Re: [asterisk-users] realtime sip peers : musiconhold class
I have another file that reads : [r...@asterisk ]# file intro\ extended\ version.wav intro extended version.wav: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, stereo 44100 Hz With the same result : [r...@asterisk ]# asterisk -rx file convert /var/lib/asterisk/moh/test/intro\ extended\ version.wav /var/lib/asterisk/moh/test/testing.alaw Unable to open input file: /var/lib/asterisk/moh/test/intro extended version.wav Jonas. On 08/13/2010 01:49 PM, Gareth Blades wrote: The wav file is not in the correct format. Also the number of channels and sampling frequency it is reporting is complete nonsense. This is what it should display:- RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 8000 Hz -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on AMD
On 08/13/2010 03:48 PM, Lyle McKarns wrote: Mostly I was wondering if there are any reasons I cannot 1) Use and AMD board and 2) Run a mixed Intel/AMD enviroment What is a 'mixed Intel/AMD environment'? It's not possible to have both Intel and AMD processors in the same system. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com www.asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] realtime sip peers : musiconhold class
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Jonas Kellens jonas.kell...@telenet.be wrote: intro extended version.wav: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, stereo 44100 Hz You need *MONO, 8000Hz* $ man sox -- Motiejus Jakštys -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on AMD
By a mixed environment I mean some Asterisk servers running on AMD and some running on Intel Thanks, Lyle J. McKarns --- Networking/Linux Engineering Team n|m Nexus Management 4 Industrial Parkway Suite 101 Brunswick, Maine 04011 Tel (USA) : 1 207 319 1105 Tel (UK) : 0207 100 4968 Fax: 1 207 725 8552 Nexus Management, Inc.│ Registered Office: 4 Industrial Parkway, Suite 101, Brunswick, Maine. 04011│Company No. 19891257D, Registered in Maine│ A member of the Nexus Management Plc group of companies -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 10:27 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on AMD On 08/13/2010 03:48 PM, Lyle McKarns wrote: Mostly I was wondering if there are any reasons I cannot 1) Use and AMD board and 2) Run a mixed Intel/AMD enviroment What is a 'mixed Intel/AMD environment'? It's not possible to have both Intel and AMD processors in the same system. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com www.asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on AMD
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Lyle McKarns lyle.mcka...@nexusmgmt.com wrote: By a mixed environment I mean some Asterisk servers running on AMD and some running on Intel Thanks, Lyle J. McKarns --- Networking/Linux Engineering Team n|m Nexus Management 4 Industrial Parkway Suite 101 Brunswick, Maine 04011 Tel (USA) : 1 207 319 1105 Tel (UK) : 0207 100 4968 Fax: 1 207 725 8552 Nexus Management, Inc.│ Registered Office: 4 Industrial Parkway, Suite 101, Brunswick, Maine. 04011│Company No. 19891257D, Registered in Maine│ A member of the Nexus Management Plc group of companies -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 10:27 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on AMD On 08/13/2010 03:48 PM, Lyle McKarns wrote: Mostly I was wondering if there are any reasons I cannot 1) Use and AMD board and 2) Run a mixed Intel/AMD enviroment What is a 'mixed Intel/AMD environment'? It's not possible to have both Intel and AMD processors in the same system. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com www.asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users I'm not quite clear why that'd be a problem, if you want to use the same binaries with amd/intel don't go to the trouble to compile optimized for one or the other. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on AMD
On 08/14/2010 09:33 AM, Lyle McKarns wrote: By a mixed environment I mean some Asterisk servers running on AMD and some running on Intel If it was possible for that to matter, then the software would be very poorly written indeed. As another poster said, the only way that would have any effect is if you compiled binaries specifically for one family of processors and used them on the other. As far as how the software operates, by definition the processor type/family does not matter at all. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com www.asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on AMD
Hi! By a mixed environment I mean some Asterisk servers running on AMD and some running on Intel If it was possible for that to matter, then the software would be very poorly written indeed. As another poster said, the only way that would have any effect is if you compiled binaries specifically for one family of processors and used them on the other. As far as how the software operates, by definition the processor type/family does not matter at all. Quite some time ago there was a difference in how the GSM codec was handled on AMD K6/Athlon systems, but that did not matter greatly, and it was just a tiny little optimisation setting in the Makefile so gain a little more speed. Philipp -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk on AMD
On 08/14/2010 12:59 PM, Philipp von Klitzing wrote: Hi! By a mixed environment I mean some Asterisk servers running on AMD and some running on Intel If it was possible for that to matter, then the software would be very poorly written indeed. As another poster said, the only way that would have any effect is if you compiled binaries specifically for one family of processors and used them on the other. As far as how the software operates, by definition the processor type/family does not matter at all. Quite some time ago there was a difference in how the GSM codec was handled on AMD K6/Athlon systems, but that did not matter greatly, and it was just a tiny little optimisation setting in the Makefile so gain a little more speed. But it did not produce different output nor accept different input; it wouldn't have mattered if an Intel-based system was talking to an AMD-based system, because the data *outside* the system was the same. That was my point. There are many CPU family-specific optimizations that can be used for various parts of Asterisk, but in the end they don't affect how Asterisk operates, only the speed at which it does so. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: kflem...@digium.com Check us out at www.digium.com www.asterisk.org -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] install asterisk
Alan Lord (News) alansli...@gmail.com writes: Fedora is *not* a server operating system and not one I would choose to run asterisk on. Fedora is an excellent server operating system. I manage more than a thousand installs if you count virtual ones. I would recommend using either CentOS or a Debian/Ubuntu Server build without X11 and all the other cruft that comes with a Desktop OS - which is what Fedora is. No one forces you to install X11 on Fedora. /Benny -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] BLF/Call Pickup using SPA942, SPA962, SPA932
Hi all, There are a lot of posts around the web about my question; unfortunately I have not been able to get any of the solutions to work. I'm using Asterisk 1.6.2.8 under CentOS 5.5. I'm trying to get call pickup working for the secretaries that monitor their bosses' phones. The BLF and the speed dial works great on the Linksys phones. Call pickup is the problem. My features.conf has *8 as the pickupexten in features.conf. On the SPA's the extended function is: fnc=blf+sd+cp;sub=...@$proxy;ext=...@$proxy the SPA932 Call Pickup Code: field is set to *8. I ring the extension; the lamp flashes on the shared line on the SPA, just like it should. When I press the flashing lamp, the CLI gives me: Notice [1328] Nothing to pick up for baf8bc-e23bc...@192.168.1.39 note: (this is the ip address of the SPA-942 in this case) then Got SIP response 603 Decline back from 192.168.1.47 note: (this is the ringing extension, in this case a Polycom 330). I have tried different pickup codes, and some web pages say to add a # at the end of the call pickup code. When I do that, the CLI says Notice [1328] Call from '602' to extension '**600' rejected because extension not found So - how to resolve this? Do I need dialplan code to handle this? I get the clue from nothing to pickup for blah blah that I'm close but may be missing something simple. Thanks all Cassius -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] BLF/Call Pickup using SPA942, SPA962, SPA932
hi, just taking a wild guess here, are the extensions set to be in the same pickupgroup? regards ron On 8/15/10 7:01 AM, Cassius Smith wrote: Hi all, There are a lot of posts around the web about my question; unfortunately I have not been able to get any of the solutions to work. I'm using Asterisk 1.6.2.8 under CentOS 5.5. I'm trying to get call pickup working for the secretaries that monitor their bosses' phones. The BLF and the speed dial works great on the Linksys phones. Call pickup is the problem. My features.conf has *8 as the pickupexten in features.conf. On the SPA's the extended function is: fnc=blf+sd+cp;sub=...@$proxy;ext=...@$proxy the SPA932 Call Pickup Code: field is set to *8. I ring the extension; the lamp flashes on the shared line on the SPA, just like it should. When I press the flashing lamp, the CLI gives me: Notice [1328] Nothing to pick up for baf8bc-e23bc...@192.168.1.39 note: (this is the ip address of the SPA-942 in this case) then Got SIP response 603 Decline back from 192.168.1.47 note: (this is the ringing extension, in this case a Polycom 330). I have tried different pickup codes, and some web pages say to add a # at the end of the call pickup code. When I do that, the CLI says Notice [1328] Call from '602' to extension '**600' rejected because extension not found So - how to resolve this? Do I need dialplan code to handle this? I get the clue from nothing to pickup for blah blah that I'm close but may be missing something simple. Thanks all Cassius -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] BLF/Call Pickup using SPA942, SPA962, SPA932
Yes, all set to same pickup group. Here is sip.conf setup (all ext's are similarly configured): [600] type=friend mailbox=...@default context=users pickupgroup=1 host=dynamic secret=*** -Original Message- From: Ron nha...@gmail.com Reply-to: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] BLF/Call Pickup using SPA942, SPA962, SPA932 Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 07:29:11 +0800 hi, just taking a wild guess here, are the extensions set to be in the same pickupgroup? regards ron On 8/15/10 7:01 AM, Cassius Smith wrote: Hi all, There are a lot of posts around the web about my question; unfortunately I have not been able to get any of the solutions to work. I'm using Asterisk 1.6.2.8 under CentOS 5.5. I'm trying to get call pickup working for the secretaries that monitor their bosses' phones. The BLF and the speed dial works great on the Linksys phones. Call pickup is the problem. My features.conf has *8 as the pickupexten in features.conf. On the SPA's the extended function is: fnc=blf+sd+cp;sub=...@$proxy;ext=...@$proxy the SPA932 Call Pickup Code: field is set to *8. I ring the extension; the lamp flashes on the shared line on the SPA, just like it should. When I press the flashing lamp, the CLI gives me: Notice [1328] Nothing to pick up for baf8bc-e23bc...@192.168.1.39 note: (this is the ip address of the SPA-942 in this case) then Got SIP response 603 Decline back from 192.168.1.47 note: (this is the ringing extension, in this case a Polycom 330). I have tried different pickup codes, and some web pages say to add a # at the end of the call pickup code. When I do that, the CLI says Notice [1328] Call from '602' to extension '**600' rejected because extension not found So - how to resolve this? Do I need dialplan code to handle this? I get the clue from nothing to pickup for blah blah that I'm close but may be missing something simple. Thanks all Cassius -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs: http://www.asterisk.org/hello asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
