = _91NXXNXX,n,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}},,wW)
 exten = _91NXXNXX,n,Hangup()

 [trunklocal]
 exten = _9NXX,1,Verbose(LOCAL)
 exten = _9NXX,n,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}},,wW)
 exten = _9NXX,n,Hangup()

 [trunktollfree]
 exten = _91800NXX,1,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}})
 exten = _91888NXX,1,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}})
 exten = _91877NXX,1,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}})
 exten = _91866NXX,1,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}})

 [outgoing]
 include = trunklocal
 include = trunktollfree
 include = trunkld

 ;ZAP Channels
 [zapchans]
 exten = 3,1,Dial(ZAP/1-1)
 exten = 3,2,Hangup()
 exten = 4,1,Dial(ZAP/2-1)
 exten = 4,2,Hangup()

 exten = s,1,Answer()
 exten = s,2,NoOp(${CHANNEL:4:1})
 exten = s,3,Goto(${CHANNEL:4:1},1)
 exten = s,4,Hangup()

 [incoming]
 include =internal

 [internal]
 include = outgoing

 exten = ,1,Dial(Zap/3/1630XXX,,wW)
 exten = ,2,Hangup()



 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Detecting card on the PCI Slot

2007-06-04 Thread Sanjay Rajdev
I have installed FC6 on it, want to configure it with Asterisk. It had some 
driver earlier but the machine has been formatted yesterday, so no idea.

Also I am new to Linux.

Regards,
Sanjay Rajdev

Phone : +1 (877) 342 2329 x 1702
Fax : +1 (815) 261 5907
http://www.featherstoneinformatics.com

Communications from Featherstone Informatics Group (FIG) may 
transmit information that is confidential and privileged information of 
Featherstone Informatics Group (FIG). Unless you are the intended 
addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone this communication 
or any information transmitted by this communication. If you have received 
such communication in error, please advise the sender by e-mail and/or 
telephone and destroy this communication immediately. This communication 
and any information transmitted by this communication may also be 
considered protected health information as defined under the Health 
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and its related regulations 
(a.k.a., HIPAA) or any other similar state law. Please exercise due care and  
ensure that you comply with its contractual and legal obligations.

- Original Message -
From: Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2007 2:19:22 AM (GMT+0530) Asia/Calcutta
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Detecting card on the PCI Slot

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:59:37AM +0530, Sanjay Rajdev wrote:
 I have some Analog card on a PCI slot of a remote computer, Is their a way I 
 can figure out remotely the name of the card.
 I have FC6 installed on the machine.

lspci 

What driver handles it?

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen   
icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Detecting card on the PCI Slot

2007-06-04 Thread Sanjay Rajdev
Thanks for the suggestion, I figured out the cards.

I have 2 Digium TDM400P card and a Sangoma A101 single port card on the machine.
Any suggestion on installing them.

Regards,
Sanjay Rajdev


- Original Message -
From: Gordon Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2007 2:11:47 AM (GMT+0530) Asia/Calcutta
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Detecting card on the PCI Slot

On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Sanjay Rajdev wrote:

 I have some Analog card on a PCI slot of a remote computer, Is their a way I 
 can figure out remotely the name of the card.
 I have FC6 installed on the machine.

Try the 'lspci' command.

Eg:

:00:14.0 Communication controller: Tiger Jet Network Inc. Tiger3XX 
Modem/ISDN interface

is what a Digium TDM400P card looks like.

Gordon
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] debug logs

2007-06-04 Thread ram



This notifies you that it has been used (IIRC).



Hi

what does that mean , it has been IIRC ?

ram
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] realtime ldap peer matching

2007-06-04 Thread Gavin Henry

On 04/06/07, Caio Zanolla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi everyone,

in ldap realtime sip peers i need fullcontact set to
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] for asterisk to correctly match the peers (at least
for the natted peers to reach them)...

anyway, how do I populate fullcontact on the fly with information from
exten and userip?


Wouldn't these just be dialplan vars?


of course, i could just do it staticaly on ldap but since the info is
already there why not make use of it?

on res_ldap.conf i have attribute = fullcontact = AstAccountFullContact
it would be nice to have something like:
attribute = fullcontact = sip:.$AstExten.@.$AstIPaddress
or some kind of dialplan scripting to archieve this...


I'm pretty sure res_ldap.c can't do this yet.

What version (* and res_ldap) and schema are you using btw?

IIRC, the latest version doesn't need:

attribute = fullcontact = AstAccountFullContact

just:

fullcontact = AstAccountFullContact


Thanks,

Gavin.




cheers,
Caio.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] debug logs

2007-06-04 Thread Mike Lynchfield

means (I)f (I) (R)emember (C)orrectly

On 6/4/07, ram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 This notifies you that it has been used (IIRC).


Hi

what does that mean , it has been IIRC ?

ram


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





--
Mike
Sales Manager
http://www.voicemeup.com
Making it happen
1.877.807.VOIP (8647)
1.514.312.7030
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Auto Dial Problem

2007-06-04 Thread aslay-pinwee
Dear Sir,

Thank you very much


ASLAY


- Original Message - 
From: Nasir Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Auto Dial Problem


 Hi,

  I setup auto dial on my asterisk server. The problem
  is asterisk does not wait for called party to answer
  the call but proceed to process the extension specifed
  in my .call file

 No problem with Auto Call

  exten = _01N.,1,Dial(Zap/g1/${EXTEN},20)

 the problem with zap channel

 try callprogress with yes in zapata.conf

 It may cause another problem, after remote party has picked up the
 call and asterisk still does not know it. and in ringing status.

 if your dial plan work fine now, then no need to change rxgain.
 otherwise.

 Just Increase your rxgain value. try with different values and choose
 best one.

 if rxgain greater then desired value  ?? you my receive invalid report
 that remote party has picked up.

 if rxgain less then desired value  ?? you my receive invalid ringing
 report after call is answered.

 so adjust it according your requirement and also check noise and quality
 your PSTN lines.


 Regards

 Nasir Iqbal

 ICT Innovations



 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Calls being dropped

2007-06-04 Thread Mike Lynchfield

that becasue the reinvite is using a private ip probably..

sip debug

pastebin the results..

look in the re-invite part..



On 6/4/07, Compnet Bobby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




We have the latest version of asterisk, on a xeon dell server (2gb ram),
with 6 snom320's(latest firmware) and 3 grandstream gxp 2000's (latest
stable firmware) and are having a few problems. We have a basic menu that
transfers calls to different extensions. The problems can be found on all
extensions. We have 2 different incoming providers and the problem happens
on both providers.



I want your input on 2 problems, they are the following:



1.



60% of the time everything works fine and there are no problems, 40% of
times when the calls are transferred to an extension, after a few seconds  ,
the call drops. The log from the server is below(this is from pickup to
hangup, the main area of concern is where it says warning).





-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Answer(SIP/9097406868-09e110f8,
) in new stack

-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2]
BackGround(SIP/9097406868-09e110f8, menus/welcome-to-exec) in new stack

-- SIP/9097406868-09e110f8 Playing 'menus/welcome-to-exec' (language
'en')

  == CDR updated on SIP/9097406868-09e110f8

-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Dial(SIP/9097406868-09e110f8,
SIP/103|50|m) in new stack

-- Called 103

-- Started music on hold, class 'default', on SIP/9097406868-09e110f8

-- SIP/103-09dedd68 is ringing

[May 29 09:05:22] WARNING[2678]: chan_sip.c:1899 retrans_pkt: Maximum
retries exceeded on transmission
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for seqno 1 (Critical Response)

[May 29 09:05:22] WARNING[2678]: chan_sip.c:1916 retrans_pkt: Hanging up
call [EMAIL PROTECTED] - no reply to our critical
packet.

-- Stopped music on hold on SIP/9097406868-09e110f8

  == Spawn extension (from-sip, 103, 1) exited non-zero on
'SIP/9097406868-09e110f8'





2. When a call comes in or is transferred(not on outgoing), there is a
delay until the person on the incoming line can hear you. We can hear them,
but they can't hear us. Sometimes there is no delay, sometimes for person
calling in cant hear you for 6 seconds.





Thanks for the help in advance!!!











___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





--
Mike
Sales Manager
http://www.voicemeup.com
Making it happen
1.877.807.VOIP (8647)
1.514.312.7030
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Oddity

2007-06-04 Thread Mike Hammett
I have two Asterisk servers.  One is my primary server that I link to all of
my providers and the other is at an office building with multiple tenants.

 

If I tell Asterisk to dial an entry in the iax.conf that is for one customer
off that second box, why does it use a different account for a different
customer?

 

It still ends up at the correct box, but it is hard to troubleshoot issues
when calls are coming in under different accounts (probably different
account codes too).

 

Also, the second customer on that box.  Earlier today everything worked fine
as was.  Later all calls going to that customer were going to the default
context, despite the fact that I explicitly defined the context I wanted the
calls to go to in all entries in iax.conf.

 

 

 

-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com http://www.ics-il.com

 

 

 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   >